RECEIVED
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARELERKS OFFICE
iN THE MATTER OF:
)
PETITION OF CR0WNLINE BOATS, INC.
FOR AN ADJUSTED STANDARD FROM
35
ILL. ADM. CODE 215.301
)
MAY
172004
TO:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R.
Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Dale A. Guariglia
Bryan Cave, LLP
One Metropolitan Square
211
North Broadway, Suite 3600
St. Louis, MO 63 102-2750
Carol Sudman, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box
19274
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9274
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have filed with the Office ofthe Pollution
Control Board the RESPONDENT’S POST-HEARING BRIEF on behalf ofthe Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, a copy ofwhich is herewith served upon you.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTIONAGENCY
By:
Charles E. Matoesian
Assistant Counsel
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O.Box 19276
Spring field, IL 62794-9276
217/782-5544
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON
RECYCLED PAPER
)
)
)
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Board
AS
04-01
(ADJUSTED STANDARD
—
AIR)
NOTICE
Date:
May 14, 2004
RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLiNOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
MAY
172004
iN THE MATTER OF:
)
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
Pollution Control Board
PETITION OF CROWNLINE BOATS, INC.
)
AS 04-01
FOR AN ADJUSTED STANDARD FROM
)
(Adjusted Standard-Air)
35 ILL. ADM. CODE 215.301
)
)
RESPONDENT’S
POST-HEARING BRIEF
NOW COMES the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois EPA” or
“Agency”) by its attorney,
Charles B. Matoesian, and hereby submits its Post-Hearing
Briefwith the Illinois Pollution Control Board (“Board”) in this matter.
In support ofthis
Post-Hearing Brief, the Illinois EPA states as follows:
1.
Crownline, Inc.
(“Crownline”) filed its Petition for Adjusted Standard (“Petition”)
on
December 4,
2003, pursuant
to
Section
28.1
of the Illinois
Environmental Protection
Act
(“Act”),
415
ILCS
5/28.1,
and
the
regulations of the Board
at
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
Section
104.402.
The
Petition
requests
that
the
Board
grant
Crownline
an
adjusted
standard
from
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
Section
215.301,
the Use
of Organic Material Rule,
better
known
as
the
“8
lb/hr
Rule”
as
it
applies
to
the
emissions
of volatile
organic
material (“VOM”) from Crownline’s West Frankfort, Illinois, boat manufacturing facility.
2.
On
February
5th,
2004,
the
Board
found
that
the
Crownline
petition met
the
requirements of35
Ill. Adm.
Code Section 104.406 and accepted the matter for hearing.
3.
On or about January 20th, 2004, the Illinois EPA filed its recommendation with the
Board recommending that the Board GRANT the Petition for Adjusted Standard.
1
4.
A hearing was held on this matter on April 23rd, 2004.
Testimony was presented by Mr.
Dale Guariglia, Mr. James Claxton and Mr. Andy Polcyn for Petitioner.
Certain questions were
posed by Ms. Alisa Liu ofthe Board’s technical staff.
The Hearing Officer, Ms. Carol Sudman,
determined that the questions should be addressed by the parties
in theirpost-hearing briefs.
See
Transcript p. 42, Lines 7
-
21.
5.
The questions were primarily directed at clarifying points
in the Petitioner’s Brief.
This
reply is concerned solelywith the few questions addressed to the Illinois EPA.
6.
On page 40 ofthe Transcript, lines 19 through 21, Ms.
Liu asks Mr. Matoesian
“in
theirtestimony, Crownline indicated that the Agency was agreeable to its revised
wording for the adjusted standard.
Do you support that that?”
The Illinois EPA states in
elaboration ofits
answer at hearing that the Agency has come to an agreement with the
Petitioner over the wording ofthe Adjusted
Standard and supports the granting ofthe
Adjusted Standard based on the language submitted
at hearingby the Petitioner.
This
language has been added to
Crownline Boats, Inc.
Post Hearing Response
at Exhibit B.
7.
On page 41 ofthe Transcript, lines
1
through 6, Ms. Liu asks if the Illinois EPA
has any additional information concerning the 8 lb/hr rule that it would like to add to
“what Crownline interpreted.”
The Illinois EPA agrees with Crownline when it states
that when the Board enacted the
8 lb/hr rule the Board did not, and could not, have
anticipated Crownline’s particular situation especially when the newer emissions factors
established by the U.S.
EPA are considered.
8.
As the schedule for filing the Post-Hearing Briefs was concurrent, the Illinois
EPA reserves the right to provide
additional answers and clarifications should the
2
Petitioner’s Post-Hearing Briefcontain matter found objectionable or requiring
clarification.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated herein, the Illinois
EPA recommends that
Crownline’s Petition for an Adjusted Standard be granted.
Respectfully Submitted,
ILLINOIS EVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
~
Charles B. Matoesian
Assistant Counsel
Division ofLegal Counsel
DATED:
May 14, 2004
1021 N. Grand Ave. East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois
62794-9276
(2 17) 782-5544
3
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF SANGAMON
PROOF OF
SERVICE
I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached Respondent’s Post-
Hearing Briefupon the person to whom
it is
directed, by placing it in an envelope addressed to:
TO:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Dale A. Guariglia
Bryan Cave, LLP
One Metropolitan Square
211
North Broadway, Suite 3600
St.
Louis, MO 63102-2750
Carol Sudman, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
1021
North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box
19274
Springfield, Illinois
62794-9274
and mailing it by First Class Mail from Springfield, Illinois on May 14, 2004, with sufficient
postage affixed.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
this
14th
day ofMay, 2004
Notary Public
OFFICIAL
SEAL
:ç
BRENDA
BOEHNER
NOTARY
PUBLIC,
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS ~
~:MYCOMMISSION
EXPIRES
11.14.2005?.
)
)SS.
)
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER