RECE
WED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
MAR
a
E~2004
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution
Control Board
IN THE MATTER OF:
PROPOSED AIVIENDMENTS TO REGULATION OF
PETROLEUM LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE
TANKS
(35 ILL.ADM.CODE 732)
R04-22
NOTICE
Dorothy Gunn,
Clerk
Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph,
Ste.
11-500
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
(overnight Mail)
See Attached Service List
Marie Tipsord,
Hearing Officer
Pollution Control Board
James
R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Ste 11-500
Chicago,
Illinois 60601
(Overnight Mail)
PLEASE
TAKE
NOTICE
that
I have today filed with the Office of
the Clerk of the Pollution Control Board the Errata Sheet and Preflied
T~sti
monv
of Doug Clay,
Hernando Albarracin,
Doug Oakley, Brian Bauer and Harry Chappei
of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
a copy of which is
herewith served upon you.
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
By:
Kyle Roi~nger
Assistant Counsel
DATE:
March
05,
2004
Agency File
#:
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Ave. East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield,
IL 62794-9276
(Rulemaking-Land)
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
)
R04-22
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE
)
TANKS
(35
ILL. ADM. CODE 732)
)
ILLiNOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S FIRST ERRATA SHEET
TO ITS PROPOSAL FOR THE AMENDMENT OF
35
ILL. ADM. CODE 732
NOW COMES the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois EPA”), by
and through its attorneys Kyle Rominger and Gina Roccaforte, and submits this First
Errata Sheet to its proposal forthe amendment of35 Ill. Adm.
Code 732.
The Illinois
EPA proposes the following amendments to the text ofthe rules submitted in its proposal
to the Board dated January
1, 2004:
1.
Amend Section
732.110(e) to thefollowing to replace
“Section 732.703(d)” with
“Section
732.703(c) or (d)” in thefirst sentence.
A form addressing site ownership is not
necessaryfor sites subject to Section
732.703(c).
e)
Except in the case ofsites subject to Section 732.703(c) or (d) ofthis Part,
reports documenting the completion ofcorrective action at a site must
contain a form addressing site ownership.
At a minimum, the form shall
identify the land use limitations proposed for the site, if land use
limitations are proposed; the site’s common address, legal description, and
real estate tax/parcel index number; and the names and addresses ofall
title holders ofrecord ofthe site or any portion of the site.
The form shall
also contain the following certification, by original signature, ofall title
holders ofrecord ofthe site or any portion ofthe site, or the agent(s) of
suchperson(s):
I hereby affirm that
I have reviewed the attached report entitled
and dated
,
and that I accept the terms and
conditions set forth therein, including any land use limitations, that
apply to property I own.
I further affirm that I have no objection to
the recording of a No Further Remediation Letter containing the
terms and conditions identified in the report upon the property I
own.
2.
Amend Section
732.202(h)(1)(B) to thefollowing to
add a sentence at the end that
allows the Illinois EPA to require more than two excavationfloor samplesfrom below
undergroundstorage tanks with a volume of 15,000 gallons or more.
The prescribed two
floor samples may be inadequate to determine whether the soil belowsuch larger tanks
exceeds the applicable remediation objectives.
B)
Two samples shall be collected from the excavation floor
below eachUST with a volume of 1.000 gallons or more.
One sample shall be collected from the excavation floor
below eachUST with a volume ofless than
1,000
gallons.
The samples shall be collected from locations
representative ofsoil that
is the most contaminated as a
result ofthe release.
Ifareas ofcontamination cannot be
identified, the samples shall be collected from below each
end ofthe UST if its volume is
1,000
gallons ormore, and
from below the center ofthe UST if its volume
is less than
1.000 gallons.
The Agency may require the collection of
more than two samples from the excavation floor below
USTs with a volume of 15,000
gallon or more.
3.
Amend Section
732.202(h)(1)(D) to thefollowing to allow the Illinois EPA to require
more than two backfill samplesfor larger undergroundstorage tanks, and, for the
purposes ofconsistency,
to mirror the tanksize delineations in Section
732.202(h)(1)(B).
D)
Ifbackfill is returned to the excavation, one representative
sample ofthe backfill shall be collected for each UST with
a volume ofless than
1,000 gallons and two representative
samples ofthe backfill shall be collected for eachUST with
a volume of 1,000 gallons ormore.
The Agency may
require the collection ofmore than two representative
samples ofthe backfill for each UST with a volume of
15.000 gallon ormore.
4.
Amend Section
732.203(d) to thefollowing by removing
“a copy ofthe eligibility and
deductibility determination ofthe OSFMand”from the second sentence so an owner’s or
operator’s ability to submit afree product removal budgetplan in a
timely manner is not
dependantupon obtaining an eligibility and deductibility determinationfrom the OSFM
d)
Any owner or operator intending to seek payment from the Fund shall,
prior to conducting free product removal activities more than
45
days after
the confirmation ofthe presence offree product, submit to the Agency a
free product removal budgetplan with the corresponding free product
removal plan.
The budget plan shall include, but shall not be limited to,
an estimate of all costs
associated with the development, implementation,
and completion ofthe free product removal plan, excluding handling
2
charges.
The budget plan should be consistent with the eligible and
ineligible costs listed in Sections
732.605
and 732.606 ofthis Part and the
maximum payment amounts set forth in Subpart H ofthis Part.
As
part of
the budget plan the Agency may require a comparison between the costs
ofthe proposed method offree product removal and other methods of free
product removal.
5.
Amend Section
732.3070)(5)(C)(z) to thefollowing by adding
“most stringent”prior
to
“objectives or detection levels” to ensureproperpractical quantitation limits in
sample analyses.
i)
The methodology shall have a practical quantitation
limit (PQL) at or below the most stringent
objectives or detection levels set forth in 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 742 or as set for mixtures or
degradation products as provided in Section
732.3 10 of this Part; and
6.
Amend Section 732.6010) to thefollowing to
remove references to budgets plans and
budgetplan amendments because those documents must be subm ittedprior to the
issuance ofa No Further Remediation Letter.
j)
All applications for payment ofcorrective action costs shall be submitted
no later than one year after the date the Agency issues a No Further
Remediation Letterpursuant to
Subpart G ofthis Part.
For releases for
which the Agency issued a No Further Remediation Letter prior to the
effective date ofthis subsection
(j),
all
applications for payment shall be
submitted no later than one year after the effective date ofthis subsection
7.
Amend Section
732.605(a)(18) (renumbered to Section
732.605(a)(1 7)) and Section
732.840(b) by replacing the addition of “$10,000 per site” with the addition of “$10,000
per occurrence.”
8.
Amend Section
732. 606(kk)
to thefollowing to add
“costs associatedwith the
replacement of concrete, asphalt,
orpaving in accordance with Section 732.605(a)(17) of
this Part,
“.
Some owners and operators may not replace concrete, asphalt,
orpaving
until after they receive a No Further Remediation Letter.
kk)
Costs incurred for additional remediation after receipt ofa No Further
Remediation Letter for the occurrence forwhich the No Further
Remediation Letter was received, except costs incurred forMTBE
remediation pursuant to
Section 732.31 0(i)(2) ofthis Part, costs associated
with the replacement of concrete, asphalt, or paving in accordance with
Section 732.605(a)(17) ofthis Part, monitoring well abandonment costs,
county recorder or registraroftitles fees forrecording the No Further
3
Remediation Letter, and costs associated with seeking payment from the
Fund
9.
Amend Section
732. 606(ccc) to thefollowing to remove
“or sample analysis.”
The
Illinois EPApaysfor the analysis ofa second sample when thefirst sample cannot be
used due to improper collection, transportation, or analysis.
ccc)
Costs associated with
sample collection or transportation required as a
result ofimproperly collected, transported, or analyzed laboratory
samples
10.
Delete theproposed amendment to Section 732.608(b).
11.
Amend Section
732.820 to
thefollowing to provide maximumpayment amountsfor
direct-pushplatform drilling conductedfor injection purposes
(e.g.,for the injection of
oxygen releasing compounds aspart ofan alternative technology) and for recovery well
installation, and to
increase the maximumpayment amountfor well abandonment.
Section 732.820
Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Payment for costs associated with drilling, well installation, and well abandonment shall
not exceed the amounts set
forth in this Section.
a)
Payment for costs
associated with each round ofdrilling shall not exceed
the following amounts.
Such costs
shall include, but not be limited to.
those
associated with mobilization, drilling labor, decontamination, and
drilling forthe purposes ofsoil
sampling or well installation.
Type ofDrilling
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
greater of $23.00 per foot or $1,500.00
Direct-push platform
-
for sampling or other
greater of $18.00 per foot or $1,200.00
non-injection purposes
-
for injection purposes
greater of$15.00 per foot or $1,200.00
b)
Payment for costs associated with the installation ofmonitoring wells,
excluding drilling, shall not exceed the following amounts.
Such costs
shall include, but not be limited to, those associated with well construction
and development.
Type ofBorehole
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
$16.50/foot (well length)
Direct-push platform
$1 2.50/foot (well length)
c)
Payment for costs
associated with the installation ofrecovery wells,
excluding drilling, shall not exceed the following amounts.
Such costs
4
shall include, but not be limited to,
those associated with well construction
and development.
Well_Diameter
T~1Iaximum
Total Amount
4 or
6 inches
$25.00/foot (well length)
8 inches or greater
$41.00/foot (well length)
d)
Payment for costs associated with the abandonment ofmonitoring wells
shall not exceed $10.00 per foot ofwell length.
12.
Amend Section
732.865 by replacing it in its entirety with thefollowing:
Section
732.865
Increase in Maximum Payment Amounts
The maximum payment amounts
set forth in this Subpart H shall be adjusted annually by
an inflation factor determined by the annual Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National
Product as published by the U.S. Department ofCommerce in its Survey ofCurrent
Business.
a)
The inflation factor shall be calculated each year by dividing the latest
published annual Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National Product by the
annual Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National Product for the previous
year.
The inflation factor shall be rounded to
the nearest 1/100th.
In no
case shall the inflation factor be more than five percent in a single year.
b)
Adjusted maximum payment amounts shall become effective on July
1 of
each year and shall remain in effect through June 30 ofthe following year.
The first adjustment shall be made on July
1, 2006,
by multiplying the
maximum payment amounts set forth in this Subpart H by the applicable
inflation factor.
Subsequent adjustments shall be made by multiplying the
latest adjusted maximumpayment amounts by the latest inflation factor.
c)
The Agency shall post the inflation factors on its website no later than the
date theybecome effective.
The inflation factors shall remain posted on
the website in subsequent years to aid in the calculation of adjusted
maximum payment amounts.
d)
Adjusted maximum payment amounts shall be applied as follows:
1)
For costs approved by the Agency in writing prior to the date the
costs are incurred, the applicable maximum payments amounts
shall be the amounts in effect on the date the Agency received the
budget in which the costs were proposed.
Once the Agency
approves a cost, the applicable maximum payment amount forthe
cost shall not be increased (e.g. by proposing the cost in a
subsequent budget).
5
2)
For costs not approvedby the Agency in writing prior to the date
the costs are incurred, including but not limited to early action
costs, the applicable maximum payments amounts shall be the
amounts in effect on the date the costs were incurred.
