BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
NOTICE
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARDOF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSIONOF APPEAL PERIOD
Formatting Requirements for the 01 Record of the Electronically Submitted
Groundwater and Leachate Data (the 01 Record portion of the LPC-160 is included
for example purposes)
Spaces 63-102 Sample Appearance
Spaces 103-142 Collector Comnients

BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.,)

Petitioner,

)

ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

)

Respondent.

)

NOTICE

LE ~YE 0

CLERK’S OFFICE

JAN

2005

STATE OF ILUNOIS

Pollution Control Board

PCBNo.

05-

)

(RCRA

—

Ninety Day Extension)

DorothyM.

Gunn, Clerk

JohnDennison

Illinois Pollution Control Board

URS Corporation

James R. Thompson Center

122 South Michigan Avenue

100 West Randolph Street

Suite

1920

Suite 11-500

Chicago, IL

60603

Chicago, IL

60601

PLEASE

TAKE NOTICE

that I have

today filed

with the

office of the

Clerk

of the

Pollution

Control Board a REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION OF

APPEAL PERIOD, copies of which

are herewith served upon

you.

Respectfully submitted,

ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

Assi~tant

Counsel

Special Assistant Attorney General

Division of Legal Counsel

1021

North Grand Avenue, East

P.O. Box 19276

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276

217/782-5544

217/782-9143 (TDD)

Dated: January

19, 2005

BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.,)

Petitioner,

)

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

)

PROTECTION AGENCY,

)

Respondent.

)

REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION

OF APPEAL

PERIOD

NOW COMES

the Respondent, the Illinois

Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois

EPA”), by one

of its

attorneys, John J. Kim,

Assistant

Counsel

and

Special Assistant

Attorney

General,

and,

pursuant

Section

40(a)(1)

of the

Illinois

Environmental Protection

Act

(415

ILCS

5/40(a)(1))

and

Ill.

Adm.

Code

105.208,

hereby

requests

that

the

Illinois

Pollution

Control Board (“Board”) grant an extension ofthe thirty-five

(35)

day period forpetitioning for a

hearing to

April

25,

2005,

or any

other date not

more than a total of one

hundred

twenty-five

(125)

days from the date of service ofthe Illinois

EPA’s

final decision.

The

125th

day from the

date

of service

April

24,

2005,

Sunday.

In support

thereof,. the

Illinois

EPA respectfully

states as follows:

On December

15,

2004,

the Illinois EPA

issued

a final decision to the Petitioner.

(Exhibit A)

On January

18, 2005, the Petitionermade a written request to the Illinois EPA for

extension

of time by

which

file

petition

for review,

asking

the Illinois

EPA join

requesting that

the Board

extend the thirty-five

day period

for filing

a petition to

ninety

days.

The earliest date that service could be complete was December 16, 2004.

(Exhibit B)

~ECE~VE~

CLERK’S OFFICE

JAN

2005

STATE OF ILLINOIS

PoUution Control

Bo&~rd

PCBNo.05-

(RCRA

—

Ninety Day Extension)

The additional time requested by the parties may eliminate the need for a hearing

in this matter or, in the alternative, allow the parties to identify issues and limit the

scope of any

hearing that may be necessary to resolve this matter.

WHEREFORE,

for the reasons

stated above,

the parties

request

that

the Board,

the

interest of administrative and judicial

economy, grant this request for a ninety-day extension of

the thirty-five day period for petitioning for a hearing.

Respectfully submitted,

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

Respondent

Assistant Counsel

Special Assistant Attorney General

Division of Legal Counsel

1021 North Grand Avenue, East

P.O. Box

19276

Springfield, Illinois

62794-9276

217/782-5544

217/782-9143

(TDD)

Dated: January 19, 2005

This filing

submitted on recycled

paper.

01/18/05

TUE

17:35

FAX

312

939

0162

URS -CHI CAGO

~Tj003

C~.

‘4

ILLINOIS

ENViRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY

1021

NORTH

GRAND

AVENUE

EAST,

P.O.

8ox 19276,

SPRINGFIELD,

ILLINOIS

62794.9276,

217-782-3397

JAMES

THOMPSON

CENTER1

100

WEST

RANDOLPH,

SUITE

11-300,

CHIcAGO,

60601, 312-814-6026

ROD

BIAGOJEVICH,

GOVERNOR

RENEE

CIPRIANO,

DIRECTOR

217/524-3300

Certified Mail

December 15, 2004

 7002 3150 0000 1220

 576.1

Mr. Gregory S.

Jevyak

Environmental Business Manager

BP Products North America Inc.

301

Evans

 Avenue

P.O.

Box 167

Wood River, Illinois 62095

Re:

1191155009--Madison County

Amoco, Riverfront Property

BP Products North America IncJRiverfront Property

1LD980503 106

LogNo. B-145; 2001-075

Received: April 6,2004& October 8, 2004

RCRAPermit/State Permit File

Dear Mr.Jevyak:

This is in response to two documents submitted to the Illinois EPA regarding investigative

activities being carried out in

a portion ofthe above referenced facility referred to as the

Permitted Non-Hazardous Waste Landfill (PNWL).

The subject submitta.ls were prepared and

submitted on your behalfby Mr.

Ryan P.

Hartley, P.E., and Frederick W. Johnson, P.E., of URS.

As you know, the Illinois EPA issued a permit for this unit on April 26,

1986

(Permit

1986-03-

DE).

Several supplemental permits forthe PNWL have been.issued by the Illinois EPA since

1986.

In addition, on November 4,

1993., the Illinois EPA issued a RCRA permit to Amoco Oil

Company (n’ow known as BP Products North America Inc.

(BP)), which required evaluation of

several solid waste management units (SWMUs) in the

vicinity

ofthe landfill.

The documents being responded to in this letter are as follows:

A submittal entitled, Compliance Commitment Agreement Additional Information

Requested, dated April

6, 2004, which addresses deficiency comments for the Compliance

Commitment Agreement related to the Violation Notice L-2000-0 1288.

