RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD JUL 202005
CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, ILLINOIS
PollutionSTATE
OFControlILLINOISOoard
MORTON F. DOROTHY,
)
Complainant,
)
)
vs.
)
No. PCB 05-049
)
FLEX-N-GATE CORPORATION,
an Illinois Corporation,
)
Respondent.
)
COMPLAINANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY AND RESPONSE TO MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO REPLY
Complainant Morton F. Dorothy, moves that the Board grant him leave to reply to
respondent Flex-N-Gate Corporation’s Response to Complainant’s Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment as to Count I, moves for leave to dispense with duplicative copies,
and makes the following response to Respondent’s Motion for Leave to Reply:
1.
On June 20, 2005, Complainant served a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
as to Count I.
2.
On July 8, 2005, Respondent filed a Response to Complainant’s Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment as to Count I.
3.
On July 8, 2005, Respondent also filed a Motion to Strike Affidavits Filed and
Unsupported Statements made in Support of Complainant’s Summary Judgment
Filings and Motion for Admonishment of Complainant.
4.
Complainant moves for leave to reply pursuant to Section 101 .500(c) in order to
prevent material prejudice.
a.
Respondent has, in the Response, denied the truth of facts which it has
admitted in discovery and in affidavits attached to its motions, which facts
Complainant regarded as established beyond doubt at the time he filed
his motion.
b.
Respondent has mischaracterized Complainant’s arguments, and has
advanced arguments that Complainant could not have anticipated.
5.
Complainant has no objection to Respondent’s Motion for Leave to Reply, but
asks the Board to set a prompt schedule for such replies.
6.
Respondent has also objected, in the Motion to Strike Affidavits, to the lack of
exhibits attached to affidavits.
7.
Respondent cites Illinois Supreme Court Rule 191(a) in support for its argument
that copies of documents must be attached to affidavits. Complainant believes
that this is referring to documents other than those already on file in the instant
case. Complainant does not feel that it is necessary to attach copies of
documents that are already on file in this case.
8.
Complainant is an unemployed factory worker who uses coin-operated, public
copying machines. Making copies of documents in this manner is extraordinarily
time-consuming, and very expensive. To the extent the Board may agree with
the respondent that such duplicative copies may be required, Complainant
requests leave to dispense with them in this case.
9.
Complainant expects to file additional affidavits in connection with his reply, and
would appreciate a ruling on this issue before the reply is due.
WHEREFORE Complainant prays that the Board grant him leave to reply to the
Response to Complainant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count I, and
grant him leave to dispense with any requirement to attach to affidavits copies of
documents that have already been filed in this case.
~‘-c°~
Morton F. Dorothy, Complainant
State of Illinois
)
SS
County of Champaign
AFFIDAVIT
1.
Respondent has, in the Response to Complainanfs Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment as to Count I, denied the truth of facts which it has admitted in
discovery and in affidavits attached to its motions, which facts Complainant
regarded as established beyond doubt at the time he filed his motion.
2.
Respondent has mischaracterized Complainant’s arguments, and has advanced
arguments that Complainant could not have anticipated.
3.
Complainant is an unemployed factory worker who uses coin-operated, public
copying machines. Making copies of documents in this manner is extraordinarily
time-consuming, and very expensive.
Morton F. Dorothy, Complainant
The undersigned, a notary public in ~~for the aforesaid County and State,
certifies tha1 the above person appeared before•..rne and signed the foregoing document
on the
(~‘~-
day of July, 2005.
~
My
Commiggjw,
£xpiresJt,26,o
Morton F. Dorothy
104 West University
Southwest Suite
Urbana, IL 61801
217/384-1010