3)
Owners and operators shall have the burden ofrequesting the
appropriate adjusted maximum payment amounts in budgets and
applications for payment.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
Kyle Ro~1inger
Assistant Counsel
Gina Roccaforte
Assistant Counsel
DATED:_________
1021
North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box
19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
6
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER
OF:
)
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
)
R
04-022
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE
)
TANKS
(35
ILL. ADM:
CODE 732)
)
TESTIMONY OF HERNANDO ALBARRACIN IN SUPPORT OF
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO AMEND
35 ILL. ADM. CODE 732
Myname
is Hernando Albarracin.
I am a Unit Manager in the Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Section within the Bureau ofLand of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency.
I have been in my current position since January 1996.
Prior to assuming my current
position, I was a permit reviewer in the Permit Section in the Bureau ofLand beginning in April
1989.
Ireceived a B.S. in Mining Engineering in 1986 from Southern Illinois University at
Carbondale.
Myresume is attached.
Today, I will be testifying in support ofamendments to 35
Ill. Adm.
Code Part 732, specifically Subparts A, B,
and C (except 732.306).
Subpart A:
General
Section 732.100
—
Applicability.
Subsections 732.100(a)
and (b) are amended to make
Part 732 applicable to releases reported on or after September 24,
1994, but prior to June 24,
2002, the effective date ofPublic Act
92-0554.
Subsection 732.100(a) is further amended to
make Part 732 applicable to releases reported prior to September
12,
1993, if the owner or
operator elected prior to June 24, 2002, to proceed in accordance with Part 732 (i.e., electedto
proceed in accordance with Title XVI ofthe Environmental Protection Act (“Act”) (“Title
XVI”)).
Owners and operators electing on or after June 24,
2002, to proceed in accordance with
Title XVI are subject to Title XVI as amended by Public Act
92-0554,
and therefore are subject
to the site investigation and corrective action requirements in proposed Part 734.
The
applicability provisions ofproposed Part 734 dovetail with the amended applicability provisions
ofPart 732 so that releases subject to Title XVI fall under either Part 732 or Part 734.
Subsection 732.100(e) has been added to inform owners or operators that they may elect
to proceed in accordan~e
with 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 734.
Section 732.101
—
Election to Proceedunder Part 732.
Subsections 732.101(a), (b), and
(d) are amended to reflect the fact that owners and operators could elect to proceed
in accordance
with Part 732 (i.e., in accordance with Title XIV as it existed prior to
Public Act 92-0554) only
until June 23, 2002.
Proposed Part 734 contains corresponding provisions that allow owners and
operators to
elect to proceed in accordance with Part 734 (i.e., in accordance with Title XVI as
amended by Public Act
92-0554)
on or after June 24, 2002.
Subsections 732.10 1(a) and (b) are
further amended to
clarify that owners and operators who elected to proceed in accordance with
Part 732
may subsequently elect to proceed in accordance with Part 734.
-
In subsection 732.101(d), language has been added to
clarify that costs incurred on or
after the effective date of an election to proceed in accordance with Part 734 shall be payable
from the UST Fund in accordance with Part 734.
Section 732.103
—
Definitions.
The following definitions ofterms have been added:
Board, community water supply, confirmation ofrelease, county highway, district road, financial
interest, half-day, highway authority, indicator contaminants, Licensed Professional Engineer,
Licensed Professional Geologist, non-community water supply, practical quantitation limit,
public water supply, right-of-way, state highway, street, toll highway, township road, and
wellhead protection area.
In addition, the following definitions ofterms have been deleted:
line
item estimate.
Minor changes have been made to several definitions to clarify citations orto
2
correct grammatical errors.
Section
732.104— Incorporation by Reference.
The following reference materials have
been deleted in subsection 732.104(a) because they are not cited in the regulations:
Methods for
Chemical Analysis ofWater and Wastes; Practical Guide for Ground Water Sampling; Rapid
Assessment of Exposure to
Particulate Emissions from Surface Contamination Sites; and USGS
(United States Geological Survey), Techniques ofWater Resources Investigations ofthe United
States Geological Survey, Guidelines for Collection and Field Analysis ofGround Water
Samples for Selected Unstable Constituents.
The following reference materials have been added to subsection 732.104(a) to
update
the list ofreference materials:
Methods for the Determination ofMetals in Environmental
Samples; Methods for the Determination ofMetals in Environmental Samples, Supplement I;
Methods
for the Determination ofOrganic Compounds in Drinking Water; Methods for the
Determination ofOrganic Compounds in Drinking
Water, Supplement II;
and Methods for the
-
Determination ofOrganic Compounds in Drinking Water, Supplement III.
Subsection 732.104(b) has been deleted because the Code ofFederal Regulations is not
referenced in the regulations, and subsection 732.104(c) was renumbered subsection 732.104(b).
Section 732.106
—
Laboratory Certification.
Language has been added to this section to
clarify that a certification from the accredited laboratory stating that the samples were
analyzed
in accordance with the requirements ofthis section shall be included with the sampling results
submitted to the Illinois EPA.
The Illinois EPA wants the accredited laboratory, rather than the
Licensed Professional Engineer or Licensed Professional Geologist, to certify in accordance with
732.106.
Section 732.108— Licensed Professional Engineer or Licensed Professional Geologist
3
Supervision.
This section has been added to
clarify that all plans, budget plans, and reports,
excluding High Priority Corrective Action Completion Reports submitted pursuant to Section
732.409, conducted orprepared under Part 732 shall be conducted or prepared under the
supervision ofa Licensed Professional Engineer or Licensed Professional
Geologist.
High
Priority Corrective Actfon Completion Reports submitted pursuant to Section 732.409 shall be
prepared under the supervision of a Licensed Professional Engineer.
These changes are
necessary as a result ofPublic Act 92-0735.
Section 732.110
—
Form and Delivery ofPlans, Budgets,
and Reports; Signatures and
Certifications.
This section is proposed to consolidate general requirements for plans, budget
plans, and reports, which are currently stated in numerous sections ofPart 732.
Such
requirements include how plans and reports shall be submitted to the Illinois EPA, where they
shall be mailed or delivered, and the type of certificationthey shall contain.
Subsection 732.110(e) was amended to include a reference to
732.703(c).
Please refer to
the First Errata Sheet for additional information.
Subpart B:
Early Action
Section 732.200
—
General.
Wording hasbeen added to clarify that a budget plan is not
required for early action activities.
This is consistent with current Illinois EPA practices.
A
budget plan is not required since a work plan is not required (except for removal of free product).
Section 732.202
—
Early Action.
Subsections 732.202(b), (c), (d), and (e) are amended to
clarify that the time frame to
complete the required activities within the 20 days after initial
notification to IEMA and within the 45 days afterinitial notification to IEMA, as well as the
submission ofthe corresponding report, is 20
days plus 14 days and 45 days plus
14 days,
respectively.
This change is necessary to reflect the changes to
the OSFM’s release investigation
4
and confirmation requirements in 41111. Adm.
Code 170.5 80, which became effective May 1,
2003.
Statutory wording has been added to subsection 732.202(f) to clarify that,
for the purpose
ofpayment for early action cbsts, fill material shall not be removed in excess of4 feet from the
outside dimensions ofthe tank.
Subsection 732.202(g) and its subsequent Board Note are amended in response to
changes to the OSFM’s release investigation and
confirmation requirements in 41111. Adm. Code
170.580.
Effective May
1, 2003, owners and operators have 14 days instead ofseven to confirm
a release.
A new subsection 732.202(h)(1) is proposed to specify the locations where early action
soil samples must be collected when a UST is removed.
In accordance with current Illinois EPA
practice, the following soil sampling requirements are considered adequate to identify
contamination in the subsurface.
-
Wall samples.-- One sample shall be collected from each excavation wall.
For walls that
exceed 20
feet in length, one sample shall be collected for each 20 feet ofwall length,
or
fraction thereof, and the samples shall be evenly spaced along the length ofthe wall.
Floor samples.
Two samples shall be
collected from the excavation floor below each
UST with a volume of 1,000 gallons ormore.
One sample shall be collected from the
excavation floor below each UST with a volume ofless than 1,000 gallons.
Please note
that in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet subsection 732 .‘202(h)(1)(B) is amended to allow
the Agency to require additional floor samples for tanks with a volume of 15,000 gallons
or more if additional samples are needed to help determine whether contamination is
present in the subsurface.
Please refer to
the Agency’s First Errata Sheet for additional
5
information.
Piping samples.
One sample shall be
collected from the floor of each 20 feet ofUST
piping run excavation, or fraction thereof.
ForUST piping abandoned in place,
the
samples shall be collected in accordance with the requirements for subsection
732.202(h)(2)(B).
Backfill samples.
Ifbackfill is returned to the excavation, one representative sample of
the backfill shall be collected for each UST with
a volume ofless than 12,000 gallons and
two representative samples ofthe backfill shall be collected for each UST with a volume
of 12,000 gallons or more.
Please note that in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet subsection
732.202(h)(1)(D)
is amended to allow the Agency to require additional backfill samples
for tanks with a volume of 15,000 gallons or more if additional samples are needed to
help determine whether contamination is present in the subsurface.
Please refer to the
Agency’s First Errata Sheet for additional information.
A new subsection 732.202(h)(2) is added to specifythe locations where the samples must
be collected when a UST is not removed.
In accordance with current Illinois EPA practice, the
following soil sampling requirements are considered adequate to
identify contamination in the
subsurface.
Side samples.
One boring shall be drilled at the center point along each side of each
UST, or along each side ofeach cluster ofmultiple USTs, remaining in place.
If a side
exceeds 20 feet in length, one boring shall be drilled for each 20 feet ofside length, or
fraction thereof, and the borings shall be evenly spaced along the side.
The borings shall
not be drilled more than five feet from the backfill material surrounding the UST(s).
Each boring shall be drilled to a depth of30 feet, or until groundwater orbedrock is
6
encountered, whichever occurs first.
Piping samples.
For UST piping that is removed, samples shall be collected from the
floor ofthe piping run in accordance with the requirements for piping runs in subsection
732.202(h)(1).
For UST piping that remains in place, two borings (one on each side of
the piping) shairbe drilled for every 20 feet ofUST piping, or fraction thereof.
The
borings shall be
drilled as close practicable to, but not more than five feet from, the
locations ofsuspected piping releases.
Ifno release is suspected within a length ofUST
piping being sampled, the borings
shall be drilled in the center of the length being
sampled.
Each boring shall be drilled to
a depth of 15 feet, or until groundwater or
bedrock is encountered, whichever occurs first.
-
Ifauger refusal occurs during the drilling ofa boring required under subsection
732.202(h), the boring shall be drilled in an alternate location that will allow the boring to
be drilled to
the required depth.
The alternate location shall not be more than five feet
-
from the boring’s original location.
If auger refusal occurs during drilling ofthe boring
in the alternate location, drilling ofthe boring shall cease and the soil samples collected
from the location in which the boring was drilled to the greatest depth shall be analyzed
for the applicable indicator contaminants.
Soil sample collection.
One soil sample shall be collected from each.five-foot interval of
each boring required under subsection 732.202(h).
A five-foot interval was selected because
drill rigs typically use five-foot sections to collect a soil boring.
