ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

1N THE MATTER OF:

)

)

AS 04-01

PETITION OF CR0WNLINE BOATS,

iNC.

)

(Adjusted Standard)

FOR AN ADJUSTED

STANDARD FROM

35)

ILL.

ADM. CODE 215.301

)

RESPONSES

OF CR0WNLINE BOATS, INC.

TO QUESTIONS

IN HEARING

OFFICER

ORDER

OF

APRIL 6, 2004

To

facilitate the Board’s decision on this adjusted standard, the hearing officer issued an

Order, dated April 6, 2004, which set forth several questions which the Petitioner should be

prepared to

answer at the hearing set forApril 23, 2004.

Petitioner has prepared the following

responses to the questions set forth in the April 6, 2004 Order.

For convenience, Petitioner has

also

set forth below the questions from the April

6, 2004 Order with Petitioner’s response (in

italics) to

each question immediately following

AS 2004-1

Crownline Boat, Inc.

35 IAC 104.406

(e)

1.

In the Federal Register, USEPA estimates there are approximately

119 existing facilities

that will be subject to the Federal rule 40 CFR 63

Subpart VVVV.

Annual compliance

costs for all existing facilities were estimated at $14 million.

This included capital,

materials, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting costs.

66

FR 44222

Pet. at

8

notes

that USEPA estimates that complying with 40 CFR Subpart VVVV will cost $4060/ton

ofHAP reduced /year.

USEPA also estimated the capital costs for new equipment:

•

Resin Application Equipment (flowcoaters):

$6000 /

unit

•

Adhesive application Equipment:

$6000

I

unit

•

Resin and Gel Coat Mixer Covers:

$180 /

container

66

FR 44222

(a)

Would you please quantify the costs Crownline has spent on replacing the

atomized spray guns with flow-coat guns and switching to a lower styrene resin?

Crownline has already made the change in the lamination process.

Does

Crownline consider switching to flow-coat guns in the gel coat process an

alternative as well?

(b)

What other costs has Crownline incurred to meet the Federal rule?

(c)

Has Crownline estimated the additional

compliance costs associated with

monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting?

EXHIBIT

---

2

RESPONSE:

(a)

Crownline incurred a

caj’ifal éosfof$96~7JDUiñrejiiàci~g

The d~i~dsp~ày

guns in its lamination areas withflow-coat guns.

Crownline experimented with

usingflow-coat guns in

thegelcoatprocess,

but they had too much ofa negative

impact on product quality.

(b)

Crownline has had to incur an additional $4000 per week in labor costs in

the

lamination areafor additionalpersonnel to do roll out and touch up on the boats

in orderto maintain the sameproduct quality while

using the lower styrene

resins.

Crownline has also incurred over$80, 000

in outside consultingfees and

expenses.

(c)

It is estimated that it will cost Crownline approximately $7500 to complete the

software needed to allow computer aided ongoing compliance reporting and

recordkeeping under the MA CTand to prepare the MACTinitial compliance

certification.

The monthly costfor calculating the 12 month

rollingaverage

compliance demonstration required by the MACT is estimated at approximately

$500per month.

In total,

Crownline anticipates its annual compliance costs to

be approximately

$215,600 peryear.

This is calculated by mult4’lying the additional labor costs

($4000per week) by 50 weeks to equal an amount of $200, 000.

To this amount is

then added $6000 (for the $500 needed each month to do recordkeeping and

reporting) and $9600

(which is the $96,000 capital costfor replacing the

atomizedguns withflow coat guns, annualized over 10 years)for

a total of

$215,600.

2.

Pet.

at 2 states, “Crownline took steps earlyto comply with the Federal

MACT and

came into compliance with the MACT emission limits more that a year prior to the

deadline.”

(Pet. at 2.)

Further down on that

same page, the Petition states that the costs

to install tail-stack controls to

comply with the

8

lb/hr Rule would range from

approximately $7 million to $14 million and that “This equates to approximately $35,000

to

$58,000 per ton ofpollutant removed on top ofthe costs Crownline will have to incur

to

comply with the newly promulgated MACT standard.”

(Emphasis added.)

(Pet. at 2.)

(a)

Would you please clarify whether Crownline has already incurred costs to come

into compliance with the Federal standard?

Ifso, what was the cost incurred to

comply with the Federal standard?

Does Crownline expect to incur additional

costs?

(b)

Could you please calculate a total cost / ton HAP reduced / year that Crownline

will incur as a result ofcomplying with 40 CFR Subpart VVVV.

---

3

RESPONSE:

(a)

See response to Question

1.

(b)

Crownline estimates that the annual amount ofHAPs (not total VOM) reduced by

complying with the MACT is approximately 50 tons peryear.

Based upon

Crownline ‘s estimate of $215, 600for additional annual operational costs

(as

discussed in response to Question labove), this would equate

to $4,312 /ton of

HAP reduced/year ($215,600peryear÷

50 tons).

35

IAC 104.406

(1)

3.

Petition at 2 states, “Crownline took steps early to comply with the MACT and came into

compliance with the MACT emission limits more than a year prior to

the deadline.”

Pet.

at2.

(a)

Could you please indicate if Crownline has made a demonstration ofcompliance

with the new NESHAP regulations under 40 CFR Part 64 Subpart VVVV to

USEPA yet?

Did USEPA respond to

the compliance demonstration, and if so,

how?

(b)

Since Crownline is proposing replacing the 1-hour averaging time under the 8

lb/hr rule, would you please describe over what time period emissions will be

averaged under 40 CFR Subpart VVVV?

Since the boat-buildingprocess takes

an

average of22 days, would it be technically feasible and economically

reasonable to

average emissions

on a 1-day, 7-day or 30-day rolling average

instead ofa 12-month rolling average?

Would this help to more closely monitor

the daily and seasonal impact ofthe emissions that the 1-hour averaging required

under the 8 lb/hr rule?

RESPONSE:

(a)

Crownline has not made a demonstration ofcompliance.

This will not be due

until August 2005.

(b)

The new MACTstandard requires thatfor the

“modelpoint value averaging

option” (which Crownline plans to use to

demonstrate compliance with the

MA CT), compliance is to be demonstrated on

a

12-month rolling average.

Having to demonstrate compliancefor a

timeperiod shorter than

on

a 12-month

rolling average would be technically and economically unreasonable.

First,

this

would place Crownline at a sign~fIcantcompetitive disadvantage versus its

competitors in other states and would make its current way of doing business

impossible.

Crownline does not maintain a large inventory of boats,

but has built

its

business and reputation on allowing customers to

order customized boats,

offering afull array ofpotential options, styles and colors

a customer can

choose

---

4

from.

To be able to offer this service to customers, Crownline has

to build its

boats quickly and deliver them

to the customeron an

expedited basis.

Having to

demonstrate compliance on

a timeframe less than

on

a 12-month rollingaverage

would make Crownline ‘s entire method ofbusiness next to

impossible.

For

example, ~fCrownline had to demonstrate compliance on

a 30-day rolling

average, there may be months were

Crownline would have to

tell its customers

that they couldnot get certain boat models that month.

Second, havingto

demonstrate compliance on a

timeframe less than a 12-month rolling average

would also greatly increase Crownline

~s’

time and expense in monitoring its

compliance as compared to its

competitors.

Even

~f

compliance was to be

demonstrated on

a 30-day rolling average, it would essentially mean that

compliance would have to be monitored on

a daily basis, which would be an

extremely time and labor intensive undertaking.

It is important to

note that

in

developing the new MACTstandard, EPA contemplated requiring a shorter time

period than 12 months to demonstrate compliance but chose to use the 12-month

rolling average.

4.

Petition

at 3 quotes the definition of“emission source” from 35

JAC 201.102 as “any

equipment or facility ofa type capable of emitting specified air contaminants to the

atmosphere.”

The Petition’s Technical Document in Appendix

5

is a letter from

Crownline’ s environmental consultant to IEPA seeking to

resolve the issue ofproperly

defining the term “emission source” for purposes ofapplying the 8 lb/hr rule.

(a)

Could you please explain how Crownline is regulated under 35

IAC 215.301

in

the context ofthe definition of “emission source.”

Is the whole facility regulated

as one source ordo

individual sources exist within the facility that are regulated

as separate sources?

Could you please identify the individual emission source/s at

Crownline regulated under 35 JAC 215.301?

Is each boat line or model line

considered an emission source?

Is the process ofbuilding each boat considered

an emission source?

Is each spray gun

considered an emission source?

(b)

IEPA’s recommendation (1-22-04) included one

condition relating to testing

which Crownline found vague and overly broad.

In Crownline’s Response to the

Recommendation ofthe Illinois EPA, Crownline suggests the two parties might

reach a compromise on this language in time for hearing.

Could you please

provide an update on this?

