COMMONWEALTH EDISON,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
)
Respondent.
)
NOTICE
2j01
PCB No. 04-
(LUST Appeal
—
Ninety Day Extension)
‘~
2OO~
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
DorothyM. Gunn,
Clerk
George P. Barnes
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Exelon
—
LaSalle County Station
James R. Thompson Center
2601
North 21st Road
100 West Randolph Street
Marseilles, IL
61341-9757
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
PLEASE
TAKE NOTICE that
I
have today
filed with
the
office of the
Clerk of the
Pollution
Control Board a REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION OF APPEAL PERIOD, copies of which
are herewith served upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
John J.
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: June
10, 2004
BEFORE THE
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
RECE~VED
CLERK’S OFFICE
JUN
142004
BEFORE THE POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
STATE OF
ILUNOIS
Pollution Control Board
COMMONWEALTH EDISON,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB No. 04-
ILLiNOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
(LUST Appeal
—
Ninety Day Extension)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
-
Respondent.
)
REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION
OF APPEAL PERIOD
NOW
COMES
the Respondent, the Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency (“Illinois
EPA”), by
one ofits
attorneys, John J. Kim,
Assistant Counsel
and
Special
Assistant Attorney
General,
and,
pursuant
to
Section
40(a)( 1) of the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Act
(415
ILCS
5/40(a)(1))
and
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
105.208,
hereby requests
that
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control Board (“Board”) grant an extension ofthe thirty-five
(35)
day period for petitioning for a
hearing to September 8, 2004, or any other date not more than a total of one hundred twenty-five
(125) days from the date of service ofthe
Illinois EPA’s
final decision.
In support
thereof, the
Illinois EPA respectfully states as follows:
1.
On
May
4,
2004,
the
Illinois
EPA
issued
a
final
decision
to
the
Petitioner.
(Exhibit A)
2.
On May 21, 2004,
the Petitioner made a written request to the Illinois EPA for an
extension oftime by which to file a petition for review, asking the Illinois EPAjoin in requesting
that the Board extend the thirty-five day period for filing a petitionto ninety days.
The Petitioner
represented that the final decision was received on May 6, 2004.
(Exhibit B)
3.
The additional time requested by the parties may eliminate the need for a hearing
in this matter
or, in the alternative, allow the parties to
identify issues
and limit the scope of any
hearing that may be necessary to resolve this matter.
1
WHEREFORE,
for the reasons
stated
above,
the parties request
that
the Board,
in
the
interest of administrative
and judicial
economy, grant this request for a ninety-day extension of
the thirty-five day period for petitioning for a hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
-
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021
North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box
19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: June 10, 2004
This
filing submitted on recycled paper.
2
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
1021
NORTH
GRAND
AVENUE
EAST,
P.O.
Box
19276,
SPRINGFIELD,
ILLINOIS
62794-9276, 217-782-3397
JAMES
R.
THOMPSON
CENTER,
100
WEST RANDOLPH,
SUITE
11-300,
CHICAGO,
IL 60601, 312-814-6026
-
ROD R.
BLAGOJEVICH,
GOVERNOR
RENEE
CIPRIANO,
DIRECTOR
CERTIFIED
MAIL
7002
3150
0000
125?
3341
217/782-6762
Commonwealth Edison
2601
North 21st Road
Marseilles, IL
61341
Re:
LPC
#0990505001
—
La Salle County
Marseilles/CommonwealthEdison
2601
North 21st Road
LUST Incident No. 992477
LUST Technical File
Dear Sir/Madam:
The Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) has reviewed the Site Classification
Completion Report submitted for the above-referenced incident.
The Illinois EPA received this
report, dated December 30, 2003, on January 5, 2004.
Citations in this letter are from the
Environmental Proteátibn Act (Act) and
35 Illinois Administrative Code
(35
Iii. Adm.
Code).
The Site Classification Completion Report is rejected for the reasons listed
in Attachment A
(Section 57.7(b)(l) ofthe Act;
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 732.309(b) and 732.503(b)).
Pursuant to
35 Ill. Adm.
Code 732.301,
a Site Classification Completion Report must be
submitted within
120 days ofthe date ofthis letter to:
Please submit
all correspondence in duplicate and include the Re: block shown
at the beginning
ofthis letter.
An underground storage tank system owner or operatormay appeal this decision to the Illinois
Pollution Control Board.