All deficiency

comments are related to exceedances ofClass I Groundwater

Quality Standards detected

during a May 3-4, 2000 split sampling event with the faniuity.

A submittal entitled, Compliance Commitment Agreement Additional Information

Requested, dated October, 2004, in which thefacility responds to recommendations made

the Illinois

EPA

regarding statistical

analyses

for the

PNWL

and

associated

ROCK~ORO

—4302

North

Main

Street,

Rockford,

61103— (81

EXHIBIT

Harrison

St.,

Des

Plaines,

60016— (847) 294-4000

ELCIN

—595

South

State,

EIgIB,

1L 60123 —(847) 608:

St., Peoria,

61614— (309) 693-5463

BUREAU

t.AND

PEORIA

—

7620 N.

University St.,

Peoria,

61614—

(30

South

First Street,

Champaign,

IL 61820 —(217) 278-5800

SPRINOfIELO

—45005.

Sixth Street

Rd.,

Springfield,

62706—1217

iMall

Street,

CoIiinsviIIe,

IL 62234 —(618) 346-5120

MARION

—

2309W. Main

993-7200

01/18/05

 TUE 17:36

FAX

312

 939 0162

 URS-CHICAGO

 ~004

Page2

groundwater, also related to a deficiency comment for

 the ComplianceCommitment

Agreement related to the

Violation Notice L-2000-0 1288.

The above subject submittals were reviewed as requests to modify the approved RCRA corrective

action program for the BP Riverfront property and are hereby approved subject to the following

conditions and modifications:

The illinois EPA has determined that the post-closure care period forthe PNWL started

June

15, 1995.

Post-closure care for the PNWL must continue for at least fifteen

(15)

years following that date.

BP has a RCRA permit and is requiredto conduct corrective action, as necessary, on the

SWMUs at the facility.

As such, post-closure care ofthe PNWL shall be carried out

under the provisions of BP’s RCRA permit.

BP shall not submit any additional

applications for supplemental permits

to address required modifications to the approved

post-closure care program; rather, suchmodifications must be submitted as requests to

modifythe approved RCRA corrective action program for the landfill.

The Illinois EPA has determined that the PNWL post-closure groundwater monitoring

program will remain subject to the requirements established under 35

111. Adm. Code, Part

807, and as specified in Attachments A, B,

and C ofthis illinois EPA response.

supplemental solid waste permit will no longer be issued for groundwater activities.

All

future groundwater activities at the PNWL will be carried out under the corrective action

provisions (SectionV) ofthe facility’s RCRA permit.

Based on inforrnation submitted by the facility, the Illinois EPA has determined that

chromium, mercury, silver, and phenols were all detected within the leachate.

Therefore,

the facility must continue to monitor these parameters withinthe

sampling program.

In the illinois EPA deficiency Comment 4 faxed July

25,

 2001, well G109 was one ofthe

wells listed as having exceedances.

However, it has been determined that well Gi 09

is an

upgradient well that

is not within the PNWL monitoring network, and

 should not be

addressed within the deficiency comments.

BP discussed well 0119, rather thanwell

0109, which has no

exceedance issue.

Therefore, monitoring wells 0109 and 0119

not require any further

 investigation at

this time.

Based on information submitted by the

facility, it

haabeen determined that iron and

manganese exceedances in monitoring well 0126

do not require any further investigation

at this time.

The Illinois EPA concurs with the facilitythat the current detection monitoring program

may need to be adjusted to

consider the variable

groundwater flow conditions now known

to be present at the PNWL.

However, due to the recent installation ofthe sheet pile wall

01/18/05

 TUE 17:37 FAX 312

 939 0162

 URS-CHICACO

005

Page3

along the Mississippi River Seep Area (Parcel 0), the facility must continue groundwater

monitoring and the collection ofgroundwater elevation levels to determine the effects of

the sheet pile wall on groundwater flow direction in the PNWL area for an athi.itional four

(4) consecutive quarters

after the receipt ofthis Illinois EPAresponse.

a.-

After the collection ofgroundwater data from the four (4) consecutive quarters

following the date ofthe Illinois EPA letter, the facilitymust present the findings

in a report to the Illinois EPA with any recommendations for the PNWL area,

which must include;

Background values for the PNWL area established in accordance with

Attachment A ofthis

Illinois EPA response based on the four (4) consecutive

quarterly sampling events collected after the receiptofthis letter;

ii.

An assessnlent that more adequatelydefmes the position ofeach monitoring

well withinthe monitoring network in relation

groundwater flow direction.

Based on these findings, a new proposal for monitoring wells designated as

upgradient may be submitted;

iii.

At least four (4) consecutive quarterly potentiometric maps that correspond to

the investigation of current groundwater flow direction;

iv.

A proposal to designate an existing or newmonitoring well(s) as representative

of upgradient conditions

screened within the uppermostaquifer due to the fact

that all wells currently designated as upgradient to the PNWL are screened

within the perched zone.

The groundwater monitoring well 0121

shows exceedances ofsulfate and TDS, and well

Gt23 shows exceedances of nickel and TDS.

These

exceedances must be investigated

after background values for the PNWL area havebeen established in accordance with

Attachment A ofthis Illinois EPA response.

The Illinois EPA has determined at this time that it cannot approve the facility’s request to

designate the perched groundwater zone at the PNWL as a 35

III. Adm.

Code 620.220,

Class II Groundwater due to the following:

During the October 3, 2001

meetingbetween representatives ofthe illinois EPA

and the facility, the Illinois EPA directed the facility to conduct yield tests at all of

the PNWL perched zone monitoring wells.

While the facility acknowledged this

directive in its e-mail attachment entitled, “PNWL Meeting Notes BP-Amc~co

—

Wood River, October 3, 2001” summarizing the October 3,2001

meeting, the

facility did not present any such data with the subject submittais,

and

apparently

has not conducted yield tests at the wells in question.

01/18/05

 TUE 17:38 FAX 312 939 0162

 URS-CHICAGO

 ~006

Page4

Several measures ofthe central tendency (mean, median, and

geometric mean) of

the hydraulic conductivity values (K) forthe eight monitoring wells used in the

Class II demonstration are very close to the Class I criteria of

x l0~cmlsec.