RESPONSE:

(a)

IEPA has directed Crownline to consider the boatpart (e.g.,

hull,

deck, etc.) as

the

“emission source“forpurposes ofcomplying with 35 IAC 215.301.

(b)

Crownline and IEPA have reached a compromise on the language and conditions

ofthe proposed adjusted standard.

Attached is a

copy ofthe proposed language

and conditions ofthe adjusted standard to

which Crownline and IEPA have

agreed.

---

5

35

IAC 104.406

(g)

5.

The Technical Document prepared by AEA

on

page

7 states, “Estimates

ofhourly VOM

emissions

from Crownline’s gelcoat and lamination operations in compliance with the

MACT are set forth in Exhibit 4 ofAppendix 6.”

However, Exhibit 4 ofAppendix 6

seems to

show the annual total emissions in tons per year (tpy) rather than estimates of

the total emissions on an hourly basis in pounds per hour (lb/br).

Appendix 7 shows

estimates ofhourly VOM emissions

(lb/br), but only from the caulking, adhesive and

lacquer operations.

(a)

Could you please provide data in a format similar to Appendix 7

in lb/hr for the

gelcoat and

lamination operations for the sake ofcomparison to the

8

lb/hr rule?

(b)

Appendix 8 ofthe Technical Document contains a table entitled “Crownline

Small Part Usage in Pounds ofMaterial;

MACT Compliance Scenario.”

Could

you please specify the units ofmeasurement for each colunm in the table?

RESPONSE:

(a)

When

Crownline originally beganpreparing the Technical Document,

Crownline

planned to include several charts Crownline had developed using 2000 data

showing estimated hourly emissionsfor the lamination and gelcoat areas broken

down

by boat model.

However,

these emission estimates were based upon

preliminary materials

usage data which was available at that time, but which

Crownline later discovered had overestimated VOMemissions.

Because

Crownline knew these emission estimates did not best reflect the emissionsfrom

these operations,

Crownline decided not to include the estimates in the Technical

Documentfiled in December 2003.

The language quotedfrom the Technical

Document in Question 5 above, should have been deletedfrom thefinal version of

the Technical Document.

Crownline apologizesfor this oversight.

However,

we

are attaching these charts to

this Response (identified as Exhibits

1 through

6)

with appropriate caveats concerning the data.

Since preparing these charts,

Crownline has gone backand estimatedhourly

VOM emissionsfor afew boat

models using more accurate materials usage data.

Although these calculations

confirmedthat the estimatesfrom 2000 overestimated emissions, there are still a

signijIcant number ofboat models which would have emissions greater than 8

lb/hr.

when

VOM emissions are determinedon strict hourly basis.

(b)

Attached is

a revisedcopy of the table with the units ofmeasurement included.

6.

The Federal NESHAP regulations at 40 CFR 63.5698 provide a formula to calculate the

HAP

emission limit based on a 12-month rolling average.

---

6

(a)

Would you please identify Crownline’s HAP Emission Limit per 40 CFR

63.5698

and show how Crownline calculated it.

RESPONSE:

(a)

The HAP emission limit will varyfrom

month to

month based upon the equation

set forth in 40 CFR 63.5698.

Attached are monthly spread sheets from September

2003 through March 2004 showing the calculatedHAP emission limits and the

HAP emissionsfor Crownlinefor those months.

7.

Pet. at 2 references USEPA’s discussion ofthe NESHAP for Boat Manufacturing in the

Federal Register 66

FR 44222.

Referring to the Federal Register discussion, USEPA

provides the following figures:

•

Existing facilities:

119

•

Rate ofgrowth:

5 facilities

I

year for next 5 years

•

1997 baseline emissions:

9920

tpy

•

NESHAP reductions:

3450

tpy

•

total reduction in HAP:

35

•

Total Annual Compliance Costs:

$14 million

•

Annual Costs:

$4060 /

ton

HAP reduced

•

Capital costs:

o

Resin application equipment:

$6000 / unit

o

Adhesive application equipment:

$6000 / unit

o

Resin and gel coat mixer covers:

$180

I

year

I

container

66

FR 44222

Based on these figures,

the following averages can be calculated:

•

1997 baseline emissions:

9920 tpy/1 19 facilities

=

83.4 tpy/facility

•

NESHAP emissions reductions:

(9920-3450 tpy)/1 19 facilities

=

54.4

tpy/facility

•

Annual Compliance Costs:

$14 million / 119 facilities

=

$117,647/facility

•

total reduction in HAP:

35

(a)

Could you please make a relative comparison of Crownline’s figures to

the

averages calculated above:

1.

How do Crownline’s 2003 Pre-MACT emissions

compare to the average ofthe

facilities as depicted above?

2.

How do Crownline’s proposed NESHAP emissions

reductions compare to

the

average ofthe facilities above?

3.

How do Crownline’s annual compliance costs compare with the average ofthe

facilities above?

---

7

4.

How does Crownline’s annual cost ofreduced HAP

compare to the USEPA figure

of $4060 / ton?

5.

Comparing the Pre-MACT Scenario to the MACT Standard Compliance Scenario

presented as Exhibits

3 and 4

in Appendix 6 ofthe Technical Document, would you

please estimate the

reduction in total HAP emissions.

Comparing the Pre-MACT

Scenario to the

8 lb/hr Compliance Scenario presented in Exhibits

3 and

5,

would

you please estimate the

reduction in total HAP

emissions.

Would you please

compare these

reduction figures to the

35

overall figure that USEPA estimated?

If the

reduction proposedby Crownline for this

adjusted standard is less than

35,

are there additional measures Crownline could take to improve its reduction to

more closely approach the

35?

Ifyou are familiar with other affected facilities in

the boat manufacturing industry, could you please comment on how closely their

reductions approach USEPA’s anticipated overall percent reduction of

35?

(b)

IfCrownline were to experience a growth in production, could you please

comment on how

such growth would affect the VOM emissions:

1.

Could you please estimate on an hourly and annual basis how potential growth

would affect VOM emissions in comparison to the dataprovided forthe 2003

production year?

I.e.- would Crownline add new production lines? Increase

hours/day ofproduction? Build a new facility?

2.

By estimating a larger figure to represent potential increased VOM emissions

5 to

10 years in the future, how would the Ozone Impact Analysis

conducted by AEA

change in showing an exceedence

at the local

air monitor?

3.

Would such potential increased

VOM emissions from Crownline’s operations

require IEPA to return to USEPA for another SIP revision?

RESPONSE:

(a)

1.

Crownline ‘s Pre-MACT emissions were approximately 204 tons ofHAPs peryear

as compared to 83.4 tons/year which is the averagefacilities mentioned above.

Obviously the amount oftotal emissions ofHAPs peryear will vary depending

upon the number and size ofthe boats produced.

Crownline produces more boats

(or larger boats) than the average ofthefacilities mentioned above.

2.

Crownline estimates itHAP emission reductions at approximately 50 tons/year,

as compared to

29 tons/year which

is the average of thefacilities mentioned

above.

---

8

3.

Crownline~ annual compliance costs are estimatedat $215,600

(~see

response to

Question 1) as compared to $11 7,647for the average ofthefacilities mentioned

above.

4.

Crownline ‘.s’ annual compliance cost (not including the initial capital

expenditures)

is approximately $4,312/ton ofHAP reduced, which is very similar

to

the $4060/tonfor the average ofthefacilities mentioned above.

5.

Crownline estimates its percentreduction in

total HAP emissions at

approximately 25

as compared to the 35

estimated by US. EPA.

It should be

noted that EPA‘s estimate was merely an estimate ofwhat the anticipated

reduction would be and Crownline is not aware ofwhat actual reductions other

companies are experiencing.

At this time, it is impossible to know whether

Crownline ‘s percent reduction is similar to

or even greater than

actual reductions

experienced by other companies.

More importantly,

in

orderto do

a meaningful

comparison ofpercent HAP reductions, it wouldfirst have to

be determined what

the baseline levels were.

In other words,

~f

the average company was using resins

and gelcoats with a high HAP content,

theirpercent reduction when they begin to

comply with theMA CT will be higher.

As

a result, without knowing the baseline,

it is d?fficult to compare thepercent reduction in HAP emissions between

Crownline and the average ofthefacilities mentioned above.

Crownline has agreed to a proposal by IEPA that as a condition ofthis adjusted

standard,

Crownline will continue to investigate boatproduction methods with a

reduced VOMcontent and, where practicable, will substitute current coatings

with lower

VOM content coatings.

Crownline will also conduct any test ofnew

technologically or economically reasonable production methods or materials

applicable to

the open-moldfiberglass boat manufacturing industry which may

reduce VOM emissions at Crownline ‘sfacility which IEPA requests.

(b)

1.

Crownline ‘s CAA

Title

VPermit limits Crownline ‘s annual emissions to 249 tons

of VOMperyear.