Appeal rights are attaéhed.
I
ROCKFORD
—4302
North
Main
Street,
Rockford,
IL 61103— (815)
ELGIN
—
595
South State, Elgin,
IL 60123
—
(847)
608
BUREAU
OF LAND
-
PEORIA —7620 N.
University St.,
Peoria,
IL 61614 —(3
SPRINGFIELD —4500 5. Sixth Street
Rd.,
Springfield,
IL 62706
—(21
MARION
—2309W. Main
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Bureau ofLand
-
#24
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section
1021
North Grand Avenue East
Post Office Box
19276
Springfield, IL
62794-9276
EXHIBIT
A
~‘.
Harrison St., Des
Plaines,
IL
60016
—t847) 294-4000
sity St., Peoria, IL
61614— (309) 693-5463
25 South
First Street, Champaign, IL 61820 —(217) 278-5800
)9 Mall Street,
Collinsville,
IL 62234—(618)346-5120
~18)
993-7200
MAY 04 2O~
Page 2
Ifyou have any questions orneed further assistance, please contact Trent Benanti at 217/524-
4649.
Sincerely,
-
Michael T.
Lowder
Unit Manager
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section
Division ofRemediation Management
Bureau ofLand
MTL:TLB :H:\Projects\Com Ed\992477\Letter7.doc
Attachments:
Attachment A (Report Rejection Attachment)
Table
1
Appeal Rights
c:
LFR Levine-Fricke
Division File
Attachment A
Re:
LPC #099050500 1
—
La Salle County
Marseilles/Commonwealth Edison
2601 North 215t Road
LUST Incident No. 992477
LUST Technical File
1.
It appears that many ofthe acceptable detection limits were not achieved as a result of
project manager error.
Either the LFR Levine-Fricke project manager provided incorrect
detection limit information to
the laboratory or the laboratory project manager failed to
verify the reporting limits against the acceptable detection limits listed in 35
Illinois
Administrative Code Part 742 (TACO).
This is unacceptable.
2.
The Illinois EPA recognizes that dryweight corrections
may result in variances in the
sample specific reporting limits; however, the dry weight corrected reporting limit shall
not exceed the acceptable detection limit.
3.
The acceptable detection limits shall be based on the inhalation, ingestion and
soil
component of groundwater ingestion exposure pathways.
Voluntary deed restrictions are
not
allowed under Method 2 for site classification.
4.
The Site Classification Completion Report indicates that, in some instances, special
arrangements could have been made prior to analysis to
ensure that the acceptable
detection limits could have been met; however, such arrangements were not made.
This
is unacceptable.
5.
The Site Classification Completion Report indicates that the detection limits forn-
Nitrosodi-n-propylamine (0.0018 mg/kg) and hexachlorobenzene (0.00006 mgIL) are not
achievable by EPA SW-846 Method 8270C.
This is
unacceptable.
6.
The Site Classification Completion Report indicates that the detection limit for TCLP
Cadmium (0.005 mg/L) could have been achieved; however, the sample digestate was
analyzed at
lOx dilution due to matrix interference from sodium present in the TCLP
extract.
This is unacceptable.
7.
The Site Classification Completion Report indicates that the acceptable detection limits
for vinyl chloride and 1,3-dichloroprpylene could have been achieved had a 25 mL purge
been used; however, a
5
mL purge was used.
This is unacceptable.
8.
The Illinois EPA is still
concerned about detection limits (which were exceeded),
contaminants ofconcern (which were left out ofthe analyses), soil samples (which
exceeded the Tier
1 objectives) and the soil sample (which was not
collected at the depth
of greatest photo ionization detector (PD) reading above the saturated zone).
See the
attached table (Table
1) for a detailed listing ofthe Illinois EPA’s concerns.