The

Illinois EPA has determined that the yield tests

data discussed in Comment 9.a.

above is essential to make an appropriate groundwater classification

determination.

10.

Ifthe facility wishesto pursue a35 Ill. Adm. Code

620.220, Class II Groundwater

determination for the PNWL area, it must submit a revised demonstration that includes the

information discussed in

Condition 9

above.

This revised determination must be

submitted within 90 days ofthe date ofthe Illinois EPA response.

11.

While the facility may pursue the establishment of an Environmental LandUse Control

(ELUC) to restrict groundwater use at the PNWL,

an ELUC is not appropriateto address

the groundwater quality exceedances associated with the unit.

The exceedances must be

addressed by way ofbackground establishment required in Attachment A ofthis letter, or

by way ofan adjusted standard approved by the Illinois Pollution Control Board.

12.

The Attachments A, B,

and C to this Illinois EPA response provides an updated versionof

the groundwater monitoring requirements for the PNWL based on the currentmonitoring

requirements for 35 Ill. Adin.

Code, Part 807 Landfills.

The requirements are effective

uppn the date ofthe Illinois EPA response.

13.

The facility shall submit a completed “RCRA Facility Groundwater, Leachate and

Gas

Reporting Form” (LPC

592)

as a cover sheet for any notices or reports required by the

PNWL

groundwater monitoring program for identificationpurposes.

Only one copy of

the LPC

592

must accompanyyour submittal.

However, the Pennittee must submit one

(I) original and (excluding the groundwater and leachate monitoring results submitted in

an electronic format) a minimum oftwo (2) copies ofeach notice or report you submit to

the-Illinois EPA.

The fonn is

to be usedfor permit modification requests.

14.

The facility may contact the illinois EPA to schedule a meeting regarding this

 illinois

EPA response.

This

letter shall constitate Illinois EPA’s final decision on the subject submittal.

Within 35

days

ofthe date ofmailing oftheIllinois

EPA’s final decision, the applicant may petition for a hearing

before the Illinois Pollution Control Board to contest the decision ofthe Illinois EPA, however,

the 35-dayperiod for petitioning for a hearing may be extended for a period of time not to exceed

ninety days by written notice provided to the Board from the applicant

and

the Illinois EPA

withinthe 35-day initial appeal period.

Work required by this letter, your

submittal

or the regulations may also be subject to other laws

governing professional services, such as the

Illinois Professional Land Surveyor Act of 1989, the

01/18/05

 TUE 17:39

FAX

312

 939 0162

 URS-CHICAGO

007

Page

Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Professional Geologist Licensing Act,

and the

Structural Engineering Licensing Act of 1989.

This letter does not relieve anyone from

compliance with these laws and the regulations adopted pursuant to these laws.

All workthat

falls within the scope and definitions ofthese laws must be

performed in compliance with them.

The illinois EPA may refer any discovered violation ofthese laws to the appropriate regulating

authority.

Should you have any questions concerning groundwater-related aspects ofthis letter,please

contactAmy Boley at 217/558-4716.

Questions about any other aspects ofthis letter should be

directed to Munib Ahmad, P.E., at 217/524-3263.

Sincerely,.._—~

Joyce L. Munie/P.E.

Manager, Permit Section

Bureau ofLand

JLM:MA:bjb~D4~l

72s.doc

j~~)

Attachments:

Attachment A

—

PNWL Monitoring Requirements

Attachment B

—

Method for Calculation ofConfidence Limits

Attachment C

—

Formatting Requirements for Electronic Reporting of

Groundwater Monitoring Data

cc:

Ryan Hartley, URS Corporation

Frederick Johnson, URS Corporation

Madison County Planning and Development

-01/18/05

 TUE 17:39

 FAX 312

 939 0162

 URS—CHICAGO

~_io08

ATTACHMENT A

PNWL Monitoring Program

To identify any releases from the facility and demonstrate compliance with the applicable

groundwater quality standards, the groundwater monitoring program is approved as follows:

The

monitoring program must be

capable ofdetermining background groundwater quality

hydraulically upgradient of and unaffected by the units and to detect any discharge of

contaminants from any part of a potential source of discharge from theunits.

The illinois

EPA reserves the right to require installation ofadditional monitoring wells

as may be

necessary to satisfy the requirements ofthis permit.

The groundwater monitoring program shall include consistent sampling and analysis

procedures to assure that monitoring results will provide a reliable indication of

groundwater quality in the zone being monitored.

Thepermittee shall sample all groundwater monitoring points, for all potential sources of

contamination on a quarterly basis in accordance with Condition No. 23 including a

minimum of fifteen (15) years after certification ofclosure.

The permittee shall tise the methods in AttachmentB

or propose for Illinois EPA

approval, a more appropriate method to statistically evaluate the groundwater monitoring

data.

The selected method must provide for statistical comparisons betweenupgradient

and downgradient groundwater quality data and

a reasonable balance between the

probability of obtaining Type I (false positive) and Type II (false negative) errors.

The

Type I error rate must be no less than 1

percent.

The proposal must consider the

gathering ofa background data set (from upgradient wells),~

sufficient to provide an

accurate

representationofthe variability in the quality ofgroundwater that is unaffected

byoperations at the facility, and to

assure that the selected test has a reasonable chance of

detecting releases should they occur.

For each sampling event,

using

the methods in Condition No. 4 above, the permittee must

determine if a significant change in groundwater quality has occurred by:

Comparing sample results from eachdowngradient well to the pooled background

data.

Thebackground for each hydrogeologic zone shall be established by pooling

all upgradient well data taken from that zone during the first year.

This

comparisonmust be performed for each parameter for each well;

The petmittee shall conclude that a significant change in groundwater quality has occurred

ifthe results of the evaluation in Condition No.

above indicate that the value for any

parameter exceeds:

The background value established for that parameter at the 99

confidencelevel;

01/18/05

TUE

 17:40 FAX 312

 939 0162

 URS-CHICAGO

‘

 ~OO9

Page 2

The Class I groundwater quality standards listed in Subpart D of35

ilL Adm.

