v~

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

Respondent.

To:

Dorothy Gunn, Clerk

Illinois Pollution

Control

Board

100 West

Randolph

Suite 11-500

Chicago, Illinois

60601

Harvey M.

Sheldon

Hinshaw &

Culbertson

222

North LaSalle

Street

Chicago,

IL 60601

Brad

Halloran,

Hearing

Officer

Illinois

Pollution Control Board

100 West Randolph

Suite

11-500

Chicago,

Illinois 60601

Please take notice

that

I

have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of the

Pollution

Control Board

an original

(1) and nine (9) copies of a Motion

to

Dismiss, a copy

of which is herewith served

upon the attorney for the Petitioner,

Rock Road Companies,

Inc.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: October 18, 2004

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

1021

North

Grand Avenue East

P.O.

Box 19276

Springfield,

IL 62794-9276

217/782-5544

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

4~j~

~ct4~

Sally

~rter

Assistant Counsel

Special Assistant Attorney General’

Division of Legal Counsel

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL

ROCK ROAD

PCB

No. 2005-54

(Permit Appeal- Air)

REc-E~VED

CLERK’S OFFICE

Ocr

2 02004

STATE OF ILLINOIS

Pollution Control Board

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NOTICE

‘U

---

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION

CONTROL BOARD

E

OCT2ü2004

ROCK ROAD COMPANIES,

INC.

)

OF ILLINO,5

Petitioner,

)

Ion Control Board

)

vs.

)

NO. 05-54

)

PERMIT APPEAL

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

)

)

Respondent.

MOTION TO DISMISS

NOW COMES the Respondent,

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,

(“Illinois EPA” or “Agency”),

by one of

its attorneys, Sally Carter, Assistant Counsel and

Special Assistant Attorney General, and,

pursuant to Sections

101 .506 and

105.108 of

the Illinois

Pollution Control Board’s (“Board”) procedural

rules, 35

III. Adm.

Code

101.506 and

105.108, hereby respectfully moves to dismiss Rock Road

Companies, Inc~

(“Rock Road”) Petition for Review of Permit Conditions,

received by the Illinois

EPA on

September 20, 2004.

In support of this

Motion, the Illinois

EPA states as follows:

INTRODUCTION

Rock Road’s

Petition for Review of Permit Conditions (“Petition”) seeks to review

a number of conditions delineated in

a revised permit that were finalized

in an earlier

permit.

The only dissimilarity between the initial permit and the revised permit is a single

revision

made at the Petitioner’s behest concerning the time period allowed for waste oil-

firing

stack testing.

Notably, Rock Road does not request that the Board review this

condition.

,

The initiation of the Petitioner’s lawsuit cannot recast these simple facts.

T.he

Illinois

EPA reviewed and

revised

its final permitting decision,

Construction Permit Grant

-

Operating Permit Denial

-

NSPS,

dated issued June 22, 2004,

(“Original Permit” or

“June 22~Permit”), in

response to a

narrowly-defined request for revision by Rock

Road.

In an

age when complaints about non-responsive administrative agencies are far

1

---

too common,

Rock Road

has filed a

novel lawsuit.

Rock Road’s

Petition disregarded

the existence of the Original Permit and

the

Illinois

EPA’s complete review and

response

to

Rock

Road’s request to

revise the time period allowed for stack

testing from seven

consecutive days to

seven days, total.

Instead, Rock

Road asserted that the Illinois

EPA’s final decision is embraced within the subsequently-issued document,

Construction

Permit Grant

-

Operating Permit Denial

-

NSP Source

-

Revised, date issued August 5,

2004 (“Revised

Permit” or “August

5th

Permit”); that the Petition

is filed within thirty-five

calendar days

of the

Illinois EPA’s issuance

of the Revised Permit;

that grounds exist to

appeal a variety of permit conditions;

and that the Agency failed to accede to Rock

Road’s request to

reopen the permit’s record.

The allegations

are merit-less because

the Board

lacks jurisdiction to hear Rock Road’s claims.’

Based on the facts advanced

in

Rock Road’s

Petition

including

attached

exhibits

and the accompanying affidavit of Illinois

EPA, permitting analyst,

James

Kallmeyer,

it is

clear that Condition 5c was the only term

finalized in the Revised

Permit.

All

other

conditions

were finalized

in

the Original

Permit. While the Illinois

EPA is required

by

regulation to issue public notice of a pending permit transaction ~invoIving

major new

sources and

major modifications,

Rock Road’s request to burn

reclaimed

oil did

not

constitute a major modification.

The Illinois

EPA, having received no request(s) for a

public notice and

comment period

prior to the Agency’s issuance of the Original

Permit,

issued the permit on June 22, 2004.

Rock Road did

not submit a hearing

request during

the thirty-five day appeal period, or any time thereafter.

Instead,

Rock Road submitted

a

closely-drafted request for revision of Condition 5c concerning the time period

allowed

for stack testing from

one calendar week to a total of seven nonconsecutive calendar

days.

The Illinois EPA received

the revision request on June 29, 2004.

On August 5,

2004, the Illinois

EPA acted on the request and issued

the Revised Permit that

included

a

revised Condition 5c limiting stack testing to a total of seven days that need not

2

---

necessarily

be consecutive.

After the Illinois EPA revised the permit, Rock Road filed

the instant Petition on

September 16, 2004, that did

not seek an appeal of Condition 5c

but sought an appeal of Conditions 4,

7b, 9a, 10,

13 and

14.

Under these facts, it

is

clear that the Petition

does not seek an

appropriate review of revised Condition 5c,

but

inappropriately seeks to

review those conditions first designated

in the Agency’s June

22’~

Permit.

BOARD HAS NO JURISDICTION

OVER THIS APPEAL

A.

Rock

Road Cannot Open the

Illinois

EPA’s June 22, 2004, Original Permit

Decision Through the Instant Permit Appeal.

In

Reichhold Chemicals,

the Third

District Appellate Court found

that an

administrative agency lacks inherent authority to amend or change its decisions and

may

only reconsider its decisions where authorized

by statute.

Reichhold Chemicals

v.

Illinois Pollution Control Board,

204

III.

App. 3d 674, 677,

561

N.E. 2d

1343,

1345,

149

III.

Dec. 647,

649.

The Third

District continued

by stating that while the Board has

authority to

modify its decisions, “no such authority to modify or reconsider its decisions

has

been granted by statute

to the Agency, and

no such’ procedures

have been provided

by rule.”

Id.

In this instance,

Section 39(a)

of the Act and 35

III.

Adm. Code 201.167(a),

provide the Illinois

EPA authority

to revise a permit upon reapplication

by the permittee.

See,

Home

Oil Company v.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,

PCB 4-172 (May

6, 2004),

citing,

Reichhold Chemicals,

Inc.

v. PCB,

204

III. App.

3d 674,

561

N.E.2d

1333,

1346

(3rd

Dist.),

appeal denied,

136

III. 2d 554, 567 N.E.

2d 341

(1991).

In

accordance with this statutory authority, the

Illinois

EPA revised Condition 5c based

upon the permittee’s July 29, 2004,

narrowly-defined revision

request.

The Illinois EPA

made

no other revisions to the August

5th

Permit.

While the Illinois

EPA’s June 22~

Permit embodied the Agency’s final decision,

the Revised Permit simply reflected the scope of Rock Road’s request for revision.

3

---

Simply stated, the scope of the Agency’s permit revision to Condition 5c was defined by

the scope of Petitioner’s request for revision, a

call to modify the time period allowed for

stack testing.

See,

attached affidavit of James Kallmeyer detailing the requested

revision.

See also,

the June 22, 2004, and the August

5, 2004,

permitting decisions,

and

the June 29, 2004,

request for revision attached as exhibits.

All attached documents are

incorporated by reference herein.

In

fact, the Revised Permit identifies this revision on

page 8, stating

that “this permit has

been revised to change Condition 5c to

limit waste

oil-firing

to

a total of seven days, which need not necessarily be consecutive, at the

request of the applicant.”

Rock

Road

now seeks to open a number of the conditions

finalized

in the Illinois EPA’s Original

Permit through an

appeal of the

Revised Permit.

Rock Road’s efforts to

access the initial

permit based

on the subsequently revised

permit cannot evade the clear fact that the Agency’s final

decision was on June

22,

2004.

Accordingly, the instant appeal is not proper and should

be dismissed.

In the same manner, the Board

lacks jurisdiction to

review those

conditions

in

the Revised Permit that were finalized

in the Original Permit,

including Conditions 4,

7b,

9a,

10,

13 and 14.

Any review of these conditions would advocate an outcome that

is

tantamount to a reconsideration

of the original permitting

decision.

Reichhold

Chemicals,

Inc.

v.

PCB,

204

Ill.

App. 3d

674, 677-678,

561

N.E.2d

1333, 1345-1346

(3rd

Dist.),

appeal denied,

136

Ill.

2d 554,

567 N.E. 2d

341

(1991).

Condition 5c is the clear

exception due to the Petitioner’s revision request.

However, no such review of Condition

5c has been

identified in the instant proceeding.

To illustrate this point, the Board should consider a slight variation on the instant

scenario.

Assuming again, that the Petitioner requested a revision to the time period’

allowed for stack

testing from seven consecutive days to seven days, total, but that the

Illinois

EPA now takes advantage of the request to revise a number of different

conditions.

Consistent with

Reichhold,

the

Board would find

that any

such action by the

4

---

Illinois EPA would be beyond

its

authority. The outcome should inevitably be

the same

where the Petitioner seeks to take advantage of a revision request to

access different

conditions finalized

in

the Original

Permit.

Affording

Rock Road review of Conditions 4,

7b, 9a,

10,

13

and

14 would

provide

a disincentive to those applicants that invest time

and effort

in assuring the timely appeal

of contested permit conditions.

If the appeal

period

could be extended by a narrowly

drafted revision

request, the applicant could effectively evade the thirty-five day appeal

period

for any permit condition.

Future applicants

could tactfully employ these “revision

req uests” to attain an extension of time to file. an appeal rather than

examining the permit

closely within the prescribed time to ensure the permit was properly issued.

As

such,

any denial of the Agency’s Motion would empower future applicants to circumvent the

Board’s procedural rules.

This

is an outcome

that the Board simply cannot

countenance.

The Board has found

that it does

not possess jurisdiction when similar policy

concerns were articulated

in

Leaking

Underground Storage Tank (“LUST”) appeals.

For

instance,

the Board

held that if the appeal period could

be extended

by the applicant’s

mere resubmittal

of the same application to the Illinois EPA, the applicant could

effectively circumvent the statutory time period.

In

Keen

Oil

v.

IEPA

(May 1,

1997),PCB

97-146, the petitioner submitted a reimbursement application to the LUST Fund.

The

application was denied and

Kean

Oil failed to file an

appeal during

the thirty-five day

period

following the Agency’s decision.

Kean Oil later resubmitted the application, and

again, the Illinois EPA denied

it.

Kean

Oil subsequently filed an appeal

before the

Board.

The Agency

argued that “‘the

Illinois EPA may not alter or reconsider its final’

determination regarding applications for payment from the

UST-Fund

nor may it re-

confer jurisdiction upon the Board or the Appellate Courts where no

petition for review of

an

appealable final

determination was filed

by simply issuing a subsequent

5

---

determination with the same findings.”

Id.,

slip op.

at 6 (quoting

the

Illinois EPA’s Motion

to Dismiss

at p.

10).

The Board agreed

and found that to “allow Kean Oil to

resubmit an

application that the Agency had

made a final determination would

allow applicants who

do not appeal within the statutory appeal

period to circumvent the established statutory

time period

for appeal.”

Id.,

slip op.

at 7.

In

another LUST appeal,

Mick’s Garage

v. Illinois Environmental Protection

Agency,

PCB 03-126, (December 18,

2003), the petitioner sought review of the Illinois

EPA’s January 2003,

decision stating

that a $50,000 deductible applied to a reported

UST-release.

The parties agreed

that this was

a second

reporting of an initial June

1991, release that the Illinois

EPA previously determined a $50,000 deductible applied.

At that time,

the petitioner did

not appeal the decision.

Ten years later and based upon

the Illinois

EPA’s original decision, the Illinois EPA issued

a second final decision

indicating that the applicable

deductible remained $50,000.

The

Board found that it did

not possess jurisdiction to

review the Illinois

EPA’s initial deductibility determination.

While the Board found that it had jurisdiction to

review the Illinois

EPA’s January 2003,

decision,

the Board discerned that the petitioner was, in fact, seeking review of the

Illinois

EPA’s initial deductibility determination.

The Board held that it lacked jurisdiction

to conduct such a review the Illinois EPA’s initial

determination.

