VILLAGE
    OF BRIDGEVIEW.
    7500
    SOUTH OKETO AVENUE
    BRIDGEVIEW,
    ILLINOIS 60455
    708-594-2525
    DEC 23
    2004
    STATE OF ILLINOIS
    VILLAGE
    PRESIDENT
    Pollution Control Board
    STEVEN
    M.
    LANDEK
    CLERK
    December 21, 2004
    7~j)
    CLAUDETTE
    STRUZIK
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    TRUSTEES
    SUite
    11-500
    WAYNE
    F.
    GRABINSKI
    James
    R.
    Thomson
    Center
    NORMA J.
    PINION
    100 West
    Randolph Street
    JAMES
    A. CECOT~
    Chicago,
    Illinois
    60601
    MICHAEL
    J.
    PTICEK
    Re:
    Amendments
    to 35 IL Adm.
    Code
    901 and
    910 / Docket R03-
    MARY M. SU1TON
    Proposed New and
    Updated Rules
    for Measurement
    HAROLD
    P.
    ROBISH
    and
    Numerical
    Sound
    Emission
    Standards;
    Comments
    of the
    Village of Bridgeview
    Mr.
    Chairman
    and
    Members
    of the
    Board:
    Please
    be’ advised that
    I
    am
    the
    attorney
    for the
    Village
    of’ ~ridgeview
    (the
    ‘9btillage~)‘vfrhich
    has
    r~viewec1the
    pró,posed
    rulemaking
    in
    the
    above
    ~thatter~ári~i
    ~i~’‘alarthEd~a~~to~ft
    ~
    thi’~urrent
    businesses
    and
    future
    developments
    within
    the
    Yillage.
    We
    are
    concerned that
    lo’~veringthe bar for evidence ‘of noL~e
    ~ollution
    in private
    suits
    brought
    under
    the
    Board’s
    numeric
    noise
    standards
    and
    in
    nuisance
    actions
    will
    encourage
    unwarranted
    legal
    actions
    before
    the
    Board
    on the basis
    of faulty noise measurements
    We
    have
    reviewed
    and
    concur
    with
    the
    comments
    and
    testimony
    provided
    by
    John
    Henriksen,
    Executive
    Director
    of
    the
    Illinois
    Association
    of Aggregate
    Producers
    (the
    “IAAP”),
    regarding
    Part
    910
    and support
    the alternative
    proposed language
    offered by the
    IAAP.
    Specifically,.
    1.
    We object to the proposed
    amendment to Part
    910
    which does
    not require
    non-agency
    personnel
    who
    conduct sound
    measurements
    to
    be
    trained
    and
    experienced
    in
    sound
    measurement
    techniques
    and
    equipment
    We
    note
    that
    the
    Illinois
    Environment
    Protection
    Agency
    (the
    “TEPA”) rule
    containing
    the
    qualifications
    for IEPA personnel
    who
    conduct
    so~indmeas~irements,Section
    951
    101, provides
    Agency
    personnel
    conducting
    sound
    meastiremei~its shall
    have
    been
    ~trained
    arid
    experienced
    in~ the
    current
    ‘~te~hhi4ue~
    á~d’pri~i~l~
    ~bf~
    ~oli~d,
    éä~ethé~t à~d~’’
    A
    WELL
    BALANCED
    GOMMUNITY

