REcEwE~
CLERKS OFFICE
IN THE MATTER OF:
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM LEAKING
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (PROPOSED
NEW 35 ILL.ADM.CODE 734)
)
R04-23
(Rulemaking-Land)
MAR 082004
STATE.OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Board
NOTICE
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Ste. 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Overnight Mail)
See Attached Service List
Marie Tipsord, Hearing Officer
Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Ste 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Overnight Mail)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of
the Clerk of the Pollution Control Board the Errata Sheet and Prefiled Testimony
of Doug Clay, Hernando Albarracin, Doug Oakley, Brian Bauer and Harry Chappel
of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, a copy of which is
herewith served upon you.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
By:
Kyle Romin~
z~
.3-.’
Assistant Counsel
DATE: March 05,. 2004
Agency. File
#:
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Ave. East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
THIS PILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
R04-23
LEAKiNG U1~IDERGROUNDSTORAGE
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
TANKS (PROPOSED NEW
35
ILL
)
ADM. CODE 734)
)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S FIRST ERRATA SHEET
TO ITS PROPOSAL FOR THE ADDITION OF 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 734
NOW COMES the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois EPA”), by
and through its attorneys Kyle Rominger and Gina Roccaforte, and submits this First
Errata Sheet to its proposal for the addition of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 734. The Illinois EPA
proposes the following amendments to the text ofthe rules submitted in its proposal to
the Board dated January 1, 2004:
1. Amend Section 734.135(e) to thefollowing to replace “Section 734.715(d)” with
“Section 734.715(c) or (d)” in the first sentence. A form addressingsite ownership is not
necessaryfor sites subject to Section 734.715(c).
e)
Except in the case ofsites subject to Section 734.715(c) or (d) ofthis Part,
reports documenting the completion ofcorrective action at a site must
contain a form addressing site ownership. At a minimum, the form shall
identify the land use limitations proposed for the site, if land use
limitations are proposed; the site’s common address, legal description, and
real estate tax/parcel index number; and the names and addresses ofall
title holders ofrecord ofthe site or any portion ofthe site. The form shall
also contain the following certification, by original signature, ofall title
holders ofrecord ofthe site or any portion ofthe site, or the agent(s) of
such person(s):
I hereby affirm that I have reviewed the attached report entitled
_______
and dated
__________,
and that I accept the terms and
conditions set forth therein, including any land use limitations, that
apply to property I own. I further affirm that I have no objectionto
the recording of a No Further Remediation Letter containing the
terms and conditions identified in the report upon the property I
own.
2.
Amend Subpart A by adding the following Section 734.140.
Section 734.140
Development ofRemediation Objectives
The owner or operator shall propose remediation objectives for the applicable indicator
contaminants in accordancewith 35 Ill. Adm. Code 742.
BOARD NOTE: Several provisions ofthis Part require the owneror operator to
determine whether contamination exceeds the most stringent Tier 1 remediation
objectives of35 Ill. Adm. Code 742. Please note that these requirements do not limit the
owner’s or operator’s ability to use Tier 2 or Tier 3 remediation objectives in accordance
with 35 Ill. Adm. Code 742.
a)
The owner or operatormay develop remediation objectives at any time
during site investigation or corrective action. Prior to developing Tier2 or
Tier 3 remediation objectives the owner or operator shall propose the
development ofremediation objectives in the appropriate site investigation
plan or corrective action plan. Documentation ofthe development of
remediation objectives shall be included as a part ofthe appropriate plan
or report.
b)
Any owner or operator intending to seek payment from the Fund shall,
prior to the development ofTier 2 orTier 3 remediation objectives,
propose the costs for such activities in the appropriate budget. The costs
should be consistent with the eligible and ineligible costs listed at Sections
734.625 and 734.630 ofthis Part and the maximum payment amounts set
forth in Subpart H ofthis Part.
c)
Upon the Agency’s approval of a plan that includes the development of
remediation objectives, the owner or operator shall proceed to develop
remediation objectives in accordance with the plan.
d)
If, following the approval of any plan or associated budget that includes
the development ofremediation objectives, an owner oroperator
determines that a revised plan or budget is necessary, the owner or
operator shall submit, as applicable, an amended plan or associated budget
to the Agency for review. The Agency shall review and approve, reject, or
require modification ofthe amended plan or budget in accordance with
Subpart E ofthis Part.
e)
Notwithstanding any requirement under this Part for the submission ofa
plan orbudget that includes the development ofremediation objectives, an
owner or operator may proceed to develop remediation objectives prior to
the submittal or approval ofan otherwise requiredplan or budget.
However, any such plan orbudget shall be submitted to the Agency for
2
review and approval, rejection, or modification in accordance with the
procedures contained in Subpart E ofthis Part prior to receiving payment
for any related costs or the issuance ofa No Further Remediation Letter.
BOARD NOTE: Owners or operators proceeding under subsection (e) of
this Section are advised that they maynot be entitled to full payment;
Furthermore, applications forpayment must be submitted no later than one
year after the date the Agency issues a No Further Remediation Letter.
See Subpart F ofthis Part.
3. Amend Section 734.210(h)(1)(B) to thefollowing to add a sentence at the end that
allows the Illinois EPA to require more than two excavationfloor samplesfrom below
underground storage tanks with a volume of 15,000 gallons or more. The prescribed two
floor samples may be inadequate to determine whether the soil below such larger tanks
exceeds the applicable remediation objectives.
B)
Two samples shall be collected from the excavation floor
below eachUST with a volume of 1,000 gallons or more.
One sample shall be collected from the excavation floor
below eachUST with a volume ofless than 1,000 gallons.
~~~
samples shall be collected from locations
representative ofsoil that is the most contaminated as a
result ofthe release. Ifareas ofcontamination cannotbe
identified, the samples shall be collected from below each
end ofthe UST if its volume is 1,000 gallons ormore, and
from below the center ofthe UST if its volume is less than
1,000 gallons. The Agency may require the collection of
more than two samples from the excavation floor below
USTs with a volume of 15,000 gallon or more.
4. Amend Section 734.210(h)(1)(D) to the following to allow the Illinois EPA to require
more than
two
baclg’ull samplesfor larger undergroundstorage tanks, and, for the
purposes ofconsistency, to mirror the tanksize delineations in Section 734.210(h)(1)(B).
D)
Ifbackfill is returned to the excavation, one representative
sample ofthe backfill shall be collected for each UST with
a volume ofless than 1,000 gallons and two representative
samples ofthe backfill shall be collected for each UST with
a volume of 1,000 gallons ormore. The Agency may
require the collection ofmore than two representative
samples ofthe backfill for each UST with a volume of
15,000 gallon or more.
5. Amend Section 734.215(d) to the following by removing “a copy ofthe eligibility and
deductibility determination ofthe OSFMand”from the second sentence so an owner’s or
3
operator’s ability to submit afree product removal budget in a timely manner is not
dependantupon obtaining an eligibility and deductibility determinationfrom the OSFM
d)
Any owner or operator intending to seek payment from the Fund shall,
prior to conducting free productremoval activities more than 45 days after
the confirmation ofthe presence offree product, submit to the Agency a
free product removal budget with the corresponding free productremoval
plan. The budget shall include, but shall not be limited to, an estimate of
all costs associated with the development, implementation, and completion
of the free product removal plan, excluding handling charges. The budget
should be consistent with the eligible and ineligible costs listed in Sections
734.625 and 734.630 ofthis Part and the maximum payment amounts set
forth in Subpart H ofthis Part. As part ofthe budget the Agency may
require a comparison between the costs ofthe proposed method offree
product removal and other methods offree product removal.
6. Amend thefirst sentence ofSection 734.310 to thefollowing by replacing “Section”
with “Part”.
The investigation ofthe release shall proceed in three stages as set forth in this Part. If,
after the completion ofany stage, the extent ofthe soil and groundwater contamination
exceeding the most stringent Tier 1 remediation objectives of35 Ill. Adm. Code 742 for
the applicable indicator contaminants as a result ofthe release has been defined, the
owner or operator shall cease investigation and proceed with the submission ofa site
investigation completion report in accordance with Section 734.330 ofthis Part.
7. Amend the Board Notefollowing Section 734.310(e) to thefollowing to reference
subsection (e) insteadofsubsection (d).
BOARD NOTE: Owners oroperators proceeding under subsection (e) of
this Section are advised that they maynot be entitled to full payment.
Furthermore, applications for payment must be submitted no later than one
year after the date the Agency issues a No Further Remediation Letter.
See Subpart F ofthis Part.
8. Amend Sections 734.315(a)(1)(D) and (E) to thefollowing to add the word “be” as
thefourth word in each subsection.
D)
One boring shall be drilled 15 feet out from the location of
each boring drilled pursuant to Section 734.2 l0(h)(2)(A) of
this Part that produced one ormore samples exceeding the
most stringent Tier 1 remediation objectives of35 Iii. Adm.
Code 742 forthe applicable indicator contaminants. If a
boring cannot be drilled at a distance of 15 feet, it shall be
drilled at a lesser distance that is as close as practicable to
the 15-foot distance. Each boring shall be drilled to a depth
4
of30 feet, or until groundwater orbedrock is encountered,
whichever is less.
E)
One boring shall be drilled 15 feet out from the location of
eachboring drilled pursuant to Section 734.2 lO(h)(2)(B) of
this Part that produced one or more samples exceeding the
most stringent Tier 1 remediation objectives of35 Ill. Adm.
Code 742 forthe applicable indicator contaminants. Ifa.
boring cannot be drilled at a distance of 15 feet, it shall be
drilled at a lesser distance that is as close as practicable to
the 15-foot distance. Each boring shall be drilled to a depth
of 15 feet, or until groundwater orbedrock is encountered,
whichever is less.
9. Amend Section 734.315(a)(2) by adding the following Section 734.315(a)(2)(E).
E)
As a part ofthe groundwater investigation an in-situ
hydraulic conductivity test shall be performed in the first
fully saturated layerbelow the water table. Ifmultiple
water bearing units are encountered, an in-situ hydraulic
conductivity test shall be performed on each such unit.
i)
Wells used for hydraulic conductivity testing shall
be constructed in a manner that ensures the most
accurate results.
ii)
The screen must be contained within the saturated
zone.
10. Amend Section 734.320(b)(3)(H) to thefollowing to replace “For soil boring logs”
with “For soil borings.”
H)
For soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells
installed as part ofthe Stage 1 site investigation, soil boring
logs and monitoring well construction diagrams meeting
the requirements of Sections 734.425 and 734.430 ofthis
Part; and
11. Amend Section 734.325(b)(2)(G) to thefollowing to replace “For soil boring logs”
with “For soil borings.”
G)
For soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells
installed as part ofthe Stage 2 site investigation, soil boring
logs and monitoring well construction diagrams meeting
the requirements of Sections 734.425 and 734.430 ofthis
Part; and
5
12. In conjunction with the addition ofSection 734.140 above, amend Subpart D by
deletingSection 734.410. In addition, amend the reference to “Section 734.410” in
Section 734.415(b) to “Section 734.140”.
13. Amend Section 734.415(b) to thefollowing by adding “most stringent”prior to
“objectives or detection levels” to ensureproperpractical quantitation limits in sample
analyses.
b)
The analytical methodology used for the analysis ofindicator
contaminants shall have a practical quantitation limit at orbelow the most
stringent objectives or detection levels set forth in 35 Iii. Adm. Code 742
or determined by the Agency pursuant to Section 734.4 10 ofthis Part.
14. Amend Section 734.6050) to thefollowing to remove references to budgets and
budget amendments becausethose documents must be submittedprior to the issuance of
a No Further Remediation Letter.
j)
All applications for payment ofcorrective action costs shall be submitted
no later than one year after the date the Agency issues a No Further
Remediation Letter pursuant to Subpart G ofthis Part. For releases for
which the Agency issued a No Further Remediation Letter prior to the
effective date ofthis subsection (j), all applications forpayment shall be
submitted no later than one year after the effective date ofthis subsection
(j).
15. Amend Sections 734.625(a)(17) and 734.840(b) by replacing “$10,000persite” with
“$10,000peroccurrence.”
16. Amend Section 734. 630(gg) to thefollowing to add “costs associated with the
replacement ofconcrete, asphalt, orpaving in accordancewith Section 734.625(a)(17) of
this Part,
“.
Some owners and operators may not replace concrete, asphalt, orpaving
until after they receive a No Further Remediation Letter.
gg)
Costs incurred after receipt ofa No Further Remediation Letter for the
occurrence for which the No Further Remediation Letter was received,
except costs incurred for MTBE remediation pursuant to Section
734.405(i)(2) ofthis Part, costs associated with the replacement of
concrete, asphalt, orpaving in accordance with Section
734.625(a)(17)
of
this Part, monitoring well abandonment costs, county recorder orregistrar
oftitles fees forrecording the No Further Remecliation Letter, and costs
associated with seeking payment from the Fund;
17. Amend Section 734. 630(yy) to thefollowing to remove “or.sample analysis.” The
illinois EPApaysfor the analysis of a second sample when thefirst sample cannot be
used due to improper collection, transportation, or analysis.
6
yy)
Costs associated with sample collection or transportation required as a
result ofimproperly collected, transported, or analyzed laboratory
samples;
18. Amend Section 734.640(b) to thefollowing so it matches Section 732.608(b).
b)
The Agency will determine, based on volume or number oftanks, which
method of apportionment will be most favorable to the owner or operator.
The Agency will notify the owner or operator ofsuch determination in
writing.
19. Amend Section 734.820 to the following to provide maximum payment amountsfor
direct-push platform drilling conductedfor injection purposes (e.g., for the injection of
oxygen releasing compounds as part ofan alternative technology) andfor recovery well
installation, and to increase the maximum payment -amountfor well abandonment.
Section 734.820
Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Payment for costs associated with drilling, well installation, and well abandonment shall
not exceed the amounts set forth in this Section.
.
-
a)
Payment for costs associated with eachround ofdrilling shall not exceed
the following amounts. Such costs shall include, but not be limited to,
those associated with mobilization, drilling labor, decontamination, and
drilling for the purposes of soil sampling orwell installation.
Type ofDrilling.
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
greater of$23.00 per foot or $1,500.00
Direct-push platform
-
for sampling or other
greater of$18.00 per foot or $1,200.00
non-injection purposes
-
-
for injection purposes
greater of$15.00 per foot or $1,200.00
b)
Payment for costs associated with the installation ofmonitoring wells,
excluding drilling, shall not exceed the following amounts. Such costs
shall include, but not be limited to, those associated with well construction
and development.
Type ofBorehole
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
$16.50/foot (well length)
Direct-push platform
-
$1 2.50/foot (well length)
c)
Payment for costs associated with the installation ofrecovery wells,
excluding drilling, shall not exceed the following amounts. Such costs
7
shall include, but not be limited to, those associated with well construction
and development.
Well Diameter
Maximum Total Amount
4 or 6 inches
$25.00/foot (well length)
8 inches or greater
$41 .00/foot (well length)
d)
Payment for costs associated with the abandonment ofmonitoring wells
shall not exceed $10.00 per foot ofwell.length.
-
20. Amend Section 734.845(b) to thefollowing to removefield work andfield oversight
from subsection (b)(1), change “$3,200.00” to “$1,600.00” in subsection (b)(1), and add
a new subsection (b)(2). These changes are made so that consultingfees are reimbursed
in the same mannerfor all ofthe site investigation stages.
b)
Site Investigation. Payment ofcosts for professional consulting services
associated with site investigation activities conducted pursuant to Subpart
C of this Part shall not exceed the following amounts:
1)
Payment forcosts associated with Stage I site investigation
preparation shall not exceed a total of $1,600.00.
2)
Payment forcosts associated with Stage 1 field work and field
oversight shall not exceed $500.00 per half-day. The number of
half-days
shall not exceed the following:
A)
One half-day for everyfour soil borings, or fraction
thereof, drilled as part ofthe Stage 1 site investigation but
not used for the installation ofmonitoring wells. Borings
in which monitoring wells are installed shall be included in
subsection (b)(2)(B) ofthis Section instead ofthis
subsection (b)(2)(A); and
B)
One half-dayfor each monitoring well installed as part of
the Stage 1 site investigation.
3)
Payment for costs associated with the preparation and submission
ofStage 2 site investigation plans shall not exceed a total of
$3,200.00.
4)
Payment for costs associated with Stage 2 fieldwork and field
oversight shall not exceed $500.00 per half-day. The numberof
half-days shall not exceed the following:
-
A)
One half-day for every four soil borings, or fraction
thereof, drilled as part ofthe Stage 2 site investigation but
8
not used for the installation ofmonitoring wells. Borings
in which monitoring wells are installed shall be included in
subsection (b)(4)(B) ofthis Section instead ofthis
subsection (b)(4)(A); and
B)
Onehalf-day for each monitoring well installed as part of
the Stage 2 site investigation.
5)
Payment for costs associated with the preparation and submission
of Stage 3 site investigation plans shall not exceed a total of
$3,200.00.
-
6)
Payment for costs associated with Stage 3 field work and field
oversight shall not exceed $500.00 per half-day. The number of
half-days shall not exceed the following:
A)
One half-day for every four soil borings, or fraction
thereof, drilled as part ofthe Stage 3 site investigation but
not used for the installation ofmonitoring wells. Borings
in which monitoring wells are installed shall be included in
subsection (b)(6)(B) ofthis Section instead ofthis
subsection (b)(6)(A); and
B)
One half-dayfor eachmonitoring well installed as part of
the Stage 3 site investigation.
7)
Payment for costs associated with the preparation and submission
ofsite investigation completion reports shall not exceed a total of
-
$1,600.00.
21. Amend Section 734.845(c) to thefollowing by moving subsection (c)(3) to new
Section 734.845(d)(1) and adding Section 734.845(d) asfollows. These changes are
-
made to address consultingfees associated with the development of Tier 2 or Tier 3
remediation objectives.
c)
Corrective Action. Payment ofcosts forprofessional consulting services
associated with corrective action activities conducted pursuant to Subpart
C ofthis Part shall not exceed the following amounts:
1)
For conventional technology, payment for costs associated with the
preparation and submission ofcorrective action plans shall not
-
exceed a total of $5,120.00. For alternative technologies, payment
for costs shall be determined on a time and materials basis and
shall not exceed the amounts set forth in Section 734.850 ofthis
Part.
9
2)
Payment for costs associated with corrective action field work and
field oversight shall not exceed the following amounts:
A)
For conventional technology, a total of
$500.00
per half-
day, not to exceed one half-day for each 250 cubic yards, or
fraction thereof, ofsoil removed and disposed.
B)
For alternative technologies, payment for costs shall be
determined on a time and materials basis and shall not
exceed the amounts set forth in Section 734.850 ofthis
Part.
3)
Payment for costs associated with Environmental Land Use
Controls and Highway Authority Agreements used as institutional
controls pursuant to 35 Iii. Adm. Code 742 shall not exceed
$800.00 per Environmental Land Use Control or Highway
Authority Agreement.
d)
Development ofTier 2 or Tier
3
Remediation Objectives. Payment of
- -
costs forprofessional consulting services associated with the development
— -
ofTier 2 orTier 3 remediation objectives in accordance with 35 Iii. Adm.
-
Code 742 shall not exceed the following amounts:
-
-
1)
Payment for costs associated with field work and field oversight
forthe devàlopment ofremediation objectives shall not exceed
$500.00
per half-day. The numberofhalf-days shall not exceed
-
the following:
A)
One half-day for every foursoil borings, or fraction
-
thereof, drilled solely for the purpose ofdeveloping
-
remediation
objectives. Borings in which monitoring wells
are
installed shall be included in subsection (d)(1)(B) of
this
Section instead ofthis subsection (d)(1)(A); and
.
B)
-
Onehalf-day for each monitoring well installed solely for
the purpose ofdeveloping remediation objectives.
2)
Excluding costs set forth in subsection (d)(1) ofthis Section,
-
payment for costs associated with the development ofTier 2 or
--
Tier 3 remediation objectives shall not exceed a total of$800.00.
-
10
22.
Amend Section 734.865 by replacing it in its entirety with thefollowing:
Section 734.865
Increase in Maximum Payment Amounts
The maximum payment amounts set forth in this Subpart H shall be adjusted annually by
an inflation factor determined by the annual Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National
Product as published by the U.S. Department ofCommerce in its Survey ofCurrent
Business.
a)
The inflation factor shall be calculated each year by dividing the latest
published annual Implicit Price Deflatorfor Gross National Product by the
annual Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National Product forthe previous
year.
The inflation factor shall be rounded to the nearest 1/100th. In no
case shall the inflation factorbe more than five percent in a single year.
b)
Adjusted maximum payment amounts shall become effective on July 1 of
each year and shall remain in effect through June 30 ofthe following year.
The first adjustment shall be made on July 1, 2006, by multiplying the
maximum
payment amounts set forth in this Subpart H by the applicable
- -
- -
inflation factor. Subsequent adjustments shall be made by multiplying the
latest adjusted maximum payment amounts by the latest inflation factor.
c)
The Agency shall post the inflation factors on its website no later than the
date they become effective. The inflation factors shall remain posted on
the website in subsequent years to aid in the calculation ofadjusted
maximum payment amounts.
d)
Adjusted maximum payment amounts shall be applied as follows:
1)
For costs approved by the Agency in writingprior to the date the
costs are incurred, the applicable maximum payments amounts
shall be the amounts in effect on the date the Agency received the
budget in which the costs were proposed. Once the Agency
--
approves a cost, the applicable maximum payment amount forthe
cost shall not be increased (e.g, by proposing the cost in a
subsequent budget).
—
2)
For costs not approved by the Agency in writing prior to the date
the costs are incurred, including, but not limited to, early action
costs, the applicable maximum payments amounts shall be the
amounts in effect on the date the costs were incurred.
3)
Owners and operators shall have the burden ofrequesting the
appropriate adjusted maximum payment amounts in budgets and
-
applications forpayment.
11
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
Kyle Romi~er
-
Assistant Counsel
Gina Roccaforte
~‘
Assistant Counsel
DATED:
3. ~f.
O&tL
1021 North Grand Avenue East
-
-
P.O.Box 19276
-
-
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217)782-5544
-
-
12
BEFORE THE ILLiNOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
R 04-23
-
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
TANKS (PROPOSED NEW 35 ILL.
)
ADM. CODE 734)
)
TESTIMONY OF DOUGLAS W. CLAY IN SUPPORT OF
THE ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO ADOPT
-
35 ILL. ADM. CODE 734
My name is Doug Clay. I am the manager ofthe Leaking Underground Storage
Tank (“LUST”) Section within the Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency. I have been in my current position since September of 1994. The
LUST Section is primarily responsible for reviewing the technical adequacy ofplans,
reports and associated budgets for the remediation ofreleases from underground storage
-
tanks regulated under Title XVI ofthe Environmental Protection Act (“Act”) and 35 Ill.
Adm. Code, Parts 731 and 732.
-
Prior to assuming my current position, Iwas the manager ofthe Disposal
Alternative Unit within the Permit Section ofthe Bureau ofLand. I have also worked in
the Permit Section in the Bureau ofWater. I have been employed at the Illinois EPA
since 1983 following the receipt of a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the
University ofIllinois. I have been a Registered Professional Engineer in Illinois since
1989. A copy ofmy resume is attached (Attachment 1).
-
Today I will be testifying in support ofthe proposed 35 Ill. Adm. Code, Part 734.
These amendments are the result of: (1) modification to the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act by Public Acts 92-0554 and 92-0735; (2) the need to reform the current
budget and reimbursement process; and (3) to clarify issues that have arisen since Part
732 was last amended. My testimony will provide a brief overview and focus on a
-
portion ofSubpart E, Subpart F, Subpart G and Appendices A and B.
Overview
—
The proposed Part 734 regulations are identical in substance to the
proposed amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732, except as identified in testimony
provided by Agency personnel. They apply to underground storage tank releases of
petroleum reported to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency on or after June 24,
2002, and to releases that were reported prior to June 24, 2002, forwhich the owner or
operatorhas elected to proceed in accordance with Part 734. These regulations are
intended to streamline the leaking underground storage tank remediation process, clarify
- -
-
remediation requirements and most notably reform the budget and reimbursement
-
process. The new budget and reimbursement process would eliminate the majority of
budgets and reimbursement packages submitted based on a time and material basis and
-
replace them with submittals based on unit rates and lump sums for specific tasks
established in the regu1ations~We believe that this will streamline the approval of
budgets and the processing ofreimbursement claims. Currently, there is a tremendous
-
amount oftime spent reviewingbudgets and reimbursement packages. Furthermore, the
majority ofplan and report denials, amendments to plans and reports submitted by
consultants, and appeals before the Illinois Pollution Control Board are related to budget
and reimbursement issues, as opposed to technical issues. The Agency believes that the
proposed amendments will allow more efficient use ofBoard and Agency resources,
improve consistency, lower remediation costs, expedite cleanups and allow tank owners
and operators to be reimbursed in a more timely manner The proposed costs in Subpart
2
-
H were developed with input from the consulting industry and other trade organizations
plus nearly 15 years ofAgency experience administering the leaking underground storage
tank reimbursement program, and are generally consistent with the rates we currently
approve for reimbursement. Over the past 15 years, the Agency has approved over one-
half billion dollars for reimbursement. This involved reviewing over 12,800 budgets and
-
over 18,300 applications forpayments. In addition, it should be noted that ourcurrent
-
rates and the approach to the development ofour current rates have been upheld in Board
decisions.
In addition to the reimbursement changes, in Part 734 the Agency is proposing a
new three-stage approach to site investigation. Consultants originally suggested this new
approach to site investigation. The idea was to allow more site investigation work (Stage
1) to be- conduct~dafter early action activities and prior to submittal ofa site
-
investigation plan and budget (Stage 2) to the Agency. This would give consultants more
information to be used in the development oftheir Stage 2 site investigation plan. This
requires a fairly prescriptive approach-to Stage 1, since there is. no prior Agency approval
ofa plan or budget in Stage 1. Stage 2 would be the proposed plan to fully define the
extent ofcontamination on-site, and Stage 3 would be the plan to fully define the extent
ofcontamination off-site.
Subpart E
—
Review Procedures for Plans and Reports. This Subpart is identical
in substance to the proposed amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732, Subpart E. A table
showing the locations ofsimilar sections in Parts 732 and 734 is provided in the
Statement ofReasons forPart 734.
-
3
Subpart
F
—
Payments from the Fund. This Subpart is identical in substance to the
proposed amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732, Subpart F, except as identified in Doug
Oakley’s testimony. A table showing the locations ofsimilar sections in Parts 732 and
734 is provided in the Statement ofReasons forPart 734.
-
Subpart G
—
No Further Remediation Letters and Recording Requirements. This
Subpart is identical in substance to the proposed amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732,
Subpart G. A table showing the locations ofsimilar sections in Parts 732 and 734 is
provided in the Statement ofReasons for Part 734.
Appendix A
—
Indicator Contaminants. This Appendix is identical in substance to
the proposed amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732, Appendix A. A table showing the
locations ofsimilar appendices in Parts 732 and 734 is provided in the Statement of
Reasons forPart 734.
Appendix B
—
Additional Parameters. This appendix is identical in substance to
the proposed amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732, Appendix B. A table showing the
locations ofsimilar appendices in Parts 732 and 734 is provided in the Statement of
Reasons forPart 734.
4
-
Douglas
W.
Clay,
P.E.
Professional
1995 - Present
-
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
experience
Section Manager
-
• Responsible for managing the Leaking Underground Storage Tank
- Program in Illinois, which oversees the- cleanup of releases from
underground storage tanks throughout the state.
• Directlyand indirectly manager 42 staff and managers -
• Responsible for partial administration of the UST Fund, which is used to
reimburse of underground storage tank owners and operators.
-
1994
- 1995
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Section Manager (Acting)
• Responsible for managing the Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Program in Illinois, which oversees the cleanup of releases from
underground storage tanks throughout the state.
-
• Direötly and indirectly manager 42 staff and managers
• Responsible for partial administration of the UST Fund, which is used to
reimburse of underground storage tank owners and operators.
1990 - 1994
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Unit Manager
• Responsible for managing the Disposal Alternative Unit in the Bureau of
Land, Permit Section
• The unit reviews permit applications for solid and hazardous waste
treatment and storage facilities.
. -
1988 - 1990
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer IV
• Review permit applications for solid waste disposal and transfer facilities
in the Bureau of Land, Permit Section, Solid Waste Unit.
• Act as lead worker in the Solid Waste Unit.
1985 - 1988
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer Ill
-
• Review permit applications for sewage treatment plants, pump stations
and sewer connections.
1984- 1985
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer II
• Review permit applications for sewage treatment plants, pump stations
and sewer connections.
1983 - 1984
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer I
• Review permit applications for sewage treatment plants, pump stations
and sewer connections.
-
-
Education
1978 - 1982
University of Illinois
Champaign-Urbana
• Received a B.S. in Civil Engineering
-
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
R 04-023
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE )
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
TANKS (PROPOSED NEW 35 ILL.
)
ADM.C0DE734)
)
-
TESTIMONY OF HERNANDO ALBARRACIN iN SUPPORT OF
THE ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO ADOPT
35 ILL.ADM. CODE 734
-
My name is Hernando Albarracin. I am a Unit Manager in the Leaking Underground
Storage Tank (“LUST”) Section within the Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency. I have been in my current position since January 1996. Prior to assuming
my current position I was a permit reviewer in the Permit Section in the Bureau ofLand
-
beginning in April 1989. I received a B.S. in Mining Engineering in 1986 from Southern Illinois
University at Carbondale. My resume is attached. Today, I will be testifying in support ofnew
regulations proposed for 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 734, specifically Subparts A, B, C, and D.
Subpart A: General
Section 734.100
—
Applicability. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 734.100 (“Section 734.100”) is
based upon 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.100 (“Section 732.100”), except that Section 734.100 makes
Part 734 applicable to UST releases reported on or after June 24, 2002, the effective date of
Public Act 92-0554, and to persons receiving a corrective action order from the Office ofthe
State Fire Marshal on or after that date. The applicability dates ofSection 734.100 dovetail with
the applicability dates ofSection 732.100. Subsection 734.100(b), similar to proposed
subsection 732.100(e), notes that owners and operators with releases reported prior to June 24,
2002, may elect to proceed in accordancewith Part 734.
-
Section 734.105
—
Election to Proceed under Part 734. Section 734.105 is based upon
Section 732.101, and sets forth the procedural requirements for elections to proceed under Part
734. Subsection 734.105(c) requires an owner or operator electing to proceed under Part 734 to
submit a summary ofthe Part 734 requirements the owneror operator has already satisfied. This
summary is required to help the Illinois EPA determine which requirements ofPart 734 the
owner or operatorstill needs to complete. Subsection 734.105(e) notes that a person that has
already received a No Further Remediation Letter for a particular release may not elect to
proceed under Part 734 with respect to that release. The reason is that once the requirements of
the LUST Program are satisfied and the Illinois EPA issues a No Further Remediation Letter for
a release, the owner or operator cannot re-enter the LUST Program to address the release. If
additional remediation is desired, the owner or operator will need to enroll in the Illinois EPA’s
Site Remediation Program.
Section 734.110— Severability. Section 734.110 is identical to Section 732.102.
Section 734.115
—
Definitions. Section 734.115 is identical to Section 732.103. Please
refer to my testimony on that section.
Section 734.120
—
Incorporation by Reference. Section 734.120 is identical to Section
732.104. Please refer to my testimony on that section.
Section 734.125
—
Agency Authority to Initiate Investigative, Preventive, or Corrective
Action. Section 734.125 is identical to Section 732.105.
-
-
Section 734.130
—
Licensed Professional Engineer orLicensed Professional Geologist
-
Supervision. Section 734.100 is based upon Section 732.108. The difference is that Part 732
and High Priority Corrective Action Completion Reports are referenced in Section 732.108.
Section 734.135
—
Form and Delivery ofPlans, Budgets, and Reports~Signatures and
Certifications. Section 734.135 is based upon Section 732..! 10. In Part 734, the minimum map
2
requirements added in subsection 732.100(a) are found in Section 734.440.
In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet, Subsection 732.135(e) is amended to include
734.715(c).
Please refer to the Agency’s First Errata Sheet for additional information.
Section 734.140
—
Development ofRemediation Objectives. In the Agency’s First Errata
Sheet, Section 734.410 is moved to Section 734.140. The language in.Section.734.140 is
identical to Section 732.408. Additional language is added to clarify that the owner or operator
maypropose Tier 2 or Tier 3 remediation objectives in accordance with 35 Ill. Adm. Code 742,
and that remediation objectives may be developed at any time after early action. Please refer to
the Agency’s First Errata Sheet for additional information.
Subpart B: Early Action
Section 734.200
—
General. Section 734.200 is identical to Section 732.200. Please refer
to my testimony on that section.
Section 734.205
—
Agency Authority to Initiate. Section 734.205 is identical to Section
732.201.
Section 734.210
—
Early Action. Section 734.210 is identical to Section 732.202. Please
refer to my testimony on that section.
Please note that subsections 732.202(h)(1)(B) and (D) are amended in the Agency’s First
Errata Sheet. With these amendments the Agency is able to require additional floor or backfill
samples for tanks with a volume of 15,000 gallons or more if additional samples are needed to
help determine whether contamination is present in the subsurface. Please refer to the Agency’s
First Errata Sheet for additional information.
Section 734.2 15
—
Free Product Removal. Section 734.215 is identical to Section
732.203. Please refer to my testimony on that section.
3
-
Subsection 734.215(d) is amended in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet. The reference to a
copy ofthe eligibility and deductibility determination was removed to allow free product
removal to proceed without delay. Refer to the First Errata Sheet for additional information.
Section 734.220
—
Application for Payment ofEarly Action Costs. Section 734.220 is
identical to Section 732.204. Please refer to my testimony on~thatsection~
-
-
Subpart C: Site Investigation and Corrective Action
Section 734.300
—
General. Section 734.300 is based upon Section 732.300(a). Part 734
does not contain provisions corresponding to subsections 732.300(b) and (c), which provide an
alternative to site classification and classification-based remediation requirements, because Part
734 does not require site classification and classification-based remediation.
Section 734 305
—
Agency Authonty to Initiate Section 734 305 is identical to Section
732.301.
-
Section 734.310— Site Investigation—General. The objective of site investigation is to
define the three dimensional extent of soil and groundwater contamination as a result ofthe
release from the underground storage tank(s). The investigation ofthe release shall proceed in
three stages as set forth in Sections 734.315 through 734.325. The three-stage approach was
developed with input from the Consulting Engineers Council ofIllinois. If the extent of
contamination exceeding the applicable remediation objectives is fully defined after completing
any ofthe stages, the owner or operator must skip the remaining stages ofthe site investigation
—
and proceed directly to the submission of a site investigation completion report in accordance
with Section 734.330. Subsections 734.3 10(a) through (e) are based upon subsections
732.305(a) through (e), excluding subsection 732.305(c) which is not repeated due to its
redundancy with provisions in Subpart E.
-
4
Subsection 734.310(b) states that any owner or operator intending to seek payment from
the UST Fund shall, prior to conducting any site investigation activities, submit to the Agency a
site investigation budget with the corresponding site investigation plan. The budget shall
include, but not be limited to, a copy ofthe eligibility and deductibility determination ofthe
OSFM and an estimate ofall costs associated with the development, implementation, and
completion ofthe site investigation plan, excluding handling charges and costs associated with
monitoring well abandonment.
In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet the Board Note following subsection 734.310(e) was
amended to reference subsection (e) instead ofsubsection (d). Please refer to the Agency’s First
Errata Sheet for additional information.
-
-
-
-
Section 734.315
-
Stage 1 Site Investigation. Stage 1 site investigation is designed to
gather initial information on the extent ofcontamination.
Wall samples. Subsection 734.3 15(a)(1)(A) requires the collection ofsoil samples from
borings drilled 15 feet out from earlyaction soil samples that exceed the most stringent
Tier 1 remediation objectives of35 Ill. Adm. Code 742 for the applicable indicator
contaminants (“Tier 1 remediation objectives”). It is the opinion ofthe Illinois EPA that
15 feet is a reasonable initial distance to help determine the horizontal extent of
contamination in the soil above Tier 1 remediation objectives. Eachboring shall be
drilled to a depth of30 feet or until groundwater orbedrock is encountered, whichever
occurs first, to help determine the vertical extent ofcontamination in the soil above Tier 1
remediation objectives.
Floor samples. Subsection 734.3 15(a)(1)(B) requires the collection ofa soil sample from
one boring drilled as close as practicableto the location ofeach early action soil sample
5
collected from the floor ofthe tank excavation that exceeds Tier 1 remediation objectives.
Each boring shall be drilled to a depth of 15 feet below the tank excavation floor or until
groundwater or bedrockis encountered, whichever occurs first, to help determine the
vertical extent ofcontamination in the soil above Tier 1 remediation objectives.
Piping samples. Subsection
734.3 15(a)(l.)(C)
requires the collection of soil samples from
three borings drilled for each soil sample collected from the piping run during early
action that exceeds Tier 1 remediation objectives. To help determine the extent of
contamination in the soil above Tier 1 remediation objectives adjacent to the former
piping, one boring shall be drilled as close as practicable to the location ofthe sample and
two borings shall be drilled 15 feet out from the location ofthe sample (perpendicular to
the
piping run), in opposite directions from eachother. All three borings shall be drilled
to a depth of 15 feet below the piping run excavation floor oruntil groundwater or
bedrock is encountered, whichever occurs first, to help determine the vertical extent of
contamination in the soil above Tier 1 remediation objectives.
-
Piping-left-in-place samples. Subsection 734.31 5(a)(1)(D) requires the collection ofsoil
samples from one boring drilled 15 feet out from the location ofeach early action soil
sample collected near the piping run left in place that exceeds the most stringent Tier 1
remediation objectives to help determine the extent ofcontamination in the soil adjacent
to the piping above Tier 1 remediation objectives. Each boring shall be drilled to a depth
of 15 feet or until groundwater or bedrockis encountered, whichever occurs first, to help
determine the vertical extent ofcontamination in the soil above Tier 1 remediation
objectives.
In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet subsections 734.31
5(a)(1
)(D) and (E) were amended to
6.
-include the word “be” after “shall” in the first sentence. Please refer to the First Errata
Sheet for additional information.
Soil sample collection. One soil sample shall be collected from each-five-foot interval of
each boring required under subsections 734.31
5(a)(
1 )(A) through (E). A five-foot interval was
selected because drill rigs typically use five-foot sections tocollect a soil boring. —Each sample
shall be collected from the location within the five-foot interval that is the most contaminated as
a result ofthe release. This should be determined with the use ofa field-screening device, such
as a photoionization detector, or visually. If an area ofcontamination cannot be identified within
-
a five-foot interval, the sample shall be collected from the center ofthe five-foot interval. For
borings required under subsection 734.3
15(a)(1)(B),
or alternates ofsuchborings required under
subsection 734.3
15(a)(1)(E),
soil samples shall be collected only from soil located at orbelow
the elevation ofthe tank excavation floor, provided, however, that soil samples shall not be
collected from soil below the groundwater table. The reason for this is that contamination in the
saturated zone will be a dressed through the investigation and remediation ofthe groundwater.
All samples shall be analyzed for the applicable indicator contaminants.
Groundwater investigation. Subsection 734.31
5(a)(2)(A)
requires a groundwater
-
.
-
investigation under certain circumstances, which are taken from subsections 732.202(h)(4) and
732.300(b)(2), namely:
-
1) There is evidence that groundwater wells have been impacted by the release above
the Tier 1 remediation objectives;
2)
-
Free product that may impact groundwater is found to need recovery in compliance
with Section 734.2
15;
or
3) There is evidence that contaminated soils may be ormay have been in contact with
7
groundwater, except that, if the owner or operator pumps the excavation ortank
cavity dry, properly disposes ofall contaminated water, and demonstrates to the
Illinois EPA that no recharge is evident during the 24 hours following pumping, the
owner or operator does not have to complete a groundwater investigation, unless the
Illinois EPA’s review reveals that further groundwater investigation is necessary.
Ifa groundwater investigation is required, subsection 734.31
5(a)(2)(B)
requires the
installation of five groundwater monitoring wells: one where groundwater contamination is most
likely to be present and the remaining four installed at the property boundaries or 200 feet from
the UST system, whichever is less. Installing a groundwater monitoring well where groundwater
contamination is most likely to be present will likely yield the highest level of groundwater
contamination to help define the extent ofgroundwater contamination and determine whetherthe
contamination extends off-site. The location ofthe remaining four groundwatermonitoring
wells is consistent with the requirements of Section 732.307(j) as well as current Illinois EPA
practice.
-
-
Subsection 734.3 15(a)(2)(B) further requires the collection ofsoil samples from
groundwatermonitoring well installation borings that are located beyond earlyaction soil
-
samples that exceed the Tier 1 remediation objectives. This is necessary to help determine the
horizontal and vertical extent ofsoil contamination that exceeds the Tier 1 remediation
objectives. In addition to the initial soil and groundwater investigations, subsection
734.31 5(a)(3) requires an initial water supply well survey in accordance with subsection
734.445(a). The purpose ofthe water supply well survey is to identif~’all potable watersupply
wells located at the site or within 200 feet ofthe site, all community water supply wells located
at the site or within 2,500 feet ofthe site, and all regulated recharge areas and wellhead
8
protection areas in which the site is located, and to determine whetherthe setback ofa potable
well, regulated recharge area or wellhead protection area is or may be impacted by the UST
release.
-
-
-
In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet new subsection 734.31
5(a)(2)(E)
was added to specify
the requirements ofhydraulic conductivity testing. Please refer to the First Errata Sheet for
additional information.
Subsection 734.3
15(b)
requires the Stage 1 site investigation plan to consist of a
certification signed by the owner or operator and by a Licensed Professional Engineer or
Licensed Professional Geologist. The Illinois EPA will include the certification statement, along
with a place for signatures, with the 45-day report form. A certification is required for ease of
administration because the Stage 1 site investigation is the same for all sites. Ifnone ofthe
samples collected as part ofthe Stage 1 site investigation exceed the Tier 1 remediation
objectives, subsection 734.315(c) directs the owner or operator to submit a site investigation
completion report in accordance with Section 734.330. Ifone or more samples exceed the Tier 1
remediation objectives, subsection 734.315(c) directs the owner or operator to Stage 2 ofthe site
investigation.
Section 734.320
—
Stage 2 Site Investigation. Section 734.320 sets forth the requirements
for defining the remaining extent ofon-site contamination that exceeds the Tier 1 remediation
objectives.
Subsection 734.320(a) requires additional soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells
to the extent necessary to define the extent ofon-site contamination that exceeds the Tier 1
remediation objectives. Soil samples shall be collected in appropriate locations and at
appropriate depths, based upon the results ofthe soil sampling and other investigation activities
9
conducted to date, provided, however, that soil samples shall not be collected below the
-
groundwater table. The reason forthis is that contamination in the saturated zone will be
addressed through the investigation and remediation ofthe groundwater. This also applies to any
soil samples collected from a monitoring well boring.
Subsection 734.320(b) sets forth the requirements for the Stage 2 site investigation plan,
which must include the results ofthe Stage 1 site investigation as well activities proposed for
Stage 2 ofthe site investigation. In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet subsection 734.320(b)(3)(H)
is amended to remove the word “logs” from the first clause. Please refer to the First Errata Sheet
for additional information.
-
Ifthe owner or operator does not propose additional on-site investigation in the Stage 2
site investigation plan and contamination exceeding the Tier 1 remediation objectives does not
extend off-site (i.e., Stage 1 samples exceed the Tier 1 remediation objectives but no additional
investigation is needed to define the extent ofcontamination exceeding the Tier 1 remediation
objectives), subsection 734.320(c) requires the owner or operator to proceed with the submission
ofa site investigation completion report in accordance with Section 734.330. Ifthe owner or
operator does not propose additional on-site investigation in the Stage 2 site investigation plan
but contamination exceeding the Tier 1 remediation objectives extends off-site (i.e., Stage 1
sampling is adequate to definethe extent ofon-site contamination that exceeds the Tier 1
remediation objectives), subsection 734.320(c) requires the owner or operator to submit a Stage
3 site investigation plan in accordance with Section 734.325.
Ifthe results ofa Stage 2 site investigation indicate that contamination exceeding the Tier
I remediation objectives does not extend off-site, subsection 734.320(d) directs the owner or
operator to proceed with the submission ofa site investigation completion report in accordance
10
with Section 734.330. Ifthe results ofa Stage 2 site investigation indicate that contamination
exceeding the Tier 1 remediation objectives extends off-site, subsection 734.320(d) requires the
owner or operator to submit a Stage 3 site investigation plan in accordance with Section 734.325.
Section 734.325
—
Stage 3 Site Investigation. Section 734.325 sets forth the requirements
for defining the extent ofoff-site contamination that exceeds the Tier 1 remediation objectives.
Subsection 734.325(a) requires additional soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells
to the extent necessary to define the extent ofoff-site contamination exceeding the Tier 1
remediation objectives. Soil samples shall be collected in appropriate locations and at
appropriate depths, based upon the results ofthe soil sampling and other investigation activities
conducted to date, provided, howeyer, that soil samples shall not be collected below the
groundwater table. This also applies to any soil samples collected from a monitoring well
boring.
Subsection 734.325(b) sets forth the requirements for the Stage 3 site investigation plan,
which must include the results ofthe Stage 2 site investigation as well as activities proposed for
Stage 3 ofthe site investigation. In the Agency’s First Errata Sheetsubsection
734.325(b)(2)(G)
is amended to remove the word “logs” from the first clause. Please refer to the First Errata Sheet
for additional information.
-
Subsection 734.325(c) requires owners and operators to proceed with the submission ofa
site investigation completion report in accordance with Section 734.330 after the Stage 3 site
investigation is complete.
-
-
Section 734.330
—
Site Investigation Completion Report. Section 734.330 prescribes the
contents ofthe site investigation completion report. The primarypurpose ofthe report is to
present information that supports and demonstrates that the extent ofthe soil and groundwater
11
contamination has been defined and presents a proposal for the next course ofaction, if any.
Within 30 days after completing the site investigation, the owner or operator shall submit to the
Illinois EPA for approval a site investigation completion report.
Section 734.335
—
Corrective Action Plan. Subsection 734.335(a) prescribes the contents
ofthe corrective action plan, which is required if any ofthe applicable, indicator contaminants
exceed their Tier 1 remediation objectives. The primary purpose of the plan is to present a
proposal to address the on-site and off-site contamination that exceeds the Tier 1 remediation
objectives. Within 30 days after the Illinois EPA approves the site investigation completion
report, the owner or operator shall submit to the Illinois EPA for approval a corrective action
plan.
-
-
Subsection 734.335(c) is taken from the Environmental Protection Act. Subsections
734.335(b), (d), and (e) are based upon subsections 732.405(b), (d), and (e).
Section 734.340
—
Alternative Technologies. Section 734.340 is identical to 732.407.
Doug Clay will provide testimony on Section 732.407.
Section 734.345
—
Corrective Action Completion Report. Subsection 734.345(a)
prescribes the contents ofthe corrective action completion report. Within 30 days afterthe
completion ofa cOrrective action plan that achieves the applicable remediation objectives, the
owner or operator shall submit to the Illinois EPA for approval a corrective action completion
report.
-
Subsection 734.345(b) is identical to subsection 732.404(c).
Section 734.350
—
Off-site Access. Section 734.350 is identical to Section 732.411.
Section 734.355
—
Status Report. Subsections 734.355(a) and (b) are taken from the
Environmental Protection Act. Subsections 734.355 (b) and (c) are similar to subsection
12
732.405(f).
Subpart D: Miscellaneous Provisions
Section 734.400
—
General. Section 734.400 explains that the provisions ofSubpart D
apply to all activities conducted under Part 734 and all plans, budgets, and reports submitted
under Part 734. These miscellaneous provisions may apply at several points in the release
response process and have been consolidated in Subpart D for ease ofreference.
Section 734.405
—
Indicator Contaminants. Section 734.405 is identical to Section
732.3 10.
Section 734.410
—
Remediation Objectives. Section 734.4 10 is identical to Section
732.408, except that High Priority corrective action and corrective action pursuant to specific
sections in Part 732 are referenced in Section 732.408. In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet
Section 734.410 is moved to Section 734.140. Refer to the First Errata Sheet foradditional
information.
-
Section 734.415
—
Data Quality. Section 734.415 is based upon subsections
732.3
07(j)(5)(A)
and (C). In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet the reference to Section 734.4 10 in
subsection 734.415(b) is changed to refer to Section 734.140. Also in the Errata Sheet, the
-words “most stringent” were added prior to “objectives or detection levels” in subsection
734.415(b) to ensure that proper practical quantitation limits are used when samples are
analyzed. Please refer to the First Errata Sheet for additional information.
Section 734.420
—
Laboratory Certification. Section 734.420 is identical to Section
732.106.
