1. BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      2. OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
      3. NOTICE
      4. OF APPEAL PERIOD
      5. CERTIFIED MAIL
      6. EXHIBIT
      7. SECTION 1
      8. Carmi/Aylsworth Oil Company905 East Main Street
      9. LUST Incident No. 982746
      10. EBITI
  1. RECEIVED
  2. Agency
      1. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
AYLSWORTH OIL COMPANY,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
flhinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
Petitioner,
Respondent.
)
)
V.
CLERK~SOFFICE
MAY
242004
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
PO1IUtjO~Control Board
)
PCB No. 04-
)
(LUST Appeal
Ninety Day Extension)
)
)
NOTICE
Holly Hurt, Project Manager
United Science Industries
P.O. Box 360
6295 East flhinois Highway 15
Woodlawn, IL 62898-0360
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the office of the Clerk of the Pollution
Control Board a REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION OF APPEAL PERIOD, copies of which
are herewith served upon you.
-
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
ant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: May 20, 2004

RECE~VED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
MAY 242004
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution
STATE OF
Control
ILLINOIS
Board
AYLSWORTH OIL COMPANY,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB No. 04-
ILLiNOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
(LUST Appeal
Ninety Day Extension)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
)
REQUEST
FOR
NINETY
DAY EXTENSION
OF APPEAL PERIOD
NOW COMES the Respondent, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois
EPA”), by one of its attorneys, John J. Kim, Assistant Counsel and Special Assistant Attorney
General, and, pursuant to Section 40(a)(1) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (415
ILCS
5/40(a)(1))
and
35
Ill. Adm. Code 105.208, hereby requests that the Illinois Pollution
Control Board (“Board”) grant an extension ofthe thirty-five
(35)
day period for petitioning for a
hearing to August 18, 2004, or any other date not more than a total of one hundred twenty-five
(125) days from the date ofthe illinois EPA’s final decision. In support thereof, the Illinois EPA
respectfully states as follows:
1.
On April
15,
2004, the Illinois EPA issued a final decision to the Petitioner.
(Exhibit A)
2.
On April 28, 2004, the Petitioner made a written request to the Illinois EPA for an
extension oftime by which to file a petition forreview, asking the Illinois EPA join in requesting
that the Board extend the thirty-five day period for filing a petition to ninety days. The Petitioner
did not represent when the final decision was received. (Exhibit B)
3.
The additional time requested by the parties may eliminate the need for a hearing
in this matter or, in the alternative, allow the parties to identify issues and limit the scope of any
hearing that maybe necessary to resolve this matter.
1

WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, the parties request that the Board, in the
interest of administrative and judicial economy, grant this request for a ninety-day extension of
the thirty-five day period forpetitioning for a hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent
~Th
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: May 20, 2004
This filing submitted on recycled paper.
2

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1021 NORTH GRAND AVENUE EAST, P.O. Box 19276, SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794-9276, 21 7-782-3397
JAMES R. THOMPSON CENTER, 100 WEST RANDOLPH, SUITE 11-300, CHICAGO, IL 60601, 312-814-6026
ROD R.
BLACOJEVICH, GOVERNOR
RENEE CIPRIANO, DIRECTOR
217/782-6762
APR t5 20fl4
Aylsworth Oil Company
Attention: Mr. Joseph Aylsworth
905
East Mail Street
Carmi, Illinois 62821
Re:
LPC # 1930105033
--
White
Aylsworth Oil Company
905 East Main Street
LUST Incident #982746
LUST Technical File
Dear Mr. Aylsworth:
CERTIFIED MAIL
7001 2510 0002 52&0 7291
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) has reviewed the High Priority
Corrective Action Plan (plan) submitted for the above-referenced incident. This plan, dated
December 12, 2003, was received by the Illinois EPA on December
15,
2003. In addition, a
report containing gr 9undwater sampling data dated February 13, 2004 and received by Illinois
EPA on February 19, 2004, was reviewed. Citations in this letter are from the Environmental
Protection Act (Act) and 35 Illinois Administrative Code
(35
Ill. Adm. Code).
Pursuant to Section
57.7(c)(4)
ofthe Act and 35 Iii. Adm. Code 732.405(c), the plan is modified.
The following modifications are necessary, in addition to those provisions already outlined in the
plan, to demonstrate compliance with Title XVI ofthe Act and 35 Iii. Adm. Code 732:
1.
Due to the soil and groundwater sampling results from the area identified as RIDES Mass
Transit, as well as MW-l/SCB, and as well as the’~groundwatergradient, it appears as
though soil and groundwater contamination from this area is from a currently unidentified
on-site source. Therefore, future investigation work in the area identified as RIDES Mass
Transit, as well as any corrective action on this property, will not be considered eligible
from the UST fund unless this release is from a tank eligible for reimbursement in RIDES
Mass Transit area. Investigation work to date will be considered reimbursable from the
LUST fund.
ROCKFORD
—4302 North Main Street, Rockford, IL 61103 —(815)9
ELGIN —595 South State, Elgin, IL 60123
— (847)
608-
BUREAU OF LAND
-
PEORIA
— 7620 N. University St., Peoria, IL 61614 —
(3
SPRINGFIELD
—4500 5. Sixth Street Rd., Springfield, IL 62706 —
(21
b
MARION
2309 W. Main
EXHIBIT
W. Harrison St., Des Plaines, IL 60016— (847) 294-4000
sity St., Peoria, II 61614— (309) 693-5463
25 South First Street, Champaign, IL 61820— (217) 278-5800
9 MalI Street, Collinsville, IL 62234 —(618)346-5120
18) 993-7200