Nor does Section

201.168 of the Board’s Air Pollution

Regulations,

35

III. Adm.

Code 201.168, provide the Petitionerwith the authority

to file an

untimely appeal of the

June

22nd

Permit.

Section 201.168 provides

the applicant the right to

appeal any

Agency-imposed permit condition to the Board

pursuant to Section 40

of the Act.

Section 40(a)(1) requires that an appeal of the final permitting decision

be made within

thirty-five days after its service date.

As discussed above and with the exception of

Condition Sc, the Petition was filed well in

excess of thirty-five days after the Petitioner’s

receipt of the June 22’~

Permit.

6

---

B.

The Instant Permit Appeal

is Untimely as Rock Road

EPA’s June 22, 2004, Original Permit Decision

The Board

must

dismiss the pending

Petition on the

basis that it possesses no

jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

As set forth above, the lack of jurisdiction is based upon

the inability of the Petitioner to access the June

22nd

Permit at this late date; accordingly,

the Petitioner failed to file a sufficient and adequate Petition for review within the time

allowed by Section 40(a)(1) of the Act and

35 Ill. Adm. Code 105.206(a).

See also,

35

Ill.

Adm. Code

105.108(b).

A

review of the Board’s procedural rules

regarding the timely filing of petitions

makes clear that the present appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Section

101.300(b) of the Board’s procedural

rules,

35

III. Adm. Code 101.300(b),

provides that

documents will be

considered filed when they are filed

in conformance with the

requirements found

in

Section

101.302 of the procedural rules,

35

III. Adm.

Code

101.302, and

any other filing requirements specifically set out in other parts of the

procedural

rules.

Section 40(a)(1) and 35

III. Adm.

Code 105.206(a) state that any

appeal of the Illinois

EPA’s final permitting decision must be made within thirty-five days

after the date of service of the Agency’s final decision.

The Petitioner failed

to commence this action within the appropriate time frame

as dictated

by the Act and

procedural rules.

Consequently,

Rock Road

has forfeited any

right it had

to seek a review of the permit conditions previously finalized

by the Agency.

The Original

Permit became final on June 22, 2004, and was

mailed to

the Petitioner on

that date or the next business day.

If the Petitionerwished to

contest the permit as

prescribed

by Section 40(a)(1) and 35

Ill. Adm.

Code 105.206, an

appeal should

have

been made within thirty-five days of receiptor on or about August 2,

2004,

(This

calculation assumes that service of the Original Permit to the Petitioner was on June 28,

2004.

See,

Supreme Court Rule

12 (Service by mail is deemed

complete four days after

7

---

mailing

for purposes of circuit court pleadings.))

However, no such appeal

was timely

filed.

Instead,

the Petitioner filed the September

16th

Petition of the Illinois

EPA’s August

5th

Permit.

This Petition did

not comply with

the Board’s procedural rules,

in

that it

specifically sought to appeal permit conditions finalized

months earlier on June 22, 2004.

On top of this,

the Petition failed to address Condition

5c, the sole revision requested

and

made to the Revised Permit.

The Board cannot accept the Petition as being

in

conformance with

its

procedural rules, since it violated 35

Ill. Adm.

Code 105.206(a).

The Board must dismiss the

appeal because the September

16th

date

is well beyond the

deadline for filing an appeal

here, and for that reason,

the Board

lacks jurisdiction to

hear this appeal.

If the

Board

allows the appeal to proceed, it has granted itself relief

from the requirements

and

prohibitions set forth

in Section 40(a)(1) and 35

III.

Adm.

Code 105.208 of the Board’s rules;

such deviation

from statutory and regulatory

standards is simply not permissible.

The Agency’s position

is entirely consistent

with Board

precedent.

As

the Board

has

noted

on

many

occasions, an

appeal

that

is not timely filed

cannot

be

heard since

the Board

lacks

jurisdiction to do so.

Solid Waste Agency of Northern

Cook

County

V.

City of Des

Plaines,

PCB

03-210

(June

5,

2003);

Dewey’s

Seivice,

Inc.

v.

Illinois EPA,

PCB

99-107

(February

4,

1999)

(Finding

appeal

untimely when

mailed

only

one

day

after the

running of the

thirty-five day

appeal

period).

Consistent therewith,

the Board

has

held that it operates

only under special

statutory jurisdiction and

thus,

it is limited by

the language conferring that jurisdiction in the Act.

Cathy Bevis,

et.

aI.

v.

Wayne County

Board,

(May

18,

1995),

PCB

95-128.

In

Bevis,

the

Fifth

District Appellate Court

upheld

the

Board’s decision,

finding that the Act did

not provide the Board discretion to waive or

otherwise

modify the

requirement that an

applicant

must

be

named as

a

respondent to

an

appeal

from

the

county

board’s

local

sitting

approval

decision.

The

Fifth

District

further

clarified,

stating,

“the

petitioner

must

comply

with

the

agency-review statutory

8

---

requirements

in

order for the PCB to

have

authority to

hear the case.”

Cathy Bevis,

et.

al.

v.

Illinois Pollution Control Board,

289

Ill.

App. 3d 432, 681

N.E. 2d

1096, 224

III.

Dec.

475.

In the same

token, the Act and the procedural rules do not provide the Board with

discretion

to

modify

the requirement

that

a

Petition

must

be

filed within

thirty-five

days

after

the date

of service.

35

III.

Adm.

Code

105.208

provides

the

sole

mechanism

to

extend the thirty-five day filing requirement; the applicant and

the Agency must file a joint

request for

an

extension

of time within

thirty-five days

of the date

of service.

No

such

joint

request

has

been

filed.

Nor will

a request

be

forthcoming

at this

late

date.

The

parties are required

to request an

extension within the initial thirty-five day appeal

period.

Home

Oil Company

v.

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Agency,

PCB

4-172

(May

6,

2004).

Consequently,

the Board

does

not

possess jurisdiction

to

consider the

instant

Petition.

9

---

CONCLUSION

The Illinois

EPA respectfully requests that the

Board

dismiss the present

appeal.

The failure of the Petitioner to timely petition the Board for review of the June 22~

Permit

renders

the

September

16th

filing

a

nullity.

The

only

exception

to

this concerns

any

review

of

revised

Condition

5c,

however,

no

such

review

has

been

sought

by

the

Petitioner.

Under these

circumstances, there

is no

basis for the instant appeal to stand;

the requirement of a timely filed

appeal

is jurisdictional and

mandatory.

Accordingly,

the

Illinois

EPA

respectfully

requests

that

the

instant

petition

be

dismissed

due

to

the

Board’s lack of jurisdiction.

Respectfully submitted,

ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

Respondent

/1~L~q~

~tU

Sally C~9ter

Assistant Counsel

Special Assistant Attorney General

Division of Legal

Counsel

1021

North

Grand Avenue,

East

P.O.

Box19276

Springfield,

Illinois 62794-9276

217/782-5544

Dated:

October 18,

2004

10

---

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION

CONTROL BOARD

ROCK

ROAD COMPANIES,

INC.

,

)

)

Petitioner,

)

vs.

)

NO.05-54

)

PERMIT APPEAL

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

)

)

Respondent.

AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES

KALLMEYER

Upon penalties as provided

by law pursuant to

Section

1-109 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, the undersigned

certifies

that the statements set forth

in

this instrument are

true and correct,

except as to

matters therein stated to be on

information and

belief and

as to such

matters the undersigned

certifies as aforesaid

that

I verily believe’the same to

be true.

1.

I,

JAMES

KALLMEYER,

am

employed

by

the

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Agency

(“Illinois

EPA”),

as

a

permit

analyst

in

the

Permit

Section

for

the

Bureau of Air.

I

have been employed

by the

Illinois

EPA since

1998.

2.

As

part of my duties in

the Bureau of Air,

I

am responsible for responding

to requests

for permit application assistance and reviewing permit applications submitted

by the regulated

community for the construction,

installation,

or operation

of any

type

of

facility or equipment.

I

also

respond

to

written

and

verbal inquiries concerning

permit

applications.

If notice

and

an

opportunity for a

public hearing

are

required

by State

or

federal

law

or

regulation,

I

review

any

and

all

public

comments

prior

to

making

a

permitting

decision.

Upon proof

by the applicant that

the facility or equipment

will

not

cause

a

violation

of the

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Act

(“Act”)

or the associated

regulations,

I

draft

the

appropriate

permit,

including

any

necessary

conditions

to

accomplish

the

purposes of the Act, for

issuance to the applicant.

In

the event that the

permit

is denied,

I

draft the

necessary denial letter,

detailing the reasons that the permit

1

---

application

was

denied.

As

needed,

I

provide

comments

and

recommendations

on

various proposed

Bureau of Air documents and actions.

In addition,

I perform

evaluation

of

construction fee

submittals

and

perform

other

general

duties,

all

in

support of

basic

permit writing responsibilities.

3.

I

hold

a

Bachelors of

Science

in

Electrical

Engineering

degree from

the

University

of

Missouri

at

Rolla.

In

addition,

I

have

taken

a

variety

of

courses

at

Lincolnland

Community

College including,

but

not limited

to,

Electronic Circuit Theory,

Numerical

Analysis,

and

C Language

Programming.

My qualifications

also

include

the

following:

I

have

personally been

involved

in

reviewing

over 800

permit

applications

of

various types.

Prior to

becoming

a

permit

analyst for the

Bureau

of Air,

I

served

as

a

Environmental

Protection

Engineer

I

in

the

Compliance

Section

for

approximately

six

ft

months.

Before

employment

with

the

Illinois

EPA,

I

held

engineering

positions

in

electronic design and manufacturing

in

the industrial sector.

4.

I

am familiar with

the Rock

Road Companies,

Inc.

(“Rock

Road”) Petition

for

Review

of

Permit

Conditions

(“Petition”), the circumstances

surrounding

the

Illinois

EPA’s

review

of

Rock

Road’s

permit

application,

the

permits

issued

and

the

permit

revision

request.

In

support

of

the

Illinois

EPA’s

Motion

to

Dismiss,

I

provide

the

following statements based upon my experience and expertise.

5.

On

March

24,

2004,

the

Illinois

EPA

received

a

permit

application

to

construct

emission

source(s)

and/or

air

pollution

control

equipment

consisting

of

a

modification

to

an

existing

drum-mix asphalt plant

with

baghouse

to

allow

the use

of

distillate fuel

oil

No.

2

and

waste

oil

in

the drum

mixer! drum

dryer.

While

the

Illinois

EPA

previously

received odor

and

particulate

matter

complaints

concerning

the facility,

the

Illinois

EPA did

not receive

any

request(s)

for

a public

notice

and

comment

period

prior to the Agency’s issuance of the permit.

2

---

6.

On June 22, 2004, the Illinois EPA issued the Construction Permit Grant

-

Operating

Permit

Denial

-

NSPS

Source

(“Original

Permit”) for

the

Alternate

Firing

of

Petitioner’s Asphalt Plant.

Condition 5c of the Original Permit stated as follows:

Waste oil-firing

of

the drum

mixer/ drum

dryer is allowed under this construction

permit

only for

a

period

not

to

exceed

one

calendar week,

for

the purposes of

preparing

for

and

conducting

compliance

stack

testing.

If

additional

time

is

required,

the

Illinois

EPA,

Compliance

Section

and

Field

Operations

Section

must first be

contacted to obtain approval.

Records shall be kept of the calendar

dates

and

number of

hours each

day the plant is fired

with waste oil

until

testing

is completed.

If evidence arises of odor problems,

operation with waste oil-firing

must be

stopped immediately.

(Emphasis

added).

In

the

normal

course

of

business, the

Illinois

EPA,

Bureau

of Air,

mails

permits

via

United

States

mail

to

the

applicant

on

the

date

of

issuance

or the

following business day.

The Original Permit is attached

as Exhibit A and incorporated

by

reference herein.

7.

On July 21, 2004,

I

received a phone call from Steve Kennedy, Vice

President of Rock

Road, concerning waste oil-fired, stack testing for its Rockford asphalt

plant.

During the conversation, Mr.

Kennedy requested

that the facility be allowed to

revise the time period

for stack

testing employing waste

oil-firing from one calendar

week

to

a total of seven

nonconsecutive calendar days due to weather concerns.

No

other permit conditions were discussed during the July 21, 2004,

conversation.

In an,

electronic message of the same date to

Ms.

Julie Armitage, Acting

Manager,

Compliance and

Systems Management System,

I detailed the substance of this

conversation.

The July 21, 2004,

email is attached as Exhibit

B and

incorporated by

reference herein.

8.

In

correspondence

dated,

July

23,

2004,

Mr.

Kennedy

made

the

same

revision

request

detailed

in

paragraph

7

above

to

Ms.

Armitage.

The

Illinois

EPA

received

the

July

23,

2004,

revision

request

on

July

29,

2004.

