Printed on Recycled Paper
     
    1
     
    S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
     
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )
    )
    Complainant, )
    )
    v. ) PCB 05-66
    )
    PETCO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, )
    an Indiana Corporation, )
    )
    Respondent. )
     
     
     
    ANSWER
     
     
    NOW COMES Respondent, PETCO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
    ,
    by its attorneys
    Sorling, Northrup, Hanna, Cullen & Cochran, Ltd, Charles J. Northrup, of Counsel, and for
    its Answer to Complainant’s Complaint states as follows:
     
    COUNT I
    (Water Pollution Violations (May 24, 2004))
     
     
    1. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph one and
    further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
     
    2. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph two.
     
    3. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph three.
     
    4. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph four.
     
    5. Respondent admits that a portion of Section 12 of the Illinois Environmental
    protection Act (“Act”) is set out at paragraph five.
     
    6. Respondent admits that Section 3.165 of the Act is set out at paragraph six.
     
    7. Respondent admits that a portion of Section 3.395 of the Act is set out at paragraph
    seven.
     
    8. Respondent admits that Section 3.545 of the Act is set out at paragraph eight.
     
    ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005

     
     
    Printed on Recycled Paper
     
    2
     
    S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
    9. Respondent admits that Section 3.550 of the Act is set out at paragraph nine.
     
    10. Respondent admits that Section 302.203 of the Illinois Pollution Control Board’s
    (“Board”) water pollution regulations is set out at paragraph ten.
     
    11. Respondent admits that Section 302.208(g) of the Board’s water pollution regulations
    references a general use quality standard for chloride.
     
    12. Respondent admits that a portion of Section 304.105 of the Board’s water pollution
    regulations is set out at paragraph twelve.
     
    13. Respondent admits that Section 304.106 of the Board’s water pollution regulations is
    set out at paragraph 13.
     
    14. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph 14.
     
    15. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 15 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    16. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 16 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    17. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 17 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    18. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 18 and
    further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
     
    19. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
    Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count I of its Complaint.
     
    ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005

     
     
    Printed on Recycled Paper
     
    3
     
    S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
     
    COUNT II
    (Water Quality Violations (May 24, 2004))
     
     
    1- 20. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
    1 through 20 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs 1 through 20 of this Count II.
     
    21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    23. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 23 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    24. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 24 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
    Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count II of its Complaint.
     
    COUNT III
    (Water Pollution Violations (August 21, 2004))
     
     
    1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
    1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs one through 13 of this Count III.
     
    14. Respondent admits that it reported a release as set out in paragraph 14. Respondent
    denies as vague the allegation that the release was caused by a “large” corrosion hole. Respondent
    further clarifies that the release occurred at the J.B. Tucker lease.
     
    15. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 15 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    16. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 16 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    17. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 17 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
     
     
    ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005

     
     
    Printed on Recycled Paper
     
    4
     
    S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
    18. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 18 and
    further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
     
    19. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 and
    further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
     
    20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
    Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count III of its Complaint.
     
    COUNT IV
    (Water Quality Violations (August 21, 2004))
     
     
    1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
    1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs one through 13 of this Count IV.
     
    14-19. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
    14 through 19 of Count III for its Answer to paragraphs 14 through 19 of this Count IV.
     
    20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    23. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 23 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
    Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count IV of its Complaint.
    ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005

     
     
    Printed on Recycled Paper
     
    5
     
    S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
     
    COUNT V
    (Water Pollution Violations (October 4, 2004))
     
     
    1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
    1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs1 through 13 of this Count V.
     
    14. Respondent admits the allegations set out in paragraph 14.
     
    15. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 15 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    16. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 16 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    17. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 17 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    18. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 18 and
    further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
     
    19. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set out in paragraph 19 and
    further states it possesses insufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the allegations.
     
    20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
    Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count V of its Complaint.
     
    COUNT VI
    (Water Quality Violations (October 4, 2004))
     
     
    1 -13. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
    1 through 13 of Count I for its Answer to paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Count VI.
     
     
    ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005

     
     
    Printed on Recycled Paper
     
    6
     
    S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
    14-19. Respondent restates and incorporates herein by reference its Answers for paragraphs
    14 through 19 of Count V for its Answer to paragraphs 14 through 19 of this Count VI.
     
    20. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 20 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    21. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 21 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    22. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 22 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    23. Respondent denies the allegations set out in paragraph 23 as it calls for a legal
    conclusion.
     
    WHEREFORE Respondent, Petco Petroleum Corporation, respectfully requests that this
    Board deny all forms of Relief prayed for by the Complainant in Count VI of its Complaint.
    Respectfully submitted
     
    PETCO PETROLEUM CORPORATION,
    Respondent
     
     
     
    By:_____________________________________
    __
    One of Its Attorneys
    Sorling, Northrup, Hanna,
    Cullen & Cochran, Ltd.
    Charles J. Northrup, and
    James G. Fahey of Counsel
    Suite 800 Illinois Building
    P.O. Box 5131
    Springfield, IL 62705
    Telephone: (217) 544-1144
    Facsimile: (217) 522-3173
    E-Mail: cjnorthrup@sorlinglaw.com
     
     
    ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005

     
     
    Printed on Recycled Paper
     
    7
     
    S0465445.1 3/1/05 CJN CJN
    PROOF OF SERVICE
     
     
    The undersigned hereby certifies that an original and ten (10) copies of the foregoing
    document were served by Federal Express to:
     
    Ms. Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
    Pollution Control Board
    100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
    Chicago, IL 60601
     
     
    and one copy to:
     
    Ms. Carol Webb
    Hearing Office
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    1021 North Grand Ave. East
    Post Office Box 19276
    Springfield, IL 62794-9274
     
     
    Mr. Tom Davis
    Illinois Attorney General’s Office
    Environmental Division
    500 South Second Street
    Springfield, IL 62706
     
     
    and by depositing same in the United States mail in Springfield, Illinois, on the ___ day of March,
    2005, with postage fully prepaid.
     
     
    _________________________________________
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
    ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MARCH 2, 2005

    Back to top