Printed on Recycled Paper
1
S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )
)
Complainant, )
)
v. ) PCB 05-66
)
PETCO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, )
an Indiana Corporation, )
)
Respondent. )
ANSWER
NOW COMES Respondent, PETCO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
,
by its attorneys
Sorling, Northrup, Hanna, Cullen & Cochran, Ltd, Charles J. Northrup, of Counsel, and for
its Answer to Complainant’s Complaint states as follows:
COUNT I
(Water Pollution Violations (May 24, 2004))
1. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph one and
further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
2. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph two.
3. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph three.
4. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph four.
5. Respondent admits that a portion of Section 12 of the Illinois Environmental
protection Act (“Act”) is set out at paragraph five.
6. Respondent admits that Section 3.165 of the Act is set out at paragraph six.
7. Respondent admits that a portion of Section 3.395 of the Act is set out at paragraph
seven.
8. Respondent admits that Section 3.545 of the Act is set out at paragraph eight.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005
Printed on Recycled Paper
2
S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
9. Respondent admits that Section 3.550 of the Act is set out at paragraph nine.
10. Respondent admits that Section 302.203 of the Illinois Pollution Control Board’s
(“Board”) water pollution regulations is set out at paragraph ten.
11. Respondent admits that Section 302.208(g) of the Board’s water pollution regulations
references a general use quality standard for chloride.
12. Respondent admits that a portion of Section 304.105 of the Board’s water pollution
regulations is set out at paragraph twelve.
13. Respondent admits that Section 304.106 of the Board’s water pollution regulations is
set out at paragraph 13.
14. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph 14.
15. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 15 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
16. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 16 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
17. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 17 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
18. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 18 and
further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
19. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count I of its Complaint.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005
Printed on Recycled Paper
3
S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
COUNT II
(Water Quality Violations (May 24, 2004))
1- 20. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
1 through 20 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs 1 through 20 of this Count II.
21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
23. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 23 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
24. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 24 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count II of its Complaint.
COUNT III
(Water Pollution Violations (August 21, 2004))
1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs one through 13 of this Count III.
14. Respondent admits that it reported a release as set out in paragraph 14. Respondent
denies as vague the allegation that the release was caused by a “large” corrosion hole. Respondent
further clarifies that the release occurred at the J.B. Tucker lease.
15. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 15 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
16. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 16 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
17. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 17 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005
Printed on Recycled Paper
4
S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
18. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 18 and
further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
19. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 and
further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count III of its Complaint.
COUNT IV
(Water Quality Violations (August 21, 2004))
1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs one through 13 of this Count IV.
14-19. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
14 through 19 of Count III for its Answer to paragraphs 14 through 19 of this Count IV.
20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
23. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 23 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count IV of its Complaint.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005
Printed on Recycled Paper
5
S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
COUNT V
(Water Pollution Violations (October 4, 2004))
1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs1 through 13 of this Count V.
14. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph 14.
15. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 15 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
16. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 16 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
17. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 17 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
18. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 18 and
further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
19. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 and
further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count V of its Complaint.
COUNT VI
(Water Quality Violations (October 4, 2004))
1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Count VI.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005
Printed on Recycled Paper
6
S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
14-19. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
14 through 19 of Count V for its Answer to paragraphs 14 through 19 of this Count VI.
20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
23. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 23 as it calls for a legal
conclusion.
WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count VI of its Complaint.
Respectfully submitted
PETCO PETROLEUM CORPORATION,
Respondent
By:_____________________________________
__
One of Its Attorneys
Sorling, Northrup, Hanna,
Cullen & Cochran, Ltd.
Charles J. Northrup, and
James G. Fahey of Counsel
Suite 800 Illinois Building
P.O. Box 5131
Springfield, IL 62705
Telephone: (217) 544-1144
Facsimile: (217) 522-3173
E-Mail: cjnorthrup@sorlinglaw.com
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005
Printed on Recycled Paper
7
S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that an original and ten (10) copies of the foregoing
document were served by Federal Express to:
Ms. Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
and one copy to:
Ms. Carol Webb
Hearing Office
Illinois Pollution Control Board
1021 North Grand Ave. East
Post Office Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9274
Mr. Tom Davis
Illinois Attorney General’s Office
Environmental Division
500 South Second Street
Springfield, IL 62706
and by depositing same in the United States mail in Springfield, Illinois, on the ___ day of March,
2005, with postage fully prepaid.
_________________________________________
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005