Code 620 Standards (this class applies until an adequate demonstration has been

made by the Permittee that another class applies pursuant to

Subpart B of35

Ill.

Adm. Code 620

Standards); or

For organic parameters two (2) times the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) for a

single parameter or any two (2) or moreparameters exceed the PQL in the same

well.

Within forty-five (45) days ofthe original sample date, the permittee ~y

resample and

test the determination made in Condition No. 6 above.

Ifthe evaluation ofthe resample

result confirms the determination made in Condition No. 6 above, the permittee must

conclude that a significant change in groundwater quality has occurrecL

In the

event a signiflc~nt

change in groundwater quality has occurred or has been

confirmed, the permittee

shall:

Notify the illinois EPA, Division of Land Pollution Control, Permit Section, in

writing, within ten (10) days ofthe change in groundwater quality, identifying

each well and eachparameter;

b.;

Submit an assessment monitoring plan within thirty (30) days ofthe significant

change as determined in

Condition No.

6 or Condition No. 7 above in the form of

a supplemental permit application.

The assessment monitoring plan shall include

appropriate methods for determining the source of the increase, the potential

threat to human health and the environment and the concentration and extent-of

the contaminants if any.

The assessment monitoring plan shall, at a minimum,

include expanded sampling requirements for the affected well(s) and shall be

implemented within thirty (30) days of approval from the Illinois EPA.

Submit assessment report, based on and including the data and information

generated from the completion of Condition No.

8b above to the Illinois EPA

within ninety

(90) days ofapproval ofthe assessment monitoring plan.

Propose a corrective action plan if assessment monitoring indicates that the

facility has impacted groundwater.

The corrective action plan shall

be submitted

within thirty (30) days of approval ofthe assessment report required by Condition

8c above in the form of a supplemental -permit application and include

appropriate

response action to

address any impact ofthe

facility.

The planshall be

implemented within thirty (30) days of Illinois EPA approval.

01/18/05

TUE

 17:40 FAX 312 939

0162

 URS-CHICAGO

 ~01o

Page3

All monitoring wells shall be constructed in a manner that maintains the integrity ofthe

bore hole and prevents contamination ofthe samples and groundwater.

The casing

material shall be inert so as not to affect the water sample.

10.

Apadlocked

protective cover must be installed over the portion ofthe well casing

extending above the ground surface to protect against damage.

11.

Wells shall be easilyvisible and identified with the illinois EPA monitoring point

designation.

12.

Should any well become consistently dry or unserviceable, a replacementwell shall be

provided withinten (10) feet ofthe existing well.

This well shall monitor the same zone

as the existing well and constructed in accordance withthe current Illinois EPA

groundwater monitor well construction standards

at the time that the wells are replaced.

A replacementwell which is more than ten (10) feet from the existing well or which does

no~i

monitor the same geologic zone must be approved via a Supplemental Permit and

designated as a new well.

13.

Within sixty (60) days of installation ofany groundwater and/or leachate monitoring well,

boring logs compiled by a qualified geologist, well development data and- as-built

diagrams shall be submitted to the Illinois EPA utilizing the enclosed “Well Completion

Report” form.

For eachwell installed pursuant to

this permit one form must be

co~inpleted.As-built diagrams, for each monitoring point installed, shall include the

horizontal location to the nearest 0.1

foot (grid coordinates), the type and inner diameter

ofcasing material used, type and length ofscreen packing’material used, type and length

ofseals used, type ofbackfill used, finishing details, groundwater levels, elevation of

stick-up (top ofcasing), ground surface elevation, bottom elevation, interval screened and

screen slot size and depth.

All elevations or levels are to be measured and reported to the

nearest 0.01

foot MSL.

14.

All borings/wells not used as monitoring points shall be backfilled in accordance with the

attached illinois EPA monitor well plugging procedures.

15.

The illinois EPA shall be notified in writing at least fifteen (15) days prior to the

installation ofall new and replacement monitoring wells.

All newly requiredmonitoring

wells should be installed within sixty (60) days ofthe issuance ofthis permit.

16.

Surveyed elevation ofstick-up is to be reported when the well is installed (with as-built

dingrams)

and every two (2) years,

or whenever the elevation changes.

17.

The following monitoring points are to be used in the groundwater monitoring program

for this facility.

These monitoring points supersede all previously required monitoring

points arid representthe entire list ofmonitoring points now required for this facility.

ç)1/18/05

 TUE 17:41 FAX 312

 939 0162

 URS-CHICAGO

 ~J011

Page4

Applicant

Designation

Illinois EPA Designation

RL-lO

G119

SA-1

G121+

SA-2

G122+

SA-3

G123

SA-4

G124

SA-5

G125

SA-6

G126

RL-llS

OilS

•

RL-12S

G12S

RL-13S

G13S+

SA-7S

GO7S

represents upgradient monu1~oring

point(s)

# represents monitor point(s) added to the monitoring program

represenls monitor point(s) deleted from the monitoring program

18.

The concentration orvalues for the parameters contained in Lists

1, 2, and

shall be

determined for samples collected from the groundwater monitoring points and reported

according to the schedule in Condition No.

23 and

evaluatedin accordance

with

Condition

No.