Each sample shallbe collected
from the locationwithin the five-foot interval that is the most contaminated as a result ofthe
release.
This should be determined with the use of a field-screening device, such as a
photoionization detector, or visually.
Ifan area of contamination cannotbe identified within a
7
five-foot interval, the sample shall be collected from the center of the five-foot interval,
provided, however,
that soil samples
shall not be collected from soil below the groundwater
table.
The reason for this is that contamination in the saturated zone will be addressed through
the investigation and remediation ofthe groundwater.
All
samples shall be analyzed for the
applicable indicator contaminants.
Renumbered subsection 732.202(h)(3)
is amended to require owners and operators to
submit a report demonstrating compliance with the most stringent Tier 1
remediation objectives
of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 742 (“Tier
1
remediation objectives”) if the remediation objectives have not
been exceeded and a groundwaterinvestigation
is not required.
The report shall include a
characterization ofthe site that demonstrates
compliance with the Tier
1
remediation objectives
for the applicable indicator contaminants and supporting documentation that includes a site map
meeting the requirements ofsubsection 732.1l0(a)(1), analytical results, chain ofcustody forms,
laboratory certifications, and a table comparing the analytical results ofall samples collected to
-
the Tier
1
remediation objectives.
Having the ability to request a No Further Remediation Letter
from the Illinois EPA after the completion of early action activities allows tank owners and
operators to obtain expedited closure of the release, and prevents clean sites from being
investigated and remediated unnecessarily.
For the purpose ofpayment from the UST Fund, the
report is not a Corrective Action Completion Report.
Renumbered subsection 732.202(h)(4) is amended to require owners and operators to
continue with a site evaluationunder Subpart C ofPart 732 if thô Tier
1
remediation objectives
are exceeded or a groundwater investigation is necessary.
The criteria for determining when a
groundwaterinvestigation is necessary have been added in new subsections 732.202(h)(4)(A)
through (C).
The criteria are taken from subsection 732.300(b)(2).
-
8
Section 732.203
—
Free Product Removal.
Subsection 732.203(a) has been amended to
specify the amount offree product that must be present in order to trigger the free product
removal requirements.
The Illinois EPA conducted a survey ofthe states to determine what
other states require for free product removal.
The Illinois EPA asked what the minimum amount
of free product is that requires removal and how it is measured.
Fifteen states responded and the
results ofthe survey are shown on Attachment A.
Based on experience and the results ofthe
survey, the Illinois EPA determined that free product exceeding one-eighth of an inch in
depth,
measured in a groundwatermonitoring well, must be removed as free product because it can be
accurately measured and practically removed with currently available equipment in the
marketplace.
In addition, in accordance with statutory requirements, free product must be
removed when it is present as sheen on groundwater in the tank excavation or on surface water.
Subsection 732.203(a)(4) has been amended to include two additional requirements.
The
free product removal report must contain the steps taken to identify the source
and extent ofthe
free product and a schedule offuture actions necessary to finish the recovery of free product.
Subsection 732.203(c) has been added to require the submission ofa free product
removal plan for freeproduct removal activities conducted more than 45
days after the
confirmation ofthe presence offree product, and to clarify that such activities are not considered
early action activities.
The illinois EPA feels a free product plan is necessary to keep free
product removal activities
on a schedule and to clarify what
activities are consistent with early
action work.
The plan also is consistent with other corrective action requirements.
Subsection 732.203(d) has been added to specify that if payment from the Fund is desired
for free product removal activities, the owner or operator shall submit a budget plan to the
Illinois EPA for review and approval with the corresponding free product removal plan.
The
-
9
budget plan is necessary to
keep a handle on
free product removal costs
that are incurred beyond
the early action period and is consistent with other corrective action requirements.
In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet the reference to a copy ofthe eligibility and
deductibility determination ~as
removed from subsection 732.203(d) to
allow free product
removal to proceed without delay.
Please refer to the Agency’s First Errata
Sheet for additional
information.
As with other plans and budget plans, new subsection 732.203(f) provides
that owners
and operators may conduct free product removal activities without first
submitting a plan or
budget plan, but that a plan and a budget plan must be submitted prior to the payment ofthe free
product removal costs.
If an owner or operator determines that an approved free product
removal plan or budget plan needs to be revised, new subsection 732.203(g) requires the
submission of an amended plan orbudget plan.
Section 732.204
—
Application for Payment for Early action Costs.
In conjunctionwith
-
the amendments to Section 732.200, Section 732.204 is
amended to reflect that budget plans are
not required for early action activities at any time.
As in Section 732.200, an exception is
provided for free product removal activities
conducted more than 45 days after the confirmation
ofthe presence offree product.
Subpart C:
Site Evaluation and Classification
Section 732.300
—
General.
Subsection 732.300(a)
is amended to clarify that owners and
operators do not need to evaluate and classify their sites in accordance with Subpart C if, after
early action, they submit a report demonstrating that the most stringent Tier
1
remediation
objectives of35
Ill. Adm. Code 742 for the applicable indicator contaminants have been met.
Subsection 732.300(b)(1) is amended by adding provisions addressing the contents ofthe
10
corrective action completion report for tank owners and operators who are proceeding under
subsection 732.300(b).
These provisions are repeated from Section 732.409.
The Illinois
EPA
requires the report if the tank owner or operatorwishes to obtain
a No Further Remediation
Letter without having to follow the classification requirements ofSubpart C.
The corrective a~ctioncompletion report shall include, but not be limited to, a narrative
and timetable describing the implementation and completion ofall elements of the remediation
and the procedures used for the collection and analysis ofsamples, soil boring logs, actual
analytical results, laboratory certification, site maps, well logs, and any other information or
documentation relied upon by the Licensed Professional Engineer in reaching the conclusion that
the requirements ofthe Act and regulations have been satisfied and that no further remediation is
required at the site.
In addition, subsections 732.3 00(b)(l)(A) and (b)(3) are added in conjunction with the
addition ofwater supply well survey requirements in other areas ofPart 732.
The Illinois EPA
proposes to amend the Board Note following Section
732.300(b) to
clarify that owners and
operators proceeding under subsection 732.300(b) are not entitled
to payment from the UST
Fund for costs incurred after completion ofearly action activities in accordancewith Subpart B,
and to remind tank owners and operators ofthis limitation.
Section 732.307
—
Site Evaluation.
In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet the words “most
stringent” were added prior to “objectives ordetection levels”
in subsection 732.3 07(j)(5)(C)(i)
to ensure that proper practical quantitation limits are used when samples are analyzed.
Please
refer to the Agency’s First Errata Sheet for additional information.
11
Attachment A
Free Product Survey
State
Free PrOduct Thickness (in.)
~Measurement
Method
Indiana
0.039
Interface probe or tape
Iowa
0.12
Not provided
Michigan
0.125
Interface probe
or bailer
Nebraska
0.12
Not provided
Nevada
0.5
Not provided
New Mexico
0.12
Interface probe ortape
New York
0.125
Interface tape
South Carolina
0.12
Interface probe or tape
South Dakota
0.0625
Interface probe
Virginia
0.12
Not provided
12
Hernando
A.
Albarracin
1021
North Grand Ave. East, P.O. Box 19276
-
Springfield, Illinois 62974-9276
•
(217)524-2448
Education
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
—
May 1986
Bachelor ofScience in Mining Engineering
Employment
illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, illinois —1996 to present
Public Service Administrator
As Unit Manager in the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Section, manage and
direct activities ofseven project managers in the unit.
-
•
Assign workload and provide technical guidance and assistance to project
managers in the review and evaluation ofprojects.
•
Perform annual performance evaluations.
•
Coordinate Site Remediation Program activities for the Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Section.
-
•
Manage special projects, such as the remediation of abandoned gas stations
funded by U.S. EPA grants, for the Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Section.
•
Respond to oral and written inquiries, including inquiries of a controversial or
sensitive nature.
•
Speak at Illinois Brownfields Conferences and otherpublic forums regarding
the remediation of underground storage tank releases.
•
Coordinate and facilitate the development ofLeaking Underground Storage
Tank Section documents for posting on the Internet.
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, illinois
—
1989-1996
Environmental Protection Engineer
-
As permit engineer in the Permit Section, reviewed hazardous waste management
permit applications for compliance with the Resource Conservation and RecoveryAct
and Illinois regulations.
•
Attended inspections ofhazardous waste management facilities in Illinois.
•
Attended public hearings concerning the issuance ofRCRApermits.
-
13
•
Responded to oral and written inquiries regarding hazardous waste
management regulations
in Illinois.
•
Completed continuing education courses related to hazardous waste
management.
•
Assistedwith the training ofnew employees.
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
—
1988-1989
ResearcherI
Performed work on rock mechanics research projects in the Department ofMining
Engineering.
•
Conducted experiments in the laboratory and analyzed data.
•
Installed instrumentation in illinois coal mines and
monitored data.
•
Assistedwith writing ofreports to project sponsors.
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
—
1986-1988
Graduate
Assistant
Conducted research on rock mechanics and ground control in the Department of
Mining Engineering, utilizing finite element computer software while pursuing a
master’s degree.
Special
Skills
Translate Illinois EPA documents to
Spanish to assist Hispanic communities in
Illinois with environmental issues.
14
BEFORE THE
ILLiNOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
iN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
)
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
R 04-22
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
TANKS
(35
ILL. ADM. CODE 732)
)
TESTIMONY OF DOUGLAS W. CLAY IN SUPPORT OF
THE ENViRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO AMEND
35
ILL. ADM. CODE 732
My name is Doug Clay. I am the manager ofthe Leaking Underground Storage
Tank (“LUST”) Section within the Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency.
I have been in my current position since September of 1994.
The
LUST Section
is primarily responsible for reviewing the technical adequacy ofplans,
reports and associated budgets for the remediation ofreleases from underground storage
tanks regulated under Title XVI ofthe Environmental Protection Act (“Act”) and 35
Ill.
Adm. Code,
Parts 731
and 732.
Prior to
assuming my current position, I was the manager ofthe Disposal
Alternative Unit within the Permit Section ofthe Bureau ofLand.
I have also worked in
the Permit Section in the Bureau ofWater.
I have been employed at the Illinois EPA
since 1983 following the receipt ofa B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the
University ofIllinois.
I have been a Registered Professional Engineer in Illinois since
1989.
A copy ofmy resume is attached.
Today I will be testifying in support ofthe proposed amendments to 35 Ill.
Adm.
Code, Part 732.
These amendments are the result of: (1) modification to
the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act by Public Acts
92-0554
and 92-0735;
(2) the need to
reform the currentbudget and reimbursement process; and (3) to
clarify issues that have
arisen since Part 732 was last amended.
My testimony will provide a brief overview and
focus on a portion ofSubpart C (Section 732.306 only), Subpart D, Subpart E, portions of
Subpart F and
Subpart G.
Overview
—
The proposed regulatory amendments are intended to
streamline the
leaking underground storage tank remediation process, clarify remediation requirements
and most notably reform the budget and reimbursement process.
The new budget and
reimbursement process would eliminate the majorityi~f
budgets and reimbursement
packages submitted based on a time and material basis
and replace them with submittals
based on unit rates and lump sums for specific tasks established in the regulations.
