8
September 2005
Richard R. McGill
Illinois Pollution Control Board
R04-25 Hearing Officer
Mr.
McGill:
I would like
to request that the following corrections be made to
my testimony. If these corrections need
to
be directed to another person or office, please let me know.
Thomas J. Murphy, Ph.
D.
773-338-3165
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, SEPTEMBER 8, 2005
Corrections to Thomas Murphy’s
testimony;
R04-25, 25 Aug 05
2
Line #
—
Change
0185-17
shared
->
chaired
0185-22
general
->
Journal of
research
->
Research
0185-24
4wt
->
their
01 86-18
concentration-> concentrations
0187-4
1986->1996
0187-9
microinvertebrates
->
macroinvertebrates
01 87-11
fueled
->
field
0188-6
insert ‘or’ after ‘saturation’
0188-17
with
->at
0188-20
The--> For
0188-21
to
->
at the
0189-6
liability-> reliability
0189-12
filing-> fouling
0189-20
[Begin a new paragraph with, “In interpreting
...“]
0189-22
[For clarity, drop the ‘DO’
and the commas]
0189-24
when interpreted is
->
was interpreted as
0 190-7
to
get the
->
with simultaneous
0190-9,10
The other
...
is to
->
Was there other quality assurance information to
0190-14
latter
-->
laminar
0190-14,16
So the positioning
...
get very
->
So that the relative positioning ofthe sensor can
give very
01 90-18
outliars
->
outliers
0190-19
often
->
can
to systems.
->
into system functioning.
0190-20
there’s good reason
0190-22
outliars
->
outliers
0191-2
deserved
0191-17
wi4->in
0191-22__—
Insert a comma and the words,
‘thermal inputs,’
after the word channelization
0191-24
effected
->
affected
0192-18
outliars
->
outliers
0192-19
very, very-> very, very, very
0192-20
and
->
are
are
->and
Corrections to Thomas
Murphy’s
testimony;
R04-25, 25 Aug 05
3
0192-22
verified-> unverified
0192-23
to
->of
0195-7
beautification
->
eutrophication
0195-10
to beg straight-> on
atmospheric
0195-24
is
->
has
0197-20
or when there’s a
well,
0197-21
anyway,
0197-22
[delete entire line]
0197-24
chemical
->
chemical measurements.
0197-24 to
0198-3
[There was a brief exchange with
Dr.
Garvey that only remnants are present here.
The gist ofthe discussion was that the continuous DO measurements are more
useful
and desirable, but it is more difficult to
get reliable data from them.
I think
this discussion should be present in the record in some manner.
Perhaps replace 0197-24 to 0198-3 with:
There are many advantages to the use ofcontinuous DO measurements. However,
it is much more difficult to obtain reliable data from them so one must be much
more careful in using data from them.
0199-7
in any-> demanding
0201-7
you’re measuring
>
you measure chemically.
0202-1
desatunte
->
be saturated
0202-7
en
0202-12
give a little saturation
->
do a little_calculation