LIST

FIELD PARAMETERS

STORET NUMBER

*Bottorn ofWell Elevation (ft. ref MSL)

72020

Depth to Water (ft. below land surface)

72019

Depth to Water (ft.

from measuringpoint)

72109

Elevation ofGroundwater Surface (ft. ref MSL)

71993

pH (units, unfiltered)

00400

Specific Conductance (umhos/cm, unfiltered)

00094

Temperature ofWater

Sample (deg F)

00011

Reported Annually)

LIST 2

PQL (ug/L unless

ROUTINE INDICATOR PARAMETERS

STORET NUMBER

otherwise noted)

FILTERED

Ammonia as (N) Diss (mgfL)

00608

—

(mg/L)

Arsenic As,

Diss (ug/L)

01000

5.0

Cadmium Cd, Diss

(ug/L)

01025

•

2,0

01/18/05

 TUE 17:42 FAX 312 939

0162

 URS-CHICAGO

•

 ~012

Page

Chloride Cl, Diss (mg/L)

•

00941

1.0 (mg(L)

Iron Fe, Diss (ug/L)

01046

40.0

Lead Pb, Diss (ug/L)

01049

5.0

Manganese Mn, Diss (ug/L)

01056

15.0

Mercury Hg, Diss

(ug/L)

71890

0.2

Sulfate S04, Diss (mg/L)

00946

1.0 (mg/L)

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS,

mg/L)

70300

10.0 (mg/L)

UNFILTERED

Cyanide CN, Total

(mgfL)

00720

0.1

(mg/L)

Phenols

(Total Recoverable) (ug/L)

32730

15.0

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (mg/L)

00680

Total Organic Halogens (TOX) (ugIL)

78115

LIST 3-- INORGANIC ANt~ORGANICANNUAL PARAMETERS SOURCE:

35111. Adm.

Code 620.410

INORGANIC PARAMETERS

-Constituent

(Unfiltered, ug/L

PQL (ug/L unless

unless otherwise noted)

STORET

otherwisenoted)

Antimony

01097

3.0

Arsenic

01002

5.0

Barium

01007

20.0

Beryllium

01012

2.0

Boron

01022

Cadmium

01027

2.0

Chloride (mg/L)

00940

1.0 (mg/L)

Chromium

01034

7.0

Cobalt

01037

50.0

Copper

01042

20.0

Cyanide (mgfL)

00720

0.1

(mg/L)

Fluoride (mg/L)

00951

0.1

(mg/L)

Iron

01045

40.0

Lead

01051

5.0

Manganese

01055

15.0

Mercury

71900

0.2

Nickel

01067

40.0

Nitrate as N (mgL)

00620

1.0 (mgfL)

Selenium

01147

5.0

Silver

01077

10.0

Sulfate (mg/L)

00945

1.0 (mg/L)

01/18/05

 TUE 17:42

 FAX 312 939

0162

 URS-CHICAGO.

~JO13

Page6

Thallium

01059

1.0

Total Dissolved Solids

70300

10.0 (mg/L)

Zinc

01092

20.0

ORGANIC PARAMETERS

Parameters

(unfiltered.ugfL’~

STORET

I!QL

(ug/L)

Alachlor*

77825

2.0

Aldicarb

39053

2.0

Atrazine

39033

0.05

Benzene*

34030

0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene

34247

0.2

Carbofuran.

81405

10.0

Carbon Tetrachloride*

32102

1.0

Chlordane*

39350

0.14

Dalapon

38432

1.3

Dichioromethane

34423

0.2

Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

39100

6.0

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloroprdpane

38760

0.2

Dinoseb(DNBP)

81287

0.7

Endothall

38926

10.0

Endrin

39390

0.06

Ethylene

Dibromide (EDB)

77651

0.05

Heptachlor*.

39410

0.04

Heptachior Epoxide*

39420

0.2

Hexachiorocyclopentadiene

34386

-4.0

Lindane (Gamxna-Hexachlor cyclohexane)

39782

0.04

2,4-ID

39730

12.0

ortho-Dichlorobenzene

34536

5.0

para-Dichlorobenzene

34571

5.0

l,2~Dichloroethane*

34531

5.0

1,1-Dichloroethylene

34501

5.0

cis-l,2-Dichloroethylene

77093

5.0

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

34544

5.0

1,2~Dichloropropane*

34541

5.0

Ethylbenzene

78113

5.0

Methoxychior

39480

0.5

Monochlorobenzene (Chlorobenzene)

34301

5;0

Pentachlorophenol*

39032

0.1

Phenols

32730

15.0

Piclorani

39720

0.2

01/18/05

TUE

 17:42 FAX 312 939 0162

 URS—CHICAGO

~I014

Page7

Polychiorinated Biphenyls

(PCBs)

39516

0.5

(as decachloro-bIphenyl)

Simazine

39055

4.0

Styrene

77128

5.0

2,4,5-TP (Silvex)

39760

5.0

Tetrachloroethylene*

34475

0.7

Toluene

34010

5.0

Toxaphene*

39400

2.4

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

34551

10.0

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

34506

5.0

1,1,2-Trich.loroethane

34511

0.5

Trichloroethylene*

39180

1.0

Vinyl Chloride*

39175

1.0

Xylenes

81551

5.0

*Denotes a carcinogen

+Practical Quantjtation Limits (PQLs) as based on GC/MS Methods listed in 35 IAC Subtitle G

Part 724 Appendix I

19.

The following points are to

be used in the leachate monitoring program forthis

facility.

LEACHATE

MONITORING POINTS

Applicant Designation

Illinois EPA Desigiiation

Sump

L301

Sump2

L302

Sump3

L303

Sump4

L304

Suxnp5

L305

Sump6

L306

Sump7

L307

Sump

L308

Sump9

L309

Sump

L310

Sumpll

L3l1

Sump

L312

Sump

L313

West Discharge

L314

East Discharge

L3 15

01/18/05

TUE

 17:43 FAX

 312 939 0162

 URS—CHICAGO

 ~015

Page8

represents monitor point(s)

added to the monitoring program

represents monitoring point(s) deleted from the monitoring program

20.

The concentrations orvalues for the parameters contained in List 4A, 4B, and 4C shall be

determined for samples collected from the leachate

monitoring points and reported

according to the schedule in Condition No. 23.

LIST4A

Cotistituent

STORET Number

Temp. ofLeachate Sample DEG F

00011

(fieldmeasured)

Specific Conductance (SC) UMHOS

00094

(fieldmeasured)

pH STD. UNITS (field measured)

00400

Leachate Surface Elevation, FT. REF MSL

71993

BTM of Well Elev FT. REF MSL

72020

Depth to Leachate Level from

72109

Measuring Point FT.