We
believe that this will streamline the approval ofbudgets and the processing of
reimbursement claims.
Currently, there is a tremendous amount oftime spent reviewing
budgets and reimbursement packages.
Furthermore, the majority ofplan and report
denials, amendments to plans and reports submitted by consultants, and appeals before
the Illinois Pollution Control Board are related to
budget and reimbursement issues, as
opposed to technical issues.
The Agency believes that the proposed amendments will
allowmore efficient use ofBoard and Agency resources, improve consistency, lower
remediation costs,
expedite cleanups, and allow tank owners and operators to be
reimbursed in a more timely manner.
The proposed costs in Subpart H were developed
with input from the consulting industry and other trade organizations plus nearly 15 years
ofAgency experience administering the leaking underground storage tank reimbursement
program, and are generally consistent with the rates we currently approve for
reimbursement.
Over the past
15 years,
the Agency has approved over one-halfbillion
2
dollars for reimbursement.
This involved reviewing over
12,800 budgets and over
18,300 applications for payments.
In addition,
it should be noted that our current rates
and the approachto the development of our current rates have been upheld in Board
decisions.
Section 732.306
—
Deferred Site Classification; Priority List forPayment.
Wording has been changed to clarify the administrative procedures with regard to
deferring site classification due to insufficient funds being available forreimbursement
from the UST Fund.
In addition, the minimum criteria that must be met before an owner
or operator is allowed to deferhas been modified and would require that the extent ofsoil
and groundwater contamination be determined.
The Agency believes that the proposed
additions are required to be able to determine that the deferral of site investigation for the
subject release would not pose a threat to human health or the environment.
This is the
same wording that is being proposed in Section 732.406.
Section
732.404
—
High Priority Site.
Wording was added in subsection
732.404(e) requiring the potable water well survey identified in subsection 732.307(f) to
be extended if the contamination has migrated beyond the property boundary or if the soil
andlor groundwater is going to be left in place and
the groundwater is modeled to migrate
beyond the property boundary.
The same sources ofinformation previously required
must be contacted and documentation provided to help ensure the adequate protection of
potable water supply wells.
In addition,
the Agency may require a more extensive well survey, which may
include a physical survey ofwells in the area if site-specific circumstances warrant.
For
example, if the original well survey is conducted and identifies that some, but not all, of
3
the homes in a subdivision adjacent to the site are hooked up to the community water
supply well and the remaining homes were not identified as having potable wells.
This
would be a reason to conduct further investigations, such as a physical well survey, as to
how these home get their potable water.
A physical well surveycould include
interviewing property ownerregarding the existence ofwells on site or in the area,
inspection ofproperties to identify wellheads, distributing doorhangers to collect
information on potable wells in the area, etc.
Section 732.405
—
Plan Submittal
and Review.
Wording was changed in
subsection 732.405(b) to eliminate
line item estimates of corrective action
costs since this
is no longer required as part ofthe new budget and reimbursement process, and to
reference Subpart H of Part 732 for maximum payment amounts for corrective action.
In addition, wording was added that the Agencymay require and take into
consideration the cost of a proposed remediation, as compared to other methods of
remediation available,
not just conventional (dig and haul) remediation.
We do not
intend to require cost comparisons to
other types ofremediation as a standard
requirement.
However, if a costly methodology is proposed, the Agency may require
comparison to
other technology that has proven to be effective in similar situations at a
much lower cost.
This will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Wording was changed in subsection 732.405(d) to require that a budget be
approved by the Agency prior to seeking payment from the UST Fund.
This is needed
for administrative purposes.
LUST Section technical staff review and approve the
budgets, while the LUST Claims Unit (LCU) staff reviews the
actual payment requests.
LCU staffrelies on the approvedbudget to determine that the reimbursement requested
4
will not exceed the approved amount.
Without an approved budget, payment requests
must be forwarded to the technical staff for review and then sent back to
LCU for final
processing, delaying the time it takes to
issue reimbursementpayments.
In addition, wording was added to subsection 732.405(d) in the Board Note that
highlights that all reimbursement requests must be submitted to the Agency no later than
one year after issuance of the No Further Remediation
letter.
This is consistent with
wording added at subsection 732.606(rr).
This will give owner and operators ample time
to submit reimbursement claims to
the Agency, while setting a specific deadline for
reimbursement for a given occurrence.
The deadline in needed to help the Agency
manage the UST Fund and have better handle on the outstanding liability.
Section 732.406
—
Deferred Corrective Action; Priority List for Payment.
Wording has been changed to clarify the administrative procedures with regard to
deferring corrective action due to
insufficient funds being available forreimbursement
from the UST Fund.
In addition, the minimum criteria that must be met before an owner
or operator is allowed to
defer has been modified and would require that the extent of soil
and groundwater contamination be determined.
The Agency believes that the proposed
additions are required to be able to determine that the deferral of corrective action for the
subject release would not pose a threat to human health or the environment.
This is the
same wording as proposed in Section 732.306.
Section 732.407
—
Alternative Technology.
Wording was added to subsection
732.407(b) to ensure that a proposed alternative technology does not substantiallyexceed
the cost ofother readily available alternative technologies.
This is needed to help prevent
excessive remediation costs and to ensure the solvency ofthe UST Fund.
5
Subsection 732.407(d) was added to allow the Agency the ability to require
remote monitoring ofalternative technology.
This may result in remote monitoring by
the Agency, the consultant or both.
If required, this would allow the Agency andlor the
consultant to monitor the effectiveness and efficiency ofan alternative technology
without having to make frequent trips to
the site (if that
is being proposed).
This would
be a cost that would be reimbursable on a site-specific basis pursuant to 732.850 if
approved by the Agency as part of a corrective action plan, and would be expected to
reduce operation and maintenance costs by limiting personnel time on the site to inspect
whether the system is
operating.
Section 732.409
—
Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective ActionReports.
Wording was added to identify the documentation ofthe water supply well survey
conducted pursuant to
subsection 732.404(e) that the Agency needs to
ensure that potable
water supply wells
are adequately protected from contamination left in place as part of
the remediation plan.
This is consistent with the documentation that is required in
subsection 732.309(a).
Section
732.500 through Section 732.505
-
Wording has been added throughout
Subpart E to clarify Agency review procedures.
An explanation ofthe specific wording
changes is provided in the Statement ofReasons.
Section 732.605
—
Eligible Corrective Action Costs.
Wording has been added to
subsection 732.605(a)(l7)
to clarify that cost associated with the destruction or
dismantling and reassembly of above grade structures must be approved by the Agency
prior to such activity to be eligible for reimbursement.
Furthermore, such costs in excess
of$10,000
are not eligible for reimbursement.
This limitis what the Agency believes is
6
reasonable for destruction or dismantling and reassembly ofa structure and reflects
historical practice.
In the Agency’s First Errata Sheet the wording in subsection
732.605(a)(17) is changed so that the $10,000 limit applies per occurrence rather than per
site.
There could be situations where destruction or dismantling and reassembly costs
would be appropriate at a site more than once.
For example, when a cleanup is
completed and the owner receives an NFR letter, then two years later a second
occurrence is reported.
As part ofthis second occurrence, a building must be
demolished.
Up to $ 10,00 in costs associated with the second occurrence would be
reimbursable with the proposed change in the First Errata Sheet.
Wording has been added at subsection
732.605(a)(19)
to clarify that
removal/abandonment ofa potable water supply well, and replacement ofthe well or
connection to a public water supply, whichever is less, may be an eligible cost.
This
addition is made to codify current Agency practice.
Wording has been added at 732.605(a)(20) to clarify that costs associated with the
repair or replacement ofpotable water supply lines damaged to the point ofrequiring
repair or replacement as a direct result ofthe release may be an eligible cost.
The key
here is that it is
the “direct result ofthe release” that requires the action.
This addition is
to
codify current Agency practice.
Section 732.606
—
Ineligible Corrective Action Costs.
Wording hasbeen
added to
subsection 732.606(kk) to expand the list ofcosts that are eligible forreimbursement
after issuance ofa No Further Remediation (NFR) Letter.
In addition to
cost incurred for
MTBE remediation pursuant to subsection 732.310(i)(2), the activities identified would
not be expected to be performed prior to issuance ofthe NFR Letter.
Therefore, these
7
costs should be reimbursed, if reasonable, if incurred afterissuance ofthe NFR Letter.
However, they must still be incurred and submitted for payment within one year of
issuance ofthe NFR Letter in accordance with subsection 732.601(j).
Subsection 732.6O6Q,p) was added as an ineligible item under Part 732 since
eligible cost incurred after election into Part 734 would be reimbursed under Part 734.
In
addition, subsection 732.606(qq) was added to make it clear that free product reports that
are not submitted in accordance with the schedule pursuant to 732.203(a)(5) are not
reimbursable.
Subsections
732.606(tt), (uu), (vv), (xx), (bbb), (ccc) and (eee) were added to
make it clear that these costs are ineligible and to codify current Agency practice.
Subsection 732.606(yy) was added to clarify that treatment or disposal ofsoil not
exceeding the applicable remediation objectives is not reimbursable.
This is an issue
when the contamination is at some depth from the surface, but between the surface and
the contamination there is a significant amount ofclean overburden.
The UST Fund
should not pay for disposal of soil if it is not needed and the overburden could be
removed, set aside and put back as backfill once the contaminated soil is removed.
There
may be some cases when it is more cost effective to remove and dispose ofthe
overburden with the contaminated soil.
These situations would only be reimbursed with
prior approval by the Agency.
Subsection 732.606(zz) and (aaa) was added to clarify when the removal and
replacement ofa potable water supply source is eligible for reimbursement.
This is tied
back to subsections 732.605(a)(l9) and (20).
8
Subsection 732.606(bbb) was added as a counterpart to subsections
732.605(a)(19)
and (20) and to codify current Agency practice.
Subsection 732.606(ccc) was added as a counterpart to subsection 732.606(q) and
to codify current Agency practice.
Subsection 732.606(ddd) was added to make it clear that fees orpayments to
government
entities or other persons for corrective action related activities, such as fees
to gain access to property for investigation or remediation, to secure institutional controls,
or to obtain permits, are not reimbursable.
The Agencyhas approved reimbursement of
some reasonable fees and payments for state, county orlocal permits.
However, these
have become more and more variable and have become very hard to justify as reasonable.
We have not reimbursed fees orpayments for access to property, or for agreeing to an
institutional control.
Fees and payments identified above would be the responsibility of
the owner or operator, would not be reimbursed from the UST Fund, and
should be ‘taken
into consideration when evaluating remediation options.
Subsection 732.606(eee) is added to codifycurrent Agency practice.
Section 732.6 14
—
Audits
and Access to Records; Records Retention.
This
Section was added to reflect statutory language giving the Agency authority to audit
records associated with corrective action pursuant to Title XVI ofthe Act.
This section
provides more specifics regarding the Agency’s audit authority and identifies specific
record retention time frames.
This section is based upon other Board and Agency rules
addressing record retention and inspection.
The Agency plans to perform periodic audits
ofowners, operators and
consultants associated with the remediation ofleaking
underground storage tanks.
9
/
Section
732.703
—
Duty to Record a No Further Remediation Letter.