As

a result,

~f

Crownline wished to sign~fIcantlyexpand it

current production, it would most likely need to obtain a permit amendment.

At

present,

Crownline does not have anypresentplans to

increase its production

capacity above the 249 ton permit limit.

Since Crownline does not have any

present expansion plans,

it has not estimated on an hourly or annual basis how

potential growth would affect VOMemissions.

2.

In response to

this question, Crownline reviewed its Ozone Impact Analysis and

the effect on ozone which would occur

~f

Crownline were to sign

?fi

cantly increase

its

VOM emissions.

In short,

Crownline couldmore than triple its current annual

VOM emissions without causing an exceedence of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.

---

9

3.

IEPA has requested, and Crownline has agreed to,

a condition in

the adjusted

standard that the adjustedstandard be limited to the emission activities at the

Crownline

West Frankfort, Illinoisfacility as of the date ofthe issuance ofthe

adjusted standard.

Crownline understands this

restriction to

mean that

Crownline will be able to

increaseproduction at itsfacility by increasing the

hours/days ofproduction and will be able to

build new boat models and/or

change the mix ofboat modelsfrom what is currently being constructed without

having to seek a

new or amended adjusted standard.

However,

Crownline would

be required to obtain

a new or amended adjustedstandard (andtherefore a new

SIP revision) ~fCrownline wishes to

add newproduction lines or build a new

facility which would have emissions greater than 8 lbs per hourfrom

any

emission source.

Respectfully Submitted,

BRYAN CAVE LLP

By:

Dale-k. Guariglia, MO Bar #3~988

One Metropolitan Square

211 North Broadway, Suite 3600

St.

Louis, Missouri 63102

Tel. (314) 259-2000

Fax. (314) 259-2020

Attorneys for Crownline Boats, Inc.

---

Apr11 23, 2004

CR0

WNLINE

REVISED ADJUSTED STANDARD LANGUAGE

As

an

alternative

to

compliance with

the

8 lb/hr

Rule

found at

35

lAG

~

215.301,

this

adjusted

standard

allows Crownline

to

limit its

discharge

of organic material

into

the atmosphere

from

its

boat

manufacturing operations

by operating in full compliance with the National

Emission Standard

for Hazardous

Air Pollutants

for New

and

Existing Boat Manufacturing

Facilities,

set

forth

at

40

CFR ~63Subpart VVVV,

as may be amended in the future, and with the following conditions:

a.

Crownline shall continue to investigate boat production methods with a reduced VOM

content and, where practicable,

shall substitute

current coatings with

lower VOM

content coatings

as long as such substitution does

not result in a net increase in VOM emissions.

Crownline shall be

required to

do

any reasonable

test

of new

technologically

or

economically

reasonable

production

methods or materials applicable to the open-mold fiberglass boat manufacturing industry which may

reduce

VOM

emissions

at

Crownline’s

facility which

the

Illinois

EPA Bureau

of Air

specifically

requests

in

writing that they do.

An

annual report

summarizing

the

activities and results of

these

investigatory

efforts

shall be

prepared by

Crownline

and

submitted

to

the Illinois

EPA Bureau of

Air, Compliance and Enforcement Section.

b.

The

relief granted in

this proceeding

shall

be

limited

to

the

emission

activities at

the

Crownline West Frankfort facility as of the date

of this filing

c.

Nothing

in

this

adjusted standard

shall relieve Crownline

of its

duty to operate

in

full

compliance with the Clean Air Act, its CAAPP, the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and other

applicable regulations not otherwise discussed herein.

1817792

---

Exhibit I

Crownline Boats, Inc.

-

Boat Model’

Resin2

Gelcoat3

Decks4

Hulls4

1st Skin5

(Ibs)

2nd

Skin5

(Ibs)

3rd Skin5

(Ibs)

1st Skin5

(Ibs)

2nd

Skin5

(Ibs)

3rd Skin5

(Ibs)

Floor6

(Ibs)

Deck4

(Ibs)

Hull4

(Ibs)

180

BR

68

107

8

98

145

0

128

35

45

180

CD

67

7

145

0

128

30

45

192 BR

163

4

175

0

180

40

55

202 BR

87

4

214

0

198

45

55

205 BR

143

0

199

0

208

75

60

205 CC

96

127

4

16

199

0

252

40

60

212DB

196

262

10

—

50

261

0

325

95

70

215CD

176

208

4

41

218

0

260

86

70

225 BR

108

137

17

30

262

0

232

50

65

225 CD

99

147

4

30

262

0

245

50

65

230 BR

153

221

0

147

313

0

273

103

70

230 CD

173

263

0

147

313

0

273

95

70

238DB

198

264

16

146

295

0

324

105

80

239DB

153

221

16

146

295

0

324

105

80

242 CD

174

246

0

221

339

249

281

95

90

248 BR

130

170

14

154

284

0

247

60

85

248 CD

191

247

14

152

284

0

246

100

85

262CR

202

299

0

180

312

309

345

115

92

262 CD

199

264

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

120

92

266 BR

154

201

16

165

287

0

290

70

80

266 CC

200

264

19

165

288

0

361

125

80

266 LTD

174

243

57

165

287

0

320

125

80

288 BR

263

295

0

252

426

390

433

145

95

290CR

277

367

1

301

516

411

405

150

115

Footnotes:

1The list of boat models produced

by Crownline changes annually depending

on customer tiemarids-.

However, this

list

reasonably represents the

types and sizes of boats made by Crownline

in 2000.

2The production

resin

used at Crownline is of one type and from one supplier.

Resin is applied to the

part after the gelcoat layer has been

applied

and

has cured.

As resin

is released at the gun tip, it mixes with chopped fiberglass thatissimuttaaeoiisly fed to thegun tIp

area.

‘Gelcoat is applied to the

boat mold to give it the outer shiny appearance and

color.

It is applied

before the

resin is applied.

4A deck is the top

portion of the

boat that lays on

top of the

hull.

A hull is the

base portion of the boat (has contact with the water)

5A skin

is one layer of gelcoat or resin

applied to the deck or hull.

In

lamination, more than

one skin

is applied

to reach the

desired

fiberglass/resin

layer thickness for the given

boat model.

Only one layer is applied during the

gelcoat operation.

6A floor is

the decking installed

in

a hull to house and

protect the gasolinwstoragwtank(s)and1Ioatatiunfc~am.

NA

=

not applicable

NOTE:

The

data

in this chart may not be accurate.

It was prepared

using 2000 data

and is based upon

material usage ameunisihi

“standard bills of materials” (BOM) developed to provide a basis for establishing the

sale price for each boat model.

To ensure that the

price

is set at an

amount that adequately covers Crownline’s costs for producing the boat plus a desired

profit margin, the

BOM

overestimates the amounts of materials

used to build each boat model.

---

Exhibit2

-

Resin and Gelcoat Application Time

Boat Model

Resin Application Time (hours)

Gelcoat Application Time (hours)

Decks

Hulls

1st Skin

2nd Skin

3rd Skin

1st Skin

2nd Skin

3rd Skin

Floor

Deck

Hull

18OBR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

18OCD

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

192BR

I

202BR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

205BR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

205CC

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

212DB

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

215CD

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

225BR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

225CD

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

230BR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

230CD

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

238DB

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

239DB

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

242CD

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

248BR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

248CD

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

262CR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

262CD

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

266BR_____

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

266CC

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

266LT~D

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

288BR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

290CR

I

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

---

Exhibit 3

Crownhine Boats, Inc.

-

VOM Content of Listed VOM/HAP Containing Materials

Boat Model

VOM Content1

Resin

Gelcoat

Lacquer

Adhesive

Caulking

Styrene

Styrene

MMA2

Other

VOM

VOM

VOM

180

BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

180 CD

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

192 BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

202 BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

205 BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

205 CC

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

212DB

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

215 CD

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

225 BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

225 CD

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

230 BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

230

CD

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

238DB

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

239DB

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

242 CD

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

248

BR

42.3

27

6

0.

154

71

19

9

248 CD

42.3

27

6

0.

154

71

19

9

262CR

42.3

27

6

0.

154

71

19

9

262 CD

42.3

27

6

0.

154

71

19

9

266

BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

266

CC

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

266

LTD

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

288 BR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

290CR

42.3

27

6

0.154

71

19

9

1Based on Material Safety Data Sheets available

in 2000.

2MMA

-

Methyl Methacrylate

---

Exhibit 4

Crownline

Boats, Inc.

-

West Frankfort,

Emission Factors1 Used To Compute Crownline’s Resin and Gelcoat VOM

Emissions

VOM

Emission Factors1

Boat Model

Resin

Gelcoat

Styrene

Styrene

Styrene

MMA

Deck

Hull

Deck

Hull

Deck

Hull

180

BR

17.6

18.2

42.3

46.4

100

100

180

Cb

17.6

18.2

42.3

46.4

100

100

192 BR

17.85

18.45

42.3

46.8

100

100

202 BR

18.1

18.7

42.3

47.2

100

100

205

BR

18.1

18.7

42.3

47.2

100

100

205

CC

18.1

18.7

42.3

47.2

100

100

212 bB

18.35

18.95

42.3

47.6

100

100

215

Cb

18.35

18.95

42.3

47.6

100

100

225

BR

18.6

19.2

42.3

48

100

100

225

Cb

18.6

19.2

42.3

48

100

100

230 BR

18.85

19.45

42.3

48.4

100

100

230

Cb

18.85

19.45

42.3

48.4

100

100

238

bB

18.85

19.45

42.3

48.4

100

100

239

bB

18.85

19.45

42.3

48.4

100

100

242

Cb

19.1

19.7

42.3

48.8

100

100

248 BR

19.1

19.7

42.3

48.8

100

100

248

Cb

19.1

19.7

42.3

48.8

100

100

262 CR

19.6

20.2

42.3

49.6

100

100

262

Cb

19.6

20.2

42.3

49.6

100

100

266

BR

19.6

20.2

42.3

49.6

100

100

266

CC

19.6

20.2

42.3

49.6

100

100

266

LTb

19.6

20.2

42.3

49.6

100

100

288 BR

20.1

20.7

42.3

50.4

100

100

290 CR

20.35

20.95

42.3

50.8

100

100

‘VOM emission factors were determined through interpolation of 1997 NMMA studydata

-

represents

the percent of compound

(i.e., styrene, MMA, etc.) emitted that is available in material as applied.

---

Exhibit

5

Crownllne Boats, Inc.

-

West Frankfort, Illinois

Estimated VOM Emissions From Plant Gelcoat and Resin Application Operations

Pre-Mact Scenario:

42.3

HAP resin, 43.2

HAP

gelcoat, air atomized spray gunsi

Boat Model2

Resin3

Gelcoat4

Decks5

Hulls’

1st Skin6

(lb/hr)

2nd Skin6

(lb/hi’)

3rd Skin6

(Ib/hr)

1st Skin6

(Ib/hr)

2nd

Skin6

(Ib/hr)

3rd

Skin6

(lblhr)

T1~

(lb/hr)

(lb/hr)

Hull’

(Ib/hr)

180 BR

5.1

8.0

0.6

7.5

11.2

0.0

9.9

6.1

8.3

18OCD

5.0

7.4

0.5

7.5

11.2

0.0

9.9

5.2

8.3

192

BR

12.3

15.0

0.3

8.7

13.7

0.0

14.0

7.0

10.2

202 BR

6.7

9.7

0.3

9.5

16.9

0.0

15.7

7.8

10.3

205

BR

10.9

14.1

0.0

9.2

15.7

0.0

16.5

13.1

11.2

205CC

7.4

9.7

0.3

9.2

15.7

0.0

19.9

7.0

11.2

212DB

15.2

20.3

0.8

12.0

20.9

0.0

26.1

16.5

13.2

215CD

13.7

16.1

0.3

11.3

17.5

0.0

20.8

15.0

13.2

225

BR

8.5

10.8

1.3

10.6

21.3

0.0

18.8

8.7

12.3

225

CD

7.8

11.6

0.3

10.6

21.3

0.0

19.9

8.7

12.3

230 BR

12.2

17.6

0.0

12.1

25.8

0.0

22.5

17.9

13.3

230 CD

13.8

21.0

0.0

12.1

25.8

0.0

22.5

16.5

13.3

238DB

15.8

21.1

1.3

12.0

24.3

0.0

26.7

18.3

15.3

239DB

12.2

17.6

1.3

12.0

24.3

0.0

26.7

18.3

15.3

242 CD

14.1

19.9

0.0

18.4

28.2

20.7

234

16.5

17.3

248 BR

10.5

13.7

1.1

12.8

23.7

0.0

20.6

10.5

16.3

248 CD

15.4

20.0

1.1

12.7

23.7

0.0

20.5

17.4

16.3

262 CR

16.7

24.8

0.0

15.4

26.7

26.4

29.5

20.0

17.8

262 CD

16.5

21.9

0.0

NA

NA

NA

NA

20.9

17.8

266 BR

12.8

16.7

1.3

14.1

24.5

0.0

24.8

12.2

15.5

266CC

16.6

21.9

1.6

14.1

24.6

0.0

30.8

21.8

15.5

266

LTD

14.4

20.1

4.7

14.1

24.5

0.0

27.3

21.8

15.5

288 BR

22.4

25.1

0.0

22.1

37.3

34.1

37.9

16.6

12.9

290 CR

23.8

31.6

0.1

26.7

45.7

36.4

35.9

17.1

15.8

Footnotes:

‘PriortoJanuary2003,

air atomized guns were used for both

resin

and gelcoatapplication

-

but onlyfor gelcoatsince then.

2The fat

of

boatmodels

produced by Crownline changes annually depending on customer demands.

However, this list

reasonably represents

thetypes and sizes

of

boats made

by Crownline in 2000.

‘The

production resin used atCrownhjne is ofone type and from one supplier.

Resin is applied tothe

part alter thegelcoat layer has

been

applied and has cured.

As

resin

is released at the gun tip, it

mises

with

chopped fiberglass that is

simultaneously fed to the gun

tip area.

‘Gelcoat is

appliedto the boat

mold to giveit the outer shinyappearance and color.

Itis

applied beforethe resin is applied.

5Adeck is the top portion ofthe boat that lays

ontop ofthe

hull.

A hull is

the base portion of the boat

(has contact with the water)

6Askin is one

layerofgelcoat or resin applied to

the deckor hull.

In lamination, more than one skin is applied to reach the desired

fiberglasalresin layer thickness for the given

boat model.

Only one layer

is applied during the gelcoat operation.

7A

floor

is the

decking installed inS

hull tohouse and protect thegasoline

storagetank(s) and floatationfoam.

NA

=

not applicable

Note: For purpoaes ofthe above analysis, the terms HAP andVOM are assumed tobe interchangeable

NOTE:

The

data in this chart may

not be accurate.

It was prepared

using 2000

data and

is based

upon material usage amounts in “standard bills of materials”

(BOM) which were developed to provide a basis for establishing the

sale price for

each boat model.

To ensure that the

price

is set at an amount that adequately

covers Crowrtline’s costs for producing the boat plus a desired profit margin, the

BOM overestimates the amounts of materials used to build each

boat model

made

by Crownline and therefore

overestimates emissions ofVOM5 and HAP5.

Also, actual versus estimated usages areaffected by other

factors such as:

-

Differences in the

efficiency of application from one production crew to

another;

-

Crownline’s application of an average “scrap factor” in the

BOM (a percentage

of the total

to estimate

the amount of each material used in the gelcoat and

lamination areas ofthe

production process); and

-

Humidity ofthe room

air.

Based on the above information, the

estimated hourly VOM values shown

in

Exhibits 5 and 6 are higher than actual emissions.

However, they are

appropriate for the purpose of making a comparison between the

pre-MACT and

post-MACT emissions levels, i.e., to estimate

a relative percent reduction in

VOM

emissions from Crownline’s boat production operations.

Please also note that this table shows no change in emissions for gelcoat

operations between the

MACT and pre-MACT scenarios.

This is because

NMMA data for emissions from

gelcoat operations was based strictly on a single

data point, i.e., one gelcoat at one HAP content appried to various hull and deck

lengths, therefore, the emission factor

did not

take

into account the amount of

HAP

emission reduction that would result from the

use of lower HAP gelcoats.

However, it is also important to note that Crownline has reduced the

HAP content

of

two types

of gelcoat materials that they used

in the largest

amounts (opal and

moonstone) from an average of approximately 43 percent to 33 percent.

Therefore, the

actual reduction in HAP (and, therefore, VOM) emissions from

Crownline’s gelcoat operations are significantly lower than those shown

in this

table.

---

Exhibit 6

Crownline Boats. Inc.

