VILLAGE
OF BRIDGEVIEW.
7500
SOUTH OKETO AVENUE
BRIDGEVIEW,
ILLINOIS 60455
708-594-2525
DEC 23
2004
STATE OF ILLINOIS
VILLAGE
PRESIDENT
Pollution Control Board
STEVEN
M.
LANDEK
CLERK
December 21, 2004
7~j)
CLAUDETTE
STRUZIK
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
TRUSTEES
SUite
11-500
WAYNE
F.
GRABINSKI
James
R.
Thomson
Center
NORMA J.
PINION
100 West
Randolph Street
JAMES
A. CECOT~
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
MICHAEL
J.
PTICEK
Re:
Amendments
to 35 IL Adm.
Code
901 and
910 / Docket R03-
MARY M. SU1TON
Proposed New and
Updated Rules
for Measurement
HAROLD
P.
ROBISH
and
Numerical
Sound
Emission
Standards;
Comments
of the
Village of Bridgeview
Mr.
Chairman
and
Members
of the
Board:
Please
be’ advised that
I
am
the
attorney
for the
Village
of’ ~ridgeview
(the
‘9btillage~)‘vfrhich
has
r~viewec1the
pró,posed
rulemaking
in
the
above
~thatter~ári~i
~i~’‘alarthEd~a~~to~ft
~
thi’~urrent
businesses
and
future
developments
within
the
Yillage.
We
are
concerned that
lo’~veringthe bar for evidence ‘of noL~e
~ollution
in private
suits
brought
under
the
Board’s
numeric
noise
standards
and
in
nuisance
actions
will
encourage
unwarranted
legal
actions
before
the
Board
on the basis
of faulty noise measurements
We
have
reviewed
and
concur
with
the
comments
and
testimony
provided
by
John
Henriksen,
Executive
Director
of
the
Illinois
Association
of Aggregate
Producers
(the
“IAAP”),
regarding
Part
910
and support
the alternative
proposed language
offered by the
IAAP.
Specifically,.
1.
We object to the proposed
amendment to Part
910
which does
not require
non-agency
personnel
who
conduct sound
measurements
to
be
trained
and
experienced
in
sound
measurement
techniques
and
equipment
We
note
that
the
Illinois
Environment
Protection
Agency
(the
“TEPA”) rule
containing
the
qualifications
for IEPA personnel
who
conduct
so~indmeas~irements,Section
951
101, provides
Agency
personnel
conducting
sound
meastiremei~its shall
have
been
~trained
arid
experienced
in~ the
current
‘~te~hhi4ue~
á~d’pri~i~l~
~bf~
~oli~d,
éä~ethé~t à~d~’’
‘
A
WELL
BALANCED
GOMMUNITY
the
selection
and
operation
of
sound
measuring
instrumentation.
Although
no
State
approved
licensing
or certification
process exists
for
personnel
who
conduct
sound
measurements,
Part
910
should at
least
incorporate
the
minimal
requirements
outlined
in
Section
951.101.
Given that
data gathered
by non-agency personnel may serve as grounds
for a
nuisance
noise
action
brought
to
the Board
or for
a lawsuit,
such
persons
should
possess
some basic
level
of training
and
experience.
We
concur
with
the
testimony
provided
by
the
IAAP and
Vibra
Tech,
Inc.
that
sound measurements
gathered
by
anyone
without
some
basic level
of training
and experience
are of questionable validity
and should not
be
considered as valid evidence of noise levels by this Board or by a court of
competent
jurisdiction.
Therefore,
we
support
the
IAAP’s
proposed
alternative
language
for
Part 910.101,
stating:
Personnel
who
conduct
sound
measurements
in
order
to
show
comiliance
with
the Board’s
noise
standards
in
Part
900 and
901 must
be trained
and experienced in the current
techniques
and
principles
of sound
measurement
and
in
the
selection
and
operation
of
sound
measuring
instrumentation.
2.
We
object
to new
Section
910.104,
Measurement
Techniques
for
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
900,
which
states
that
while
sound pressure
level
measurements
are not
required
to
establish
a violation
of the
Board’s
nuisance
noise
standard
under
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
900.102,
these
measurements
may
be
used
as
“corroborating
evidence.”
Although
Section
910.104
requires
that
a
person
conducting
sound
pressure
measurements
comply
with
the
instructions
of
the
sound
pressure
measurement
equipment
manufacturer,
the
sound
measurement
techniques
in
Section
910.105
are
considered
only
as
“guidance”
for
gathering
such data.
As stated
on page
5
of the “Proposal
Overview” for
this
rulemaking,
“the
proposed
approach
deviates
from
the
detailed
sound
measurement
requirements
specified
in
Part
951”,
rules
that
govern the
IEPA’s
enforcement
activities
for nuisance
noise.
We
believe
unwarranted
nuisance
actions
pose
a
serious
threat
to
existing
businesses
and
may add unnecessary
cost
and
delay
to future
development, not
only within
the Village, but
elsewhere throughout
the
State.
As
such,
we
see no basis
for allowing
such
actions
to proceed
on
the basis
of evidence that
would not be
allowed in
actions brought by the
IEPA.
We
agree
with
the
IAAP
that
proposed
Section
910.104
compounds
the
problems
created
by
the
lack
of
a
training
and
experience
requirement
for
non-agency
persons
who
conduct
sound
2
measurements.
Sound pressure
measurements
taken
by
persons
with
no training
and
experience
are inherently unreliable.
Of even less value
are measurements
taken
by persons
who
do
not
have
to
comply
with
either Section 910.105 or Section 951.104.
Therefore,
we
support
the
IAAP’s
proposal
that
Section
910.104
be
amended to state as follows:
Sound
pressure
level
measurements
are
not
required
to
establish
a violation
of 35
Ill. Adm.
Code 900.102
(nuisance
noise).
However,
sound
pressure
level
measurements
may
be
introduced
as
corroborating
evidence
when
alleging
a
violation
of 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
900.102.
If sound
pressure
level
measurements
are
collected,
manufacturer’s
instructions
must be followed for the equipment
used and
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
910.105
may
bc
used
as
guidance
in
gathering
data.
In
addition.
sound
measurements
used
to
establish
a violation
of 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
900.102
must
be
obtained
in accordance with
either:
~
35 Iii. Adm. Code 910.105; or
j~
35
Ill. Adm.
Code 951.104.
We thank you very much for your careful
consideration
these
comments
and ask that
they be included in the record of this rulemaking.
in
ent
Cai
kar
Village
Attorney
VC:les
cc:
Hon. Steven
M. Landek, Mayor
3