Subsection
732.703(c) was changed to allow any highway authority, not just the Illinois Department
ofTransportation (DOT), to enter into a Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) with the
Agency to perfect the No Further Remediation Letter.
Subsection (c) was originally put
in at IDOT’s request, since there was no specific property title for DOT right-of-ways on
which to record a No Further Remediation Letter.
This issue has surfaced for other
highway authority entities (e.g. counties and municipalities).
Therefore, the Agency is
proposing that the use ofan MOA be expanded to any highway authority.
10
Douglas W. Clay, P1E.
Professional
1995
-
Present
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency
experience
Section Manager
•
Responsible
for
managing
the
Leaking
Underground
Storage
Tank
Program
in
Illinois,
which
oversees
the
cleanup
of
releases
from
underground storage tanks throughoutthe state.
•
Directly and indirectly manager 42 staff and managers
•
Responsible
for partial
administration of the
UST
Fund,
which is
used to
reimburseof underground storage tank owners and operators.
1994
-
1995
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
Section Manager (Acting)
•
Responsible
for
managing
the
Leaking
Underground
Storage
Tank
Prograrh
in
Illinois,
which
oversees
the
cleanup
of
releases
from
underground
storage tanks throughout the
state.
•
Directly and indirectly manager 42 staff and managers
•
Responsible for partial
administration of the UST
Fund,
which
is
used to
reimburse of underground storage tank owners and operators.
1990
-
1994
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency
Unit Manager
Responsible for managing
the
Disposal Alternative Unit
in
the Bureau of
Land, Permit Section
•
The
unit
reviews
permit
applications
for
solid
and
hazardous
waste
treatment and storage facilities.
1988
-
1990
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer
IV
Review
permit
applications for solid waste disposal and
transfer facilities
in the Bureau of Land, Permit Section, Solid Waste
Unit.
•
Actas
lead worker in the Solid Waste
Unit.
1985
-
1988
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer Ill
•
Review
permit
applications
for sewage
treatment plants,
pump
~tatioflS
and sewer connections.
1984
-
1985
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer
II
•
Review
permit applications
for sewage
treatment
plants,
pump
stations
and sewer connections.
1983
-
1984
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Engineer
I
•
Review
permit
applications
for sewage
treatment
plants,
pump
stations
•
-
and sewer connections.
Education
1978
-
1982
University
of Illinois
Champaign-Urbana
•
Received a
B.S. in Civil Engineering
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
)
R04-22
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE)
TANKS
(35
ILL. ADM. CODE 732)
)
TESTIMONY OF DOUGLAS E.
OAKLEY IN SUPPORT OF
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL
TO AMEND 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 732
1.
Background
My name is Doug Oakley. I have been the official manager of the LUST
Claims Unit
for the past
5
years.
However, I have worked in
the reimbursement / payment
side of the
program
in
various
capacities
since January of
1990.
The primary function
of the
LUST
Claims Unit is to review claims
submitted for payment
from the Underground Storage
Tank
(UST) Fund to determine if the costs
are eligible, reasonable, and, if necessary, approved in a
Corrective
Action
Plan
and
Budget.
I
am a
U.S.
Army Veteran and
in
1980
received
an
Associate Degree From Lincoln Land Community College. My resume is attached. I will be
testifying in support of amendments to 35
Ill. Admin. Code Part 732.
2.
Description ofthe Proposed Regulations
Subpart F:. Payment From The Fund
Section 732.601
—
Applications for Payment.
Subsection 732.601(b)(9) has been
added to clarify that requests
forpayment must be accompanied by legible invoices, receipts
and supporting documentation allowing the Agency to make a clear determination ofwhat
sorts ofactivities are being requested forpayment. This information has always been
requested by the Agency as part ofthe application for payment.
1
New
subsection 732.60 l(b)(lO) has been added as a result of an alarming number of
phone calls
to the
LUST Claims Unit
from subcontractors who claim
not to
have been paid
for the work they performed at LUST
sites. In order to
claim handling charges, the primary
contractor
must
pay
the
subcontractor.
The
Agency
feels
that
by
requiring lien
waivers,
cancelled checks or signed and notarized affidavits
from subcontractors, this problem should
be resolved.
Language in Subsection 732.601 (b)(11) was
added to
ensure that laboratories that are
accredited in Illinois perform Lab Analysis work submitted for payment from the fund.
Wording has
been
deleted
from
Subsection
732.60 1(f)
and
(g)
to
clarify
that
the
Agency intends to review all amended plans, budgets and claims prior to payment.
New
subsection
732.601(i)
was
added
to
ensure
that
all
corrective
action
that
is
deferred due to
insufficient funds would have
to be
performed and approved
by the Agency
before payment can occur.
New
subsection
732.601(j)
was
added
to
encourage
prompt
submittals
of claims
against
the
UST
Fund.
Long
delays
in
claim
submittals
can
and
have
led to
numerous
problems
involving
proper
documentation of costs.
Avoiding
such
delays
should
help
to
streamline the
claim
review process and
result
in
prompter payments.
In addition,
this
is
needed to better predict outstanding liability against the UST Fund, plan for future claims and
properly manage
the UST Fund
to
ensure
its
solvency.
Please
note
that
in
its
First
Errata
Sheet the Agency has removed references to budget plans and amendments.
Section
732.602
—
Review
of Applications
for
Payment.
This
section has
been
clarified
to
reflect the
fact that
the Agency
conducts
a full review
of all
applications for
payment.
Section
732.605
—
Eligible
Corrective
Action
Costs.
Wording has
been
added
to
Subsection 732.605(a)(16)
to clear up confusion regarding when concrete replacement should
2
occur.
In
the
past,
situations
arose
where
owners/operators
replaced
concrete
after
early
action
activities,
before all
remediation was
complete. The
Agency believes
that paying
for
concrete/asphalt replacement after the issuance ofan NFR ensures that costs
associated with
these activities will only be paid once.
Section
732.606
—
Ineligible
Corrective
Action
Cost.
Language
in
Subsection
732.606(g) was added to this Section
to
clarify that legal fees are ineligible for payment from
the UST Fund unless the owner/operator prevails before the Board and
the Board authorizes
payment of such costs.
“Legal Defense Costs” was a somewhat ambiguous term when used
in the context ofLUST clean ups.
Language
in
Subsection
732.606(mm)
was
modified
to
clarify
the
intent
of
subsection
732.60l(b)(lO).
Language
in
Subsection
732.606(rr) was
added
to
clarify
the
intent
of Subsection
732.601(j).
Language
in
Subsection
732.606(ss)
is proposed to
prohibit companies
from adding
handling charges
to the fees of their associated entities. It does not prohibit hiring one’s own
company to
do
the work and
be paid a fair and
reasonable price including profit.
It simply
disallows handling charges.
Language
in
Subsection
732.606(ww)
was
added
to
prevent
multiple
layers
of
subcontracting
and
handling
charge
assessments.
This
change
reflects
current
Agency
practice.
Section
732.610
—
Indemnification.
Language
in
Section
732.610
was
added
to
further
clarify and
define the
steps
and
procedures
necessary
to
access
the
UST
Fund
for
indemnification purposes.
3
1021
North
Grand
Avenue
Phone 217-782-6762
East
Fax 21 7-5571165
P.O.
Box 19276
E-mail
Springfield,
Illinois 62794-9276
Doug.Oakley@epa.state.il.us
Douglas E. Oakley
Professional
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency.
experience
Public
Service
Administrator
(July
1999
to
present)
Manage,
direct,
organize
and
supervise
the Unit
activities
of all
staff
responsible
for
auditing
and
tracking
claims
against
the
Leaking
Underground
Storage
Tank
Fund;
assist
the
Division
Manager in Leaking
Underground Storage Tank and Brownfields
accounting
issues,
including
appearing
at
hearings
before
the
Illinois Pollution Control Board.
Accountant III / Accountant Advanced (July 1993 to July
1999)
Assign,
supervise and
review the Unit
activities
of a
staff of
twelve professional
and
sub-professional
personnel
in
maintaining
accounting
records
regarding
the
Leaking
Underground
Storage
Tank
Fund;
work
daily
with
the
accounting
section
head
in
the
developmentofcomplex new procedures and program changes.
Accountant
II
(February
1992
thru
July
1993)
Indepen4ently
perform
complex
accounting
and
auditing
work
in
regards
to
the
Leaking
Underground Storage
Tank
Fund,
assist
in
converting
manual
financial
operations
to
data
processing,
train
lower level
accountants and office assistants,
prepare complex audit
findings
and
give testimony
in
legal
hearings
and
proceedings
on
such findings.
Accountant
I
(January
1990
thru
February
1992)
Maintained general account books, prepared financial statements and
reports in regards to the illinois Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Fund,
assisted upper level accountants in the preparation ofdetailed
reports
to
the
Agency
Division
Manager
and
Director,
attended
public
seminars as required.
Office
Assistant
(May
1986
thru
January
1990).
Maintained a
complex
complete
set of general
account books
and
files pertaining to
special
waste
stream applications,
reviewed and
examined entries of various
types of files, documents
and
records,
maintained
log
book
associated
with
special
waste
generator
identifications numbers.
Illinois
Department
of Revenue
(June
1984
thru
May
1986).
Validated,
tracking
check
perfecting
and
processing
over
300
different
varieties
of tax
forms
and
checks.
Supervised
staff of
check perfecters during tax season.
4
Additional
United
States Army
—
Veteran
Background
Former Commander and present member ofAmerican Legion Post
442
Education
Lincoln
Land Community College, Springfield,
II.
—
1980, Associate
degree in Business Administration
Graduate
of
United
States
Army
School
of
Transportation
located
in
Ft.
Eustis, Va.
-
1967
Awards
received
Certificate of Merit
—
Illinois Department of Revenue,
1985
Superior
Performance
Award
—
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
1991
Bureau of Land Employee of the Month
—
Illinois
Environmental
Protection Agency, July 1992
Ten Year Service Award
—
State OfIllinois
—
1994
Fifteen Year Service Award
—
State ofIllinois
-
1999
5
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO
)
R04-22
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
LEAKiNG UNDERGROUND STORAGE
)
TANKS
(35
ILL. ADM. CODE 732)
)
TESTIMONY OF BRIAN BAUER IN SUPPORT OF
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO AMEND
35
ILL. ADM. CODE 732
Myname is Brian Bauer.
I am a Project Manager in the Leaking Underground
Storage Tank Section within the Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency.
I have worked in my current position since April
1992.
I received a B.S. in
Biology in 1990 from Northland College and a M.A. in Environmental
Studies in
1998
from the University ofIllinois at Springfield.
My resume is attached.
Today I will testify in support of the proposal to adopt amendments to 35 Ill.
Adm.
Code 732.
This proposal is the result ofmodifications to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act by Public Acts
92-0554
and 92-0735, and the need to
reform the current reimbursement procedures.
My testimony will focus on the following
maximum payment amounts proposed in Subpart H, as well as Appendix E, ofPart 732:
Section 732.8 10
UST Removal or Abandonment Costs
Section 732.8 15
Free Product or Groundwater Removal and
Disposal
Section 732.820
Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Section 732.840
Replacement ofConcrete, Asphalt, or Paving;
Destruction or Dismantling and Reassembly of
Above Grade Structures
Section 732.845
Professional Consulting Services
Section 732.APPENDIX E
Personnel Titles and Rates
1
Harry Chappel will discuss the remaining portions of Subpart H in his testimony.