-

West

Frankfort,

Illinois

Estimated VOM Emissions

From Plant Gelcoat and

Resin Application Operations

MACT Standard Compliance Scenario:

35

HAP resin, 43.2

HAP gelcoat, flow-coat chopper guns1

oat Model

Resin’

Gelcoat4

Decks’

Hulls5

1st Skin6

(lblhr)

2nd

Skin6

(lb/hr)

3rd

Skin6

(lb/hr)

1st Skin6

(lb/hr)

2nd Skin6

(lb/hr)

3rd

Skin6

(lblhr)

Floor7

(lb/hr)

Deck5

(lb/hr)

Hull’

(lb/hr)

180

BR

2.4

3.7

0.3

3.3

4.8

0.0

4.3

6.1

8.3

180 CD

2.3

3.4

0.2

3.3

4.8

0.0

4.3

5.2

8.3

192

BR

5.7

7.0

0.1

3.8

5.9

0.0

6.1

7.0

10.2

202

BR

3.1

4.5

0.1

4.1

7.3

0.0

6.8

7.8

10.3

205

BR

5.1

6.6

0.0

4.0

6.8

0.0

7.1

13.1

11.2

205 CC

3.4

4.5

0.1

4.0

6.8

0.0

8.6

7.0

11.2

212DB

7.1

9.5

0.4

5.2

9.0

0.0

11.3

16.5

13.2

215 CD

6.4

7.5

0.1

4.9

7.5

0.0

9.0

15.0

13.2

225

BR

4.0

5.0

0.6

4.6

9.2

0.0

8.1

8.7

12.3

225 CD

3.6

5.4

0.1

4.6

9.2

0.0

8.6

8.7

12.3

230 BR

5.7

8.2

0.0

5.2

11.1

0.0

9.7

17.9

13.3

230 CD

6.4

9.8

0.0

5.2

11.1

0.0

9.7

16.5

13.3

238DB

7.4

9.8

0.6

5.2

10.5

0.0

11.5

18.3

15.3

239DB

5.7

8.2

0.6

5.2

10.5

0.0

11.5

18.3

15.3

242 CD

6.6

9.3

0.0

8.0

12.2

9.0

10.1

16.5

17.3

248 BR

4.9

6.4

0.5

5.5

10.2

0.0

8.9

10.5

16.3

248 CD

7.2

9.3

0.5

5.5

10.2

0.0

8.9

17.4

16.3

262 CR

7.8

11.6

0.0

6.6

11.5

11.4

12.7

20.0

17.8

262 CD

7.7

10.2

0.0

NA

NA

NA

NA

10.7

20.9

17.8

266 BR

6.0

7.8

0.6

6.1

10.6

0.0

12.2

15.5

266 CC

7.7

10.2

0.7

6.1

10.6

0.0

13.3

21.8

15.5

266

LTD

6.7

9.4

2.2

6.1

10.6

0.0

11.8

21.8

15.5

288 BR

10.4

11.7

0.0

9.5

16.1

14.7

16.4

16.6

12.9

290CR

11.1

14.7

0.0

11.5

19.8

15.7

15.5

17.1

15.8

Footnotes:

1A flowcoat chopper gun applies

resin

ata low pressure causing

the resin to

ifiow”

ratherthan be atomized into a fine mist-like spray.

‘The list of boatmodels produced

by Crownline changes annually depending on customer demands.

However, this list

reasonably represents the types and sizes of boats

made by Crownline

in 2000.

‘The production resin used

at

Crownline is of one type and from

one supplier.

Resin

is applied to

the part after the getcoat layer has

been

appliedand has

cured.

As

resin is released at the gun lip,

it

mixes

with

chopped fiberglass that is simultaneously fed to the gun tip area.

4Getcoatis applied to the boat mold to give it the outer shinyappearance and color.

It is applied before the resin is applied.

5A deck is the top portion of the boatthat lays

on top of the hull.

A hull is the base

portion of the boat (has contactwith

the water)

6A skin

is one layer of gelcoat or resin applied to the deck or

hull.

In lamination, more than oneskin

is applied to reach the desired

flberglassfresin

layer thickness for the given boat model.

Only one layer is applied during the gelcoat operation.

7A floor is the deckinginstalled ina hull to house and protectthe gasoline

storage

tank(s) and floatation foam.

NA

=

not applicable

Note: Forpurposes ofthe above analysis, the terms HAP and VOM are assumed to be interchangeable

~JOTE:

The

data in this chart maynot be accurate,

Itwas

prepared using 2000

data andis

based

upon material usage amounts

in “standard

bills of materials”

BOM)

developed to provide a basis for establishing the sale price for each boat

model.

To ensure thatthe price

is setat an amount that adequately covers

Crownline’s costsfor producing the

boatplus a desired profit margin, the BOM

overestimatesthe amounts of materials

used to build each boat model

made by

Crownline and therefore overestimates emissions of VOM5

and HAPs.

fJso,

actual

versus

estimated

usages

are affected by other factors such as:

Differences in

the efficiency of application

from

one

production

crew to another;

Crownline’s application of anaverage “scrap factor” in the BOM (a percentage of

the total to estimate

the amount of each

material used in the

gelcoatand

lamination

areas

of the

production process); and

Humidity of the room air.

Based on the above information,

the estimated

hourly VOM values

shown in

Exhibits 5 and 6 are higher than

actual

emissions.

However, they are appropriate

forthe purpose of making a comparison between the

pre-MACTand post-MACT

emissions

levels,

i.e.. to estimate a relative percent reduction

in VOM emissions

from Crownilne’s boat production operations.

Please also note thatthis table shows

no

change in

emissions for gelcoat

operations between the MACTand pre-MACTscenarios.

This

is because

NMMA

data for emissions

from

gelcoatoperations

was

based

strictly

ona single data

point, i.e., one

gelcoat

at one HAP content applied

to varioushull and

decklengths,

therefore, the emission factordid not take

into accountthe amount of HAP

emissionreduction that would result from

the use of lower HAP

gelcoats.

However,

it is also important to note that Crownilne has

reducedthe HAP contentof two types

ofgelcoat materials thatthey used

in the largest amounts (opal and

moonstone)

froman average of approximately 43 percent to 33 percent

Therefore,

the actual

reductionin

HAP (and, therefore, VOM) emissions from

Crownline’s

gelcoat

operations are

significantly lower than those shown in

this table.

---

Crownline Boats Emissions From

Small Parts Production By Boat Model

MACT Compliance

Scenario

(Page

1

of 4)

Boat Model

Part Description

Part No.

Appl.

Time (Hrs)

Usage Amount

(Ibs)

VOM

Content (Wt. Fraction)

VOM Emission Factor*

VOM Emissions (Ibs/hr)

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin & Catalyst

192

BRw/Liner

Swim Plafform

43554

1.00

6.25

40.00

0.83

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.00

2.5

192

BRw/Liner

Motor Box

43558

1.00

8.00

63.00

1.41

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.30

3.9

192 BRw/Liner

Box Ft Star/Port

59024

1.00

0.10

17.00

0.60

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.00

1.1

192 BRw/Liner

Lid, Fuel Tank

61179

1.00

4.00

27.00

0.64

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.60

1.7

2O5BRLShape

Sundeck

59356

1.00

12.00

79.00

2.20

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.90

4.9

205 BRLShape

Dash, PortSide

59357

1.00

8.75

50.00

1.13

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.40

3.1

205 BRLShape

Lid, Ladder

59472

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1.1

205CC Super Sport

Lid, Ladder

43505

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1.1

212DB

Lid,

Ladder

43505

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1.1

212DB

Lid, Ladder

43553

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

212DB

Door, Head

Hatch

59060

1.00

2.00

16.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1

212DB

Seat Base

61182

1.00

9.00

46.00

1.43

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.50

2.9

2l5CCSuperSport

MotorBox

43559

1.00

8.00

63.00

1.53

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.30

3.9

2lsCCSuperSport

Helm

59607

1.00

14.00

62.00

1.59

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.30

3.9

215 CC SuperSport

Door, Cabin

59621

1.00

7.50

38.00

0.88

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.20

2.4

230 BR L-Shaped 2 Buckets

Lid,

Ladder

43560

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

230 BR L-Shaped2Buckets

Lid, Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

230 BR L-Shaped 2 Buckets

Door, Head Hatch

59611

1.00

3.70

26.00

0.61

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.60

1.6

230 BR L-Shaped 2 Buckets

Head

Camp Liner

59697

1.00

9.00

71.00

1.65

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.50

4.4

23oCCSuperSport

Lid,FuelTank

59358

1.00

3.00

31.00

0.70

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.50

1.9

230 CCSuper Sport

Console

59359

1.00

7.67

55.00

1.30

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.20

3.4

23oCCSuperSport

Helm

59360

1.00

12.90

65.00

1.63

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.10

4.1

230 CCSuperSport

Lid, Ladder

59472

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1.1

238DB

Lid, Ladder

43560

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

238DB

Door, Head Hatch

59060

1.00

2.00

16.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1

238DB

Seat Base

.

61182

1,00

9.00

46.00

1.43

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.50

2.9

239DB Lshaped Two Buckets

Lid, Ladder

43560

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

239DBLshapedTwoBuckets

Lid,Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

239 DB Lshaped Two Buckets

Door, Head Hatch

59611

1.00

3.70

26.00

0.61

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.60

1.6

239DBLshapedTwoBuckets

SeatBase

59612

1.00

6.80

76.00

1.69

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.10

4.7

239DBLshapedlwoBuckets

HeadCompLiner

59697

1.00

9.00

71.00

1.65

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.50

4.4

242 CR 2002 Base Boat

Lid, Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

242 CR2002 Base Boat

Showerw/Sink

43571

1.00

9.00

64.00

1.51

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.50

4

-

fraction of VOM

(as styrene/MMA) that is emitted based on the

amount available in the materiai as applied.