    the
    selection
    and
    operation
    of
    sound
    measuring
    instrumentation.
    Although
    no
    State
    approved
    licensing
    or certification
    process exists
    for
    personnel
    who
    conduct
    sound
    measurements,
    Part
    910
    should at
    least
    incorporate
    the
    minimal
    requirements
    outlined
    in
    Section
    951.101.
    Given that
    data gathered
    by non-agency personnel may serve as grounds
    for a
    nuisance
    noise
    action
    brought
    to
    the Board
    or for
    a lawsuit,
    such
    persons
    should
    possess
    some basic
    level
    of training
    and
    experience.
    We
    concur
    with
    the
    testimony
    provided
    by
    the
    IAAP and
    Vibra
    Tech,
    Inc.
    that
    sound measurements
    gathered
    by
    anyone
    without
    some
    basic level
    of training
    and experience
    are of questionable validity
    and should not
    be
    considered as valid evidence of noise levels by this Board or by a court of
    competent
    jurisdiction.
    Therefore,
    we
    support
    the
    IAAP’s
    proposed
    alternative
    language
    for
    Part 910.101,
    stating:
    Personnel
    who
    conduct
    sound
    measurements
    in
    order
    to
    show
    comiliance
    with
    the Board’s
    noise
    standards
    in
    Part
    900 and
    901 must
    be trained
    and experienced in the current
    techniques
    and
    principles
    of sound
    measurement
    and
    in
    the
    selection
    and
    operation
    of
    sound
    measuring
    instrumentation.
    2.
    We
    object
    to new
    Section
    910.104,
    Measurement
    Techniques
    for
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    900,
    which
    states
    that
    while
    sound pressure
    level
    measurements
    are not
    required
    to
    establish
    a violation
    of the
    Board’s
    nuisance
    noise
    standard
    under
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    900.102,
    these
    measurements
    may
    be
    used
    as
    “corroborating
    evidence.”
    Although
    Section
    910.104
    requires
    that
    a
    person
    conducting
    sound
    pressure
    measurements
    comply
    with
    the
    instructions
    of
    the
    sound
    pressure
    measurement
    equipment
    manufacturer,
    the
    sound
    measurement
    techniques
    in
    Section
    910.105
    are
    considered
    only
    as
    “guidance”
    for
    gathering
    such data.
    As stated
    on page
    5
    of the “Proposal
    Overview” for
    this
    rulemaking,
    “the
    proposed
    approach
    deviates
    from
    the
    detailed
    sound
    measurement
    requirements
    specified
    in
    Part
    951”,
    rules
    that
    govern the
    IEPA’s
    enforcement
    activities
    for nuisance
    noise.
    We
    believe
    unwarranted
    nuisance
    actions
    pose
    a
    serious
    threat
    to
    existing
    businesses
    and
    may add unnecessary
    cost
    and
    delay
    to future
    development, not
    only within
    the Village, but
    elsewhere throughout
    the
    State.
    As
    such,
    we
    see no basis
    for allowing
    such
    actions
    to proceed
    on
    the basis
    of evidence that
    would not be
    allowed in
    actions brought by the
    IEPA.
    We
    agree
    with
    the
    IAAP
    that
    proposed
    Section
    910.104
    compounds
    the
    problems
    created
    by
    the
    lack
    of
    a
    training
    and
    experience
    requirement
    for
    non-agency
    persons
    who
    conduct
    sound
    2

    measurements.
    Sound pressure
    measurements
    taken
    by
    persons
    with
    no training
    and
    experience
    are inherently unreliable.
    Of even less value
    are measurements
    taken
    by persons
    who
    do
    not
    have
    to
    comply
    with
    either Section 910.105 or Section 951.104.
    Therefore,
    we
    support
    the
    IAAP’s
    proposal
    that
    Section
    910.104
    be
    amended to state as follows:
    Sound
    pressure
    level
    measurements
    are
    not
    required
    to
    establish
    a violation
    of 35
    Ill. Adm.
    Code 900.102
    (nuisance
    noise).
    However,
    sound
    pressure
    level
    measurements
    may
    be
    introduced
    as
    corroborating
    evidence
    when
    alleging
    a
    violation
    of 35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    900.102.
    If sound
    pressure
    level
    measurements
    are
    collected,
    manufacturer’s
    instructions
    must be followed for the equipment
    used and
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    910.105
    may
    bc
    used
    as
    guidance
    in
    gathering
    data.
    In
    addition.
    sound
    measurements
    used
    to
    establish
    a violation
    of 35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    900.102
    must
    be
    obtained
    in accordance with
    either:
    ~
    35 Iii. Adm. Code 910.105; or
    j~
    35
    Ill. Adm.
    Code 951.104.
    We thank you very much for your careful
    consideration
    these
    comments
    and ask that
    they be included in the record of this rulemaking.
    in
    ent
    Cai
    kar
    Village
    Attorney
    VC:les
    cc:
    Hon. Steven
    M. Landek, Mayor
    3

    Back to top