-
Section 734.425
—
Soil Borings. Subsections 734.425(a) and (b) are identical to
subsections 732.307(c)(1)(E) and (G). Subsection 734.425(c) is identical to subsections
13
732.308(a)(l) and (a)(2)(C).
-
Section 734.430
—
Monitoring Well Construction and Sampling. Section 734.430 is
based upon subsections 732.307(j)(3) through
(5).
-
Section 734.435
—
Sealing ofSoil Borings and Groundwater Monitoring Wells. Section
734.435 is identical to subsection 732.308(b).
Section 734.440
—
Site Map Requirements. Section 734.440 establishes minimum
requirements for all maps included with the documents submitted to he Illinois EPA. These map
requirements are consistent with the maps that have been submitted to the Illinois EPA since the
inception ofthe LUST program.
Section 734.445
—
Water Supply Well Survey. Section 734.445 contains water supply
well survey requirements. The purpose ofthe survey is to identify all potable water supply wells
that have been or may be affected by the release.
Subsection 734.445(a) sets forth the minimum requirements for the initial water supply
well survey performed as part ofthe Stage 1 site investigation (see 734.31
5(a)(3)).
The
-
subsection is identical to subsection 732.307(f).
Actions taken to identify the wells shall include contacting the Illinois EPA’s Division of
Public Water Supplies, the Illinois State Geological Survey, the Illinois State Water Survey, and
the Illinois Department ofPublic Health (orthe county or local health department delegated by
the Illinois Department ofPublic Health to permit potable water supply wells), and the local
public water supply entities. The number ofagencies that must be contacted to collect potable
water supply well datato complete the surveywas expanded because the data source ofeach
agency is incomplete by itself. Therefore, the Illinois EPA expects a higher level ofconfidence,
as well as a more complete data source, in data collected from all agencies that maintain potable
14
water supply well data.
-
Subsection 734.445(b) and (c) address additional water supply well survey activities that
may be required, depending upon site-specific circumstances. Subsections 734.445(b) and (c)
are identical to subsection 732.404(e)(1).
-
Subsection 734.445(b) requires the owner or operator to extend the water supply well
survey if soil or groundwater contamination exceeding the Tier 1 remediation objectives extends
beyond the site’s property boundary, or, as part ofa corrective action plan, the owner oroperator
proposes to leave in place soil or groundwater contamination exceeding the Tier 1 remediation
objectives and contamination exceeding such objectives is modeled to migrate beyond the site’s
property boundary. Expansion ofthe survey is designed to ensure that contamination does not
-
reachpotable water supply wells.
Subsection 734.445(c) requires additional investigation ofpotable water supply wells,
regulated recharge areas, or wellhead protection areas if site-specific circumstances warrant.
Such circumstances include the existence ofone or more parcels ofproperty within 200 feet of
the current or modeled extent of soil or groundwater contamination exceeding the Tier 1
remediation objectives where potable water is likely to be used, but that is not served by a public
water supply or a well identified pursuant to subsections 734.445(a) or (b). The additional
investigation may Involvephysicalwell surveys (e.g., interviewing property owners,
investigating individual properties for wellheads, distributing door hangers or other material that
requests information about the existence ofpotable wells on the property, etc.).
Subsection 734.445(d) sets forth water supply well survey documentation that must be
submitted in site investigation plans, site investigation completion reports, and corrective action
completion reports (see 734.320(b)(3)(G), 734.330(b)(8), and
734.345(a)(7)).
Subsection
-
15
734.445(d) is identical to subsections 732.309(a) and 732.409(a)(2).
-
Section 734.450
—
Deferred Site Investigation or Corrective Action; Priority List for
Payment. Doug Clay will provide testimony on Section 734.450.
16
Attachment A -
Free Product
Survey
State
Free Product Thickness (in.)
Measurement Method
Indiana
0.039
Interface probe or tape
Iowa
0.12
Not provided
Michigan
0.125
Interface probe or bailer
Nebraska
0.12
-
Not provided
Nevada
0.5
Not provided
New Mexico
0.12-
Interface probe or tape
New York
0.125
Interface tape
South Carolina
0.12
Interface probe or tape
South Dakota
0.0625
Interface probe
Virginia
- 0.12
Not provided
17
Hernando A. Albarracin
1021 North Grand Ave. East, P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62974-9276
(217) 524-2448
Education
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
—
May 1986
Bachelor ofScience in Mining Engineering
-
Employment
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, Illinois —1996 to present
Public Service Administrator
As Unit Manager in the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section, manage and
direct activities ofseven project managers in the unit.
-
• Assign workload and provide technical guidance and assistance to project
managers in the review and evaluation ofprojects.
• Perform annualperformance evaluations.
• Coordinate Site Remediation Program activities forthe Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Section.
-
• Manage special projects, such as the remediation ofabandoned gas stations
funded by U.S. EPA grants, forthe Leaking Underground Storage Tank
-
Section.
• Respond to oral and written inquiries, including inquiries ofa controversial or
sensitive nature.
-
•
Speak at-Illinois Brownfields Conferences and other public forums regarding
the remediation ofunderground storage tank releases.
• Coordinate and facilitate the development ofLeaking Underground Storage
Tank Section documents for posting on the Internet.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, Illinois
—
1989-1996
Environmental Protection Engineer
As permit engineer in the Permit Section, reviewed hazardous waste management
permit applications for compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
and Illinois regulations.
• Attended inspections ofhazardous waste management facilities in Illinois.
• Attended public hearings concerning the issuance of RCRA permits.
• Responded to oral and written inquiries regarding hazardous waste
management regulations in Illinois.
-
18
• Completed continuing education courses related to hazardous waste
management.
-
•
Assisted with the training ofnew employees.
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
—
1988-1989
ResearcherI
-
Performed work on rock mechanics research projects in the Department ofMining
Engineering.
• Conducted experiments in the laboratory and analyzed data.
• Installed instrumentation in Illinois coal mines and monitored data.
• Assisted with writing ofreports to project sponsors.
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
—
1986-1988
Graduate
Assistant
Conducted research on rock mechanics and ground control in the Department of
Mining Engineering, utilizing finite element computer software while pursuing a
master’s degree.
-
-
Special Skills
Translate Illinois EPA documents to Spanish to assist Hispanic communities in
Illinois
with environmental issues.
19
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
iN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
R04-23
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
TANKS (35 ILJ~.ADM. CODE 734)
)
TESTIMONY OF DOUGLAS E. OAKLEY IN SUPPORT OF
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL
TO ADOPT 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 734
1. Background
My name is Doug Oakley. I have been the official manager of the LUST Claims Unit
for the past
5
years. However, I have worked in the reimbursement / payment- side of the
program in various capacities since January of 1990. The primary function of the LUST
Claims Unit is to review claims submitted for payment from the Underground Storage Tank
(UST) Fund to determine if the costs are eligible, reasonable, and, if necessary, approved in a
Corrective Action Plan and Budget. I am a U.S. Army Veteran and in 1980 received an
Associate Degree From Lincoln Land Community College. My resume is attached. I will be
testifying
in support of amendments to 35 III. Admin. Code Part 734.
2. Description ofthe Proposed Regulations
-
-- -
Subpart F: Payment From The Fund
-
Section 734.605
—
Applications for Payment. Subsection 732.60l(b)(9) has been
added to the 732 regulations ‘and is therefore added to the 734 regulations at
734.605(b)(9).
New subsection 732.601(b)(lO) has been added to the 732 regulations and therefore
added to the 734 regulations at 734.605(b)(10).
Language in Subsection 732.60 l(b)(ll) was added to the 732 regulations and
therefore added to the 734 regulations at 734.605(b)(l 1).
-
1
New wording added at 734.605(1) and (g)
~5
consistent with amended subsection
732.601(f) and (g).
New subsection 732.601(i) was added to the 732 regulations and therefore added to
the 734 regulations at 734.605(i).
New subsection 732.601(j) was added to the 732 regulations and therefore added to
the 734 regulations at
734.605(j).
Section 734.610
—
Review of Applications for Payment. This Section has been
clarified in the 732 regulations at 732.602 and therefore is added to the 734 regulations.
Section 734.625
—
Eligible Corrective Action Costs. This Section is consistent with
Section 732.605 in the 732 regulations.
-
Section 734.630
—
Ineligible Corrective Action Cost. This Section is consistent with
Section 732.606 in the 732 regulations.
-
Section 734.650— Indemnification. This Section is consistent with Section 732.6 10 in
the 732 regulations.
2
1021
North
Grand Avenue
Phone 217-782-6762
East
Fax 21 7-5571165
P.O. Box 19276
E-mail
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
Doug.OakIey~epa.state.il.us
Douglas E.
Oakley
Professional
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
experience
Public
Service Administrator (July
1999
to present)
Manage, direct, organize and supervise the Unit activities of all
staff responsible for auditing and tracking claims against the
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund; assist the -Division
Manager in Leaking Underground Storage Tank and Brownfields
accounting issues, including appearing at hearings before the
Illinois Pollution Control Board.
Accountant III /
Accountant Advanced (July 1993 to July
1999) Assign, supervise and review the Unit activities of a staff of
twelve professional and sub-professional personnel in maintaining
accounting records regarding the Leaking Underground Storage
Tank Fund; work daily with the accounting section head in the
development ofcomplex newprocedures and program changes.
Accountant II
(February 1992 thru
July 1993)
Independently perform complex accounting and auditing work in
regards to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund, assist in
converting manual financial operations to data processing, train
lower level accountants and office assistants, prepare complex’ audit
findings and give testimony in legal hearings and proceedings on
such findings.
Accountant I (January 1990 thru February 1992)
Maintained general account books, prepared flr~ancialstatements and
reports in regards to the illinois Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Fund, assisted upper level accountants in the preparation of detailed
reports to the Agency Division Manager and Director, attended
public seminars as required.
Office Assistant (May 1986 thru January 1990).
Maintained a complex complete set of general account books and
files pertaining to special waste stream applications, reviewed and
examined entries of various types of files, documents and records,
maintained log book associated with special waste generator
identifications numbers.
Illinois
Department of Revenue
(June 1984 thru
May 1986).
Validated, tracking check perfecting and processing over 300
different varieties of tax forms and checks. Supervised staff of
check perfecters during tax season.
3
Additional
United States Army — Veteran
Background
Former Commander and present member ofAmencan Legion Post
442
-
Education
-
Lincoln Land Community College, Springfield, II. —
1980,
Associate
degree in Business Administration
-
Graduate of
United
States
Army
School of Transportation located in
Ft.
Eustis, Va.
-
1967
Awards received
Certificate of Merit
—
Illinois
Department of Revenue, 1985
Superior Performance Award
—
Illinois Environmental Protection
-Agency, 1991
-
-
Bureau of Land Employee of the Month
—
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, July 1992
Ten Year Service Award
—
State Of Illinois
—
1994
Fifteen Year Service Award
—
State ofIllinois
-
1999
-
4
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
R04-23
-
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
LEAKiNG UNDERGROUND STORAGE )
TANKS (PROPOSED NEW
35
ILL.
)
ADM. CODE 734)
)
-
TESTIMONY OF BRIAN BAUER IN SUPPORT OF
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO ADOPT
35 ILL. ADM. CODE 734
My name is BrianBauer. I am a Project Manager in the Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Section within the Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency. I have worked in my current position since April 1992. I received a B.S. in
Biology in 1990 from Northland College and a M.A. in Environmental Studies in 1998
from the University ofIllinois at Springfield. My resume is attached.
Today I will testify in support ofthe proposal to adopt 35 Ill. Adm. Code 734.
This proposal is the result ofmodifications to the Illinois Environmental Protection Act
by Public Acts 92-0554 and 92-0735, and the need to reform the current reimbursement
procedures. My testimony will focus on the following maximum payment amounts
proposed in Subpart H, as well as Appendix E, ofPart 734:
Section 734.810
UST Removal orAbandonment
Section 734.8 15
Free Product or Groundwater Removal and
Disposal
Section 734.820
Drilling, Well Installation and Abandonment
Section 734.840
Replacement of Concrete, Asphalt, or Paving;
Destruction orDismantling and Reassembly of
Above Grade Structures
Section 734.845
-
Professional Consulting Services
Section 734.APPENDIX E Personnel Titles and Rates
Harry Chappel will discuss the remaining portions ofSubpart H in his testimony.
Since 1989 the Agency has reviewed over 18,300 applications for payment and
paid more than $565,000,000.00 from the Underground Storage Tank Fund. Since
September 13, 1993, the Agency has reviewed over 12,800 budgets forproposed
corrective action activities. Based on this collective experience, the Agency believes that
the following proposed maximum costs are reasonable and fair. The Agency realizes that
the amount ofdataused to calculate the proposed maximum payment amounts may
appear small, however these averages are consistent with the Agency’s historical data and
the rates the Agency is presently approving in budgets and applications for payment.
Section 734.8 10 UST Removal orAbandonment Costs
The allowable costs for the excavation, removal, and disposal or abandonment of
an UST system are listed in the table below. -The maximum cost is based on the size on
each UST being removed or abandoned.
UST Volume
.
Maximum Total Amount per UST
110—999 gallons
-
$2,100.00
1,000
—
14,999 gallons
$3,150.00
15,000 or more gallons
$4,100.00
The above rates include all costs associated with the excavation, removal, and disposal or
abandonment of an UST system. Costs for consultant oversight and the disposal ofwaste
other than the UST itself are not included in this rate.
An evaluation oftwenty LUST sites, nine ofwhich had tank removal or
abandonment charges broken out as separate charges, was conducted. At the nine LUST
2
sites a total of34 USTs were either removed or abandoned in place. The evaluation
revealed that the average cost to remove each ofthe USTs was $3,152.71. Based on the
Agency’s experience, this average cost is consistent with the amounts the Agency has
seen historically for the removal ofUSTs within the typical range of6,000-gallons to
10,000-gallons in size. During conversations.with UST removal contractors it was
determined that smaller tanks (110-gallons to 999-gallons) cost less and that larger tanks
(15,000-gallons ormore) cost more to remove or abandon than medium-sized tanks
(1,000-gallons to 14,999-gallons). However, not proportionally more.
Section 734.815 Free Product or Groundwater Removal and Disposal
The maximum allowable costs forthe removal, transportation, and disposal of
free product or groundwater shall not exceed $0.68 per gallon. This rate includes, but is
not limited to, all costs associated with the removal, transportation and mobilization, and
the disposal offree product or groundwater. The rate is for the removal of free product or
groundwater from an excavation, monitoring well, sump, or other location via a vacuum
truck as well as the removal offree product or groundwater from drums collected via
hand bailing of free product from a monitoring well or sump orother approved method.
Contaminated-groundwater collected during monitoring well development orpurging
activities may also be disposed and reimbursed through this method instead ofdisposing
ofcontaminated groundwater in drums, which will be discussed later.
An evaluation offifty-seven LUST sites where free product and/or contaminated
groundwater was removed via one ofthe methods discussed above revealed that the
average cost to remove, transport, and dispose free product and/or contaminated
groundwater was $0.68 per gallon. Based on discussions with consultants and
3
contractors it was determined that a minimum amount needed to be established since it
would not be economically feasible to dispose ofsmall amounts offree product and
groundwater at the per-gallon rate. The Agency conducted a survey ofvacuum truck
contractors and determined that a $200.00 minimum charge should be available for
instances where small amounts offree product and groundwater were being removed,
transported, and disposed.
Section 734.820(a~Drilling. Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
The allowable maximum costs for drilling for the purpose ofcollecting soil
samples and/or the installation ofa monitoring well and forborings advanced for the
purpose ofinjecting a compound for a remediation activity are listed in the table below.
The table establishes a rate per linear foot ofdrilling advanced based on the type of
drilling that is conducted and the reason forthe drilling.
Type ofDrilling
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
$23.00 per foot
Direct-push platform
$18.00 per foot
Direct-push platform forinjection
$15.00 per foot
-
The above rate includes, but is not limited to, all costs formobilizing and demobilizing
the drill rig or d-irect-push platform to and from the site, drilling labor, which usually
consists oftwo people (a driller and a laborer), decontamination ofthe drilling
equipment, the actual act ofdrilling, soil boring abandonment, and incidental expenses or
charges such as 55-gallon drums, bentonite to backfill the soil boring, liners, sleeves, or
concrete coring. The rates do not include costs associated with consultant oversight of
the drilling or monitoring well installation.
4
The rates are broken down into two different drilling types: hollow-stem auger
and direct-push platform. Hollow-stem auger drilling is considered the conventional
drilling method for collecting soil samples and installing monitoring wells that uses, as
the name implies, a hollow-stem auger. A drill rig rotates the auger and a bit on the end
ofthe auger loosens the soil, which then brings the soil to the surface by the rotating
auger flights. Direct-push is a method that employs hollow steel rods that are driven,
pushed, and/or vibrated into the ground. Some direct-push platforms are capable ofusing
an auger tool for the installation ofa monitoring well. Since there is an additional
amount ofdrilling that is required to install a monitoring well via a direct-pushplatform
with an auger attachment (more so than just installing a direct—push monitoring well), the
applicable drilling rate for a direct-push platform with an auger attachment will be the
hollow-stem auger rate rather than the direct-push platform rate.
A.
Hollow-stem AugerDrilling
An evaluation offorty-nine LUST sites revealed the average for hollow-stem
auger drilling to be $16.72 per linear foot ofsoil boring drilled.
-
Additional average costs
associated with hollow-stem auger drilling are as follows:
Activity
Average
-
Mobilization / Demobilization
$307.72 per event
Decontamination
$136.18 per event
-
Based on the Agency’s experience and the amount ofdrilling required to satisfy
the proposed regulation changes it was determinedthat the average amount offeet drilled
at one event ranges from 100 to 120 feet. Assuming an average of100 feet of drilling per
event, eight soil borings advanced to a depth of 10 to 15 feet, an’ average cost per linear
5
foot drilled formobilization and demobilization, decontamination, and well abandonment
would be as follows:
Activity
Cost per foot
Mobilization / Demobilization
$3.08
Decontamination-
$1.36
-
-. --
- .‘
-
Adding the above costs to the average forhollow-stem auger drilling of $16.72
per linear foot of soil boring drilled, the total cost per linear foot drilled is $21.16. To
cover incidental expenses or charges, $1.84 per foot was added for a total cost of$23.00
per linear foot drilled using a hollow-stem auger.
Based on conversations with consultants it was determined that drilling events
where only a limited number ofsoil borings ormonitoring wells would be installed
would not be economicallypossible since certain costs such as mobilization,
demobilization, and decontamination were at a fixed rate regardless ofthe number of feet
being drilled. The Agency determined that a $1,500.00 minimum charge should be
available for instances when limited hollow-stem auger drilling was needed.
B.
Direct-push Platform
An evaluation ofnine LUST sites revealed the average daily rate for the use ofa
direct-push platform ranged from $1,000.00 to $1,200.00. Based on the Agency’s
-
experience this range is typical of what the Agency would normally see. Again, assuming
an average of 100 feet of drilling per event, eight soil borings advanced to a depth of 10
to 15 feet, an average cost per linear foot pushed would be $10.00 to $12.00. The Agency
assumed that the same additional cost as hollow-stem auger drilling would be incurred
with direct-push. These costs are as follows:
-
6
Activity
Cost per foot
Mobilization / Demobilization
$3.08
Decontamination
$1.36
Adding the above costs to the upper limit value ofthe average range for direct-
push platform drilling of$12.00 per linear foot ofdirect-push soil boring, the total cost
per linear foot drilled is $16.44. To cover incidental expenses or charges, $1.56 per foot
was added for a total cost of $18.00 per linear foot drilled using a direct-pushplatform.
Based on conversations with consultants it was determinedthat drilling events
where only a couple ofdirect-push soil borings or monitoring wells would be installed
would not be economically possible since certain costs such as mobilization and
--
demobilization, and decontamination were at a fixed rate regardless ofthe number offeet
-
being drilled. The Agency determined that a $1,200.00 minimum charge should be
available for instances when limited direct-push soil borings were needed.
-
C.
Direct-push
Platform for Injection
-
The rate fordirect-push platform for injection is included the Agency’s First
Errata Sheet to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 734. The direct-pushplatform for injection of
-
compounds for remedial purposes rate used the same evaluation ofnine LUST sites
mentioned above that revealed the average daily rate for the use of a direct-pushplatform
ranged from $1,000.00 to $1,200.00. Again, assuming an average of 100 feet ofdrilling
per event, eight soil borings to a depth of 10 to 15 feet, an average cost per linear foot
pushed would be $10.00 to $12.00. The Agency assumed that the same additional
mobilization and demobilization cost, as hollow-stem auger drilling would be incurred
-
with direct-push for injection. These costs are as follows:
7
Activity
Cost per foot
Mobilization / Demobilization
$3.08
Adding the above cost to the upper limit value ofthe average range for direct-
push platform drilling of$12.00 per linear foot ofdirect-push soil boring, the total cost
per linear foot drilled is $15.00.. Since soil sampling orthe installation ofa monitoring
well would be conducted at the same time as the injection ofa compound, neither
incidental expenses nor decontamination charges were included in this rate.
Based on conversations with consultants it was determined that drilling events
where only a couple ofdirect-push soil borings ormonitoring wells would be installed
would not be economicallypossible since certain costs such as mobilization and
demobilization were at a fixed rate regardless ofthe number offeet being drilled. It was
also assumed that direct-push platform drilling for injection would have similar economic
restraints; therefore, the Agency determined that a $1,200.00 minimum charge should be
available for instances when limited direct-push for injection soil borings were needed.
Section 734.820(b~Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Groundwater-Monitoring Wells
If a permanent monitoring well were installed in a soil boring advanced in
conjunction with Subsection 734.820(a) the maximum rates listed in the following table
would be applicable:
Type ofBorehole
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
$16.50/foot
Direct-push platform
$12.50/foot
8
The above rates include, but are not limited to, all costs for the installation ofa
groundwater-monitoring well except for cOsts associated with drilling or consultant
oversight ofthe drilling or monitoring well installation.
The rates are broken down into two different drilling types: hollow-stem auger
and direct-push platform. Some direct-pushplatforms are capable ofusing an auger tool
for the installation ofa monitoring well. Since the materials used to install monitoring
wells via a direct-push platform with an auger attachment are similar to the materials
used to install monitoring wells via a hollow-stem auger, the applicable rate for
monitoring wells installed via a direct-push platform with an auger attachment will be the
hollow-stem auger rate rather than the direct-pushplatform rate.
-
An evaluation ofthirty-seven LUST sites revealed the following cost averages for
the components ofa monitoring well:
-
Material
Hollow-stem auger
Direct-push platform
PVC Screen 10-foot
$35.00
$30.00
PVC Riser 10-foot
$20.00
$15.00
Well Box
$87.00
$87.00
Bottom Cap
$9.00
$7.00
Locking Cap
$22.00
$18.00
Lock
-
$7.00
$7.00
Bailer/rope
$16.00
$14.00
Concrete
$10.00
$10.00
Sand
$70.00
$40.00
Bentonite
$45.00
-
$15.00
9
Incidentals
$9.00
$7.00
Total
-
$330.00
$250.00
The above averages are based on a monitoring well installed to a depth of20 feet below
ground surface. The hollow-stem auger monitoring well is based on a 2-inch diameter
for the screen and riser. The direct-push platform monitoring well is -based on a 1 to 1.5-
inch diameter screen and riser. The rates for the installation ofa monitoring well were
determined by dividing the totals from the above table by 20 feet.
Section 734.820(c) Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Groundwater-recovery Wells
The rates for the installation of groundwater-recovery wells are included in the
-
Agency’s First Errata Sheet to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 734. The maximum rates listed in the
following table would be applicable based on the diameter ofthe finished recovery well:
Well Diameter
Maximum Total Amount
4 or 6 inches
$25.00/foot
8 inches or greater
$41.00/foot
The above rates include, but are not limited to, all costs forthe installation ofa
groundwater recovery well except for costs associated with drilling or consultant
oversight ofthe.drilling ormonitoring well installation.
An evaluation of seven LUST sites and extrapolation ofthe data for the 2-inch
monitoring well revealed the following values and cost averages forthe components of a
groundwater-recovery well:
Material
4 or 6 inches
8 inches or greater
PVC Screen lOfoot
$65.00
$110.00
10
-
PVC Riser 10 foot
Well Box
Bottom Cap
Locking Cap
-
Lock.
Bailer/rope
Concrete
Sand
Bentonite
$40.00
$87.00
$12.00
$23.00
$7.00
-
$16.00
$10.00
$140.00
$90.00
$10.00
$500.00
$80.00
$87.00
$12.00
$25.00
$7.00
$16.00
$10.00
$280.00
$180.00
$13.00
-
$820.00
Iii r~
A
i~~iif~
1~
Total
The above averages are based on a groundwater-recovery well installed to a depthof20
feet below ground surface. The rates forthe installation of a groundwater-recovery well
were determined by dividing the totals from the above table by 20 feet.
Section 734.820(d) Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Groundwater-monitoring Well Abandonment
The rates for groundwater-monitoring well abandonment are included in the Agency’s
First Errata Sheet to ‘35 Ill. Adm. Code 734. The regulations require that all groundwater-
monitoring wells be abandoned pursuant to the regulations promulgatedby the Illinois
Department ofPublic Health at 77 Ill. Adm. Code 920.120. These regulations require that the
well be filled with a substance such as bentonite and that the top two feet ofthe well casing be
removed.
11
The average cost to abandon a groundwater-monitoring well is about $150.00. The
average depth to which a groundwater-monitoring well is installed ranges from 15 to 20 feet
below ground. Dividing the average abandonment cost by 15 feet, the allowable maximum
cost for abandoning a groundwater-monitoring well is $10.00 per linear foot ofwell. This rate
would not apply to groundwater-monitoring wells that were destroyed or removed during an
excavation and were unable to be properly abandoned.
Section 734.840(a) Replacement ofConcrete. Asphalt, orPaving: Destruction or
Dismantling and Reassembly ofAbove Grade Structures
The allowable maximum costs forpaving or the replacement of asphalt or
concrete are listed in the table below. The table establishes a rate based on the thickness
ofthe asphalt being applied to the site.
Depth ofReplacement Material
Maximum Total Amount per Sciuare Foot
Two inches ofasphalt
$1.51
-
Three inches ofasphalt
$1.70
Four or more inches ofasphalt
$2.18
Any depth ofconcrete
$2.18
The above rate includes all costs associated with the replacement ofasphalt or concrete in
accordance with Section 734.625(a)(1 6). The square foot rates for the installation of
asphalt are from the 2003 National Construction Cost Estimator, 515t Edition. The
Agency proposes to use the same four or more inches ofasphalt rate for the concrete rate.
Concrete installed at the same thickness typically costs about 1/3 more than asphalt;
therefore, the Agency believes the most cost-effective approach is to limit the amount of
12
concrete replacement by limiting the concrete rate to the four or more inches ofasphalt
rate.
-
Section 734.840(b) Replacement ofConcrete, Asphalt, or Paving: Destruction or
Dismantling and Reassembly ofAbove Grade Structures
-
The total cost for the destruction or the dismantling and reassembly of above
grade structures shall not exceed $10,000.00. Please note that in the Agency’s First
Errata Sheet this limit is changed from $10,000 per site to $10,000 per occurrence. Costs
for‘these activities must be submitted to the Agency in a time and materials breakdown.
This is a clarification ofa policy by which the Agency has always abided. Doug Clay
will provide additional testimony on this subject as he addresses Section
734.625(a)(
17).
Section 734. 845(a)(2) Professional Consulting Services
Early Action
The allowable maximum costs for fieldwork or oversight for early action shall not
exceed a total of$500.00 per half-day~The Agency, based on conversation with the
Consulting Engineer Council ofIllinois (CECI), determined that fieldwork would be best
billed at a half-dayrate. The half-day rate is
5
hours ofwork at $80.00 per hour, the
average hourly wage (please refer to Mr. Chappel’s testimony for further information on
the average hourly wage) and the additional expenses listed in the table below.
I~rn
Vehicle or Mileage
$30.00
Photo Ionization Detector (PD)
$50.00
Miscellaneous Supplies
$20.00
13
-
The additional expenses are one-halfofthe average daily rates the Agency typically sees
in budget and reimbursement claim submittals for the items listed above. The
miscellaneous supplies charge is to cover such things as gloves, sampling jars, plastic
bags, and all other incidental materials.
-
-
Subsection 734.845(a)(2)(A) allows for one half-day for UST removal oversight
and one half-day for each 250 cubic yards ofvisibly contaminated fill material removed
and disposed ofin accordance with 734.210(f). Based on conversations with
-
underground storage tank removal contractors it appears that consultants are not always
present when the USTs are actuallybeing removed. Consultant participation during part
ofthe UST removal would be beneficial since soil sampling from the limits of the
excavation is required pursuant to Section 734.2 l0(h)(1). Consultant oversight of the
removal ofcontaminated fill material is standard practice; most soils can be excavated
into a truck via a 1 cubic yard backhoe at a rate of 57 cubic yards per hour (2003 National
Construction Cost Estimator, 51st Edition). The rate was rounded down to 250 cubic
yards per half-day, or
5
hours, to allow for a conservative estimate.
Subsection 734.845(a)(2)(B) allows forone half-day ofconsultant oversight for
every 4 soil borings that are conducted as part ofmeasuring forthe presence ofthe
release in accordance with Section 734.210(h)(2). One half-dayrate will apply to sites
where 1 to 4 soil borings are conducted, two half-day rates will be applicable for sites
where
5
to 8 soil borings are conducted, and so on. Based on conversations with former
members of the Agency’s drill rig team, 8 to 10 hollow-stem auger soil borings to a depth
of 20 feet could be conducted within a one-day period of8 hours. The half-dayrate
allows for
5
hours per half-day for such things as logging the boring, collecting samples,
14-
and screeningwith a PD while the boring is being advanced, and allows for an additional
hour offield time that should account for travel time and/or any other incidental time that
is needed.
Subsection 734.845(a)(2)(C) allows for one half-day ofconsultant oversight if a
line release is repaired.
-
Line releases are typically repaired by a UST installation
contractor, and the costs to repair the UST system are not reimbursable (Section
734.630(1)); however, the cost to sample the soil while the repair is being conducted and
document the repair is an eligible remediation cost. The Agency believes this work can
be conducted within the half-day time frame.
Section 734.845(a)(4) Professional Consulting Services
-
Free Product Removal
The allowable maximum costs for free product removal, fieldwork or field
oversight shall not exceed a total of$500.00 per half-day. The number ofhalf-days shall
be determined by the Agency on a site-specific basis.
Section 734.845(b)(2) Professional Consulting Services
Stage 1
Subsection 734.845(b)(2)(A), as included in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet to 35
Ill. Adm. Code 734, allows for one half-day ofconsultant oversight for every 4 soil
borings that are conducted as part ofthe Stage 1 site investigation that are not converted
to monitoring wells. The basis for this rate is explained in the paragraphs above for
Subsection
734.845(a)(2)(B).
Subsection 734.845(b)(2)(B), as included in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet to 35
Ill. Adm. Code 734, allows for one half-day ofconsultant oversight for each soil boring
15
-
that is converted to a monitoring well as part ofthe Stage 1 site investigation. Based on
conversations with former members ofthe Agency’s drill rig team, 4 monitoring wells
could be installed via a hollow-stem auger within a one-day period of8 hours. The half-
day rate for consultant oversight ofa monitoring well is based on the installation of4
monitoring wells; this rate includes time for soil sampling within the boring being
converted to a monitoring well.
Within 2 half-days, or one 10-hour day, 4 monitoring wells should be able to be
installed. Those 4 monitoring wells should be able to be purged, surveyed, and sampled
within 2 half-days (2 people x
5
hours). The total time to install fourmonitoring wells,
sample the soil borings, purge the wells, survey the wells, and sample the wells is 2 days
or 4 half-days, thus 1 well equals 1 half-day.
-
-
Section 734.845(b)(4) Professional Consulting Services
Stage 2
Subsection 734.845(b)(4)(A), as included in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet to 35
Ill. Adm. Code 734, allows for one half-day ofconsultant oversight for every 4 soil
borings -that are conducted as part ofthe Stage 2 site investigation that are not converted
to monitoring wells. The basis for this rate is explained in the paragraphs above for
Subsection 734.845(a)(2)(B).
-
-
Subsection 734.845(b)(4)(B), as included in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet to 35
Ill. Adm. Code 734, allows for one half-dayof consultant oversight for each soil boring
that is converted to a monitoring well as part ofthe Stage 2 site investigation. The basis
forthis rate is explained in the paragraphs above for Subsection 734.845(b)(2)(B).
16
Subsection 734.845(b)(6) Professional Consulting Services
Stage3
-
-
Subsection 734.845(b)(6)(A), as included in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet to 35
Ill. Adm. Code 734, allows for one half-day of consultant oversight for every 4 soil
borings that are conducted as part ofthe Stage 3 site investigation that are not converted
to monitoring wells. The basis forthis rate is explained in the paragraphs above for
Subsection 734.845(a)(2)(B);
Subsection 734.845(b)(6)(B), as included in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet to 35
Ill. Adm. Code 734, allows for one half-day of consultant oversight for each soil boring
that is converted to a monitoring well as part ofthe Stage 3 site investigation. The basis
for this rate is explained in the paragraphs above for Subsection 734.845(b)(2)(B).
Section 734.845(c)(2) Professional Consulting Services
Corrective Action
Subsection 734.845(c)(2)(A) allows for one half-day for each 250 cubic yards of
contaminated soil removed and disposed. The basis for this rate is explained in the
paragraphs above for Subsection 734.845(a)(2)(A).
-
Section 734.APPENDIX E Personnel Titles and Rates
The appendix ofpersonnel titles and rates was designed to be used whenever
payment is allowed on a time and materials basis. As noted in Agency testimony, there
are certain times when a site-specifictime and materials budget or reimbursement claim
breakdown is warranted-for example alternate technology corrective action. As part of
the time breakdown in the budget or reimbursement claim, the maximum hourly rate for a
particular title is listed in Appendix E. A consultant who proposes a time and material
-
17
budget must use the titles, and their personnel must be able to meet the title requirements
listed in Appendix E. The reimbursed personnel rate is based on the task performed, not
necessarily the title ofthe person performing the task (e.g., the proper rate fora
Professional Engineer or Professional Geologist collecting a sample from a groundwater-
monitoring well is a technician rate, not a Professional Engineer orProfessional
Geologist rate).
The consolidation oftItles used in the reimbursement process is essential to
-
maintaining consistency in Agency reviews and to expediting the review process. The
Agency has counted 136 different titles used in budgets and reimbursement claims.
Appendix E, excluding the maximum hourly rates, the addition ofthe Draftsperson/CAD
titles and the clarification on the minimum years ofexperience, was prepared by CECI.
The maximum hourly rates are based on the average rate the Agency has seen on
budgets and reimbursement claims submitted to the Agency. The rates were then
rounded off and adjusted to allow for Illinois license requirements and/or minimum years
ofexperience. The average hourly rate and the number ofentries to calculate the average
is as follows:
-
Title
-
Number ofEntries
Average Hourly Rate
Engineer
132
$78.25
Professional Engineer
205
$102.01
Geologist
174
$70.69
Professional Geologist
150
$91.74
Scientist
115
$69.10
Project Manager
222
$85.00
18
Senior Project Manager
42
$94.24
Technician
391
$54.58
Account Technician
31
$50.80
Administrative Assistant
252
$37.13
Draftsperson/CAD
146
$51.51
19
Brian P. Bauer
(217) 782-3335
EXPERIENCE:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield,
Illinois
Environmental Protection Specialist
III, April
1992 to Present
In the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section:
• Acted as the technical Project Manager for over 400 remediation
projects;
-
• Reviewed over 600 Applications for Reimbursement from the LUST
Fund;
• Was a member of numerous committees that include drafting proposed
regulations, developing standardized budget reviews, and developing
standard word processing documents;
• Mentor new staff;
-
• -
Temporarily assigned as a Unit Manager in the LUST Section (July
2001 through March 2002).
Design Ideas,
Springfield Illinois
Production Manager, April 1991 to April 1992
Supervise the production and packaging ofproducts.
Superior National Forest,
Isabella, Minnesota
Forestry Aid, May 1989 to August 1989
Main duties included stocking and survival surveys oftree plantations,
data calculation, recommendations for herbicidal spraying, and fire
fighting.
Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest,
Northbend, Washington
Trail Crew, May 1987 to
August 1987
Main duties included trail maintenance, backcountry patrol, and
trail
construction.
Payette National Forest, McCall,
Idaho
Trail
Crew, May 1986 to
August
1986
Main duties included trail maintenance, backcountry patrol, and trail
construction.
EDUCATION:
University ofIllinois, Springfield, Illinois
Master of
Arts
in Environmental
Studies, Emphasis is Environmental Risk
Assessment, 1998
Northland College, Ashland, Wisconsin
-
Bachelor ofScience, Major: Biology, Minor: Earth Science, 1990
Oakton Community
College, Des Plaines, Illinois
Associates ofArts, Major Liberal Arts, 1987
20
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THEMATTEROF:
)
-
)
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
R04-023
-
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE )
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
TANKS (PROPOSED NEW
35
ILL.
)
ADM. CODE 734)
)
TESTIMONY OF HARRY A CHAPPEL, P.E.
IN SUPPORT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO
ADOPT
35
ILL. ADM.
CODE 734
-
My name is Harry Chappel. I am a Unit Manager in the Leaking Underground Storage
Tank (UST) Section within the Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). I have been in my current position since March of2002. I was employed by the Illinois
EPA from 1976 to 1995. From 1995 to 2001 I was in private practice as a co-owner in two
environmental consulting firms located in Springfield, Illinois. I was the Manager ofthe
Leaking UST Section from 1991 to 1994. I received a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the
University ofMissouri at Rolla in 1975 and a M.S. in Thermal and Environmental Engineering
from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale in 1979. I have been a Registered Professional
Engineer in Illinois since 1979. A copy ofmy current resume is provided as Attachment 1.
Today I will be testifying in support ofthe proposal to adopt 35 Ill. Adm. Code, Part 734.
This proposal is the result ofmodifications to the Illinois Environmental Protection Act by
Public Act 92-0554 and 92-0735, and the need to reform the current reimbursement procedures.
My testimony will focus on the following reimbursement requirements proposed in Subpart H of
Part 734:
-734.800
Applicability
734.825
Soil Removal and Disposal
734.83
5
Sample Handling and Analysis
734.845
Professional Consulting Services
734.850
Payment on Time and Material Basis
734.855
Unusual or Extraordinary Expenses
734.865
Agency Review ofPayment Amounts
The remaining portions of Subpart H will be discussed by Brian Bauer in his testimony.
734.800
-
Applicability
This section specifies that all reimbursable tasks and/or activities under Part 734 will be
limited to a maximum amount specified therein. Illinois EPA has grouped all activities which
may be reimbursable into the following categories:
734.8 10— UST Removal or Abandonment
734.8 15
—
Free Product or Groundwater Removal and Disposal
734.820
—
Drilling, Well Installation and Abandonment
734.825
—
Soil Removal and Disposal.
734.830
—
Drum Disposal
734.83
5
—
Sample Handling and Analysis
734.840
—
Replacement ofPaving; Above Grade Structures
734.845
—
Professional Consulting Services
734.850
—
Time and Material Payments
734.855
—
Unusual or Extraordinary Expenses
734.860
—
Handling Charges
2
In support ofthese proposed allowable amounts, I have attached copies ofallowable
amounts from other states with similar programs. These attachments are as follows:
Attachment
2— Summary ofInformation
Attachment 3
—
Arizona
-
Attachment 4— Indiana
Attachment
5
—
Colorado
-
Attachment 6— Texas
-
Attachment 7—Oklahoma
-
Attachment 8—South Carolina
734.825
—
Soil Removal and Disposal
—
-
The Illinois EPA is proposing to allow a maximum of$57.00 per cubic yard for soil
excavation, transportation and disposal costs. Attachment 9 provides a summary ofrandomly
selected projects, which were reviewed in developing this figure. The $57 per cubic yard figure
proposed in the regulations is the sum ofthe cost to excavate, transport and dispose ($47.58) plus
one standard deviation ($8.22), rounded up to
$57
to allow for incidental expenses. The Illinois
EPA is proposing $20/cubic yard be allowed forbackfill costs. The $20/cubic yard figure is the
sum ofthe costs to backfill ($15.89) plus one standard deviation ($4.38), rounded to the nearest
whole dollar. The Illinois EPA is proposing separate amounts for these activities sincethe
amount ofsoil excavated and disposed does not always equal the amount ofbackfill required.
The Illinois EPA has historically allowed
$55
per cubic yard for excavation, transportation, and
disposal
ofcontaminated soil.
3
These costs include all equipment, personnel, trucking and disposal fees. They do not
include a consultant’s oversight ofthe removal operation.
To determine the volume ofsoil, a simple volume calculation is provided in the proposal.
To account forthe fact that the in-place volume is less thanthe excavated volume of soil, a
“fluff’ factor of
5
percent has been added to the equation. This
5
percent allowance applies to
excavation, transportation, disposal, and backfill volumes. Also, the conversion factor for
converting tons to cubic yards has been specified. This conversion factor is also proposed for
early action excavation amounts specified in Appendix C ofthe proposedrules.
Likewise, the volume ofbackfill allowed to be reimbursed has been specified. The $20
-
per cubic yard figure again includes materials, trucking, equipment and personnel. This figure
does not include costs for a consultant’s oversight ofthe operation.
There will be situations where soil at the excavationmay not be contaminated, but must
be removed to access the contaminated soil. A cost per cubic yard to excavate, stockpile and
replace this soil has been specified to account for these situations. This
$6.50
per cubic yard
figure was obtained from the 2003 National Construction Cost Estimator,
51St
Edition.
-
734.835
—
Sampling Handling and Analysis
-
Proposed Appendix D will set the maximum amounts to be reimbursed forvarious
chemical and physical tests on soil and groundwater. The Illinois EPA met with the Illinois
Association ofEnvironmental Laboratories (IAEL) regarding reasonable reimbursement amounts
forthese types oftests. In response to the Agency’s request, the JAEL provided a survey of
5
labs which is included in Attachment 10. The JAEL suggested the Illinois EPA use the highest
rate reported by any ofthe
5
laboratories. The Illinois EPA rejected this approach. The Illinois
4
EPA instead opted to use the average amounts provided on the IAEL data contained in
Attachment 10. Attachment 11 breaks down how the average amounts provided in Appendix D
were calculated from the IAEL data. The following variations from the IAEL data should also
benoted:
.
-
-
-
1.
The cost per sample for chemical oxygen demand (COD) was based on the
IAEL data forthe biological oxygen demand (BOD) test. It was assumed the cost for
these two tests would be similar. A cost forBOD has not been provided in Appendix D
as this test is not required in most UST applications;
-
-
2.
Dollar amounts on the IAEL table (Appendix 10) were rounded to the next
higher total dollar amount;
3.
A cost for “Iron Total Soil” is included in the Illinois EPA proposal that is
not on the IAEL spreadsheet. The cost ofthis test was assumed to be equal to the test for
“Iron
TCLP Soil,” or $10;
4.
The geotechnical cost forporosity and soil classification are based on
historical results from previous budgets and billing packages reviewed by the Illinois
EPA. The average cost for a porosity test was $30. The average cost for soil
classification was $68.
734.845
—
Professional Consulting Services
This section provides limits for the fees that consultants may be reimbursed for various
tasks conducted as part of Leaking UST remediation. The Illinois EPA has coordinated with the
Consulting Engineers Council ofIllinois (CECI) to develop the activities that are conducted by
the consultant in each step of the process and the estimated personnel time (hours) required for
5
each activity within a task. Once the hours required to perform a task and/or activity were
determined, the Illinois EPA developed an average hourly rate to establish the limits specified in
this section. The Illinois EPA developed an average hourly rate by reviewing the historical
records ofthe Illinois EPA for previous reimbursements. By averaging the maximum hourly
rates for each title in Appendix E ofthe proposed rules, an average hourly rate of$81 .25/hour is
derived as follows:
-
Appendix E
Engineer
$130.00
Geologist
$110.00
-
Scientist
$85.00
-
Project Manager
$100.00
Technician
-
$65.00
Account Technician
$55.00
Administrative Assistant
$45.00
-
Draftsperson
$60.00
Staff Engineer
--
Staff Geologist
--
Total
$650.00
Average
$81.25/hour
In addition, the Illinois EPA randomly selected 19 reimbursement requests to review in
an attempt to determine if the rate was reasonable. This information is summarized in
Attachment 12. This data would indicate an average rate for consultant services around
$68/hour.
-
Using this information, the Illinois EPA determined an average hourly personnel cost of
$80/hour would be used forbudgeting purposes. This figure is roughly 15 higher than the
average derived from the reimbursement requests summarized in Attachment 12. Unless stated
otherwise in the testimony for specific sections, a workday of ten hours was assumed. The limits
specified include all costs incurred by a consultant for completing the specified activity,
-
6
including, but not limited to, project planning and oversight, travel, per diem, mileage,
transportation, lodging, all miscellaneous equipment, as well as the preparation ofplans, reports,
applications forpayment and other documentation. There will be no additional monies provided
if multiple submittals are required to provide the required information.
-
For example, a
consultant may be reimbursed up to $4,800 for the preparation and submission ofthe 20-Day and
45-DayReports, and any amendments or revisions to those reports.
The hours estimated for the various activities discussed were derived in consultation with
the Consulting Engineers Council of Illinois (CECI).
a.
Early Action
—
the proposed fee (allowed if the consultant is involved with
the preparation forthe abandonment or removal ofUSTs) is derived as follows:
-
Personnel —12 hours x $80/hour
=
$960.00
20 and 45-Day Reports
—
the proposed fee forpreparation ofthe 20-Day and 45-
Day Reports is derived as follows:
-
Personnel —60 hours x $80/hour
=
$4,800.00
Free Product Reports
—
the proposed fee is for necessary initial site visit and
-
preparing a Free Product Report forsubmittal. The fee is derived as follows:
-
Personnel —2 people x 1 day x 10 hour day x $80/hour
=
$1,600.00
Free Product Recovery Systems
—
the cost for design, installation, and operation
ofFree Product Recovery Systems will be determined based on a time and material basis,
in accordance with proposed Section 734.850.
7
The final proposed fee specified under this section allows $500 for a Professional
Engineer’s closure certification, if remediation is complete following early action
activities. This fee is derived as follows:
2 hours x $130/hour
=
$260.00
-
The remaining $240 is to cover the additional costs forclerical support, preparation ofthe
Owner/Operator Summary form and recording time and fees forthe No Further
Remediation Letter.
b.
Site/Investigation
—
Stage 1 consulting services will consist ofpreparing to
do the investigation. Originally the Agency had proposed allowing $3,200.00 for all
office and field work associated with Stage 1 activities. The Agency, in its First Errata
Sheet, has modified this approach to allow $1,600.00 for the office preparation for Stage
1 and the field portion will be reimbursed separately. Mr. Bauer will cover the half-day
costs for Stage 1. The fee allowed forconducting this office activity is derived as
follows:
20 hours x $80/hour= $1,600.00
Stage 2 will consist ofpreparing a report ofthe results from the Stage 1
investigation and preparing a Stage 2 investigation plan. The fee for this work was
derived as follows:
40 hours x $80/hour
=
$3,200.00
Stage 3 will consist ofpreparing a report ofthe results from the Stage 2
investigation and a plan forthe Stage 3 investigation. The fee for this work was derived
as follows:
-
-
8
40 hours x $80/hour
=
$3,200.00
-
-
It should be noted the consultant’s fee for Stage 1 includes the field oversight,
whereas the fees for Stage 2 and Stage 3 do not. Since a plan is not required for Stage 1,
it is assumed the time required to develop the plan would be equal to the time required
for field oversight. The consultant’s field oversight costs for Stage 2 and 3 are calculated
using the half-day rate, which Mr. Bauer will discuss.
At the end ofsite investigation activities, a Site Investigation Completion Report
(SICR) will be requiredto summarize the findings of all completed stages ofa site
investigation. Most ofthe office work will have been compensated under the fees
established above. However additional hours may be required to get the necessary
paperwork (certification and final reimbursement application) completed. The additional
fee allowed for this work was derived as follows:
20 hours x $80/hour
=
$1,600.00
In summary, the total consultant fee, which may be paid under the Site
Investigation (if all three stages are conducted) requirements, would be:
Stage 1
$1,600
Stage 2
$3,200
-
Stage 3
$3,200
SICR
$1,600
Total
$9,600
c.
Corrective Action
—
the corrective action requirements will consist ofthe
preparationofthe Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and Budget, the field work associated
with conducting corrective action, the preparation ofthe Corrective Action Completion
Report (CACR) and all reimbursement requests. For conventional technology the rules
9
establish set fees for these activities. The fees established for the office work involved in
developing the CAP and Budget, the CACR and reimbursement submittals for
conventional technology, and a
CACR
for alternative technologies are derived as follows:
64 hours x $80/hour= $5,120
The fees established for the consultant’s field work will be discussedby Mr. Bauer.