LIST4B

Inorganic Chemical Constituents

(Unfiltered ug/Lunless

otherwise-noted)

STORET

Antimony

01097

Arsenic (mgIL)

01002

Barium

01007

Beryllium

01012

Boron

01022

Cadmium

01027

Chloride (mg/L):

00940

Chromium

01034

Cobalt

01037

Copper

01042

Cyanide (mg/L)

00720

Fluoride

00951

Iron

01045

L~ac1

01051

Manganese

01055

Mercury

71900

01/18/05

 TUE 17:43

 FAX 312 939 0162

 URS—CHICAGO

~J0i6

Page9

Nickel

01067

Nitrate asN(mg/L)

00620

Selenium

01147

Silver

01077

Sulfate (mg/L)

t)~0945

Thallium

01059

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) (mgIL)

70300

Zinc

01092

LIST4C..

Organic Chemical Constituents

Constituent

(Unfiltered. ug/L)

STORET

Alachlor*

77825

Akiicarb

39053

Atrazine

39033

Benzene*

34030

Benzo(a)pyrene

34247

Carbofuran

81405

Carbon

Tetrachloride*

32102

Chlordane*

39350

Dalapon

38432

Dfchloromethane

34423

Di(2.-ethylhexyl)phthalate

39100

1 ,2-Dibromo-3 -cliloropropane

38760

Dinoseb (DNBP)

81287

Endothall

38926

Endrin

39390

Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)

77651

Heptachlor*

39410

Heptachior

Epoxide*

39420

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

34386

Lindane (Gamma-Hexachior cyclohexane)

39782

2,4-D

39730

ortho-Dichlorobenzene

34536

para-Dichlorobenzene

34576

1 ,2~Dich1oroethan.e*

34531

1 ,1-Dichloroethylene

34501

cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene

77093

frans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

34546

01/18/05

 TUE 17:44 FAX 312 939

0162

 URS-CHICAGO

 ~O17

Page

,2~Dichloropropane*

34541

Ethylbenzene

781-13

Methoxychior

39480

Monochlorobenzene (Chloroben.zene)

34301

Pentachlorophenol*

39032

Phenols

32730

Picloram

39720

Polychiorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

39516

(as decachloro~bipheny1)*

Simazine

39055

Styrene

77128

2,4,5-TP (Silvex)

39760

Tetrachioroethylene*

34475

Toluene

34010

Toxaphene*

39400

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

34551

1 ,1,1-Trichloroethane

34506

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

34511

Trichloroethylene*

39180

Vinyl Chloride*

39175

Xylenes

81551

*Denotes a carcinogen

NOTE:

Indicate what is being used as the measuring point in the Collector Comment

section ofthe Chemical Analysis form.

NOTE:

Leachate samples are not to be filtered.

Constituent

(Unfiltered, ug/L)

STORET Number

Arsenic

01002

Barium

01007

Benzene

34030

Cadmium

01027

Carbon Tetrachloride

32102

Chiordane.

39350

Chloroben.zene

34301

Chloroform

32106

Chromium

01034.

o-Cresol

77152

m’Cresol

77151

p-Cresol

77146

01/18/05

 TUE 17:44 FAX 312

939

0162

 URS—CHICAGO.

 E~O18

Page

2,4-D

39730

1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene

34571

I,2-Dichioroethane

34531

1,1 -Dichloroethylene

34501

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

34611

Endrin

39390

Heptachior Epoxide

39420

Hexacblorobenzene

39700

Hexachlorobutadiene

39702

Hexachioroethane

34396

Lead

01051

Lindane

39782

Mercury

71900

Mithoxyclor

39480

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

81595

Nitrobenzene

34447

Pentach.Iorophenol

39032

Pyridine

77045

Selenium

01147

Silver

01077

Tetrachloroethylene

34475

Toxaphene

39400

Trichioroethylene

39180

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

77687

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

34621

2,4,5-TP

(Silvex)

39760

Vinyl Chloride

39175

21.

AlL monitoring points shall be maintained in

accordance

with the approved permit

application such that the required samples and measurements maybe obtained.

22.

Sampling should

commence concunently with issuance ofthe permit.

Statistical

evaluations should be performed for all parameters that have an established background.

The established background should be taken over one year and include at least 4 sampling

events.

The parameter list included with this permit supersedes any previous list.

The

first quarterly statistical evaluations shall be performed on samples taken during the

months of Januray-February 2005

and. the results submitted to the illinois EPA by

January

15,

2006.

23.

The schedule for sample collection and submission ofquarterly monitoring results is as

follows:

01/18/05

 TUE 17~44

FAX

3.1.2

939

0162

URS-CHICAGO

~1019

Page

Sampling Quarter

Sampling Due

ReportDue Date

Jan-Feb (1st)

List

1, 2, 4A

April 15

April-May (2nd)

List

1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C

July-15

July-Aug (3rd)

List 1, 2, 4A

October

Oct-Nov (4th)

List 1, 2,

4A, 4B, 4C

January. 15

Field Parameters

2- Indicator Parameters

Annual Parameters

Leachate Field Parameters

Leachate Monitoring Parameters

24.

Annually, the operator shall prepare an assessment ofthe monitoring program which shall

inglude an evaluation ofthe groundwater flow direction and the hydraulic gradients atthe

facility.

This assessment shall be submitted with the monitoring results due on July 15.

25.

 Information required

by Conditions 18

and 23 in AttachmentA must be submitted in an

electronic format.

The information is to be submitted, as fixed-widthtext files formatted

as found in Attachment C.

Additional guidance regarding the submittal of the

information in an electronic format can be found atwww.epa.state.il.us/landlwaste-

mgmt/groundwater-monitoring.html

JLM:MA:bjh\04 1 72s.doc

01/18/05

 TUE 17:45 FAX

312

939 0162

 URS-CIIICAGO

 ~020

ATTACHMENT B

This method should be used to predict the confidence limit when single groundwater

samples are taken from each monitoring (test) well.

Determine

the arithmetic mean (Xb) of each indicator parameter for the

background sampling period.

Ifmore than one background (upgradient) well is

Xb=XI+X2+.-.+xflh/n

used, an equal number ofsamples must be taken from eachwell.