MTL:TLB :H :\Projects\Com Ed\992477\7a.doc
Table
1
ADL
-
Acceptable Detection Limit Exceeded
NA
-
Not Analyzed
Tier I
(BG)
-
Tier I
Objective and Background Objective Exceeded
Tier I
-
Tier I
Objective Exceeded
PID
-
Not Sampled at the
Depth of Greatest
PID above the Saturated Zone
SB-4
SB-4
SB-4
SB-4
I ,3-dichloropropylene
SB-4
hexachlorobenzene
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
benzo(a)pyrene
Soil
Soil
VS-3 (1-3)
dibenzo(a.h)anthracene
Soil Boring/Well
ID
Contaminant of Concern
Media of Concern
Reason for Concern
SB-i
1,3-dichloropropylene
Soil
ADL
SB-i
hexachlorobenzene
Soil
NA
-
SB-i
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Soil
ADL
SB-I
benzo(a)pyrene
Soil
ADL
SB-I
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Soil
ADL
SB-2
1,3-dichloropropylene
Soil
ADL
SB-2
hexachlorobenzene
Soil
NA
SB-2
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Soil
ADL
SB-2
benzo(a)pyrene
Soil
ADL
SB-2
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Soil
ADL
SB-2
arsenic
Soil
Tier
1
(BG)
SB-3
I ,3-dichloropropylene
Soil
ADL
SB-3
hexachlorobenzene
Soil
NA
SB-3
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Soil
ADL
SB-3
benzo(a)pyrene
Soil
ADL
SB-3
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Soil
ADL
SB-15
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Soil
ADL
SB-i5
TCLP cadmium
Soil
ADL
Soil
Soil
ADL
NA
VS-3 (3-5)
Soil
n-Nitrosodi-n-~roovlamine
ADL
VS-b
ADL
n-Nitrosodi-n-rroovlamine
ADL
Soil
SB-5
SB-5
n-N itrosodi-n-DroDvlamine
Soil
ADL
SB-Il
n-Nitrosodi-n-~roDvlamine
TCLP
cadmium
SB-Il
Soil
ADL
Soil
n-N itrosodi-n-propylamine
Soil
ADL
TCLP cadmium
SB-12
SB-13
Soil
ADL
ADL
SB-13
Soil
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ADL
n-N
itrosodi-n-propylamine
SB-14
ADL
TCLP
cadmium
Soil
Soil
Soil
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ADL
ADL
ADL
Soil
ADL
Table
1
ADL
-
Acceptable Detection Limit Exceeded
NA
-
Not Analyzed
.
Tier I
(BG)
-
Tier I
Objective and Background Objective Exceeded
Tier I
-
Tier
1
Objective Exceeded
PID
-
Not Sampled
at the Depth of Greatest PID above the Saturated Zone
SB-S
SB-I
7
7
SB-17
SB-17
n-Nitrosodi-n-~ropvlamine
benzo(a)anthracene
SB-l7
benzo(a’rnvrene
SB-I7
ben-zo(b)fluoranthene
Soil
Soil
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
SB-18 (3-5)
Soil
indeno(i ,2,3-c,d)pyrene
SB-18 (3-5)
Soil
ADL
Tier’
SB-i8
(3-5)
Soil
Tier’
1 ,3-dichloropropylene
Soil
Tier
n-Nitrosodi-n-Droovlamine
SB-18
(14-15)
Tier
TCLP cadmium
Soil
SB-i8 (14-15)
Tier
1
Soil
Soil
1 ,3-dichloropropylene
ADL
SB-19 (4-5)
n-Nitrosodi-n-propvlamine
SB-19 (4-5)~
ADL
ADL
Soil
Soil
SB-i9 (13-15)
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
TCLP cadmium
ADL
ADL
I ,3-dichloropropylene
Soil
Soil
SB-20
(3-5)
Soil Boring/Well
ID
Contaminant of Concern
Media of Concern
Reason for Concern
SB-i 6
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Soil
ADL
SB-16
arsenic
Soil
Tier I
(BG)
SB-i6
TCLP cadmium
Soil
ADL
SB-16
all
Soil
PID
MW-4
hexachlorobenzene
Groundwater
NA
.
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
SB-20
(3-5)
SB~20
(3-5)
Soil
ADL
ADL
SB-20 (3-5)
Soil
1, 3-dichloropropylene
hexachlorobenzene
SB-20 (3-5)
ADL
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ADL
benzo(a)Dyrene
SB-20
(9-
Soil
Soil
1)
SB-20
(9-
Soil
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
I)
SB-20 (9-
Soil
ADL
NA
1)
SB-20 (9-.
