1. CLERK’S OFFICE
    2. Pollution Control Soarc~
      1. I. Proposed Adjusted Standard—35 III. Adm. Code 104.406(f)
      2. IV. Conclusion
      3. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CLERK’S OFFICE
JUN
IJ 72004
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Soarc~
BEFORE THE ILLiNOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PETITION BY HAYDEN
)
WRECKING CORPORATION
)
FOR AN ADJUSTED
)
DocketNo.:
AS 04-003
STANDARD FROM
)
35
ILL, ADM. CODE
§
620.410(a)
)
RESPONSE TO IEPA RECOMMENDATION
TO PETITION FOR ADJUSTED STANDARD
COMES NOW, Hayden Wrecking Corporation (“Hayden”), through its
undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Section 28.1
of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act
(the “Act”), 415 ILCS
5/28.1,
and 35
Ill. Adm. Code 104.416(d), files this Response to the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s (“JEPA”) Recommendation to Hayden’s Petition for
Adjusted Standard.
The JEPA recommends that the Illinois Pollution Control Board (“Board”)
grantHayden an Adjusted Standard from the
Class I groundwater standards for four inorganic
chemicals codified at 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 620.410(a), subject to two conditions:
(1) clarification
ofthe specific regulations that the Petition and Adjusted Standard address, and (2) clarification
that the revised standards
apply exclusivelyto
Hayden’s facility.
See Recommendation, p.6.
Hayden has no objection to these conditions and responds as follows:
I.
Proposed Adjusted Standard—35
III.
Adm. Code 104.406(f)
The IEPA’s proposed conditions relate to 35
Ill. Adm.
Code 104.406(f), which
requires a Petition for Adjusted Standard to include both a narrative description ofthe proposed
adjusted standard and proposed language for a Board order imposing the standard.
Hayden has no objection to clarifying this and proposes to revise the Class I
groundwater standards for arsenic, iron,
lead and manganese only at its
former landfill sites as
follows:

620.4 10 Groundwater Quality Standards for Class
I: Potable Resource Groundwater
a)
Inorganic Chemical Constituents:
Except due to natural causes or as provided in Section
620.450,
concentrations ofthe following chemical constituents must not be exceeded in Class
I
groundwater
(those limitations marked with an
*
shall apply only to Hayden Wrecking
Corporation’s former landfill sites located near the intersection ofIllinois Route 203 and
Interstate
55/70
in Madison, St. Clair County, Illinois):
Constituent
Units
Standard
Antimony
mg/L
0.006
Arsenic
mg/L
0.05
(* 0.082)
Barium
mg/L
2.0
Beryllium
mg/L
0.004
Boron
mg/L
2.0
Cadmium
mg/L
0.005
Chloride
mg/L
200.0
Chromium
mg/L
0.1
Cobalt
mg/L
1.0
Copper
mg/L
0.65
Cyanide
mg/L
0.2
Fluoride
mg/L
4.0
hon
mg/L
5.0
(*
735)
Lead
mg/L
0.0075 (* 0.220)
Manganese
mg/L
0.15 (*24.2)
Mercury
mg/L
0.002
Nickel
mg/L
0.1
Nitrate as N
mg/L
10.0
Radium-226
pCi/i
20.0
Radium-228
pCi/l
20.0
Selenium
mg/L
0.05
Silver
mg/L
0.05
Sulfate
mg/L
400.0
Thallium
mg/L
0.002
Total Dissolved
Solids (TDS)
mg/L
1,200
Zinc
mg/L
5.0
The IEPA also points out that Hayden does not detail the costs associated with
achieving the Adjusted Standard, as required by
35 Ill. Adm. Code
104.406(f).
It will not cost
Hayden to comply with the Adjusted
Standard.
As stated in the Petition and recognized by the
JEPA, the requested alternate limits are based on the highest concentrations for each inorganic
715289.2
2
THIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