Page 2
2.
Regarding the proposed 6” concrete engineered barrier, the existing concrete and asphalt
appears to be a sufficient engineered barrier under 35 IAC 742.1100 (Engineered
Barriers), thus the proposal to replace this concrete and asphalt is denied.
A-demonstration may be made as to why the existing concrete and asphalt is insufficient
as an engineered barrier, but any approved engineered barrier would be a cap on top of
the existing asphalt. Costs associated with upgrades to the asphalt / concrete above the
cost to cap the existing asphalt / concrete would not be eligible for reimbursement from
the LUST fund.
3.
At this time, proposed groundwater monitoring well MW-20 should not be advanced;
Both groundwater modeling and MW-19 demonstrate that groundwater contamination
would not migrate to the opposite side ofthe railroad property.
Please note that all activities associated with the remediation of this release proposed in the plan
must be executed in accordance with all applicable regulatory and statutory requirements,
including compliance with the proper permits.
-
In addition, the budget for the High Priority Corrective Action Plan is modified pursuant to
Section
57.7(c)(4)
ofthe Act and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.405(c). Based on the modifications
listed in Section 2 ofAttachment A, the amounts listed in Section 1 ofAttachment A are
approved. Please note that the costs must be incurred in accordance with the approved plan. Be
aware that the amount ofreimbursement may be limited by Sections
57.8(e),
57.8(g) and
57.8(d)
ofthe Act, as well as 35111. Adm. Code 732.604, 732.606(s), and 732.611. This budget includes
costs for completed activities, as well as the preparation ofthe off-site ELUCs and HAA and the
eventual CACR. Costs associated with the engineered barriers and proposed groundwater
monitoring well MW-20 have not been approved.
NOTE: Amended plans andlor budgets must be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of
a No Further Remediation (NFR) Letter. Costs associated with a plan orbudget that have not
been approved prior to the issuance of an NFR Letter will not be reimbursable.
All future correspondence must be submitted to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Bureau ofLand
-
#24
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Post Office Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276

•r
Page3
-
Please submit all correspondence in duplicate and include the Re: block shown at the beginning
of this letter.
An underground storage tank system owner or operator may appeal this decision to the Illinois
Pol1uti~inControl Board. Appeal rights are attached.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact Michael A. Heaton at
217/524-3312.
Sincerely,
•~
Michael T. Lowder
Unit Manager
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section
Division ofRemediation Management
Bureau ofLand
MTL:mh\982746f2.doc
Attachment
cc:
Ms. Holly Hurt
--
United Science Industries (Woodlawn, Illinois)
Division File