---

Boat Model

Part Description

Part No.

AppI.

Time (I-Irs)

Usage Amount

(Ibs)

VOM Content (Wt. Fraction)

VOM Emission

Factor*

VOM Emissions (lbs/hr)

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin & Catalyst

242 CR 2002 Base Boat

Showerw/Bottom

43572

1.00

14.34

90.00

2.16

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.30

5.6

242 CR 2002 Base Boat

Mator Hatch

59613

1.00

6.00

78.00

1.75

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.00

4.9

242 CR2002 Base Boat

Helm

.

59614

1.00

14.00

65.00

1.90

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.30

4.1

262 CRBase

Boat

Motor Hatch

59613

1.00

6.00

78.00

1.75

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.00

4.9

262 CRBase

Boat

Helm

59614

1.00

14.00

65.00

1.90

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.30

4.1

262 CRBase Boat

Showerw/Sink

59615

1.00

11.34

93.00

2.18

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.80

5.8

262

CRBase Boat

Showerw/Bottom

59616

1.00

17.70

120.00

2.84

0.431

0.423

0,03

0.375

0.146

1

2.90

7.5

262 CR Base Boat

Top, Shower Marble

59619

1.00

NA

3.00

0.26

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

NA

0.2

266BRSuperSport

Lid,AnchorStorage

43524

1.00

2.50

16.00

0.26

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1

266 BRSuperSport

Lid,

Ladder

43552

1.00

2.50

19.00

0.46

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1.2

266CCwith

Liner

Lid,AnchorStorage

20543

1.00

2.34

20.00

0.46

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1.2

266 CCwith Liner

Lid, Fuel Tank

20570

1.00

4.00

32.50

0.75

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.60

2

266 CCwith Liner

Lid,

Ladder

43516

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

266 CCwith Liner

Helm

43556

1.00

8.40

52.50

1.31

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.40

3.3

266 CCwith Liner

Lid, Ski Locker

43563

1.00

2.40

14.70

0.36

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

0.9

266 CCwith Liner

Seat Base

59474

1.00

12.40

75.80

1.82

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.00

4.7

266 CCwith Liner

Wetbar

60610

1.00

2.00

12.60

0.30

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

0.8

266 CC with

Liner

Wetbar

60629

1.00

1.84

10.75

0.27

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

0.7

288 BR

Lid,

Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.1

288 BR

Door,

Head Hatch

59060

1.00

2.00

16.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1

288 BR

Sundeck

59362

1.00

16.50

92.40

2.62

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.70

5.8

288 BR

Door,

Head

59364

1.00

3.40

30.00

0.59

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.50

1.9

288 BR

Head Comp Liner

59365

1.00

15.34

91.40

2.23

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.50

5.7

288 BR

Helm

59366

1.00

11.00

58.80

1.64

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.80

3.7

288 BR

Door, Side Entry

59367

1.00

4.70

8.40

0.28

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.80

0.5

290 CR Base Boat

Lid,

Ladder

43505

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.40

1.1

290 CR Base Boat

Showerw/Bottom

43568

1.00

12.50

125.00

2.81

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

2.00

7.8

29OCRBaseBoat

Helm

61317

1.00

18.70

68.25

2.13

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

3.00

4.3

29OCRBaseBoat

MotorHatch

61318

1.00

8.20

91.40

2.04

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.30

5.7

290 CR Base Boat

Lid,

Ladder

61319

1.00

2.00

19.00

0.45

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

0.30

1.2

290 CR Base Boat

Shower Wall

61321

1.00

7.34

101.90

2.20

0.431

0.423

0.03

0.375

0.146

1

1.20

6.4

180 BR

No Glass Small Parts

180 CC

No Glass Small Parts

*

-

fraction ofVOM

(as styrene/MMA) that is emitted

based on the amount available in the material as applied.

Page 2 of 4

---

Boat Model

Part Description

Part No.

AppI.

Time (Hrs)

Usage_Amount (Ibs)

VOM Content (Wt. Fraction)

VOM

Emission Factor*

VOM Emissions (lbs/hr)

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin & Catalyst

192 BR w/Liner

Swim Platform

43554

1.00

6.25

40.00

0.83

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.80

1.4

192BRw/Liner

MotorBox

43558

1.00

8.00

63.00

1.41

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.00

2.2

192 BRw/Liner

Box

Ft Star/Port

59024

1.00

0.10

17.00

0.60

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.00

0.6

192 BRw/Liner

Lid, Fuel Tank

61179

1.00

4.00

27.00

0.64

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.50

1

205

BRLShape

Sundeck

59356

1.00

12,00

79.00

2.20

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.50

2.8

205 BR

L Shape

Dash, Port Side

59357

1.00

8.75

50.00

1.13

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.10

1.8

205

BR L Shape

Lid, Ladder

59472

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.6

205 CC Super Sport

Lid, Ladder

43505

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.6

212 DB

Lid, Ladder

43505

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.6

212DB

Lid, Ladder

43553

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

212 DB

Door, Head Hatch

59060

1.00

2.00

16.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

212DB

Seat Base

61182

1.00

9.00

46.00

1.43

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.10

1.6

2l5CCSuperSport

MotorBox

43559

1.00

8.00

63.00

1.53

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.00

2.2

2l5CCSuperSport

Helm

59607

1.00

14.00

62.00

1.59

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.70

2.2

215 CCSuperSport

Door, Cabin

59621

1.00

7.50

38.00

0.88

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.90

1.3

230 BR L-Shaped 2 Buckets

Lid,

Ladder

43560

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

230 BR L-Shaped 2 Buckets

Lid, Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

230 BR L-Shaped 2 Buckets

Door, Head Hatch

59611

1.00

3.70

26.00

0.61

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.50

0.9

230 BR L-Shaped 2 Buckets

Head Comp Liner

59697

1.00

9.00

71.00

1.65

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.10

2.5

230 CC Super Sport

Lid,

Fuel Tank

59358

1.00

3.00

31.00

0.70

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.40

1.1

230 CCSuper Sport

Console

59359

1.00

7.67

55.00

1.30

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.90

1.9

230CC Super Sport

Helm

59360

1.00

12.90

65.00

1.63

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.60

2.3

230 CCSuperSport

Lid, Ladder

59472

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.6

238DB

Lid,

Ladder

43560

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

238DB

Door, Head

Hatch

59060

1.00

2.00

16.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

238DB

Seat Base

61182

1.00

9.00

46.00

1.43

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.10

1.6

239DB Lshaped Two Buckets

Lid,

Ladder

43560

1.00

1.75

17.00

0.38

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

239 DB Lshaped Two Buckets

Lid, Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

020

0.6

239DB Lshaped Two Buckets

Door, Head

Hatch

59611

1.00

3.70

26.00

0.61

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.50

0.9

239DB Lshaped Two Buckets

Seat Base

59612

1.00

6.80

76.00

1.69

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.80

2.7

239DB Lshaped Two Buckets

Head Comp

Liner

59697

1.00

9.00

71.00

1.65

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.10

2.5

242 CR2002 Base Boat

Lid,

Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

242CR2002BaseBoat

Showerw/Sink

43571

1.00

9.00

64.00

1.51

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.10

2.3

242 CR2002 Base Boat

Showerw/Bottom

43572

1.00

14.34

90.00

2.16

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.80

3.2

-

traction

of VOM (as styrene/MMA) that is emitted based

on the

amount availaDle in the material as

applied.

Page 3 of4

---

Boat Model

Part Description

Part No.

AppI.

