+
SPRINGFH~LDOFFICE
1021 North Grand Ave. East
P.O. Box 19274
Springfield.IL
62794-9274
217-524-8500
FAX 217-524-8508
6
CHICAGO OFFICE
James R. Thompson Cente~
100 West Randoiph
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
312-814-3620
FAX
312-814-3669
TYY
312-814-6032
+
WEB
SITE
www.ipcb.ctate iLus
PRINIFf~U”~
~
~-1)
May 11,2004
©~U~
~~i~L
ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
MAY
132004
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution
Control Board
Jack Lavin, Director
Department ofCommerce and Economic Opportunity
620 East Adams Street, S-6
Springfield, Illinois 62704
Re:
Request for Economic Impact Study for:
Proposed Amendments to
Dissolved Oxygen Standard
35
III. Adm. Code
302.206
(R04-25)
Dear Director Lavin:
The Pollution Control Board (Board) received a rulemaking proposal on
April
19, 2004,
filed by the Illinois Association ofWastewater Agencies (IAWA).
The proposal seeks to
amend the Board’s general use water quality regulations that
establish
standards for levels ofdissolved oxygen.
The Board accepted the proposal
for hearing on
May 6, 2004.
1 am writing to request that you determine whether your
Department will conduct an economic impact study concerning this proposal.
Since 1998,
Section 27 (b) ofthe Environmental Protection Act has required
the Board to:
1)
“request that the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity
(formerly the Department ofCommerce and Community Affairs) conduct a
study of the economic impact ofthe proposed rules.
The Department may
within 30 to
45 days ofsuch request produce a study ofthe economic impact
ofthe proposed rules.
At
a minimum, the economic impact study shall
address
a) economic, environmental, and public health benefits that may be
achieved through compliance with
the proposed rules, b) the effects ofthe
proposed rules on employment levels, commercial productivity, the economic
growth of small businesses with
100 or less employees, and the State’s
overall
economy, and c).the cost per unit ofpollution reduced and the
variability ofcompany revenues expected to be used to implement the
proposed rules; and
(2)
conduct at least one public hearing on the economic impact ofthose
rules.
At least 20 days before the hearing, the Board shall notify the public of
the hearing and make the economic impact study, or the Department of
Commerce and Economic Opportunity’s explanation for not producing an
economic impact study, available to the public.
Such public hearing maybe
held simultaneously or as a part ofany Board hearing considering such new
rules.”
415
ILCS
5/27(b)
(2002).
The Board is scheduling hearing dates forthis rulemaking proposal.
I would
greatly appreciate
a response from
you concerning DCEO’s position on whether it
will perform the economic impact study as soon as is possible.
The Board appreciates DCEO’s recent timely and considered response to
similar requests we have made concerning other pending rulemakings.
The Board
appreciates that fiscal constraints may prevent DCEO from conducting economic
studies in
everyrulemaking.
But, as I have pointed out before, a review ofBoard
rulemaking opinions and orders since then would reveal that the Department’s
decision not to perform economic impact studies has not been questioned at any
Board hearing.
If I, or my staff, can provide you with any additional information, please let
me know.
While the Board can proceed to hold hearings while awaiting your
decision, the Environmental Protection Act does not allow the Board to complete its
rulemaking process without your Department’s
input.
Thank you for your early response.
Sincerely,
~.
1~hilip
Nov k
~l1airman,Pollution
Control Board
Cc:
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Em
Conley, Rules
Coordinator