RECE~VED
CLERK’S OFFICE
OCT
6 2(104
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Board
October
5,
2004
Suite 1650
25 East Washington Street
Chicago Illinois
60602-1708
Tel: 312-427-4256
Fax: 312-427-6251
svsvv~.openlandsorg
Board of Directors
Pietic/eni
Susan Bell
Trcasurer
Paul
L. Becker
Scireta,
Nancy W. Sutherl and
Vice Pies/dent
Ac/iiijnisti’a!ioii
Andrew Ott
i
17cc Pie sic/cut
Dece/opuicit!
Jonathan C. Hamill
07cc
Pies/c/c/it
Pia,i~icuu
Ellen C. Newcomer
Vice Pre.sic/e,ti
Pa/icy
J.
Timothy Ritchie
Past
Ps’.sic/e;ii
Tony Dean
Donn F.
Daily. Ph.D.
Shaun C.
Block
Richard J.
Carlson. Ph.D.
George W. Davis
Victoria C. Drake
Mary S. Mills Dunea
Philip J. Enquist. FAIA
Lynn
B. Evans
Joseph
Ni. Flavin
John M. Hai~ht.III
Diane L.
Hamburger
Daniel
Kearner
Iris J. Krieg
Jan15 Wellin Notz
George W~Overton
Charles Saltzman
Georgiana Taylor
George H. Waie. Ph.D.
Honorary Due eta;:
Marshall Field V
Jack Guth
Brooks NicCormick
Louise B. Young
Eves
itt/ic Di,nctor
Gerald W. Adelmann
Afli
I/ate
CorLands
Dorothy
Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois
Pollution ControlBoard
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
In re: R04-21
Dear
Ms.
Gunn:
Openlands Project is a 40-year old non-profit organization dedicated to preserving
and
enhancing public open space in northeastern Illinois. Openlands Project
appreciates the opportunity to comment on IEPA’s proposal to revise the
Radium
Water Quality Standards to increase the allowable
amount
ofradium from one
picocurie per liter to five picocuries per liter.
Openlands is concerned about this proposed
rule
change. Specifically, we urge
the Board not to adopt the proposal until more information is available about the
possibleharmful effects ofsuch a change on aquatic
life and drinking
water
supplies. We understand that information
may
soon be available on the possible
effect on
certain
species. We therefore ask the Board to investigate
this
information thoroughly before
making any
changes to the rule.
Openlands
also
believes
that,
as a general principle, the Board should not relax
water
quality
standards in the absence ofclear
and
convincing evidence
that
the
changes will not harm
any
aquatic
life
or
drinking
water supplies. We believe
that the species most sensitive to a particular pollutant should be identified for
any
proposed rule
change and that
no rule change should be allowed
that
would harm
those species.
Sincerely,
~
Richard Acker
Regional Land Use Coordinator
Printed on Recycled Paper