Attachment A
Re:
LPC # 1930105033
--
White
Alysworth Oil Company
905 East Main Street
LUST Incident #982746
LUST Technical FileS
Citations in this attachment are from the Environmental Protection Act (Act) and 35 Illinois
Administrative Code
(35
Ill. Adm. Code).
SECTION 1
As a result ofthe Illinois EPA’s modifications in Section 2 ofthis Attachment A, the following
amounts are approved:
$13,747.55
Investigation Costs
$4,585.00
Analysis Costs
$29,520.00
Personnel Costs
$1,912.50
Equipment Costs
$3,959.60
Field Purchases and Other Costs
-
~
Handling Charges
~4”S3’,7~
~“~‘
SECTION 2
$2,087.05
for Investigation Costs. These costs are for activities in excess of those
necessary to meet the minimum requirements of Title XVI ofthe Act (Section
57.5(a)
of
the Act) and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732 (Section
732.505(c)).
Costs for corrective action
activities and associated materials or services exceeding the minimum requirements
necessary to comply with the Act are not eligible for payment from the Fund
(35
Ill.
Adm. Code 732.606(o)). In addition, these costs are not corrective action costs.
“Corrective action” means an activity associated with compliance with the provisions of
Sections 57.6 and 57.7 of the Act (Section 57.2 ofthe Act and 35 Ill. Adm. Code
732.103). One ofthe eligibility requirements for accessing the Fund is that costs are
associated with “corrective action.” (Section
57.9(a)(7)
ofthe Act)
Specifically, the proposed work associated with MW-20 has been eliminated from the
subject budget. This includes:
-
OneGloves,mobilization:camera,
visqueen,$250
Geoprobe, and headspace analysis containers:
$1,519.85
Well materials associated with MW-20: $317.20.
2.
$266.00 for an adjustment in Investigation Costs. Such costs are not consistent with the.
requirement for a line item estimate. The budget must include a line item estimate ofall
costs associated with the development, implementation, and completion ofthe applicable

Attachment A
Page 2
activities
(35
Ill. Adm. Code 732.405(b)). The budget fails to include such line item
estimate.
Specifically, the rate for Drilling Costs has been reduced to $23 / foot, from $24 / foot.
266 feet were drilled, 266
*
$1/foot
=
$266.
3.
$130.00 forAnalysis Costs. These costs are for activities in excess ofthose necessary to
meet the minimum requirements ofTitle XVI of the Act (Section
57.5(a)
ofthe Act) and
35 Ill. Adm. Code 732 (Section
732.505(c)).
Costs for corrective action activities and
associated materials or services exceeding the minimum requirements necessary to
comply with the Act are not eligible for payment from the Fund
(35
Ill. Adm. Code
732.606(o)). In addition, these costs are not corrective action costs. “Corrective action”
means an activity associated with compliance with the provisions ofSections 57.6 and
5~77ofthe Act (Section 57.2 of the Act and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.103). One ofthe
eligibility requirements for accessing the Fund is that costs are associated with
“corrective action.” (Section
57.9(a)(7)
of the Act)
Specifically, the two groundwater samples associated with proposed groundwater
monitoring well MW-20 have been eliminated. 2 samples
@
$65
/ sample
=
$130.
4.
$20,521.50 for an adjustment in Personnel Costs. The Illinois EPA has determined that
these costs are not reasonable as submitted (Section
57.7(c)(4)(C)
ofthe Act and 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 732.606(hh)). One ofthe overall goals ofthe financial review is to assure
that costs associated with materials, activities, and services are reasonable (35 Ill. Adm.
Code
732.505(c)).
Please note that additional information and/or supporting
documentation maybe provided to demonstrate the costs are reasonable.
Please note that work associated with groundwater monitoring well abandonmenthas
been moved to “Other Costs”.
5.
$540.00 for an adjustment in Equipment Costs. The Illinois EPA has determined that
these costs are not reasonable as submitted (Section 57.7(c)(4)(C) ofthe Act and 35 III.
Adm. COde 732.606(hh)). One ofthe overall goals ofthe financial review is to assure
that costs associated with materials, activities, and~services are reasonable (35 Ill. Adm.
Code 732.505(c)). Please note that additional information and/or supporting
documentation may be provided to demonstrate the costs are reasonable.
Specifically, 10 days have been allotted to the Env. Utility Vehicle at $60! day, thus all
other vehicles have been eliminated. This includes the service truck with tools ($420), 5-
ton utility trailer
($45),
S/M utility vehicle ($30), and the drill rig utility trailer
($45).

