1. ILLINOIS SECTION
  2. AMERICAN WA TER WORKS
  3. ASSOCIATION ~
  4. ~2~W?~Q

l2—~E—O4;
3:-i5pM
8472g5778~#
ILLINOIS SECTION

Back to top


AMERICAN WA TER WORKS

Back to top


ASSOCIATION
~
December 14, 2004
Reply to: Illinois Sectio AW~VA
S35YorkshireDrive
Dekalb,IL 60115
~
Ms. Dorothy M. Gurm, Clerk
~A~FJWNOJs
Illinois Pollution Control Board
~
James R. Thompson Center
°~rd
100 West Randolph Street Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
VIA FAX# 312-814-3669 and USPS
RE: Docket No. R-04-021
Revisions to Radium Water Quality Standards
Dear Ms. Gunn:
The Illinois Water Utility COuncil was formed by the Illinois Section:
1
the
American Water Works Association to evaluate and comment on legislative~.egulatory
arid other matters, which directly affect water utilities. The pending proposal ofthe
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to modify the water quality stand d for
radium directly affects water utilities in Illinois.
The proposal of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency recogri
zes
that
radium has been discharged to surface waters for decades. Many of the utilit es that are
members ofthe American Waterworks Association have been providing dri ing water
to theircommunities for over 100 years. Any water supply using water from the deep
aquiferhas been discharging radium for that same time period.
The proposal ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Agency had be n
characterized as the de-regulation of radium. This is not true. IEPA has rec gnized that
the allowable concentration in streams and rivers in Illinois is two orders of~agnitude
greater than the current standard and the highest concentration ofradium me sured in
well water in Illinois. The establishment of a numerical limit that is two ord s of
magnitude higher than any concentration measured from wells in Illinois wo id not have
any different impact on the waters than the current proposal.

I2—i5~o4; 3:15PM ;
8472957788~ 2
The Water Utility Council is concerned that a specific treatment technique in y be
required for radium if the current standard is left in place. Water utilities ha e
responsibilities to their customers to select a treatment method that best meet the needs
oftheir system. Funds received from the public will be spent to comply wi the
established rules and these funds should be spent wisely. The installation of quipment
to meet a water quality standard of1.0 pico curies per liter ofradium 226 is
ealistic
when the current standard for water delivered to people is
5.0
pico curies per liter of
combined radium 226 and radium 228.
Public water supplies provide potable drinking water for human
COflS:
ption with
radium levels up to 5.0 pico curics that is in full compliance with all drinkin water
regulations. There is no scientific basis to indicate the need for removal ofr dium levels
below 5.0 pico curies from wastewater discharged to the environment. The I linois
Section American Water Works Association supports the IEPA Proposal.
The Illinois Water Utility Council appreciates the opportunity to prov de
comment on this very important issue to water utilities in Illinois.
Very truly yours,

Back to top


~2~W?~Q
F. Edward Glatfelter
Chair
ISAWWA Water Utility Counci
Executive Director
Central Lake County
Joint Action Water Agency

Back to top