The consultant fee reimbursement amount for alternative technologies will be
based on a time and material justification, which will be discussed later.
A consultant would not be entitled to the $5,120 for CAP preparation if no active
remediation will occur. For example if, following a site investigation, the CAP consists
only ofplacing asphalt over the remaining contamination and performing a Part 742
model the reimbursement would be limited to $800 734.845(c)(3) plus the Corrective
Action Completion Report (CACR) costs of$5,120 for a total of $5,920 forthe CAP and
CACR.
Additional monies have been allowed for the consultant’s development ofTier 2
or Tier 3 remediation objectives under 35 Ill. Adm. Code 742 and the preparation of
Environmental Land Use Controls and Highway Authority Agreements as follows:
-
l0hoursx$80/hour=$800.00
-
734.850
—
Payment on Time and Material Basis
-
In developing the reimbursement amounts under Subpart H the Agency realized there
were activities for which a specific set fee could not be developed. This section ofSubpart H
provides a method for developing a budget and reimbursement amount for such activities. The
estimated budgets and reimbursement amounts for the activities will be based on a time and
-
10
materials basis for each site. For example, the development and implementation ofCAPs
proposing alternative technologies will require a breakdown of all proposed activities which do
not have set amounts previously established (e.g., analytical costs listed in Appendix D). It
should be noted the cost forthe alternative technology proposal cannot exceed the cost for
conventional technology or be substantially higher than other available technologies. All plans
and budgets will be reviewed for reasonableness.
Section 734.855
—
Unusual or Extraordinary Expenses
This section provides an opportunity for an owner/operator to demonstrate their site
presents unusual or extraordinary circumstances. Ifthe owner or operator can demonstrate such
circumstances to the Agency, the Agency can allow exceedances ofthe Subpart H amounts on a
site-specific basis.
Section 734.865
—
Increase in Maximum Payment Amounts
Section 734.865 is amended in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet. As amended, this section
will increase the amounts set forth in Subpart H every year based on inflation. The amount ofthe
increase is based upon the annual Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National Product and will be
published by the Agency on, or before, July 1 ofeach year on the Agency’s web site. The annual
adjustment maynot exceed
5
in any one year, and the first adjustment will be effective July 1,
2006. In addition, as always, the Agency or anyone else maypropose changes to the rules at any
time as needed.
The inflation factor used by the Agency in reviewing budget proposals will be based on
the amounts in effect on the date the budget was received. For billing packages not based on an
11
approved budget, the maximum allowable amounts will be based on the date the costs were
incurred.
HAC :jk\Testimony 734.doc
12
ATTACHMENT
1
HARRY
A. CHAPPEL, P.E.
HOME PHONE: 217-529-6330
144 LACONWOOD
WORK PHONE: 217-785-3913
SPRINGFIELD, IL 62707
OVERVIEW
Overtwenty seven years ofexperience in environmental engineering and management.
Includes work with State and Federal laws, regulations and guidance in the areas of water
pollution, solid waste, hazardous waste, and leaking underground storage tanks.
Established the Underground Storage Tank Section in the Bureau ofLand at the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency. This Section grew from a unit offour personnel to a
staff ofover fifty. The budget for this Section exceeded fifteen million dollars annually.
Six years spent in private practice as an environmental consultant and small business
owner. Responsibilities included client relations, job estimating, invoicing, payroll,
personnel, project design, engineering management, and project management.
WORK EXPERIENCE
Private Practice
12/99 to
7/01
Vice President and co-owner of Inland/Chappel Environmental, a
Division ofJi~1andEnvironmental, Inc.
5/95 to 12/99
Vice President and co-owner ofCSD Environmental Services, Inc.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
3/02 to Present
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Unit Manager, Leaking
Underground Storage Tank Section, Bureau ofLand
7/01 to 3/02
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Permit Review
Engineer, Permit Section, Bureau ofLand
9/94 to 5/95
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
—
Manager, Hazardous
Waste Branch, Permit Section, Bureau of Land
6/90 to 9/94
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Manager, Leaking
Underground Storage Tank Section, Bureau ofLand
2/87 to 6/90
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Manager, Compliance
Section, Bureau ofLand
4/83 to 2/87
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Unit Manager, Permit
Section, Bureau ofLand
12/79 to 4/83
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Manager, Permit
Section, Mine Pollution Control Program
9/78 to 12/79
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Permit Review
Engineer, Permit Section, Mine Pollution Control Program
2/76 to 9/78
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Permit Review
Engineer, Permit Section, Bureau of Water
12/75
Graduated from University ofMissouri
Rolla
HARRY A.
CHAPPEL, P.E.
HOME PHONE: 217-529-6330
144 LACONWOOD
WORK PHONE: 217-785-3913
SPRINGFIELD, IL 62707
EDUCATION
B.S.
—
Civil Engineering, University ofMissouri
@
Rolla, December 1975
M.S.
—
Thermal & Environmental Engineering, Southern Illinois University
@
Carbondale, June 1979
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer
IL #062-03895
(current)
MO #EN 028019
(inactive)
OH #E 63580
(inactive)
Asbestos
#100-7207
Management Planner, Project Designer, and
Inspector (current)
AWARDS
Certificate of Commendation
-
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
-
1995
Certificate of Appreciation
—
Bureau of Land
—
1995
H:\IIAC\ RESUME & CMS JNFO\.RESUME 08.2002doc
ATTACHMENT
2
STATE SUMMARIES
JULY 2003
PERSONNEL
STATE
s/HOUR
ADMINISTRATIVE
AZ
$4500
PRINCIPAL LEVEL
AZ
$120.00
WORD PROC/CLERICAL
IND
$28.00
PRINCIPAL
IND
$110.00
WORD PROCESSOR
AZ
$39.00
PRINCIPAL
TEX
$110.00
WORD PROCESSOR
TEX
$35.00
PRINCIPAL
OK
$100.00
CLERICAL
OK
$35.00
SENIOR LEVEL
AZ
$103.00
SR. PROJ. MGR.
IND
$102.00
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
TEX
$110.00
SEN. ENGR./GEOL
TEX
$95.00
PROJECT LEVEL
AZ
$88.00
PROJFCT MANAGER
IND
$83.00
PROJECT MANAGER
TEX
$80.00
ASSOC. ENGRIGEOL.
TEX
$85.00
PROJECT MANAGER
OK
$75.00
STAFF LEVEL
AZ
$74.00
STAFF PROJ. PERS.
IND
$70.00
STAFF GEOLOG/ENGR
TEX
$70.00
FIELD LEVEL
AZ
$62.00
SR. TECHNICIAN
IND
$55.00
FIELD LEVEL
TEX
$65.00
FILED TECH
OK
$45.00
TECHNICAL (CAD,ETC.)
AZ
$55.00
DRAFTING
IND
$35.00
DRAFTING
TEX
$22.5- $50
(DIFFERENT LEVELS)
DRAFTING
OK
$45.00
TECHNICIAN
IND
$38.00
STATE SUMMARIES
JULY 2003
LiST REMOVAL
UNDER1000GAL
IND
PERTANK
$1000.00 (INDADDS$1.34/TONFORLOADING
1000 TO 4999 GAL
IND
PER TANK
$1,500.00 AND $37/MILE FOR TRANSPORT)
5000 TO 10000 GAL
IND
PER TANK
$2,000.00
10000 GAL
IND
PER TANK
$2,500.OQ
OR = 4000 GAL.
AZ
PER TANK
$5852.00 (AZ ADDS $4 TO $12/MILE FOR TRANSPORT
AZ
ADDL TANK
$2,978.00 DEPENDING ON SIZE OF TANK)
4000X15000
GAL
AZ
PER TANK
$11,183.00
AZ
ADDL TANK
$5,722.00
15000 GAL
AZ
PER TANK
$12,838.00
AZ
ADDL TANK
$7,988.00
5000 GAL OR LESS
TEX
PER TANK
$1,000.00 (MAX $8,000)
GREATER THAN 5000 GAL
TEX
PER TANK
$2,000.00 (MAN $8,000)
BORINGS
HOLLOW STEM AUGER
AZ
PER FT.
$22.00
AIR ROTARY
AZ
PER FT.
$38.00
16 FT
IND
PER FT.
$20.00
16 TO 26 FEET
IND
PER FT.
$25.00
26 FT
(ND
PER FT.
$30.00
2INCHAUGER
COLO
PERFT.
$16.41
4 INCH AUGER
COLO
PER FT.
$19.15
2 INCH ROTARY
COLO
PER FT.
$21.06
2 INCH ROTARY
COLO
PER FT.
$27.35
2 INCH HOLLOW ST.
TEX
0-25 FT
$775.00 ($31/FT @25 FT)
10 INCH
OK
PER FT.
$21.00 (+MOB, +DECON, ÷MILEAGE)
PUSH-PULL PROBE
OK
PER DAY
$1,400.00 (*108, +DECON4, +MILEAGE)
BORING (PUSH OR DRILL)
SC
PER FT.
$17.00 (÷MOB)
STATE SUMMARIES
JULY 2003
WELLS
2 INCH HOLLOW STEM
AZ
PER FT.
$38.00
4 INCH HOLLOW STEM
AZ
PER FT.
$47.00
2 INCH AIR ROTARY
AZ
PER FT.
$54.00
4 INCH AIR ROTARY
AZ
PER FT.
$63.00
2 INCH
IND
PER FT.
$10.00
4 INCH
IND
PER FT.
$12.00
2 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$15.14
4 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$21.67
2 INCH
TEX
0-25 FT
$1,025.00 ($41/FT @25 FT) INCLUDES BORING
4 INCH
TEX
0- 25FT
$1,187.50 ($47.5/FT @25 FT) INCLUDES BORING
2 INCH OR 4 INCH
OK
PER FT.
$32.00 (i-MOB, +DECON, i-MILEAGE)
DIRECT PUSH
TEX
PER FOOT
$12.50 (195 FT IN 10 HOUR DAY)
DIRECT PUSH
TEX
PER DAY
$1,480.00 (195 FT IN 10 HOUR DAY)
ABANDON 2 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$7.47
ABANDON 4 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$11.08
0-25 FEET DEEP
TEX .
PER WELL
$300.00
ANY WELL
OK
PER WELL
$300.00 (-‘-MOB, +DECON, i-MILEAGE)
WELL INSTALL
SC
PER FT.
$38.00 (i-MOB)
STATE SUMMARIES
JULY 2003
REMEDIATION
EXCAVATION
AZ
$/CY
$11.00
EXCAVATION
IND
$/CY
$1.50
EXCAVATION
TEX
$/CY
$9.00
TRANSPORT
AZ
$/CY
$12.00 (1.5 TON/CY)
TRANSPORT
IND
$/CY
$0.90 (1.5 TON/CY)
TRANSPORT
TEX
$/CY
$14.00
SOIL DISPOSAL
TEX
StY
$45.00
BACKFILL & COMPACTION
AZ
$/CY
$13.35 (1.5 TON/CY)
BACKFILL & COMPACTION
TEX
$/CY
$20.00 ($11- BACKFILL = $9 COMPACT)
DISPOSAL
IND
LF RATES
DISPOSAL
TEX
$/CY
10.5 (1SOOTPH)
TEX
$/CY
$45.00 (1500TPH)
SOIL TREAT/DISP
SC
$/CY
$33.33 ($50/TON) (i-MOB)
BACKFILL - STONE
IND
$/CY
$8.67 (1.5 TON/CY)
IND ADDS $.26/CY/MILE
BACKFILL - SOIL
(ND
$/CY
$4.34 (1.5 TONICY)
DRUM DISPOSAL - SOIL
AZ
PER DRUM
$308.00
DRUM DISPOSAL - SOIL
AZ
PER DRUM
$134.00
DRUM DISPOSAL - SOIL
OK
1ST DRUM
$200.00 ($65 EACH ADD. DRUM)
DRUM DISPOSAL - WATER
OK
1ST DRUM
$200.00 ($2/GALLON THEREAFTER)
FLUID DISPOSAL
TEX
PER GAL
$0.40
VAC TRUCK
TEX
PER HOUR
$75.00
OK
PER GAL
$0.45
ATTACHMENT
3
ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY
State Assurance Fund 2003 Cost Ceilings
Cost
Ceiling
2003 Cost
Item
Ceiling
Costs
Item Description
Unit of Measure Amount
*
T & M Time & Material Detail. See
2003
Cost Ceiling Descriptions.
SUPPLEMENTAL UNIT RATES
PERSONNEL RATES
I
Professional
Services
Rates:
Principal
Level
S/flouT
$124
2
Professional Services Rates: Senior Level
S/Hour
$107
3
Professional Services Rates: Project Level
S/Hour
$91
4
Professional Services Rates: Staff Level
S/Hour
$76
S
Professional Services Rates: Field Level
S/Hour
$64
6
Professional Services Rates: Technical Personnel (Computer Included)
S/Hour
$56
7
Professional Services Rates: Administrative Assistant
S/Hour
$47
8
Professional Services Rates: Word Processor (Computer Included)
S/Hour
$40
CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACTING PERSONNEL RATES
9
Construction/Contracting Services
Rates:
Construction Field Supervisor
S/Hour
$81
10
Construction/Contracting Services Rates: Skilled Laborer
S/Hour
$5!
ii
Construction/Contracting Services Rates: Unskilled Laborer
Construction/Contracting Services Rates; Equipment Operator
S/Hour
$40
12
(Avit. Rate to Operate a Std. Piece ofEquip)
S/Hour
$60
PER DIEM RATES
13
Per Diem Requirement (U Miles Required)
50
Miles
14
Fieldwork_Per_Diem_Without_Overnight_Stay
S/Day
$40
IS
Fieldwork Per Diem With Overnight Stay (Inct. Lodging)
L
S/Day
$106
CONSULTANT MILEAGE RATE
16
Consultant Mileage Rate (single person)
S/Mile
$2
17
Consultant Mileage Rate (two persons)
S/Mile
$4
PROJECT SET-UP AND ADMINISTRATION
IS
Initial Project Set-up
Lump Sum
$1,015
19
PreviousLy Assessed Project Review
Lump Sum
$1,873
20
Agency Data Analysis
Lump Sum
$1,586
21
Site Reconnaissance and Field Receptor Survey 11/4 Milej
Lump Sum
$1,612
22
Agency Receptor Survey jI/4 Mile
Lump Sum
$1016
23
Historical Research
Lump Sum
$1363
24
Pursuit of Off-Site Access Agreement
with
a Private
Entity
Only
Lump Sum
$1,260
Page 1
of
8
WORK PLAN PREPARATION
25
Approved Site Characterization Work Plan Scenario t~Soil Only
S/Report
$3,980
26
Approved Site Characterization Work Plan Scenario
2:
Soil and Groundwater
Initial Health and Safety Plan
S/Report
$5,206
27
S/Report
$703
REMEDIAL PLANS
28
fADEQ-Approved CAP for Active Remedial Treatment
29
IADEQ-Approved CAP for Natural Attenuation
Per CAP
$7,095
Per CAP
$6,866
30
Pre-Suilt Remedial Engineering Design
Per Design
$5983
31
4
Consultant Preparation ofSAF Work Plan to Implement approved CAP
Per Plan
$3,809
32
j
Remediation Health & Safety Plan
Per Plan
$1,153
FIELD ACTIVITIES
33
Consultant’s Full Day
Rate
DO NOT USE
34
Consultant’s Half Day Rate
DO NOT USE
CONTRACTOR UST REMOVAL AND CLOSURI
35
Contractor Mobilizatioa/Deniobilization
Per Event
$720
36
Contractor Mobilization/Demobilization Incremental Travel Rate
Per Mile
$5
37
Contractor Daily Travel Costs
Per Mile
$5
(ST
REMOVAL
38
One UST Less than or Equal to 4,000-gallons
Per Tank
$6,047
39
Cost for Each Additional Tank
Per Tank
$3,077
40
One LIST Greater than 4,000-gallons and Less than or Equal to 15,000-gallons
Per Tank
$11,556
41
Cost for Each Additional Tank
Per Tank
$5,913
42
One liST Greater than 15,000-gallons
Per Tank
$13,265
43
Cost for Each Additional Tank
Per Tank
$8,254
OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION OF TANKS
44
One LIST Less Than or Equal to 4,000-gallons
*T & M
45
Cost for Each Additional Tank
‘T & M
46
One liST Greater thai, 4,000-gallons aad Less than or Equal to 15,000-gallons
T & M
47
Cost for Each Additional Tank
aT & M
48
One liST Greater than 15,000-gallons
T & M
49
Cost for Each Additional Tank
T & M
CONTRACTOR DRILLING-RELATED ACTIVITIES
SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING Mobilization/Demobilization
Page 2 of B
50
Hollow
Stem Auger Drilling Method
Per Event
$515
SI
All other Drilling Methods
Per Event
$611
SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING TRAVEL RATE
L
52
Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Method
J
Per Mile
$4
53
All other Drilling Methods
Per Mile
$5
54
Soil Boring and Sampling Travel Rate
L
Per Mile
$4
SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING
55
Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Method-Vertical Boring
Per
Foot
$22
56
Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Method-Angle
Boring
Per
Foot
$29
57
Limited Access Drilling Method-Vertical Boring
Per
Foot
$37
58
Air Rotary Drilling Method-Vertical Boring
Per
Foot
$39
59
Rotosonic DriIlin2 Method-Vertical Boring
Per
Foot
$43
60
Dual Wall Percussion Drilling Method-Vertical Boring
Per
Foot
$42
6!
Dual Wall Percussion Drilling Method-Angle Boring
Per Foot
$60
62
Soil Boring Abandonment by Grout fall boring diametersj
Per Foot
$11
CONTRACTOR STANDBY
RATE
63
IlollowStem Auger
T& M
64
All OtherRigTypes
T&M
CONTRACTOR WELL INSTALLATION-RELATED ACTIVITIES
WELL INSTALLATION
65
2 inch Hollow Stem Auger
PerFoot
$39
66
4-inch Hollow Stem Auger
Per Foot
$49
67
6-inch Hollow Stem Auger
Per Foot
$68
68
2-inch Air Rotary
PerFoot
$56
69
4-inchAir Rotary
Per Foot
$65
70
6-inch Air Rotary
Per Foot
$87
71
2-inch Rotosonic
Per Foot
$63
72
4-inch Rotosonic
Per Foot
$66
73
6-inch Rotosonic
Per Foot
$82
74
2-inch Dual ~VaJIPercussion
Per Foot
$58
J
75
4-inch Dual Wall Percussion
Per Foot
$69
76
~inch Dual Wall Percussion
Per Foot
$89
77
Surface Completion / Access Vault
12”
S/Well
$307
78
Surface Completion / Access Vault 12” to a24”
S/Well
$518
MONITOR WELL DEVELOPMENT
79
Contractor MobilizationiDemobilization
Per Event
$499
80
Contractor Travel Cost
PerMile
$3
8!
2-inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Less Than
100
Feet
$/Well
$484
82
2-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Tliaa
100
Feet
S/Well
$601
Page 3
of&
83
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Less Than 100 Feet
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Than 100 Feet
6-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Less Than 100 Feet
S/Well
$523
84
S/Well
$630
85
S/Well
$642
86
6-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or GreaterThan
100
Feet
S/Well
$739
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING
-
RELATED ACTIVITIES
87
Consultant Make Ready
5T & M
88
Groundwater Monitoring Field Equipment Day Rate (Purging~
9’ & M
89
Groundwater Monitoring Field Equipment Day Rate (Non-Purgiogj
9’ & M
90
2-inch Monitor Welt: Depth to Water Less Than 100 Feet IPurgingi
T & M
91
2-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to WatCr Equal To
or
Greater Than
100
Feet
~Purgingj
•T & M
92
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to WatCr Less Than 100 Feet IPurgingj
‘T & M
93
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to WatCr Equal To or Greater Than
100
Feet
JPurgingj
~T & M
94
6-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Less Than 100 Feet fPurging~
9’ & M
95
6-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to WatCr Equal To or Greater Than
100
Feet IPurgingj
•T & M
96
Investigative Sampling Methodology
jPurging is not requiredj All depths to
water
•T & M
97
Consultant Fluid Level Monitoring
•T & M
98
Free Product Removal Via Hand Bailing or Hand Pumping
T & M
99
Free Product Removal Via Dedicated Removal Device
9’ & M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY TESTING
IOU
Aquifer Pump Test
T& M
101
Aquifer Slug Test
5T & NI
102
Soil VaporExtraction Test
T& M
103
SVE/Air Sparge Test
5T & M
104
Bioremediation Test
T& M
RENIEDIATION ACTIVITIES
105
Remedial Excavation
Per Cubic Yard
$12
106
Bulk Soil Transportation
T & M_________
107
Backfill and Compaction Excavation
S/Ton
$20
108
Containerized Contaminated Waler Disposal
Per Drum
$139
109
Containerized Contaminated Soil LI isposal
Per Drum
-
$318
110
WasteCharacterization
*
T &
M
III
Landfill Disposal of Petroleum Contaminated Soil (PCS)
S/Ton
$40
112
Thermal Remediation of PCS (Es-Situ, On-Site, Portable Facility)
S/Ton
$54
113
Thermal Remediation of PCS (Es-Situ, Off-Site, Fixed Facility)
S/Ton
$34
114
Bioremediation of FCS (Off-Site, Fised Facility)
S/Ton
$36
115
Construction and Installation of Soil and/or Groundwater Remedial System
DO NOT USE
116
Consultant Cost: Remediation System Operation and Maintenance
S/Month
$2,142
REPORTING ACTIVITIES
Page4
of8
117
14-Day Release Confirmation Report
j
Per Report
I
$551
I
ADEQ-APPROVED STANDARD SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT (5CR)
118
ADEQ-Approved SCR; Up To 4 Soil Borings
S/Report
$4,170
119
ADEQ-Approwed Standard SCR; Incremental Cost Increase Per Soil Boring
S/Boring
$291
120
ADEQ-Approved Standard 5cR; Up To 4 Groundwater Monitor Wells
S/Report
$5,181
121
ADEQ-Approved Standard 5CR; Incremental Cost Increase
Per Groundwater Monitor Well
S/Well
$320
122
ADEQ-Approved Standard 5CR; Up to4 Soil Borings and
4 Groundwater Monitor Wells
S/Report
$6,012
REMEDIAL REPORTS
123
First Periodic Groundwater Monitoring Report: Up to 4 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
(Includes first sampling event)
S/Report
$2458
124
Initial Periodic Monitoring Report; Incremental Cost for Each Additional
Groundwater Monitor Well
Per Well
$183
125
Subsequent Groundwater Monitoring Report: Up To 4 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
(Includes_subsequent sampling_events)
S/Report
$1,625
126
Subsequent Periodic Monitoring Report; Incremental Cost for Each Additional
Groundwater Monitor Well
Per Well
$159
127
Initial Remedial Progress Report (Soil and Groundwater)
S/Report
$2,846
128
Subsequent Remedial Progress Report (Soil and Groundwater)
S/Report
$2,025
129
Post Remediation Closure Report
S/Report
$3,803
130
Site Dc-Commissioning Letter Report
S/Report
$1,320
SAF APPLICATION PREPARATION
131
Pre-approval Application
Per Application
si,ooi
132
Reimbursement/Direct Pay Application (Less than or Equal to 2 Primary Invoices)
Per Application
$919
133
Reimbursement/Direct Pay Application IGreater than 2 Less than or Equal to
5
Primary
Invoices)
PerApplication
$1,108
134
Reimbursement/Direct Pay Application (Greater than or Equal to 6 Primary Invoices)
Per Application
$1,348
EQUIPMENT RENTAL RATES
135
SVE System with Thermal Oxidizer (100 cfm)
S/Month
$3224
136
SVE System with Thermal Oxidizer (250 cfm)
S/Month
$3,962
137
SVE System with Thermal Oxidizer (500 cfm)
S/Month
$4,587
138
SVE System With Thermal Oxidizer 700 cfmj
S/Month
$5,515
139
SVE System with Catalytic Oxidizer (100 cfm)
S/Month
$3,261
140
SVE System with Catalytic Oxidizer (250 cfm)
S/Month
$4,206
141
SVE System with Catalytic Oxidizer (500 cfaz)
S/Month
$4,995
142
Air Sparge System lup to 100 cfm and up to 12 psi)
S(Month
$1,013
143
Air Sparge System ~upto 100 din and 13 psi to lOll psi)
S/Month
$1,278
444
145
SVE/Air Sparge Portable Pilot Test Unit
Blower, 160 CFM
T&M
S/Month
$1,040
146
Blower, 280 CFM
S/Month
$1,333
147
Manual-Operated Band Auger Sampling Kit (Hand Anger/Brass Sleeves)
S/Day
$67
Page5 of8
I
148
150
Gallon
DOT-approved
Drum
I
S/Drum
I
$~9 I
LABORATORY RATES
MOBILE LABORATORY RATES
149
MobIle Lab
Mobllizatioa/Demobllizatlon Rate
for a One Person Crew
Per Event
$561
150
Mobile Lab Mobilization/Demobilization Rate for a Two Person Crew
Per Event
5390
151
Mobile
Lab -
MobilIzatIon/Demobilization Incremental Travel Rate for aOne
PersonCrew
PerMile
$2
152
Mobile
Lab -
Mobillration/Demobilzation Incremental Travel Rate for a
Two
Person
Crew
PerMile
$2
153
On-Site Mobile Lab Rate for a One Person Crew (Includes Soil and 6W analyses)
S/Hour
$174
154
On-Site Mobile Lab Rate for a
Two Person Crew
(Includes Soil and 6W analyses)
S/flour
$259
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
155
Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
by ADHS Method 418.1 AZ (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$71
156
Hydrocarbons by
ADDS
Method
SOI5AZRI
(Soil Only)
S/Sample
$94
I
158
I
Hydrocarbons/BTEX by EPA Method 8OI5AZRI(Modifiedj/8021B (Air Only)
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
Aromatic VOC’s (BTEX) By EPA Method8021B (Soil Only)
Ilalogenated
VOC’s (BTEX) by EPA Method SO2IB Arizona Target Compounds (Soil
Only)
EPA Method SOZIB; Arizona Target Compounds (Soil On’y)
Full List VOC’s by EPA Method
8021B
(Soil Only)
Aromatic VOC’s
(BTEX)
by EPA Method 8021B (Groundwater Only)
Halogenated VOC’s
(BTEX) by
EPA Method 8021B Arizona Target Compounds
(Groundwater Only)
EPA Method 8021B; Arizona Target Compounds (Groundwater Only)
Full List YOGa by EPA
Method
8021B (Groundwater Only)
167
I Aromatic
YOCs (BTEX) by EPA Method 8021B (Air Only)
I
S/Sample
I
5143
I
168
)
Halogenated VOCs by EPA Method 8021B
Arizona
Target Compounds (Air Only)
IT S/Simple
T
$177
I
I
EPA Method
8260B; Arizona Target
Compounds (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$223 — I
110
I
Full List VOCs by EPA Method 8260B (Soil Only)
~j -
S/Sample
I
$239
I
169
Ill
EPA Method 826DB; Arizona Tartet Compounds (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$225
112
Full List VOCa by EPA Method 8260B (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$240
POLYT4UCLEAR AROMOATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHa)
113
Semi-Volatile Organles by EPA Method 8270C
-
base neutral (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$234
114
Semi-Volatile Organics by EPA Method
8270C -
base neutral (Groundwater Only)
~ample
$253
115
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PADs) by EPA Method 8310 (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$176
116
Poiynuelear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PADs) by EI’A Method
8310 (Groundwater Only)
5/Sample
$174
WASTE CHARACTERIZATION ANALYSIS
I
157
I Hydrocarbons by ADDS Method SOI5AZRI-Modilled (Air Only)
I
S/Sample
$107
I
~$t~mple 1
th9 1
S/Saj~pIe
$94
S/S amplc
S/Sample
$135
S/Sample
$160
$209
S/Sample
$98
S/Sample
S/Sample
$141
S/Sample
$165
$202
Page 6of 8
171
TPH by EPA Method 418.1 (Groundwater Only) - FOR WASTE
CHARACTERIZATION AND PERMIT REQUIREMENT PURPOSES ONLY
TCLP Extraction Lead (Pb) Aaalysis by EPA Method t311 and the appropriate SW846
EPA Method
S/Sample
$75
178
S/Sample
$113
179
TCLP Extraction by EPA Method 1311 - Analysis ofS RCRA Metals by appropriate
SW846 EPA Method
S/Sample
$254
180
lgnitability Test by EPA Method 1010 (Liquid Only)
Ignitnbility Test by EPA Method 1010 Modified (Soil Only)
Corrositivity p0 by EPA Method 9045 (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$46
181
S/Sample
$47
182
S/Sample
$20
183
Corrositivity pH by EPA Method 9040 (GW Only)
S/Sample
$19
184
Paint Filter Free Liquids by EPA Method 9095
S/Sample
$21
185
PCB’s by EPA Method 8082 (Soil Onlyj
S/Sample
Sill
186
Lend (Pb) by an approved SW846 EPA Method (Soil Only)
$~Sample
$35
BIOFEASIBILITY / BIOTREATABILITY ANALYSIS
t87
Phosphate-P by an approved EPA/ASTM Method (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$33
188
Nitrate
+
nitrite-N by an approved EPAJASTM Method (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$42
189
Nitrogen (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$44
190
Alkalinity by EPA Method 310.! (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$21
191
Total Organic Carbon by EPA Method 415.1
S/Sample
$51
192
Total Organic Carboo by EPA Method 9060
S/Sample
$64
193
Ammonia by EPA Method 350.3 or other ASTM Method (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$30
194
Sulfate by EPA Method 375.2 or other ASTM Method (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$26
195
Nitrate by EPA Method 353.2 (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$26
196
Alkalinity by EPA Method 310.1 Modified (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$22
197
Total Dissolved Solids by EPA Method 160.1
S/Sample
$20
198
Total Dissolved Solids by EPA Method 160.3
S/Sample
$19
199
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (ROD) by EPA Method 405.4
(Aqueous
Matrices Only)
S/Sample
$48
200
Release ReportingForm
T& M
201
Conformed Release 14-day Report
T& NI
202
(nitial Siw Characterization Report
T & M
203
LUST Site Classification Form
•T & M
204
FreeProduct Repon
T & M
205
LUST Site CharacterIzation Report
T & M
206
NoticeofSoil Remediation Form
T & M
207
Corrective Action Plan
T & M
208
Periodic Site Status Report (Soil Only)
T & M
209
Periodic Site Status Report (Soil and Groundwater)
‘T & M
240
Corrective Action Completion Report
T & M
NOTES:
Source - Btnao of Labor of Siatisucs Product, Poke It
for Fn’shcd Goods Less Food
sod
Eneraj’Not Seasonally Adjusted.
Unadjusled percent change ior Fiscal
Year
2002 (July 2001 through June 2002).
Page
7
of a
ATTACHMENT
4
TITLE 328 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FINANCIAL ASSURANCE BOARD
ARTICLE 1.
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM
THE EXCESS LIABILITY TRUST FUND
Rule 1.
Definitions and References
328 IAC 1-I-I
Application of definitions
Authority: IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-I 1-2; IC 13-23
Sec. I. The definitions in Ic 13-1 1-2 apply to this article. In addition to the definitions in IC 13-1 1-2, the definitions in this
rule apply throughoutthis article.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328JAC 1-1-1;fiIedDec 4, 1992, 11:00
am~:16 JR 1051; readoptedfiled Jan 10, 2001, 321p.m.: 24 JR 1534; filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR
787)
328 IAC 1-1-2
“Administrator” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec.
2.
“Administrator” refers
to
the administrator
of
the fund.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328
1-IC /-/-2;filed Dec 4, 1992, 11:00a.m.: I6JR /051; readoptedfiledJan 10,200/, 3:2/pin.: 24JR 1534;filed Oct 17. 2001,4:30
p.m.: 25 IR 787)
328
IAC 1-1-3
“Corrective action” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 3. “Corrective action” means action taken to minimize, contain, eliminate, remediate, mitigate, or clean up a release,
including emergency measures taken as part ofan initial response to the release under rules ofthe solid waste management board
at 329 (AC 9-5-2.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 IAC 1-l-3;filed Dec 4, 1992, 11:00a.m.: 16 JR
/05/: i’eadoptedfiled Jan (0, 200/, 3:21 p.m.: 241R 1534;filed Oct /7, 200?, 4:30 p.m.: 2511? 787)
328
IAC 1-1-3.1 “Corrective action plan” or “CAP” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-7; IC 13-23-8-3
Sec. 3.1. “Corrective action plan” or “CAP” means the corrective action plan described by rules of the solid waste
management board at 329 IAC 9-5-7(a) and 329 IAC 9-5-7(b).
(Underground Storage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 IAC
/-I-3./;ju/t’dOc/ /7, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 251R 788)
328 (AC 1-1-4
“Deductible amount” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; (C 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-7; IC 13-23-8-3
Sec. 4. “Deductible amount” means the amount set forth in IC 13-23-8-3 applicable to each incident number assigned by the
department. A person applying to the fund under 328 IAC 1-3-I must provide evidence of payment ofthe deductible amount under
IC I 3-23-8-4(a)(3).
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financia/Assurance Board; 328/AC 1-l-4;Juled Dec 4, 1992, 11:00a.m.: 161R
/05/;Ji/edian 9, /997, 4:00p.m.: 201R 1103; readoptedfiledJan10, 2001, 3:21 p.m.: 24 JR 1534;f:led Oct17, 2001, 4:30p.m.:
25 JR 788)
328 IAC I-I-S
“Department” defined (Repealed)
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 1
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Sec.
5. (Repealed by UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 803)
328 IAC 1-1-5.1 “Emergency measures” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-II-i
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 5.1. “Emergency measures” means any action that is taken at or near a petroleum release to abate an immediate threat
ofharm to human health, property, orthe environment. The actions taken must be approved by the department priorto payment from
the fund.
(Underground Storage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC 1-1-5.1;fzled Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 788)
328 IAC 1-1-6
“Fund” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-7-I; IC 13-23-8
Sec. 6. “Fund” means the underground petroleum storage tank excess liability trust fund established at IC 13-23-7-I.
(Underground Storage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 JAC 1-1-6;filed Dec 4, 1992, 11:00 a. m.: 16 JR 105/; filedJan 9,
/997, 4:00 p.m.: 20/1? /103; readoptedfiledJan JO, 2001, 3:21 p.m.: 24JR 1534;filed Oct17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 251R 788)
328 IAC
1-1-7
“Occurrence” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 7. “Occurrence” means an incident that results in a release of petroleum, including a continuous or repeated release of
petroleum, from an
underground storagetank system.
(Undergroundstorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC l-?-7;fit’ed
Dec 4, 1992, ?l:OOa.m.: 16?R 105!; readopredfi/edJan /0, 200!, 3:21p.m.: 241R /534;filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 251R
788)
328 MC 1-1-8
“Reasonable
costs” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-1 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 8. “Reasonable costs” means a monetary amount or range, as determined by the department, which is commensurate with
a corrective action when the corrective action was taken. Reasonable costs shall be determined by the department by a review of
the following:
(I) The activities outlined in the approved or deemed approved corrective action plan and those activities in fact performed.
(2) The approved site characterization and those activities in fact performed.
(3) The emergency measures and those activities in fact performed.
(4) The scope, complexity, and timing of the corrective action activities.
(5)
The fair market value of the costs for services or goods within the particular market or industry where the work is
performed as provided, in part, in 328 IAC
1-3-5(c).
(1.m/ergroun~1Storage Tank Financial Assurance Board: 328 1.-IC l-1-8;filed Dec 4, 1992. 11:00 am.: 1611? 1051;filed Nov 1,
/995. 8:30 am.: /9 JR 332; readoptedfiled Jan 10, 2001, 3:2/ p.m.: 24 JR /534; filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 2511? 788)
328
IAC
1-1-8.5 “Site characterization” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 8,5, “Site characterization” meansthe initial site characterization described in rules ofthe solid waste management board
at 329 (AC 9-5-5.1 and investigations described in 329 IAC 9-5-6 and may include, as necessary, quarterly monitoring and pilot
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 2
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
studies to determine the feasibility of remediation alternatives.
(Underground Storage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 /AC
l-1-8.5;fzled Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 2511? 788)
328 IAC
1-1-9
“Substantial
compliance” defined
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-8-4
Sec. 9. “Substantial compliance” means that, at the time a release was discovered, the owner or operator hadtaken affirmative
steps to comply with the requirements ofIC
13-23-8-4.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 IAC 1-1-9;
filed Dec 4, 1992, 11:00 am.: 16 JR 1052;filed Nov 1, 1995, 8:30 am.: 19 JR 343; readoptedfiledJan 10, 2001, 3:21p.m.: 24
JR 1534;filed Oct17, 200), 4:30p.m.: 25/1? 789)
328 IAC 1-1-10 “Third party liability” defined
Authority; IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 10. “Third party liability” is the damage a tank owner or operator is legally obligated to pay for injury, expense, and
damage suffered by a third party as the result of a release. Third party liability includes bodily injury and property damage. Third
party liability does not include punitive orexempiary
damages.
(Underground Storage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC
J-)-10:filed Dcc 4. 1992, 11:00a.m.: 1611? 1052; readopiedfiledJan 10, 2001, 3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30
p.m.: 25 JR 789)
328 MC
I-I-Il
Incorporation by reference (Repealed)
Sec. II.
(Repealed by UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; filed Oct 17, 200/, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 803)
Rule 2.
Scope and Fund Management
328 (AC 1-2-I
Applicability
Authority; IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected;
IC 13-23
Sec.
I.
This article implements provisions of IC 13-23 for the administration of the fund. This article establishes procedures
by
which persons listed in 328 IAC 1-3-I may apply to the fund for payment ofcorrective action costs andthird party liability claims
arising from petroleum releases. Payment ofcorrective actioncosts and third party liability claims shall be made in accordance with
the following:
(1)328 IAC 1-3-4(b) applies to anyone (I) site, upon which:
(A an occurrence has not been reported to the department; or
(B) the corrective action has not been completed as of the effective date of this rule.
12) The cost range or amount of the expenditure lobe reimbursed by the fund, as set forth in 328 IAC 1-3-5, shall be
determined as of the date the expense was initially incurred by the applicant to the fund,
(LndcrgroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 IAC l-2-/;JIled Dec 4, /992, 11:00a.m.: 16/R 1052; readoptedfiled
Jan /0, 200/, 3:21p.m.: 24/R 1534;filed Oct /7, 200/, 4:30p.m.: 2511? 789.)
328 MC 1-2-2
Fund management
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 2. The administrator ofthe fund shall prepare an annual report to the financial assuranceboard by September 1 of each
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 3
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
year. The report shall include the following:
(I) A financial statement detailing information for the management andoversight of the fund, including facts concerning the
amount of money currently in the fund, the amount of money obligated for correctiveactions and third party liability claims,
and estimates of future revenue for and demands on the fund.
(2) An overview of the fund claims process.
(3) A reportof the number of claims made against the fund that were approved anddenied during the reporting year.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 IAC l-2-2;fi/ed Dec 4, 199Z 11:00am.: /6JR 1052; readoptedfiled
Jan 10, 2001, 3:21 p.m.: 24 JR 1534:/iled Oct 17. 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 789)
328 IAC
1-2-3
Obligation ormonies
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected: IC 13-23
Sec. 3. (a) Claims shall be paid in the order received by the department unless the procedure set forth in 328 IAC 1-4-1 is
applicable.
(b) At the beginning of each state fiscal year, the administrator shall obligate sufficient monies for administering the fund.
This amount shall
be
approved by the financial assurance board.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Anancia/Assurance Board; 328/AC
!-2-3;filed Dec 4, /992, 11:00a.m.: I6JR 1052;fi/ed May 25, /999. 4:31 p.m.: 22 JR 3/03; readoptedfiledJan /0, 200/, 3:21
p.m.: 2411? /534;fsled Oct 17, 200/, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 789)
Rule 3.
Fund
Coverage and
Eligibility
328 IAC 1-3-I
Fund access
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-7; IC 13-23-8-4
Sec. I. The following persons may apply to the fund for payment of expenditures arising from corrective action and for
indemnification of third party liability:
(I) Eligible tank owners and operators, including transferees as described in IC 13-23-8-4.
(21 Persons assigned the right of reimbursement by any person described in subdivision (I).
(3) Subsequent owners ofthe property upon which tanks were located, ifthe tanks were closed by a previous property owner,
tank owner, or operator who is eligible.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 /AC 1-3-1; filed Dec 4, 1992, 11:00 am.: /6/k 1053;fe/edJan 9,
/997, 4:00 p.m.: 201R 1/03; readoptedfi/ed Jan /0, 2001, 3:21p.m.: 24/k /534;filed Oct /7, 200/, 4:30p.m.: 25/R 790)
328 MC 1-3-2
Fund coverage
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-8-4; IC 13-23-9-2; (C 13-23-9-3
Sec. 2. (a) Monies may be disbursed from the fund to persons listed in section I of this rule, for payment ofcorrective action
costs in compliance with IC 13-23-8-4(a)(4) through IC 13-23-8-4(c) and IC 13-23-9-2(a) through IC 3-23-9-2(c). Site
characterization costs may be disbursed from the fund to persons listed in section 1 of this rule prior to an approved or deemed
approved CAP, if the work for which payment is sought is completed in accordance with rules of the solid waste management hoard
at 329 AC 9 or the risk integrated system of closure (RISC) standards.
(b) Monies may be disbursed to persons listed in section I of this rule for payment of claims of liability to third parties in
compliance with IC 13-23-9-3.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financia/Assurance Board; 328 JAC /-3-2:JiledDec 4, /992, 11:00
a.m.: /6/P /053: readoptedfiledJan /0, 200/, 3:21p.m.: 24/k 1534;filed Oct /7,200/, 4:30p.m.: 25/k 790)
Indiana Administrative Code
.
Page 4
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
328
IAC 1-3-3
Eligibility requirements
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-84.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 6-8.1-10-1; IC 13-23-7; IC 13-23-8-4; IC 13-23-12
Sec. 3. (a) Persons Listed in section 1 of this rule must do the following to be eligible for reimbursement from the fund:
(I) Meet the requirements set forth in IC 13-23-8-4(a)(1) through IC 13-23-8-4(a)(4).
(2) In accordance with rules of the solid waste management board at 329 IAC 9-4 and rules of the water pollution control
board at 327 IAC 2-6.1, communicate a spill report to the department of environmental management.
(3) Current tank owners or operators who have failed to pay all tank fees that are due under IC 13-23-12-I by the date that
the fees are due shall be eligible for reimbursement from the fund in accordance with subsection (b) upon payment ofall past
due fees, interest, and penalties.
(4) A person who acquires ownership in accordance with subsection (e) shall be eligible for reimbursement from the fund
upon timely payment of all past due tank fees, inteTest, and penalties in accordance with subsection (Ii).
(b) A tank owneror operator who fails to pay all tank fees that are due under IC 13-23-12-I by the date that the fees are due
shall be eligible for reimbursement from the fund according to the following formula:
(I) Determine the number ofpayments that were owed under IC 13-23-12-I on all regulated tanks at the facility from which
a release occurred, beginning with the date that the fees for each tank first became due under IC 13-23-12 and continuing until
the date on which the release occurred.
(2) Determine the number of payments actually made under IC 13-23-12-I on all regulated tanks at the facility from which
a release occurred, beginning with the date each tank became regulated under IC 13-23 and continuing until the date on which
the release occurred. Divide the number of payments actually made by the number of payments due as determined in
subdivision (1).
(3) Determinethe amount of money the person would have received from the fund if all payments due on the datethe release
occurred had been paid when due, and multiply the amount by:
(A) the percentage determined in subdivision (2), if the percentage is fifty percent (50) or more; or
(H) zero (0), ifthe percentage determined in subdivision (2) is less than fifty percent
(50).
(c) Payments that were made or could have been paid four (4) times per year under IC 13-23-12-3 count as one (I) payment
for purposes of this section. Eachpayment made or due on each tank at a facility shall count as an additional payment for purposes
of this section in figuring the total payments made or due.
(d) Persons listed in section I ofthis rule who have had a claim denied for failure to registeran underground petroleum storage
tank from which a release has occurred or for failure to pay all registration fees that are due under IC 13-23-12-1 by the date the
fees are due may resubmit the claim, regardless of whether the denial was appealed, under subsection (a). The resubmission must
be in the form of a letter providingthe facility identification number, the incident numbeT, and, if an appeal was filed, a copy of a
document demonstrating the resolution of the appeal. The department has the option to settle any pending appeals and resubmitted
claims.
(e) A person who acquires ownership or operation of an underground petroleum storage tank under IC 13-23-8-4.5(2) may
become eligible for reimbursement from the fund by complying with subsection (f).
(f) A person described under subsection (e) may become eligible for reimbursement from the fund for any releases reported
after the date that the department receives the “Intent to Acquire UST and Reinstate Eligibility” form by doing the following:
(1) Submitting a fund “Intent to Acquire UST and Reinstate Eligibility” form (Form) as prescribed by the commissioner at
least sixty (60) days prior to acquiring ownership or operation of an underground petroleum storage tank. This form will be
kept confidential up to the earlier ofthe following:
(A) The date of the transfer of the property.
(B) The department’s receipt of the monies provided in subsection (g).
(C) For up to ninety (90) days after the projected date of closure listed in the Form.
The department will provide a listing of environmental penalties, interest due to the fund, and fees due, to the prospective
purchaser and the property owner within forty-five (45) days ofreceipt of the Form.
(2) Paying all applicable tank fees, including past duefees, interest, and penalties for each tank not more than thirty (30)days
after the transaction whereby the person acquires ownership or operation of each tank.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 5
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM TIlE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
(3) The seller of the underground petroleum storage tank site is liable for any and all unpaid tank fees, interest,and penalties
that are assessed by the department in accordance with subsection (g). The purchaser is to collect all past due tank fees,
interest, and penalties from the noncompliant seller and remit to the department the full amount of the assessment for the
subject underground petroleum storage tank provided by the department in accordance with subsection (g) prior to an
occurrence. The timely remittance of these monies is a condition of fund eligibilityfor the purchaser.
(g) Persons listed in section of this rule and described in subsection (e) who fail to pay tank fees when due are subject to
payment of interest and penalties on those fees in order to become eligible for the fund under subsection (f). Interest and penalties
duewill include the following:
(1) Penalties and interest due the department of revenue.
(2) All past due underground storage tank fees under IC 13-23-12.
(3) An environmental penalty as specified in subsection (h)(2). This penalty will be distributed into the fund and into the
Petroleum Trust Fund in accordance with IC 13-23-12-7(b).
(4) Interest will be charged for the missed fee(s) at the percent per year based on subsection (ii) and IC 6-8,1-10-I until all
fees due have been paid in full for each tank. This interest will be deposited into the fund.
Payment ofall fees, interest, and penalties due within thirty (30) days of the date oftransfer of the subject property is a requirement
for fund eligibility for the purchaser.
(h) In addition to all past due fees owed, the amount of interest and penalties owed by a particular owner or operator is to be
determined by the following formula:
(1) Interest as follows:
Number of Delinquent Days
c
Daily Interest Rate InterestDue
Interest will be calculated according to IC 6-8.1-10-1.
(2) Penalty as follows:
(A) For sites that were never registered, or sites for which no tank fees were paid when due, the penalty will be
calculated at two thousand dollars ($2,000) under IC 13-23-12-7(a) per petroleum underground storage tank.
(3) For all other sites, the penalty will be calculated at one thousand dollars ($1,000) per petroleum underground
storage tank for each year that passes after the fee becomes due and before the fee is paid.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 IAC l-3-3;filed Dec 4, 1992, 11:00
am.:
16 JR 1053;Juled Jon 9,
1997, 4:00 p.m.: 20 JR 1104; errata! 20 JR 1593; readoptedjIledJan /0, 2001, 3:2 p.m.: 24 JR /534; filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30
p. tn.: 25 JR 790; erratafiled Feb 27, 2002, 9:58 am..’ 25 JR 2254)
328 IAC 1-3-4
Amount of coverage
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 4. (a) After payment ofthe applicable deductible amount, the fund may pay for costs incurred by persons listed in section
I of this rule, for corrective action and third party liability as specified in IC 13-23-8-I.
(b) Regardless of the number ofeligible persons listed in section I ofthis rule at one(I) site, no more than two million dollars
(52,000,000) may be reimbursed for the costs, including third party liability claims, associated with a single occurrence.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC 1-3-4;filedDcc 4, 1992, 11:00a.m.: I6JR 1054; readoptedfi!ed
Jan 10, 200/, 3:2/p.m.: 21 JR /534; filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 792)
328 IAC 1-3-5
Reimbursable expenditures
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-3-2
Sec.
5.
(a) Persons listed in section I of this rule may seek payment from the fund for the following costs related to necessary
costs actually incurred in the performance ofcorrective action:
(I) Investigation, which includes research, field time, report writing, and clerical support.