Since
1989
the Agency has reviewed over 18,300
applications for payment and
paidmore than $565,000,000.00 from the Underground Storage Tank Fund.
Since
September
13,
1993, the Agency has reviewed over 12,800 budgets
for proposed
corrective action activities.
Based on this collective experience, the Agency believes that
the following proposed maximum costs are reasonable and fair.
The Agency realizes that
the amount ofdata used to calculate the proposed maximum payment amounts may
appear small, however these averages are consistent with the Agency’s historical data and
the rates the Agency is presently approving in budgets and applications for payment.
Subsection 732.8 10 UST Removal orAbandonment Costs
The allowable costs for the excavation, removal, and disposal or abandonment of
an UST system are listed in the table below.
The maximum cost is based on the size of
each UST being removed or abandoned.
UST Volume
Maximum Total Amount per UST
110—999
gallons
$2,100.00
1,000
—
14,999 gallons
$3,150.00
15,000 or more gallons
$4,100.00
The above rates include all costs associated with the excavation, removal, and disposal or
abandonment of an UST system.
Costs for consultant oversight and the disposal ofwaste
other than the UST itself are not included in this rate.
An evaluation oftwentyLUST sites, nine ofwhich had tank removal or
abandonment charges broken out as separate charges, was conducted.
At the nine LUST
sites a total of34 USTs were either removed or abandoned in place.
The evaluation
revealed that the average cost to remove each ofthe USTs was $3,152.71.
Based on the
Agency’s experience, this average cost
is consistent with the amounts the Agency has
2
seen historically for the removal ofUSTs within the typical range of 6,000-gallons to
10,000-gallons in size.
During conversations with UST removal contractors it was
determined that smaller tanks (110-gallons to 999-gallons) cost less and that largertanks
(15,000-gallons ormore) cost more to remove or abandon thanmedium-sized tanks
(1,000-gallons to
14,999-gallons).
However, not proportionally more.
Section 732.8 15 Free Product or Groundwater Removal and Disposal
The maximum allowable costs for the removal, transportation, and disposal of
free product or groundwater shall not exceed $0.68 per gallon.
This rate includes, but is
not limited to, all costs associated with the removal, transportation and mobilization, and
the disposal offree product or groundwater.
The rate is for the removal of free product or
groundwater from an excavation, monitoring well, sump, or other location via a vacuum
truck as well as the removal of free product or groundwater from drums collected via
hand bailing offree product from a monitoring well or sump or other approved method.
Contaminated groundwater collected during monitoring well development or purging
activities may also be disposed and reimbursed through this method instead ofdisposing
ofcontaminated groundwater in drums, which will be discussed later.
An evaluation of fifty-seven LUST
sites where free product and/or contaminated
groundwater was removed via one ofthe methods discussed above revealed that the
average cost to remove, transport,
and dispose free product and/or contaminated
groundwater was $0.68 per gallon.
Based on discussions with consultants and
contractors it was determined that a minimum amount needed to be established since it
would not be
economicallyfeasible to
dispose of small amounts offree product and
groundwater at the per-gallon rate.
The Agency conducted a survey ofvacuum truck
contractors and determined that a $200.00 minimum charge should be available for
3
instances where small amounts offree product and groundwater were being removed,
transported, and disposed.
Section 732.820(a) Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
The allowable maximum costs for drilling for the purpose of collecting soil
samples and/or the installation ofa monitoring well and for borings advanced for the
purpose ofinjecting a compound for a remediation activity are listed in the table below.
The table establishes a rateper linear foot ofdrilling advanced based on the type of
drilling that
is conducted and the reason for the drilling.
Type ofDrilling
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
$23.00 per foot
Direct-push platform
$18.00 per foot
Direct-pushplatform for injection
$15.00 per foot
The above rate includes, but is not limited to, all costs
formobilizing and demobilizing
the drill rig or direct-push platform to and from the site, drilling labor, which usually
consists oftwo people (a driller and a laborer), decontamination ofthe drilling
equipment, the actual act ofdrilling, soil boring abandonment, and incidental expenses or
charges such as 55-gallon drums, bentonite to backfill the soil boring, liners, sleeves, or
concrete coring.
The rates do not include costs associated with consultant oversight of
the drilling or monitoring well installation.
The rates are broken down into two different drilling types: hollow-stem auger
and direct-push platform.
Hollow-stem auger drilling is
considered the conventional
drilling method forcollecting
soil samples and installing monitoring wells that uses, as
the name implies, a hollow-stem auger.
A drill rig rotates the auger, and a bit on the
end
of the auger loosens the soil, which then brings the soil to the surfaceby the rotating
auger flights.
Direct-push is a method that employs hollow steel rods that are driven,
4
pushed, and/orvibrated into the ground.
Some direct-push platforms are capable of using
an auger tool for the installation ofa monitoring well.
Since there is an additional
amount ofdrilling that
is required to install a monitoring well via a direct-push platform
with an auger attachment (more so thanjust installing a direct—push monitoring well), the
applicable drilling rate for a direct-push platform with an auger attachment will be the
hollow-stem auger rate rather thanthe direct-push platform rate.
A.
Hollow-stem AugerDrilling
An evaluation of forty-nine LUST sites revealed the average for hollow-stem
auger drilling to be $16.72 per linear foot ofsoil boring drilled.
Additional average costs
associated with hollow-stem auger drilling are as follows:
Activity
Average
Mobilization / Demobilization
$307.72 per event
Decontamination
$136.18 per event
Based on the Agency’s experience and the amount ofdrilling required to satisfy
the proposed regulation changes it was determined that the average amount offeet drilled
at one event ranges from
100 to 120 feet.
Assuming an average of 100
feetof drilling per
event, eight soil borings advanced to a depth of 10 to
15 feet, an average cost per linear
foot drilled for mobilization and demobilization, decontamination, and well abandonment
would be as follows:
Activity
Cost per foot
Mobilization / Demobilization
$3.08
Decontamination
$1.36
Adding the above costs to the average for hollow-stem auger drilling of$16.72
per linear foot ofsoil boring drilled,
the total cost per linear foot drilled is
$21.16.
To
5
cover incidental expenses or charges,
$1.84 per foot was added for a total cost of$23.00
per linear foot drilled using a hollow-stem auger.
Based on conversations with consultants it was determinedthat drilling events
where only a limited number of soil borings
ormonitoring wells would be installed
would not be economicallypossible
since certain costs
such as mobilization,
demobilization, and decontamination were at a fixed rate regardless ofthe number offeet
being drilled.
The Agency determined that a $1,500.00 minimum charge should be
available for instances when limited hollow-stem auger drilling was needed.
B.
Direct-push Platform
An evaluation ofnine LUST sites revealed the average daily rate forthe use ofa
direct-push platform ranged from $1,000.00 to $1,200.00.
Based on the Agency’s
experience this range is typical ofwhat the Agency would normally see.
Again,
assuming
an average of 100 feet ofdrilling per event, eight soil borings advanced to a
depth of10 to
15 feet, an average cost per linear foot pushed would be $10.00 to $12.00.
The Agency assumed that the same additional cost as hollow-stem auger drilling would
be incurred with direct-push.
These costs are as follQws:
Activity
Cost per foot
Mobilization / Demobilization
$3.08
Decontamination
$1.36
Adding the above costs to
the upper limit value ofthe average range for direct-
push platform drilling of$12.00 per linear foot of direct-push soil boring, the total cost
per linear foot drilled is $16.44.
To
cover incidental expenses or charges, $1.56 per foot
was added for a total cost of$18.00 per linear foot drilled using a direct-push platform.
Based on conservations with consultants it was determined that drilling events
where only a couple ofdirect-push soil borings or monitoring wells would be installed
6
would not be economically possible since certain costs such as mobilization,
demobilization, and decontamination were at a fixed rate regardless of the number offeet
being drilled.
The Agency determined that a $1,200.00 minimum charge should be
available for instances when limited direct-push soil borings were needed.
C.
Direct-push Platform for Injection
The rate for direct-push platform for injection is included the Agency’s First
Errata Sheet to 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 732.
The direct-push platform for injection of
compounds forremedial purposes rate used the same evaluation ofnine LUST sites
mentioned above that revealed the average daily rate for the use ofa direct-push platform
ranged from $1,000.00 to
$1,200.00.
Again, assuming an average of 100 feet of drilling
per event, eight soil borings advanced to a depth of 10 to
15
feet, an average cost per
linear foot pushed would be $10.00 to $12.00. The Agency assumed that the same
additional mobilization costs, as hollow-stem auger drilling would be incurred with
direct-push for injection.
These costs are as follows:
Activity
Cost per foot
Mobilization / Demobilization
$3.08
Adding the above cost to the upper limit value ofthe average range for direct-
push platform drilling of$12.00 per linear foot ofdirect-push soil boring, the total cost
per linear foot drilled is
$15.00.
Since soil sampling or the installation ofa monitoring
well would be conducted at the same time as the injection of a compound, neither
incidental expenses nor decontamination charges were included in this rate.
Based on conversations with consultants it was determined that drilling events
where only a couple ofdirect-push soil borings or monitoring wells would be installed
would not be economically possible
since certain costs such as mobilization and
demobilization were at a fixed rate regardless ofthe number offeet being drilled.
It was
7
also assumed that direct-push platform drilling for injection would have similar economic
restraints; therefore, the Agency determined that
a $1,200.00 minimum charge should be
available for instances when limited direct-push for injection soil borings were needed.
Section 732.820(b) Drilling, Well Installation,
and Well Abandonment
Groundwater-monitoring Wells
Ifa permanent monitoring well were installed in a soil boring advanced in
conjunction with Subsection 732.820(a) the maximum rates listed in the following table
would be applicable:
Type ofBorehole
Maximum Total Amount
Hollow-stem auger
$1 6.50/foot
Direct-push platform
$ 12.50/foot
The above rates include,
but are not limited to, all costs forthe installation of a
groundwater-monitoring well except for costs associated with drilling or consultant
oversight ofthe drilling or monitoring well installation.
The rates are broken down into two different drilling types: hollow-stem auger
and direct-push platform.
Some direct-push platforms are capable ofusing an augertool
for the installation ofa monitoring well.
Since the materials used to install monitoring
wells via a direct-push platform with an auger attachment are similar to
the materials
used to install monitoring wells via a hollow-stem auger, the applicable rate for
monitoring wells installed via a direct-push platform with an auger attachment will be the
hollow-stem auger rate rather than the direct-push platformrate.
An evaluation ofthirty-seven LUST sites revealed the following cost averages for
the components ofa monitoring well:
Material
Hollow-stem auger
Direct-push platform
PVC Screen 10-foot
$35.00
$30.00
8
PVC Riser 10-foot
$20.00
$15.00
Well Box
$87.00
$87.00
Bottom Cap
$9.00
$7.00
Locking Cap
$22.00
$18.00
Lock
$7.00
$7.00
Bailer/rope
$16.00
$14.00
Concrete
$10.00
$10.00
Sand
$70.00
$40.00
Bentonite
$45.00
$15.00
Incidentals
$9.00
$7.00
Total
$330.00
$250.00
The above averages are based on a monitoring well installed to a depth of20 feet below
ground surface.