Where:

Average background value for a given chemical parameter

Background values for eachupgradient sample

the number of background samples taken

Calculate the backgroundvariance (Sb2) and standard deviation (Sb) for each

parameter using the values (Xc) from eachbackground

sample ofthe upgradient

—2

(x1

—

Xi,)

(X2

—

Xi,)

...

—

x~)

JIn

-1

well(s) as follows:

=xb+(tul+J/n)(Sb)

Sb--~J~

Calculate the upper confidence limit using the following formula:

Where:

upper confidence limit prediction

(upper and lower limits should be calculated forpH)

one-tailedt value atthe required significance

level

and at n-i

degrees offreedom from Table

(a two-tailedt value should be used for pH)

Ifthe values ofany routine parameter for any monitoring well exceeds the upper

confidence limit for that parameter, the permittee shall conclude that a statistically

significant change has occurred at that well.

01/18/05

 TUE 17:45 FAX 312

 939 0162

URS-CHICAGO

021

When some of-the background

(upgradient) values are less than the Method

DetectionLimit (MDL), a value ofone-half (2) the MDL shall be

substituted for

each background value that

is reported as less than the MDL.

All other

computations shall be calculated as given above.

If all the background (upgradient) values are less than the MDL for a given parameter, the

Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL), as given in 35 Ill. Adm.

Code Part 724 Appendix I

shall be used to evaluate data from monitoring wells.

Ifthe analyticalresults from any

monitoring well exceeds two (2) times the PQL for any single parameter, or if they exceed

the PQLs fortwo or more parameters, thepermittee

shall conclude that a statistically

significantchange has occurred.

Degrees offreedom

Table

Standard T-Tables Level of Significance

t-values

(one-tail)

—

t-values

(two_tail)*

4.541

2.353

5.841

3.182

3.747

2.132

4.604

2.776

3.365

2.015

4.032

2.571

3.143

1.943

3.707

2.447

2.998

1.895

3.499

2.365

2.896

1.860

3.355

 2.306

2.821

1.833

3.250

2.262

2.764

1.812

3.169

2.228

2.718

1.796

3.106

2.201

2.681

1.782

3.055

2.179

13

 2.650

 1.771

 3.012

 2.160

14

 2.624

 1.761

 2.977

 2.145

2.602

1.753

•

 2.947

 2.13 1

16

 2.583

 1.746

 2.921

 2.120

17

 2.567

 1.740

 2.898

 2.110

18

 2.552

 1.734

 2.878

 2.101

19

 2.539

 1.729

 2.861

 2.093

20

2.528

1.725

2.845

 2.086

2.518

1.721

2.831

2.080

2.508

1.717

2,819

2.074

2.500

1.714

2.807

2.069

•

2.492

1.711

 2.797

 2.064

25

 2.485

 1.708

 2.787

 2.060

30

 2.457

 1.697

 2.750

 2.042

40

 2.423

 1.684

 2.704

 2.021

For pH

only

 when required.

Adopted from Table

III of“Statistical Tables for Biological Agricultural and Medical Research”

(1947. R.A. Fisher and F. Yates).

REVISED 1/97

(VMB)

BJB:mls\023

5

12s.doc

01/18/05

 TUE 17:46 FAX 312 939 0162

 URS-CHICAGO

1~J

022

‘‘1

ATTACHMENT C

Formatting Requirements for the 01 Record of the Electronically Submitted

Groundwater and Leachate Data (the 01 Record portion of the LPC-160 is included

for example purposes)

rnT,TNOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DIVISION

OP LAND

POLLUTION CONTROL

l’sigc

CEEMICAL ANALYSIS

FORM

REcoitr)

 TRANS

CODE

COE

!LIPIC~SIMIOI1I

—

— ———————

—

— — —

REPORTDUEDE_._.J_J__

— — — — — — — — — — —

— —

—

— ii

SFrE INVENTORY NUMBER

—

MONITOR POINT

NUM3ER

—

soc loats-ucUona)

REGION ________CO.

____________________

DATE COLLECTED__.J__

IJM

FACILITY ~AMB

FOR IEPA USE ONLY

BACKGROUND SAMPLE (X)

______

TIME

COLLECTED

—

(24Hr.Clock)

LAB__

UNABLE TO COLLECT SAMPLE

(aec Inatruetiona)

DATE

RECEIVED

._.J_..J~

—

MONITORPOINT

SAMPLED

_____________

(.ee

Inntmctiaoa)

OTHER (SPECIFY)

SAMPLE FIELD FILTERED

—

INORGANICS CX)

_____

ORGANICS CX)

SAMPLE APPEARANCE

CoL.LECrORCOMMENTS

103

142

LABCOMMENTS

L5~1

199

11.5321213

LPC

160 01/90

Thia

Agencyis

authorized

require this information

under Illinois Revised Statutes,

1979,

Chapter

111

4, Section

100-4

and

1021.

Disclosure

this

information

required.

Failure

so do so may

result

a civil penalty

to $2S,000

foreach

day

the

failure

continue, a fine

$1,000.00

and

imprisonment

one

year.

This

form has been

approved by the

Forms

Management

Center.

All analytical procedures

must

performed

accordance

wittt

the

method,

contained

“TestMethods for

Evaluating Solid

Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods,”

SW-846,

3f4

Editioc, September

1986

equivalent

methods

approved by the Agency.

Proper

sample chain

of custody

control and quality assurence/quaiity

control

procedures

must be maintained in

accordance

with

—

the

facility

sampling

and analysis

plan.

Page 1

of3

01/18/05

 TUE 17:46 FAX 312

939

0162

 URS-CHICACO

E~1023

ATTACHMENT C

(con’t.)