No

other

permitS

3

---

conditions were discussed in the correspondence dated, July 23, 2004. This document is

attached as Exhibit C and

incorporated by reference herein.

9.

In

response to the revision

request received

on

July 29, 2004, the Illinois

EPA

revised

the

Original

Permit;

the

revision

is

reflected

in

Condition

5c

of

the

Construction

Permit

Grant

-

Operating

Permit

Denial

-

NSPS

Source

-

Revised,

(“Revised

Permit”),

issued

on

August

5,

2004.

Condition

5c

of

the

Revised

Permit

stated as follows:

Waste oil-firing

of the drum mixer! drum dryer is allowed under this construction

permit

only for a

period not to exceed

a

total of seven

days,

for the

purposes

of

preparing for and conducting

compliance stack testing.

These are not required to

be

seven

consecutive

calendar days.

If additional

time

is

required,

the

Illinois

EPA,

Compliance

Section

and

Field

Operations

Section

must

first be

contacted

to

obtain

approval.

Records shall

be

kept of

the calendar dates

and

number of

hours

each

day

the

plant

is fired

with

waste

oil

until

testing

is completed.

If

evidence

arises of odor problems, operation with waste

oil-firing must

be

stoppedk

immediately.

(Emphasis added).

In addition, the revision

is further detailed

on

page 8 of the Revised

Permit,

stating

that,

“ut

should

be

noted

that

this

permit

has

been

revised

to

change

Condition

Sc to limit waste

oil-firing

to

a total of seven days, which

need not necessarily

be

consecutive,

-

at

the

request of

the

applicant.”

The

Revised

Permit

is

attached

as’

Exhibit D and incorporated by reference herein.

10.

In

addition,

I

have

reviewed

the

Illinois

EPA

files

and

determined

‘that

Rock

Road never submitted

a request to

revise

Conditions 4,

7b,

9a,

10,

13,

and

14

of

the Original Permit through the end of August 2004.

‘L

4

---

11.

I

attest

that

the

documents

submitted

with

this

affidavit

are

true

and

correct copies

of

the

Original

Permit,

date

issued,

June

22,

2004,

the July

21,

2004,

electronic

message to

Julie Armitage

detailing

a

phone

conversation

between

myself

and

Steve Kennedy, the

revision request

received

by the

Illinois

EPA on

July 29, 2004,

and the Revised

Permit,

date issued, August 5, 2004.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH

NOT

JAMES

KALLMEYER

Subscribed

and sworn to before me

this

/

9~çJay

of October 2004.

NOTARYPUBLIC

5

“OFFICIAL SEAL”

~

Vicky Vonlanken

Notary Pubiic, State of fl~noia~

My

Commission ~

~ii2I20O8

---

ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION

AGENCY

P.O.

Box

19506,

SPRINGFIELD,

ILLINOIS

62794-9506

RENEE CIPRIANO,

DIRECTOR

217/782-2113

CERTIFIED MAIL

7002

3150

0000

1226

6526

CONSTRUCTION

PERMIT

GRANT

-

OPERATING

PERMIT

DENIAL

-

NSPS SOURCE

PERMITTEE

-

Rock Road Companies,

Inc.

Attn:

Mr.

Steve Kennedy, Vice President

Post Office Box 1779

301 West Townline Road

Janesville, Wisconsin

53547

Application No.:

04030060

I.D. No.:

2O18O8ABG

Applicant’s Designation: BEALECOURT

Date Received: March 24,

2004

Subject: Asphalt Plant Alternate Firing

Date Issued: June 22,

2004

Location:

801 Beale Court, Rockford,

Illinois,

61109

Permit

is hereby granted to the above-designated Permittee to CONSTRUCT

emission source(s)

and/or air pollution control equipment consisting of

the

modification of the existing drum-mix asphalt plant with baghouse to allow

-

the use of

distillate fuel oil

No.

2 and waste oil in the drum mixer/drum

dryer,

as described in the above-referenced application.

This Permit

is

subject to standard conditions attached hereto and the following special

condition(s)

la.

This asphalt plant

is subject

to New Source Performance Standards

(NSPS),

40 CFR 60,

Subparts A and

I.

The Illinois EPA is administering

these standards in Illinois on behalf of the United States EPA under a

delegation agreement.

-

b.

The emissions from the asphalt plant shall not contain particulate

matter

(PM)

in excess

of 0.04 gr/dscf and shall not exhibit 20~opacity

or greater,

pursuant to the NSPS,

40 CFR

60’.92.

-

c.

At all

times the Permittee shall also maintain and operate the asphalt

plant,

including associated air pollution control equipment,

in a

manner consistent with good air pollution control practice for

minimizing emissions,

pursuant to the NSPS,

40 CFR 60.11(d).

2a.

No person shall cause or allow the emission of smoke or other

particulate matter, with an opacity greater than 30 percent,

into the

atmosphere from any emission unit other than those emission units

subject to the requirements of

35

Ill. Adm.

Code 212.122, pursuant to

35

Ill. Adm. Code~212.l23(a), except as allowed by 35

Ill. Adm. Code

2~2.l23(b) and 212.124.

b.

No person shall cause or allow any visible emissions of fugitive

particulate matter from any process,~includingany material handling or

storage activity beyond

the property line of the source except when the

wind speed is in~excessof

25 miles per hour,

pursuant

to’ 35 Ill.

Adm.

Code 212.301 and 212.314.

ROD

R.

BLAGOJEVICH,

GOVERNOR

PRtNTED

o~

RECYCLED

PAPER

---

•

¾

—~

Page

2

3.

No person shall cause or allow the emission of sulfur dioxide ,into the

atmosphere from any process emission unit to exceed 2000 ppm, pursuant.

to

35 Ill.

Adm. Code 214.301.

4.

Use of Organic Material.

Pursuant to 35

Ill. Adm. Code 215.301, no

personal shall cause or allow the discharge of more than 8.0 lbs/hour

of organic material into the atmosphere from any emission unit,

except

if no odor nuisance exists this limitation shall only apply to

-‘

photochemically reactive material as defined in 35

Ill. Adm. Code

211.4690.

5a.

Operation of

the drum mixer/drum dryer associated with the asphalt

plant firing distillate fuel oil No.

2 or waste-oil shall not begin

until all associated air pollution control equipment has been

constructed and is operational.

b.

The Permittee shall furnish the Illinois EPA written notification as

follows pursuant to 40 CFR 60.7(a):

i.

A notification of anticipated date of initial start-up at least

5

days

prior to. such date,

ii.

A notification of actual date of initial start-up within 15 days

after such date.

C.

Waste oil-firing of

the

drum mixer/drum dryer is allowed under this

construction permit only for a period not to exceed one calendar week,

for the purposes of preparing for and conducting compliance stack

testing.

If additional time

is required,

the Illinois EPA, Compliance

Section and Field Operations Section must

first be contacted to obtain

approval.

Records shall be kept of the calendar dates and number

of’,•

hours each day the plant

is fired with waste oil until testing is

completed.

If evidence arIses of odor problems, operation with waste

oil-firing must be stopped immediately.

-

-

6a.

The baghouse shall be in operation at all times when the associated

drum mixer/drum dryer is in operation and emitting air contaminants.

b.

The Permittee shall follow good operating practices for the baghouse.,

including periodic inspection,

routine maintenance and prompt repair of

defects.

..

7a.

At the above location,

the Permittee shall not keep,

store,

or utilize

in the affected drum-mix asphalt plant:

i.

Distillate fuel oil

(Grade No.

1 and

2)

with

a sulfur content

greater than the larger of the following two values:

A.

0.28 weight percent, or

-

---

Page

3

B.

The Wt percent given by the formula:

Maximum Wt percent

sulfur

=

(0.000015) x

(Gross heating value of oil,

Btu/lb).

b.

This permit

is issued based on the combustion waste oil for the drum

mixer/drum dryer.

This use of waste oil

is not allowed to fire the

asphalt tank heaters, boilers,

or any unit that meets the definition of

a fuel combustion emission unit pursuant to 35

Ill.

Adm.

Code 211.2470.

C.

The Illinois EPA shall be allowed to sample all fuels stored at the

above location.

8.

In the event that the.operation of this source r~sultsin an odor

nuisance,

the Permittee shall take appropriate and necessary actions to

minimize odors,

including but not limited to,

changes in raw material

or installation of

controls,

in order to eliminate the nuisance.

9a.

Emissions

and operation of the asphalt plant shall

not exceed the

following limits:

.i.

Asphalt Production Limits:

Asphalt Concrete Production

(Tons/Month)

(Tons/Year)

50,000

-

300,000

ii.

Emissions from Drum

Mixer/Dryer~

Emission Factor

Emissions

Pollutant

(Lb/Ton)

(Tons/Mo)

(Tóns/Yr)

-

0.033

-

0.83

5;0

0.055

1.38

8.3

0.130

3.25

19.5

0.032

-

0.80

4.8

0.058

1.45

8.7

Totals

7.71

46.3

iii.

Emissions from Asphalt Silo Loading and Truck Loadout:

Emission Factor

Emissions

Pollutant

(lb/Ton)

(lb/Mo)

(Ton/Yr)

CO

-

0.0007

35

0.11

PM

0.0007

35

0.11

VOM

,

0.0048

240

0.72

iv.

These limits are based on maximum asphalt production and standard

AP-42 emission factors.

Compliance with annual limits shall be

determined from.a running total

of

12 months of data.

b.

Emissions of hazardous air pollutants

(HAPs)

as listed in Section

112(b)

of the Cl~anAir Act shall be less than

10 tons/year of any

Particulate Matter

(PM)

Nitrogen Oxides

(NOr)

Carbon Monoxide

(CO)

Volatile Organic Material

(VOM)

‘Sulfur Dioxide

(SO2)

---

Page

4

single HAP or

25 tons/year of any combination of such HAPs.

As

a

result of this condition,

this permit

is issued based on the emissions

of all

HAPs

from this source not triggering Section 112(g)

of the Clean

Air Act.

c.

No person shall cause or threaten or allow the discharge or emission of

any contaminant into the environment in any State so as to cause or

tend to cause air pollution in Illinois,

either alone or in combination

with contaminants from other sources,

or so as to violate regulations:’

or standards adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board,

pursuant

to Section

9(a)

of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act.

l0a.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.8(a),

within 60 days after achieving the maximum

production rate at which the asphalt plant will be operated, but not

later than 90 days after initial startup,

the particulate matter

concentration in its effluent stream shall be measured by an approved

independent testing service, using waste-oil firing and during

conditions which are representative

of the maximum performance.

During

these tests,

observations to determine opacity of the effluent stream

shall also be conducted.

b.

This testing shall, be conducted and data collected in accordance with

the test methods and procedures specified in 40 CFR 60.8,

60.11 and

60

.

93.

c.

At least 60 days prior to the actual date of testing,

the Permittee

shall submit a written test plan to the Illinois EPA for review and

approval.

This plan shall include as a minimum:

i.

The name

(or other identification)

of the emission unit(s)

to be

tes~edand the name and address of the facility at which they are

located;

ii.

The name and address

of the independent testing service(s)

performing the tests,

with the names of the individuals who may

be performing sampling and analysis and their experience with

similar tests;

iii.

The specific determinations of emissions and/or performance which

are intended to be made,

including the site(s)

in the ductwork or

stack at which sampling will occur;

iv.

The specific conditions under which testing will be performed,

including

a discussion of why these conditions will be

representative of maximum emissions and minimum control

performance,

the values of operating parameters for the emission

unit,

including associated control equipment,

at or within which

compliance is intended to be shown, and the means by which the

operating parameters will

b,e determined;’

.

d.

i.

The Permittee shall provide the Illinois EPA with written

,

notificati~nof testing at least thirty

(30)

days prior to

---

Page

5

testing to enable the Illinois EPA to have an observer present.

This notification shall include the name of emission unit(s)

to

be tested,

scheduled date and time,

and, contact person with

telephone number.

ii.

If testing is delayed,

the Permittee shall promptly notify the

Illinois EPA by facsimile,

at least

5 days prior to the scheduled

date of testing or immediately,

if the delay occurs in the

5 days

prior to the scheduled date.

This notification shall also

include the new date and time for testing,

if

set, or a separate

notification shall be sent with this information when it

is

set.

e,.

The Permittee shall submit the Test Report for this testing,

accompanied by a cover letter stating whether or not compliance was

shown,

to the Illinois EPA without delay, within 30 days after the

results are compiled,

but no later than sixty

(60)

days after the date

of testing or sampling.

The Test Report shall include

as

a minimum:

i.

General information describing the test,

including the name and

identification of the emission source which was tested, date of

test, names of personnel performing the tests, and Illinois EPA

observers,

if

any;

-.

ii.

