~:~GOVERN0R
R.Blagojevich
CHAJRMAN
J
Philip
Novak
SPRINGFIELD OFFICE
~1O21
North
Giand
Ave.
East
P.O. Box
19274
Springfield. IL
62794-9274
217-524-8500
FAX 2l7~524-8508
CHICAGO
OFFICE
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph
Suite
11-500
Chicago,1L 60601
312-814-3620
FAX 312-814-3669
TYY 312-814-6032
CLERK’S OFHCE
DEC
‘~
0
200k
STATE OF ~LL~NO~S
Pollution
ContrO~
Board
Jack Lavin, Director
Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity
620 East Adams Street, S-6
Springfield, Illinois 62704
Re:
Request for Economic Impact Study
for:
Setback Zone for the City of
Marquette Heights Community
Water SuppIy~New
35
111
Adm.
Code 618
(R05
09)
Dear Director Lavin:
The Pollution Control Board (Board) received a rulemaking proposal from
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) on November
5,
2004.
The
Agency seeks to
establish a
1,000 foot setback zone forthe protection ofthe
community water supply wells for the City of Marquette Heights, in Tazwell County.
The Agency’s proposal states that it had received a letter from
the Mayor of
Marquette
Heights in March, 2004 that requested this special designation.
The letter
was accompanied by City resolution requesting an increase in the setback zone.
I am
writing to request that your Department conduct an economic impact study
concerning this proposal.
Since 1998,
Section
27
(b) ofthe Environmental
Protection Act has required
the Board to:
1)
“request that the Department ofCommerce and Economic Opportunity
(formerly the Department ofCommerce and Community Affairs) conduct a
study of the economic impact ofthe proposed rules.
The Department may
within 30 to 45 days of such request produce a study ofthe economic impact
ofthe proposed rules.
At a minimum, the economic impact study shall
address a)
economic, environmental, and public health benefits that may be
achieved through compliance with the proposed rules, b) the effects ofthe
proposed rules on employment levels, commercial productivity, the economic
growth ofsmall businesses with
100 or less employees, and the State’s
overall
economy, and c) the cost per unit of pollution reduced and the
variability ofcompany revenues expected to be used to implement the
proposed rules; and
WEB SITE
ww w.ipch.state.ii.
us
(2)
conduct at least one public hearing on the economic impact ofthose
rules.
At least 20 days before the hearing, the Board shall notify the public of
the hearing and make the economic impact study, or the Department of
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
December 9, 2004
Commerce and Economic Opportunity’s explanation for not producing an
economic impact study, available to the public.
Such public hearingmay be
held simultaneously or as a part ofany Board hearing considering such new
rules.”
415
ILCS
5/27(b)
(2002).
The Board is scheduling hearing dates for this rulemaking proposal.
I would
greatly appreciate
a response from
you concerning DCEO’s position on whether it
will perform the economic impact study.
The Board appreciates DCEO’s recent timely and considered response to
similar requests we have made concerning other pending rulemakings.
The Board
appreciates that fiscal constraints may prevent DCEO from conducting economic
studies in every rulemaking.
But, as I have pointed out before, a review ofBoard
rulemaking opinions and orders since then would reveal that the Department’s
decision not to perform economic impact studies has not been questioned at any
Board hearing.
IfI, or my staff, can provide you with any
additional infonnation, please let
me know.
While the Board
can proceed to
hold hearings while awaiting your
decision, the Environmental Protection Act does not allow the Board to complete its
rulemaking process without your Department’s~input.
Thank
you for your early response.
Cc:
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Erin Conley, Rules Coordinator
Pollution Control Board