(2) Lodging and per diem costs will be paid in accordance with the most current Indiana department of administration
Indiana Administrative Code
.
Page 6
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
financial management circular covering state travel policies and procedures. Mileage shall be calculated at the federal rate
for a privately owned automobile under 4! CFR 301-10.303, in effect on September 6, 2000. Sales ofthe Code ofFederal
Regulations are handled by the Superintendent ofDocuments, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
(3) Persons listed in section 1 ofthis rule may employ a certified contractor under IC 13-23-3-2 or may use the owner’s or
operator’s personnel to perform all or part of a corrective action.
(4) Soil and water sampling forpetroleum and petroleum constituents shall be performed in accordance with rules ofthe solid
waste management board at 329 1AC 9 or the risk integrated system of closure (RISC) standards.
(5) Expenditures for machinery and equipment must be prorated based on the normal expected life ofthe item and the length
of time the item was used for a single corrective action. In no event will the fund pay for purchases of machinery and
equipment in excess ofthe market cost of leasingthe item for a correctiveaction. Examples of equipment charges which can
be made to the fund are disposable bailers and sample bottles.
(6) Persons listed in section 1 of this rule may be reimbursed for expenditures for materials and supplies, such as disposable
protectiveequipment, building materials (piping, cement), and preservatives.
(7) Attorney fees, not to exceed twenty-five percent (25) ofthe total claim or thirty thousand dollars ($30,000), whichever
is less, shall only be payable if incurred by the owner or operator in defense of a third party liability claim.
(8) Governmental administrative fees for local, state, or federal permits necessary for corrective action.
(9) Provision of alternate water supply. This cost must have been previously approved by the department.
(10) Any other reasonable costs the department finds to be necessaryfor correctiveaction or payment of a third party liability
claim.
(II) Costs associated with transitioning a site to RISC will be paid ifthese costs would be less than the costs to complete the
remediation under rules of the solid waste management board at 329 LAC 9.
(12) Markup ofno more than fifteen percent (15) will be reimbursed on all eligible costs except for the following:
(A) Travel costs, including mileage, per diem, and lodging.
(B)
Personnel costs.
(C) Utilities for temporary facilities.
(D) Governmental administrative fees for local, state, or federal permits.
(E) Equipment and supplies not purchased or rentedspecifically for use at a facility or that are not part ofthe approved
remedial technology.
(hI The following expenditures are ineligible for reimbursement from the fund:
(I) Costs incurred before April 1, 1988.
(2) Costs of repair, upgrading, or replacement of an underground petroleum storage tank or its associated equipment.
(3) Costs of environmental investigation and remediation not directly related to a release from a quali~’ingunderground
storage tnnk. Ineligible costs includethe cost oftesting for nonpetrolcum contamination and the cost ofvapor or ground water
monitoring devices that are not associated with corrective action.
(4) The cost of equipment purchases other than those expenditures routinely required to implement a corrective action plan.
Examples of equipment purchases that cannot be charged to a specific site include drilling rigs, earth moving equipment,
photoionization detectors, explosimeters, and hand tools,
(5)
The cost ofcosmetic improvements, incLudingthe repair or replacement of blacktop or concrete, unless directly associated
with corrective action.
(6) Lost income or reduced property values, unless part of a third party liability claim.
(7) Interest or finance charges.
(8) Contractor costs not directly related to corrective action activities, such as preparing cost estimates.
(9) Fines or penalties imposed by local, state, or federal governmental agencies.
(10) Punitive or exemplary damages.
(II) Any costs for remediation of contamination not shown to be abovethe concentrations listed in the Indiana Department
of Environmental Management Underground Storage Tank Guidance Manual (1994), rules of the solid waste management
board at 329 IAC 9, and the RISC standards.
(12) Any costs related to the excavation and disposal of more than one thousand five hundred
(1,500)
tons of soil. unless:
(A) alternative remediation techniques have been considered;
Indiana Administrative Code
.
Page 7
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
(B) excavation and disposal was shown to be the most cost effective remediation option; and
(C) the soil removal is part ofa CAP approved or deemed approved by the commissioner.
(13) Any other cost not directly related to corrective action or third party liability or otherwise determined not to be
reimbursable under this rule as a result of a financial or technical review.
(c) Appropriate expenditures which may be considered for reimbursement are set forth in the following reimbursable
expenditure chart. Sampling and analysis must be conducted in accordance with “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods”, United States Environmental Protection Agency Publication SW-846, Third Edition (November 1986)
as amended by Updates I (July1992), II (September1994), HA (August 1993), 118 (January
1995),
III (December 1996), and lIlA
(May 1999). Publication SW 846 is available from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington,
D.C. 20402.
Activity
Cost Range or Maximum Amount
SITE INVESTIGATION
Mobilization and demobilization within a 50 mile radius. This
includes the cost of moving general contractor owned equipment,
set-up, and removing equipment.
$300
Soil borings
Number of feet in incremental amounts
Less than ¶6 feet
$20 per foot
16 through less than 26 feet
$25 per foot
26 feet or more
$30 per foot
Decontamination and equipment cleaning
$10 per each
5
feet of boring
Cutting holes in concrete or asphalt (12 inches in diameter)
$90 per hole
Materials
Well casing and screen (including riser) filter pack, annular and
surface seal:
2 inch well
$10 per foot
4 inch well
$12 per foot
6 inch well
$15 per foot
Flush-gradewell covers
$75 per cover
Laboratory services, including containers, packaging, and postage.
Soil analysis methods
TPH—80 IS
$75
per sample
TPH—4 18.1
$100 per sample
VOC—8260
$200 per sample
SVOC-~8270
$325 per sample
PAH—83l0
$185 per sample
PCB—8080
$110 per sample
Metals—( 13)
$170 per sample
BTEXJMTBE—8021
$75 per sample
BTEX/MTBE—8260
$200 per sample
Water analysis methods
TPI-F--8015
$75
per sample
VOC—8260
$200 per sample
BTEX/MTBE—8021
$75 per sample
BTEX/MTBE—8260
$200 per sample
Indiana Administrative Code
PageS
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIADILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
SVOC—8270
$325 per sample
PAH—83 10
$185 per sample
Metals—( 13)
$170 per sample
Monitored natural attenuation parameters
Nitrates
$15 per sample
Nitrites
$15 per sample
Sulfate
$15 per sample
Dissolved methane
$50 per sample
Use of RISC will require DQO.-.Level IV, including raw data,
internal chain of custody, and QA/QC.
20 markup allowed per sample
When submitting a claim for reimbursement, the claimant shall be
required to give the personnel classification, task being performed,
and the name of the individual performing the task. Rates will be
paid based on the task performed by an employee rather than the
qualifications of the employee. Refer to subsection (d) for task
descriptions for personnel classifications.
Principal
$110 per hour
Senior project manager
$102 per hour
Project manager
$83 per hour
Staff project person
$70 per hour
Senior technician
$55 per hour
Technician
$38 per hour
Drafting person
$35 per hour
Word processor/clerical
$28 per hour
Toxicologist
$125
per hour
INITIAL ABATEMENT AND FREE PRODUCT REMOVAL
Except where provided in this rule, approval of costs will be on a
case-by-case basis.
SITE SET-UP PREPARATION
Trailer rental
$300 per month ($10 per day)
Portable toilet
$150 per month ($5 per day)
Utility check, the date and time of the utility check must be
documented.
$400
Utilities for temporary facilities
Temporary power
$500 per month ($16.67 per day)
Temporary water
$150 per month ($5 per day)
Temporary phone
$200 per month ($6.67 per day)
DEMOLITI ON
Concrete and asphalt removal
Saw concrete, prices are per linear foot
4 inch concrete
6 inch concrete
Under 200 feet
$1.60 per foot
$2 per foot
200 through 400 feet
$1.40 per foot
$1.81 per foot
400 through 600 feet
$1.33 per foot
$1.70 per foot
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 9
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
600 through 1,000 feet
$1.20 per foot
$1.66 per foot
Over 1,000 feet
$1.08 per foot
$1.60 per foot
Saw asphalt, pricesare per linear foot
3 inch asphalt
4 inch asphalt
6 inch asphalt
Under 450 feet
$1.75 per foot
$1.90 per foot
$3 per foot
450
through 600 feet
$1.50 per foot
$1.75 per foot
$2.75 per foot
600 through 1,000 feet
$1.35
per foot
$1.50 per foot
$2.25 per foot
Over 1,000 feet
$1.25 per foot
$1.35 per foot
$2 per foot
Concrete removal, including the cost of loading and hauling to a
legal landfill within 6 miles, but does not include landfill fees
4
inch concrete
$3 per ton
6
inch concrete
$5.77
per ton
7 inch through 9 inch concrete
$17.47 per ton
10 inch and over
$43.96 per ton
With rebar
Add 15
For less than 500 square feet
Add 35
Concrete curb
$5.04 per linear foot
Asphalt removal, including the cost of loading and hauling to a
legal landfill within ? miles, but does not include landfill fees
Removal asphalt pad (3 inches)
$0.25 per square foot
Removal asphalt curb
$1.41
per linear foot
For less than 500 square feet
Add 35
EXCAVATION
Equipment costs and labor
$2.22 per ton
Mobilization
$300
Supplies, for example, visqueen.
Stockpiling soil on-site
$1.34 per ton
Tank removal, decommissioning, cutting, and disposal are not
eligible for reimbursement unless necessary as part of corrective
action.
Costs for pumping, testing, and disposal of tank contents are not
eligible for reimbursement
Under 1.000 gallons
$1,000 per tank
1,000 through 4,999 gallons
$1,500 per tank
5.000 through 10,000 gallons
$2,000 per tank
Above 10,000 gallons
$2,500 per tank
TRANSPORTATION
Loading
$1.34 per ton
Hauling, mileage must be documented
$0.37 per ton for each mile
DISPOSAL OF SOIL, GROUND WATER, AND TRASH
Landfill fees
Sampling required by landfill. Must include receipts and
analytical results from local municipality.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 10
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Sanitary sewer, if approved for disposal of treated ground
water. Must include receipts.
Contaminated or disposable equipment
and
decontamination fluids.
Landfill reimbursement will be based on the least expensive
combination ofdocumented transportation costs and documented
disposal costs at a permitted landfill.
Trash
$15 perton
APPROVED TECHNOLOGIES
Reimbursement for corrective action costs will be reimbursed on
the basis of the lowest of three (3) competitive bids on the work
specified in the correctiveaction plan that is approved or deemed
approved by the department. Ifthe claimant can provide sufficient
technical justification for the selection of another bid, the
corrective action costs associated with the higher bid will be
reimbursed.
Lease or rental on equipment wilt not be reimbursed above the
purchase price.
SITE RESTORATION
Backfill hauling
$0.37 per ton for each mile
Backfill material
$13 per ton/stone
$6.50 per ton/soil
Backfill placement, compaction, and density verification
$4 per ton
Resurfacing
4 inch concrete
$3.25 per square foot
For each additional inch of concrete
Add $0.40 per square foot
For rebar
Add 15
Asphalt pad, 4 inch thickness
$2.15 per square foot
Asphalt curb and gutter
$4.75 per linear foot
Island forms
4 feet by 10 feet with 2 foot bumpers
$725 each
4 feet by 16 fret with 2 foot bumpers
$1,100 each
Equipment rental (based on daily rate; not an inclusive list)
Decontamination equipment (bucket, brushes, detergent)
$10
Power auger
$50
Hand auger sampling kit (hand auger/ brass sleeves)
$35
Slide hammer core sampler
$35
Photoionization detector
$75
Flame ionization detector
$95
LEL/02 meter
$50
ph and conductivity meter
$20
Dissolved oxygen meter
$30
2” submersible pump
$115
4” submersible pump
$95
Indiana Administrative Code
Page II
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Direct push technology
$1,200 per day
$750 per
V2
day
Steam cleaner/pressure washer
$75
Water level indicator
.
$12
Oil/water interface probe
$55
Bailerrental
$15
Anemometer
$35
Carbon dioxide meter
$25
Portable generator, generator
?
5kW
$50
Portable generator, generator 5kW
$90
Portable generator, generator
?
10kW
$100
Portable generator, generator I0kW
$125
(d) The following categories describe the personnel classification activity descriptions:
(I) Principal wilt do the following:
(A) Supervise professional staff.
(B) Serve as technical experton sites.
(C) Provide final review of project documents.
(D) Limit site visits on projects.
(E) Handle legal matters.
(F) Coordinate with attorneys.
(2) Senior project manager (includes professional geologist, engineer, and hydrogeologist) will provide the following:
(A) Project management/oversight.
(B) Technical document preparation/review.
(C) Coordination with the department, client, and contractors.
(D) 1-lydrogeologic ahd contaminant modeling.
(E) Supervision of investigation/remediatiun activities.
(F) Site access/permitting.
(3) Project manager will provide the following:
(A) Remediation work plan preparation (CAP, ISC, FSI, pilot study).
(B) Site work preparation and planning.
(C) Supervision of remediation activities.
(D) Oversight of waste characterization, transportation, and disposal.
(E) RISC statistics and equations.
(F) Coordination of subcontractor work (drillers, plumbers, and electricians).
(C) Coordination of heavy equipment mobilization.
(4) Staff project person will do the following:
(A) Implement remediation system installation,operation, and maintenance.
(B) Conduct site mapping.
(C) Assist with waste characterization, transportation, and disposal.
(ID) Oversee installation of soil borings and monitoring wells.
(E) Provide on-site supervision and/or perform site characterization and remediation activities.
(F) Oversee well water records searches.
(C)
Define how site utilities are marked.
(H) Survey wells.
(I) Oversee free product removal.
(J) Conduct quarterly sampling.
(K) Provide drilling/sampling support.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 12
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
(5) Senior technician will oversee the following:
(A) Activities associated with operationand maintenance of remediation system.
(B) Equipment installation.
(6) Field technician will oversee the following:
(A) Well purging and development.
(B) Sample collection.
(C) Drum labeling/disposal.
(D) Decontamination/site clean-up tasks.
(B) Sample preparation and delivery.
(7) Drafting person will do the following:
(A) Provide CADD work.
(B) Generate drawings, maps and plans, boring logs, and monitoring well installation logs.
(C) Revise drawings and maps and plans.
(8) Word processor/clerical will provide the following:
(A) Word processing/data input.
(B) General clerical duties.
(C) Documentation reproduction, report binding, and filing.
(D) Proofreading/editing.
(9) Toxicologist will provide guidance for nondefault risk-based closures utilizing nondefault toxicological parameters.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328/AC 1-3-5
.
fl/ed Dec 4, 1992, 11:00a.m.: 16 JR 1054; filed Nov I,
/995, 8:30a.m.: 19JR343;flled.Jan 9, /997, 4:00 p.m.: 201R 1105; readopledflled,Jan 10, 2001, 3:21 p.m.: 241R 1534;fIled
Oct /7. 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 IR 792; erratafiled Feb 27, 2002, 9:58a.m.: 25 JR 2255)
328 IAC 1-3-6
Limitation of
liability
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. 6. The application for or receipt ofpayment for correctiveaction does not limit the legal responsibility of persons listed
in section I of this rule for damages incurred by another person as a result of a release.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial
Assurance Board; 328 JAC 1-3-6;jiledDec 4, 3992, 11:00am.: 16 JR 1055; readoptedfiledianl0, 2001, 3:23p.m.: 24 JR 1534;
filed Ocil?, 200). 4:30 p.m.: 25 JR 798)
Rule 4.
Prioritization
of Claims
328 IAC 1-4-I
General procedure
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. I. (a) The procedure set forth in this rule shall be followed in the event the unencumbered balance of funds in the fund
falls belowtwenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000) or by the discretion ofthe administrator.
(b) Each qualifying claim shall be assigned a priority score based on a ranking system designed to address the following:
(I) Initial prioritization ofall claims shall be based on the degree ofenvironmental threat existing at the time the occurrence
was discovered. The administrator shall assign a priority score upon evaluation of the following technical criteria (listed in
descending order, from highest priority to lowest priority, clause (A) having the highest priority):
(A) Impacts to public and private water supply.
(B) Type of petroleum.
(C) Health standards and explosivity hazard.
(B) Corrective action taken.
(B) Number of gallons released.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 13
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
(F) Degree of access to contaminated soil.
(G) Designated use of surface water.
(H) Site geology and hydrology.
(2) For purposes of scoring claims resulting from occurrences before December 4, 1992, and after March 31, 1988, the
administrator shall give additional consideration for when the corrective action was taken.
(3) Scoring of claims shall be determined by application of the following site assessment model:
Site Assessment Scoring Model for Prioritization of Claims
Criteria
Value
Site assessment information.
Public drinking water supply or well within I mile:
Is contamination present in drinking water?
YES
15
NO
Number of wells within I mile
II
2 through 3
2
4 through 6
3
óormore
4
Public water total
times 24 equals_____
Private drinking water supply or well within I mile:
Is contamination present in drinking water?
YES
IS
NO
0
Number of wells within I mile
I through 10
II through 25
2
26 through 100
3
greater than 100
4
Private drinking water total
times 12 equals
Type of petroleum
Mixed products or waste oil
is
Leaded gasoline
Gasoline
12
Jet
fuels
10
Diesel fuels
Heating fuels
8
KeTosene fuels
7
Crude oil
Other
Type of petroleum total
_____
times 10 equals
—
Health standards and explosivity hazards
Contamination phase
Vapors present at the time release discovered
10
Free product present at the time the release was discovered
7
Surface contamination present at the time the release was discovered
5
Structures affected
Residential housing
Municipal, commercial, or industrial
5
Utility lines or trenches
Area designation
Large municipality or urban area
7
IndianaAdministrative Code
Page 14
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Small municipality or suburban area
5
Rural, agricultural, or livestock area
I
Health standards total
times 6 equals
______
Corrective action taken
Corrective action complete
5
Corrective action over
50
complete
5
Corrective action initiated
S
Corrective action approved by the department
S
Site characterization complete
5
Release response measures complete
5
Corrective action total
times 4 equals
_____
Number of gallons released
Over 12,000
10
5,000 through 11,999
8
2,000 through 4,999
6
500 through 1,999
4
100 through 500
2
Under 100
1
Number of gallons released total
times S equals
______
Degree of access to contaminated soil
Contamination access
Surface (0 to 2 feet below surface)
10
Subsurface (over 2 feet below surface)
5
Access total
______
times 4 equals
______
Designated use of surface water
Surface waters within
‘/3
mile
Lake or river
3
Swamp or wetlands
3
Pond or canal
2
Stream, creek, or active drainage ditch
I
Distance to surface waters
Under 500 feet
3
500 feet to ¼mile
2
Over ¼mile
Designated use of surface water
Drinking water
4
Recreational or full body human contact
3
Aquatic, wildlife, or partial human contact
3
Agriculture or livestock
2
Designated use of surface water total
times 4 equals
_______
Site geology and hydrogeology
Soil type
Sand
4
Clay
I
Depth to water table in feet
0 through 10
4
11 through 20
3
21 through 40
2
Over 40
I
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 15
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Unusual geologic factors, for example, fractured bedrock, sand or gravel veins,
perched aquifers, or geological outcroppings
YES
S
NO
0
Site geology and hydrogeology total
times
3
equals
_______
(c) To assure the efficient administration ofthe fund, the administrator may reclassify a claim at any time that it is determined
a claim has been incorrectly ranked.
(d) Placement of a claim on a priority list does not constitute a commitment to reimburse corrective action or third party
liability costs.
(Underground
St
orageTank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC J-4-J:f,Ied Dec 4, 1992, 11:00 am.: 16 JR 1055;
filed Nov 1, 1995, 8:30am.: 19 JR 347;
readoptedfiledJan
10, 2001, 3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534; filed Oct 1?, 2001, 4:30p. m.: 25 JR
799)
328
IAC 1-4-2
Creation of the initial priority list (Repealed)
Sec. 2.
(Repealed by
Underground Storage Tank Financial Assurance Board;filed
Nov 1,
1995, 8:30 api.: 19 JR 350)
328
I/SC
1-4-3
Creation of subsequent priority lists
Authority: IC 13-14-8
Affected:
IC 13-23-9-2; IC 13-23-9-4
Sec. 3. (a) Except for environmental emergencies, initial claims shall be ranked according to those conditions which existed
at the time the correctiveaction was commenced. Claims determined to be ofidentical priority shall be ranked according to the date
that an acceptable claim was received by the fund.
(b) Subsequent claims may be reprioritized based on the environmental threat present during the time period for which
additional reimbursement is being claimed.
(c) The administrator shall notify claimants within sixty (60) days after the receipt of their claims whether their claims shall
be approved for payment. If a claim is determined to be unacceptable or ineligible after reviewing the submitted information in
accordance with IC 13-23-9-2, the administrator shall notify the owneror operator within ten (10)days of the denial and inform the
claimant of the reasons for which the claim was rejected.
(d) Claims determined to be unacceptable may be revised and resubmitted to the fund. The priority ranking process of the
revised claim shall be based on the date that the fund receives the revised claim.
(e) A claimant may request a review of a denial of payment using the procedures set forth in IC 13-23-9-4.
(Underground
Storage
Tank Financial.lssurance Board, 328/AC
l-4-3;filedDec 4, 1992, 11:00a.m.: 161R
1055;JiledMay25, J999, 4:31p.m.:
22 JR 3103:
readopiedfiled Jan 10, 200!, 3:21 p.m.: 24 JR 1534)
Rule S.
Corrective Action Claims
328
IAC
1-5-I
Applications
for payment of
corrective action
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23
Sec. I. (a) Claim applications for reimbursement of corrective action costs shall be submitted on forms adopted by the
administrator. Claimants shall itemize all charges as required by the application package. Documentation of expenses as required
by the administrator must be submitted as part of the application.
(b) The application shall contain the following statement, which shall be signed and attested by the person applying to the
fund:
“I swear or affirmto the best ofmy knowledge and belief that the costs presented herein represent the actual costs incurred
in the performance of corrective action related to this site during the period of time indicated on this application. I also swear
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 16
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
or affirmthat all charges presented as part of this application were necessaiy to the performance of corrective action.”,
(c) Two (2) copies of all documents required by the administrator shall be submitted by the person applying to the fUnd to
support the application. Original documents must be kept by the person applying to the fund for a minimum of four (4) years after
the date the application for payment was submitted, or four (4) years after completion of corrective action, whichever is later.
(d) A single claim application may not be submitted to the fund for reimbursement in an amount less than the following:
(I) Initial claim may be submitted for any amount, including $0/eligibility preapproval claims.
(2) Subsequent claims, five thousand dollars ($5,000) unless the claim is:
(A) the final application for that incident;
(B) for a third party liability claim; or
(C) for costs incurred over a period of four (4) months or longer.
(3) Persons applying to the fund may resubmit claims in any amount if the costs were disallowed for lack of backup
documentation.
Persons applying to the fund shall identify the final application as such.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board;
328 J,4C 1-5-/cf/ed
Dec 4,
199Z
11:00a.m.: 161R 1056;fz/ed Nov 1, 1995, 8:30a.m.: 19 JR 349; readoptedf/ed Jan 10,2001,
3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;f/ed Oct 17.
200), 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 801)
328 I/SC 1-5-2
Fund payment procedures for corrective action
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-9-2
Sec. 2. (a) Contingent on the availability ofmonies as determined by 328 LAC 1-2-3, the administrator shall authorize payment
upon determining that the requirements of IC 13-23-9-2 have been met.
(b) Processing and payment of claims are contingent upon the availability of monies.
(c) When a person applying to the fund submits an application under section I ofthis rule, which includes expenses for which
that person has not made payment, then payment shall be made by checkjointly to the person applying to the fund and the contractor
involved.
(d) When a person applying to the fund submits documentation verifying that that
sic.
person has paid for costs ofcorrective
action, payment shall be made by check directly to that person.
(e) A person who may apply to the fund under 328 IAC 1-3-1 may seek preapproval of a site’s eligibilityto have corrective
action costs reimbursed from the fund.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financia/Assurance Board; 3281AC )-5-2;fi/edDec 4, 1992,
11:00a.m.: 16 JR 1056;f/edMay 25, 1999, 4:31p.m.: 22 JR 3103; readoptedf/ed Jan 10, 2001, 3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;Juled Oct
17, 200/. 4:30p.m.: 25 IR 80/)
328 I/SC 1-5-3
Deemed approved; reimbursement of costs
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-8-4
Sec. 3. “Deemed approved”, under IC 13-23-8-4, means that the department shall consider the CAP approved solely for
purposes of reimbursement of reasonable costs from the fund, A CAP having been deemed approved shall in no way relieve The
person applying to the fund ofthe obligation to comply with all applicable rules or department standards.
(Underground
Storage
Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 IAC 1-5-3;fled Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 802)
Rule 6.
Third
Party Liability Claims
328 JAC 1-6-1
Applications for payment of
third
party
liability claims
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-8-3
Sec. I. (a) Applications for reimbursement ofthird party liability claims against owners or operators shalt be submitted on
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 17
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
approved forms established by the department. The claimant must attach either a certified copy of a legally enforceable final
judgment against the owner or operator or a reasonable settlement between the owner or operator and the third party.
(b) The owneror operator must submit proofof payment of the deductible amount under IC 13-23-8-1
(c) When submitting an application to the administrator under subsection (a). the owneror operator must also forward a copy
of the request to the attorney general.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financia/Assurance Board; 328 JAC I-6-J;fl/ed Dec 4, 1992,
11:00a.m.: 161R 1057; readopiedfiledfan 10, 2001, 3:21 p.m.: 24 JR 1534; fIledOct17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 802)
328 I/SC 1-6-2
Fund payment procedures for third party liability
Authority: IC 13-23-8-1; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC 13-23-9-3
Sec. 2. (a) If the attorney general determines that the requirements under IC 13-23-9-3 have been met, the attorney general
shall approve a request for indemnification of a third party not later than sixty (60) days after receiving the request:
(I) if sufficient monies exist after other obligations have been met under 328 IAC 1-2-3;
(2) based upon priority ranking of the site under 328 IAC 1-4 if applicable; and
(3) if the administrator determines that the owner or operator is in compliance with the requirements of IC 13-23 and rules
adopted thereunder.
(b) When an owner or operator submits an acceptable application for indemnification of a third party but the claim has not
already been paid by the owner or operator, then payment shall be madejointly by check to the eligible owneror operator and the
third party.
(c) When an eligible owner or operator submits an acceptable application for indemnification of a third party along with
documentation verifying that the owner or operator has paid the third party liability claim, payment shall be made directly to the
eligible owner or operator.
(d) Third party liabilityclaims subjectto review by the attorney general shall include the reasonable fees orcompensationpaid
to obtain:
(I) access to properties not controlled by the claimant;
(2) institutionalcontrols, including, but not limited to, deed restrictions required by risk integrated system of closure(RISC);
or
(3) subdivisions (I) and (2).
(Underground
Storage Tank Financia/Assurance Board; 328 JACJ-6-2;fledDec 4. 199Z 11:00am.:161R 1057; readoptedfiled
Jan 10. 2001. 3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;filed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 802)
Rule 7.
Financial Assurance
328 I/SC 1-7-1
Financial assurance certificate
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-11-7
Affected: IC 13-23
Sec. 1. (a) In accordance with 40 CFR 280.101
•
the department shall issue a certificate of financial assurance upon request
to each eligible tank owneror operator, as defined in 328 IAC 1-3-3, within sixty (60)days afterthe effectivedate ofthis rule. Under
IC 13-23 and The rules promulgated thereunder, this state issued certificateshall fulfill The federal financial assurancerequirements.
(b) The certificate offinancial assurance shall contain the following information:
(1) Facility name and address.
(2) Facility identification number issued by the department.
(3) Amount of funds for correctiveaction and compensating third parties that is assured by the fund.
(c) The owner or operator shall maintain the certificate of financial assurance in compliance with rules of the solid waste
management board at 329 IAC 9-8-21.
(UndergroundS:orage Tank FlnancialAssuranceBoard; 328 JAC 1-7-1 ;ftledDec 4, 1992,
11:00 am.: 16 JR 1055; readoptedfiledJan 10, 2001, 3:21 p.m.: 24 JR 1534;ftled Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR
802)
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 18
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
328 I/SC 1-7-2
TerminatioN of financial assuraNce by the department
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC 13-23-8-4.5; IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected: IC 13-23
Sec. 2. If, after consultation with the financial assurance board, the department determines that insufficient monies exist to
provide owners oroperators evidence of financial assurance, the department shall noti& all fund participants by certified mail. The
fund coverage will continue for sixty (60) days after notice oftermination of coverage. Owners or operators shall have sixty (60)
days after receipt of termination of financial assurance to acquire financial assurance by other means.
(UndergroundStorage Tan/c
Financia/ Assurance Board; 328 JAC 1-7-2;fla’ed Dec 4, 199Z 11:00am.: 16 JR 1057; readoptedflled Jan 10, 2001, 3:21p.m.:
24 JR I 534;Ju/ed Oct / ~ 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 803)
328 I/SC 1-7-3
Revocation of certificate by the department
Authority: IC 13-23-8-I; IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC 13-23-8-5; IC 13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
3.
Ifthe department determines that the owner or operator has not maintained eligibility for participation in the fund, the
certificateof financial assurance issued by the department shall be revoked. The owneror operator shall have fifteen (15) days after
revocation ofa certificateto reinstate eligibility.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC 1- 7-3;/I/edDec
4, 1992, 11:00 am.: 16 JR 1057; readoptedfl/ed Jan 10. 2001. 3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;Jl/ed Oct 17, 2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 803)
*
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 19
ATTACHMENT
5
iwaximuni Kesunaule
Losts
-
Direct PusH
I
eciulolog)
‘age
1
01
A
-
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Direct Push Technology
Storage Tank Fund
Article 4, Part 1
4-I-I. MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM REIMBURSEMENT PER DAY
Minimum reimbursement: $766/day, plus mileage ~ 98.50/mile
Maximum reimbursement: The greater of$766/day or $9/foot, not to exceed $ 1,422/day, plus mileage
@
98.50/mile
These rates include mobilization, demobilization, rig up, rig down, decontamination, and all non-consultant labor.
4-1-2. INSTALL TEMPORARY WELL IN DIRECT PUSH BORING
$22.00/well (includes all materials)
4-1-3. INSTALL PERMANENT WELL IN DIRECT PUSH BORING
$8.00/ft. The $8/ft rate includes all materials except locks and permits. Locks and permits should be billed separately at cost
plus applicable markup.
Permanent well means: 1” inside diameter casing, capable of accepting 3/4” diameter bailer, pre-slotted screen, adequate
filter pack, bentonite seal, locking cap, street box with traffic-rated cover.
4-1-4. WELL ABANDONMENT (closure)
$44.00/well (includes materials and labor)
4-1-49. CONSULTANT
LABOR AND FIELD INSTRUMENTATION
Consultant on-site labor allowable for the duration of the direct push boring time, plus two hours.Field instruments such as
PlOs (photo-ionization detectors) may be billed separately.
4-I-SO. MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22/day/site. This includes such items as gloves, baggies, ice, water, rope, pens, etc. No receipts are required.
_
State Home! CDLE Home Oil & Public Safety Top
I
Feedback Page 1
Last modified: November 16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OJL/FundJconsultantlcost2ogujdeljnes/drctpush.asp
10/13/2003
MUXIZUW11 Kes0n44We Lusts
-
DrillIng
1U~UA 01
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Storage Tank
Fund
Maximum Reasonable
Costs
-
Drilling
Article 4, Part 2
4-2-I. RATES PER FOOT. The following per-foot costs include all materials, equipment, and non-consultant labor
necessary to drill a boring for either a 2” or 4” diameter well. The rates shown for rotary drilling apply to either air or fluid
rotary drilling. The costs include decontamination, collecting split spoon samples in liners at 5’ intervals, and backfihling
borings with bentonite grout. The costs do not include miscellaneous small items (see Miscellaneous Field Supplies).
Drillin g for a
2”
moultoring well
IL
JL
Drill
lug
for a 4” moultoring well
j
Auger
f~
0-50’
J
$16.41/ft
II
j
Auger
0-50’
j~
$19.15/ft
Auger
j~
50’
II
$18.41/ft
I’_________
Auger
50’
j~
$21.33/ft
j
f
~
Rotary
Rotary
II
II
0- 50’
50’
$21.06/ft
J
Rotary
0-50’
~f
$27.35/ft
II
$23.52/ft
Jj
Rotary
50’
If
$30.09/ft
4-2-2.
MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION
$3.03/mile
4-2-3.
SOIL SAMPLING (split spoon)
$17.1 0/sample. This includes decontamination, labor, materials, and equipment. This cost is reimbursable only when samples
are necessary more frequently than the
5’
intervals included in the per-foot drilling rate. Examples of when more frequent
samples may be necessary, such as when drilling the first boring and trying to locate the contamination zone or the water
level, or when there is a high fluctuation in groundwater level. No additional consultant fees will be reimbursed. Unless OIS
requires or pre-approves a soil sampling method other than split spoon, the Fund will not reimburse additional costs for a
more expensive soil sampling method.
4-2-4. COMPLETION OF BOREHOLE AS MONITORING WELL
2’ well: $15. 14/fl
4” well: $21.67/ft
These rates include all associated labor and materials
4-2-5.
WELL ABANDONMENT (closure)
2” well: $7.47/fl
4” well: $11.08/ft
These rates include all associated labor and materials.
4-2-48. MARKUP
No markup is permitted if the consultant does his own drilling, using his own equipment and labor.
4-2-49. CONSULTANT LABOR AND FIELD INSTRUMENTATION Consultant on-site labor allowable for the
duration of the drilling time, plus two hours. Field instruments such as PIDs (photo-ionization detectors) may be billed
separately.
—
4-2-50. MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22/day/site. This includes such items as gloves, baggies, ice, water, rope, pens, etc. No teceipts are required.
http://oil.cdle.staie.co.
us/OIL/Fundlconsultantlcost2oguidelines/drilling.asp
10/13/2003
LUbt
¼JUi¼hCLisiCb
-
L.g~.S.,aLlUL& allis
U&~~Us~Ss
A s5~i- A Us —
-
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
MaximumReasonable Costs
-
Excavation & DIsposal
Storage Tank Fund
Article 4, Part 3
4-3-I. RATES FOR ACTIVITIESASSOCIATED WITH THE EXCAVATION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL
OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS.
ACTIVITY
MAXIMUM RATE
Excavation and loading
$10.67/coyd
Transportation of contaminated so11
$8.75/cu yd
Disposal ofcontaminated soil
$13.13/cu yd
Backfill and compaction (purchase, transport, compact backfill material)
$7.66/cu yd
Backlill and compaction (clean excavated material)
$5.07/cu yd
Remove and dispose of asphalt or concrete
$2.19/sq ft
Replace asphalt
$2.74/sq ft
Replace concrete
$4.92/sq ft
traffic control
actuat cost
Permits
actuaL cost
4-3-2.
MILEAGE.
I l&mile!cuhic ~ard for each mile over 40 miles from excavation site to disposal site, not to exceed 200 miles total one-way.
4-3-3.
LABORATORY ANALYSIS.
Laboratory analysis is recommended for each 100 cubic yards excavated to confirm the level of contamination.
4-3-4. MANIFESTS.
All transportation and waste manifests are required
4-3-5. CONVERSION FACTOR.
Ifany excavation, transportation or disposal activities are billed by the ton instead of cubic yard,
use this conversion factor: 1.4 tons
I cu yd
4-3-6. APPLICANT-PERFORMED.
Fund Applicants who perform their own work are entitled to reimbursement at the maximum rates established at §4-3-I.
4-3-48. MARKUP.
http://oil .cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fundlconsuttantlcost2oguidelines/excvdisp.asp
10/13/2003
LUSt
Luluelilies
-
bxcavauun anu IJAspusui
I age
—
Ui
Consultants may mark up pass-through (subcontracted) charges, subject to any limitations established by these reasonable cost guidelines.
Applicants who perform their own work may not mark up any costs.
4-3-49. CONSULTANT LABOR AND FIELD INSTRUMENTATION.
Consultant on-site labor allowable for the duration ofthe excavation, plus two hours. Field instruments such as PIDs (photo-ionization
detectors) may be billed separately.
4-3-50. MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES. $22/day/site. This includes such items as gloves, baggies, ice, water, rope, pens, etc.
No receipts are required.
State Home
I
Qji4fublicSafe~y
Feedback Page I
Last modified: November 16,2001
http://oil .cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fundlconsultantlcost2oguidelines/excvdjsp.asp
10/13/2003
LuSt UUAUelill’.s
-
Ufoullu
waLer
saiiipiiii~
A
~
A
UI
A
-
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safely
Colorado Petroleum
Storage Tank Fund
Maximum
Reasonable Costs- Groundwater Sampling
Article 4, Part 4
4-4-I. RATE PER WELL SAMPLED
$116.00 per well. This includes all labor and materials (bailer, non-disposable bailer, water-level indicator). It does not
include analytical testing or disposal of purge water. No additional consultant labor will be reimbursed.
4-4-49. CONSULTANT LABOR AND FIELD INSTRUMENTATION
No additional on-site consultant labor will be reimbursed. Field instruments may be billed separately.
4-4-50. MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22/day/site. This includes such items as gloves, baggies, ice, water, rope, pens, etc. No receipts are required.
Statefipnie
I CQLEJ-Ipme
ciL&_P~b1ic~Safety
I
Feedback Page
Last modified: November 16, 2001
http://oil .cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fundlconsultantlcost2oguidelines/gwsmplngasp
10/13/2003
LUUSUItUIlt
S
LUUUI
I\.U~e
~euedute
age
I UI
—
-
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Maximum
Reasonable Costs
-
Labor Rate Schedule
Storage Tank Fund
Consultant’s Labor
Article 4, Part
S-I
4-5-1-I. APPLICATION OF RATES
These rates apply to environmental consultants. Reimbursement will be according to task performed
(see
“Responsibilities
and Duties” on chart below), not job title of person performing it. Listing as an environmental consultant is required for any
labor billed above the staff engineer/scientist rate. Refer to the
Listed Environmental Consultant
portion of the Colorado
Reasonable Cost Guidelines (Article 2) for more information.
4-5-1-2. 100/n LIMITATION
Total hours in top 3 categories (Principal, Senior Engineer/Scientist, and Project Manager) cannot exceed 10 of consultant’s
total project labor hours.
4-5-1-3. COMPLEX SITE
A complex site is one with extensive groundwater and soil contamination, difficult hydrogeology, multiple contaminants, or
above-ground complications.
4-5-1-4. CONSULTANT LABOR RATES
Pursuant to CR5. 12-25-105, some ofthe following responsibilities and duties may require either Jicensure as a professional
engineer or the proper level of supervision from a professional engineer. It is the responsibility of the consultant to comply
with state law on this issue.
POSITION
.
MAXIMUM HOURLY RATE
.
.
RESPONSIBILITIES and DUTIES
Listed
Unlisted
consultant
consultant
PRINCIPAL
$1 IS
$60
.
Review complex sites
Authorize new technology
Project-related budget approval
Corrective action plan review
Project-related contract review and
approval
SENIOR ENGINEER/SCIENTIST
(Involvement limited to projects
requiring highly specialized
training)
$93
.
$60
New technology innovatiohs
Complex site characterizations
Aquifer characterization (complex sites)
Review complex
technical reports
Review complex corrective action plans
PROJECT MANAGER
$88
$60
Project management
Approvehealth and safety plan
Review and approve reports and field data
Review and approve work plan
Approve on-site activities
Perform periodic site inspections
bttp;//oil.cdJe.state.co.us/OIL/Fund/consu1tantJcost2oguide1jnes/labor~pj.~sp
10/13/2003
Lonsultant
S
LuOur Rate ~ejxeuu1e
I
—
Us
—
Prepare proposals
Manage subcontractors
Represent client in dealings with
governmental/regulatory agencies
PROJECT
ENGINEER’SCIENTIST
~
$71
$60
Remediation feasibility studies and pilot
testing
Engineering/remedial equipment design
Aquifer characterization
Prepare final technical reports
Prepare corrective action plans
Data review and analysis
Prepare work plan
Site inspection
STAFF ENGINEER/SCIENTIST
.
$60
$60
Supervise on-site activities
Field work preparation/planning
Oversee outside contractors
Site reconnaissance and mapping
Permitting
On-site assessment activities
Obtain off-site access permission
Prepare draft reports
Health and safety coordination and
monitoring
Develop site safety plan
SENIOR TECHNICIAN
$49
$49
Operate and maintain remedial equipment
Operate field and monitoring equipment
Well developing and sampling
DRAFTS PERSON
$44
$44
Drafting
CAD work
Cartography
STAFF TECHNICIAN
$38
$38
Waste handling
Decontamination
Free product removal
Maintain field monitoring equipment
Assist senior technician
CLERICAL/COURIER
‘~
$33
$33
Project-related word processing
Project-related filing and mailing
Project-related photocopying
Travel to deliver or pick up job-related
samples, supplies, etc.
State Home CDLE Home Qj~4Public~gfe Thp Fe~4~çiç~Pae
I
Last modified: November 16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fund/consultantlcost2Oguidelines/laborcn2.asp
10/13/2003
AIMMAIIUDI At SSUIIkLUIL L.UStb - L400rkALOI’ A11UI)Skb
flL~I. t UL —
-
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Maximum
Reasonable Costs
-
Laboratory Analysis
Tank Fund
Article 4, Part 6
4-6-1. LABORATORY ANALYSIS
The Fund wilt reimburse actual laboratory charges not to exceed the rates shown in the following chart. These rates include
all supplies, sample handling, and disposal fees.
4-6-2. INVOICES
Invoices for laboratory analysis must be provided, regardless of the invoice amount.
4-6-3. RUSH CHARGES
Rush charges up to an additional 100 of a laboratory analysis rate that does not exceed these
Guidelines
will be reimbursed
ifjustified economically by reducing overall remediation costs or if incurred because of emergency health or environmental
issues. “Rush” means performing the analysis by the next laboratory working day.
4-6-4. INDIVIDUAL LAB TEST RATES
LABORATORY TEST
J
METHOD
II
MAXIMUM RATE
1
BTEX
8020
$63.00
TyPE!
8015 MOD
II
$63.00
rTEPH
1
8015 MOD
II
$81.00
TRPU
418.1
1664
I
$60.00
to be determined
MTBE (separate test)
~
8020
$69.00
OIL &
grease
413.1
j
1664
j
$60.00
to be determined
BTEX/TVPH
8020/8015 MOD
$103.00
1
BTEX/MTBE
8020
$77.00
1
BTEX/MTBE/TVPH
8020/8015 MOD
$115.00
PCB screen
8080 MOD
J
$113.00
VOA
J
18260
1
$193.00
Semi-VOA
8270
$382.00
II
http://oil.cdlestate.co.us/OJL/Fund/consultant/cost2ogujdelines/labanal2.asp
10/13/2003
£~kU?~LL1LUtttLtU4~UnuOLcLUSL~- Laour~LUL) M~fl4L~L~
‘
— US —
Total lead
6010
$22.00
~IktI~d
State Home I CDLE Home I Oil &Public Safety
I
Top
I
Feedback Page 1
Last modified: November 16,2001
http://oil.cdle.state.eo.us/OIL/Fundiconsultantlcost2ogujdeljnes/labanal2.asp
10/13/2003
TCLP Pb (includes extraction)
1311/6010
j~
$71.00
TCLP Pb & Cr (includes extraction)
J
1311/6010
$78.00
TCLP VOA
8260
1
$193.00
Zero headspace extraction
J
1311
ii
$137.00
Filtration (liquid)
TCLP (8 RCRA metals)
Extraction (solid)
~j
J
6010/7000 series
131!
J
1
$36.00
$113.00
$104.00
j
Filtration (liquid)
lgnitability/flashpoint
Corrosivity
Paint filter test
Reactivity
-
sulfide
I
f
~
1010
9040/9045
9095
SW 7.3.4.2
I
j
~
$36.00
$37.00
$10.00
$16.00
$39.00
I
I
1
Reactivity
-
cyanide
SW 7.3.3.2
$39.00
WET test (acute test)
2 species run at S dilution concentrations
$821.00
4-6-48. MARKUP
The consultant may
mark up
laboratory
affiliated with the consultant.
rates if the laboratory analysis is performed by a laboratory that is not owned by nor
Lust
UUIUesi!ius
-
LC~e101
1~11urt
S
S US S
‘K
‘
-
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
~j
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Level ofEffort
Storage Tank Fund
•~
Article 4, Part 7
4-7-1. OFFSITE ACCESS
Maximum hours: Actual, not to exceed S hours per project for off-site access of up to three properties. Any additional hours
should be clearly identified.
4-7-2.
WELL
DEVELOPMENT
Maximum hours: Actual, not to exceed 1.5 hours per well. Any additional hours should be clearly identified.
4-7-3. UTILITY LOCATE
Maximum hours:
Actual, not to exceed
8
hours per site. Any additional hours should be clearly identified.
State Home pCDLE Home pOil & Public Safety I Top I Feedback Page
Last modified: November 16, 2001
hup://oil.cdle.state.co.us/oILFundiconsuItanucost2ogujde1jnes/leveff~.~p
10/13/2003
.IUAIAISUI1I Ke8SUL1UOAU
LUSLS
-
Ken
iii V. 1’UrC11aSL~
S
* US
S
-
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
r
Maximum
Reasonable Costs
-
Rental vs. Purchase
Storage Tank Fund
Articie
4, Part8
4-8-I. FUND REIMBURSEMENT
The Fund will reimburse the lower ofthe cost to rent or purchase remediation equipment. In most instances, the burden will
be on the Fund Applicant to prove that purchase was more economically feasible than leasing or renting the equipment, or to
prove that it was not possible to rentllease the equipment, such that purchase was the only option.
4-8-2. COMPARING RENTAL AND PURCHASE COSTS
When determining whether to rent or purchase equipment, all costs should be factored into the decision, including operation
and maintenance costs, If the prime contractor or consultant leases its own equipment to the Applicant, no operation and
maintenance costs will be reimbursed.
Rental rates should factor in the following:
o purchase price of the equipment
+
markup, if applicable
o salvage value of the equipment
o expected economic life of the equipment (assumed to be 30 months unless manufacturer states otherwise)
o cost of capital (interest)
4-8-3. PARTIAL
REIMBURSEMENT
If a Fund Applicant purchases remediation equipment and uses it for only a few months, the Fund may reimburse only a
portion of the purchase price, adjusted to factor in the economic life of the equipment and the number of months the
equipment was used at the remediation site.
r~i~itt
State Home CDLE Home Oil & Public Safety Top Feedback Page
Last modified: November 16, 2001
http:!/oil.cdIe.state.co.us/OIL/FundIconsultanucost2oguide1ines/rent4~uy.asp
10/13/2003
i’vtaxkSIlUtII KeasonUDtC
LuSts -
I ravel
I
I Ui
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Travel
Storage Tank Fund
Article 4, Part 9
4-9-I. AIRLINE TRAVEL
Airline travel will be reimbursed only to the extent it does not exceed the per-mile rate. The maximum reimbursement for
airline travel will be $138 each way, or $276 round-trip.
4-9-2. LODGING
The Fund will reimburse lodging at a rate that is actual and reasonable for the area. A receipt is required. The maximum
reimbursement will be $66 per room per night. Lodging will not be reimbursed unless the job site is at least 50 miles from the
office.
4-9-3. MEALS
No meals will be reimbursed without an allowable overnight stay. Three meals will be reimbursed for each allowable
overnight stay. No receipt is required for meal reimbursement. Meals will be reimbursed at Colorado the followingper diem
rate: $33 per day.
4-9-4. MILEAGE
The Fund will reimburse round-trip mileage from office to job site at 34.5 0/mile/vehicle/trip for standard and 4-wheel drive
vehicles. The Fund will reimburse for a maximum of 400 miles one way ($138), or 800 miles round trip ($276), per vehicle
trip. Mileage reimbursement will not be allowable for more than one vehicle per trip unless the use of multiple vehicles is
justified.
4-9-5. OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL
Out-of-state travel will be reimbursed, subject to the limits established by these guidelines, if the company does not have a
Colorado office.
4-9-6. TRAVEL
TIME
The Fund will reimburse for actual travel hours per employee, billed at the appropriate activity rate, for round-trip travel to
and from the job site.
4-9-7. VEHICLE RENTAL
The
Fund will not reimburse vehicle or company car rental charges, other
than
the standard reimbursement rate for mileage.
4-9-48.
MARKUP
No markup is allowed on any travel
charge.
State Home p COLE Home
I
~
p
lic Safe p Ipp I f~c4backPag~
Last modified: November 1?,2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/orL/Fundiconsultanvicost2oguideIjnes/lravel
asp
10/13/2003
MaxImum Reasonaoie Lusts
-
Miscellaneous
vage
i 01
m
-
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Storage Tank
Fund
.