Time (Hrs)

Usage Amount (Ibs)

VOM Content (Wt. Fraction)

VOM Emission Factor”

VOM

Emissions (lbs/hr)

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin

Catalyst

Gelcoat

Resin & Catalyst

242 CR2002 Base Boat

Mator Hatch

59613

1.00

6.00

78.00

1.75

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.70

2.8

242 CR 2002 Base Boat

Helm

59614

1.00

14.00

65.00

1.90

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0,099

1

1.70

2.3

262CRBaseBoat

MotorHatch

59613

1.00

6.00

78.00

1.75

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.70

2.8

262CRBaseBoat

Helm

59614

1.00

14.00

65.00

1.90

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.70

2.3

262 CR

Base Boat

Showerw/Sink

59615

1.00

11.34

93.00

2.18

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.40

3.3

262 CR

Base Boat

Shower w/Bottom

59616

1.00

17.70

120.00

2.84

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

2.20

4.2

262CRBaseBoat

Top,ShowerMarble

59619

1.00

NA

3.00

0.26

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

NA

0.1

266

BR Super Sport

Lid, AnchorStorage

43524

1.00

2.50

16.00

0.26

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.6

266

BRSuperSport

Lid, Ladder

43552

1.00

2.50

19.00

0.46

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.7

266 CC with

Liner

Lid, AnchorStorage

20543

1.00

2.34

20.00

0.46

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.7

266 CC with

Liner

Lid, Fuel Tank

20570

1.00

4.00

32.50

0.75

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.50

1.1

266

CC with

Liner

Lid,

Ladder

43516

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

266CC with Liner

Helm

43556

1.00

8.40

52.50

1.31

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.00

1.9

266 CC with

Liner

Lid,

Ski Locker

43563

1.00

2.40

14.70

0.36

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.5

266CC with

Liner

Seat Base

59474

1.00

12.40

75.80

1.82

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.50

2.7

266CC with

Liner

Wetbar

60610

1.00

2.00

12.60

0.30

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.4

266CC with Liner

Wetbar

60629

1.00

1.84

10.75

0.27

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.4

288 BR

Lid, Ladder

43570

1.00

2.00

17.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

288 BR

Door,

Head Hatch

59060

1.00

2.00

16.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.6

288 BR

Sundeck

59362

1.00

16.50

92.40

2.62

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

2.00

3.3

288 BR

Door,

Head

59364

1.00

3.40

30.00

0.59

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.40

1.1

288 BR

Head Comp

Liner

59365

1.00

15.34

91.40

2.23

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.90

3.2

288 BR

Helm

59366

1.00

11.00

58.80

1.64

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.40

2.1

288 BR

Door,

Side Entry

59367

1.00

4.70

8.40

0.28

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.60

0.3

290 CR Base Boat

Lid, Ladder

43505

1.00

2.50

17.00

0.40

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.30

0.6

290 CR Base Boat

Shower w/Bottom

43568

1.00

12.50

125.00

2.81

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.50

4.4

290 CR Base Boat

Helm

61317

1.00

18.70

68.25

2.13

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

2.30

2.4

290 CR Base Boat

Motor Hatch

61318

1.00

8.20

91.40

2.04

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

1.00

3.2

290 CR Base Boat

Lid, Ladder

61319

1.00

2.00

19.00

0.45

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.20

0.7

290 CR Base Boat

180 BR

Shower Wall

61321

1.00

7.34

101.90

2.20

0.33

0.35

0.03

0.375

0.099

1

0.90

3.6

No Glass Small Parts

180 CC

No Glass Small Parts

Page 4 of 4

* -

fraction ofVOM (as styrene/MMA) that is emitted based on the amount available

in the material as applied.

---

Crownilne Boats,

Inc.

MACT

Compliance

Summary

Month*

Compliance Status

Sep-03

0.8

below

Oct-03

2.9

below

Nov-03

5.1

below

Dec-03

6.7

below

Jan-04

8.1

below

Feb-04

9.9

below

Mar-04

10.7

below

*

MACT Compliance Status is computed for 12-month period ending

on the date listed.

---

Crownllne Boats, Inc.

September 2003

MAci’

compliance

tern #

Operation & Application

Method

Productionresin -flowcoat

PUT1’Y, LAMENEXVBOND VERT STRK FILL (5 Ct

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE

1800

-

print

barrier/barriercoat

Non-atomized

RESIN, PRODUCTION (LOW STYRENE) AOl T36

Non-atomized

VINYLESTER,

ARMORGUARD BARRIERCOAT

Non.atomized

VINYLESTER, BLACK

Non-atomized

RESIN,

MARBLE

Non-atomized

GRANICOAT, BURNT AMBER

Non-atomized

RESIN, AME 4000

Non-atomized

RESIN,

PRODUCTION, MR12504

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE 2000- bulk print barrier/core matrix

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE 2000-low VOC

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE 1800-lowVOC

Non-atomized

BARRIER COAT,WHITE

Non-atomized

SUBTOTAL

Pionlented

del

coat

GELCOAT, CITRINE

atomized

GELCOAT,

OPAL LOWVOC

STYRENE

atomized

GELCOAT.

MOONSTONE LOW VOC

STYRENE

atomized

GELCOAT,

TANZANITE (PURPLE)

atomized

GELCOAT,

EMERALD

atomized

GELCOAT,

AMETHYST

atomized

GELCOAT,

MOONSTONE

atomized

GELCOAT,

NEW RUBY

atomized

GELCOAT,

OPAL

atomized

GELCOAT,

ONYX

atomized

GELCOAT, SAPPHIRE

(OBS)

atomized

GELCOAT, SPINEL WINE

atomized

GELCOAT,

AMBER

atomized

GELCOAT,

MOONROCI

atomized

ENAMEL,

WAXCOTE MOONSTONE

atomized

ENAMEL,

WAXCOTE OPAL

atomized

SUBTOTAL

Tooling

resin

-

flow

coat

PRIMER, DURATECH SURFACING

DYNALITE BODY FILLER 5 GAUBKT

PUTTY, LAMINEX

FILLEr 5 GAL CAN

EVERGLASS

ALPHA FILL

BLISTER

REPAIR

RESIN, AME

5000-C

PRIMER,

DURA TECH

CLEAR

XYCON RESIN

PIN

HOLE REPAIR

(ICING)

SUBTOTAL

Non-atomized

Non-atomized

Non-atomized

Non-atomized

Non-atomized

Non-atomized

Non-alomized

Non.atomized

Non-atomized

Non-atomized

35

0

0

0.0

26.0

26.0

23.2

0

0.0

35

20

33543.3

15.4

40.0

50.0

82.1

1262

0.8

35

0

4371836.2

1983.0

33.5

33.5

41.3

81834

52.3

35

5

36628.97

16.6

29.9

31.5

34.0

565

0.4

35

0

214.62

0.1

50.0

50.0

102.6

10

0.0

35

0

5936.84

2.7

33.0

33.0

39.9

107

0.1

34

0

14.7

0.0

28.0

28.0

27.4

0

0.0

35

0

12867.4

5.8

46.0

46.0

84.0

4g6

0.3

35

0

0

0.0

39.0

39.0

58.3

0

0.0

35

30

87312.12

39.6

40.0

57.1

97.3

3855

2.5

35

30

26254.881

11.9

25.0

35.7

33.4

398

0.3

35

20

132856.02

60.3

30.0

37.5

42.7

2571

1.6

36

0

0

0.0

31.7

31.7

36.4

0

0.0

4707815

2135

91099

58.2

28

20

25734.8

11.7

40.0

50.0

147.6

1723

1.1

28

5

10642.8

4.8

29.9

31.5

57.1

276

0.2

28

0

1637.58

0.7

50.0

50.0

184.6

137

0.1

28

30

62113.38

28.2

40.0

57.1

178.6

5032

3.2

28

30

0

0.0

25.0

35.7

57.1

0

0.0

28

20

0

0.0

30.0

37.5

73.5

0

0.0

100129

45

7168

0.00

33

0

29597.04

13.4

40.4

40.4

217.9

2925

1.9

33

0

27794.25

12.6

28.4

28.4

120.8

1523

1.0

33

0

324043.83

147.0

27.8

27.8

116.5

17124

10.9

33

0

539.55

0.2

40.9

40.9

222.8

55

0.0

33

0

8736.75

4.0

42.1

42.1

233.9

927

0.6

33

0

23743.17

10.8

40.0

40.0

214.7

2312

1.5

33

0

179617.68

81.5

37.3

37.3

191.0

15559

9.9

33

0

25279.65

11.5

40.1

40.1

215.6

2472

1.6

33

0

47911.05

21.7

38.6

38.6

202.3

4395

2.8

33

0

23689.71

10.7

42.2

42.2

234.8

2523

1.6

33

0

43.56

0.0

42.9

42.9

241.4

5

0.0

33

0

9518.85

4.3

41.2

41.2

225.6

974

0.6

33

0

870.21

0.4

43.1

43.1

243.3

96

0.1

33

0

16237.98

7.4

41.8

41.8

231.1

1702

1.1

33

0

9999

4.6

27.7

27.7

116.0

526

0.3

33

0

2834.37

1.3

28.5

28.5

121.7

156

0.1

730467

331.3

53274

34.1

159

2135

790

137

159

2005

-482

76

159

23370

-6247

73

159

39

16

140

159

630

297

147

159

1712

600

135

159

12954

2605

120

159

1823

649

136

159

3455

940

127

159

1709

815

148

159

3

2

152

159

687

287

142

159

63

33

153

159

1171

531

145

159

721

-195

73

159

204

-48

77

52681

593

54

21

-6

72

54

0

0

44

54

158

144

191

54

6

-5

13

54

936

-224

76

64

24

12

150

54

0

0

69

54

1

1

170

54

92

-23

76

55

0

0

112

1238

-101

MACT

Model Point

HAP

HAP

HAP

Required

Percent

Mass Used

Mass Used

Actual

HAP

Value

Emissions

ofTolal

HAPLimit

HAP

Emissions

Emissions

Application

HAP

Filler

Mi

Mi

HAP

without

PVi

Mi”PVi

HAP

Factor

Limit

& HAP

Percent

(Ib/yr)