A summary of results;

iii’.

Description of test procedures,

including description of sampling

points,

test equipment,

and

test schedule;

iv.

Detailed description of test conditions,

including:

A.

-

Process information,

i.e., process

rate, aggregate type,

fuel type,

and firing rate.

B.

Control equipment information,

i.e.,

equipment condition

and operating parameters during’testing.

v.

Data and calculations,

including copies of all raw data sheets

and records

of laboratory analyses,

sample calculations, and data

on equipment calibration.

lla.

The Permittee shall perform all applicable monitoring for the drum-mix

asphalt plant

as specified in

4,0

CFR

60.13 and 60.674.

b.

Inspections of the drum-mix asphalt plant and control systems equipment

and operations shall be performed as necessary but at least once per week

when the ‘affected drum-mix asphalt plant is in operation to confirm

compliance with the requirements of this permit.

.

l2a.

‘The Permittee shall maintain record~of -the following items for the

drum-mi~casphalt plant to demonstrate compliance with the conditions of

this permit:

---

Page

6

i.

Asphalt concrete production

(tons/month and tons/year);

-

ii.

Waste oil shipments,

usage,

sulfur content,

and ash content

(gallons/month,

gallons/year,

weight,

weight); and

iii.

Dates of operation and hours of operation with waste oil-firing

(calendar

days,

hours/day).

iv.

Records

addressing

use

of

good

operating

practices

for

the

baghouse:

A.

Operating logs for the drum-mix asphalt plant- dryer

baghouse, including operating data

(pressure drop or stack

condition),

daily upon startup;

B.

Records for periodic inspection of

th’e baghouse. with date,

individual performing the

inspection,

and nature of

inspection; and

C.

Records for prompt repair of defects, with identification

and description of defect,

effect on emissions,

date

identif~ied, date repaired,

and nature of repair.

v.

Incidents of malfunction, with date, duration,

description,

probable cause,

and corrective actions, pursuant to 40 CFR

60.7(b),

and

vi.

Monthly and aggregate annual CO.

NOR,

PM,

SO2,

and VOM emissions

from the drum-mix asphalt plant shall be maintained,

based on

asphalt production and the applicable emission factors, with

supporting calculations.

.

-

b.

All records and logs required by this permit shall be retained at

a

readily accessible location at the source for at least three years from

the date of entry and shall be made available for inspection and

copying by the Illinois EPA upon request.

Any

records retained in an

electronic format

(e.g.,

computer)

shall be capable of being retrieved

and printed on paper during normal source office hours so as to be able

to respond to an Illinois EPA request for records during the course of

a source inspection.

l3a.

The Permittee shall promptly notify the Illinois

EPA,

Compliance

Section,

of deviations of the drum-mix asphalt plant with the permit

requirements as follows.

Reports

shall describe the probable cause of

such deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures

taken:

‘

-

i.

Emissions of CO. NO~, PM,

SO2 and/or VOM,

in excess of the

limit specified in Condition

9 within 30 days of a record

showing such an occurrence.

---

Page

7

ii.

Continued operation of the drum-mix asphalt plant with a

defect in

a

baghouse that may result, in emissions

of

particulate matter in excess of limits in Conditions 1(b),

2,

or

4(a) within 30 days of such an occurrence.

iii.

The use of distillate fuel oil with a sulfur content in

excess of the limit specified in Condition 7(a)

with the

length of time this fuel was used and the effect on

emissions of SO2 within 30 days of this violation being

-

detected.

.

b.

The Permittee shall submit

all applicable reports for the drum-mix

asphalt plant as

specified in 40 CFR 60.7 and 60.19.

c.

Two

(2)

copies of required reports and notifications concerning

equipment operation or repairs,

performance testing or a continuous

monitoring system shall be sent

to:

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Division of Air Pollution Control

Compliance Section

(4f40)

P.O. Box l927~6

Springfield,

Illinois

62794-9276

and one

(1)

copy shall be sent to the Illinois EPA’s regional office at

the following address unless otherwise indicated:

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Division of Air Pollution Control

5415 North University

Peoria,

Illinois

61614

,

-

14.

A construction permit covers construction activity taking place on or

after the date

of issuance of the permit.

Even though the issuance of

this permit indicates that the Illinois EPA has found that the

-

application for the subject equipment met

35

Ill. Adm. Code 201.155,

the standards for issuance of a construction permit,

this permit does

not cover and in no way condones or approves any construction of the

subject emission sources or air pollution control ec~iipmentwhich took

place before the date of issuance

of this permit.

The OPERATING permit application is DENIED because the Illinois Environmental

Protection Act,

Section

9, and 35

Ill. Adm. Code 201.160 might be violated.

Pursuant to Section 201.160,

an operating permit’rnay not be issued until the

equipment has been constructed or modified in accordance with applicable,

conditions in this construction permit.

The Illinois EPA suggests that you

reapply for the operating permit after construction and testing

are completed

in accordance with the construction permit.

-

It should be ‘noted that this ‘permit does not authorize the aáceptance of waste.

The appropriate permit tmust be obtained from the Bureau of Land before waste

---

Page 8

can be accepted.

If the used oil is not

“on-spec” and not burned in a unit for

energy recovery as allowed by 35

Ill. Adm.

Code 739.161,

the used oil will be

considered a solid waste and not

a fuel.

This makes the used oil subject to

the manifest requirements of

35 Ill.

Adm.

Code 809 and the facility subject to

the permitting requirements of

35

Ill.

Adm.

Code 807,

as

a solid waste

management

site.

Furthermore, the used oil must provide surplus energy beyond

that necessary to sustain combustion to be considered a fuel and not a waste.

If you have any questions on this permit, please call Jim Kallmeyer

at

217/782-2113.

Donald E. Sutton,

P.E.

Manager,

Permit Section

Division of~ir Pollution Control

DES TDK:~j

COPY

cc:

Illinois

EPA,

FOS

Region

2

Original Signed by

Donald

E.

Sutton,

P.E.

---

CALCULJ~TION

SHEET

Facility:

Rock Road Companies,

Inc.

ID

201808ABG

‘

-

Anal.

Eng.

JDK

Date 6-18-04

PN

04030060

Rev.

Eng.

Date

Date ReC.

3-24-04

This

is an application for a

JOINT

from an asphalt plant facility

located

an

attainment

area

for

all pollutants,

which holds a FESOP

(72110724)

for two asphalt plants

(one n.-gas,

one fuel oil-fired).

VN A-2003-00330 was issued 12-12-03.

The

request

‘is

to

add

alternate

FO*2

and

waste

oil-firing

to

the

plant

currently permitted for natural gas-firing only.

Actual emissions,

using AP-42 waste oil-firing,

emission factors:

PM

=

0.033 VT x 300,000 T/yr x T/2000 #

=

5.0 T/yr

NOX

=

0.055

x

150

=

8.3 T/yr

--

Co=0.l3xlSO=19.ST/yr

VOM= 0.032x150=4.8T/yr

502

=

0.058 x 150

=

8.7 T/yr

Total

=

46.3 T/yr

Fuel

oil

#2/waste

oil

tanks

are

exempt

per

~5

IAC

201.146

(n).

I recommend a CONSTRUCTION GRANT-OPERATE DENY

permit be issued, with

the requirement to stack test using waste oil before incorporating into

the

existing-

FESOP.

Permit

condition

will restrict -waste oil use to one

week maximum to allow for testing only.

‘

NOTES:

1.

Facility was discovered by. FOS

(Tom Walsh)

to be operating with

waste oil without proper permitting.

VN resulted requiring

immediate stop to waste oil-firing. Site is next to a medical

packaging facility which complained of emissions. Numerous

citizen complaints re odors

(see I.D.

file for details)

.

-

2.

CROPA

form and copy of application was sent 6-8-04 to Joyce

Munie,

BOL/LPC.

Copy

of application was sent to Mr.

K.

Gadi,

at his request.

‘

3.

The FESOP (which was opened’ originally with this application)

will be revised to remove the fuel oil-fired plant,

which’

appl,icant claims’has not existed at this site for years.

Further,

FESOP will be revised to add omitted crushing equipment

(1 screen

and

6 conveyo~s) and two natural gas-fired tank heaters.

---

COMPLETENESS

REViEW WORKSHEET

L

•

•

FOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES

-

-

-

FACILITY:

~—

0 ~

(~

?~bC~~

Z~LJ

~

ID

NO.:

Z.c’I

~

.A5~

APPLICATION NO.:

~

O3

OO~’~)

DATE

REGD:

2_3,4,g_4-

ANALYST.-J~.~

IDENTIFICATION

OF

E~W

--

‘~

~

‘

NUMBER (CIRCLE)~ 2

3

4

5

6

7

‘8

-

~

INfl’LA~L

COMPLETENESS

RE~/lEW

0

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITI’AL (DATE):

I

I

-

0

OTHER TRIGGER (DESCRIBE):

——

—~

——

-

-

TYPEOFSOURCE

-

(~,

SYNTHETIC

MINOR

0

MPJOR

HAVE FESOP?

~

YES

0

NO

o

INCOMPLETE (DESCRIBE):

‘

.

~

‘APPLICATION

COMPLETE

.

‘

‘ACTIONTO BET~EN

.

.

~‘

o

CALL

0

REQUEST ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION

0

REJECT

‘1-”

0

DENY

,

ACTION COMPLETED:

I

I

DAr:

.

.

-

o

INADEQUATE

0

UNCERTAIN

.

.

CORRECT

0

OVERPAID (DESCRIBE):

.

ACTION TO BE TAKEN

o

CONTINUE WITH TECHNICAL

REViEW

o

REQUEST TECHNICAL INFO (SEE

ABOVE)

o

REQUEST TECHNICAL INFO & UPDATED

FEE INFO (SEE

ABOVE)

o

BILL & CONTINUE

WITH

TECHNICAL REViEW

o

BILL & NO

TECHNICAL REVIEW

(EXPLAIN):

BILL AMOUNT

REASON

AMOUNT

I.

$

2.

3.~

-

TOTAL~

$

BILL DATE:

I

I

-

~DAr:

ANALYST:

‘~J7)

~

DATE:

~Q~i23,C~

COMMENTS:

‘~Z-

(~Z~

A&-O

~

( F’i

I

&M

~

1QC.

C

REVIEW:

~

DATE:

~IV3IV.!!1

COMMENTS:

Aj

r~e 31)

(~‘~

‘:

—

NOTES:

~

~

1~

‘-~

‘-~

~-

~‘~‘~-

‘

f/g-~,J6-

c.~TW

/&U~_7~PI~E

fc~i~s

Ic

To

E.4.JA5L

P11~TA?~’

~—‘

1 of 2

---

CIRCLE THE START DATE

SQUARE THE STOP DATE

DATE FINAL ACTION

MUST BE TAKEN

BY:

(tobe completed

after oavmentreceived~

INITIAL START DATE

DAYS ALLOWED 90/180

6

7

8

9

10

START__________

STOP__________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING_________

START__________

DOWN PERIOD_________

16

17

18

19

20

STOP__________

DAYS REMAINING_________

26

27

28

29

30

START__________

STOP____________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS

REMAINING

36

37

38

39

40

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING__________

46

47

48

49

50

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS

REMAINING__________

56

57

58

59

60

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS

REMAINING__________

66

67

68

69

70

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING__________

76

77

78

79

80

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING__________

86

•

87

88

89

90

START_________

STOP___________

-

DOWN

PERIOD

DAYS

REMAINING__________

‘

96

97

98

99

100

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS

REMAINING__________

106

107

108

109

.110

STOP

START__________

,

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING

,

•

116

117

118

119

120

STOP_-

START__________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING__________

126

127

128

129

130

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING

136

137

138

139

140

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING

START__‘

DOWN PERIOD_________

146

147’

148

149

150

STOP__________

DAYS REMAINING

156

157.

158

159

160

START__________

STOP___________

DOWN PERIOD_________

DAYS REMAINING__________

166

167

168

169

170

START

‘

STOP____________

•

DOWN PERIOD________

DAYS REMAINING

i

176

177

178

179

180

START__________

DOWN PERIOD_________

2of2

-

---

t1~Y—28~2OØ4

.

-

RaL

I ~\;3

PEflDOt,S

JACOBUS

ENERGY, INC~

-

—

-

‘-

-‘

3715

Lexington Avenue

Madison,

WI

53714

608-241-3883

800-822-9608

PrnOct$~d~cizIan0ita

$~st

J.c&nP.tr.1.u~

ProOc*s

Jsc*js

Pstr~

Pr~ètt;

I’ suvplyng

t~

f~k~4~

u~lyz~s

1*

you u

) us.d ~i fI~

btr.r

.s~ct

IU’A

rguIi~ia~s

40

CFR P&n 268

a,4 othii

~,idu~

,~i,

r.q*u~*i4g.