constituent previously found at Hayden’s former landfill sites.
As such, there are no
additional
efforts necessary and there are no corresponding costs associated with achieving the Adjusted
Standard.
II.
Compliance Alternatives
—35
Ill. Adm.
Code 104.406(e)
In addition to recommending the conditions mentioned above, the IEPA also
notes that 35
Ill. Adm.
Code 104.406(e) requires Hayden to describe the efforts which would be
necessary for Hayden
to comply with 35 Ill. Adm. Code
620.410(a), the regulation of general
applicability, and also requires a list ofthe compliance alternatives with corresponding costs.
Though the Petition lacks this information, the IEPA states this does not affect its decision to
recommend that the Board
grantHayden’s Adjusted Standard.
Hayden’s compliance options, other than pursuing this Adjusted Standard, are:
(1)
Hayden may attempt to locate the source ofthe exceeded levels of the inorganic constituents
and proceed with a judicial/administrative action to force the source to remediate both its on and
off-site constituents, or (2)
Hayden may attempt to
convince the IEPA/U. S. EPA to become
involved to force the source to
remediate the on
and off-site constituents.
The corresponding
costs and time frame associated with either option are unquantifiable, speculative, and
prohibitive (especially if litigation and/or stateresource costs are factored in).
In addition, there
is no guarantee that the source will be able to remediate the constituents to
the groundwater
quality standards enumerated in 35
Ill. Adm. Code 620.410(a).
The former landfill sites are now a paved parking lot for the Gateway
International Raceway, which is a source ofrevenue for St.
Clair County.
Either compliance
option described above would likely also
involve groundwater sampling and monitoring which
715289.2
3
THIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

could disrupt the transportation and parking structure ofthe Raceway and would be cost-
prohibitive.
III.
Impact on the Environment
35 Iii.
Adm. Code 104.406(g)
Finally, the JEPA notes that Hayden’s Petition does not discuss the impact ofits
activity on the environment should it comply with the regulation ofgeneral applicability, versus
the environmental impact if the Board approves the proposed Adjusted Standard.
The IEPA
points out that this omission is immaterial to its Recommendation to Grant the Adjusted
Standard.
The environmental impact ofcomplying with the Adjusted Standard is
the same
as, ifnot less than, the impact ofcomplying with the current groundwater standards.
The former
landfill sites have been closed since
1992 and have been graded and covered with limestone
since 1999.
Visitors to the Gateway International Raceway currently use the sites as a parking
lot.
Though no detrimental effect ofnoncompliance with applicable groundwater standards has
been shown, Haydenhas taken additional steps to ensure that complying with the Adjusted
Standard will not affect the environment.
As set forth in the Petition, Hayden will establish an
Environmental Land Use Control on the sites, and Hayden has enacted a groundwater ordinance
with the City ofMadison.
Both steps will
prohibit the potable use ofthe
site’s groundwater.
IV.
Conclusion
Hayden requests an Adjusted Standard from the requirements of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 60.4 10(a) for arsenic, iron, lead, and manganese that will apply only to Hayden’s former
landfill sites in Madison, St. Clair County, Illinois.
The IEPA recommends that the Board grant
Hayden’s Petition,
subject to two conditions.
Hayden does not oppose these conditions and
715289.2
4
THIS FILING SUBMITFED ON RECYCLED PAPER

respectfully requests that the Board adopt Hayden’s proposed Adjusted Standard as soon as
possible.
Dated: June3,2004
Respectfully submitted,
GREENSFELDER, HEMKER, & GALE, P.C.
By
~
Donald E. Weihl
(#
2960672)
Christina L. Archer (#
6215708)
Anna C. Smith
(#
6279428)
10 South Broadway, Suite 2000
St. Louis,
Missouri 63102
Phone: (314) 241-9090
Fax: (314) 241-4245
Attorneys for Hayden Wrecking Corp.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy ofHayden’s Response to IEPA Recommendation to
Petition forAdjusted Standard was deposited in an envelope with postage fully prepaid, and that
said envelope was deposited in a U.S. Post Officemailbox
in St. Louis, Missouri, on the ~~day
ofJune, 2004,
addressed to the following persons:
DorothyM. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Kyle NashDavis, Esq.
Assistant Counsel
Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency, Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P0 Box
1976
Springfield, Illinois
62794-9276
715289.2
5
THIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

Back to top