1. LINE NUMBERED VERSION
  2. Due to the volume of this pleading,
  3. please contact the Clerk’s Office
  4. 312/814—3629

REci~r~
w
CLERK’S OFF~C~E
OCT
2 ~2004
STATE OF lLLh’~S
Pollution
Contro’ board
•~1
LINE NUMBERED VERSION
-
.C
L1~~
_.___1__~_
I
-I.
This version should be identical to the submission made by the agency,
with the exceptions that errors in
Source or Authority Notes may have
been
corrected;
the
format
used
is
that
of
the
electronic
Illinois
Administrative
Code
database,
so
formatting
discrepancies
will
be
corrected;
incorrect
depictions
of
existing
language
may
have
been
corrected
to
conform
with
the
JAPA;
statutory
citations
will
be
handled correctly;
any
obvious misspellings revealed
by an electronic
spell
check may have been corrected;
and simple techtiical corrections
may have been made.
If any
such changes have been made, they will
be
highlighted on
the
attached
copy.
If there
is
any problem, contact
JCAR.
On this mark-up, any word or punctuation that has been altered will be
highlighted.
You will need to compare this
to your hard copy or your
database
to
determine how the
original
text
read. If a white
space
is
highlighted, you will know that text has been omitted at that location.
As
always,
if you
would
like
an
adopted
rulemaking
or
any
Illinois
Administrative
Code database materials on
disk or through e-mail for
purposes ofupload, contact Terra Lamb at 785-2254.

ILLINOIS REGISTER
04
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
1)
Heading ofthe Part:
Primary Drinking Water Standards
2)
Code citation:
35
Iii.
Adrn. Code 611
3)
Section numbers:
Proposed Action:
611.102,611.231,611.233
Amend
611.241, 611.242, 611.250
Amend
611.261, 611.262, 611.301
Amend
611.382, 611.383, 611.526
Amend
611.532, 611.533, 611.720
Amend
611.732, 611.953, 611.956
Amend
611 .Appendix
G, 611.AppendixH
Amend
4)
Statutory authority:
415
ILCS
5/7.2,
17,
17.5,
and 27
5)
A complete description ofthe subjects and issues involved:
This docket includes federal SDWA amendments that USEPA adopted in the period
January 1, 2004 though June 30, 2004, and on August
25,
2004.
The amendments
approve one new analytical method for analysis of total coliforms and
E.
coli
and three
newmethods for analysis ofuranium in drinking water.
Another amendment makes a
number ofminor corrections to
various federal rules, including the Long Term
1
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, the Surface Water Treatment Rule, and the
Lead and
Copper Rule.
A fuller discussion of the issues involved in this rulemaking appears in the October 7,
2004 opinion and order in docket R05-6.
The following briefly summarizes the federal
actions considered in this rulemaking.
USEPA amended the federal SDWA regulations three times during the period January 1,
2004 though June 30, 2004.
These actions are summarized below:
February 13, 2004 (69 Fed. Reg.
7156)
USEPA approved an additional
analytical method for colifonns and
E. coli
in drinking water.
June
2, 2004
(69 Fed. Reg. ~1068)
By a direct final rule, USEPA approved three additional analytical
methods for uranium in drinking water.
(This rule was withdrawn on

ILLINOIS REGISTER
2
04
POLLUTION CONTROLBOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
August 25, 2004, as described below.)
June 29,
2004 (69 Fed. Reg.
38850)
USEPA adopted anumber of
minor corrections to various rules, including
the Long Term
1
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, the Surface
Water Treatment Rule, and the Lead and Copper Rule.
The Board engages in ongoing monitoring of federal actions.
As ofthe October 7, 2004
opinion and order, the Board had identified two simultaneous and related USEPA actions
since June 30, 2004, that
further amend the SDWA rules.
Both actions relate directly to
the subject matter ofthe June 2, 2004
amendments that are involved in this docket.
Those two actions are described as follows:
August 25, 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 52176)
By a final rule, USEPA approved the three additional analytical methods
for uranium in drinking waterthat it had approved on June 2, 2004, by a
direct final rule.
(Note the June 2, 2004 notice ofproposed rule at
69
Fed.
Reg. 31068.)
August 25, 2004
(69 Fed. Reg. 52181)
In response to adverse public comments, USEPA withdrew its June 2,
2004 direct final rule that approved three additional analytical methods for
uranium in drinking water.
Tables appear in the Board’s opinion and order ofOctober 7, 2004, in docket R05-6 that
list numerous corrections and amendments that are not based on current federal
amendments.
The tables contain deviations from the literal text of the federal
amendments underlying these amendments, as well as corrections and
clarifications that
the Board made in the base text involved.
Persons interested in the details ofthose
corrections and amendments should refer to the October 7, 2004, opinion and order in
docket R05-6.
Section
17.5 ofthe Environmental Protection Act 415
ILCS
5/17.5
provides that
Section 5-35 ofthe Administrative Procedure Act
5
ILCS
100/5-35
does not applyto
this rulemaking.
Because this rulemaking is not subject to
Section
5-35
of the APA, it is
not subject to First Notice or to Second Notice review by the Joint Committee on
Administrative Rules (JCAR).
6)
Will these proposed amendments replace any emergency amendments currently in effect?

ILLiNOIS REGISTER
4
04
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
from the Board’s Website at http:\\www.ipcb.state.il.us.
12)
Initial regulatory flexibility analysis:
A)
Types ofsmall businesses,
small municipalities, and not-for-profit corporations
affected:
This rulemaking may affect those small businesses, small
municipalities, and not-for-profit corporations that own or operate
a public water
supply.
These proposed amendments do not create or enlarge a state mandate, as
defined in Section 3(b) ofthe State Mandates Act~,
30
ILCS
805/3(b) (2002).
B)
Reporting, bookkeeping or other procedures required for compliance:
The
existing rules and proposed amendments require extensive reporting~
bookkeeping
and other procedures, including the preparation ofreports,
water analyses, and
maintenance ofoperating records.
These proposed amendments do not create or
enlarge a state mandate, as defined in Section 3(b) ofthe State Mandates Act~
30
ILCS
805/3(b) (2002).
C)
Types ofprofessional skills necessary for compliance:
Compliance with the
existing rules and proposed amendments may require the services ofan attorney,
certified public accountant, chemist, and registered professional engineer.
These
proposed amendments do not create or enlarge a state mandate, as defined in
Section 3(b) ofthe State Mandates Act430 ILCS 805/3(b) (2002).
13)
Regulatory agenda on which this rulemaking was summarized:~Ju1y
2004
The full text ofthe Proposed Amendments be~nson the next page:

Back to top


Due
to
the
volume
of this
pleading,

Back to top


please
contact
the
Clerk’s
Office
at

Back to top


312/814—3629
to
view
this
file

Back to top