-

•$4~Ii

1411203

?~p4~t

a

-

c.whPA?~pw~~

-

—

~p~tnaU.~U~O7I

-

£~&p1i

-

‘010$

1.3

0$lIi

1sppv

1.7

‘

100P?I4a~à~u~

1S.1’

210

0312S

‘

40~

?P14 ~

123

‘EPA IO~0SI

M~WWI.

01$

07$1

-

i_u

0412

-

‘

‘tcu

T~A2~IM1~

-

EPAIOOIIlt.iU

~

1,11.

-

~wn~

Uz~

~ coi~thI~

ie~s

thu 1,000 P?M of ~tsI

Mi1~

Ii

prwx’sd

hszitdow.

i,*u

‘

ribu11~

r21~yIis

13 petfm*d io

~*

thvswi’s

kazv*~

cou~t~Ms

~

EPA

r~Uo~

40CFL4O(Cp.a~bprtD.

Ii.

evtøy thit thu W~m*ti.n

c~ttainid

twã~

is ~wmd cv~ict

to

I~*

~E

of o~

knowW*,

~

.

-

-

~‘

~i4l*~.dt

I$bctslmq

tu~in~.

fiws cm bi

of t~Thv

isàtmnet,

phua ci4uua~

1’800482-383S

-

-

‘

Qutc~fiuhHeating

&

CoolI~

Services

-

Quidc

Fuet

Ree’

Servlce~.

Jacobus

Environmental

Seivicvs

,

---

__

VI

v.P.

,.~

JACOBUS

ENERGY,

INC.

3715 Let

Avenue

-

-

Madi~,

WI

53714

608.241.3883

800-822.9608

Pra4~cI

Speci

Icgtlomz Data

Shut

JICObQI

Petroleum

Pioducts

~leeobua

Peuaisir~

Pr~d~tt~

Ia

aupp1yu~the

fo6eMn~

waty~z

to

you as mused

elI fuel burner

-

sub~eet

to E1~A

r

lmtio~i

40 CFR Pan 266, and oth& Indivi~uaI~IoIe

roqu~e1T~al3.

T*21~atI

10j29f2003

tthurtcjlEPA

Prrnrty

SflcafiaaUsidOlI

,

.

&,ie~y~ts

.

Test

?OiIwd

At,~c

,

EPPMm,iVs~

CD.I

-

10101

-

2P?Vmwes~e

g.fl

ioias

10rPM

‘

-

0010$

Lied

100 ?PMIWII~*gI

10100

-

vlmPat

14otmF.ffgr~e

03121

TititN.lelMs

4000

P1’II

.q~im.

‘

P4 5C50I~05f

0129

API irivity

,

hA

01200

0412

-

-

I~1A

1~7,B22

0240

PtJg

TSCA

ri~ilsed

-

1.0

EPA

10W191.045

‘

‘

$3U1100F

rue

-

‘

L

Used o1~coi,tgttin~n~rethen 1,000

P?PA of tot~t

Haloguna is

pra*un~d

bsrurdoui, unless

mbuttat

;nMyui

Is per+onr~i

to prm

thur,

sit

no

b.zirdou~

~osThuvnts

per

EPA

,iiv~adons

40 Cffi

26&40

(C~

arid

Subpvl 0.

-

Wi certify that tis

oforn-atfun conteirad hum is uui

end corrlct to its

bust ofsur knowledge

baud

-

~

~nreb~t~ry

tuth~.

if weep Os

a?

Ius1J~r

utistencu,

jisua

eafl vs

ii 1.e00-~82.3835.

H

Steve

Aueck&

Vice

rus~dint

Qckfl~h

Hiaung

&

Ccx,Ling

Service;

.

Qutck

Fuet.Fleet Setvice~

-

Jacobus E,wironrnent~t1

Services

TOTAL

P.~3

TOTAL

P.07

---

I~’f—29--2Oe4

09:46

t.~SROLL It’*3

I’Ec1DOWS

URS

-

Facsimile

To:

Jim

Kalimayer

~EPA

FaairnHe:

~17)

524-5023

From:

Eric

MeMn

-

Date:

5/28/04

-

Pagelof:

7

Updated

information for

Rook Road

asphalt

plan~’Slto

ID:

OO7005ABX and

Site

ID:

Subject

201

SOBABG

Mes~ge:

Jim,

See

the

attached

pages

for

Rock

Road’s

responses to your questions

regarding

the permit

applications for the two sites referenced in

the Subject

line.

Please

call

me at (847)

545-7564 If

you have further questions

-

-

Eric Melvin

URS

Corporation

hAY

2

co~mErrnALrry

~OTZ~

I.JRS CorpOra~on

~

~

~mi~

Ia trucodod solely tar the

One Contmenesl Towers

~

~

of this

t~nsmle~Ion.

Yr

youh~o

zecelved this

(a*

In

~ror,

1701

Golf Road,

S~ite

1000

pI~ natiy c~e

~enaei~

inmc~tiatc1ybyalq~hone.I!

you are no the

Rotting

Meedow~.

WInds 60008

Intended seciplenc, ptc~c

be ad~ed

that dir,en~neñon.

diMbude~.

or

Tot:

847-220-0707

‘

eopyin~

of

the Infonoatlon cont.iricd in

this 1~xi~

strictly prohibited.

Fex847-220-~1116

-

www.uTsoorp.com

---

l1rn’—~-2eg4

09:46

LI~SRCLL.I l—E

~E~Dot~

Rockfoxd

Plant

Xnformztion

I.

Two tankheaters.

a.

Fuel: liquid propane

b.

rithig rates:

1.26 MMBu and

1 MMBtu

2.

MSDS forNo.3

Special:

see attached spec sheet

3.

TAC storage tanks contain asphalt emulsion.

4.

Number ofscreens for crusher:

1

5.

Numberof conveyors for crusher: 6

I.

A

‘tions/dcletions to list ofequipment:

a.

dd Five 30,000 Gallon Liquid Asphal

anks

b.

te Five

25,000

Gallon Liquid

halt Tanks

c.

Delete

0,000 gallon Liquid As

alt Tank

d.

Add One

6

lip diesel-fired

enerator

e.

Add One 100

die.wl-

generator

f.

Add One 127 lip

fired generator

g.

Add One235 lip d

-fired

generator

2.

Changes to emission c

ulatio

.

See revised spreadsheettables.

a.

‘Change

al

maximum

halt

production

rate

for

waste

oil-fired

plant

from

640,000

Y to 300,000

TPY

(

Table

5).

b.

Chan

monthly

maximum asphalt

reduction

rate

for waste

oil-fired

plant

from’

1

,000 TPM to

87,500

TPM

(see

Table

.

c.

or changes to emission calculations for the

sel

generators,

see Table

6.

‘

For changes to plantwide emissions, see Table

8.

---

STATE

OF

ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

P. 0.

BOX

19506

SPRINGFIELD,

ILLINOIS

62794-9506

STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION/DEVELOPMENT PERMITS

ISSUED BY

THE

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

July

1, 1985

The Illinois Environmental

Protection Act (Illinois Revised Statutes,

Chapter

111-1/2,

Section

1039)

authorizes

the

Environmental Protection Agency to impose conditions on permits

which

it issues.

The following conditions are applicable unless susperseded by special condition(s).

1.

Unless this permit has been extended or it has been voided by a newly issued permit, this permit will expire one

year from the date of issuance, unless a continuous program of construction or development on this project has

started by such time.

2.

The construction or development covered by this permit shall be done in compliance with applicable provisions of

the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and Regulations adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board.

3.

There

shall

be no deviations fromthe approved plans and specifications unless awritten requestfor modification,

along with plans

and specifications

as required, shall

have been

submitted

to the

Agency

and a supplemental

written

permit

issued.

4.

The

permittee

shall

allow

any

duly

authorized

agent

of the

Agency

upon

the

presentation

of credentials,

at

reasonable

times:

a.

to enter

the permittee’s property where actual or potential

effluent, emission or noise

sources are located or

‘where any activity

is

to be conducted pursuant

to this permit,

b.

to

have access to and to copy any records required

to be kept under the

terms

and

conditions

of’this

permit,

c.

to inspect, including during

any hours of operation of equipment

constructed

or operated under this permit,

such equipment and any equipment required

to be kept, used, operated, calibrated and maintained under

this

permit,

d.

to obtain

and remove samples

of any

discharge or emissions

of pollutants,

and

e.

to enter and

utilize any photographic,

recording, testing,

monitoring

or other equipment for the

purpose of

preserving,

testing,

monitoring, or recording any activity,

discharge, or emission authorized

by this

permit.

5.

The issuance of this permit:

a.

shall

not

be

considered

as

in

any

manner

affecting

the

title

of

the

premises

upon

which

the

permitted

facilities

are

to be

located,

b.

does not release the perinittee from any liability for damage to person or property caused by or resulting

from

the construction,

maintenance,

or operation of the

proposed facilities,

c.

does not release the permittee

from compliance with other applicable

statutes

and regulations of the United

States,

of the State

of Illinois, or with applicable

local

laws, ordinances

and

regulations,

d.

does

not take into

consideration

or attest

to the structural

stability

of any units

or parts

of the project,

and

IL 532—0226

APC 166

Rev.

5/99

Printedon Recycled Paper

090-005

---

e.

in no manner implies or suggests that the Agency

(or its officers, agents or employees) assumes any liability,

directly

or

indirectly,

for

any

loss

due to

damage, installation,

maintenance,

or operation

of the

proposed

equipment

or facility.

6.

a.

Unless a joint

construction/operation

permit has been issued,

a permit for operation shall be obtained from

the Agency

before the equipment covered

by this permit

is placed into operation.

b.

For purposes

of shakedown and testing,

unless

otherwise specified

by a special permit

ôondition, the equip-

ment

covered under

this

permit may be operated

for a period not

to exceed thirty

(30)

days.

7.

The Agencymay

file a complaint

with the Board

for modification,

suspension or revocation

of a permit:

a.

upon discovery that the permit application contained misrepresentations,

misinformation or false statements

or that

all relevant

facts were not disclosed, or

b.

upon

finding that

any standard

or special conditions

have been violated, or

c.

upon any violations of the Environmental Protection

Act or any regulation effective thereunder as a result of

the

construction

or development authorized

by this permit.

---

Tabl.5

Pat.ntTaf

Em~seLons

from

Wait.OIL.Flred Asphift

Plant

Flrfng

No.2 Fail OH

or

Wi*t. OH

4526

han.Road

Rock

Roid

Compintes, Inc.

Beidders, lithiols

?MIPIA1,

Emle*i~

re,te~

~Maø)

Mo~y

~oà

f~rns~ao)

PW’~4,.

Mnial

£w0ss~o,i

(Ioni~~.mI)

COr

~

Em~c~t

Mot4hIv

Tw~o,~

E~uijor~.

LMo~

(1.n~ii~o)

.co;’

.

r

~miiu1

s

(torpu~và,)

HOR.

~

Ficjcq~

(l~)

ñ0~.

Mc

~in1Mlo!tI

(Ieawliqo)

NO~

Aaww~

£rM

~.i.lysà1

~Mon)

.50,

Mänthly

~

oiáh~e)

SOj

Mn~il

!rW..Lce

(~ons~’piee~

YQM

SfItW&

,acI~~

~on).

you

U5I~

u~o,s

(IonaM,o~

vo~

A~p~l

~

(wnWyw)

o.ZAie~OH~5

Ø.l~3~

-IA

6.0

013

&7

19.5

0.065

24

83

03

I.?

.

~O02

t.4

4.5

0~’~

01)33

14

5.0

0.13

‘

5.7

19.5

04)55

24

tS

,

0.066

2.5

-

8.1

(L0~

IA

4.6

U—

d~4a.~p~ I1~~

—

3PI~OO

(i)AP.&L EWe E~e.O,atw11.1

14c1 ~k Aapt~

P~si~f~

tLI-5.

(bP.42,EThtdb~4ct.~ar

11.t ~MkAI~~

f~

11.1-1.

H$

~

1~. 11.54.

$)Wu~~~ki.,,seeI1..

I~gddC(

B~i*.~

r.s~I ~

IK.~i*l~.

Eu,~KS

cE~s: ~

ke~P~U..t~

~i

K

Il~SOOthr.~ui

.1.I~S

b~n—24~O.l~IQ

£fl~cM

~

~‘$irP~l~U,,

-

O.O~

b~nI

~USO~f

s

210b’bKe

50.1

~i,

!ffi~JP*10qe.

Frcm,~.