The hollow-stem auger monitoring well is based on a 2-inch diameter
for the screen and riser.
The direct-push platform monitoring well is based on a ito
1.5-
inch diameter screen and riser.
The rates for the installation ofa monitoring well were
determined by dividing the totals
from the above table by 20 feet.
Section 732.820(c) Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Groundwater-recovery Wells
The rates for groundwater-recovery wells are included the Agency’s First Errata
Sheet to 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 732.
The maximum rates
listed in the following table would
be applicable based on the diameter ofthe finished recovery well:
Well Diameter
Maximum Total Amount
4 or 6 inches
$25.00/foot
8 inches or greater
$41.00/foot
9
The above rates include, but are not limited to, all costs for the installation ofa
groundwater recovery well except for costs associated with drilling or consultant
oversight ofthe drilling or monitoring well installation.
An evaluation of seven LUST sites
and extrapolation ofthe data for the 2-inch
monitoring well revealed the following values and cost averages for the components of a
groundwater-recovery well:
Material
4 or 6 inches
8 inches or greater
PVC Screen 10-foot
$65.00
$110.00
PVC Riser
10-foot
$40.00
$80.00
Well Box
$87.00
$87.00
Bottom Cap
$12.00
$12.00
Locking Cap
$23.00
$25.00
Lock
$7.00
$7.00
Bailer/rope
$16.00
$16.00
Concrete
$10.00
$10.00
Sand
$140.00
$280.00
Bentonite
$90.00
$180.00
Incidentals
$10.00
$13.00
Total
$500.00
$820.00
The above averages are based on a groundwater-recovery well installed to
a depth of20
feet below
ground surface.
The rates for the installation ofa groundwater-recoverywell
were determined by dividing the totals from the above table by 20 feet.
10
Section 732.820(d) Drilling, Well Installation, and Well Abandonment
Groundwater-monitoring Well Abandonment
The rates for groundwater-monitoring well abandonment are included in the Agency’s
First Errata Sheet to
35 Ill. Adm.
Code 732.
The regulations require that all
groundwater-
monitoring wells be abandonedpursuant to the regulations promulgatedby the Illinois
Department ofPublic Health at 77
Ill. Adm.
Code 920.120.
These regulations require that the
well be filled with a substance such as bentonite and that the top two feet ofthe well casingbe
removed.
The average cost to abandon a groundwater-monitoring well is
about $150.00.
The
average depth to which a groundwater-monitoring well is installed ranges from
15 to 20 feet
below ground.
Dividing the average abandonment cost by
15 feet, the allowable maximum
cost for abandoning a groundwater-monitoring well is
$10.00 per linear foot ofwell.
This rate
would not apply to groundwater-monitoring wells that were destroyed orremoved during an
excavation and were unable to
be properly abandoned.
Section 732.840(a) Replacement ofConcrete, Asphalt, or Paving; Destruction or
Dismantling and Reassembly ofAbove Grade Structures
The allowable maximum costs for paving or the replacement of asphalt or
concrete are listed in the table below.
The table establishes a rate based on the thickness
ofthe asphalt being applied to the site.
Depth ofReplacement Material
Maximum Total Amount per Square Foot
Two inches ofasphalt
$1.51
Three inches ofasphalt
$1.70
Four or more inches ofasphalt
$2.18
Any depth ofconcrete
$2.18
11
The above rate includes all costs associated with the replacement ofasphalt or concrete in
accordance with Section 732.605(a)(16).
The square foot rates for the installation of
asphalt are from the 2003 National Construction
Cost Estimator,
515t
Edition.
The
Agency proposes to use the same four or more inches ofasphalt rate forthe concrete rate.
Concrete installed at the same thickness typically costs about
1/3 more than asphalt;
therefore, the Agency believes the most cost-effective approach is to limit the amount of
concrete replacement by limiting the concrete rate to the four or more inches ofasphalt
rate.
Section 732.840(b) Replacement ofConcrete, Asphalt, orPaving; Destruction or
Dismantling and Reassembly ofAbove Grade Structures
The total cost for the destruction or the dismantling and reassembly of above
grade structures shall not exceed $10,000.00.
Please note that in the Agency’s First
Errata Sheet this limit is changed from $10,000 per site to
$10,000 per occurrence.
Costs
for these activities must be submitted to the Agency in a time and materials breakdown.
This
is a clarification ofa policy by which the Agencyhas always abided.
Doug Clay
willprovide additional testimony on this subject as he addresses Section 732.605(a)(17).
Section 732.845(a)(2) Professional Consulting Services
EarlyAction
The allowable maximum costs for fieldwork or oversight for early action shall not
exceed a total of $500.00 per half-day.
The Agency, based on conservation with the
Consulting Engineer Council ofIllinois (CECI), determined that fieldwork would be best
billed at a half-day rate.
The half-day rate is
5
hours ofwork at $80.00 per hour, the
average hourly wage (please refer to Mr. Chappel’s testimony for further information on
the average hourly wage) and the additional expenses listed in the table below.
12
Vehicle or Mileage
$30.00
Photo
Ionization Detector (PD)
$50.00
Miscellaneous Supplies
$20.00
The additional
expenses are one-half ofthe average daily rates the Agency typically sees
in budget and reimbursement claim submittals for the items listed
above.
The
miscellaneous supplies charge is to cover such things as gloves, sampling jars, plastic
bags, and all other incidental materials.
Subsection 732.845(a)(2)(A) allows for one half-day for UST removal oversight
and one half-day for each 250 cubic yards ofvisibly contaminated fill material removed
and disposed ofin accordance with 732.202(f).
Based on conversations with
underground storage tank removal contractors it appears that consultants are not always
present when the USTs are actually being removed.
Consultant participation during part
ofthe UST removal would be beneficial since soil
sampling from the limits ofthe
excavation is required pursuant to Section 732.202(h)(1).
Consultant oversight ofthe
removal ofcontaminated fill material is standard practice; most soils can be
excavated
into a truck via a
1
cubic yard backhoe at a rate of57 cubic yards per hour (2003 National
Construction Cost Estimator,
515t
Edition).
The rate was rounded down to 250 cubic
yards per half-day, or
5
hours, to
allow for a conservative estimate.
Subsection 732.845(a)(2)(B) allows for one half-day ofconsultant oversight for
every4 soil borings that are conducted as part ofmeasuring for the presence ofthe
release in accordance with Section 732.202(h)(2).
One half-day rate will apply to sites
where
1
to 4 soil borings are conducted, two half-day rates will be
applicable for sites
where
5
to 8 soil borings are conducted, and so on.
Based on conversations with former
13
members ofthe Agency’s drill rig team, 8 to
10 hollow-stem auger soil borings to a depth
of20 feet could be conducted within a one-day period of8 hours.
The half-day rate
allows for
5
hours per half-day for such things logging the boring,
collecting samples,
and
screening with
aPD while the boring is being advanced, and allows an additional
hour offield time that should account for travel time and/or any other incidental time that
is needed.
Subsection 732.845(a)(2)(C) allows for one half-day of consultant oversight if a
line release is repaired.
Line releases are typically repaired by a UST installation
contractor and the costs to repair the UST system are not reimbursable (Section
732.630(1));
however, the cost to
sample the soil while the repair is being conducted and
document the repair is an eligible remediation cost.
The Agency believes this work can
be conducted within the half-day time frame.
Section 732.845(a)(5) Professional Consulting Services
Free Product Removal
The allowable maximum costs for free product removal, fieldwork or field
oversight shall not exceed a total of $500.00 per half-day.
The number ofhalf-days shall
be determinedby the Agency on a site-specific basis.
Section 732.845(c)(2) Professional Consulting Services
Low Priority Corrective Action
Subsection 732.845(c)(2)
allows for one half-day ofconsultant fieldwork per-
groundwater sampling event.
The minimum requirements for low priority corrective
action requires the sampling of four groundwater monitoring wells quarterly the first
year, semi annually the second year, and annually the third year for a total ofseven
sampling events.
Based on the Agency’s experience, an event that consists
ofsampling
4
groundwater monitoring wells could be completed within the proposedhalf-day time
14
frame.
The
one half-dayper sampling event allows for
1
hour for each monitoring well
required to be
sampled and one additional hour for offield time that should
account for
travel time and/or any other incidental time that
is needed.
Section 732.845(d)(2) Professional Consulting Services
High Priority Corrective Action
Subsection 732.845(d)(2)(A) allows for one half-day for each 250 cubic yards of
contaminated soil removed and disposed.
The basis for this rate is
explained in the
paragraphs above for Subsection 732.845(a)(2)(A).
Section 732.APPENDIX E Personnel Titles and Rates
The appendix ofpersonnel titles and rates is designed to be used whenever
payment is allowed on a time and materials basis.
As noted in Agency testimony, there
are certain times when a site-specific time and materials budget orreimbursement claim
breakdown is warranted-for example alternate technology corrective action.
As part of
the time breakdown in the budget or reimbursement claim the maximum hourly rate for a
particular title is listed in Appendix E.
A consultant that proposes a time and material
budget must use the titles, and their personnel must be able to meet the title requirements
listed in Appendix E.
The reimbursed personnel rate is based on the task performed, not
necessarily the title ofthe person performing the task (e.g.,
the proper rate for a
Professional Engineer or Professional Geologist collecting a sample from a groundwater-
monitoring well is a technician rate, not a Professional Engineer or Professional
Geologist rate).
The consolidation oftitles used in the reimbursement process is
essential to
maintaining consistency in Agency reviews and to
expediting the review process.
The
Agency has counted
136 different titles used in budgets and reimbursement claims.
15
Appendix E, excluding the maximum hourly rates, the addition ofthe Draftspersori/CAD
titles and the clarification on the minimum years ofexperience, was prepared by CECI.
The maximum hourly rates arebased on the average rate the Agency has seen on
budgets and reimbursement claims submitted to the Agency.
The rates were then
rounded offand adjusted to
allow for Illinois license requirements and/or minimum years
ofexperience.
The average hourly rate and the number ofentries used to calculate the
average is as follows:
Title
Number ofEntries
AverageHourly Rate
Engineer
132
$78.25
Professional Engineer
205
$102.01
Geologist
174
$70.69
Professional
Geologist
150
$91.74
Scientist
115
$69.10
Project Manager
222
$85.00
Senior Project Manager
42
$94.24
Technician
391
$54.58
Account Technician
31
$50.80
Administrative Assistant
252
$37.13
Draftsperson/CAD
146
$51.51
16
Brian
P. Bauer
(217) 782-3335
EXPERIENCE:
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency,
Springfield, Illinois
Environmental Protection Specialist III,
April 1992 to
Present
In the Leaking Underground Storage
Tank Section:
•
Acted as the
technical
Project Manager for over 400 remediation
projects;
•
Reviewed over 600 Applications for Reimbursement from the LUST
Fund;
•
Was a member ofnumerous
committees that include drafting proposed
regulations, developing standardized budget reviews, and developing
standard wordprocessing documents;
•
Mentor new staff~
•
Temporarily assigned as a Unit Manager in the LUST Section (July
2001 through March 2002).