Attachment A
Page 3
6.
$475.00 for an adjustment in Equipment Costs. Such costs are not consistent with the
requirement for a line item estimate. The budget must include a line item estimate ofall
costs associated with the development, implementation, and completion of the applicable
activities
(35
III. Adm. Code 732.405(b)). The budget fails to include such line item
estimate.
The proposed work, which appears to be associated with the construction ofproposed
groundwater monitoring well MW-20, has been eliminated.
7.
$64,020.80 for an adjustment in Field Purchases and Other Costs. The Illinois EPA has
determined that these costs are not reasonable as submitted (Section
57.7(c)(4)(C)
ofthe
Act and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.606(hh)). One ofthe overall goals ofthe financial review
is to assure that costs associated with materials, activities, and services are reasonable
(35
Ill. Adm. Code
732.505(c)).
Please note that additional information and/or supporting
documentation may be provided to demonstrate the costs are reasonable.
Specifically, $100 has been deducted from Shipping Costs, $1,185 has been deducted
from well abandonment costs (the remaining $3,815 includes Personnel costs), and
$62,280.00 has been deducted from concrete engineered barrier costs. In addition,
$455.80
was deducted for costs associated with “Carmi Light and Water”. It is unclear
what this charge was for, further information for this charge may be provided in a future
submittal. If these charges were associated with water disposal, the volume ofwater
disposed will need to be provided.
8.
$66.70 for an adjustment in handling charges. Handling charges are eligible for payment
only if they are equal to or less than the amount determined by the following table
(Section
57.8(g)
ofthe Act and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.607):
Subcontract or Field
Eligible Handling Charges as a
Purchase Cost:
Percentage ofCost:
$0-$5,000
12
$5,001
-
$15,000
$600 plus 10 ofamount over $5,000
$15,001
-
$50,000
$1,600 plus ~ ofamount over $15,000
$50,001
-
$100,000
.
$4,400 plus
5
ofamount over $50,000
$100,001
-
$1,000,000
$6,900 plus 2 ofamount over $100,000
As a result ofthe reduction in sampling shipping from $200 to $100, and the elimination
of$455.80 for Carmi Light and Power, the remaining amount eligible for reimbursement
is $164.60.
MTL:mh\982746a2.doc

Appeal Rights
An underground storage tank owner or operator may appeal this final decision to the Illinois
Pollution Control Board pursuant to Sections 40 and 57.7(c)(4)(D) ofthe Act by filing a petition
for a hearing within 35 days after the date ofissuance ofthe final decision. However, the 35-day
period may be extended for a period oftime not to exceed 90 days by written notice from the
owner or operator and the Illinois EPA within the initial 35-day appeal period. Ifthe owner or
operator wishes to receive a 90-day extension, a written request that includes a statement ofthe
date the final decision was received, along with a copy ofthis decision, must be sent to the
Illinois EPA as soon as possible.
For information regarding the filing ofan appeal, please contact:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
• State of Illinois Center
100 West Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
312/814-3620
For information regarding the filing ofan extension, please contact:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Post Office Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
217/782-5544
4

P.O. Box
360
6295 East Illinois Highway 15
Woodlawn, Illinois 62898-0360
April 28, 2004
Phone: (618) 735—2411
Fax: (618) 735-2907
E-Mail: unitedscience@ unitedsciencecom
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Springfield, IL 62792-9276
Attn:
John Kim
Re:
LPC# 1930105033--White Co.
Carmi/Aylsworth Oil Company
905 East Main Street
LUST Incident No. 982746
Dear
Mr.
Kim,
United Science Industries, Inc. (USI), on behalf of our client, Aylsworth Oil
Company, is requesting a 90-day extension to the 35-day appeal period in
regards to the IEPA correspondence included.
I appreciate your time and consideration in this matter.
If you have any
questions or comments regarding this matter please contact me at (618) 735-
2411 ext. 192.
Sincerely yours,
UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Holly Hurt
Project Manager
Enclosures
J4LL~f~oth~
HH:bg
EBITI

Back to top


RECEIVED
DI~l~j
of
0~
Legal~
APR 30 2004
~nvironmentaiProtection

Back to top


Agency
UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned attorney at law, hereby certify that on May 20, 2004, I served true and
correct copies of a REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION OF APPEAL PERIOD, by
placing true and correct copies in properly sealed and addressed envelopes and by depositing
said sealed envelopes in a U.S. mail drop box located within Springfield, Illinois, with sufficient
First Class Mail postage affixed thereto, upon the following named persons:
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Holly Hurt, Project Manager
Illinois Pollution Control Board
United Science Industries
James R. Thompson Center
P.O. Box 360
100 West Randolph Street
6295
East Illinois Highway 15
Suite 11-500
Woodlawn, IL 62898-0360
Chicago, IL 60601
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
John(J-~Kim
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)

Back to top