West. oi.Pbil

A.olie(t

Vt

-

-‘3

-c

‘—I

---

(1)0.,

i.I~6

tip *eul4bidg.n.mto~

and one

are

tip

dI..Wwed

9.n,rltoE~

(2) On. 100 tip dUeHted gesu,~cr.

on. 127 tip

iiesel4iedpenirahel, isido~.

235 hp ePeadlied 9n.eaiot.

(3) AP-4Z FIIOe E~on,

Lame Staflonsay Dind andAl S~alonaiy

thNI Iu.l

En~rwa,

Chej~sr

3.4,FeU.

3.4~1.

(4) Based we each9enels10s~OpemIke9aw.jthnem ci

1000

eow

pa

peer.

(5)

AP4Z

Fflth Etaton. GeecaisMd DIsseI*~du*W

En~ne.,

Ch.ptev 3.3, Tab’e3.2-1.

(6)

Rued we each ~enaiMot

opere&’g annesknu*ci

1000 ticiars per yest.

(7) S0~

betad on

04

siAu

onntsnt

bywd~hl

ki kaeI.

Table 6

Potential Emissions

from

Five

Diesel-Fired

Gener~to.s

4525 irene Road

Rock Road Companlee, Inc.

ReMdere,

illinois

POWER

EMISSION

FACTORS00

Generators

800

hp’~

,

-

-

-

Generators

.~

600

hp~

EMISSION

RAYES1’~

POWER

EMISSION

FACTORS1~

EMISSiON RATES~

POLUJTA,NT

hp

(Lkip-hr)t1~

(Ibihr)

(tonst)ew)

lip

(~Thp-hr)

QMw)

(ton./~~ar)

(tonsfyear)

SO,

1862

3.2E.O5

0.1

0.1

462

‘

0.002

0.9

-

1.4

1,5

-

NO,,

1802

,

0.02

44.7

44.7

462

0.03

14.3

-

21.5

‘

60.2

P~IPU50

1862

0.0007

1.3

1.3

462

0.0022

1.0

1.5

2.8

CO

1662

0.0055

10.2

10.2

462

-

0.0087

3.1

4.6

14.9

VOM

18.62

-

0.001

1.2

1.2

-

462

0.002

1.1

1.7

2.9

TOTAL

y

-h

-I

Em1ss~ons

E8tIma~es

-

Ireiie

(Diesel Goneratci)

5~8/2004

---

!~Y282~O4

e9:

4?

IRS

ROLL

It~13

PE~DO(LS

Tab~e8

Summary Of Plentw~de.Emisslons

for Drum94ix Aspliaft

Plant

4525

irene

Road

Rock

Road

Companies, Inc

BeMdere, Illinois

---

/b~//~//r~

-7

~

UR~..

-

March 23, 2004

-

Mr.

Jim Ross

-

illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Division ofAir Pollution Control

Permit

Section

1021

North GrandAvenue, East

-

Springfield,

illinois

62702

DearMr.

Ross:

-

.

On behalfofRock Road Companies, Inc., URS encloses two copies

of a

request

to

amend

a federally enforceable state operating permit (FESOP) for an asphalt manufacturing

plant

located

at

801

Beale

Court

in

Rockford,

illinois

(Site

I.D~No.

is

201’8O8ABG).

The

enclosed includes all applicable illinois air

permit

application forms.

Ifyou have any

questions concerning

this application, please call me at (847) 228-0707.

Sincerely

-

-

URS Corporation

EricMelvin

Air Services Project Manager

Enclosure:

-

Cc: Steve Kennedy

-

-

-

MAR24

2004

a

~

-

DAPC

-

URS

Corporation

One ContinentalTowers

1701 Golf

Road,

Suite 1000

Rolling

Meadows,

IL 60008

Tel: 847.228.0707

-

~

~47

~

111

~

---

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT

~AI

~

CONSTRUCT

~

OPERATE

Amendment to

existing opera

NAME

OF EQUIPMENT TO BE

CONSTRUCTED OR OPERATED

Beale Court

Asphalt

Plant

ting permit

(B)

ID. NO.

PERMIT

NO.

-

DATE

FORAGENCY USE ONLY

~i1/

?~3

~4A9~

~

~/~4/t~7ff/

la

NAME OF OWNER:

Rock

Road Companies,

Inc.

lb.

STREET

ADDRESS OF

OWNER:

301

West To~nIine

Road

1

C.

id

CITY OF OWNER:

Janesville

STATE OF OWNER:

Wisconsin

le.

ZIP CODE:

53547

2a.

NAME OF OPERATOR:

Rock Road

Companies, Inc.

2b.

STREET ADDRESS OF OPERATOR:

301

West

Townllne

Road

2c.

2d.

CITY

OF OPERATOR:

Janesville

STATE OF OPERATOR:

Wisconsin

2e.

ZIP

CODE:

53547

I

3a.

NAME OF CORPORATE DIVISION OR

PLANT:

Beale Court Asphalt Plant

3c.

CITY

OF EMISSION SOURCE:

3d.

LOG

ATED WITHI N

CITY

Rockford

LIMITS:

YES ~

NO

3b.

STREET ADDRESS OF EMISSION SOURCE:

801

Beale Court

3e.

TOWNSHIP:

3f.

COUNTY:

3g.

ZIP CODE:

Rockford

Boone

61109

4.

ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:

(liTLE AND/OR NAME OF INDIVIDUAL)

Steve Kennedy

..

6.

AUut-tt~S

FO R

~utu~~t:

(CHECK ONLY ONE)

OWNER

0

OPERATOR

D

EMISSION

SOURCE

5.

YOUR

DESIGNATION FORTHIS APPLICATION:

(C)

-Be a

I

e C our

7.

WHO IS THE PERMIT APPLICANT?

OWNER

0

OPERATOR

STATE OF ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

PERMIT SECTION

P.O.

BOX

19506

SPRINGFIELD,

ILLINOIS 62794-9506

This Agency is authonzed to require andyou

must disclose this information under415

ILCS 5/39.

Failure to do so could

result in

the

application being

denied and penalties

under4l5 ILCS 5 et seq.

It is not

necessary

to use this fosm in

providing

this information.

This form has been

approved

by the

forms

management center.

TYPED

OR P~RI~ED

NAME OF SIGNER

DATE

8.

THE

UNDERSIGNED HEREBY MAKES APPLICATION

FOR A PERMIT AND CERTIFIES THAT THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN

ARE TRUEAND CORRECT, AND FURTHERCERTIFIES

THAT

ALL PREVIOUSLY SUBMITI

QF3M~TIQt’i-f3~FERENCED

IN THIS

APPLICATION

REMAINS TRUE, CORRECT AND CURRENT.

BY

AFFIXING HIS/HER SIG~

~-HE~t~ffIE~J.ftJDERSIGNED

FURTHER

CERTIFIES THAT HE/SHE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THIS APPLICATION.

~IAR

2 ~

SIGNATURE

~

~

;-‘~-j~

DATE

TYPED OR

PRINTED NAME OF SIGNER

TITLE OF ~IGNER

TITLE OF SIGNER

(A)

THISFORM ISTOPROVIDETHE ILLINOIS EPAWITHGENERAL INFORMATIONABOUT THE EQUIPMENTTOBECONSTRUCTEDOR

OPERATED. THIS FORM

MAY

BE USEDTOREQUESTACONSTRUCTIONPERMIT,ANOPERATING PERMIT.ORAJOINT

CONSTRUCTION AND

OPERATING

PERMIT.

(B)

ENTER THE GENERIC NAME OF THE

EQUIPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR OPERATED.

THIS NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE

PERMIT

WHICH

MAY

BE ISSUED

PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION.

THIS FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY OTHER APPLICABLE

FORMS

AND

INFORMATION.

-

(C)

PROVIDE A DESIGNATION

IN ITEM 5 ABOVE WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE

THE ILLINOIS EPA TO USE

FOR IDENTIFICATION OF YOUR

EQUIPMENT. YOUR DESIGNATION WILL BE

REFERENCED IN CORRESPONDENCE

FROM THIS AGENCY RELATIVE TO THIS

APPLICATION.

YOUR DESIGNATION

MUST NOT EXCEED TEN

(10) CHARACTERS.

(OPTIONAL)

(0)

THIS APPLICATION MUST BE

SIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 35 ILL. ADM. CODE

201.154

OR 201.159 WHICH STATES: MALL

APPLICATIONS AND SUPPLEMENTS THERETO SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER AND OPERATOR

OF THE EMISSION SOURCE OR

AIR POLLUTION

CONTROL EQUIPMENT. OR THEIR AUTHORIZED AGENT, AND SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY EVIDENCE OF

AUTHORITY TO SIGN THE APPLICATIQN.~

IF THE OWNER OR OPERATOR IS A

CORPORATION, SUCH CORPORATION MUST HAVE ON FILE WITH THE

ILLINOIS EPA A CERTIFIED

COPY OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CORPORATION’S

BOARDOF DIRECTORS AUTHORIZING THE PERSONS SIGNING THIS

APPLICATION TO CAUSE OR ALLOW THE

CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION OF

THE

EQUIPMENT TO BE COVERED

BY THE PERMIT.

IL

532-0238

ADr~

fln~.

Printed

on

Recycled

Paper

PAGE

1

OF 2

---

•

B~LLINGINFORMATION

10.

CONTACT PERSON FOR APPLICATION:

Steve

Kennedy

9a.

COMPANY NAME:

Rock Road Companies,

Inc.

11.

CONTACT

PERSON’S TELEPHONENUMBER:

(608)

752-8922’

9b.

STREET

ADDRESS:

301

West Townline Road

12.

CONTACT PERSONS

FACSIMILE NUMBER:

(608)

365-8146

9c.

CITY:

Janesville

13.

FEDERAL

EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION

NUMBER (FEIN)

9d.

STATE:

9f.

BILLING CONTACT PERSON:

WI

Steve

Kennedy

14.

PRIMARY STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC) CATEGORY:

Asphalt

Manufacturing

9e.

ZIP

CODE:

9g.

CONTACT TELEPHONE NO.:

53547

(608) 752-8922

15.

PRIMARY SIC

NUMBER:

16. TAXPAYER

IDENTIFICATION

NUMBER (TIN):

2951

17.

DOES THE APPLICATION CONTAIN A PLOT PLAN/MAP:

DYES

ZNO

IF THE PLOT PLAN/MAP HAS

PREVIOUSLY

BEEN

SUBMITTED, SPECIFY:

I.D.NO.:

201808ABG

APPLICATIONNUMBER

72110724

IS THE APPROXIMATE SIZE OF APPLICANT’S

PREMISES LESS THAN

1

ACRE?

YES

0

NO

IF “NOw,

SPECIFY

ACRES

18.

DOES THE APPLICATION

CONTAIN A PROCESS

FLOW DIAGRAM(S) THAT ACCURATELY AND

CLEARLY REPRESENTS CURRENT

PRACTICE.

0

YES

Z

NO

19.

IS THE EMISSION UNIT COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION

ALREADY CONSTRUCTED?

~

YES

0

NO

IF “YES”.

PROVIDE THE DATE CONSTRUCTION WAS COMPLETED:

20.

IF THIS APPLICATION INCORPORATES

BY REFERENCE A PREVIOUSLY GRANTED PERMIT(S). HAS FORM APC-210,

DATA AND

INFORMATION-INCORPORATION

BY REFERENCE”

BEEN SUBMITTED?

~

YES

0

NO

~_

~

21.

DOES THE STARTUP OF AN EMISSION UNIT COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION PRODUCE AIR CONTAMINANT EMISSIONS

IN

EXCESS OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS?

DYES

ZNO

IF “YES”. HAS FORM APC-203,

“OPERATION DURING

STARTUP” BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS UNIT?

DYES

DN0

0

~

~

~

22.

DOES THIS APPLICATION

REQUEST PERMISSION TO OPERATE AN EMISSION

UNIT DURING MALFUNCTIONS OR

BREAKDOWNS?

DYES

~NO

IF “YES”. HAS FORM APC-204. “OPERATION

DURING MALFUNCTION AND BREAKDOWN” BEEN COMPLETED FOR THIS UNIT?

DYES

DNO

-

-

0

~

IL

-

~,

~

23.

IS AN EMISSION UNITCOVERED

BY THIS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO A FUTURE COMPLIANCE DATE?

DYES

~NO

IF “YES”. HAS FORM APC-202, “COMPLIANCE

PROGRAM

& PROJECT COMPLETION SCHEDULE”

BEEN

COMPLETED

FOR ThIS

UNIT?

-

DYES

DNO

0~

~

24.

DOES THE SOURCE COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION

REQUIRE AN EPISODE ACTION PLAN

(REFER TO GUIDEUNES

FOR

EPISODE ACTION PLANS)?

DYES

ZNO

-

25.

