ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March 4, 2004
IN THE MATTER OF:
PROPOSED NEW AND UPDATED RULES
FOR MEASUREMENT AND NUMERICAL
SOUND EMISSIONS STANDARDS
AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL. ADM. CODE
901 and 910
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
R03-9
(Rulemaking - Noise)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by G.T. Girard):
On, February 20, 2003, the Board offered this proposed rulemaking for public comment.
The proposal updated regulations governing noise found in 35 Ill. Adm. Code Subtitle H,
pursuant to Sections 27 and 28 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act, (415 ILCS 5/27-
5/28 (2002) and 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 102 Subpart B. After two hearings the Board proceeded
to first notice with this rulemaking on July 10, 2003. First notice was published on July 25,
2002. 27 Ill. Reg. 11908.
On October 16, 2003, the Board issued an order addressing five public comments. Those
comments were from Scot Forge (PC 3), Vaughn and Bushnell Manufacturing (PC 4), Intermet
Decatur Foundry (PC 7), Boughton Trucking and Materials Inc. (PC 6) (Boughton), and the
Illinois Association of Aggregate Producers (Association) (PC 5). Boughton and the Association
requested a third hearing and the Board agreed to hold a third hearing.
The remaining three commenters sought changes in site-specific regulations governing
the respective companies. The Board acknowledged comments, however the Board noted that
most of the relevant sections had not been noticed as a part of the first-notice required under the
Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/1-1
et. seq.
(2002)) (APA). Therefore, the
newly suggested changes to relevant sections would require first-notice publication before the
Board could proceed. To avoid undue delay in this proceeding, the Board encouraged the
companies to petition the Board for site-specific changes in future rulemaking dockets.
On February 9, 2004, the Board held a third hearing. Scot Forge presented testimony in
support of a change in the site-specific rule currently applicable to Scot Forge. Tr3 at 5-10. Scot
Forge also agreed to examine the opinion and order (Atlas Forging Division of Scot Forge R83-
34 (Dec. 30, 1984)) that granted the site-specific rule and to provide additional comment on the
applicability and need for a site-specific change.
The hearing officer noted at hearing, that prior to the hearing, the Association notified the
hearing officer that the Association did not receive notice of the hearing and would be unable to
attend. Tr.3 at 30-31. The hearing officer stated that a review of the Board’s records indicated
that notice had not been sent to the Association.
Id
. Instead of seeking a postponement of the
third hearing, the Association was willing to accommodate the Board and supply only written
comments if sufficient time could be given.
Id
.
2
Under the APA a rule cannot be adopted or filed more than one year after the first-notice
period begins. 5 ILCS 100/5-40(e)
.
(2002). If the Board gives the Association sufficient time to
prepare written comments, the Board is unlikely to be able to complete this rulemaking under the
APA timeframes. Therefore, the Board will need to restart the APA procedures for this proposal.
The Board finds that administrative economy supports including the site-specific changes
in the new first notice. Prior to publishing the proposal for a second first notice, the Board will
hold two additional hearings, to ensure that a complete record is developed. The additional
hearings and the second first notice will allow companies seeking a site-specific change to fully
participate and to allow the Association the opportunity to testify. The hearing officer is directed
to set those hearings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
adopted the above order on March 4, 2004, by a vote of 5-0.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