(Mg)

filler

(kg

HAP/Mg)

(kg

HAP)

Emissions

(kg

Hap/Mg)

(kg HAP)

Limit

of HAP

Difference

Limit

Production resin

-

soraynun

SPRAYCORE 1800

-

print

barrier/barriercoat

atomized

VINYLESTER,ARMORGUARD BARRIERCOAT

atomized

VINYLESTER, BLACK

atomized

SPRAYCORE 2000

-

bulk printbarrier/core matrix

atomized

SPRAYCORE 2000

-

low VOC

alomized

SPRAYCORE 1800 -lowVOC

atomized

SUBTOTAL

40009

59622

62529

62534

90032

90067

90077

93049

93050

94015

94057

94058

94084

59622

62534

90032

94015

94057

94058

62019

62535

62604

90038

90039

90041

90044

90046

90048

90053

90055

90056

90057

90058

91035

91036

40005

40051

40067

59274

59283

59495

59698

62020

90072

94071

46

0

0

50

46

707

555

178

46

91219

-9385

90

46

764

-199

74

46

4

6

223

46

124

-16

87

45

0

0

61

46

268

227

185

46

0

0

127

46

1822

2033

212

46

548

-150

73

46

2772

-201

93

47

0

0

77

98230

-7130

46

537

1187

321

46

222

53

124

46

34

103

401

46

1296

3736

388

46

0

0

124

46

0

0

160

2059

5078

39

0

861.208

0.4

32.7

32.7

39.1

15

0.0

39

49

0

0.0

18.0

35.3

23.7

0

0.0

39

60

6459.03

2.9

30.0

75.0

103.3

303

0.2

39

5

230.08

0.1

15.0

15.8

7.1

I

0.0

39

60

38216.25

17.3

20.0

50.0

41.1

712

0.5

39

65

998.062

0.5

25.0

71.4

80.9

37

0.0

39

0

0

0.0

32.0

32.0

37.2

0

0.0

39

0

42.5595

0.0

47.6

47.6

91.8

2

0.0

38

0

3752

1.7

33.3

33.3

40.7

69

0.0

39

40

0

0.0

30.0

50.0

61.6

0

0.0

50559

23

1138

0.7

---

Production

resin

-

moray gun

SPRAYCORE 1800

-

print barrier/barrier

coat

atomized

VINYLESTER, ARMORGUARD BARRIERCOAT

atomized

VINYLESTER, BLACK

atomized

SPRAYCORE 2000-bulk

print barrier/corematrix

atomized

SPRAYCORE2000- low VOC

atomized

SPRAYCORE 1800-low VOC

atomized

SUBTOTAL

Pigmented gel coat

GELCOAT, CITRINE

atomized

GELCOAT, OPAL

LOWVOC

STYRENE

atomized

GELCOAT, MOONSTONE

LOW VOC S1YRENE

atomized

GELCOAT, TANZANITE

(PURPLE)

atomized

GELCOAT, EMERALD

atomized

GELCOAT, AMETHYST

atomized

GELCOAT, MOONSTONE

atomized

GELCOAT, NEW RUBY

atomized

GELCOAT, OPAL

atomized

GELCOAT, ONYX

atomized

GELCOAT, SAPPHIRE (OBS)

atomized

GELCOAT, SPINEL

WINE

atomized

GELCOAT, AMBER

atomized

GELCOAT,

MOONROCK

atomized

ENAMEL,

WAXCOTE MOONSTONE

atomized

ENAMEL, WAXCOTE OPAL

atomized

SUBTOTAL

28

20

13852.3

6.3

40.0

50.0

147.6

928

28

5

7173.6

3.3

29.9

31.5

57.1

186

28

0

256.76

0.1

50.0

50.0

184.6

21

28

30

39119.64

17.7

40.0

57.1

178.6

3169

28

30

0

0.0

25.0

35.7

57.1

0

28

20

0

0.0

30.0

37.5

73.5

_____________________

60402

27

33

0

29052.54

13,2

40.4

40.4

217.9

2871

1.9

33

0

32704.65

14.8

28.4

28.4

120.8

1792

1.2

33

0

365059.59

165.6

27.8

27.8

116.5

19291

12.6

33

0

536.58

0.2

40.9

40.9

222.8

54

0.0

33

0

8573.4

3.9

42.1

42.1

233.9

910

0.6

33

0

24785.64

11.2

40.0

40.0

214.7

2414

1.6

33

0

154241.01

70.0

37.3

37.3

191.0

13361

8.7

33

0

26478.54

12.0

40.1

40.1

215.6

2589

1.7

33

0

38473.38

17.5

38.6

38.6

202.3

3530

2.3

33

0

24915.33

11.3

42.2

42.2

234.8

2654

1.7

33

0

43.56

0.0

42.9

42.9

241.4

5

0.0

33

0

9507.96

4.3

41.2

41.2

225.6

973

0.6

33

0

86625

0.4

43.1

43.1

243.3

96

0.1

33

0

17255.7

7.8

41.8

41.8

231.1

1809

1.2

33

0

10825.65

4.9

27.7

27.7

116.0

570

0.4

33

0

2888.82

1.3

28.5

28.5

121.7

159

0.1

746209

338.5

53076

34.5

46

289

639

46

150

36

46

5

16

46

816

2353

46

0

0

159

2095

776

159

2359

-567

159

26329

-7038

159

39

16

159

618

291

159

1788

626

159

11124

2237

159

1910

680

159

2775

755

159

1797

857

159

3

2

159

686

287

159

62

33

159

1245

564

159

781

-211

159

208

.49

53817

-741

Crownhine Boats, Inc.

Oàtobár-2003

MACT

Compliance

Item #

Operation & Application

Method

(Ib/yr)

(Mg)

MACT

Model Point

HAP

HAP

HAP

Required

Percent

Mass Used

Mass

Used

Actual

HAP

Value

Emissions

of Total

HAP Limit

HAP

Emissions

Emissions

Application

HAP

Filler

Mi

Mi

HAP

without

PVi

Mi’PVi

HAP

Factor

Limit

& HAP

Percent

Production resin

-

flowcoat

PUTTY,

LAMENEX

VBOND

VERT STRK FILL (5Ct

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE 1800

-

print barrier/barriercoat

Non-atomized

RESIN, PRODUCTION (LOW STYRENE) AOl T36

Non-atomized

VINYLESTER,

ARMORGUARD BARRIERCOAT

Non.atomized

VINYLESTER,

BLACK

Non-atomized

RESIN, MARBLE

Non-atomized

GRANICOAT,BURNT AMBER

Non-atomized

RESIN, AME 4000

Non-atomized

RESIN, PRODUCTION,

MR12504

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE 2000

-

bulk print barrier/core matrix

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE2000- low VOC

Non-atomized

SPRAYCORE 1800

-

low VOC

Non-atomized

BARRIER COAT,WHITE

Non-atomized

SUBTOTAL

filler

(kg HAP/Mg)

(kg

HAP)

Emissions

(kg Hap/Mg)

(kg HAP)

Limit

of HAP

Difference

Limit

35

0

0

0.0

26.0

26.0

23.2

0

0.0

35

20

33893.3

15.4

40.0

50.0

82.1

1262

0.8

35

0

4349486.4

1972.9

33.5

33.5

41.3

81416

53.0

35

5

41067.39

18.6

29.9

31.5

34.0

634

0.4

35

0

214.62

0.1

50.0

50.0

102.6

10

0.0

35

0

5446.84

2.5

33.0

33.0

39.9

99

0.1

34

0

14.7

0.0

28.0

28.0

27.4

0

0.0

35

0

13798.4

6.3

46.0

46.0

84.9

531

0.3

35

0

0

0.0

39.0

39.0

58.3

0

0.0

35

30

87312.12

39.6

40.0

57.1

97.3

3855

2.5

35

30

28189.401

12.8

25.0

35.7

33.4

427

0.3

35

20

145473.52

66.0

30.0

37.5

42.7

2816

1.8

36

0

0

0.0

31.7

31.7

36.4

0

0.0

4704897

2134

91050

59.3

0.6

0.1

0.0

2.1

0.0

______________________

0

0.0

4304

0.00

40009

59622

62529

62534

90032

90067

90077

93049

93050

94015

94057

94058

94084

59622

62534

90032

94015

94057

94058

62019

62535

62604

90038

90039

90041

90044

90046

90048

90053

90055

90056

90057

90058

91035

91036

40005

40051

40067

59274

59283

59495

59698

62020

90072

94071

46

0

0

46

707

555

46

90753