Maximum Reasonable Costs- Miscellaneous
Article 4, Part 11
4-Il-I. EQUIPMENT REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT
The Fund will not reimburse the cost to repair or replace equipment that is damaged, lost, stolen, or destroyed due to
negligence or vandalism.
4-11-2. MATERIALS PROVIDED BY APPLICANT
Materials provided by the Applicant will be reimbursed at the Applicant’s cost. No markup by Applicant or consultant is
permitted.
4-11-3. PHOTOCOPYING
110/page. Only job-related photocopying will be reimbursed. No reimbursement will be paid for photocopying the Fund
application, any attachments to the application, or any documents or correspondence submitted pursuant to the application
process. The actual cost for color or enlarged photocopies requested by the OTS is reimbursable.
4-11-4. RUSH CHARGES
The Fund will not reimburse rush charges unless they (I) are justified by an environmental or public health and safety
emergency, or (2) reduce overall remediation costs.
4-11-5. VEHICLE RENTAL
The Fund will not reimburse vehicle rental charges with respect to a vehicle used to transport personnel or small equipment.
This includes the cost of renting a vehicle from a rental company, as well as rental charges for consultant-owned vehicles.
4-11-50. MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22.00)day)site. This includes such items as gloves, baggies, ice, water, rope, pens, etc. No receipts are required.
5t~eFfQnwI CPkEH~ni~
~t~Jr~tI~I
I OiL&hthiLc~S~fctyI Ipp E~e4ba&PjgcI
Last modified: November 16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fund/consultantlcost2oguidelines/miscell.asp
10/13/2003
ATTACHMENT
6
-u
C-,C-,
K
MI!I
a0—
G) 2~
-D
m
—1
(~ci,
c(D
—.
0
CD
—.
a-
C
C
C/)
—S
y
CDcn
xi
C,
m
z
-J
C)
C/)
0
a
(I)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SECTION 1: ACTIVITIES
ACTIVITY 00:
TANK REMOVAL
ACTIVITY 01:
INITIAL ABATEMENT
4
ACTIVITY 02:
PHASE-SEPARATED HYDROCARBON (P511) RECOVERY
5
ACTIVITY 03:
EXCAVATION/WASTE MANAGEMENT
8
ACTIVITY 04:
SITE ASSESSMENT
I
ACTIVITY 05:
RISK ASSESSMENT
16
ACTIVITY 06:
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) FEASIBILITY TESTING
..
17
ACTIVITY 07:
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
21
ACTIVITY 08:
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) PREPARATION
24
ACTIVITY 09:
REMEDIATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION
25
ACTIVITY tO:
OPERATION, MONITORING, & PERFORMANCE
32
ACTIVITY II:
SITE CLOSURE
36
SECTION 2: APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: REIMBURSABLE UNIT COSTS
PART!:
PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL/LABOR RATES
39
PART 2:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS COSTS
42
PART 3:
DRILLING, WELL INSTALLATION, AND DIRECT PUSH
TECHNOLOGY COSTS
43
PART 4:
TRAVEL COSTS
45
PARTS:
EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COSTS
46
PART 6:
EXCAVATION, BACKF1LLING, AND RESURFACING COSTS
..
50
PART 7:
SOILS AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT COSTS
51
PART 8:
REPORT GENERATION COSTS
52
PART9:
MARK-UP
54
PART 10:
CHANGE ORDERS
55
APPENDIX B: DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS
PART 1:
DEFINITIONS
58
PART 2:
ACRONYMS
59
INTRODUCTION
The objective of this document isto provide guidance for the evaluation of costs incurred in the
performance ofcorrective action activities associated with Leaking Petroleum Storage Tank (LPST)
sites.
The guidelines are not intended to set pricing for specific activities or to remove an element of
conpetition for the petroleum storage tank iniustry. Rather, the guidelines reflect the amount that
the FNRCC will reimburse for ~ctivitiesin all but extraordinary cases. Only costs that are, at or below
the published values in these guidelines will be reimbursed unless a site-specific justification for costs
exceeding the guidelines is submitted and approved.
The Reimbursable Cost Guidelines will be utilized by the TNRCC to evaluate ~nd proces~all cost
proposals and reimbursementclaims for corrective act!on activities associated with LPST sites. The
evaluation will utilize the guidelines in effect at the time the activities were performed.
The format ofthis document will allow individuals who are creating workplans and cost proposals
for various corrective action activities to arrive at nearly the same total cost that the TNRCC would
approve on a review of a workplan and cost proposal.
SECTION 1: ACTIVITIES
The following section presents the yarious corrective action activities, or phases/subphases of work,
normally conducted at an LPST site. Every effort has been made to put the reimbursable costs for
these activities into a format that is usable by owner/operators, contractors and consultants, and the
TNRCC to preapproveworkplans and cost proposals and to review applications for reimbursement.
The maximum r imbursable cost for the generation of a workplan and cost proposal is $115.00. This
amount is applicable to the first approved workplan and cost proposal for a given activity. If the
original workplan and cost proposal submitted to the TNRCC is unacceptable, the costs associated
with
that workplan and cost proposal are not reimbursable.
In addition, please be aware that the submission of a new cost proposal to gain preapproval for a
portion of an activity omitted from a previous workplan and cost proposal is not reim&ursable.
Each activity that follows will contain, where appropriate, a worksheet for that specific activity. In
addition, each worksheet will contain the reimbursable costs for the various subohases of each
activity, with accon~panyingnotes. These costs are condensed from the unit costs in A’ppendix A. For
your reference, definitions and acronyms used in this document are contained in Appendix B.
2
ACTIVITY 00: TANK REMOVAL
This section is effective for tanks removed on or after March 12, 1993.
A tank removal is defined as the physical removal of an ,underground storage tank (liST) from the
subsurface. Tank removals normally include the following activities: removal and replacement of
surface material; excavation, disposal, and replacement of backfill material (see Note I); tank
removal and disposal; backfilling and compaction ofthe excavation; and any other activity typicall
associated with the tank ~ejnoyalprocess. Please note that overexcavation is not part of the tan
removal process. This activity is covered in Activity 03: ExcavationIWaste Management.
Eligibility for the reimbursement ofa tank removal is based on two factors. First, the performance
of necessary corrective action as defined by Title 30, Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Chapter
334, Subchapter H §334.302 (a) (I) and (2) and second by §334.308 (b) and
(c) (N) (see Note
~).
The reimbursable amount will be based on the volume ofthe tanks removed
as shown in the table below.
Reimbursement oftank removals will be based on the volume ofthe tank(s) removed and will have
a maximum reimbursement limit of$8,000.00 per LPST site. For underground storage tanks having
a volume of 5,000 gallons or less, the reimbursable cost for removal will be $1,000.00. For
underground storage tanks having a volume of more than 5,000 gallons, the reimbursable cost for
removal will be $2,000.00.
TANK VOLUME
(GALLONS)
REIMBURSABLE COST
(PER TANK)
TOTAL MAXIMUM PER
LPST SITE
5000 OR LESS
$1,000.00
$8,000.00
GREATER THAN 5000
$2,000.00
$8,000.00
Notes:
irthe hackiili
from
an eligibie tank
removal has
been stored
at
the
site and analytical results indicate that those soils are above levels
thai
the 1
NRCC
w,ll
approve for return to the tankhotd, the owner/operator may request
approval for
the disposai
of
those soils under
Mu’ il,~03: Excavation.JWasteManagenient. igranted, the disposai ofthose soils will ía i outsudeofthe $8,0UO.00 maximum for a site.
(oniaci
your
TNRCC Region inspector or the INRCC Centrai Office Project Coordinator ror assistance.
2: On occasion a tank removal will occur where contamination has not penetrated beyond the excavation zone of native soiis of the
tankhnid. bui ~~herethe backfill is contammated above ieve!sthat the i
NRCC will approve for
return to
the
tankhoici While the tank
removal
~vili
noi
be elugihie for
reimbursement as required
in
30
TAC
§334.302 (a)
(3)
and
(2)
and §~34308
(b)
and
(cii 4). the disposal or treatment of the backfill may be reimbursable under §334.308
I
if the TNRLC directs andpreappmves in
~~Titing
the
disposai
or treatment
ofthe
backfill. Contact
your Region
inspector or
the
entral Office Project Coordmator for assistance.
3
ACTIVITY 01: INITIAL ABATEMENT
Initial abatement measures are those activities performed to reduce risk or threat to human health
safety, and the environment. These activities as outlined in 30 TAC §334.77 (relating to Initial
Abatement Measures and Site Check) can include any or all ofthe following:
Monitor and mitigate any fire and safety hazard posed by vapors or free product;
Removal ofproduct from tanks to prevent further release; and/or
Continuous free product removal (see note below).
Please note that reimbursement is based, in part, on the requirement that contamination must have
penetrated the native soils around the tankhold and that the contamination be above action levels 30
TAC §334.302(a)(l), (2), and (3).
Pursuant to 30 TAC ~334.3 10(f) and §334.322, all initial abatement and emergency measures that
continue after 72 hours including continuous phase-separated product recovery~mustS
preapproved by the TNROC prior to implementation. Contact the I NRCC Central Office Project
Coordinator or the local I NRCç Region Inspector for assistance. Costs for initial abatement
submitted in the Application for Reimbursement should be identified and subipitted~with Justification
to the TNRCC. AR costs associated with tntttal abatement are subject to vertficatton. Al! unit costs
incurred during Initial Abatement will be reimbursed based on these Reimbursable Cost Guidelines.
Costs for Initial Abatement must be preapproved after 72 hours. Use the worksheet under Activity
02: PSI-I Recovery to prepare cost proposals for additional abatement work.
I
Note: Please refer to the definition of “free product,” “recoverable free product,” and “free product
~ffi~ration” in Appendix B.
4
ACTIVITY 02: PHASE-SEPARATED
HYDROCARBON (PSH) RECOVERY
This subsection will be used for the recovery of Phase Separated Hydrocarbons (PSH, Phase
Separated Petroleum, or free product- See Note below) after the Initial Abatement phase. In
addition, the worksheet in this section will be used for preapproval ofInitial Abatement activities
after the first 72 hours of site work.
30 TAC §334.3 0 (1) states that the continuous recovery of PSH needs preapproval after the Initial
Abatement period of 72 hours. In cases where free product poses an imminent danger to human
health, safety, and the environment, 30 TAC §334.79 requires that the owner/operator remove PSH
to “the maximum extent practicable.” Ifan emergency situation extends beyond 72 hours, contact
the TNRCC Central Office Project Coordinator or the local TNRCC Region inspector for assistance.
For non-emergency situations, the Release Report required by §334.77 (b) should be submitted with
a workplan and cost proposal either for the continued recovery ot free product or for the
preparation of an Interim Corrective Action Plan (ICAP) for the installation of a ?i~eeproduct
recovery system. If the development of an ICAP is approved, and the ICAP itself is approved, the
actual installation of the recovery system is discussed under Activity 09: Remediation System
Installation.
Note: Please refer to the definitions of “free product,” “free product
migration,”
“LNAPL,” and “recoverable free product” in
Appendix B.
WORKSHEET FOR THE MANUAL RECOVERY
OF
PSH
AND
CONTINUING INITIAL ABATEMENT
Part
A: Personnel Costs
Section I - CAP Generation
-
See Note t
-
TESt
ACTIVITY
HOURS/UNITS
RATE
TOTAL
iC’.P
Preparation and Submission
Lump
51825.00
$1,825.00
Total, Section 1
$1825.00
Section 2: OfficeCoils See Nine 2i
ITEM
ACTIVITY
HOURS/UNITS
RATE
TOTAL
F.4R- P514 Recovery or Sysreni O&\I
Report Preparation & Submiision
I
$260.00
5260.00
Pro~ecr‘tanager tP’ti
Maasagemcist’Regulatoiy toterectioni
.1/Mouth
$80.00
Sian E/Gli (SF)
Data Review/Update Files
.51lonth
$7000
Cost Proposai’.voikplan
Cost PoopoaaliWoekpi,as Preparation & Submission
-
I
$115.00
$1
15.00
Toni, Section 2
5
Section
3:
Field Personnel Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
OF WELLS
5/WELL
TOTAL
Technician I (TI)
Measure PSH. Remove PSH..c75’decp
$40.00
Technician’ (TI)
Measure P5FI, Remove P51-1.76’ To i 10’ deep
560,00
Technician 1(11)
Measure P514, Rennove PSH -, I tO’ deep
$80.00
-
Subtotal,
Sertion 3
P of Site V icita
Total,
Section 3
TOTAL.
PART A
Part B: Equipment Costs - See
Note 3
ITEM
UNITS
UNIT
COST
TOTAL
Absoebesi Socks
$10.00
Passive
S)sunmce (Small)
$350.00
Passive Skimmer (Large)
$750.00
Dedicated PVC Bailer
$15.00
Drums
$40.00
Small hems
$20.00/Site/Day
(Other)
Other)
(Other)
Subtotal, Pars B
15 Mark-up
TOTAL, PART B
Part
(‘:
Waste
Management Costs
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuum
Tn.cL
$75.00/noun
Elsid Disposal
$0.40/Gallon
Subtotal
10 Mark-up
.
TOTAL, PART C
Part
0:
l’ravel Costs - See Note
4
ITEM
tJNITS/IOURS
RATE
TOTAL
Equipment Truck
S(4O.00/Day
SI,leac’e (Os-re 00Miles. Rnsnd Trip)
-
$0.31
Tsasel Time
$40.00/How
6
Ai,~re
Per Diem
fartE:
Other Costs-See Note3
ITEM
UNITS
RATE
TOTAL
Subtotal
15 Mark-up
-
TOTAL PARTE
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS A-E
hoses:
I:
Please refee to Appendix A: Unit Costs fort breakdown ofreponi genembon coats.
2:
Please refer to Appendix A: Unin Costs for a breskdown ofpenonmei coats.
3:
Mark-up
is for
aubcons.csed expenses only.
4: Please refer no the patti section ofAppendix A:
UnitCosta before preparing dais Section.
7
ACTIVITY 03: EXCAVATION/WASTE
MANAGEMENT
This subsection will be used when contaminated soils will be excavated, transported and disposed,
or when a significant quantity of contaminated water collects in an excav~tion.ISo not use this
section for the disposal of soil or water generated as a result of other activities, such as drilling,
remedial system installation, groundwater monitoring, or operation, maintenance, and performance.
That waste management is mcluded as a line item in those activities. The worksheet presented below
has been divided based on sub-phases ofthe overall activity. Not all parts may be applicable to all
situations, so use only those sections that are specific to your needs to determine reimbursable costs.
WORKSHEET FOR EXCAVATION/WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOILS TABLE
-
Determining the Quantities to be
Used
in the Worksheet
EXCAVATED UNIT
WIDTH (FT)
LENGTH (FT)
SURFACE
AREA (SQET)
DEPTH (IT)
IN SITU VOL (CFT)
IN SITU VOL (CY)
Original Excavation
Ovcee-ccavaxson Aces I
Overexcavatson Area 2
.
Osetexcas
stion Area
3
Overescarason Area 4
Total Surface Ares, Areas 1—4, in Square Feet
Total In Situ Volume, areas 1-4, in Cubic Yards
Part
A: Personnel Costs
Seesson I Office arid Fixed Field Cnsls
ITEM
ACTIVITY
-
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
‘p1cc
I
si
snarer
((‘\i)
Management,
Regulatory
Interaction
2
$80.00
$160.00
held 11:0-I) 105
Insaxial silt
sea~sspsaid
coondisisnion
3
$65.00
$195.00
lick .~ctis
its- Report
Preparation and Sabmission
I
$415.00
$485.00
Woslsplanx Cmi Pts’posal
Preparation and Subm,saion
I
$115.00
$115.00
Tout. Section I
$995.00
Seclion
2
Field Orerstghi Coos
-
See Note I
ITEM
UNITS
UNITCOST
TOTAL
Field F/C/H (FOE Technician II (T3)
(Toial From Soils Table)
$5.00/CY
.
Total, Seelion 2
TOTAL, PARTA
Part B: Excavation and Remove/Replace Cover -
See Note 2
ACTIVITY
UNITS
UNIT
COST
TOTAL
Remote Cover lAuphalt)
- Tonal
From Soils Table
$2.50/SqFt
Remote Cosrr (Concrete)- Total From Soils Table
$4.00/SqFt
8
Excavate Soils
-
Total in Situ Volume From Soils Table
$9.00/CY
Visquter., I 20’s
t0~
TOW100 cy, I toll miximum
$60.00/Rob
Import Backfill. Total In Situ Voltune from Soils Table N 1.3
$1 1.00/CY
Cosnpact Backfill
$9.00/Cl
Rrplacr Cover (Asphalt). From Soils Table
$3.50/SqFt
Replace Cover (Concrete) -
From Soils Table
$5.50/SqFt
Disposables (I wait per site day)
$20.00
Subtotal
Part B
15 Mark-nap
TOTAL, PART B
Part
C:
Waste Management Costs- See Note 3
ACTI\nTY
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
Load & Haul Excavated Soils - Tonal In Situ Volume from Soils Table X I.)
-
$14.00/CY
Mileage for Soils Disposal.5O miles one way
Loaded Mile
$2.50/mile
Dispose Soils 1500 TPH
its Landfill
- Set Note 4
$10.50/CY
Dispose Soils 1500 TPI4 in Landfill
$45.00/CY
Dispose Sods 1500 TPH by Asphalt Recycling
$35.00/CY
Dispose Soils 1500 TPH by B,orrmed,ation
$35.O0/CY
Dispose Sonb 1500 TPH by Tbeemat Desovpssons
$45.00/CY
Vacuum Tnack (Fluids Transport for Disposal)
$75.00/Hr
Fluids Disposat
$0.40/Gal
Subchaptci Ii
Isnschstge
Os Alirmair Disposal Menliod (Drscr,be m
Woek plan)
As Needed
Subtotal, Part C
10 Mark-up
-
TOTAL,PARTC
Part U: Analytical Costs -
See Note 5
TESS
UNITS
UNITCOST
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
UNITCOST
TOTAL
TPtI - Soil
$47.50
TCLP Lead
593(10
TPtt (Ruclil
-
Soil
$7125
TCLP lieneent
$152.00
OTEX
-
Soil
$62.50
TPII
-
Waler
$49.00
t5Tti\ Rush
-
Soil
$93.75
TPH (Rush) -Water
$73.50
PAte (1100)- Sosl
Sn4a.oo
BUN-
Wanet
$6230
P.~SI112701- Soil
$222.00
LITEX (Rush) -
Water
$93.15
Toial Lead
-
Soil
$31.00
Total Less ‘Water
$31.00
Tonal Lead IRush) ‘Soil
$46.50
Total Lead (Rush) -Waler
$46.50
TON
-
Soil
$9100
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
9
RCRA Metals
-
Soil
$150.00
(Oilier)
Subtotal, Part D
10 Mark-up
TOTAL PART P
Part E: Travet Costs
- See Note
6
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Tnsclc
$140.00/Day
Mitts$c (oseT 100. Roiandleip)
50.3/Mile
Teasel Time
$50.00 or $65.00/How
Per Diem
$80.00/Day
Aieftrc
ByNced
TOTAL PARTE
TOTAL
ACTIVITY COSTS,
PARTS A-E
Notes:
I: Preapproval and reimbursement wsII be based on the expectation that
300CY o(soila canbe excavated, singed and satnpled asia 10-how day, and than 300CY ofsoils can loaded,laasaled. and
disposed while 300 CY of soils can be tnsponed and compacted, again
In amgle day. Oversight tsine may be spIne among pertoranel in
any way the RCAS des!res. The $5.00 per csabcc yard
of
excavated soils is the maximum reimbursable cost for all phases
orthe actviw. Iflist acDvtly consists ofonly disposang ot’pressoua~’atockplaled soils aoad/or tasapontiog and conuspaceung fill, the
oversight coal will be $2 50/Cf.
2: Refer to Appendsx A. Pant 6 foss bxeakdown of these costs. Manic-up ix sHowed on xssbeonncsed coals only.
3:
Refer so Appendix
A,
Pan 7 for a breakdown ofthese costs.
4: The nosed cost foe disposal of isnpscned soils isa maximum withoutjiaseifscation. Reimbursable costs will be actiaai landfill receipts,
plus allowable mast-sip. Traasspots and landfill receipts must be
submnnsrd with
the
applicataon for ecnmbuesesnenn.
5: ReIn so Appendix A. Part 2 for a breakdowns ofanalytical costs.
6:
Refer to Appendix A, Past 4 for a breakdown ofsravrl costs
I0
ACTIVITY 04: SITE ASSESSMENT
This subsection will be used for the installation ofwells or borings to define the im_pact of a release
or when the installation of a remediation system
IS
approved by the TNRCC. ilie worksheet is
divided to allow the preparation ofnumerous types ofcost prqposals based on need, ~se only those
sections that are required fpr the specific phase ofwork. A Risk Assessment (RA) will normally be
done in conjunction with Site Assessment work, and those report generation costs are Included here.
Ifa site does not require additional field work to complete an RA, refer to Activity 05: Risk
Assessment.
WORKSHEET FOR SITE ASSESSMENTS
Part
A: Personmel Costs-See Note I
Section I Plantaing, Fixed Field and Office Costs, Gaining Off-site Accent - See Note 2
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURSiUNITS
TOTAL
Pretsminan- Planning
-
See Note 3
Site Familiajizations
$390.00
I
Waler WeIl/ Other Facility Search
Identify Other
WellsiFaeilinies Near Site
$300.00
I
Walking Receptor Ssn’ey
FirldTime 10 identify Receptors
$300.00
I
Sise.’Monstoring Well Sun,ury
Detrntnine Well Elevations
$300.00
I
W’orkplasilCosls Propoual
Preparation and Submission
5115.00
I
$115.00
Offuise Access- See Role 3
Research owsserstsip and make ‘initial written request for
Offsste Dnlling
$320.00/OfI’site Peopeety
Total, Settles I
Section 2: Variable Office and Field Personnel Coins -
See None 4
Ssbsecsson 2A. Basic Report Generation Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURSRJNITS
TOTAL
No Report Required
Submit Results (Labs and Drillers’ Logs) Only
$0.00
0
FAR
-
Site Atsessistent
Preparation arid Submssaioss
£455.00
I
Plan A Risk Assrssmrus Report Fonts
Preparation and Subminsioss
$2,140.00
I
Plan B Risk Auseosment
Preparason and
Submission
$5,715.00
I
R~,lipslsse
Preparation sod Sobmissioss
$455.00
I
Total, Subsection 2A
Subsecuon 2B Additional Office Personnel Costs, Corivenenonal Drilling, 3 WcllnjBoriasgn pee evens
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Pro;ect 5-tanager (PSI)
Project Oversight
$40 00/Well or Boning
Draftupersos (Dl)
Boring & Well Logs, CAD
$22.50/Well or Boring
.
Word Processor (\VP)
Report Prep
I7.$OiWrll or
Boring
.
Total, Subaeetion 2B
Subsection 2?’: Addisuonat Office Peesouaxet Costs, Otsect Push
11
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Project Manager (PM), Jut Day
Project Oversight
$8000
2
$160.00
Drafsxperxont(DI), Isifley
Boeissg&WeltLogu,CAD
$45.00
2
$90.00
Word Processor (WP),
1st Day
Report Prep
$35.00
I -
$35.00
Psoject Manager fl°M),Each Adds’I
t/~
Day
,
Project Oversighs
$40.00
Draftsperson I (DI), Each Addt’I
/2
Day
Boring & Well Logs,
CAD
$22.50
Word Processor (WP), Each Adds’)
‘/2
Day
Report Prep
5)1.50
Total, Subsection 2C
Subsection 20: Dsilliesg in Sand/Silt/Clay tenth Hollow Stem Augers
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Field Engineer/Geologist (ED) &
Technician! (TI)
Install Borings, 25’ Minimums, Lump
Sum, 2
Hru/Borisag
$22000/Boentug
Field Essgsnree/Geologise (ED) it
Techssicssss
t
(TI)
Insetstl Wells, 25’ Müsitmsuns, Lump Sum, 2,5 Usc/Well
$275.OOfWetI
Field Engirseer/Geologiun (FD)& Technician I (TI)
Install Boringu,
Sum ofFootage Over 25’, All Borings
$7.69/Foot
Field Engissees/Geologisi(FD) & Technician I (TI)
Install Wells, Sum ofFoosage Oven 2$’, All Wells
$991/Foot
Total, Subsection 20
Subsection 2E: Drilling wills Air/)slsad Rosasy
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNITCOST
UNITS
TOTAL
held Engineer/Geologisi (Fl)) & Technician I (TI)
Install Borings, 25 Minimum, Lsaenp Sum, 1.25 Bit/Boning
$138.00/Boeing
Field Esginrer/Geologisi (FD) it Technician I (TI)
Install Wells, 25’ Minsmuns, Lump Suns. 2.5 Mrs/Well
$27500/Well
Field Erusnrer’Geologsoi (FD) & Technician I (TI)
Install Boringu, Sum ofFootage Over 25’, Alt Borings
$512/Fool
Field Engin err/Geologist (Fl)) it Technician I (TI)
Install Wells, Sum ofFootsgr Over 25’, Alt Wells
$940/Foot
Total, Subsecnon 2E
Subsection 2E Drsllissg with Att Coring
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Field Esginecs/Geulogist (FO) it Technician I (TI)
Install Bosings, 25’ Misssmssns, t_un,p Sum, 2 Mrs/Boring
$220 OO/Bosing
Field Engineer/Geologist (FD) it Technicsan I (TI)
Install Wells, 25 Minimusis, Lump Sum, 2.5 l’ln.,’WelI
$275.00/Well
Field t±isgssrer:Geologict(FD)
it Technsciasn I (Tt)
Install Botinsgs. Sum ofFootsgc Oven 2$’, Alt Borings
$l33/Ioot
Field
EsgiteerGeoloc.isi )FD) it Technician I (TI)
Install Wellu, Sum of Footage Over 25’, All Wellu
$9.57/Foot
Total, Subsection 2F
Subsection
26
Direct Push
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Field Engsnetr/Geologisl (FD)
St
Technician I (TI)
First Day, Lunsp Stints
$1,100.00
I
$1,100.00
Field Engsneer/Geologist (ED) it Tecluiician I (TI)
Each Additional
54
Day
$55000
Total, Subsection 20
Total, Settles 2
‘
12
TOTAL,
PARTA
Part B:
Drilling Costs
-
See Note 5
Section I: Conventional Dulling Costs
Subsection IA: Wonkuheel Von Conveotiontal Drilling Costs Drilling Method:
Hollow Stem Augers
Air/Mud Rotace
—
Air Coring
BORINGS
2” WELLS
4” WELLS
ITEM
UNITS
S/UNIT
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
$/UNIT
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
S/UNIT
TOTAL
hiss
25 Fees
First25 Feet
First 2$ Fees
26.SOFeet
26’SOFeet
26-5OFeeI
51-I00Feet
51.IOOFeet
51-lOOFeet
‘lOOFees
IOOFeen
l00Feet
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
6’ WELL S
OTHER
SUBTOTALS
ITEM
UNITS
S/UNIT
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
$UNIT
TOTAL
BORINGS
Firsi 25 Feet
First 25 Feet
2” WrlIa
26 - 50 Feel
26 - 50 Feet
4’ Wells
SI - 00Feet
SI- 00Feel
6’ WrIls
100 Feel
~I00 Feet
Other
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
Total, Subsection IA
Subsection 18. Other Costs. Convesational Drilling
.
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNITCOSTS
UNITS
TOTALCOST
Mobs)szasion.’I)etstobulsntion
Pint 50 Miles, One Way
$245.00
I
Slobslintiois,-Demohstszasson
Mileage’ 50, Maximum Additional 200 One Way
$2.50/Mile
Drill Crew Ptr Diem
Each Overnight Slay, IfRequired
$190.00/Day
Small Items
I
jun r site day)
$20.00
Total, Subiretion I B
Subtstal, Section I
55 Mark-up
Total, Section I
Secnon
2-
Direct Push Technology
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Direct Itush
nit
Install Boruigs
$ 1,410.00/Day
Dsrecs Push I ‘nil
Install Wells, Over Staisdarcl Unit Cons
S I2.50/Foot
Dsrect P05h Until
Install Borings, ifTolal Footage
C
I IS Fret
$12.50/Foot
Mobslszassoivoemoh,Iinlson
First 50 Miles, One Way
$145.00
I
Slobilszat,oic’Demobslszat,on
Mileage ‘50. Maxin,uois Additional 200. One Way
$1.90/Mile
13
Dells Ceew Per Diem
Each Ovensighl Stay, IfRequired
$150.00/Day
Small Items (I unity site day)
$20.00
Ssbsotal, Snt’aos I
15
Mark-tap
Total, Sectios 2
TOTAL, PART B
Part
C~
Waste Management Costs’
See
Note 7
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuum Track
$75.COfl~our
Fluids Disposal
$0.40/Gallon
Soils Disposal
$250.00 Base
+
$10.50/CY
Soils Disposal
$250.00 Base
+
$45.00/Oman
Subchaptrr H Discharge or Alternate Disposal Method
At Needed
Subtotal, Part C
10 Mark-up
TOTAL, PART C
l5afl Dr Analytical Costs
-
See Note 6
ITEM
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
TPI I
-
Soil
$47.50
ISTEX ‘Soil
$62.50
TPI4.Waset
$49.00
BTE.X
-
th
atrr
$62.50
BTE.\ .\ITHF
-
~hsIer
$g5.0o
Total teat). Soil
$31.00
l5.ii 11(51(5))- Soil
$148.00
P:~5l(tilO)’’s”sIet
$158.00
F/sIt (127(1) -Soil
$222.00
F/sIt (1270). Water
$249.00
TDS.’Aateu
$55.00
\‘OC - Soil
$295.00
‘DC -
\t
amer
$295.00
ECRA Metals - Soil
$150.00
Soil Paran’enen
p00.00
Shipping
-
$5.00/Sample
(Other)
(Other)
14
Subtotal, Part I)
505’.
Mark-up
TOTAL, PART I)
Part E: Travel Costs - 5ee
Note S
ITEM
UNITCOST
UNITS/hOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Track
$140.00/Day
Mileage (over 00, Round Trip)
$0.3 I/haIile
Travel Time (Field Engineer/Geologist and/or Tectsnician I)
$65.00
aatd/or $40.00/Noise
Pet Diem
SgO.OO/Day/?erson
Airfare
By Need
Disposable Bailees
$8.00/sWell
Dnsnss
$40.00
-
TOTALPARTE
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS A-E
Notes:
I: Please refer to Appendix A, Part I for a brealcdoteo ofpeusonnel costs.
2:
Not all ofihcae actsvitirs areapplicable to all tiles. Use only the items that relate directly to the site for wtsicls this worksheet is being used. Ifs licensed surveyor needs to be subcontracted and
thai coal exceeds the noted maximum of$300.00, submit quotes with the cont proposal.
3:
“Prelstssinaty Planning” ehargen apply only to sites whrte a Risk Asseosnient has not been perfomsed. Preliminaiy Plumingactivities ahould include a site hiauony review, air. geolo,gylsydrogeology/
Isthology research, and the mcoepomnon ofthesennitive rece.piorsuney data into the proposal for the nfl assetsment. Ttmehr the Prelimusaryplasuimg consi5ss oftwohoiats each ot l’roject
Manager, StafTGeologisv’Engsneer, and Techisicisat II tame. Tlsese costs do notneedpeeapproval pnorlo conspleong the act,vtt’ea becausethey are used so prepase theSrtçAaseaament wotls.plan and
cost ptopossl. Peelsmimsas’, Flanssm~costs smusa be sncluded m sisal cosa pioponal and be approved by the INRUC lobe reimbursable. ‘Offsssr Access” costs uacsude acovss’es through the intisal wnttcn
request lot access lithe initial wriTten request ii denied,
an
addit,onal $320.00 is available foe the imiereaued level ofefl’on. lfthese coats are imucuited they must be docsnnesnted up by aubnsitttng all
writscncot-tespondesxce with the offssse tando-..mecso the ThRCCwith the applsrsuon lot neumbsstsemems. Alt offsss access cosis that exceed 5640.Od muss be pteapproved through a changenote.
4:
Nor all ofthese scnsssbes are applicable so all sites. Use only the items that relate directly to the site for which thss wottcshees is being used. Referto Appendix A, Past S lot Report Generation
Costs
5:
Please refer to Appendix A, Pan 3 forcost broken out by media. Use only one ecsnvesational drilling method forSectson A. Use only the items that relate directly so the aite forwhiclt thu worksheet
is being used Slack-up may only be appliedto subeonincted costs.
6:
p1 ease te Icr lo Appendix A, Pars 2 for addniional latsoraroiy analyucu and costs. Mark-up is allowed only on nutaconeacied items.
7; PIe asr trier so Appends.x A. Part 7 for a breakdow,a ofwasie management costs.
5: FJc’a.sr rctt’r ci Appendix A, Parr 4 fort breakdowss ofts’avel policy and costs. ‘Travel Time” costs are based on the individual(n) traveling to the site on specific days
to peefoum specific tasks,
Dctanc the’aoi I, schedule in site worlcplan so back up all navel reqssesls.
ACTIVITY
05:
RISK ASSESSMENT
This subsection will be used when the need exists to quantify the risk of the contamination at a site.
There are two Risk Assessments (RAs) that will normally be conducted, and are known as “Plan A”
and “Plan B” RAs, If sufficient assessment work has been done at a site,
it
may be possible to
generate either a Plan A or a Plan B RA without conducting further field work. If additional field
work
IS
necessary to generate an RA, please refer to “ActIvity 04: Site Assessment.” The costs
noted here a~efor report generation only.
PLAN A
RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT GENERATION COSTS
-
See Note I
I
15
PERSONNEL TYPE
RATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Principal Engineer (P3)
$110.00
I
$110.00
ProjectManager(PM)
$gO.00
12
$960.00
SmaffGeologist/Emigineer(SF)
$70.00
S
$560.00
Dtaftiperaon II (1)2)
$50.00
6
$300.00
Word Processor (WP)
$3500
6
$21000
L
TOTAL
$2140.00
PLAN II
RISK
ASSESSMENT REPORT GENERATION COSTS- See
Note I
PERSONNEL TYPE
KATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Prsaicipat Engineer (Pa)
$110.00
6
$660.00
Project Manager (PM)
$80.00
32
$2,560 00
SiaffGeologiuk’Fngineer (SF)
570.00
25
$1,750.00
Draf’tspernon 11(1)2)
-
$50.00
tO
$500.00
\t’rtd Processor (WF’)
$35 00
7
$245.00
.
TOTAL
$L715.O0
Note,:
-
I: A total of$ 15.00 above the noted costs is available for reimbursing the cost ofthe workplan and cost proposal to generate a ‘ntand alone” risk assessment. Please referso ThRCC Guidance
Maessasls v~hempcston,snmg Rnsk Assesssvessts.
16
ACTIVITY 06: CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
FEASIBILITY TESTiNG
This subsection will be used when testing is required to complete a CAP- This testin~mayinclude
aquifer~pumptests, slug and bail tests, soil vapor extraction tests, or a combination o any of these
tests. Costs are Included in this activity to format information gained in the field for inclusion Into
the CAP Testing Rçport. For the cost ofgenerating the CAP, use the section entitled “Activity 08:
Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Preparation.”
Part I ofthe worksheet is designed to provide reimbursable personnel costs forthe various kinds of
tests to be conducted at the site, whether 6-hour, 12-hour, or 24-hour tests. The costs for each kind
oftest should be added together to reflect total personnel costs for the activity. Then complete the
subsequent parts of the worksheet relating to equipment, !a~testing, waste disposal, and travel time
for the specific tests being conducted to obtain total activity costs.
WORKSHEET FOR CAP TESTING
Part A: Personnel Costs -
See Note I
Secnon I: Slug and Bail Testing
ITEM
ACTIViTY
RATE
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Setnscv Engiocec/Cleoiogisn(t’2)
Office Preparaison, Project Mstsagesnent, Debriefmg
$95.00
3
$2S5.0o
Field Etgineer/Gcologiui (ED)
Office Ps’epmntion, Field Work, Debrietang
565,1*
10
5650.00
Associate Engineer/Geologist (P1)
Data Analygis. Report Preparation
$85.00
5
$425.00
Technician II (T2)
Office Preparation. Field Work, Debriefing
$45.00
ID
$450.00
Dtsftsperson 11(1)2)
Data Fonnaning
$50.00
I
$50.00
V,otd Ptocescot (WP5
Data Foemstting
-
$35.00
2
570.00
Aitdstiossl time over 6 hours
Field time, including ED and T2
$110.00
P1.7 Standard ti’sempeioti Eons,
Preparation and uubmiss,on
$195.00
If Required
~toskpIan& Ctssms Proposal
$115.00
I
$15.00
I”Tstal,
Section I
Section 2 Aqsss(ct Pump Textsng
ITEM
ACTIVITY
RATE
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Sessot i1ngstseerGeologsst (P2)
Office Prrpsraison. Project Management, Debriefing
$95.00
3
$285.00
Field Ercsnecr Gcologsut (ED)
Office Preparation, Field Work. Debriefing
‘
$65.00
10
$650.00
Assncsaie Engineer/Geologist (P1)
Dais Analysis, Repeal Preparation
$85.00
5
5425.00
Tecinixscsan II (T2)
Office Preparation. Field Wok. Debriefing
$45.00
tO
$450.00
Drsltsperson II D2)
Oats Fomsameing
$50.00
I’
$50.00
Word Proceusor (WP(
Data Analysis, Report Preparation
$35.00
2
$70.00
Addiuorial nme over 6 hours, per hour
Field time, including ED and T2
$110.00
Pt-? Standard Exemption Fonss
Preparation and submission
5195,00
ifRequired
Wotkplsts & Cost Propotsi
5115.00
I
5115.00
17
Total, Section 2
Vapor Exoaction Teasing
ACTIVITY
RATE
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
(P2)
Office Preparation, Project Managesnent, Debeiefmg
595.00
-
3
$285.00
(ED)
-
Office Preparation, Field Work, Debriefing
565.00
10
$650.00
(P1)
Data Anab’sis, Report Preparation
$85.00
S
$425.00
Office Prepanalions, Field Wont, Debritfsng
$45.00
tO
$450.00
Data Foematlsng
$50.00
I
$50.00
Data Analysis, Report Preparation
$35.00
2
$70 00
hours, perhour
Field time, including
ED
and T2
$110.00
Foam
Preparation and submission
$195.00
lfgequia-ed
5115.00
t
$115.00
Total, Section 3
Extraction Testing
ACTIVITY
RATE
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
(P2)
Office Preparations, Project Management, Debriefuig
$95.00
3
$285.00
(FD)
Office Pieparanion, Field Wok, Debniefsng
$65.00
IS
5975.00
(P1)
Data Analysis, Report Preparation
585.00
8
5680.00
Office Preparation. Field Worst, Debriefing
$45.00
IS
$675.00
Data Fonnattsng
$50.00
2
$100.00
Data Analyais, Report Preparation
535.00
3
$105.00
hours, pet bout
Field aunt, includingED and 12
$110.00
Eonn
Preparation and submission
$195.00
IfRrquirrd
$115.00
I
$115.00
Total, Section
4
TOTAL, PART A
Costs
-
See Note 2
ITEM
UNITCOST/DAY
UNITS
TOTAL
$65.00
5115.00
$75.00
$25.00
535.00
$95.00
Hotsepowet)
$20.00
dual-phase exssacnion tess) - See Nose 3
5650.00
18
SVE
Traiter (contains all equipment)
$500.00
Air sUipper
$250.00
Holding tank (2,000 Gallon)
$25.00
Carbon Canister, includes installation, eecycling, and/or diaposal
$750.00
Holding Tank (5,000 Gallon)
$3500
Small lscs,sn
$2000/Site/Day
Miscellaneous Supplies
$5000/Teat
(Other)
(Other)
Subtotal,
Part B
15
Mark-up
TOTAL, PART B
Part
C: Waste Management Costs
-
See Note 4
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuum Tonsck
$75.00/Hour
Fluids Dsuposal
$0.40/Gallon
Subchapter Ii Dsucharee orAlnemane Disposal Method (Describe in Work Plan.)
As Needed
Subtotal, Part C
10
Mark-up
TOTAL, PART C
Part
fl. .&malytical Costs
-
See NoteS
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
IPII 5 ttstet/
$49.00
Brt-:X sS~aseeI
$62.50
BTEX (Art)
56250
Tonal Lead (Water)
531,00
(Goitre)
(Ott cc)
Ted/at Bags (or Anr Samples
57.50
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
Subtotal, Part D
10
Mark-up
TOTAL PART D
Part
E:
Travel Costs- See Note 6
I
19
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Tnack
$54000/Day
Mileage (over 200, Round Trip)
$0.31
Travel Time (ED and 12combined)
SI
50,00/Hour
Per Diem
55O.00/Person/Day
Airfare
By Need
TOTAL PARTE
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS A-EJ
Nones:
I: Please rtler to Appendix A, Pars I for a breakdown ofpetoonnel costs.
2: Please refer to Appendix A. PanS for a breakdown ofequipnsesss costs. Masis-upin allowed for rented itemnn ordy and rental receipta must aceomnpas,y tine application for rtinsnbursenent,
3:
Every cOors alsould be made to schedule two sites consecutively for testing with a liquid-ring pump due to nIne high rental coats for this equipmenL
4: Please refer to Appendix A, Past 7 for a breakdown ofwaate nsanagesasent coats.
5: Please refer to Appendix A, Part 2 for additional laboratoty aisalysea and costs. Maolc-up in allowed Doily on subcontaeted ten’s.
6:
Please refer to Appendix A. Pail 4 for a breakdown oftravrl policy and costs.
20
ACTIVITY 07: GROUNDWATER MONITORING
This subsection will be used at sites where no remediation system is kn operation but periodic
groundwater monitoring will be conducted, or when groundwater testing is necessary to
determine
~ natural attenuation
is an appropriate remedial optios for a, site. Sites where a rqmediatioi~system
is
in
operation and groundwater monitonn~is also required will use the section entitled ecAct(vlw 10:
Operation, Monitoring, & Performance’ to develop cost proposals.
WORKSHEET
FOR
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
Part
A:
Persomaaiel Costs -
See Note I
Srcsion I: Fnxed Asxssssal Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Project Manager (PM)
Management, Regulatomy Interaction
$80.00
5
$400.00
FAR’ Annual Grotsrmdwatee Monitosing
Report
Prepamxtionand Submission
$440.00
I
FAR-Single Ntontsanng Evens
Puepasstiosn and Submission
$260.00
I
Workplsn & Coun Proposal
Preparation and Submioumoti
$15.00
I
$115.00
Total,
Section I
Section 2: Bess Quarter Pensoomel Costs oe SingleMonitoring Event
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
SmsliEngtneer;Geologmst (SF)
Field Preparation, Dams Fonnatfing
$70.00
2
5140,00
Teclnorcrsn I (TI
Purge and Sample Wells. Firat 25’
540 00/Well
—
Techntcmar I (TI)
Purge and Sample Wellu. Each Additional 25(75’ Mn)
$10.00/Additional 25’AVeII
Tonal,
Secnioni 2
5cc’iron
S
ecattid Onartct Prrsonnel Costs
~E~l
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
St.stft neroscer Geologist (SF)
Field Peepanboes, Dali Fonmetring
570.00
2
$140.00
Tech sic tan I/TI)
Purge and Sample Wells, First 25’
$40.00/Well
Trcbormcmsom 1/TI)
Purge and Sample Wellu. Each Additional 25’ (75’ Max)
$10.00/Addinionsl 25/Well
Total, Section 3
Sec trio ‘I Third Quarter Personnel Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNITCOST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Ssafl’Fnctnrer (;enlcogtsl (SEt
Field Preparation, Data Fonssnatting
$70.00
2
$140.00
Techtiler/or lilt
/
Purge and Sample Wells, Brat 25’
540,00/Well
Technician! IT!)
.
Pourge arid Sample Welts, Each Additional 25’ (75’ Max)
510,00/Additional 25/Well
Total,
Section 4
Sec troll
S
Fourth Qasrier Personnel Coats
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
(
TOTAL
21
Staff Eogitsecr/Geologiat (SF)
Field Preparation, Data Formatting
$70.00
2
$140.00
Technician 1ff I)
Purge and Sample Wells, rirst 25’
540,00/ Well
Technician I (‘F I)
Purge and Sample Wells, Each Additional 25’ (75’ Mn)
$ 0,00/Additional 25/Well
Total, Section 5
TOTAL, PART A
Part B: Equipment Costs
- See
Note 2
ITEM
UNIT
COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Disposable bailers
$8.00/well
Small items
$20.00/nile/day
Dnsmn (55-gallon, for purge water)
$40.00
(Other)
(Other)
Saibtesal,
Pars B
15 Mark-op
‘
TOTAL,PARTB
I
Part C:
Waste Mnusagemenat
Costs
-
See Note 3
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuum Truck
$75.00/Hour
Fluid Disposal
$0.40/Gallon
Suhrlaapter It Dsscharge or Altensals Dosponal Method (Describe in Workçmlan)
As Needed
Sobtolal, Part C
tO Stark-tap
TOTAL, PART C
P-art
U:Analytical
(‘oslS -5ee
Note 4
ANALYTICALTEST
UNITCOST
UNITS
TOTAL
TPbt!BTEX
$111.50
TPI-l/BTE,X w/ MUSE
$13400
TDS
$15.00
PAFI (610)
$158.00
PAhI(g270)
$24900
Chlondcs
$lg.00
lion
$10.00
Nou,mea
$24.00
Phoophasu
$24.00
Sulfaten
$24.00
Tool Organic Carbon (ICC)
$32.00
22
Sluppirag
$5.00/Sample
(OTHER)
(OTHER)
Subtotal,
PatiO
10
Mark-up
TOTAL
Part E:
Travel Costs - See
Note S
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipmrnn Truck
$140.00/day
Mileage (over 00 miles, round tip)
$0.3 I/mile
Travel Timr
$40.00/hiour
Per Diem
580.00/day
Air Fart
ByNeed
TOTAL PART E
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS A-E
Notes;
1:
Please referno Appendix A, Part I for a breakdown ofpenonnel costs, lforoundwater Monitoring is recommended ana result ofa CAP - No Remediataon Syanein, the coal forthe workplan and
comm prcopoual will be included in tIme re,rsmbaruable roar foe that CAP.
2 Please refer to Appendix A, PartS for a breakdown ofequipmenr cones. Mark-up is allowed for subcona’acted items only arid receipts musl aoeompany the application for reimbumeinent,
3: Please refer to Appendix A, Part 7 for a breakdown ofwaste management coal,
-I:
Please refer no Appendix A, Pail 2 for additional laboratory analynea and costs. Mamt.up ia allowed only on aubcontacned ilema. Saanplin,g for inorganic components in groundwater can and should
be cciiiductS using field sensoru and meters An explanation for the use ofasa ssaalysscal laboratory to pcrfonn these teats must accompany the worlaplan and cost proposal.
5: Please refer no Appendix A, Psmt 4 (nra breakdown oftmavel policy asadconts. The ThRCC will reisnborae fora single TI so perfonn all purging and aampling duties, both in site rismne and navel
lime.
23
ACTIVITY 08: CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
PREPARATION
This subsection will bç used at sites where corrective action is necessary. •The CAP will fall into one
of two broad categones. The first category is a CAP that seeks to passively remediate the site by
means ofnatural attenuation, the effectiveness ofwhich will be confirmed by groundwater monitoring.
This CAP may be developed following either a Plan A or a Plan B risk assessment. The second
category is a CAP that recommends the installation ofa remediation system to activqly reduce the
contaminant levels to the point where closure following a program ofgroundwater monitoring can be
achieved, This CAP will be developed following the submission ofa Plan B risk assessment.
Please note that some,,portions of these CAPs may require the participation of a Registered
Professional Engineer. Please refer to 30 TAC §334.308 (g) (21) for information on when this
participation is necessary.
CORRECTiVE ACTION PLAN
- NO
REMEDiATION SYSTEM
PERSONNEL TYPE
RATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Sensor Engi,srer/Gtologiaa (P2)
59500
I
$9500
Project Mansgrr (PM)
$80.00
2
$160.00
SiaffEngooiserr/Geologisi (SF)
$70.00
4
$280.00
Word Peocettor (WI’)
$3500
I
$105.00
Project Manager-OM&P Plan
$8000
2
$16000
SuE Engoneer!Geologisi.OM&’P Plan
$70.00
4
$28000
Word Processor (WP)-OM&P Plan
$35.00
2
570.00
TOTAL
$1,150.00
CORRECTi\L ACTION PLAN
-
WITH REMEDIATION SYSTEM (See Notes)
PERSONNEL TYPE
RATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Principal Frogoroeer (Pin)
$110.00
4
$440.00
Assonant
Eneineer Pt)
$55.00
30
52,55000
P rotc
I
Nlsnsgev (PM)
$80.00
8
$640.00
StaftfngoneerGeologism (SF)
$70.00
24
$1,680.00
Dralkspe,scss 11(02)
$50.00
20
$1,000.00
Gird Processor (V/P)
535.00
0
$350.00
TOTAL
$6460.00
Nstes:
I: The haled costs include generation ofmapt sand design drawings (to wait).