“Only

Keypunch with Data in Column 35 or Columna 38-47

KEY:

Spaces Numbered

Description

Format

Spaces 1-7

Record Code

LPCSMO1

Space

Trans Code

Spaces

9-18

Site ID

0000000000

Spaces

19-22

Mon Pt ID

0000

Spaces 23-28

Date Collected

000000

Space 29

Lab

Spaces 30-35

Filler

Spaces 36-41

Report Due Date

000000

Spaces 42-47

Date Received

000000

Spaces 48-53

Filler 2

Space 54

Background Sample

Spaces

55-5

Time Collected

0000

Space

Unable to CollectSample

Space 60

Monitoring

Point Sampled By

Space

Field

Filtered— Inorganic

Space 62

Field Filtered

—

Organic

Spaces 63-102

Sample Appearance

Spaces

103-142

Collector Comnients

Spaces

143-149

Filler 3

Spaces

150-199

Lab

Comments

Page

2 of 3

01/18/05

TUE

 17:46 FAX 312

 939 0162

 URS-CHICAGO

 l~O24

ATTACHMENT

(con’t.)

Formatting Requirements for the02

Record

ofthe Electronically Submitted

Groundwater

and Leachate Data (the 02 Record portion ofthe LPC-160 is included for example

purposes)

RECORD

CODE

TRANS

CODE

J~J

(COLUMNS 9-29

FROM ABOVE)

FIELD MEASUREMENTS

CONSTLTUENT

DESCRIPTION AND

REQUIRED UNIT

OP MEASURE

STOBET

NUMBER

VALUE

TEMP

WATER

(unfiltered

°F)

‘1~i~

‘7

SPEC

COND

(unfiltered

umhos)

00094

(unfilted

units)

ELEV

SURF (ft

ref

MSL)

..111..~

DEPTH

WATER

(ft

below

LS)

BTM

WELL

ELEV

(ft

ref

MSL)

L2..Q.2..O

—

DEPTH

WATER

MEA

(ft)

7_1..I..Q.~

————__—

—

————_

———_—

IL 532 1213

U’C 160

01/90

This

Agency is

authorized

require this informatioo under illinois

Revised Statutes,

1979,

Chapter

Ill

Section

1004

and

1021.

Disclosure ofthis information is required.

Failure

to do so

may resuit in acivil penalty

up to $25,000 for each day the

failure

continues a fine

up to 31,000.00

and

imprisonment upto one year.

This formhas

been

approved by the

Forsne

Management Center.

All analytical procedures mual

performed in accordance with the methods

contained in “Test Methods

for

Evaluating Solid Wastes,

Physical/Chemical

Methods,”

SW-846,

Edition,

September 1986 or equivalent

methods

approved

by the Agency.

Proper

sample chain of

custody content

and quality ansurance/quaiity

conteol procedures

must be maintained

accordance

with the

thcility sampling

and analysis

plan.

“Only

Keypunch with

Data In Column 35 orColumns

38-47

KEY:

Spaces Numbered

Description

Format

Spaces

1-7

Record Code

LPCSMO2

Space

Trans

Code

Spaces

9-18

Site ID

0000000000

Spaces

19-22

Mon -Pt ID

Spaces 23-28

 Date Collected

Space 29

Lab

Spaces 30-34

STORET Number

Space 35

 Remarks

Space 36

 Replicate

Space 37

Space 38-47

Value-

PCE:mls\Ol75ls.doc

Page 3 of 3

01/18/05

 TUE 17:35

FAX

312

939

0162

 URS-CHICAGO

002

URS

January

18,

2005

Mr. John Kim

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Division of Legal

Counsel

1021

North

Grand Avenue East

Springfield, Illinois 62702

Subject: 1191155009— Madison

County

BP Products North America Inc.,

Former

Wood River Refinery Riverfront Property

1LD980503106

Log

No. B-145; 2001-075

RCRA Permit/State Permit File

Dear Mr Kim:

This notification

being submitted

on behalfof BP Products North America

Inc. (BP) to request an

extension to

 file an appeal to the Illinois Pollution Control Board

(IPCB) concerning

the

decisions

noted in the

Illinois

Environmental Protection

Agency

(Illinois EPA) letter to BP dated December 15,

2005. A copy ofthe

 letter, which relates to the above-referenced site, is attached.

 Submittal of this

request

was

discussed

telephone conference between

Illinois

EPA (Ms. Amy Boley, Ms. Tern

Myers, Ms. Gwenyth Thompson and Mr. John Kim)

arid URS Corporation (Mr. Larry Verkoulen, Mr.

Patrick Dunne, Ms. Jia Guo, and Mr. John Dennison) on

January

18,

2005.

Please

call

John

Dennison

312/697-7225

Ryan

Hartley

312/697-7269

if you

have

any

questions on

the information provided.

Sincerely,

Dennison

Ryan Hartley,

P.E.

Project Scientist

Project Manager

Attachment

cc:

Greg Jevyak,

Atlantic

Richfield Company

Joyce

L. Munie,

P.E., Illinois EPA

(iRS

Corporation

122 South

Michigan Avenue.

Suite 1920

Chicago, IL

60603

Tel: 312.939.1000

Fax;

312.939.4198

EXHIBIT

J;a3CO54\RlVl~ItIItONI\PNWI.\IS1

QIRFi COItRl?Sl’UNI)1~NCl~REO1’tiS1

FOR.

FXTEN.SO~’l

AF’I’LA

_I.lX-O~IX)Cfl~-It-1)5

CERTIFICATE

OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned attorney at law, hereby certify that on January

19,

2005,

I served true

and correct copies of a REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION

OF APPEAL PERIOD,

by placing true and

correct copies in properly sealed and addressed envelopes and

 by depositing

said sealed envelopes in

a U.S.

mail drop box located within Springfield,

Illinois, with sufficient

First Class Mail postage affixed thereto, upon the following named persons:

DorothyM.

Gunn, Clerk

John Dennison

Illinois Pollution Control Board

URS Corporation

James R.

Thompson Center

122

South

Michigan Avenue

100 West Randolph Street

Suite

1920

Suite 11-500

Chicago, IL

60603

Chicago, IL 60601

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

John

J~Riiii

Assistant Counsel

Special Assistant Attorney General

Division of Legal Counsel

1021 North Grand Avenue, East

P.O. Box

19276

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276

217/782-5544

217/782-9143 (TDD)