LIST AND IDENTIFY ALL FORMS, EXHIBITS. AND OTHER INFORMATION SUBMITTED AS PART OF

THIS APPLICATION.

INCLUDE

THE

PAGE NUMBERS OF EACH

ITEM (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY):

APC200

APC22O

APC26O

Support document

‘

-

Permit ID:

72110724

APC2IO

APC

197

TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES

APC

200

PAGE

2

OF

2

---

-

ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DIVISION OF AIR

POLLUTION CONTROL

—

PERMIT SECTION

P.O.

BOX

19506

SPRINGFIELD,

ILLINOIS

62794-9506

-

CONSTRUCTION PERMiT

APPLICATION

-

-

ID NUMBER:

p ~i

~‘

PERMITt

~‘

V

o

3

c~’o

4’

0

COMPLETE

j~

I

DATE COMPLETE

-J

INCOMPLETE

(!1

I

~

A~N~E~Q

(7~fi~

THIS FORM

IS TO BE USED BY

ALL

SOURCES

TO SUPPLY FEE INFORMATION

THAT

MUST

ACCOMPANY ALL

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATIONS.

THIS APPLICATION MUST INCLUDEPAYMENT

IN FULL TO BE DEEMED

COMPLETE~MAKE

CHECK OR MONEY ORDER PAYABLE TO THE ILUNOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

SEND TO

THE ADDRESS ABOVE.

DO NOT SEND CASH.

REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS (197-INST)

FOR

ASSISTANCE.

2

•

)

PROJEC

Beale

T NAME:

Court

I

Request

to

amend

FESOP

I

3)

SOURCE

ID NO.

(IF APPLICABLE):

201808ABG

4)

FILL

IN

THE FOLLOWING

THREE

BOXES AS DETERMINED

IN

SECTIONS

1

THROUGH

4 BELOW.

0

•

2,000

2,000

SECTION 2,3 OR 4 SUBTOTAL

THIS

AGENCY Is AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE

AND YOU

MUST DISCLOSE

THIS

INFORMATION UNDER 415 ILCS 5/39: FAILURE TO

DO

SO

COUI.D

RESULT IN THE

APPLICATiON

BEING DENIED

AND

PENALTIES UNDER 415

LCS

5 E~

SEQ.

IT

IS NOT NECESSARYTO

USE THIS

FORM

IN

PROVIDING THIS INFORMATION.

THIS

FORM HAS

BEEN

APPROVED BY

THE

FORMS

MANAGEMENT

CENTER.

-

APPLICATION

PAGE

_____

Printed

on

Recycled

Papec

1O7J~

I

s—------

1)

SOURCE NAME:

Rock

Road

Companies,

Inc.

SECTION

1

SUBTOTAL

GRAND TOTAL

5) YOUR APPLICATION WiLL FALL UNDER ONLY ONE OF THE FOLLCM~1NGSIX CATEGORIES

DESCRIBED BELOW.

CHECK THE BOX THAT APPLIES.

ENTER

THE CORRESPONDING FEE

IN ThE BOX TO THE

RIGHTANDCOPY

THIS

FEE INTO THE SECTION

1

SUBTOTAL

BOXABOVE.

PROCEED

TO

APPLICABLE

SECTIONS.

FOR

PURPOSES OF THIS

FORM:

•

MAJOR

SOURCE

IS A SOURCE

THAT

IS REQUIRED TO

OBTAIN A CMPP

PERMIT.

•

S~rWTHE11C

MINOR

SOURCE IS A SOURCE

THAT

HAS TAKEN UMITS ON POTENTIAL TO EMIT IN A

PERMIT TO AVOID

CMPP

PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (E.G.. FESOP).

•

NON-MAJOR

SOURCE IS A SOURCE THAT IS

NOT A MAJOR

OR SYNTHETIC MINOR SOURCE.

EXISTING SOURCE WITHOUT STATUS CHANGE OR WITH STATUS CHANGE FROM SYNTHETIC

MINOR TO MAJOR SOURCE OR VICE VERSA.

ENTER $0 AND PROCEED

TO

SECTION 2.

D

EXISTING NON-MAJOR

SOURCE

THAT WILL BECOME SYNTHETiC

MINOR OR MAJOR

SOURCE.

ENTER 55.000 AND PROCEED TO SECTION

4.

-

D

EXISTINGP~OR

OR SYNTHETIC MINOR SOURCE THAT~

BECOME

NON-MAJOR

SOURCE.

ENTER $4,000

AND

PROCEED TO SECTION 3.

O

NEW MAJOR

OR SYNTHETIC MINOR SOURCE.

ENTER $5,000

AND PROCEED

TO SECTION 4,, ~

O

NEW NON-MAJOR SOURCE.

ENTER $500

AND

PROCEED TO

SECTION

~.

.

—.

AGENCY ERROR.

IF THIS IS A TIMELY REQUEST TO CORRECT AN

ISSUED

PERMIT

THAT

D

INVOLVES

ONLY AN AGENCY ERROR

AND

IF

THE

REQUEST IS

RECEIVED WiTHIN THE

DEADLINE

FOR

A PERMIT

APPEAL

TO ThE POLLUTION CONTROL

BOARD.

THEN ENTER $0.

SKIP SECTIONS 2,3

AND

4.

PROCEED DIRECTLY TO SECTION 5.

•

~

-.

$0

SECTION4.

-

24

2004

).~PL~

-

6) FILING FEE.

IF

THE

APPLICATION ONLY

ADDRESSES

ONE OR

MORE

OF

THE FOLLOWiNG.

CHECKTHE

-

-

APPROPRIATE BOXES,

ENTER

$500

IN

THE

SECOND BOX

UNDER FEE DETERMINATION

ABOVE. SKIP SECTIONS

3

AND

4

AND

PROCEED DIRECTLY TO SECTION

5.

OTHERWISE. PROCEED TO SECTION 3OR 4, AS

APPROPRIATE.

o

ADDITION OR REPLACEMENT OF CONTROL DEVICES ON

PERMITTED UNITS

o

PILOT PROJECTS/TRIAL BURNS BYA PERMITTED UNIT

-

o

APPLICATIONS ONLY INVOLVING INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES UNDER 351AC

~01210

(MAJORSOURCES

ONLY~

o

LAND REMEDIATION PROJECTS

o

REVISIONS RELATED TO

P~IETHODOLOGYOR

TIMING

FOR EMISSION

TESTING

o

MINORADMINISTRATIVE-TYPE

CHANGE TO A PERMIT

Page

1 of 2

---

.$EcT!ON~3:;EEES

FOR CURRENT~OR.PROJECTED

NON-MAJOR SOURCES~:

-.

~‘)

IF THIS APPLICATION CONSISTS OF A SINGLE NEW

EMISSION

UNIT

Q~

NO MORE THAN

iWO

MODIFIED EMISSION UNITS. ENTER

$500.

7)

8)

IF THIS APPLICATION CONSISTS OF MORE THAN

ONE

NEW

EMISSION UNIT

Q~

MORE THAN

TWO MODIFIED UNITS. ENTER

$1,000.

-

8)

9)

IF THIS APPLICATION CONSISTS OF A

NEW SOURCE

OR EMISSION UNIT SUBJECT TO SECTION

39.2 OF THE ACT (I.E., LOCAL SITING REVIEW); A COMMERCIAL INCINERATOR OR A MUNICIPAL

WASTE.

HAZARDOUS

WASTE,

OR WASTE TIRE INCINERATOR; A COMMERCIAL POWER

GENERATOR; OR AN

EMISSION UNIT DESIGNATED AS A COMPLEX SOURCE

BY AGENCY

RULEMAKING,

ENTER $15,000.

-

9)

10)IFAPUBLIC HEARING IS HELD (SEE

INSTRUCTIONS), ENTER $10,000.

10)

11) SECTION

3 SUBTOTAL

(ADD

LINES 7 THROUGH

10) TO BE ENTERED ON

PAGE 1.

AppUcatiói~

Contains

Modified

Emission Units

Only

12)

FOR THE FIRST MODIFIED EMISSIu. I UNIT, EL.

..

2,000.

11)

13)

NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL MODIFIED EMISSION UNITS

=

_____

X $1,000.

Application

Contains

New

MdIOr Modified

Emission

Units

14)

LINE 12

PLUS

LINE

13, OR

$5,000, WHICHEVER

IS LESS.

12)

15)

FOR

THE FIRST NEWEMISSION UNIT,

ENTER $4,000.

0

16) NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL

NEWAND/OR

MODIFIED

EMISSION UNITS

=

X

$1,000.

Application

Contains Netting

Exercise

17) LINE 15

PLUS

LINE

16, OR $10,000, WHICHEVER IS LESS.

15)

18) NUMBER OF

INDIViDUAL POLLUTANTS

THAT RELY ON A

NETTING EXERCISE OR CONTEMPORANEOUS EMISSIONS

DECREASE

TO AVOID APPLICATION OF

PSD OR

NONATTAINMENT

NSR

=______

X $3,000.

19) IF ThE

NEW

SOURCE OR

EMISSION

UNIT IS SUBJECT TO

SECTION

39.2

OF THE ACT (I.E.. SITING);

A COMMERCIAL

INCINERATOR OR OTHER MUNICIPALWASTE,

HAZARDOUS

WASTE. OR

WASTE TIRE INCINERATOR; A

COMMERCIAL POWER GENERATOR;

OR

ONE

OR MORE

OTHER EMISSION UNITS

DESIGNATED AS A COMPLEX

SOURCE BY AGENCY RULEMAKING. ENTER $25,000.

20)

IF THE SOURCE IS A

NEW

MAJOR SOURCE

SUBJECT TO

PSD, ENTER

$12,000.

Additional

Supplemental

Fees

21)

IF THE PROJECT IS A

MAJOR

MODIFICATION SUBJECT TO

PSD, ENTER $6,000.

22) IF THIS ISA NEW MAJOR SOURCE SUBJECT TO

NONATTAINMENT (NAA)

NSR.

ENTER

$20.000.

23) IF THIS IS A

MAJOR MOOIFICATION SUBJECT

TO NAA

NSR,.

ENTER $12,000.

21)

24)

IF APPLICATION INVOLVES A DETERMINATION OF

CLEAN

UNIT STATUS

AND

THEREFORE IS

NOT

SUBJECT TO BACT

OR

LAER,

ENTER 55.000 PER UNITFOR

WHICH A

DETERMINATIONIS REQUESTED OR OTHERWISE

REQUIRED.

X $5,000.

-

25)

IF

APPLICATION

INVOLVES A

DETERMINATION OF

MACI

FOR A POLLUTANT AND THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT

TO

BACT

OR

LAER

FOR

THE

RELATED POLLUTANT

UNDER

PSD OR NSR (E.G..

VOM

FOR

ORGANIC HAP),

ENTER $5,000 PER UNIT

FOR

WHICH A DETERMINATION

IS

REQUESTED OR

OTHERWiSE

REQUIRED.

X

$5,000.

24)

26)

IF A

PUBLIC HEARING

IS HELD (SEE INSTRUCTIONS),

ENTER

$10,000.

27) SECTION 4 SUBTOTAL (ADD LINES

14

AND

LINES 17 THROUGH

26)

TO BE

A SIGNED CERTIFICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE.

1.

127;

2000

)F

LAW THAT,

BASED ON

INFORMATION AND BELIEF FORMED

AFTER REASONABLE

TION

CONTAINED IN THIS FEE APPLICATION FORM IS TRUE, ACC

RATE

AND

COMPLETE.

TYPED

OR PRINTED

NAME OFSIGNATORY

~

TITLEOF

SIGNATORY

3

/

jc~~

,____

DATE

APPLICATION PAGE

______

Printed on

Recycled

Paper

Page

2

of 2

1Q7-c~

---

Request To Amend Federally Enforceable State

Operating

Permit (FESOP)

For a Natural Gas-FiredDrum-Mix Asphalt Plant

801

Beale Court, Rockford, Illinois

Rock Road Companies, Inc.

301

West Townline Road

P.O. Box 1779

Janesville, Wisconsin 53547

March, 2004

Prepared by:

URS Corporation

Rolling Meadows, IL

---

REQUEST

TO AMEND

FEDERALLY ENFORCEABLE STATE OPERATING PERMIT (FESOP)

FOR A NATURAL GAS-FIRED DRUM-MIX ASPHALT PLANT

801 BEALE COURT, ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS

SITE

ID: 201808ABG

For

Rock Road

Companies,

Inc.

Janesville, Wisconsin

53547

Submitted By

Rock Road Companies, Inc.