I
I
1
1
Soil
I ,3-dichloropropylene
NA
)
hexachlorobenzene
SB-20 (9-’
NA
)
SB-20 (9-’
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
NA
benzo(a)pyrene
)
Soil
Soil
MW-i
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Soil
arsenic
Soil
ADL
NA
Soil
NA
MW-2
hexachlorobenzene
Soil
NA
MW-3
NA
hexachlorobenzene
Groundwater
Tier I
(BG)
hexachlorobenzene
NA
Groundwater
Groundwater
NA
NA
Table
1
Soil Boring/Well
ID
Contaminant of Concern
Media of Concern
Reason for Concern
MW-S (9/12/02)
I,3-dichloropropylene
Groundwater
AOL
MW-S (9/12/02)
vinyl chloride
.
Groundwater
ADL
-
MW-S (9/i
2/02)
hexachlorobenzene
Groundwater
ADL
MW-S
(10/30/02)
I,3-dichloropropylene
Groundwater
NA
MW-5 (10/30/02)
vinyl chloride
Groundwater
NA
MW-5 (10/30/02)
hexachloràbenzene
Groundwater
ADL
ADL
-
Acceptable Detection
Limit Exceeded
NA
-
Not Analyzed
Tier
1
(BG)
-
Tier
1
Objective and Background
Objective Exceeded
Tier
I
-
Tier I
Objective Exceeded
PID
-
Not Sampled at the Depth of Greatest PID above the Saturated Zone
Appeal Rights
An underground storage tank owner or operator may appeal
this final decision to the Illinois
Pollution Control Board pursuant to
Sections 40
and 57.7(c)(4)(D) ofthe Act by filing
a petition
for a hearing within 35
days afterthe date ofissuance of the final decision;
however, the 35-day
period may be extended for a period oftime not to exceed 90 days by written notice from the
owner or operator and the Illinois EPA within the initial
35-day appeal period.
Ifthe owner or
operator wishes to receive a 90-day extension, a written request that includes a statement ofthe
date the final decision was received, along with a copy ofthis
decision, must
be sent to the
Illinois EPA as soon as possible.
For information regarding the filing ofan appeal, please contact:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
State of Illinois Center
100 West Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL
60601
312/814-3620
For information regarding the filing of an extension, please contact:
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Post Office Box
19276
Springfield, IL
62794-9276
217/782-5544
Exekn5.
Exelon Generation
Company,
LLC
www.exeloncorp.com
Nuci
ear
LaSalle County Station
2601 North
21~
Road
.
Marseilles, IL 61341—9757
May 21,
2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN
RECEIPT REQUESTED
.)
~
~,
~
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
,,
~
~
Division ofLegal Counsel
~
3
~
1021 North Grand Avenue East
~
~..
r~
-
Post Office Box
19276
.~2.~
Springfield,
IL
62794-9276
CD
Re:
LPC #0990505001
-
LaSalle
County
Marseilles/Commonwealth Edison
2601 North 21st
Road
LUST Incident No. 992477
LUST Technical File
-
Dear Sir or Madam:
A copy ofIllinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s (Agency) letter dated May 4, 2004
rejecting the Site Classification
Completion Report for the subject matter is attached.
The letter
was received on May 6,
2004.
The purpose ofthis letter is to request a 90-day
extension ofthe time in
which to file an appeal
with
the Illinois
Pollution Control Board.
Our consultant
is currently reviewing the issues
that have been identified by the Agency.
Additional time is required to prepare a response and schedule a meeting with the Agency
to
attempt
to resolve this.
If additional information is required, please contact Mr. Frederic B’evington, Environmental
Specialist, at 815-415-3243.
Sincerely,
George
P.
Barnes
Site Vice-President
Exelon
-
LaSalle County Station
cc:
Michael T Lowder
Unit Manager
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section
Division of Remediation Management
Bureau of Land
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned attorney at law, hereby certify that on June
10, 2004, I served true and
correct
copies of a
REQUEST
FOR NINETY
DAY
EXTENSION
OF
APPEAL
PERIOD, by
placing
true and
correct
copies in
properly
sealed
and
addressed
envelopes and
by
depositing
said sealed envelopes in
a U.S. mail drop box located within Sprhigfield, Illinois, with sufficient
First Class Mail postage affixed thereto, upon the following named persons:
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
George P. Barnes
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Exelon
—
LaSalle County Station
James R. Thompson Center
2601
North 21st Road
100 West Randolph Street
Marseilles, IL
61341-9757
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY,
-
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box
19276
Springfield, Illinois
62794-9276
217/782-5544
.
217/782-9143 (TDD)