They
do not include the $1 tS.00 available (orthe gesaeealionofthe wostptaes and coxtptopoaal to produce these plans.
2:
The lssned costs ace for a baseline CAP woOs the installation ofone rrmtdialion syslem (it., groundwaxee pump tc teat, dual-phase cxlmctiosx or soil vapor extacaion). isaslifacaaion shc,uld be
provided on the as urkplan and cosm proposal, based on sine-specific clstumamances and the reauli ofCAP leuang, for oat-of-scope costs, Requests for preapprovai wall tie reviewed on a case-by-case
basis
3: QuoneThid prrparsenon coats arc included in the CAP generation costs.
24
ACTIVITY 09: REMEDIATION SYSTEM
INSTALLATION
This subsection will be used to submit a wo&pIa~and cost proposal with either an Interim Corrective
Action Plan (ICAP) (see Activity 02) or Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (see Activity 08). Each of the
first four parts ofthe worksheet (Parts A1-A4) are constructed around one of four basic ~ystems: PSI-I
recovery, groundwater pump-and-treat, soil vapor extraction, and dual-phase extractl9n- Each of these
systems has a baseline of three recovery wells- Each ofthe,p,arts will have the option ofcombining
other systems and adding or subtracting recovery wells. I his will allow the development of an
installation and start-up cost that is relevant to the needs of your site. Only use the one of the first
four parts that is most appropriate to your site.
Because ofthe variable nature ofremediation systems, the TNRCC has not developed standardized
system costs, Each system will be constructed to meet site-specific remediation needs. The TNRCC
has supplied various equipment types and equipment posts in Appendix A, Section
5,
Equipment and
Supplies. This section may be reterred to when acquiring quotes foç costing out thq system designed
in the ICAP or CAP. Ifnecessary equipment differs from that contained in Appendix A, the preparer
should supply three quotes with the cost proposal. Ifthe tank owner/operator is in possession of
appropriate ~ndthnctional remediation equipment previously reimbursed by the ThRCC at another
site, that equipment should be reused. The cost effectiveness of the proposed rernediation system must
be supported by documentation such as comparative quotes and technical statistics.
Ifthe reniediation program designed in the CAP is pf short duration (9 months or kess), or if the use
of a capital component in the remediation system is expected to be of short duration, the option of
renting or leasing the remediation system or the individual component should be evaluated. Sufficient
quotes (at least three per option) for equipment lease/rental should be included with a cost-benefit
analysis in the installation cost proposal to allow a determination of the most cost effective option to
be made. When the reniediation program designed in the CAP is of intermediate length
(9
to 24
months), the option ofpurchasing an~leasing or leasing-to-own the remediation equipment should
be evaluated. Again,
sufficient quotes (at least three per evaluated option) for equipment
purchase/lease/Lease-to-own
should be included
with
a cosf-benefit analysis in the installation cost
proposal
to a!low a determination of the most cost effective option to be made. Ifthe remediation
program designed
in the CAP is planned to last in excess of two years, remediation equipment
purchase wiliThe
considered
the
most cost effective option. At least three quotes for equipment
purchase
should be ipcluded with the
installation
cost proposal.
The cost of
renteWleased/lea~ed-to-
own equipment will
be
reimbursed in
the preapproved costs
for
Operation, Monitoring, &
Performance
(see Activity
10).
The cost for purchased remediation systems will
be
reimbursed after
the successful completion of the installation and start-up of the system
in this Activity.
Please
note
that some portions
ofthe
installation
process may require the participation of a Registered
Professional Engineer.
Please refer to 30 TAt
§33430R (g) (21)
for information on
when
this
participation
is necessary.
WORKSHEET FOR REMEDIATiON SYSTEM INSTALLATiON AND START-UP
Pan Al: Consultant
Offace
and fleid Costs, PSU Recovery System
-
See Note I
Secuon I tnsiailaninn and Smantup offlanic 3-well Syaiem
iTE~l
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNiTS/HOURS
TOTAL
Senior Engineer lP2)
Project oversight
$95.00
I
$95.00
Associate Engineer (Pt)
Management. Regulatory intersebors, Field Oversight
$i5.00
7
$595.00
Sasfff;Gint ~SF)
held Preparation, insaallaaion ass6 Stsnup
570.00
20
$1,400.00
Technician Ill)?)
Field Preparation. installation and Stastup
$45.00
32
$1,440.00
25
P1-7
Seaasdard Exemption Poem
Preparationassd Submission
$195.00
ifRequired
FAR’
System installation
Pseparatson and Submission
$855.00
I
$855.00
Wodc$antnd Cost Proposal
Preparation and Submission
$115.00
I
$115.00
Total, Section I
Section 2: Add/Delete Wells (Any System) -
Per Well
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT
COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associate Engineer(PI)
Managemnesat. Regulatory Interaction
$85.00
I
$83.00
Stnff Engineer (SF)
Office Piaamning
$70.00
I
$70.00
StaffEngismeer
(SF)
Installation and Staesssp
$70.00
4
5280.00
Technscianil(T2)
Officerteparation
545.00
I
$45.00
Technician 11(12)
Inntaliation arid Startup
$45.00
8
$360.00
Smabtosal, Section 2
$840.00
N
of
Wells
to
AdMDelne
Total, Section 2
TOTAL, PART Al
Fan ~U: Consuitant Office and Field Costs Groundwater Pump-and-Treat System
- See
Note I
Section
I
Installation sand Startupof Basic 3-well System
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Senior Esgineen (P2)
Pno2ccs Oversight
595.00
3
5285.00
Associate Engineer (Pt)
Management, Regulatory Interaction, Field Oversight
$85.00
8
$680.00
.~ssSoc ate Enginrer (P I)
held Oversight
$8500
9
5765,00
Small Engineer (SF)
Office Harming
$70.00
4
$2g0.00
Small Engineer Sf)
lneiattseion and Startup
$70.00
20
$1,400.00
Technician 11)12)
Office Preparation
545.00
2
$90.00
Tec)ssicisr 11(12)
Installation and Startup
$4500
32
$1,440.00
Pt-’ Srsndamd Esempncsn Font
Preparetion and Submission
$195.00
ifReqnired
FAR-St strom tnsmatlsmion
Preparation and Submmssion
$2,300.00
I
$2,300.00
Wcmrkplan arid (‘cisc Proposal
Prepartuon and Submission
$11500
I
$115.00
Total,
Section I
Sec tion2 Add Soil Vapor Exnacnsoms (SVE) System (3.weil)
TENt
ACTIVITY
UNITCOST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Senior Engineer (Pt)
Pso)ect Oversight
$9500
I
595.00
A ssociate Engineer (Pt)
Management, Regulatory lnmeractaon
$85.00
2
$170.00
Associate Engincer)Pl)
Field Oversight
$85.00
2
5170,00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office Plaivsing
$70.00
2
$140.00
26
Staff Engineer (SF)
Inalaltation and Startup
$70.00
8
$560.00
Technician 11(12)
Office Pstparation
$45.00
2
590.00
Technician 11(12)
Installation and Startup
$45.00
1?
$720.00
Total,
Sectioa 2
$1,915.00
Section 3~Add Off-gas Treaunrnt System
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associate Engineer (P1)
Manageanent. Regualatoey Interaction
585.00
2
$170.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office
Planning
$70.00
I
$70.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
installation stud Staetutp
$70.00
6
$420.00
Technician 11(12)
Office Preparation
$45.00
I
$45.00
Technician II (T2)
Installation and Staeiup
545.00
12
$540 00
Total, Section 3
$1,145.00
Section
4. Add/Delete Wells
(Any System)
-
Per Well
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associate Engineer (Pt)
Management. Regulatory Inletaction
$85.00
I
$85.00
Start’ Engineer (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
I
$70.00
Staff Engtnees (SF)
installation and Smietup
570,00
4
.
$280.00
Technician Ii (12)
Office Preparation
$45.00
I
$45.00
Trchnicrsn 11(12)
lnatallation and Startup
$45.00
8
$360.00
Subtotal, Sectioa 4
$840.00
N
of Wells to
AddutIelttt
Total, Section 4
TOTAL PART
Al
Part .3: (‘umsualtant Office and Field Costs, SVE System
- See
Note I
Sec non I tnsistlsmion and Stan-up of Basic 3-well System
.
ITEM
ACTIVITY
IJNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Senior Engineer (P2)
Project Oversight
$95.00
3
5285.00
Associsme Engineer (Pt)
Managemnenl. Regulatory Interaction
$85.00
8
$680.00
.Asuncistc Engineer (P1)
Field Oversight
$85.00
9
$765.00
Staff t’ngineen (SF)
Office Planating
$70.00
4
$280.00
SlaftFmrgmnetr SF)
installation and Startup
$70.00
8
$560.00
Tcchnicasn 11(11)
Office Preparations
$45.00
2
$90.00
Technician 11(12)
Installation and Startup
545.00
20
$900.00
P1-7 Standard E.sernpnon Form
Preparation and
Subnisaion
$195.00
itRequired
PAR- Ssttcni installation
Pccpantion stud Sssbmitsiosu
$2300.00
I
$2,300.00
Wortiptan and Cost Proposal
Preparation and Submitsion
5115.00
I
5115.00
27
Total, Section I
System
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Management, Regulatory Interaction
$85.00
2
$170.00
Office Planas’mg
$70.00
I
$70.00
Installation and Startup
$70.00
6
5420.00
Office Prepanalion
$45.00
I
$45.00
Installation arid Startup
545.00
12
$540.00
Total, Section 2
51,245.00
Well
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/IOURS
TOTAL
Managennent, Regsslatouy interaction
585.00
I
$85.00
Office Planning
$70.00
I
$70.00
Installation and Startup
$70.00
4
$280.00
Office Pmepaestaon
$45.00
I
$45.00
Installation and Startup
545.00
8
$360.00
Subtotal, SectionS
5840.00
N ofWeII. to
Add/Delete
lbuai,
Section
3
TOTAL PARTA3
Field Costs, Dual Extraction System
-
See Note I
ofBasic 3-well System
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Project O-ecrsighs
595.00
3
$285.00
Management, Regulatory Inneeaction
$85.00
8
5680.00
Field Oversight
$85.00
13
$1,105.00
Office Plaauiing
570.00
4
5280.00
Installation and Seariup
$70.00
24
$1,680.00
0111cc Preparation
$4500
4
$180.00
Technician II (T2)
Installation and Slautup
545.00
40
$1,800.00
P1-7 Standard Esempiton Form
Preparation and Submission
$195.00
IfRrquized
28
FAR-
System Installation
Preparation and Submission
$2,300.00
I
$2,300.00
Wortcplan and Coat Propoaal
Preparation and Stibmiation
5115.00
Total,
Section I
$~5,00
Section 2: Add Off-gasTreainnent System
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Aanociaie Engineer(PI)
Management, Regulaeovy Interaction
$85.00
2
$110.00
Suaff Engineer (SF)
OIIsce Planning
$70.00
t
$70.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Installation and Startup
570.00
6
5420.00
‘Technician It (T2)
Office Preparation
545.00
I
$45.00
Technician II (T2)
Inatallation and Ssanup
545.00
12
$540.00
Total, Section 2
51,245.00
Section
3:
Add/Delete Wells - Per Well
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associate Engineer (P1)
Managennene, Regulatory lnrceacnion
$85.00
I
$85.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
I
$70.00
StaffEngincer (SF)
Installation and Startup
$70.00
4
$280.00
Technician 11(11)
Office Preparation
$45.00
I
545,00
Technacisas 11)12)
Installation and Startup
$45.00
8
$360.00
Subtotal, SectionS
$140.00
$ of Welta to
Add/Delete
.
Total, Section 3
TOTAL, PART
A4
Part
B: Capital Equipment Costs
-
See Note 2
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Ate Compressor
Au SthppingTowcn
Catal)tc Utilizer
Cunucil Panel
Oil,’Waler Separator
.
Pneumatic Pump
Etecuic Dossnho)c Pumps
Regenerative Blousers
.
Holding Tanks
Carbon Polishing Units
(Otlsce)
(Other)
29
(Other)
Ssabsotal, Part B
15
Mark-sap
TOTAL, PARTY
Part C: Installation Costs
-
See Note 3
ITEM
ACTIVItY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Trenchirsg
Sawcut and exnavate 0-ench lines
15.00/IS
Plumbing
Install Piping (Air, Water, Electhc) in trenches
I5.0O’LF
Resurface Excavations
Recover trench linea
$6,00&F
.
Wellhead
Modification
Install wellhead
accesa boxes
Al Coat
Welt
Elccthcs
lostalt switches & drop other
5200.00/Well
Well Plumbing
Install air/water tubing tc pumps
$200.OOAVell
Concrete stab
Install slab for rcnnediation system
$5.50/SqFt
Remediasron compound fence
Install protective fence around syssern
$850.00
I
$850.00
Small Itema
$20.00/Sile/Day
Miscellaneous
Fittings, locks,
etc.
$100.00
I
$10000
(Other)
(Olhne)
(Other)
Subtotal, Part C
15 Mark-up
TOTAL, PART C
Part I): ~‘asle Slanagement Costs— See Note 4
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNIT/HOURS
TOTAL
Load tail Han E’icavaicd Soils and Concrete
$ 14.00/CY
Dispose E’icavated Soils and Concrete
$10.25/CY
.
Vacuum Tmck
$75.00/HR
Dispose Flails
$0.40/Gal
Subchapter H Discharge or Alternative Disposal Method (Describe in Work
Plan)
As
Needed
Subtotal. Pan D
10
Mark-sap
TOTAL. PART U
Part F: System Performance Analytical Costs- See Notes
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
30
TPFI (Waler)
549.00
STEX (Water)
$62.50
BTEX (Air)
562.50
BTEX w/ MTBE(Water)
$85.00
TOTAL LEAD (Waler)
531.00
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
(OTItER)
(OTHER)
Subtotal. Part £
10 Mark-up
TOTAL PART £
Part
F:
Travel
Costs- See Note 6
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Truck
$140.00/day
Mileage (over tOO miles,
round
thp)
$0.3
I/mile
Travel Time
$11 5.Oo4sour
Pee Diem
580.OOfday/penon
Air Fare
By Need
TOTAL. PART F
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS Al, A2, A3, or A4 and
13-F
I Please refer to Appendix A, Part I foe a breakdoss’n of personnel cotta.
3: Equipmenr purchased for the maiallauon ofa renedaaaion system will he costed out by 000te by the RcAS in the Interim Corrective Action Plan (ICAP)(see Activity 02), the Corrective Action
Plan
(CAP~(sccActsv,ty OS). or the workptan axis) cost proposal subnsioed for
Remedsal
Syttem’Instsllauos (see Activity 09). These gooses must be included when these documents are
submined so
the
TNI(( t. Hecauue ofthe uaai~urnature ofc,ch individual site, and the range ofequipmerit types available as the indunby, the RCAS should design tIre remedaation system with both effIciency and
cost in maid The cost
proposalu for rcmedistnon systems wtll be reviewed one etse-by-case basis.
3:
\tark-up is atoned (or subcontracted items only and rental or purchnae receipta muM accompany
the
application foe reimbursement
4: Please eef,~no Appenidi, A. Part 7 fur a breakdown of waste management costs.
5: Please refer to Appendix A.
Pan
2 for additional laboratory analyses and costs. Mark-up is allowed only on subcontracted
items,
6: Please refer to Appendix A. Pan 4 for a breakdown ofinsel policy and costs. Travel tune for this section incladea meal cones for a ewo-maas crew contistiergofa StaffEngiareer and a
Technician
31
ACTIVITY 10: OPERATION MONITORING, &
PERFORMAr1CE
This subsection will be used at sites after the installation and successfiil start-up of the remediation
system- Please note that this subsection allows both Groundwater Monitoring and Operation and
Maintenance to be submitted as a single activity at sites with an operating remediation system. This
subsection shou!d also be used for the costs for a rented/leased remediation system or any
rented/leased capital component(s) of the remediation system. If the rental/lease agreement contains
costs for the maintenance of systems or components, duplicate costs for the maintenance of those
systems/components are not reimbursable.
Rental/lease
agreements must be included with the
workplan and cost,,proposal submitted for this Activity to be considered for preapproval. The timing
ofthe annual OM&P cycle at a site will depend on the date of successfUl start-up of the remediation
system installed in Activity 09.
Please note that some portions of the OM&P_process may require the participation of a Registered
Professiopal Engineer. Please refer to 30 I AC §334308(g)(21) for information on when this
participation is necessary.
WORKSHEET FOR OPERATION, MONITORING, AND PERFORMANCE
1
Part A: Personnel Costs
-
See Note I
Secuon I. Fixed Annual Office Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
OMP Plan fur Existang Syulemt- See Note 2
Preparation and Siabminal
$500.00
I
Pnncipal Legiecer I
P3)
Oversight, Regulaiory Interaction
$110.00
4
5440,00
Project Manager (PM)
Managennens. Planning. Data Review
~0.O0
12
5960.00
OMA P Rcpsiri
Preparation and Submission
51.29500
I
$1295.00
Workplsr acts) Cost Proposal
Pmpaea?onandSssbmtusion
Si 1500
I
5115.00
Total,
Sectioa I
Sec s.c
1
ciiiarciiv NI
onimseriri
g I’eruonnrel Costs
Soh sec nor 2,”, First Qsarrce
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Sraffhrnixtrieer (ieolugcsi SF1
Field Peep, Data Fonnaering
$70.00
I
$70.00
Technic’ an lIt (‘13 i
Purge and Sample Wells. First 25
$40.00/Well
Techniciae Ill (T3)
Purge and Sample Wella. Each Addntoaal 25 (Max 75)
$10.00/Additional 25’At/ell
Total, Subsection 2A
Ssbsection 2B Second Quarter
32
ITEM
ACTI’nTY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
StaffEngiirrerlGeologist (SF)
Field Prep, Data Fonaratting
570,00
I
$70.00
Technician Ill (T3)
Purge and Sample Wells, First 25’
$40.00/Well
Technician III (13)
Paargr and Sample Wells. Each Additional 25’ (Max 75’)
$tO.0o/Additiostai 25i’Wtll
Total, Subsection 28
(
Snabsectoit 2C: Third Quartet
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
SeaffEngineer/Geologiat (SF)
Field Prep, Data Fonssatting
$70.00
I
$7000
Technician ill (T3)
Puaegt and Sample Wells. First 25’
540.00/Well
Technician III (13)
Purge and Sample Wells. Each Additional 25 (Max 75’)
$10.00/Additional 25’sWeII
Total, Subsection 2C
Subsection 20: Fcsumtla Quarter
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Staff Engineer/Geologist (SF)
Field Prep, Data Foeunateing
$70.00
I
$7000
Technician Ill 1T3)
Purge and Sannple Wells. First 25’
$40.00/Well
Technician III 13)
Purge and Samplrwella. Each Additional 25 (Max 75’)
SIO,00/Addiaionsi25’iWell
Total, Subsection 20
Total, Sectioen 2
Sec icon
i
Operation amid istoeitoring Personnel Coats for she Remnediation System. Per Site Visit
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Teclmi, ‘clan Ill (131
0dM, 1st System, L’p Ta 3 Welts
$75.00
I
$75.00
Tech riciare 11(1131
O&M. Air Emissionu Conbol
.
$25.00 Each Devace
Technician Ill (‘131
0dM, Each Additional Systems, UpTo 3 WrIts
$37.50
Technician III (13)
O&M. Each Additional Welt Per System Over 3. All Systems
$12 50/Well
Stall’ C egmneer SFi
Field
Prep,
Data Fonnamng
$70.00
.5
$35.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Field Peep, Data Fornratling. Each Additional
3
System Welts
$70.00
.5
$35.00
Subtotal. Section 3
N
aimbar of Site Vials,
Total, Seetlea.
3
TOTAL, PART
A
Part B: Equipment (o.sts’ See Note)
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
System ‘Coreiponene Rental Lease Casts . See Note 4
Disposable bailer,
$g.00,WeII
Small tents fcsr C,rs,undwater Sloniionng
$20.00/Event
4
$8000
Caatoms Canistern. includen installation, recycling, and/or disposal
$750.00
33
Electaical Service
2
Natural Gas Service
12
WaterAWaatewater Service
12
Telrcommussicatiorsa
(foe
oil-sift system moniton,ng)
12
(OTher)
(Other)
Small
items for System Maintenance
$50.00/)4onth/Syttcmn
12
Subtotal, Part BI
10 or 15 Mark-up
TOTAL, PART S
Part C: Analylical Costs
- See
Note 3
Section I. Groundwater Testing
ANALYTICAL TEST
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
TPHJDTEX
$111.50
TPHIBTEXw/MT8E
‘
$134.00
lOS
$15.00
PAH (610)
$158.00
POSH ($270)
$249.00
Slmnppimmg
$5.00/Sample
(OTHER)
Subtotal, Section 1
10 Mark-up
Total. Section 1
S ecslsis 2 System
I’erfonramcc e Analytical Testing
ANALYTICAL TEST
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
TPH (Water)
$49.00
BTEX (Water, Air)
.
$62.50
BTEX w~SlIDE (Wamee)
sgs.oo
TOTAL LEAD (Water)
$3100
Shipping
.
$5 00/Sample
(OTHER)
(OIlIER)
Subtotal, Section 2
10
Mark.op
Total, Section 2
TOTAL, FART C
34
Part Dt Waste Management Costs
-
See Note
5
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuum Tnick
$75.00/Hour
Fisaid Disposal
$0.40/Geltost
Subchapter H Diachaige or Alternate Dinposal Method (Descnbc in Wort Plan.)
As Needed
Subtotal
10
Mark-up
TOTAL,
FART
0
Part
E: Travel
Costs - Sec
Note
6
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/ HOURS
TOTAL
Eqampmeat Tnack
$140.00/day
Mileage (over 00 mites, round thp)
$0.3 I/mile
Travel Tame
$50.Oo4aoue
Per Diem
$80.00/day
Air Fare
my Need
TOTAL, PART E
TOTAL ACT!YKTY COSTS, PARTS A-E
Noun:
I Please refer to Appendix A. Part I foes breakdowns ofperaoanuel costs.
2: An 0511’ Plan for existing nyunemu should be submined for any nile where
t
remediation system was in operation at the time the system perfomnance eepotdng requirennnenes were adopted by tine TNRCC.
3: Please refer no Appendis A, PartS Ions listing ofequmpmcnt costs. Mart-up for aubconiractedcoats vnay. Refer to Appendix k Pail 9.
4 This line as ill be used fa remediation syuten, or a component(s) ofthc remrdiaaion will be reimbursed in this Activity. See Actitity 09~Remediation System Installaboin
5: Plcasere fer io Appendtx A, Pan 2 foe additional laboratory analyses and coats. Mails-np is allowed only on subconuscted items.
6: Please refer to Appendix A, Pan? for a breakdown ofwante management costs.
7: Please refer no Appendix A, Part 4 for a breakdown ofiravel policy and coors. The TNRCC wiIl,pay fr one Teclummeian to travel to the site and perfotmn 0dM and GroiandwaterSaammpling events. The
fl RC( will reinibarur this individual at the T3 mit when 0dM is perfornned and at the TI rate when tempting ii pcrformned. Travel will be paid at the T3 rate.
35
ACTIVITY 11: SITE CLOSURE
This subsection will be used after a Site Closure Request has been reviewed and
approved by the
TNRCC.
WORKSHEET
FOR SITE CLOSURE
Part
A: Personnel Costs -
See Note
I
Section 1: Office Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURSiUNITS
TOTAL
Site Closure Request
PeepaeslionatsdSubtstissiott
$275.00
I
$275.00
Prc’jecr Manager (PM)
Management and Overnight
$80.00
2
$160.00
Final Clouttee Repon
Preparation and Submission
$195.00
I
$19500
Woriaplan sand Cons Pnoponal
?ttpambesn and Submission
$115.00
I
$115.00
Totat
Sectioo I
$74500
2: Field Personnel (‘oils
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
Technician II
(12)
Plug First Welt
$135.00
Technician lttl’2)
Plug Additional Well, 100’ Deep
$90.00
Technician 11)12)
Plug Additional Well, 100’ Deep
$135.00
Remediason System Removal’ See Note 2
Remove arid dispooe ofsyitrm capiral components
$500.00
Toaal, Secainn
I
TOTAL,
Part B: Rig Costs
-
See Note 3
.
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Mobilization Ilens han Si) rnalcs)
Transpon Rig & Crew to Site
$245.00
I
$245.00
Mileatee (oven 50, max 450)
Additional Mileage to Site, Round Trip
$2.50
Plug & Abandon Welts
P&A first 25’, per well
$300.00
Plue ansi ,\bandon Wells
P&A additional footage, 26’ no 100’, per foot per well
$8.00
Plug and Abandon Wells
MA additions) 100/age, lDtr, per foot perwell
$10.00
DnlI Cress Per Diem
Overnight Stay
$190.00
Subtotal, Part
B
15 Mark-up
TOTAL, PART B
36
Part C: Other
Costs -
See Note
3
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Disposal otwasle Material
5250,00• 5I0.S0)CY
Small Items
$20.OoeSite/Day
(Onttee)
(Other)
(Other)
Sublot.l, Pars C
15 Mitts-up
TOTAL PART C
Part
I): Travel Costs
-
See Note 4
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Tnick
$140.00/Day
Mileage (over 100, Round trip)
$0.3
Travel Time
$45.00
Per Diem
$80.00
Airfare
By Need
I
TOTAL PART D
TOTAL
ACTIVITY
COSTS, PARTS A-D
Notes:
1:
Plesse refer ro Appendix A, Pan I for a breakdown of personnel cotta.
2:
Capital equLpmesl coosibrs of the major individual cotnponensa of the eettnediation system includingpumps, compressors. aeration ways, aleipping towers, oil/water separators, atox units, etc. It dots not
include wiflng lahing piping. dc Every elton uhould be made to reuse funcnonal components ofa remediatton nyatem at other sites to control coats.
3: Ntaek.udcn is slIms ed for subcontracted costs onsiy. Costs for ptuggtnig and abandoning welln includen resurfacing
the
well pomts. Waite material includes well casing, concrete, surfacecompletions,
compoiin Iencmg, etc.
4: Please refer to Appendix A. Past 4 foe a breakdown ofteavel policy and costs.
37
APPENDIX A
REIMBURSABLE UNIT COSTS
38
PART 1: PROFESSIONAL
PERSONNEL/LABOR RATES
PERSONNEL TITLE
MAXIMUM RATE/HOUR
Principal
(PR)
.
$110.00
Principal Engineer/Geologistilydrogeologist
III (P3)
$110.00
Senior
Engineer(Geologist/Uydmgeologist 11 (P2)
$95.00
Associate Engineer/Geologist/Flydrogeologist 1 (P1)
$85.00
Project Manager (PM)
$80.00
StatTEngineer/Geologist/Flydmgeologist
(SF)
$70.00
Field
Engineer/Geologist/Flydrogeologist
(ED)
$65.00
Environmental Scientist (ES)
$70.00
Health Scientist
(US)
$80.00
Technician ill (T3)
$50.00
Technician II (T2)
$45.00
Technician I (TI)
$40.00
Draftsperson 11(02)
$50.00
Dralt.sperson I (Dl)
$45.00
Word Processor (WI’)
$35.00
Clerical (Cl.)
$30.00
Notes:
1: The
Penootutel Titles
in this table
correspond
with the
Personnel Qualifications and Task Descriptions in
the table
immediately following.
2:
Personnel Costs
for office
staff includgs the cost
of
the equipment they normally use to complete their tasks. Separate costs for computers (including CADI)
machines) oUnce suppites. etc. arc not
retrnbursable.
3:
Reinnhuniensent is based on the maximum rate of the corrective action task being performed, not the rate of the individual performing thç task.
For
instance,
ian indi’tdual
at
the level of a Techn;csan I ç.Tt)
or hçgjier is
reqsnrcd to peetorm normal mon’tonng well sampling acttvtttes,
but
there
ts no injunction
against
a
Sentor Eneincer (P2) perlonnlng tbts task. I he maxImum reimbursable rate
for
thts task, regardless
of
who
as actually
perfom~mgthe work, however,
is at the
rate sI a ii. whtch
ts
~4U,00/
hour.
(In other
words,
any individual with minimum
qualificationsorhIgherrnay
perform a
gIven
conecttve action task, but
csnihunetwrn wtll be
based
on
the
hourly or unit rate
tor the task, not the
pay
rate
of
the sndtvtdual
perlorming
it,)
4:
Mark-up lbr prafessional personnel employed by the RçAS is not allowed. If the RCAS does
not have
an
individual
with
the
qualifications necessaiy to
p.irtonu
a task the RUAS may
subcontract out for
thIs
service, Re,mbua-sable
costs
for
these
IndivIduals
will
be cost plus (00/n,
39
PERSONNEL
QUALIFICATIONS
AND
TASK DESCRWTIONS
The following Qualifications and task descriptions are for those personnel who will be involved in
activities for which preapproval IS required.
PERSONNEL AND QUALIFICATIONS
TASK DESCRIPTION
Principal
(PR)
.
.
.
Administrative andlor professional head of the organization Responsible for conceivin and executing plans and
functions of the organization. Directs the professional stall’. Normally has a rinanctal in~erestin the company as
partial owner, major.investor or major stockholder. Charges an extremely limited number of hours per site as the
Principal. This position should never bill field hours.
-
Expert testimony
- Legal strategies
- Depositions
- Organizattonal oversight
Principal EnginetrfGeologistlftydrogtolo ist III (P3)
A Principal must oc professionalty regtstereäwhen appitcable, be in compliance with Subchapter J rules, have
an advanced enganeering or science degree and at least len years expenence in conductit~gcorrective ~ction.
Administrative and/or professional
heaa
ot’an organization with authprity and resvonsibinity for conceiving and
executing plans and functions of ti)e
org,anization and directing
a pronessional staff Charges a very
limitea
number ofhours
per site, as in review oi the
project documents,
A
Principal should almost
never bill field work.
- Expert testimony
- Program management
-Project çiverssgnt
- Deppsittons
- Reviews most complex sues
- Develops or advances new
technology innovations
Senior Engincer/Geologisl/llydrogeologis,t II (P2)
Typically requires an advanced degree. Requtres protessional registration when applicable, S years ofexperience
in technical or mann enal roles, and compliance with Subchapter). Serves as senior technical leader for
environmental remeä~ationprojects of medium to large scope and/or complexity and has developed substantial
expertise in the field ofpractice May supervise or direct the work activities of rower level professionals and
technicians. Will perform very lim)ted field work, and have, limited involvement in projects Duties typically
include reviewing reports, developtn~strategies, and attending client and/pr Agency meetings. Responsi~slefor
approving designs, reports, plans, ana specitications before supmtttal to clients or regulatory agencies. It
significantly involvea in a nighly technical project, should have substantial technicat expertise directly related to
the peoject.
- Program
management
‘Projectovetstgitt
- Ptojçgt managemcnt
- Aquiter tharactenzation
- Reviews technical reports
- Reviews RAPs
- Data review and analysis
- Prepares proposals
Associate Engineer!Geologistillydrogeologist I (Pt)
Typically requires a Bachelor,j degree in engjneenng geology hydrogeology, or related science and professional
registration when applicable, complies with aubchapfer .1, ana’has S to’? years of experience or an advanced
degree and more than 4 years ofexperience. Leads and supervises teams oflower level personnel but would have
a limited number of hours charged to each site, and only a small percentage of total field hours. C)enerally
supervises Project Managers and oversees sevem~ropcts.May prepare proposals. Under general direction,
prepares environmental programs and plans specirica ions for site remediation activity.
- Project management
. Engineering/remedial equipment design
- Aquifer characterization
‘Review technical reports
- Review remedial action plans
- Data review & analysis
- Report preparation
- Prepare proposals
- Site inspection (occasional)
Projecl Manager (PM)
Typically possesses a bachelorofscience degree in en ineering, oeology hydrogeology, or a directly related field
Serves as manager for entire projects. Compties with ~
ano n~sat least three years ofexperience in the
environmental field Under generat supervision, prepares environmental programs and pfans specifications for site
remedtal activities Is responsible br gathering held data and is competent at data analysis. Serves as on-site
technical expert and may do hydrological site charactenrations, supervIse hydraulic tests, and write sections of
reports
- Proiect management
- Data review and analysis
- Report preparation
-
Report review
-
Engineering/equipment design
- On-site supervision
- Workplan preparation
-Site assessment planning
-
Field work planning
- Site inspection (periodic
access
-Obtains permission for o
Staff Engineer/C,eolooist/ltvdrogeologist (SF)
Requires a bachelor’s dagree in engineerin~,geology, lwdrogeology, or related science and one to three years of
experience in the environmental field Works under supervision to perform routine tasks related to environmental
remediatson system design and aquifer testing Must be able to conduct assessment and remedial activities
including drilling and monitorini- well instalration sampling, and compilino data. Must have knowledge of
QA’QC procedures and protocor This position will normaliy be highest inThe number ofhours billed to field
work.
-
Report preparation
-
Field work preparatio&planning
- Supervises site assessment activities and overexcavation
- Site reconnaissance and mapping
- Remedial system installation
- Limited data review and analysis
- Obtains permission
for
off-site access
- Monitoring activities
Environmental Scientist (ES),
Typically requires a degree in biology chemistry, microbiology, or related environmental science degree and 2-6
years ofretated experience. An indivtduat with an advanced aegree should have 2 years of related experience
rerforms assignments related
to site
assessments
and
bioremediation projects, risk
analysis
methodologies, and
analytical data reducunn
- Data review and analysis
- Bioremediation feasibility studies
- Report preparation and
overview
-
Report review
- Dnsite super’visiop
- Site assessment plannmg
Health
Scientist IllS)
Typically requires a degree in lndustnal Hygiene. Toxicology, or a related health science degree and requires 1-3
‘ears ofrelated experience Ensures compliance with ofUcla service operations with OSHA safeiy standards.
Addresses public health concems
- Health and safety coordinator
- Develops site safety plan
- Periodically oversees health and safety monitoring
Field Engineer/Geologist/llvdrogeologist
(FD)
Entr.’ levet position requiring it degree In engineenng, geology hvdrogeolo,gy, or related science and less than a
year of experience. Underclose supervision perfonns routine t’iefd tasks reiated to environmental projects
including drilling and monitoring well installation, sampling, site layout and geologic mapping, wrtting field
notes. and basic analysis
- Field work preparation
-Assist an site assessment activities
- Site reconnaissance & mapping
- Remedial system installation
-Limited data review aod analysis
- Monitoring and saanphng
- Supervise overexcavation
40
Technician
lllfr3
.
.
‘
.
‘
‘
Typically requires a high school diploma, certified or licensed trades-person, or an Associates degree. Requires
more than 4 yeaa’~ofexperience in the environwental field. Respon~tble,for, general stapelvasion or the installation,
maintenance, and repair ofon-sate equipment. Collects samples anti maintains operating logs.
-Fieldwork,preparation
- Operation & maintenance of equipment
- Wcll development & sampling
- Soil Samplan,g
-
Waste handling
- Remedial system installation
- Ltmsted contlactor supervisson
- Free product (PSH) removal
-
Monitoring
Technician ll,(T2) .
.
.
,
. .
,
Typically requires a high
school diploma. Requires 2 to 4
years of on-the-job tra~nang.Under appropnate
supervision, performs routine labor tasks a~sociate4with on-sat; installation, maintenance, and repair of
remediation equipment. Bails wells and collects soil and groundwater samples.
- Field work.preparauon
- Operation &
maintenance of
equipment
- Wcll development & sampling
- Soil Samplin,g
- Waste handling
- PSH removal
- Monatorang
Technician I
(TI)
,
.
. .
.
.
.
Typically requtres a hig~ischool diploma. Entry level position under close supervision. Performs, routine labor
associated with system installation, maintenance and repair of’machinery, monitoring, and sampling.
- Opera;ion and maintenance Q.fequipment
- wçli devetopmetst and sampling
- S2il sampling
- PSI’! removal
- Monitonng
~raftsptrson(t(DZ)
.
.
.
rypicairy requires a nigh school digloma. Requires 4 to 8 years of expenence or two years ofrelated college
and
more than one,year
ofexperience. (,enerally~requires
aTeçhnical Os-awing Certificate, and adyanced drafting
skills such as Computer Aided Drafting (& Design) operations.
- Adva~iceddtsfting
- CAD/CADD work
- Cartography
Draftsperson I
(Eu)
.
.
.
.
Typically reqyires a high school diploma
w!th o~pto
4 years ofe~periqnce.Generally requires a Technical ,
Drawing Certificate and ~omefamiliarity with Computer Aided Drafting. Performs entry
to
mid-level drafting
such as minor edits to existing CAD or board drawings.
- Mid-level drafting
- CAD editing
Word Processor (WP)
.
. .
.
.
Operates computer for word processing, s.preadsheets, and statistical typing, correspondence report generation, etc
Higher billing rates imply experienced~eflicientwork.
- Spreadsheets
- Report generataon
- Word processing
Clerical (CL)
.
.
- Typing
tjeneral omlice work, typing, and filing.
- flUng
- General secretarial
-
Document reproduction
PART 2: LABORATORY ANALYSIS costs
TestJMethod
Standard
Rush
Rate
‘
Rate
Test/Method
Standard
Rush
Rate
Rate
41
TPH- EPA 4iL1
Soil
Watmr
Air
BTE- EPA $0218
Soii
Watrr
Air
SEX
wi
MTaE- EPA 80218
Soil
Water
PA H
Soil -
EPA
SiOO
Water-EPA
610
PA H
Soil
-
EPA Silo
Water
- EPA 625/8270
Totsi Diuolved Solids-
EPA 160.1
Water
$7125
S73.50
$71.25
$93.75
$93.75
$93.75
$120.00
$127.50
$222.00
$237.00
$333.00
$373.50
$150.00
RCRA
Metals- EPA 1l31
Soil
Totai Oraaitiz Hsioaens- TOX
EPA 9020
Soil
Volatile Omaanie Compounds- VOCa
EPA 8260W
Soil.
Water
Senii-V.O.C,i- EPA 8270
Soil
Water
TCLP
Benzciie- EPA 1311
wI
8020
Soil
$47.50
$49.00
$47.50
$62.50
$62.50
$62.50
580.00
$85.00
$148.00
$
i
38,00
$222.00
$249.00
$15.00
$300.00
$40.00
$32.00
$18.00
n/s
$98.00
$147.00
Soil
Pamameteri- (in Note 2)
Total Organic Carbon
Soil - 5w7060
Water-EPA 4t1.tItoSO
Chlorides- EPA 325.3
Soil/Water
Moiatisre’ ASTM 0-2256
Soil
Suirates- EPA 375.4
Watrr
$220.00
$220.00
$295.00
$295.00
$152.00
Tatal Lad- EPA 7420
Soil
Water
$330.00
$330.00
$570.00
$570.00
rLIa
T~PLead- EPA t3ii w/ 7410
$2250
Soil
ida
$60.00
$46.00
$27.00
Reactivity,
Corrosivity, Ignitability (Rcl)
Soil
Notes:
Iron (Fe)-EPA 20&7
Water
$12.00
$24.00
Niiralea- EPA 353.1
water
$1600
$36.00
Phoapliatea. EPA 365.2
Watt?
$31.00
$31.00
$93.00
$35.00
$10.00
$24.00
$24.00
$1650.00/day
$46.50
$46.50
n/a
ida
$13.00
$36.00
$36.00
Mobile Laboratory
I:
The above prices include all charges associated with lab analysis including but not limited to preparation and disposal.
2: Includes Total Organic Carbon, Porosity, Intrinsic Permeability, Bulk Density, and Volumetric Water Content.
3: Justification for anything other than the Standard Rate should be included in the work plan and/or the reimbursement application. The Standard Rate is for a turnaround mime
greater than 48 hours Rush Rate is for a turnaround time of less than 4?hours. If an analytical test cannot be completed In less than 48 hours, Rush Rate will not be allowed.
4: Allowable shipping cosss are $5.00 per sample container (or sample set in the case ofBTEX)V.O.C. samples), regardless of the method ofdeliveiy. Labor for the
collection
samples is included in site personnel costs.
5: A mobile laboratory is expected to conduct 18-20 TPH/BTEX analyses on soils each day or IS-IS TPH/BTEX water/soil analyses each day. For sites where a small
numbel
ofsamples will need to be analyzed, the TNRcC may allow ¼~fonedayofuse forihe mobile laboratoi’y
(at $823.00,) if this
is the most cost-effective option. Mob/Demob costs
for a mobile lab are $14.00 tom the first
50
miles (or less) plus SI .90/mile for each addiironal mile up to a total of4SO additional miles.
6. Method 80213 replaces Method 8020. Method 8260B replaces Method 8240.
42
PART 3: DRILLING WELL INSTALLATION, AND
DIRECT pusi-! TECHNOLOGY COSTS
The followingcosts are
for
various drilling activities. Please note that the costs are set
up
so that any
bormg or
monitonng well
that is twenty-five deep or less will be reimbursed at a lump sum rate. Costs
after the first twenty-five feet should be calculated on a per-foot (beyond twenty-five feet) basis.
Bonng costs include decon, coring, plugging, and Water Well Rçport
generation costs.
Monitoring
well mstallation costs include dnlhng, decon, coring, all well materials, surface completion, cap, lock,
and Water Well Report Generation.
SECTION A: CONVENTIONAL DRILLING
-
See Notes
SandISiItJClay with Hollow-Stem Augers and Continuous Sampling
Depth Interval
Boring
2” Welt
4” Well
6” Well
Lwnp
Sian
Ltanp Sam
LunpSimi
Lump Sian
0
to 25’
$775.00
$1,025.00
$1187.50
Ss,915.00
Per
Additional Foot
Per Additional Foot
Per Additional Foot
Per Additional
Foot
26’
to 50
$25.00
$43.50
$54.00
$76.00
Si to 100’
$4300
$51.50
$61.50
$76.00
00’
$61.50
$54.00
$80.00
$88.00
Limestone/Hard Rock using Air or Mud Rotary, Surface Sampling Only
Depth Interval
Boring
2” Well
4” Well
6” Well
LunipSun,
LwnpSurn
LwsipSimi
LumpSwn
0’ to 21
$1,025 00
$1,275.00
$1,450.00
$1,950.00
Per Additional
Foot
Per
Additional Foot
PerAdditional
Foot
Per Additional Foot
26~
to
S~
$4200
$46.00
$59.00
$78.00
Si’
io
100’
$48.00
$5300
$62.00
$79.00
lOll
$61.00
$63.00
$70.00
$89.00
Limestone/Hard Rock using Air Coring and Continuous Sampling
Depth Interval
Boring
2” Well
4” Well
6” Well
Lump
Sorts
LurnpSuns
LiampSuns
Lump Suns
O’to 1~
$1,071.00
$1562.50
$1,125.00
$2,073.00
Per Additional Fool
Per Additional Foot
Per Addimional
Fool
PAdditial Foot
26’ to 5O~
$38.50
$57.50
$72.00
$87.50
Si’ to 100’
$44.00
$65.00
$7900
$96.00
‘100’
.
$53.00
$76.00
$92.00
$118.00
Completion Footage Rates Expected in a Standard ($0-Hour) Work Day
43
Borings
Monitoring WeUs
Sao~Siit’Clayuting EISA,, Continuous Sampling
.
143
III
Limestone4’taed Rock w/
Air/Mud
Rolazy,
Surface Sampling
215
117
Linstssoov/Ilard Rock
miMi
Cooing, Continuous Sampliasg
150
Mobilization/Demobilization and Per Diem
Mob/DemoS 50 Miles
$245.00 Lamp Sun,
Mob/Detnob 50 Stiles
$2.50/Mile 50 Miles one-way (max 450 additional miles)
Drill Crew (3 Person)
Per
Diem
$190.00
SECTION 0: DIRECT PUSH TECHNOLOGY
Day Raie for a
Direct Push Unit
$1410/Day
- See
Note 4
Per Foot Charge
$12.50/Foot
Expected Footage per Stssdard (10-how) Day
195
Feet/Day
.‘~ddittooalamount/foot for I’ welt completion
$ i2.50
Mobilization/Demobilization and Per Diem
\lob’Demob
50
Mites
$145.00 Lwnp Suns
Mob/DemoS 50 slttes
SI .90/Mtlt50 Miles one-way (nax 450 additionalmiles)
Doll Crew (2 Pcrsonl Per Dtem
$130.00
‘isle,:
At some sites, in eneed may
arise for tite installation ofa well that isolates ant lapper saturated zone in oeder 0 define the conisaniutant plume in a lower saturated zone. Wltçn the need for such a dual-cased
0 eli is acre ed upon between the owner/operator and the TNRCC, the woekptan and cost proposal subm,oed to the 1’INRCC roe preappooval should colisaua (nice bids brute tnsiallanon of inete wells,
Sabnt
ned
costs ssitt be resiewed on a case-by-case basis.
2: In
situations sstterea tow total footage of borings are to be intlailed or a iccond day of utilization ofdit,ct puth technology is required, lie per that charge wilt be used, not to exceed the day rare.
3:
Per Blent seqatretnents foe drill
crews
it descnibcd in the “Tnavel” section of this Appendix
4: too sitCs sshesrttsr Inoiser of
direct of
duetspush borings needing lobe installed is small, the ‘l’Nt&CC may allow ‘a
of one day for
Direct Pout Unit atnsal (at $740.00/d,y), plus $12.50 per foot after inc
I/rst
)S
ceo bite bees ii
siofled
44
PART 4: TRAVEL COSTS
Travel By Air vs. Travel by Surface Vehicle
The
TNRCC
will reimburse for 500 miles round-trip mileage plus 10 hours of travel time or round-trip
coach airf~replus I ‘/~hours of travel time per site visit whichever is smaller. Personnel rates allowed
fortravel time will be determined by the field personnel required to complete the activity as described
in the cost guidelines for each activity. The number of personnel allowed for travel will also be
determined by the number of field personnel in the cost guidelines.
Travel costs will only be paid from the closest office of the RCAS to the site. Mileage rates will be tied
to the applicable Internal Revenue Service rate for mileage, rounded to the next highest cent. As of
November 1, 1996, that rate is 31 cents per mile.
To simpli& the preapproval process, a flat rate of$140.00 per day wilt be allowed for the use of an
“equipment trick”. Thts can be any vehicle, ofany size, either company owned
or
rented. This
vehicle
comes with all ofthe equipment normally used by the operatorfor field work, and may include purgin
and samfimg gear (including pumps and generators), coolers, environmental monitoring devices an
tools. 1 he only equipment not included in the day rate for this truck are disposables such as I’PE,
bailers, visqueen, ice cameras, film, etc. These disposabies are costed out on ayer well, per cubic
yard, or per day bask as appropriate to the specific activity. Included in the $140.00 cost of the
equipment truck is the first 100 miles oftravel. II a vehicle is going to be utilized to conduct work on
more than one site on a given day, the operator must split travel time between the sites, or lump all
travel costs on a single site.
Per Diem and
Non-reimbursable
Costs
Per diem (meals and lodging) will be paid for site activities requiring more than one day of field work
and
occurnng at a site greater than 90 miles (one way) from the closest offlce of the RCAS. The per
Ui?thwill be a maximum of $80.00 or actual cost, whichever is !ower, per individual required for the
activity. All receipts for lod_ging and food must be submitted with the reimbursement application for
per diem to be reimbursed. l’er diem for drill crews will be $190.00 for a standard three-person crew
(rotary rig) or $130.00 for a two-person direct push crew. Lodgin,g receipts must be submitted with
the drilling invoice(s) for drill crew per diem to be reimbursed. Other travel costs for drill rigs and
crews are discussed in the “Drilling and Well Installation” unit costs in this Appendix.
The following travel expenses are not reimbursable;
•
Personal trips;
•
Overtime;
•
Entertatnment; and
•
Travel forany purpose not directly related to the performance of necessary corrective action.
45
PART
5:
EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COSTS
The following tables contain maximum reimbursable costs for a variety of large and small equipment,
along with commonly used supplies. The total reimbursable cost for leased/rented equipment will not
exceed the normal retail price for that piece of equipment, plus mark-up.
Equipment (Small)
Daily
1
Weekly
Monthly
Puithase
Ab,orbent Booms
CX36”-each
$500
6X
0-each
$30.00
~
X Ia’-
each
$40.00
Aeration Trays- Set Note I
$100.00
$2400.00
Air Compressor, & Gecerator,
AC-3/4 horsepower
$15.00
$70.00
$200.00
AC- 2 Horsepower
$20.00
$75.00
$250.00
AC-S I4ortepoweT
$25.00
$100.00
$300.00
$7200.00
AC- ISO CFM & Paving Breaker (Jackhammer)
$85.00
$325.00
$950.00
GEN- 400 Wars
$50.00
GEN- 3500 Watt
$75.00
Air Strippers- See Note
I
515.25000
Railer,
Bailer (Teflon or polypropylene. disposabie)
$i.00
Bader (PVC. dedicated)
$15.00
Carbon Absorber,, Drum Type- See Note I. (Include, in,tatI*tion. Tetycl,ng.
