ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June 14, 1973
)
DAVID N. MARTIS
)
)
)
v.
)
PCB 73-144
)
)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
)
)
OPINION AND ORDER OP THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Dumelle)
This
is
an appeal from an Agency denial of a sewer connection
permit application.
No hearing was held.
Petitioner is the owner of
a newly constructed 8-unit apartment
building
in Lockport which
is presently ready for occupancy.
For
some reason petititioner’s contractor did not obtain an Agency
permit during construction.
After the building was almost entirely
completed and the Agency learned that no permit had been applied
for,
the
owner was contacted.
The problem here results from the fact that
a main sewer line
downstream from the new building has
a crook
in it which is inhibiting
a proper flow.
There
is
an existing 12-inch sewer line which is
hydraulically overloaded
as
a result of present flows
thru an existing
24-inch sewer immediately upstream from the 12-inch sewer.
Flow
tributary to the 24-inch sewer is given at 0.858 MCD while the rated
capacity of the 12-inch sewer is given as only 0.40 MCD which
is
less
than half the required capacity.
The City has informed the Agency that the 12-inch sewer
is subject
to bypassing raw sewage
into Mime Creek, an intermittent stream
tributary
to the Illinois and Michigan Canal.
The Agency believes
that petitioner’s connection to the sewer would add to the amount
of raw sewage being bypassed to Mime Creek and could contribute
to
public health hazards and nuisances
as
a result of overflowing
and sewer backups.
This raw sewage overflow could contribute
to the
degradation of both Milne Creek
and the Illinois
and Michigan Canal.
In March,
1973 the City received
an Agency permit for the replace-
ment
of the overloaded 12-inch sewer with
a 24-inch segment.
The
project
is scheduled for completion by August,
1973.
We must deny
the variance in this
case.
This hardship is clearly
self imposed.
It was the petitioner’s own contractor who failed
to
/
I
-2-
get the Agency permit.
If the Agency were contacted earlier,
the
petitioner would have learned of the unavailability of
a permit
before certain commitments were made and obligations undertaken.
At this point we cannot grant the variance as
a result of petitioner’s
own oversight.
The sewer connection will have
to wait until
the
City replaces the sewer.
After the City sewer work
is done,
the per-
mit should be
available without
a variance being
necessary.
This opinion constitutes
the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of
law.
IT
IS
SO ORDERED.
I,
Christan L. Moffett,
Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted
on the
/4*.’
day of June,
1973 by
a vote of
.3—O
Illinois Pollution
1 Board