301

West Townline Road

P.O.Box

1779

-

-

Janesville, Wisconsin

53547

-

Phone (608) 752-8922

Fax (608) 365-8146

Prepared

by

URS

Corporation

One ContInental Towers, Suite

1000

1701

GolfRoad

-

Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008

Phone (847) 228-0707

Fax (847) 228-1115

Contact: Mr. Eric Melvin orMr. Jim Powell

Email

: eric_melvin@urscorp.com jim powell@urscorp.com

---

STATE

OF ILLINOIS

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DIVISION OFAIR POLLUTION CONTROL

PERMIT SECTION

P. 0.

BOX

19506

-

SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794-9506

This

Agency is

authorized

to

require

and

you

must disclose Ihis information under 415

--

ILCS

5/39.

Failure to

do

~ocould

result

in

the

application

being denied

and

penalties

under 415 ILCS

5

et seq.

ft

is

not necessary

to use

this form

in

providing

this

inforniation.

This

form

has been

approved

by the.

forms

management center.

APPLICATION FOR

(M

~

CONSTRUCT

~

OPERATE Amendment to existing opera

-

NAMEOFEQUIPMENTTO BE

CONSTRUCTED OR OPERATED

Beale

Court

Asphalt Plant

ting

permit

(B)

I.D. NO.

PERMIT

NO.

DATE

FOR AGENCY USE ONLY

$~J

~?4d.8ô

//~1L~’~

~/~/~/t2~/

la.

NAME OF OWNER:

Rock

Road

Companies,

Inc.

lb.

~

I

ADDRESS

OF OWNER:

301

West Townline

Road

lc.

CITY

OF OWNER:

Janesville

ld.

STATE OF OWNER:

Wisconsin

le.

ZIP CODE:

53547

3a.

-

.NAME OF

CORPORATE DIVISION OR PLANT:

Beale

Court

Asphalt Plant

3c.

CITY OF EMISSION SOURCE:

3d.

LOCAT ED WITHIN CITY

Rockford

LIMITS: ~

YES

NO

4.

ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: (TITLE AND/OR NAME OF INDIVIDUAL)

Steve Kennedy

2a.

NAME OF OPERATOR:

Rock Road

Companies, Inc.

2b.

STREET ADDRESS

OF OPERATOR:

301

West Townline Road

2c.

CITY OF OPERATOR:

Janesville

2d.

STATE OF OPERATOR:

Wisconsin

2e.

ZIP

CODE:

53547

Sb.

STREET ADDRESS OF

EMISSION SOURCE:

-

801

Beale

Court

Sb.

TOWNSHIP:

3f.

COUNTY:

-

3g. ZIP CODE:

Rockford

Boone

61109

6.

ADDRESS

FOR CORRESPONDENCE:

(CHECK ONLY ONE)

OWNER

fl

OPERATOR

J

EMISSIONSOURCE

7.

WHO IS THE PERMIT APPLICANT?

OWNER

OPERATOR

5.

YOUR DESIGNATION FOR THIS APPLICATION: ~c

Beal

e

C

ourt

I

8.

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY MAKES APPLICATION

FOR

A PERMIT AND CERTIFIES THAT THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED

HEREIN

ERENCED

IN THIS

ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, AND FURTHER CERTIFiES

THAT

ALL PREVIOUSLY ~

FURTHER

APPLICATION

REMAINS TRUE, CORRECT AND CURRENT.

BY AFFIXING HIS/HER SIG

CERTIFIES THAT HEISHE IS

AUTHORIZED

TO EXECUTE THIS APPLICATION.

MAR

2

4

20(i4

SIGNATURE

~

DAPC

-

&H~LL~

DATE

TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF SIGNER

TITLE

OF SIGNER

TITLE OF SIGNER

(A)

THIS FORM IS TO PROVIDE THE ILLINOIS

EPA

WITh GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE EQUIPMENT TO

BE CONSTRUCTED OR

OPERATED.

THIS FORM MAY BE USED TO REQUEST A CONSTRUCTION

PERMIT. AN OPERATING

PERMIT. OR A JOINT

CONSTRUCTION

AND OPERATING

PERMIT.

-

-

-

(B)

ENTER THE GENERIC NAME OF THE EQUIPMENT TO

BE

CONSTRUCTED

OR OPERATED.

THIS

NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE PERMIT

WHICH MAY

BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPUCATION.

ThIS

FORM MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY OTHER APPLICABLE

FORMS

AND

INFORMATION.

(C)

PROVIDE

A DESIGNATION IN

ITEM 5 ABOVE WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE THE

ILLINOIS EPA TO USE FOR IDENTIFICATION OF YOUR

EQUIPMENT.

YOUR DESIGNATION

WILL BE

REFERENCED

IN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THIS AGENCY RELATIVE TO THIS

APPLICATION.

YOUR

DESIGNATION

MUST NOT EXCEED TEN

(10) CHARACTERS.

(OPTIONAL)

(D)

THIS APPLICATION MUST-BE SIGNED IN

ACCORDANCEWITH 35

ILL. ADM. CODE 201.154 OR

201.159 WHICH

STATES: MALL

APPLICATIONS

AND SUPPLEMENTS THERETO SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF THE EMISSION SOURCE OR

AIR

POLLUTION

CONTROL EQUIPMENT, OR THEIR AUTHORIZED AGENT. AND SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY EVIDENCE OF

AUTHORITY

TO SIGN THE APPLICATION.”

IF THE OWNER OR OPERATOR

IS A CORPORATION,

SUCH CORPORATION MUST HAVE

ON

FILE WITH THE ILLINOIS

EPA A CERTIFIED

COPY OF A RESOLUTION

OF THE CORPORATION’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS

AUTHORIZING THE

PERSONS SIGNING THIS

APPLICATION

TO

CAUSE OR ALLOWTHE CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION OF THE

EQUIPMENT TO BE COVERED BY THE

PERMIT.

TYPED OR P~l~ED

NAME

OF SIGNER

1/~~:’

BY

DATE

r

L

IL 532-0238

APC

200

PFV

R/99

Printed

on

Recycled Paper

PAGE

1

OF 2

---

BILLI~4GINFORMATION

-

10.

CONTACT PERSON FOR APPLICATION:

-

-

Steve Kennedy

9a.

COMPANY NAME:

Rock Road Companies. Inc.

-

11.

CONTACT PERSON’S TELEPHONE

NUMBER:

(608) 752-8922

9b.

STREET

ADDRESS:

301

West Townline

Road

-

cc.

CITY:

Janesville

12.

CONTACT PERSON’S FACSIMILE

NUMBER:

(608)365-8146

13.

FEDERAL

EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION

NUMBER (FEIN)

9d.

STATE:

9f.

BILLING CONTACT PERSON:

WI

Steve Kennedy

-

14.

PRIMARY

STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION

(SIC) CATEGORY:

Asphalt

Manufacturing

9e.

ZIP CODE:

9g.

CONTACT TELEPHONE

NO.:

53547

(608) 752-8922

15.

PRIMARY

SIC NUMBER:

16.

TAXPAYER

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN):

2951

17.

DOES THE APPLICATION

CONTAIN A PLOT PLAN/MAP:

0

YES

~

NO

IF THE PLOT PLAN/MAP

HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN SUBMITTED, SPECIFY:

-

-

I.

D. NO.:

2

0

1

8

0

8

A

B

G

APPLICATION NUMBER

7

2

1

1

0

7

2

4

IS THE APPROXIMATE SIZE OF APPLICANT’S

PREMISES LESS THAN

1

ACRE?

.I~

YES

~J

NO

IF”NO”, SPECIFY

ACRES

e.

flOES THE APPLICATION CONTAIN A PROCESS FLOW

DIAGRAM(S) THAT ACCURATELY AND CLEARLY

REPRESENTS CURRENT

PRACTICE.

~

YES

~

NO

19.

IS THE

EMISSION UNIT COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION

ALREADY CONSTRUCTED?

~

YES

D

NO

IF

“YES”, PROVIDE THE

DATE CONSTRUCTIONWAS COMPLETED:

20.

IF THIS APPLICATION

INCORPORATES BY

REFERENCE A PREVIOUSLY

GRANTED PERMIT(S), HAS FORM APC-210, ~DATA

AND

INFORMATION-INCORPORATION BY

REFERENCE” BEEN SUBMITTED?

~

YES

0

NO

21.

DOES

THE STARTUP OF AN EMISSION UNIT COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION PRODUCE AIR

CONTAMINANT EMISSIONS

IN

EXCESSOFAPPLICABLE STANDARDS?

-

DYES-ZNO

IF “YES”,

HAS FORM APC-203, “OPERATION

DURING STARTUP” BEEN COMPLETED FORTHIS

UNIT?

~

0

YES

0

NO

c~

~

~

w

22.

DOES

THIS APPLICATION

REQUEST PERMISSION TO OPERATE AN EMISSION

UNIT DURING MALFUNCTIONS OR

BREAKDOWNS?

DYES

ZNO

IF “YES~,HAS FORM APC-204, “OPERATION DURING MALFUNCTION AND BREAKDOWN” BEEN

COMPLETED FOR THIS UNIT?

DYES

DN0

-

0

~

-

~.

~

23.

IS AN EMISSION

UNITCOVERED BY THIS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO A

FUTURE COMPLIANCE DATE?

-

DYES

ZNO

IF “YES”, HAS

FORM APC-202, “COMPLIANCE PROGRAM & PROJECT COMPLETION SCHEDULE”

BEEN

COMPLETED FOR THIS

UNIT?

DYES

DNa

-

24.

DOES

THE SOURCE COVERED BY

THIS APPLICATION REQUIRE AN EPISODE ACTION

PLAN (REFER TO GUIDELINES FOR

EPISODE

ACTION PLANS)?

-

-

DYES

ZNO

25.

LIST AND IDENTIFY ALL

FORMS, EXHIBITS.

AND OTHER

INFORMATION SUBMITTED AS

PART OF THIS APPLICATION.

INCLUDE THE

PAGE NUMBERS OF EACH ITEM (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY):

-

-

TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES

APC200

-

APC22O

APC26O

Support document

Permit ID: 721

10724

APC2

ID

APC 197

APC 200

PAGE 2 OF 2

---

-

APPLICATION

.

-

ID NUMBER:

/4

—

PERMIT#:

~

~/t’

3

c’O

4’

0

COMPLETE

411

DATE

COMPLETE:

/

INCOMPLETE

I:!

J

~

~

THIS

FORM

IS TO BE USED BY

ALL

SOURCES TO SUPPLY

FEE INFORMATION

THAT

MUST

ACCOMPANY ALL

CONSTRUCTION

PERMIT APPLICA11ONS.

THIS APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE PAYMENT

IN FULL TO BE DEEMED

COMPLETE.

MAKE CHECK OR MONEY ORDER PAYABLE

TO THE ILUNOIS ENViRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

SEND TO

THE

ADDRESS

ABOVE.

DO

NOT SEND CASH.

REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS (197-INST) FOR ASSISTANCE.

2)

PROJEC

Beale

7 NAME:

Court

Request

to

amend

I

FESOP

I

3)

SOURCE

ID NO. (IF APPUCABLE):

201808AEG

4) FILL IN THE

FOLLO’vING

THREE BOXES AS DETERMINED IN SECTIONS

1

THROUGH 4

BELOW:

0

2,000

2,000

-

SECTION

1

SUBTOTAL

SECTION 2,3 OR 4 SUBTOTAL

GRAND

TOTAL

I~

THIS AGENCY IS AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE

AND

YOU MUST DISCLOSE THIS

INFORMATION

UNDER415 ILCS 5/39.

FAILURE TO DO

SO

COULD

RESULT IN THE

APPLICATION BEING DENIED AND

PENALTIES UNDER 415 tICS

5

ET SEQ.

IT

IS NOT NECESSARY TO

USE THIS

FORM IN PROVIDING THIS INFORMATION.

THIS FORM

HAS

BEEN APPROVED

BY THE FORMS MANAGEMENT CENTER.

-

APPLICATION

PAGE

______

Printed on Recycled Paper

197-FEE

ILLINOIS ENViRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DIVISION OF AIR

POLLUTION CONTROL

—

PERMIT SECTION

-

-

P.O.

BOX

19506

-

SPRINGFIELD,

ILLINOIS

62794-9506

1)

SOURCE NAME:

Rock

Road

Companies,

Inc.

5) YOUR APPLICATION WILL FALL UNDER ONLY

ONE OF THE

FOLLOWING

SIX

CATEGORIES DESCRIBED BELOW.

CHECK ThE BOX

THAT

APPLIES.

ENTER THE CORRESPONDING FEE IN THE BOX TO THE RIGHT

AND COPY THIS

FEE

INTO THE SECTION

1

SUBTOTAL

BOX ABOVE.

PROCEED TO APPLICABLE SECTIONS.

FOR

PURPOSES OF THIS FORM:

•

MAJOR SOURCE