2nd/or disposal.)
$750.00
Data Collector,
Dstalogger (2 channel)
$65 00
$325.00
Datalogger (8 c~amseI)
$115.00
$575.00
Pressure Tsans4ucer
$35.00
$175.00
OVM Melee (PID. FID)
-
See Note?
Combustible Gas Meter- See Note?
pH. ConducSvtry. Temperalure Meoer- See Note 2
Dissolved Otygen Meter- See Note 2
O,ygeo. Catbon Dto’ctdr, Methane Gas Meter- See Note 2
interface Probe- See Note 2
Field Teat Kiln
and/or Meters for
Water Alkalinity, Reajox. Chionde, iron. Ninte,
Sulfate. Phosphate- Sec Note 2
—
Concrete
$55.00/cy
46
Concrete Save
$50.00
$15.00
Fence,
Compound Fence Wood/Chain)
5850,00
Chain Link, S/Foot
$3.50
$9.00
TemporasyConsffuctionBaSe~$/i00Fecl
$1.00
$8.00
$100.00
Hand Augers
Manual
$15.00
$60.00
Power
$45.00
$180.00
.Jackhammer(electric)
.
$40.00
$150.00
55*00
Oit/Water Separator, Gravity Type-See Note I
$2,000.00
Pumps
Gas Powered, 2’ Diameter, ISO GPM
$50.00
$200.00
Pseumalar
$75.00
$225.00
$2,000.00
2’, Electhc Submersible. 0 GPM
$45.00
SI$0.00
See
Note I
4’, Eiecthc Submersible. 20 GPM
$30.00
$200.00
See Note I
Skimmers
Passive (I Liter)
$10.00
$30.00
$350.00
Eiecatc
515,00
5265.00
$3200.00
Holding Tank,-
See Note I
55 Gallon
Barrel or Doam
$40.00
1,000 Gallon
$25.00
$75.00
$225.00
57*00
5.000
Gallon
$35.00
$105.00
$315.00
$3,750.00
21.000 Gallon
$100.00
$300.00
$900.00
Stripping Tower,- See Note I
$475000
SVE Puns Tessttquipnncnt
Blower. IS Horsepower
$20.00
Blower. S Horsepower
$35.00
Blower, IS Ilorsepower
$50.00
.
Pressure Gauges
‘
$75.00
CarbonCsnsster(dnsmtypc)
$45.00
$500.00
SVE Probe
$250.00
An SVE Itatlee w/ all necessaay equtpmenl
$500.00
.
Survey Equipment
$30.00
$12000
Traffic
Control Cons ponents
Bathcsdes
Cones/flelinealors (per 25)
$1.00
15,00
$4.00
520,00
1(4.00
550.00
115.00
$115.00
47
Signs
$1.00
$3.00
$11.00
$3500
—
Well MaterIal,- See Nose 3
7’ PVC Casing, Schedule 40, Per Foot
$2.00
2’ PVC Screens, Schedule 40, Pet Foot
.
$4.00
7’PVCTiareaded
Cap
,
,
$5.00
4’ PVC Casing. Schedule 40, Per Foot
$4.00
4 PVC Sceeen, Schedule 40, Pen Fooo
$8.00
4’ PVC Tiutaded Cap
$9.00
FtlterSand, IOOLb. Bag
$5.00
Concrete, Ready Mix, 90Lb. Bag
$3.50
Concrete. Pottiand Cement, 90 Lb. Bag
$7.50
Sand Cement Slsaeay BackOll w/ Dtliveay, Percy
$40.00
Bentonite Grout. 50 Lb. Bag
$23.00
Bentonile Chips. 50 Lb. Bag
$7.50
Bennomae Tablels, 50 Lb. Bag or Bucket
$31.00
Miscellaneou,
Small Itemo- See hole 4
$20.00
Tedlar Bage
$7.30
Viaqueen. 6 mu. 20’ X IOU’
$60.00
Equipment (Large)
Hourly
Daily
Weekly
Backhoes (operated)- See Note S
Lsght’duty (52-It’ dsgging depth)
($3Sihr eental& 540/Its operator)
$75.00
$495.00
$2,125.00
Medium-duty (I 5-20’ digging depth)
(55Ghz rental & 540hz operator)
590,00
$570.00
$2,300.00
lleavv’duly (I 7-21’ digging depth)
($7Oflar rental & $dOlar operat,r)
5110,00
$670.00
$2,650.00
Connpacsora (oprraard)
Walk-behind
($2Oflar rental & $3oflvoperasor)
$50.00
$340.00
$1,500.00
Riding
(525Th,
rental & $30,lai operator)
$55.00
$365.00
$1575.00
Loaders (operated)
Bobcat
($200ir rental & 540hz operator)
$60.00
$420.00
$1900.00
Light-duty (up to tOO hp)
($3Oi3te rental & 540,1st operator)
$70.00
$470.00
$2,050.00
Heavy-duty (greater than 100 lip)
($SOhu rental & 540Th’ operator)
$90.00
$570.00
$2,350.00
Tracked
Ezeavators
(operated)
Light-dansy (20-22’ digging depth)
(SSShsr rental & $40Tho openanon)
$125.00
$145.00
$Z875.00
Medium-duty (24-26’ digging depth)
(5100,11, rental & S4ofliropceator)
$140.00
$820.00
$3,100.00
Heavy-duty (26’ digging depth)
($12041, rental & $4othzopcntor)
—
$160.00
$920.00
$3,400.00
Trucks
48
Equipment Truck - See Note 6
$140.00
10 cy Dump (operated)
$50.00
Bitt
aclually
utnne
used,
14 cy Dtunsp (operated)
$55.00
20cy Dump
wi
~aiIer (operated)
$60.00
.
Vacuum Tn,cls (operated)
$65.00
Notes:
I: Equipmentpurchased for the inanaliabon of a remediation system will becosied out by quote by the RCAS in the Interim ContctiveActiont PIanfICAP) (tee AcBvityO2), the Corrective Action Plan
(çAP)ser Activity 08), or the woaicplanand cost ~t,roponalsubmitted for Remedial System Installation (ace Actsviuy 09). These quotes must be included when these documents are tubmatted to the
NRLL. Becauae ofthe uotque nature ofeach tnd,vidual sine, and the range ofequipment types available us the uadtasUy, the RCAS should design the tenaediatiott system with both efficiency and cost
in mind. The cost proposals br eemedaanon systems will be reviewed on a case-by-case bastn.
2: The majorinyofdasa collectIon dev,cea aeeconauhant-owued and will be included in thecoatoflhe Consultane’a Eqinipinent Truck, which is reimbursed atthe eaee o($140,00perday. plus mileage
over tOO mslea round tnp. Please refer to the “Travel”sectIon an that Appendix.
3: Well matetiaJs ate included forref ence. The reinnbursement ofthe cost ofiostallingmonisoringwella is done on aper-foot basis, in whichthc costofwell materials is included. Please referto tine
“Dnlttng
and
Direct Push Technology’ seoson sea thia Appendix.
4: Small items ant those disposables nonnaliy used at an LPST site. They would include sting, gloves, deem, supplies, and distilled water. Other small henna may include tape, pens, paint, ice, and
warnssng tape.
5: Costs foe heavy equipment ate based on a rental charge of five bouts perday and fifteen boutspet week, and an operator chaige of eight hoar, per day and forty hoists pee week.
6: See Appendix A, Past 4~Travel CosIs for a descriprion of the Equipment Tnsack and its use.
49
PART 6: EXCAVATION BACKFILLING, AND
RESURFACIIISTG COSTS
The following tables should be used to calculate all excavation and over-excavation costs along with
the replacement of excavated soils with imported fill, compacting that fill, and resurtacin2 areas
affected by these activities. Please note that all personnel costs, except for stockpile sampling and
report generation, have been built into these flat rates. Also note that the disposal of impacted soils
discovered during a tank removal must be preapproved independent oftank removal activities.
ITEM
2”
ASPHALT
6” CONCRETE
PER CUBIC
YARD
Remove Pavement Over Affected Area, per aq ft
2.50
4.00
Excavate Impacted Soils, percy
9,00
Import Fill, pet cy
t 1.00
Compact Fill, percy
9,00
Resurface Aficcled Area, per set ft
3.50
5.50
N
tiles:
I: if concrete cover is greater than 6’, please note this Fact ott the wotltplan and cost proposal. A TNRCC coordmato,’has the ability to adjust nrinnbursable costs for site-specific eircunialances.
2: Imported fill volume ssill be calculated at the rate of 1.3 times the,nsssa, volume ofthe eacavated aoils.
3: Compaction costs includc in-place density tests.
4:0,1 rare occasions, shoring may be necessary to conduct excavation activities. ilyou encounter such a siauataon,jussifscaaion for increased cost must be submitted with the worlepian and cost proposal.
50
PART 7: SOILS AND WASTEWATER
MANAGEMENT COSTS
This section should be used to determine the cost of loading, hauling, and disposing excavated soils
or generated groundwater.
DISPOSAL RESULTING FROM ANY SITE ACTIVITY
MEDIA
METHOD
AlA. SOILS
LOAD AND HAUL
DISPOSE IN LANDFILL
$14.00/C?
‘1500 PPM TNt $45.00/C?’ Ci500 PPM TPH: $10.50/C?; See Nose I
1500 PPM TPH SOILS ONLY
ASPHALT RECYCLING
THERMAL
DESORPTION
BIOREMEDIATION
$35.00/C?; See Note 2
$45.00/C?; See Note 2
535.00/Ct’; See Note 2
GROUNDWATER AND PSU
LOAD, HAUL, & DISPOSE
ON-SITE TREATMENT & DISCHARGE
$75.00/hR for Tnuck plus $00.40/GAL Disposal
See
Note
3
Notes:
I: Noted costs for landfill dispossl ste maxhtsss,s coIls. The TNRCC wilt reinshumse actual costs (landfill receipts muss be included with the Application for Reimnbiursersent) plus allowable mails-up.
2: The nosed alternative technologies foe soils-with 1500 PPM TPH sat maximum reimbasesable costs butdpnostnclude loadina and hauling coals, Where approptiaie, mastic useofaliese sechnolqgies
should be constdered to avoid loading andhauiutg coats. iftbeowtsrr/operatordec,des
to
use these tecluiologaea on soals with ciSOO TI~when a less expensave dttpotal option is available, the TNKCC
wtll eetmbittst the cost ofthe leastexpenttvc option andthe owaxet/openstor wtli absorb the remasastng costs.
3:The T’NRCC wiltootpay foe the disposal ofwatecthflcotlecls in asexcavation because thstexctvaaioaxwas unpeopeely bentted. Sssc~twattr n,ustbe sarnj,led, attheoweser/operstoc’scosl, todetermine
slits smpacled and special handlang is necessany. The costofteatang and subsequent disposal ofgroumadwateruechangang antoan excavation a reurabuasable. Once the desenmtnatmon has been made that
special handtmg it required, the owntr/opeeator should select the most cost effective method of waste dttposai. For the najonty of sttes ‘axTexas. thtsmethod wilt be the use of vacuum leucirs, In certain
areas oldie state that are isolated by dsnlance from companies thatprovide this service, on-site treatment and discharge may be appropnaoe. A coae coanpamlaona should be made ‘a the coat proposal and
workptan amid these costs “all be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
4: Soils enersted during Sue Attestmrtsts thould be drtunatted Os covered and hetd ontite pending the receipt of anatytictt tesutls. If landfill disposal is necessaty, the TNRCC will pay $45.00/drum or
5-55 00/
maximum disposal costs. See Note I.
51
PART 8: REPORT GENERATION COSTS
This section should be used to determine the reimbursable costs for all report forms except Risk
Assessments and Corrective Action Plans,
REPORT
FORM TYPE
PERSONNEL TYPE
j
RATE/HR
HOURS
TOTAL
RELEASE
DETERMINATION REPORT
Project Manager (I’M)
$80.00
2
$160.00
WordProcesaorOVP)
$35.00
I
$35.00
TOTAL
$195.00
FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT (FAR). SEMI-ANNUAL PSI! RECOVERY, PSI! RECOVERY SYSTEM 08cM
Associate Engineer (PS)
$85.00
I
$85.00
StafF
Engiseer/Oeologisl(SF)
.
$10.00
2
$140.00
WI’
$35.00
I
$35.00
TOTAL
5260.00
INTERIM CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (ICAP)
Ptincipsl Engineer (P3)
5110.00
I
$110.00
Pt
$85.00
3
$255.00
PM
580.00
2
$160.00
SF
$7000
t2
$g40.oo
Oraflsperson 11(02)
550.00
5
5250.00
Wp
$35.00
6
$210.00
TOTAL
$1,825.00
FAR’ £511 RECOVERY SYSTEM INSTALLATION
P3
I
$110.00
$110.00
SF
$
$70.00
$560.00
D2
3
$50.00
$150.00
-
WP
I
$35.00
$35.00
TOTAL
5855.00
RISE ASSESSMENT UPDATE or FAR - SITE ASSESSMENT
-
See Note
PM
$80.00
I
$80.00
SF
$70.00
4
$280.00
WP
$35.00
I
$35.00
D2
$45.00
2
590.00
TOTAL
$485.00. See Noee I
FAR.
REMEDIATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION (ECEPT PSI! RECOVERY SYSTEM)
52
SeruorEngineerQ’2)
$95.00
2
$190.00
Pt
585,00
4
$340.00
SF
$70.00
20
$1,400.00
WI’
$35.00
2
$70.00
D2
$50.00
6
5300.00
TOTAL
$2,300.00
FAR. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ADDENDUM
P1
58500
2
‘
$170.00
WP
$35.00
I
$35.00
02
550,00
2
$100.00
TOTAL
$305.00
a.
ANNUAL REPORT- GROUNDWATER MONITORING ONLY
a
PM
$80.00
I
$80.00
SF
$70.00
4
$280.00
WI’
$35.00
I
$35.00
DI
545.00
I
545,00
TOTAL
$440.00
ANNET,SL REPORT- OPERATtON. MONITORING, AND PERFORMANCE
92
$95.00
2
$190.00
PM
580.00
5
5400.00
SF
$70.00
6
5420.00
WP
$35.00
3
$105.00
Dl
$45.00
4
$180.00
TOTAL
$1,295.00
StTE CLOSURE REQUEST
J
PM
j
$10.00
3
$240.00
I
Wr
$35.00
I
535,~~
TOTAL
$275.00
FINAL SITE CLOSURE REPORT
I-
PM
.
$80.00
2
$tGO,00
1
WP
$35.00
I
$35.00
TOTAL
-
5195.00
Notes:
I: This coal as foes Risk Asaestmersl Update or loran FAR in which one boring or monitoring well was tiss&Ied, DI, WP. and PM time mas be inceeaaed 55 hour ($80.00) for teeny oaonalonng well or soil
bona( installed dua~nga given evens, In addition, the RCAS may bill PM (2 has.), 01(2 lan.), and WP (I he.) time toaalisn8 $285.00 fit the flint day of Direct Putt,, and $142.50for eveny addilsonst ‘A day of
Direc Push.
PART 9: MARK-UP
53
ITEM
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MARK-UP
LABORATORY COSTS
10
WASTE MANAGEMENT
,
.
10
UTILITIES
10
SUBCONTRACTED PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL
0
ALL OTHER SUBCONTRACTOR INVOICES
15
Noses:
Meek-upis allowed for the peimany constactor and/on abe Rtgiattnd Conearse Action Specislist (consullarat). It may only tat addedto sasbcontacton invoices. It
may
ap$icd only once (foe iastancc. a
conaulraesl may not charge a mast-up upon a coat which has been marked-up by a subcontractor).
2: Consullsnb and conuactora may not charge a mart-up on their own internal expenses.
3: Retail mast-up is neat allowed, All invoices on which a mask’up isbe’assg applied .,aaatbe submitted with
the
Application forReimlstaneinent,
54
PART 10: CHANGE ORDERS
The preapproved workplan
and cost proposal
represent the accepted activity to be performed and the
maximum reimbursable
cost
for that activity (including allowable markup).
Modifications to the
preapproved workplan and cost proposal can be made only as follows:
Field Activity Change Orders
Un occasion, ~sIte speciric circumstances and unforeseeable~developments can rest4t in an
owner/operator incurring expenses exceeding the preapproved maximum cost. Examples of sItuations
where this can occur are costs associated with drilling delays due to bad weather, or additional costs
associated with hitting an unanticipated rock layer while drilling. Please note that these situations are
related to field activities and not office associated activities. Depending on the magnitude of the
unforseen problem, the owner/operator should proceed as follows:
Field activity changes resulting in a cost change greater than 7 of the preapproved amount:
Ifunanticipated events occur in the field during the performance ofa preapproved activity which cause
an additional expense exceeding 7 ofthe total preapproved amount (e.g., an amount greater than
$1 400.00 on an activity preapproved for $20,000.00), then preapproval must be obtained from the
Tr4RCC before continuing the activity. Failure to obtain the infield approval will result in the
additional costs being nonreimbursable. Conditional verbal ~pprovatcan be obtained from the TNRCC
to continue with the actIvity while in the field however, final approval ofthe activity and costs will
be granted only after the review ofa submitted field change order. The change order must detaIl the
additional field activities and associated costs and must conform to the standard workplan and cost
proposal format.
Field activity chaqges resulting in a cost change exceeding the preapproved amount, but is less
than or equal to 7:
Ifunanticipated events occur in the fieldduring the performance ofa preapprovedactivity which cause
an additional expense exceeding the total preapproved amount, but is less than or equal to 7
ofthe
total preapproved amount (e.g., an amount less than or equal to $1,400.00 on an activity preapproved
for $20,000.00), then a change order detailing the additional field activities and associated cosfs must
be submitted at the completion of the activity and must conform to the standard workplan and cost
proposal format. Infield approval prior to continuing the activity is not required. Approval ofthe
change order will be granted only afterthe review of a submitted field change order.
Field activity changes resulting in a cost change which is less than the preapproved amount:
Ifunanticipated events occur in the field during the performance ofa preapproved activity which cause
some ofthe scope ofwork items to be eliminated or not performed; then the associated costs shopld
be reduccd. A change order does not need to be submitted for appro~a1;however, documentation
should be submitted to document the change in work scope and indicating that this activity has been
completed. Should it be determined that the activity is incomplete and the original scope of work
should be performed, then that scope of work should be completed for the original preapproved
amount.
General Change
Orders
L)uring the pertormance ot a preapproved activity, should any unanticipated non-field-activity events
occur whic’h cause an additional expense exceeding the total preapproved amount (e.g., additional
personnel hours needed to handle a change in municipal permit requirements), a change order detailing
the additional activities and associated costs must be submitted and must conform to the normal
workplan and cost proposal format. Preapproval must be obtained fl-em the TNRCC prior to initiating
the additional activities. Failure to obtain the preapproval will result in the additional costs being
nonreimbursable. Final approval wilt be grantedonly afterthe review ofa submitted general change
order.
55
For any ofthe above-referenced change orders, a copy of the change order documentation detailing
the additional activities and associated costs along with a copy of the original preapproved cost
proposal must be submitted with the application for reimbursement, to be considered for
reimbursement. In all cases, the change order should document only the additional scope of work and
the additional expenses (e.g., the additional $1,400.00 on an activity preapproved for $20,000.00), not
the total activity. If the owner/operator continues to complete the activity without preapproval of the
additional activities, then the excess costs are nonreimbursable.
Change orders are intended for costs for unforseen or unanticipated events and are n~otto be used fçr
adding profit, forgotten items, etc. All change orders must be documented and justified. If it is
determined that the change order is not warranted or sufficient justification has not been provided, the
change order will not be approved.
56
APPENDIX B
DEFINITIONS and ACRONYMS
57
PART 1: DEFiNITIONS
FREE PRODUCT MIGRATION- The continuous movementoffree product from the subsurface ofthe pound to the surface or from
the subsurface mW a subsurface receptor.
FREE PRODUCT- (Also, phase-separated product. Also phase-separated hydrocarbon. Alsophase separated petroleum. Also
LNAPL.) A regulated substance in its free-tiowing non-aqueous liquid phase at standard conditions of temperature and pressure (I.e.,
liquid
not
dissolved
in water or adhering to soil)that is also a “recoverable free product”
by the definition
in this section.lt is
distinct and visually separable from the surrounding media This definition does not including hydrocarbon “sheens.”
LNAPL-
Lig)tt non-aqueous phase liquid- See “Free Product”
PHASE-SEPARATED PRODUCT- See “free product.”
PHASi~-SEPARATEDHYDROCARBON- See “Free product.”
PHASE SEPARATED PETROLEUM- See “Free Product,”
RECOVERABLE FREE PRODUCT- (Also, Recoverable Phase -Separated Product. Also Recoverable Phase-Separated Hydrocarbon)
(I) Any free product In continuous movementfrom the subsurface
ol
the ground to the siirface. (2) Free product in a sub~urface
receptor with a
thickness greater
than 1/10th of one foot. For reimbursement purposes, this does not mciude free product in tankboid
observation
wells
unless the
site meets
the requirements of 30 TAC 334.302
(a~l).
RECOVERABLE PHASE-SEPARATED HYDROCARBON- See “Recoverable free product”
RECOVERABLE PHASE-SEPARATED PRODUCT- See ‘Recoverable free product.”
NOTE: SEE 30 TAC
~334.322
CONCERNING
SUBCHAPTER H DEF1NITrONs, FOR ADDITIONAL
DEFINITIONS.
58
PART 2: ACRONYMS
§
Section
AST
Aboveground Storage Tank
BOD
Biological Oxygen Demand
BTEX
Berizene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes
CADiCADE)
Computer Aided Drafting/Computer Aided Drafting & Design
CAP
Corrective Action Plan
CAPM
Corrective Action Project
Manager
COD
Chemical Oxygen Demand
cft
Cubic Feet (volume)
cy
Cub!c Yard (volume)
cfl~
Cubic Feet per Minute (atr flow)
DNAPL
Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (sinks in water)
DO
Dissolved Oxygen
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
FAR
Field Activity Report
FED
Ftame Ionization Detector
ft
Feet (length)
(IC
Gas
Chromatograph
gpm
Gallons per Minute
hp
Horsepower
hr
Flour
ICAP
Interim Corrective Action Plan
ICU
Internal Combustion Unit
kg
Kilogram
Liter
lbs
Pounds
LF
Linear Feet
LEL
Lower Explosive Limit
LNAPL
Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (floats on water)
LPST
Leaking Petroleum Storage Tank
mg
Milligram
MTBE
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether
MW
Monitoring Well
NAPL
Non-Aqueous
Phase Liquid
O&M
Operation and Maintenance
OMP/OM&P
Operation, Maintenance, and Performance
OVM
Organic Vapor
Meter (see lID, PlO)
PAH
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon
PP
Professional Engineer
PID
Pholo-lonization Detector
PM
Project Manager
ppb
Parts per Billion
PPE
Personal Protective Equipment
ppm
Parts per Million
PSH
Phase-Separated Hydrocarbon
PST
Petroleum Storage Tank
QA/QC
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
RA
Risk Assessment
RAP
Remedial Action Plan
RBA
Risk Based Assessment
RBCA
Risk Based Corrective Action
RCAS
Registered Corrective Action Specialist
RCG
Reimbursable Cost Guidelines
RP
Responsible Party
-
Sum-VGA
Seen-Volatile Organic Aromatic
Senir-VOC
Semi-Volatile Organic Compound
SqFL sf
Square Foot (arei)
SVE
Soil Vapor Extraction
TCLP
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
TDS
Total Dissolved Solids
TOC
Total Organic Carbon
TOX
Total Organic Halogen
TPH
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TNRCC
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
TWC
Texas Water Commission (now the TNRCC)
Microgram
lisT
Underground Storage Tank
VES
Vapor Extraction System
VOA
Volatile Organic Aromatic
VOC
Volatile OrganicCompound
yd
Yard (length)
59
ATTACHMENT
7
-
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
II. RELEASE REPORTING
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
H. Release Reporting
‘repare
proposal, Meet With Client,
Travel to
site,
Communicate
with
CCC
Principal
A. Review/QAQC Report
$100.00 /hr
1 hours
$100.00
Project Manager
A. Project Management/Prepare Proposal to Client
B.
Meeting
wI
Client
C.
Travel
D.
Mileage
$75.00 /tir
$75.00
Ihr
$75.00
Air
$1.00
/rni
-
1.5 hours
1.5 hours
2 hours
100
miles
$112.50
$112.50
$150.00
$100.00
$35.00
Clerical
A. Correspondence/Filing
$3500 /hr
1 hours
Additional Costs
A. Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
$2.50 /mi
miles
$0.00
l’ótil Cc,st foi Release Reporting—: •:•::•H
•:
•.—: —
Last Updated October 11, 2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
Ill. INITIAL RESPONSE & ABATEMENT
Task
‘
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
(ft. In~tlat
Response &
Abatement
-
-
Prepare report~s),Other requirements
Principal
-
-
A.
Review/QAQC Report
$100.00 /hr
1 hours
-
$100.00
Project Manager
A. Prepare Report
B.
Prepare Required Checklist
C.
Review for Need of Public Notice
$75.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
3 hours
1 hours
2 hours
$225.00
$75.00
$150.00
Clerical
A. Correspondence/Filing
$35.00 (hr
I hours
$35.00
Total
Cost
for
Initial-Response’
-
: —
*
H
—
-H—
‘—$585.00
Last Updated October
11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
IV. SITE CHECK & ISCR
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
IV. Site Check & 15CR/CAP -
--
Prepare
reports,
Other requirements
Principal
A. Review/QAQC Report
$100.00 /hr
2 hours
$200.00
Project Manager
A. Prepare Report
8.
Prepare Required Checklist
C.
Project Management
-
D.
Regulatory/Client Coordination
$75.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
$75.00
/hr
$75.00 /hr
8 hours
I hours
2 hours
1 hours
$600.00
$75.00
$150.00
$75.00
StaffHydrologist
A. Perform Sensitive Receptor Survey (660)
B.
Site Sketch
C.
Travel
0.
Mileage
$55.00 /hr
$55.00 /hr
$55.00 /hr
$1.00 /mi
6 hours
2 hours
2 hours
100 miles
$330.00
$110.00
$1l0.00j
$100.00!
-
Drafting
A. Site Sketch
$45.00 (hr
1 hours
$45.00
Clerical
A. Correspondence/Filing
$35.00 (hr
-
1
hours
$35.00
Additional
Costs
A.
Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
Per
Diem
(check
if applicable)
8.
Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage in Third Column
$2.10 (ml
miles
-
miles
$0.00
$0.00
Total Cost
for Site Check & ISCRICAP:-’
.-::-.-*-:-,-.-:
,-‘:--,-.-
~
‘-‘ ,‘~‘ ,‘,~ ~-: ,~-,-
~
Last Updated October 11, 2001
-
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
VI. ORBCA TIER 2
Task
Unit Cost
Iota) Units
Estimated Cost
$.-DRBCATiDt2
-- -
-~
:-
Oat,
compilation,
Report preparation
Principal
A. ReviewfQAQC Report
$100.00 (hr
6 hours
$600.0C
Proiect Manager
A. Project Management
B- Regulatory/Client Coordinatiot
C. RiskAnalysis/Report
$75.00 (hr
$75.00 (hr
$75.00 (hr
10 hours
10 hours
24 hours
$750.00
$750.00
$1,800.00
Draft/ng
A.
ORBCA Maps/Logs
$45QQ (hr
10 hours
$450.00
Clerical
A.
Correspondence & Filing
$35.00 (hr
10 hours
$350.00
--
-.---,‘,-,--‘:,-.-, U,-P~e
0
Check here it ORECA Tier 2 Cases With Partial or
All Delineation §ea Guidancev
$3,500
00
II
- -
-
-- -
:-.
:t~J
‘G$ieck-l’te~-if-~jer2
Molifled-Acldendutit-’,--,’-,’-’
-
Last Updated
October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
VII. SOIL BORING INSTALLATION
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
ViL:Soft-:8odflth~stalta
-. -~
-~
-
-
-
Project Management
A. Principal Oversight
B. Project Manager
$100.00 /hr
$75.00 /1w
2 hours
5 hours
$200.00
$375.00
Field
Work
Personnel & Equipment
A. Supervise DriVing
-
B. Travel Time
C. Mileage
0. Organic Vapor Monitor
E. Decon Unit
$55.00
/hr
$55.00 /hr
$1.00 /mi
$80.00 /day
$10.00 /day
.
2 hours
2 hours
100 miles
1 day
I day
$110.00
$110.00
$100.00
$80.00
$10.00
Subcontracted
Services &
Equipment
A. Drill & Continuous Sample a 10” Diameter
Hole
B. Mobilization/Demobilization
C. Decon
0. Mileage
E. Drums
F. Supplies
G. Laboratory Analyses (BTEX, TPH (GRO or DRO))
H. Markup
$21.00 Mt
$300.00
lea.
$125.00
lea,
$4.00 lmi
$30.00 (drum
$20.00 (unit
$105.00 /sample
20 feet
I ea.
1 ea.
100 miles
1 drums
1 units
1 samples
$420.00
$300.00
$125.00
$400.00
$30.00
$20.00
$105.00
$140.00
Report Preparation
A. Project Manager - Report Preparation
B. Clerical
C. CADD Drafting
$75.00 (hr
$35.00 (hr
$45.00 (hr
2 hours
2 hours
1 hours
$150.00
$70.00
$45.00
D/sposal
A. Field Tech Time
B. Field Tech Travel
C. Field Tech Mileage
$45.00 (hr
$45.00 (hr
$1.00 /mi
1 hours
2 hours
100 miles
$45.00
$90.00
$100.00
Additional Costs
A.
B,
C.
Additional Borings
Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
Footage Over 20 ft (per
boring(ft)
$710.00
$8.00
$40.00
/boring
/mi
-
(boring/ft
borings
miles
total extra ft
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Per Diem (Check Mileage if Applicable)
D. Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage in Third Column
miles
$0.00
E.
F.
Enter Total Footage in Third Column
Deduction of $40/ft for Borings
c
lOft
$40.00 (boring/ft
ft
total ft
$0.00
$0.00
Total Cost for Soil Boring:lnstailationl-frounded t
Total Cost for One Boring
- -
::~*-:*•:
::H.
-- :---~:--:-.H-
-
III
LI
Check here if Stand-Alone Boring Installation
$710
00
II
initial Soil Boring Installation
-
-- - - -
-
--
-
-- - .
-
-:-
-
-
-
- -:
-- ~-- ---
-~
-
--:-----:-:-:•:-I-:-.-:-:-:-:-:-:-;-:-:-:-:-:
-$3;025,00
The Stand-Alone Boring Cost to be used when mobbing with other drilling activities.
Last Updated October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
VIII. PUSH-PULL
PROBE
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
~
ø1_t~~~.::__C.~f;~i~D$
~
-
Project Management
A. Principal
$100.00 /hr
2 hours
$200.OC
B. Project Manager
$75.00 /hr
5 hours
$375.00
Staff- Hydrologist
A. Field - Day
$55.00 (hr
8 hours
$440.00
B. Travel
-
$55.00 (hr
2 hours
$110.00
C. Mileage
$1.00 (mi
100 miles
$100.00
Other
Staff
D. Report Preparation
$75.00 (hr
2 hours
$150.00
E. Clerical
$35.00 (hr
2 hours
$70.00
F. Drafting
$45.00 (hr
7 hours
$315.00
Field Supplies
A. Drums
$30.00 (drum
-
2 drums
$60.00
B. Misc.
$25.00 lea.
1 ea.
$25.00
D. Vapor Meter (ie PID, OVA)-
$80.00 (day
1 days
$80.00
F. Decon
$10.00 (day
I days
$10.00
SubTotal
-- -- --
:-.--.--
I-
-:
- --
-: -:
A. Rig
$1,400.00 (day
1 days
$1,400.00
B. Mob
$200.00 (day
1 days
$200.00
C. Decon
$125.00 (day
1 days
$125.00
0. Mileage
-
$3.00 /mi
100 miles
$300.00-
E. Markup
$203.00
Disposal
A. Field Tech Time
$45.00 (hr
1 hours
$45.00
B. Field Tech Travel
$45.00 (hr
2 hours
$90.00~
C. Field Tech Mileage
$1.00 (mi
100 miles
$10000t
SubTotal II
-
-- --
-
::-:;-.-:-HH-:
-*
:~*.:::..
-
Additional Costs
A. Additional Days ,
$2,463.00 (day
days
$0.00
B~Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
$6.80 imi
miles
$0.00
Per Diem
C. Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage in Third Column
miles
$0.00
0. Enter Total Footage in Third Column
ft
$0.00
lotal for Push—Pull Probe (rounded to- nearest dollar:
-T~
:.~J-::-
Last updated October 11,2001
10(13(2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
IX. VAPOR WELL INSTALLATION
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
IX
Vapor Well Installation
Principal
A. Oversight
$100.00 (hr
0.5 hours
$50.00
Proiect Manager
A.
Project Management
$75.00 (hr
4
hours
$300.00
Staff
Hydrologist
A. Supervise drilling
B. Travel
C. Mileage
$55.00
(hr
-
$55.00 (hr
$1.00 /mi
3 hours
2 hours
100 mfles
$165.00
$110.00
$100.00
Field Technician
A. Sample(Survey(2 People)/Disposal
B.
Travel (3 man-hour trips)
C.
Mileage (2
trips)
$45.00
/hr
$45.00 (hr
$1.00 /rni
4
hours
6
hours
200 miles
$18000
$270.00
$200.00
Vapor
Well
Report
A.
Proiect Management
B. Map/Log
C. Clerical
$75.00 /hr
$4500 (hr
$35.00 (hr
2 hours
2 hours
2 hours
$150.00
$9000
$7000
Field Supplies
A. Drums
B. Misc.
$30.00 (ea.
$25.00 lea.
2 Ca.
1 ea.
$60.00
$25.00
Rental Equipment
A. Organic Vapor Monitor
B. Decon
$8000 lea,
$10.00 (ea.
1 ea.
1 ea.
$80.00
$1000
Analytical Samples
A. BIEX, TPH (8020(8015 or 8100)
B. Soil Vapor Sample
C. Mark-up
$105.00 (ea.
$175.00 (Ca.
-
1 ea.
1
ea,
$105.00
$17500
$28.00
Drilling and Completion
A. 2” or
4” PVC Vaporwell
B. Mob/Dernob
C. Oecon
0. Mileage
-
E Mark-up
-
-
$32.00
(foot
$30000 /ea.
$125.00 /ea.
$4.00
lmi
20 feet
1 ea.
1
ea.
100 miles
$640.00
$300.00
$125.00
$400.00
$150.00
Total Cost for I Vapor Well
I VW
13 783 00
Additional Costs
A. Additional Vapor Welts
(Includes Lab )
B. Mileage Over 100 Miles Rouridtrip
C. Footage Over 20 ft (per well)
D. Footage loft
per well deduct
Per Diem
E. Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage in Third Column
$1,795.00 (well
$8.00 (mile
$75.00 (ft (well
$75.00
(ft
(well
wells
-
miles
total extra ft
total ft
miles
-
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
-
$0.00
Total Cost ForAll Vapor Wells (roun4edtoiéarijtaotiai~
*-:
H-:H--~:.:
•:-:-:---
Last Updated October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
-
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
X.
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION
Task
‘
Unit Cost
Total
Units
Estimated
Cost
0
-
Pr/nc/pal
A. Oversight
-
-
$100.00 /hr
0.5 hours
$50.00
Project Manager
A. Project Management
$75.00 (hr
-
4 hours
$300.00
Staff
Hydrologist
A. Supervise drilling
B. Travel
C. Mileage
$55.00 lhr
$55.00 /hr
$1.00 lmi
3 hours
2 hours
100 miles
-
$165.00
$110.00
$100.00
Field Technician
A. Develop/Sample(Survey(2 People)(Oisposal
6. Travel (4 man-hour trips)
-
C. Mileage (Strips)
$45.00 (hr
$45.00 (hr
$1.00 (mi
6 hours
B hours
300 miles
$270.00
$360.00
$300.00
Monitoring Well
Report
A. Project Management
B. Map(Log
C- Clerical
$75.00 lhr
$45.00 (hr
$35.00 /hr
2 hours
2 hours
2 hours
$150.00
$90.00
$70.00
Field Supplies
A. Drums
B. Bailer
C. Misc.
$30.00 lea.
$10.00 lea.
$25.00 lea.
2 ea.
1 ea.
I ea.
$60.00
$10.00
$25.00
Rental Eguipment
A. Organic Vapor Monitor
B. OiWWater Interface Probe
C. Survey Equipment
0. Decon
$80.00 (ea.
$45.00 lea.
$25.00 lea.
$10.00 lea.
1 ea.
1 ea.
1 ea.
1 ea.
$80.00
$45.00
$25.00
$10.00
Analytical Samples
A- BTEX, TPH (8020(8015 or 8100)
B. Mark-up
$105.00 /ea.
3 ea.
$315.00
$31.50
Drilling and Completion (20
ft)
A. 2” or 4” PVC Monitoring Well
B. Mob(Derriob
C. IJecon
D. Mileage
E. Mark-up
$32.00
Ift
$300.00 lea.
$125.00 lea.
$4.00 Imi
20 feet
I ea.
1 ea.
100 miles
$640.00
$300.00
$125.00
$400.00
$150.00
Total Cost for I Monitoring Well
1 MW
$4,181.50
Additional
Costs
A. Additional Monitoring Wells
$2,165.00 (well
wells
$0.00
(Includes Lab)
B. Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
$12.70
Imi
miles
$0.00
C. Footage Over 20 ft (per well)
$75.00
lft)weil
total extra ft
$0.00
0. Footage loft per well deduct
$75.00 Itt/well
total ft
$0.00
Per Diem
E. Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage in Third Column
miles
$0.00
F. Enter Total Installation Footage in Third Column
ft
$0.00
rotal-C-ost--For-All ~
Last Updated October 11,2001
10(13(2003
-
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XI. MONITORING WELL SAMPLING
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
kM
o&tir!np,W
-etSam
~ttflØ
-:;~y-:+:::~::,- ~
:-:
. ~
-
Project Management
A. Project Manager
$75.00 lhr
6.5 hours
$487.50
Gauging. Purging. & $ampling
A. Technician
B. Technician Travel Time
C. Technician Mileage
D. Diaphragm Pump For Welt Purging
E. Oiuwater Interface Probe
F. Decon Unit
$45.00 (hr
$45.00 (hr
$1.00 (mi
$46.00 (day
$40.00 (day
$10.00 (day
1 hours
2 hours
100 miles
1 days
1 days
1 days
$45.00
$90.00
$100.00
$45.00
$40.00
$10.00
Eguipment & Subcontracted Services
A. 55-Gallon Drums
B. Disposable Bailers
C. Supplies
0. Laboratory Analyses (BTEX, TPH(GRO or DRO))
E. Markup
-
$30.00 (drum
$10.00 (unit
$23.50 (unit
$105.00 (sample
1 drums
1 units
1 units
1 samples
$30.00
$10.00
$23.50
$105.00
$16.50
Purge Water Disposal
A. Technician
B. Technician Travel Time
C. Technician Mileage
$45.00 (hr
$45.00 (hr
$1.00 /mi
2 hours
2 hours
100 miles
$90.00
$90.00
$100.00
Monitoring
Report
A. Principal -
QNQC
B. Project Manager
-
Report Preparation
C. Project Manager - Preparation for Graphs,
Figures, Tables, and Maps
D. Clerical
E. CAD Drafting
$100.00 (hr
$75.00 (hr
$75.00 (hr
$35.00 (hr
$45.00 (hr
-
2
hours
8 hours
2 hours
4.5 hours
4 hours
$200.O0~
$600.00~
~
$150.00
$180.00!
Total Cost for Sampling
I
Monitoring Well
$2,570.00
-
‘H-:-’
-
-
-
-
‘-~ -‘ - ----::.-
U.-:-’.’’*-Check,hére
1
i
-i_____
-
Additional
Costs
A. Additional Wells (includes lab)
B. Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
Per Diem (Check Mileage If Applicable)
$220.00 (well
$3.80 Imi
wells
miles
miles
ft
$0.00
$0.00
-
$0.00
$0.00
C. Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage in Third Column
D. Enter Total Footage in Third Column
Total
Cost for Monitoring Well $artipling(ioiindea-to-nearest,dollar):---’,:-
-
Last
Updated October 11,2001
10/13(2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XII. OTHER LAB ANALYSIS RATES
XIh-Oth
Anaiflis ~attt
:
--:
:.:~t~-~-~
--:,-
--
-
Analysis
Unit
Total
UnIts
Overnight Estimated Cost
Acetone
$62.50
samples
$0.00
Ammonia
$15.00
samples
D
$0.00
STEX and TPH Combined (Mod 8020/8015)
0
(Gasoline)
$105.00
samples
$0.00
BTEX and TPH Combined (Mod 8020/8015)
0
(Diesel)
$105.00
samples
$0.00
BTEXrrPI-i-G/Naphthalene (Gasoline)
$150.00
samples
0
$0.00
BTEX, TPH - Gas & Diesel (Mod 8020/801 6,
Mod 8000/8100) (Diesel, Used Oil)
$155.00
samples
$0.00
BTEX/TPH (Air)
$175.00
samples
0
$0.00
Chloride
$10.00
samples
0
$0.00
Bulk Density (Dry) ASTM Method 02937-83
$20.00
samples
0
$0.00
C02 (Air)
$50.00
samples
0
$0.00
EPTOX
$35.00
samples
0
$0.00
Grain Size Analysis (Distribution) Seive Analysis
$135.00
samples
0
$0.00
Flashpoint
$25.00
samples
0
$0.00
FOC (Walkley Black Method)
$50.00
samples
0
$0.00
Hydrocarbon Scan
$100.00
samples
0
$0.00
Iron
$15.00
samples
$0.00
Hydraulic Conductivity ASTM Method 05084-90
$180.00
samples
0
$0.00
Lead (Total Lead)
$35.00
samples
0
$0.00
Hydrometer Grain Size plus Sieve Analysis
$90.00
samples
0
$0.00
MBE
$50.00
samples
0
$0.00
MPK
$30.00
samples
0
$0.00
MTBE (8020)
$50.00
samples
0
$0.00
MTBE (8260A)
$250.00
samples
0
$0.00
Nitrate
$24.00
samples
0
$0.00
Oil & Grease
$35.00
samples
0
$0.00
Oxygen
$20.00
samples
0
$0.00
Naphthalene (Mod 8020(8015) (Gasoline or Diesel)
0
$45.00
samples
$0.00
Moisture
$10.00
samples
0
$0.00
$10.00
samples
0
$0.00
$144.00
samples
0
$0.00
Total Phenolic (EPA 420.1)
$40.00
samples
0
$0.00
Phenol (Gaschrom/MS Method 625)
$80.00
samples
0
so.oo
Phosphorous
$25.00
samples
U
$0.00
Porosity (Wet and(or Dry)
$50.00
samples
0
$0.00
Potassium Analyses
$17.25
samples
D
$0.00
Purgeable Halocarbon
$65.00
samples
U
$0.00
Permeability
$180.00
samples
0
$0.00
Sieve Analysis
$45.00
samples
0
$0.00
Specific Gravity
—
$50.00 __________
samples
— 0
$0.00
Last
Updated November20, 2001
10/13(2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XII. OTHER LAB ANALYSIS RATES, PG 2 OF 2
XII. Other Lab AnalysIs Rates, Page 2 of 2
Analysis
Unit
Total Units
Overnight Estimated Cost
Sulfide
TCLP Metals TOX Characteristics (Leaching
Procedures)
-Lead Only
- -8
Metal
- 1
Volatiles EPA 624, 8249, 8260
- I Semi-Volatiles EPA 625, 8270
TDS (Total Dissolved Solids)
TEN Method 8015 Modified (DRO)
TOX (Total Organic Halogen)
TPH Method 8020 Modified (GRO)
Treated 1-420 (STEX, Phenols, PH, TOC) Effluent
TW-1 Phenol, 0 & G, PH
Preparation
TOC (Soil)
TOC (Water) (EPA Yr.5.1)
Volumetric Water Content ASTM Method D2216-90
$10.00
$200.00
$50.00
$325.00
$315.00
$525.00
$10.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$165.00
$85.00
$10.00
$60.00
$55.00
$20.00
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
$0.00
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
-
$0.00
U
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
U
$0.00
0
$0.00
Hydrocarbon Analysis:
STEX 8020/8015
STEX & Naphthalene Mod 8020/8015
TPH (GRO) Mod 8020/8015
STEX 8020/8015
BTEX-Naphthalene Mod 8020/8015
TPH (DRO) Mod 8000/8100
PAN 8100(8270(8310 HPLC
TPH (GRO & DRO) Mod 8000(8100
TCLP
TCLP Set Up
$55.00
$105.00
$50.00
$55.00
$105.00
$50.00
$144.00
$100.00
$200.00
$50.00
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
-
samples
samples
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
U
$0.00
1~ota
Cost
for
AdditionaIl~~abAhaly’sés-(With’1:D’/.:Märkup):--:::
-::-:-:-.1----:---.
I Il-I I
Last Updated November20, 2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XVI.
DISPOSAL
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units Estimated
-w
Cost
I~:
A. Water Disposal - First Drum
0
B. Water Disposal - Every Gallon Thereafter
C. Water Disposal SamplefBTEX, TPH, (CR0 or DRO),
Flashpoint, Total Lead; 1 composite water sample per disposal
event (markup included)
0
D. Soil Disposal - First Drum
Q
E. Soil Disposal - Every Drum Thereafter
F. Soil Disposal Sample IBTEX, TPH, (CR0 or DRO), Total
Lead One Composite Sample per event, includes Markup
0
C.
Bulk Waste Water
H. Bulk Rate Free Product
$200.00 /drum
$2.00 /gal
$180.00 /sample
$200.00 /drum
$65.00 /drum
$154.00 /sampie
$0.45 /gal
$0.95 /gal
0 drum
gallons
0 sample
0 drum
drums
0 sample
gallons
gallons
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Additional Costs
A. Mileage over 100 Miles Roundtrip
(do
not use in
Bulk Rate
Disposal)
B. Hourly charge for bulk rate pick-up and disposal (includes
mileage)
$3.25
/mi
$75.00 /hr
miles
hours
.
$0.00
$0.00
iiI
Check here if- Disposal
costsInotIincludedIinI.otherltasksll(
stalnd_AlonelIPispo
Ofl~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIII
For Stand-Alone Disposal (When Box is Checked), Use Additional Mileage RaU
Below
Project Management
A.
Principal
B. Project Manager
$100.00 /hr
$75.00
mc
I hours
2 hours
$100.00
$150.00
Field Work Technician
A. Technician Work Time
B. Travel Time (2 Trips)
C. Mileage
.
$45.00 /hr
$45.00 /hr
$1.00
Imi
2 hours
4 hours
200
miles
$90.00
$180.00
$200.00
Additional Costs
A. Mileage over 100 Miles Roundtrip
$6.05 /mi
miles
$0.00
iotal Costs lor Disposal ——I
—
I II .I~.I_II
Last Updated October11, 2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XIX. HIGH VACUUM-MULTI PHASE_EXTRACTION
Task
Unit Cost
J
Total Units
Estimated Cost
XtX.:-Thgh’~VatiLQW
at
:y~:~-
1::;.
~I’I
~
--
-~II~
~~-/‘-,
.~:
--
Project Management
A. Principal
B, Project Manager
$100.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
2 hours
5 hours.
$200.00
$375.00
Field Tech
A. Field - Day
B. Travel
C. Mileage
$45.00 /hr
$45.00 /hr
$1.00
/mi
8 hours
2 hours
100 miles
$360.00
$90.00
$100.00
Other Staff
0. Report Preparation
E. Clerical
$75.00 /hr
$35.00 /hr
2 hours
2 hours
$150.00
$70.00
SubTotalIlI.1*I I- ~
-
Vacuum Truck
A. High Vac (includes markup)
B. Low Vac (includes markup)
$2,750.00 /day
$77.00 /hour
days
hours
$0.00
$0.00
SubTOtalIll
II .-II
II-I-II-I-II-I-II-I-II-I-II-I-II-I-III-II-I-.-I-I-H-I I
-i-i-i-i-i-il I-I-I
Additional
Cpsts
A, Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip,
md.
Rig
Mileage (only applicable on High-Vac)
$3.45 /mi
miles
$0.00
Per Diem
.
B. Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage in Third Column
miles
$0.00
~lotalforJ—I~gli—\~ac/l..ow—~~Iac
(
Last Updated October 11, 2001
10/13/2003
Réôbmmended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
Appendix A: Stand-Alone Time And Materials
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
Appendtx A~Stand.Atone Time Md Matedais
A. Car
B. Truck (all trucks)
C. Disposal, etc.
Per Diem Days
$10.00 /bailer
$7.00 /barricade
$75.00 /hr
$200.00 /day
$10.00 /day
$75.00 /hr
$32.00 /ft
$45.00 /day
$45.00 /hr
$80.00 (day
$80.00 (day
$75.00 /hr
$80.00 /day
$55.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
$55.00 (hr
$150.00 /ea.
$45.00 /hr
$55.00 /hr
$25.00 /day
$40.00 /day
$0.50 /mi
$1.00 /mi
$2.50 /mi
$65.00 (day
bailer
barricade
hours
days
days
hours
days
drums
days
hours
ft
days
hours
days
days
hours
days
hours
hours
hours
hours
ea.
hours
hours
days
days
miles
miles
miles
days
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00~
$0.00~
$0.00~
$0.00-
$0.00 I
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Professional Hourly
Rates
A. Principal
$100.00 /hr
hours
$0.00
B. Senior Hydrologist/Engineer
$85.00 /hr
hours
$0.00
C. Project Manager
.
-
$75.00 /hr
hours
$0.0~J
D. Senior Technician/Staff Hydrologist
$55.00 /hr
hours
$0.00
F. Draftsman/Field Technician
$45.00 /hr
hours
$0.00
F. Clerical/General Laborer
$35.00 /hr
hours
$0.00
$45.00
$45.00
$30.00
$80.00
(hr
/day
/drum
/day
Units and Costs
A. Salters
B. Barricades (rental)
C. Base Map
(Standard Time =
4
hours)
0. Data Logger and Trans (rental)
F.
Decon Unit (rental)
F. Develop(Sample(Sucvey(2 People)/Disposal
(Standard Time = 6 hours
G. Diaphragm Pump (rental)
H. Drums
I. FID (rental)
J. Historical Research/Site Visit/Safety Plan
(Standard Time = 6 hours)
K. Monitoring Well (2 or 4 “)
L. Oil/Water Interface Probe (rental)
M. ORBCA Maps/Logs (Drafting)
(Standard Time = 10 hours)
N. Organic Vapor Monitor (rental)
0. OVA (rental)
P. OWRB Search
(Standard Time =
4
hours
Q. PID (rental)
R. Research (Public Notification - Staff Hydro)
Standard Time = 1 hour)
S. Risk Analysis Report (Tier 1/lA)
(Standard Time = 30 hours)
T. Risk Analysis Report (Tier 2)
Standard Time = 24 hours)
U. Sensitive Receptor Survey (660’)
(Standard Time = 6 hours)
V. Sign (Public Notification)
W. Site Sketch (Drafting)
(Standard Time = 1 hour)
X. Site Sketch (Hydrologist)
(Standard Time = 2 hours
Y. Survey Equipment (rental)
Z. Water Depth Gauge (rental)
Mileage Rates
Per
Diem
Last Updated October 11.2001
-
10/13/2003
iThtal Cost torTimeand Matcl
11c,
$o..0c
Last Updated
October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Prolect Management
A. Project Manager
B. Tech Travel
C. Tech (Sock Replacement, Bailing, Gauging, Decon)
D. Tech Mileage
$75.00
$45.00
$45.00
$1.00
(hr
Thr
/hr
/mileage
1
2
2
100
hours
hours
hours
miles
$75.00
$90.00
$90.00
$100.00
Equipment Per Event
A, Oil/Water Probe
B. Decon
C. Drum
0. Supplies
$45.00
$10.00
$30.00
$50.00
(day
/day
/each
/each
1
1
I
I
days
days
drums
unit
$45.00
$10.00
$30.00
$50.00
Additional Costs Per Event
A. Additional Wells
B. Mileage Over 100 miles Roundirip
$50.00
$2.50
(well
/mile
wells
miles
$0.00
$0.00
Per Diem
C. Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage
0. Enter Total Footage in Third Column (200’)
30 miles
feet
$0.00
$0.00
l~Lurt~ber
0 Eventsl.per_QuarterIII
I_I_IIIIII_III_IIII_IIIIIII_II_III_I_I_I_II
-I I1I1.1I1I1III-1I —.—.-I——.—.-I-—I
IIII1 O’i~eflI~S
IIII_IIIIIII_III_I_:_IIIIIIIII_II-II_I_I_IIIIIII.$G~0QII
Quarterly (One Time) Disposal:
A. Tech
6. Tech Travel
C. Mileage
$45.00
$45.00
$1.00
/hr
(hr
(mi
1
2
100
hours
hours
miles
$45.00
$90.00
$100.00
Total
$235.00
Quarterly (One Time) Report
A. Principal
B. Project Manager
C. Clerical
D. Drafting
-
$100.00
$75.00
$35.00
$45.00
/hr
(hr
/hr
(hr
1
6
3
2
hours
hours
hours
hours
$100.00
$450.00
$105.00
$90.00
Total
$745.00
Quarterly Additional Cost
A. Passive Skimmer (2” or 4”)
J $150.00 I/well
I
wells
$0.00
Total Cost for Free-Piod& Ricó~è~iiRiir~il-
-. -
---I- -I
-
~
I~ ~ •-I~II
i~i~iiI•iiI:~i:i::IiIiI:IiIiIi:Ii•iIiIiIi•iIi$980;0Oi
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XVII. PASSIVE FREE PRODUCT RECOVERY/REMOVAL WORKSHEET
Task (Based on 200 ft/day)
Junit
Icost
ITotaI JUnlts lEstimated Cost
-
~
~ir.
LI
(.luck Herefor45 day
report
-
-
-
Last Updated October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Last Updated October 11, 2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XXV.BF
(Back-Fill)
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
A. All inclusive professional time (including
worksheet, phonecalls, etc.)
$75.00 /hour
4
hours
$300.00
B. Sampling Backfill (1 composite sample per
50yd3
-
$13.75 (sample
samples
$0.00
C. Report: includes Site & Sample Map,
Measured Pit Dimensions, Sample Analysis, etc.
$75.00 (hour
I
hours
$75.00
0. When Backfill is Contaminated, See
Guidance-Excavating, Hauling, Replacing
Run Tank Racer
1~0tal:fQr1BF
--
- I:
~III~.I
~
Last Updated October 11, 2001
ATTACHMENT
8
~
DHEC
Bureau ofLand and Waste Management
______
I
Underground Storage Tank Program
_______
2600 Bull Street
PRO\IOT?
PROTrC-.T
pgo!$p:~g
Columbia,SC 29201
Snnrh (‘1,rnhilth I)rpartinent oF Health
Telephone (803) 898-4350 Fax (803) 898-4330
~i,d Knyiron,nrnml I nntrol
May
15,
2001
SUPERB ACCOUNT ALLOWABLE COSTS
Underground Storage Tank (UST) owners or operators, who are responsible for releases that are
qualified to receive monies from the State Underground Petroleum Environmental Response Bank (SUPERB)
Account, will
be
notified when monies are available to perform necessary site rehabilitation actions. Those
releases posing the greatest identified risk to human health and the environment receive funding priority. The
classification system by which the risk and funding priority is determined is outlined in the SUPERB Site
Rehabilitation and Fund Access Regulations, R.61-98.
The SUPERB Act requires that all costs for site rehabilitation receive prior approval from the Department.
If the UST owner or operator wishes to proceed with site rehabilitation actions for a release that is not currently
funded due to its low classification, the Department has a deferred compensation contract that allows the UST
owner or operator to receive approval for reasonable costs with possible future compensation from the SUPERB
Account.
UST owners or operators may select their own site rehabilitation contractor to perform necessary actions
in accordance with the criteria and allowable costs established by the Department. As a customer service, the
Department can directly procure the services of a site rehabilitation contractor for UST owners and operators
upon their request. Any contractor who performs UST site rehabilitation work in South Carolina must be certified
by the Department,
Allowable costs for site assessment, abandonment, and monitoring tasks are outlined below. For active
corrective action, the Department’s criteria requires notice in South Carolina Business Opportunities to obtain
technically acceptable proposals and establish the SUPERB allowable cost.
Established Scopes
of Work
See applicable guidance document for required tasks
Scope
of Work
Southeast Region
All Other Counties
Initial Ground-Water
$1,195.00
$1,395.00
Assessment
Tier I Assessment
$9,880.00
$10,880.00
Notes:
(I) The Southeast region includes the following counties: Beaufort, Berkeley, Charleston, Colleton, Dorchester,
Georgetown, Hampton, Horry, Jasper, Marion, and Williamsburg
(2) If the total-well footage exceeds 25 feet for an Initial Ground-Water Assessment (IGWA) or 75 feetfor a Tier
1 Assessment, the additional footage can be charged to the account at the component rate listed below. Costs
associated with sampling of receptors (ground-water wells) within a 500 foot radius of the source, and
sampling for metals at waste oil USTs can be charged by submitting an assessment component invoice with
the IGWA, or Tier I invoice. As the price for the standard scope includes all project coordination and report
preparation costs, a IS percent markup or handling fee will not be allowed for additional items added to the
IGWA or Tier I invoice.
May IS, 2001
Page 2
SUPERB Allowable Assessment Costs Per Component
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
1.
Plan Preparation
A.Tier II or Monitoring Plan each
$ 100.00*
B.
Tax Map
each
$ 50.00
2. Receptor Survey
each
$ 500.00*
3.
Comprehensive Survey
each
$ 1,000.00
4.
Mob/Demob
A. Equipment
each
$500.00
B. Personnel
each
$ 250.00
5.
Soil Borings (hand auger)
per foot
$ 14.00*
6.
Soil Borings (requiring
equipment, push technology,
etc.) or Field Screening (i.e.,
water sample, soil sample,
or
soil gas sample)
per foot
$ 17.00*
7. Soil Leachability Model
each
‘
$
200.00
8. Abandonment
per foot
$ 4.00*
9. Well Installation
A. Water Table (hand auger) per foot
$ 20.00*
B.
Water Table (drill rig)
per foot
$ 38.00*
C. Telescoping
per foot
$ 58.00*
D. Rock Drilling
per foot
$ 58.00*
10.
Sample Collection
A.
Ground-Water
per well or receptor
$ 55.00
B.
Air or Vapors
per receptor
$
90.00
II. Analyses-Groundwater
A. BTEX+Napth. +MTBE
per sample
$ 100.00
B.
BTEX+Napth. +MTBE
per rush sample
$ 120.00
C. BTEX+Napth. +MTBE+
Trimethylbenzene
per sample
$ 135.00
D. PAHs
per sample
$ 120.00
E. Lead
per sample
$ 20.00
F.
EDB
per sample
$ 55.00
G: 8 RCRA Metals
per sample
$ 140.00
H.
TPH (9070)
per sample
$ 55.00
I. pH
per sample
$ 10.00
J.
BOD
per sample
$ 40.00
K. Nitrate
-
per sample
$ 20.00
L. Sulfate
per sample
$ 20.00
M. Ferrous Iron
per sample
$20.00
N. Methane
per sample
$ 110.00
0.
Organic Lead
per sample
$ 100.00
P. 8
Oxygenates
per sample
$ 85.00
Analyses-Soil
Q. BTEX +Napth.
per sample
$ 100.00
R. PAHs
per sample
$ 120.00
S. 8 RCRA Metals
per sample
$ 150.00
T. TPH (9071)
per sample
$60.00
May 15, 2001
Page 3
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
Analyses-Soil Continued
U. TPH (3550B/8015B)
per sample
$ 65.00
V. TPH (5030B/8015B)
per sample
$ 65.00
W. Grain size / hydrometer
per sample
$ 75.00
X.
Total Organic Carbon
per sample
$ 35.00
12. Aquifer Characterization
A. Pumping Test
per hour
$ 120.00*
B. Slug Test
per test
$ 150.00*
l3. Free Prod
Recovery Rate Test
each
$
120.00*
14. FateeTransport Modeling
A. Mathematical Model
each
$ 300.00
B. Computer Model
each
$ 500.00
15. Tier I Risk Evaluation
each
$300.00
Tier 11 Risk Evaluation
each
$ 500.00
16. Subsequent Survey
each
$ 260.00*
I 7. Disposal
A. Wastewater
1. Purging/sampling
drum
$ 90.00*
2. Pumping Test
gallon
$ 0.60*
B. Free Product
drum
$ 110.00*
C. Soil Treatment/Disposal
ton
$ 50.00*
drum
$ 50.00*
18. Miscellaneous
each
preapproved
19. Report Preparation and
Project Coordination
15 of total for non-standard scopes
*The appropriate mobilization cost can be added to complete these tasks, as necessary.
Description of Tasks Associated with Allowable Costs
PLAN PREPARATION includes all tasks associated with the preparation and submittal of a Tier II
Assessment, well abandonment, monitoring, or other plan requested by the Department. One personnel
-
mobilization shall be allowed to conduct a survey of site conditions and to obtain the tax map prior to plan
preparation. An additional $50.00 may be allowed to obtain and report the information from the applicable
tax map, if the information has not previously obtained as part of the Tier I, Tier H, or other report.
2.
RECEPTOR SURVEY includes all tasks associated with the location, documentation (on an approximately
scaled site map), and screening ofall potentially impacted receptors within 1,000 feet of the facility being
investigated. A receptor includes any person, structure, surface water body, basement, utility, sensitive
habitat, and/or water supply well that are or may be affected by a release. Screening means semi-
quantitative measurement for hydrocarbons using properly calibrated field instruments such as organic
vapor analysis, immunoassay, and/or explosive limit indicator. One personnel mobilization may be added
to this item if it shall be conducted independent of other tasks.
May
15,
2001
Page 4
3.
COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY includes all tasks associated with the spatial location (both horizontal and
elevations) of all existing and former underground storage tanks, lines, dispensers, above and below
ground structures, and potential receptors (identified during the receptor survey). This survey shall be
performed by a S.C. Certified Surveyor. The cost for travel to and from the site by the certified
surveyor and completion ofthe S.C. Certified Survey Map are included in the rate. The report will
include a plat or ma~signed or certified by the surveyor. Mobilization may not be added to this task. Only
one comprehensive survey will be allowed per site.
4.
MOBILIZATION / DEMOBILIZATION
a) Drilling or field screening equipment
-
includes all costs and mileage to transport equipment, materials,
and personnel to and from the site to include all hotel, motel, meals, and other per diem costs. One
mobilization may be allowed to conduct the field screening using direct push equipment and a second
equipment mobilization may be allowed for the drill rig to install permanent monitoring wells. Additional
equipment mobilizations will not be allowed formobilization of drilling support trucks or equipment.
More than two equipment mobilizations at any site shall require justification and preapproval by the
Department for payment. If the geologist that will oversee field screening or well installation is not
associated with the well driller’s firm or company, a personnel mobilization, in addition to the equipment
mobilization, shall be allowed. The plan shall document and justif~’more than two equipment
mobilizations for a site. Ifthe vertical and horizontal extent of chemicals of concern are not filly defined
by the tier report, additional mobilizations may not be approved by the Department.
b) Personnel mobilization includes all personnel travel time, per diem, hotel, motel, food, mileage,
equipment, and materials necessary for completion of site activities that do not include mobilization of
heavy equipment such as direct push vehicles or drill rigs. As many components as possible should be
conducted simultaneously so that unnecessary mobilizations are not conducted (e.g., Aquifer testing can
be completed during the same mobilization event as ground-water sample collection, subsequent survey,
and a receptor survey.). Additional mobilizations shall not be allowed for several persons or several
vehicles all going to the site at the same time. The item number for each personnel mobilization shall be
shown on the assessment component cost proposal form.
5.
SOIL BORINGS (hand auger) includes all costs to advance the boring(s), collect soil, ground-water or
vapor samples as necessary, describe the soil lithology, screen for organic volatiles, and complete the
soil boring logs.
Soil sample shipping and analytical cost is included in component #10. Boring
abandonment may be billed separately. Boring logs or DI-LEC form l903s will indicate if installation was
by hand auger or machinery e.g., drill rig. Any boring converted to a permanent monitoring well will be
compensated only for the installation of the permanent well.
6.
FIELD
SCREENING/
SOIL BORINGS
(requiring equipment
-
e.g., drilling rig, push technology) includes
all personnel, equipment, and materials associated with the advancement of temporary borings/wells,
collection of soil, gas, or water samples, and analysis of the samples using field calibrated instruments
or test kits e.g., organic vapor analysis, immunoassay, and completion of boring! well completion logs
or DHEC form 1903. If the geologist that will oversee field screening is not associated with the well
driller’s firm or company, a personnel mobilization, in addition to the equipment mobilization, shall be
allowed. Boring or screening logs will indicate the name of the SC Certified Well Driller and if installation
was by hand auger or machinery e.g., drill rig, push technology. Any screening point converted to a
permanent monitoring well will be compensated only for the installation of the permanent well.
May
15, 2001
Page 5
7.
SOIL LEACHABILITY MODEL includes all costs associated with the prediction of the fate and transport
of petroleum through the soil to the ground water using either the Department’s leachability model or any
other equivalent method and completion of the Department’s form.
8.
A.BANDONI’iIENT includes all personnel, equipment, and material costs associated with the proper
abandonment of temporary or permanent monitoring wells or borings with a borehole diameter exceeding
one inch in accordance with the S.C. Well Standards and Regulations R.6l-7I under the direct
supervision of a certified SC well driller. One mobilization may be addedto this task, as appropriate (see
/Mb
above).
9.
WELL INSTALLATION
includes all personnel, equipment, and materials to install permanent water table,
rock wells, and telescoping wells in accordance with the S.C. Well Standards and Regulations R.61-7l
under the supervision of a S.C. certified well driller, describe the soil lithology, screen for organic
volatiles, develop the well, determine the depth to ground water and free product, containerize all
generated drill cuttings and development/purge waters, and complete well completion logs.
If the
geologist that will oversee field screening is not associated with the well driller’s firm or company, a
personnel mobilization, in addition to the equipment mobilization, may be allowed. A separate mobilization
shall not be allowed for well drilling or other support trucks. A single per rate foot will be charged for
each drilled well e.g., a well drilled 20 feet in saprolite and 20 foot in bedrock will be considered 40 feet
of rock drilling with only one equipment mobilization. A completed DHEC Form 1903 or similar form
indicating the method of well installation e.g., hand auger, air rotary, hollow stem auger will be submitted
with the final report.
10.
SAMPLE COLLECTION includes all personnel, equipment, and materials necessary for purging,
collection of samples, preparation of vapor or ground-water samples, and shipment to a laboratory. The
collection cost includes all instruments required to document well purging has been accomplished(e.g.,
pH meter, conductance meter, thermometer, water probe) and/or dissolved oxygen levels. Additionally,
sample collection shall include collection of free phase product in a well provided the collection of free
product is not part of a free product recovery test (component #13). Analytical cost (component #11)
is not included in this rate. This rate does not apply to more than three downgradient ground water
samples collected for field screening (component #6). The three downgradient ground water samples
will be sent to a certified laboratory. One collection event shall be allowed for each media collected at
a
well or receptor e.g., one ground-water and one vapor sample, both from the basement of a building
adjacent to a UST site, shall be considered two separate sample collection events. Sampling ground
water in a monitoring well for dissolved oxygen and obtaining a ground water sample for BTEX, MtBE,
and RCRA Metals shall all be one sample collection event. Air or vapor samples must be collected in a
metal cylinder. The soil sample collection fee is included in the boring, screening, or well rate.
II.
ANALYSES includes all personnel, sample containers, coolers, ice, equipment for analysis by a S.C.
certified laboratory and reporting of the results using appropriate chain of custody, field notes, and
certificates of analysis in accordance with the latest RBCA, Analytical Methodology for Petroleum
Releases document, and SW-846. Chain of custody and field notes should be included with the final
report. The eight (8) oxygenates are: ethanol, ethyl tert-butyl alcohol (ETBA), ethyl tert-butyl ether
(ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), diisopropyl ether (DIPE), tert-butyl formate (TBF), tert-butyl
alcohol (TBA), and tert-amyl alcohol (TAA). The eight (8) RCRA metals are: arsenic, barium, cadmium,
chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver. Rush analysis will be 24 hour analysis by the laboratory,
with written results provided to the UST project manager within 48 hours of sample collection.
Mobilization may not be added to this task.
May 15, 2001
Page 6
12.
AqUIFER CHARAC1’ERIZATION
includes
all personnel, equipment, and materials to complete a
pumping test or slug test, record and report all data, reduce the data, and summarize it on the
Department’s pumping test or slug test report forms. Mobilization may be added to this task when not
combined with other tasks (see #4b above).
13.
FREE PRODUCT RECOVERY RATE TEST includes all personnel, equipment, and materials to perform
a free product recovery, bail down, or bail out test, calculate the free product recharge rate and true
thickness, summarize the data in a tabular format, and discuss the results in a succinct narrative.
Mobilization may be added to this task where appropriate (see #4b above).
14.
FATE/TRANSPORT MODELING includes ~ personnel, equipment or materials, and computer software
to complete fate and transport modeling of petroleum in soil, ground water, and /or vapors using
mathematical or computer models, as appropriate. Mobilization may not be added to this task.
A)
A
mathematical model is one where calculations are completed using either a hand calculator or
a computer spreadsheet and the final output solely results in a set of calculated numbers e.g.,
Domenico, MODFLOW, or AT I 23D output in tabular data or a computer spread sheet.
Calculation of several chemicals of concern using the same model e.g., Domenico shall be
considered one model. Calculation for several exposure pathways in the same medium e.g.,
ground-water, shall be considered one model since only a distance to each exposure point would
change.
B)
A
computer model includes any computer software and the calibration of the model to the
current site conditions which uses an iterative or complex approach to solve mathematical
expressions, and produces computer generated input and output data summaries, figures, or
charts to interpret fate and transport of chemicals of concern through a medium e.g., DSS,
BIOPLUME II, BIOSCREEN. Natural attenuation measurements and calibration to existing
analytical data must be included as part ofthe modeling effort. A separate model will be allowed
for each medium if a separate model was used e.g., using AT 123D, SESOIL and Box models
for ground water, soil, and vapors would be three models; using the RBCA tool kit that
calculates soil, ground water, and vapors with a single entry of field or laboratory data would
be one computer model. Calculation of several chemicals of concern and! or calculation for
several exposure pathways in the same medium e.g., ground-water, will be considered one
computer model.
IS.
TIER I RiSK EVALUATION includes all personnel, equipment, and materials necessary to evaluate the
site data and potential receptors in order to determine the most appropriate action in accordance with the
Department’s Risk-Based Corrective Action Guidance. Either a.Tier I OR a Tier
II
evaluation (not both
for the same report) shall be requested. Mobilization may not be added to this task.
TIER
II
RISK EVALUATION includes all personnel, equipment, and materials necessary to evaluate the
site data and potential receptors in order to determine the most appropriate action for the site in
accordance with the Department’s Risk-Based Corrective Action Guidance. Tier 11 evaluation includes
all Tier I evaluation tasks. Mobilization may not be added to this task.
May 15, 2001
Page 7
16.
SUBSEQUENT SURVEY includes all personnel, equipment, and materials necessary for a person to
determine the location and elevation of screening points and permanent wells to be included in an existing
comprehensive survey. A subsequent survey may be performed by a South Carolina certified surveyor
or a person trained in surveying procedures. Mobilization may be added to this task, where appropriate
(see #4b above).
17.
DISPOSAL includes all personnel, equipment, and materials to obtain signatures on manifests, load,
transport, and treat wastewater, free product, and soil. Qnly one personnel mobilization may be added
for this task. All disposal tasks (soil and ground water) shall occur at the same time.
18.
MISCELLANEOUS includes all tasks or items not included in any of the defined components which shall
be needed on a site-specific basis. Actual expenditures documented by vendor receipts or employee rate
without fringes must be submitted with the invoice, e.g., laboratory invoice for special analytical method,
rental contract for free product recovery equipment. All costs for the environmental contractor or any
subcontractor must be preapproved. Items will receive no markup or handling fee other than item 19.
If a geologist or technician will oversee a task and is not associated with the firm or company
conducting the task, a personnel mobilization for the geologist or technician may be allowed.
19.
ASSESSMENT REPORT/PROJECT COORDINATION includes all personnel, equipment, and material
cost to complete a report documenting the data, results, and conclusions of all components completed
during that phase of work. Also includes all personnel oversight and miscellaneous costs associated with
procuring subcontractors, coordination of the project to include disposal of generated waste and off site
access, verification of work, communication with any parties, invoicing, and coordination with the
department. The sum of all components may be multiplied by this percentage and then addedto the total
for a Tier II Assessment Report, Monitoring Report, or Well Abandonment Report. Any report that
interprets the geology or ground water flow will be signed and sealed by a professional geologist or
engineer licensed to practice in the state of South Carolina. Any report must be submitted by a DHEC
certified site rehabilitation contractor. Mobilization may not be added to this task. If the UST owner or
operator and the site environmental contractor have a familial or financial relationship, this item shall not
be allowed.
ATTACHMENT
9
EXCAVATION/TRANSPORTATION/DISPOSAL/BACKFILL
COSTS
Site
Excavation
Transportation
Disposal
E+T+D
Backfill
1
$ 20.00
$ 15.00
$ 15.00
$
50.00
$ 15.00
2
$ 16.85
$
7.63
$ 27.55
$
52.03
$ 11.79
3
$ 12.00
$ 10.00
$ 22.50
$
44.50
$ 16.00
4
$ 11.24
$ 11.24
$ 35.21
$
57.69
$ 14.94
5
$ 16.82
$ 13.42
$ 27.00
$
57.24
$
9.00
6
$
4.80
$ 22.00
$ 27.00
$
53.80
$ 15.00
7
$
9.75
$ 10.00
$ 22.25
$
42.00
8
$
51.00
$ 18.50
9
$
49.86
$ 15.71
10
$
50.00
$ 18.00
11
$ 10.00
$ 15.00
$ 21.00
$
46.00
$ 18.00
12
$ 15.00
$
8.00
$ 12.00
$
35.00
13
$
2.75
$ 18.50
$ 20.00
$
41.25
$ 19.90
14
$ 11.00
$
4.29
$
8.60
$
23.89
$
6.90
15
$ 12.00
$ 13.00
$ 25.00
$
50.00
$ 26.00
16
$ 15.00
$ 12.00
$ 21.00
$
48.00
$ 15.00
17
$
36.20
18
$
8.00
$ 22.00
$ 27.00
$
57.00
$ 15.00
19
$ 10.86
$ 14.00
$ 24.50
$
49.36
$ 22.50
20
$ 10.00
$ 10.00
$ 32.00
$
52.00
$ 16.00
21
$ 16.00
$ 10.00
$ 12.00
$
38.00
$ 17.50
22
$ 10.00
$ 10.00
$ 32.00
$
52.00
$ 16.00
23
$
5.00
$ 10.00
$ 25.00
$
40.00
$ 10.00
24
$ 20.00
$ 15.00
$ 25.00
$
60.00
$ 25.60
25
$ 25.20
$
6.00
$ 21.60
$
52.80
$
7.20
TOTAL
$ 262.27
$ 257.08
$ 483.21
$1,189.62
$ 349.54
Average
$ 12.49
$ 12.24
$ 23.01
$
47.58
$ 15.89
STDDEV
$
8.22
$
4.38
$ 76.07
ATTACHMENT
10
Laboratory Analysis
Propsed
Chemical
Note LAB 1
LAB 2
LAB 3
LAB
4
LAB 5
Average
Rate
Arsenic TCLP Soil
1 $ 112,00 $
70.00 $
85.75 $ 115.75 $ 85.00
$
93.70
$ 115.75
ArsenicTotal Soil
2 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
23.25 $
43.50 $ 40.00
$
31.15
$ 43.50
Arsenic Water
.
3 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
23.25 $
33.50 $ 34.00
$
27.95
$
34.00
Barium TCLP Soil
1 $ 112.00 $
70.00 $
78.00 $ 107.75 $ 72.00
$
87.95
$ 112.00
BariumTotal Soil
2 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
15.50 $
35.50 $ 27.00
$
25.40
$ 35.50
Barium Water
3 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
15.50 $
25.50 $ 22.00
$
22.40
$
25.50
BETX Soilwith MTBE (EPA 8260)
4 $
90.00 $
82.00 $
91.25 $
87.00 $ 70.00
$
84.05
$ 91.25
BETX - Water with MTBE (EPA 8260)
4 $
90.00 $
70.00 $
85.00 $
87.00 $ 70.00
$
80.40
$ 90.00
BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand)
$
24.00 $
18.00 $
42.00 $
36.00 $ 28.00
$
29.60
$ 42.00
Cadmium TCLP Soil
1 $ 112.00 $
70.00 $
85.75 $ 115.75 $ 85.00
$
93.70
$ 115.75
Cadmium Total Soil
2 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
23.25 $
43.50 $ 40.00
$
31.15
$ 43.50
Cadmium Water
3 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
23.25 $
33.50 $ 34.00
$
27.95
$ 34.00
Chromium TCLP Soil
1 $ 112.00 $
70.00 $
78.00 $ 107.75 $ 72.00
$
87.95
$
112.00
Chromium Total Soil
2 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
15.50 $
35.50 $ 27.00
$
25.40
$ 35.50
Chromium Water
3 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
15.50 $
25.50 $ 22.00
$
22.40
$ 25.50
Corrosivity
$
12.00 $
10.00 $
13.00 $
15.50 $ 20.00
$
14.10
$ 20.00
Cyanide TCLP Soil
I $ 130.00 $
80.00 $
101.00 $ 123.00 $ 95.00
$
105.80
$ 130.00
CyanideTotal Soil
$
30.00 $
35.00 $
38.50 $
30.75 $ 35.00
$
33.85
$ 38.50
CyanideWater
$
30.00 $
35.00 $
38.50 $
30.75 $ 35.00
$
33.85
$ 38.50
Flash Point or Ignitability Analysis EPA 1010
$
30.00 $
25.00 $
31.75 $
46.00 $ 30.00
$
32.55
$ 46.00
FOC (Fraction Organic Carbon)
$
24.00 -
$
24.25 $
51.25 $ 50.00
$
37.38
$
51.25
Fat, Oil, & Grease (FOG)
$
36.00 $
50.00 $
100.00 $
61.50.. $ 50.00
$
59.50
$ 100.00
IronTCLP Soil
.
1 $ 112.00 $
70.00 $
78.00 $ 107.75 $ 72.00
$
87.95
$
112.00
IronWater
3 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
15.50 $
25.50 $ 22.00
$
22.40
$ 25.50
Lead TCLP Soil
1 $ 112.00 $
70.00 $
86.00 $ 115.75 $ 85.00
$
93.75
$ 115.75
Lead Total Soil
2 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
23.50 $
43.50 $ 40.00
$
31.20
$ 43.50
LeadWater
3 $
24.00 $
25.00 $
23.50 $
33.50 $ 35.00
$
28.20
$ 35.00
LUST (Priority) Pollutants Soil
5 $ 660.00 $ 710.00 $ 656.25 $ 711.75 $ 72~.00
$
692.60
$ 725.00
MercuryTCLP Soil
1 $ 130.00 $
70.00 $
86.00 $ 115.75 $ 85.00
$
97.35
$ 130.00
Mercury Total Soil
.
$
30.00 $
25.00 $
23.50 $
23.50 $ 25.00
$
25.40
$ 30.00
Mercury
Water
$
30.00 $
25.00 $
23.50 $
23.50 $ 25.00
$
25.40
$ 30.00
Metals TCLP Soil (a
combination of all metals) RCRA
6 $ 226.00 $ 175.00 $
178.50 $ 240.75 $ 217.00
$
207.45
$ 240.75
Metals Total Soil (a combination of all metals) RCRA
6 $ 126.00 $ 130.00 $
116.00 $ 148.50 $ 172.00
$
138.50
$ 172.00
Metals Water (a combination of all metals) RCRA
6 $ 126.00 $ 130.00 $
116.00 $ 148.50 $ 167.00
$
137.50
$ 167.00
Laboratory Analysis
$
18.25
$
35.00
$
21.75
$
35.00
$
255.00
$
255.00
$
255.00
$
12.50
$
10.00
$
11.50
$
12.50
$
105.00
$
105.00
$
105.00
$
350.00
.
$
350.00
$
350.00
$
140.00
$ 150.00
$
145.00
$
150.00
Chemical
Note
LAB
1
LAB
2
LAB 3
LAB 4
LAB
5
Averaqe
Propsed
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Organic Carbon (ASTM-D 2974-87)
Oxygen (Dissolved)
Paint Filter (Free Liquids)
PCB
I
Pesticides (combination)
PCBs
Pesticides
pH
phenol
Poly Nuclear Aromatics PNA, or PAH SOIL EPA 8270
Poly Nuclear Aromatics PNA, or PAH WATER EPA 8270
Reactivity
Selenium TCLP Soil
Selenium Total Soil
Selenium Water
SilverTCLP Soil
SilverTotal Soil
SilverWater
SVOC
-
Soil (Semi Volatile Organic Compounds)
SVOC
-
Water (Semi Volatile Organic Compounds)
TKN (Total Kjeldahl)
“nitrogen”
TOC (Total Organic Carbon) EPA 9060A
TPI-I (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons)
VOC (Volatile Organic Compound)
-
Soil (Non-Aqueous)
VOC
(Volatile Organic Compound)
-
Water
Waste Characterization (Landfill Analysis)
Geo-Technical
Bulk Density ASTM 04292
1
02937
Ex-Situ Hydraulic Conductivity
I
Permeability
Moisture Content ASTM 02216-90 /
D4643-87
Porosity
Rock Hydraulic Conductivity Ex-situ
Sieve! Particle Size Analysis ASTM D422-63 / 01140-54
Soil Classification ASTM 02488-90/ D2487-90
10.00
240.00
100.00
140.00
10.00
25.00
210.00
210.00
65.00
70.00
25.00
25.00
70.00
25.00
25.00
350.00
350.00
35.00
25.00
160.00
192.00
180.00
$
24.25
$
13.00
$
13.00
$
212.75
$
90.25
$
122.50
$
13.00
$
39.75
$ 126.00
$
126.00
$
78.00
$
86.00
$
23.50
$
15.50
$
78.00
$
15.50
$
15.50
$
281.25
$
281.25
$
38.50
$
33.00
$
87.50
$
170.00
$
154.50
$
36.00
$
15.50
$
225.00
$
92.25
$
138.25
$
15.50
$
36.00
$
138.25
$
138.25
$
66.75
$ 115.75
$
43.50
$
25.50
$
107.75
~$
35.50
$
25.50
$
307.50
$
307.50
$
56.00
$
36.00
$
102.50
$
179.50
$
179.25
$
24.00
$
24.00
$
12.00
$ 180.00
$ 120.00
$ 120.00
$
12.00
$
30.00
7 $ 150.00
7 $
150.00
$
60.00
I $ 112.00
2
$
24.00
3 $
24.00
1 $ 112.00
2 $
24.00
3 $
24.00
$ 300.00
$
300.00
$
48.00
$
30.00
8 $ 100.00
$ 180.00
$ 180.00
9
$
12.00
$
$
12.00
$
$
$
$
50.00
$
20.00
$
15.00
$
250.00
$
150.00
$
175.00
$
15.00
$
35.00
$
135.00
$
135.00
$
70.00
$
85.00
$
40.00
$
35.00
$
72.00
$
27.00
$
22.00
$
325.00
$
325.00
$
40.00
$
30.00
$
160.00
$
150.00
$
150.00
$
32.75
$
23.25
$
13.10
$
221.55
$
110.50
$
139.15
$
13.10
$
33.15
$
151.85
$
151.85
$
67.95
$
93.75
$
31.20
$
25.00
$
87.95
$
25.40
$
22.40
$
312.75
$
312.75
$
43.50
$
30.80
$
122.00
$
174.30
$
168.75
$
50.00
$
36.00
$
15.50
$
250.00
$
150.00
$
175.00
$
15.50
$
39.75
$
210.00
$
210.00
$ 78.00
$
115.75
$
43.50
$
35.00
$
112.00
$
35.50
$
25.50
$
350.00
$
350.00
$
56.00
$ 36.00
$
160.00
$ 192.00
$ 180.00
Laboratory Analysis
Propsed
Chemical
Note LAB 1
LAB 2
LAB 3
LAB 4
LAB 5
Average
Rate
Dry Weight Reporting (per sample)
10
$
10.00 $
12.50 $
8.00 $ 10.00
$
10.13
$ 12.50
Turnaround Surcharge
11
4Day
50
25
25
25
31
50
3Day
50
100
50
50
50
60
100
2Day
100
100
100
75
100
95
100
1Day
100
100
125
100
200
125
200
Note 1: Price incudes preparation at the rate of:
$ 100.00
$
62.50 $
92.25 $ 60.00
$
78.69
$
100.00
Note 2: Price incudes preparation at the rate of:
$
12.00
$
20.00 $ 15,00
$
15.67
$ 20.00
Note 3: Price incudes preparation at the rate of:
$
12.00
$
10.00 $ 10.00
$
10.67
$ 12.00
Note 4: BTEX by method 8021 approved but not listed
Note 5: Volatiles, semivolitiles, pesticides and PCB5
Note 6: Seven LUST Metals including all Preps
Note 7: PNAs by 8310 approved by not listed
Note 8: TPH includes GRO and DRO
Note 9: Specific analyses not defined
Note 10: Only applys to soil samples
Note 11: Normal TAT is 5-7 work days
ATTACHMENT
11
TCLP IN SOILS
LAB
PREP
USED IN AMOUNT USED IN
CONSTITUENT
MAX
FEE
RULE ALLOWED RULE
Arsenic
$93.70
:
$78.69
$79.00
$15.01
$16.00
Barium
$87.95
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
Cadmium
$93.70
$78.69
$79.00
$15.01
$16.00
Chromium
$87.95
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
Cyanide
$105.80
$78.69
$79.00
$27.11
$28.00
Iron
$87.95
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
Lead
$93.75
$78.69
$79.00
$15.06
$16.00
Mercury
$76.69
$79.00
$18.66
$19.00
Selenium
$93.75
$78.69
$79.00
$15.06
$16.00
Silver
$87.95
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
TOTAL IN SOILS
LAB
PREP
USED IN AMOUNT USED IN
CONSTITUENT
MAX
FEE
RULE
ALLOWED RULE
Arsenic
$31.15
:
$15.67
$16.00
$15.48
$16.00
Barium
$25.40
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
Cadmium
$31.15 —
$15.67
$16.00
$15.48
$16.00
Chromium
$25.40 —
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
Cyanide
$33.85
$0.00
$33.85
$34.00
Iron*
$31.15
$15.67
$16.00
$15.48
$16.00
Lead
$31.20
$15.67
$16.00
$15.53
$16.00
Mercury
$25.40 —
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
Selenium
$31.20
$15.67
$16.00
$15.53
$16.00
Silver
$25.40
—
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
TOTAL IN WATER
LAB
PREP
USED IN AMOUNT USED IN
CONSTITUENT
MAX
FEE
RULE
ALLOWED RULE
Arsenic
$27.95
:
$10.67
$11.00
$17.28
$18.00
Barium
$22.40
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
Cadmium
$27.95
$10.67
$11.00
$17.28
$18.00
Chromium
$22.40
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
Cyanide
$33.85
—
$0.00
$0.00
$33.85
$34.00
Iron
$22.40 —
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
Lead
$28.20 —
$10.67
$11.00
$17.53
$18.00
Mercury
$25.40 —
$0.00
$0.00
$25.40
$26.00
Selenium
$25.00
$10.67
$11.00
$14.33
$15.00
Silver
$22.40
—
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
iron Total Soil assumed from other metals
ATTACHMENT
12
AVERAGE s/HOUR COST
PERSONNEL
SITE
20&45 DAY
HOURS
OVERSIGHT
HOURS
1
-$8,500.00
$7,200.00
100
2
$12360.00
138
$4,550.00
63
3
$12,342.00
164.5
$6,652.50
120.5
4
$3,780.00
54
$2,250.00
25
5
$12,059.00
148.4
6
$5,122.75
64.75
$4,198.15
65
7
$2,685.00
43
$975.00
13
8
$1,250.00
25
$1,700.00
34
9
$3,200.00
42
$2,287.50
30.5
10
$3,722.70
50
$2,870.00
41
11
$7,257.00
90
$13,167.00
151
12
-$6,625.00
-$6,270.00
:
13
$8,377.50
103.5
$7,600.00
80
14
$6,320.00
78
$800.00
10
15
$2,195.00
35
16
$4,044.75
48.5
17
$3,800.00
53
$8,236.00
96
18
$3,439.50
45.5
19
$2,205.75
29.5
5740.00
9
TOTAL
$79,035.95
1212.65
$56,956.15
838
AVERAGE $4,649.17
71.33235
$3,797.08
55.86667
AVERAGE 5/HOUR =
$65.18
AVERAGE 5/HOUR =
$67.97
II
INCLUDES UST REMOVAL OVERSIGHT
AMOUNTS NOT INCLUDED
(# OF HOURS UNKNOWN)
ATTACHMENT
13
(0
CO~
0
(0
NJ
CD
0(4
(~
0)
C.)
(4
0
(4
0)
0)
a
-s
0
Os
0)
N)
(0
-S
a
0)
-s
0)
M
~fl~Oocoa
O
JIth
CO
A.
CO
‘.4
~J
Q)
o
0)
(0
(0
(0
0)
0)
b.
CD
~
th
Ci
-S
Q)
~
Q)
(j
0)
N.)
M
a
01
-J
PP~PsnP9Pth99thP9pppppPlpPppsnpsn..t.ppp
o
010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
°Ojf00000000ooooo
m
-1
I
0
a
-u-S
0)0
ON)
z
rn-
1
rm
—1w
6)
-1
0
z
CD
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
)
COUNTY OF SANGAMON)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached Errata Sheet and Prefiled
Testimony ofDoug Clay. Hernando Albarracin, Doug Oakley. Brian Bauer
and
Harry Chappel on
behalfofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Agency upon the person to whom it is directed, by
placing a copy in an envelope addressed to:
Dorothy M. 6mm, Clerk
Marie Tipsord, Hearing Officer
Pollution Control Board
Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph St., Ste 11-500
100W. Randolph, Ste 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(Overnight Mail)
(Overnight Mail)
See Attached Service List
and
mailing it from Springfield, Illinois on
____________________
S~SC~EDAND SWORN TO BEFO~ME
thisC~ayof~’)1O~fCh
~
AW~~~
,2oo51
Notary Public
SMYNOT4fl~~~COMMI$S,O,~BOEUPJER
STATE
OF
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED &ThftYnstp~t
I$~3~f
H~rrvR. Walton
Interested
Party
2510 Brooks Drive
Decatur
IL 52521
217-428-6782
Harry
Walton
Terracpn
Interested Party
870 40th Avenue
BettendorfIA 52722
(563)0702 355-
Brian Porter
Illinois OeDartment of Natural
Springfield
~ources
One Natural Resources Way
IL 72702-
217/7821809
Interested
Party
1271
217/524-9640
Jonathan Furr, General Counsel
Wendler Engineering
Services.
Inc.
Interested
Party
1770 West State
Street
SycamoreIL
60178
815-895-5008
Gien Lee, Manager
Great Lakes Analytical
interested Party
1380 Busch Parkway
BuffaloIL
60089Grove 7766(847)
808-
A.) Pavlick
CSD Environmental Services. Inc
Interested
Party
2220 Yale Boulevard
SpringfieldIL
62703
217-522-4085
)oseph W. Truesdale, Pt.
McGuircWoods LLP
Interested party
77
W. Wacker Drive
ChicagoIL 60601
312-849-8249
David L. Rieser, Partner
Clayton Group services Inc
Downers
Interested Party
3140 Finley Road
GroveIL
60515
630.795.3207
Monte Nienkerk
POC laboratories
Interested Party
2231 W. Altorfer Dr.
Peoriaii
61615
309-692-9688
Kurt Stepping, Director of Client Services
Atweu-Kjcks. Inc.
940 East DiehI Road
Naperville
Interested Party
Sute 100
IL 60563
630 5710800
Thomas M. Guist, PE, Team Leader
CW3M
Company. Inc.
Interested Party
701 South Grand Ave. West
SpringAcidIL
62704
217-522-8001
Jeff Wienhoff
United Science Industries. Inc.
Interested Party
6295 East Illinois Hwy 15
woodlawnIL 62898
618-735-2411
Dan King, Team Leader
Environmental Consulting &
EngineerIng. 1
551 Roosevelt Road
Glenn Ellyn
Interested Party
#309
IL 60137
Richard Andros, P.E.
MACTEC Engineering & Consultina.
jflc~
8901 N. Industrial Road
Peoria
Interested Party
XL 61615
Terrence W. Dixon, PG.
Illinois OeDartment of
Transoortatign
2300 Dirksen Parkway
Springfield
Interested Party
IL 62764
Steven Gobelman
SEECO Environmental Services. Inc.
Interested Party
7350 Duvon Drive
TinleyIL
60477Park
Colfln W. Gray
Herlacher Angleton Associates. tIC
522 BelIe Street
Alton
Interested Party
IL 62002
Jennifer Goodman
United
Envfronmental
Consultants.
119 East Palatin Road
Palatine
In~L
Suite 101
IL 60067
Interested Party
George F. Moncek
McGuire Woods LLP
77 W. Wacker
Chicago
Interested
Party
Suite 4400
IL 60601
David Rieser
Greensfelder. Hemker & Gale
10 S. Broadway
St. Louis
314-241-9090
Interested Party
Suite 2000
MO 63104
Tins Archer, Attorney
Midwest Ent,ineering Services. Inc.
Oak Forest
4243 W. 166th Street
708-535-9981
Interested Party
IL 60452
Erin Cuilcy, Env. Department Manager
American Environmental Corn.
3700 W. Grand Ave., Suite A
SprIngfield
(217) 585-
interested Party
IL 62707
9517
Ken Miller, Regional Manager
Applied Environmental Sciuttons.
Centrafla
Inc.
P0 Box 1225
IL 62801
6185335953
Interested Party
Russ Goodlel, Project Manager
5ecpr Internatign~I.Inc.
400 Bruns Lane
Springfield
interested Party
IL 62702
Daniel
3.
Goodwh,
Hodqe
InterestedDwyerPartyZeman
Post3150OfficeRolandBoxAvenue5776
5776SpringfieldIL
62705-
217/523-4948217/523-4900
Thomas G. Safley
Sidley Austin Brown & Wood
Bank One Plaza
Chicago
112/853-7000
Interested Party
10 South Dearborn Street
IL 60603
312/953-7036
Wilfiam G. Dickett
Karpagnis & White. Ltd.
414 North Orleans Street
Chicago
312/836-1177
Interested
Party
Suite
810
IL 60610
312/836-9083
Barbara Maget
Illinois Petroleum Marketers
Association
112 West Cook Street
SpringfieldIL
62704
217/793-1858
Interested Party
8111 Fleischi
Woodlawn
United Science
Industries.
Inc.
P.O.
Box 360
IL 52898-
618/735-241.1
Interested
Party
6295 East
Illinois Highway 15
0360
618/7352907
Joe Kelly, PE
Illinois Environmental Requlptorv
Springfield
217/523-4942
~LQs&Q
3150 Roland Avenue
IL 62703
217/523-4948
Interested Party
Robert A. Messina, General Counsel
Carison Environmental. Inc.
65 E. Wacker Place
Chicago
Interested Party
Suite 1500
IL 60601
Kenneth James
Chemical
Industry
Council of IllinoIs
9801
W. F-hgg~nsRoad
Roseniont
Interested
Party
Suite
480
IL 60018
Lisa
Frede
RpDDS
Engineering & ADDIICd
Springfield
217/787-2118
82t South OurIdn Drive
Science
______
Interested
Party
P.O.
Box
7349
7349IL
62191-
217/787-6641
Michael W. Rapps
Office of the AttQrrley General
Environmental Bureau
Chicago
312/814-2550
Interested Party
188 West R~ndoIph,20th Floor IL 60601
31.2/614-2341
Joel). Stcrnsteln, Assistant Attorney Genera
Matthew
3.
Dunn, Division Chief
Herlacher Angleton Associates. LLC
Waterloo
618/935-2262
Interested Party
8731 Bluff Road
IL 62298
618/935-2694
Torn Herlacher, PE., Principal Engineer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 W. Randolph St.
Chicago
3128143956
Interested Part?
Suite 1 1~500
IL 60601
Dorothy ft Gum,, Clerk of the Board
Marie Tipsord, Hearing Officer
Huff & Huff. Inc.
512 West Burlington Avenue
LaGrange
Interested Party
Suite 100
IL 60525
james E. Huff, P.E.
Black & Veatch
101 North Wacker Drive
Chicago
Interested Party
Suite 1100
IL 60606
Scott Anderson
MarlinInterestedEnvironmental.Party
Inc.
1000 West Spring Street
SouthIL
60177ElgIn
847-468-8855
Melanie Lopkcolo, Office Manager