Design Ideas, Springfield Illinois
Production Manager, April
1991
to April
1992
Supervise the production and packaging ofproducts.
Superior National Forest,
Isabella,
Minnesota
ForestryAid, May 1989
to
August 1989
Main duties included stocking and survival surveys oftree plantations,
data calculation, recommendations for herbicidal spraying, and fire
fighting.
Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest,
Northbend, Washington
Trail Crew, May 1987
to August
1987
Main duties included trail maintenance, backcountry patrol, and trail
construction.
Payette National Forest, McCall,
Idaho
Trail Crew, May 1986 to August 1986
Main duties included trail maintenance, backcountry patrol, and trail
construction.
EDUCATION:
University
ofIllinois, Springfield, Illinois
Master ofArts in Environmental Studies,
Emphasis is Environmental Risk
Assessment,
1998
Northland College, Ashland, Wisconsin
Bachelor ofScience, Major: Biology, Minor: Earth Science,
1990
17
Oakton Community College, Des Plaines, Illinois
Associates ofArts, Major Liberal Arts,
1987
18
BEFORE THE ILLiNOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
iN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO
)
R04-022
REGULATION OF PETROLEUM
)
(Rulemaking
—
Land)
LEAKING UNDERGROUNI) STORAGE)
TANKS
(35
ILL.ADM. CODE 732)
)
TESTIMONY
OF
HARRY A CHAPPEL, P.E.
IN SUPPORT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S PROPOSAL TO
AMEND
35
ILL.
ADM.
CODE
732
My name is Harry Chappel.
I am a Unit Manager in the Leaking Underground Storage
Tank (UST) Section within the Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA).
I have been in my currentposition since March of2002.
I was employed by the Illinois
EPA from
1976 to
1995.
From
1995 to 2001
I was in private practice as a co-owner in two
environmental consulting firms located in Springfield, Illinois.
I was the Manager ofthe
Leaking UST Section from
1991
to 1994.
Ireceived a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the
University ofMissouri at Rolla in 1975 and a M.S. in Thermal and Environmental Engineering
from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale in 1979.
I have been a Registered Professional
Engineer in Illinois since 1979.
A copy ofmy current resume is provided as Attachment
1.
Today I will be testifying in support ofthe proposal to amend 35 Ill. Adm.
Code, Part
732.
This proposal is the result ofmodifications to the Illinois Environmental Protection Act by
Public Acts 92-0554 and 92-0735, and the need to reformthe current reimbursement procedures.
My testimony will focus on the following reimbursement requirements proposed in Subpart H of
Part 732:
732.800
Applicability
732.825
Soil Removal and Disposal
732.835
Sample Handling and Analysis
732.845
Professional Consulting Services
732.850
Payment on Time and Material Basis
732.855
Unusual or Extraordinary Expenses
732.865
Agency Review ofPayment Amounts
The remaining portions ofSubpart H will be discussed by Brian Bauer in his testimony.
732.800
-
Applicability
This section specifies that all reimbursable tasks and/or activities under Part 732 will be
limited to a maximum amount specified therein.
Illinois EPA has grouped
all activities which
maybe reimbursable into the following categories:
732.8 10
—
UST Removal or Abandonment
732.8 15
—
Free Product or Groundwater Removal and Disposal
732.820
—
Drilling, Well Installation and Abandonment
732.825
—
Soil Removal and Disposal
732.830
—
Drum Disposal
732.835
—
Sample Handling and Analysis
732.840
—
Replacement ofPaving; Above Grade Structures
732.845
—
Professional
Consulting Services
732.850
—
Time and Material Payments
732.855
—
Unusual or Extraordinary Expenses
732.860
—
Handling Charges
2
In support ofthese proposed allowable amounts, I have attached copies ofallowable
amounts from other states with similar programs.
These attachments are as follows:
Attachment 2
—
Summary ofInformation
Attachment 3
—
Arizona
Attachment 4— Indiana
Attachment
5
—
Colorado
Attachment 6
—
Texas
Attachment 7— Oklahoma
Attachment 8
—
South Carolina
732.825
—
Soil Removal and Disposal
The Illinois EPA is proposing to allow a maximum of$57.00 per cubic yard for soil
excavation, transportation and disposal costs.
Attachment 9 provides a summary ofrandomly
selected projects, which were reviewed in developing this figure.
The $57 per cubic yard figure
proposed in the regulations is the sum ofthe cost to excavate, transport and dispose ($47.58) plus
one standard deviation ($8.22), rounded up to $57
to
allow forincidental expenses.
The Illinois
EPA is proposing $20/cubic yard be allowed for backfill costs.
The $20/cubic yard figure is the
sum ofthe costs to backfill ($15.89) plus one
standard deviation ($4.38), rounded to the nearest
whole dollar.
The Illinois EPA is proposing separate amounts for these activities since the
amount of soil excavated and disposed does not always equal the amount ofbackfill required.
The Illinois EPA has historically allowed
$55
per cubic yard for excavation, transportation, and
disposal of contaminated soil.
3
These costs include all equipment, personnel, trucking and disposal fees.
They do not
include a consultant’s oversight ofthe removal operation.
To determine the volume ofsoil,
a simple volume calculation is provided in the proposal.
To
account forthe fact that the in-place volume
is less than the excavated volume ofsoil, a
“fluff’ factor of
5
percent has been added to
the equation.
This
5
percent allowance applies to
excavation, transportation, disposal, and backfill volumes.
Also, the conversion factor for
converting tons to cubic yards has been
specified.
This conversion factoris also proposed for
early action excavation amounts specified in Appendix C ofthe amended rules.
Likewise, the volume ofbackfill allowed to be reimbursed has been specified.
The $20
per cubic yard figure again includes materials, trucking, equipment and personnel.
This figure
does not include costs for a consultant’s oversight ofthe operation.
There will be situations where soil at the excavation may not be contaminated, but must
be removed to access the contaminated soil.
A cost per cubic yard to excavate, stockpile and
replace this soil hasbeen specified to
account for these situations.
This $6.50 per cubic yard
figure was obtained from the 2003 National Construction Cost Estimator,
51st
Edition.
732.835
—
Sampling Handling and Analysis
Proposed Appendix D will set the maximum amounts to be reimbursed for various
chemical
and physical tests on soil and groundwater.
The Illinois EPA met with the Illinois
Association ofEnvironmental Laboratories
(LkEL) regarding. reasonable reimbursement amounts
for these types oftests.
In response to the Agency’s request, the IAEL provided a survey of
5
labs which is included in Attachment 10.
The IAEL suggested the Illinois EPA use the highest
ratereported by any ofthe
5
laboratories.
The Illinois EPA rejected this approach.
The Illinois
4
EPA instead opted to use the average amounts provided on the IAEL data contained in
Attachment 10.
Attachment 11
breaks down how the average amounts provided in Appendix D
were calculated from the IAEL data.
The following variations from the IAEL data should also
be noted:
1.
The cost per sample for chemical
oxygen demand (COD) was based on the
IAEL data for the biological oxygen demand (BOD)
test.
It was assumed the cost for
these two tests would be similar.
A cost for BOD has not been provided in Appendix D
as this test is not required in most UST applications;
2.
Dollar amounts on the IAEL table (Appendix
10) were rounded to the next
higher total dollar amount;
3.
A cost for“hon Total Soil” is included in the Illinois EPA proposal that
is
not on the IAEL spreadsheet.
The cost ofthis test was assumed to
be equal to the test for
“hon TCLP Soil,” or $10;
4.
The geotechnical cost for porosity and soil
classification are based on
historical results from previous budgets and billing packages reviewed by the Illinois
EPA.
The average cost for a porosity test was
$30.
The average cost for soil
classification was $68.
732.845
—
Professional Consulting Services
This section provides limits for the fees that consultants may be reimbursed fbrvarious
tasks conducted as part ofLeaking UST remediation.
The Illinois EPA has coordinated with the
Consulting Engineers Council ofIllinois (CECI) to develop the activities that are conducted by
the consultant in each step ofthe process and the estimated personnel time (hours) required for
5
each activity within a task.
Once the hours required to perform a task and/or activitywere
determined, the Illinois
EPA developed
an average hourly rate to establish the limits specified in
this section.
The Illinois EPA developed an average hourly rate by reviewing the historical
records ofthe Illinois
EPA for previous reimbursements.
By averaging the maximum hourly
rates for each title in Appendix E ofthe proposed rules, an average hourly rate of $81.25/hour is
derived as follows:
Appendix E
Engineer
$130.00
Geologist
$110.00
Scientist
$85.00
Project Manager
$100.00
Technician
$65.00
Account Technician
$55.00
Administrative Assistant
$45.00
Draftsperson
$60.00
Staff Engineer
--
Staff Geologist
--
Total
$650.00
Average
$81.25/hour
In addition, the Illinois EPArandomly.selected 19 reimbursement requests to review in
an attempt to determine ifthe rate was reasonable.
This information is summarized in
Attachment 12.
This data would indicate an average rate for consultant services around
$68/hour.
Using this information, the Illinois
EPA determined an average hourly personnel cost of
$80/hour would be used for budgetingpurposes.
This figure is roughly 15
higher than the
average derived from the reimbursement requests summarized in Attachment 12.
Unless stated
otherwise in the testimony for specific sections, a workday often hours was assumed.
The limits
specified include all costs incurred by a consultant forcompleting the specified activity,
6
including, but not limited to, project planning and
oversight, travel, per diem, mileage,
transportation, lodging, all miscellaneous equipment, as well as the preparation ofplans, reports,
applications for payment and other documentation.
There will be no
additional monies provided
if multiple submittals are required to provide the required information.
For.example, a
consultant maybe reimbursed up to $4,800 for thepreparation and submission ofthe 20-Day and
45-DayReports, and any amendments or revisions to those reports.
The hours estimated for the various activities discussed were derived in consultation with
the Consulting Engineers Council of Illinois (CECI).
a.
Early Action
—
the proposed fee (allowed if the consultant is involved with
the preparation for the abandonment orremoval ofUSTs) is derived as follows:
Personnel —12 hours x $80/hour
=
$960.00
20 and 45-Day Reports
—
the proposed fee for preparation ofthe 20-Day and 45-
Day Reports is derived as follows:
Personnel —60 hours x $80/hour
$4,800.00
Free Product Reports
—
the proposed fee is for initial site visit and preparing a
Free Product Report for submittal.
The fee is derived as follows:
Personnel —2 people x
1
day x
10 hour day x $80/hour
=
$1,600.00
Free Product Recovery Systems
—
the cost for design,
installation, and operation
ofFree Product Recovery Systems will be determined based on a time and material basis,
in accordance with proposed Section 732.850.
7
The final proposed fee specified under this section allows $500
for a Professional
Engineer’s closure certification, if remediation is complete following early action
activities.
This fee is derived as follows:
2
hours x
$130/hour
=
$260.00
The remaining $240
is to cover the additional costs for clerical support, preparation and
submittal ofthe Owner/Operator Summary form and recording fees for the No Further
Remediation Letter.
b.
Site Evaluation and Classification
—
Consulting fees for site classification
pursuant to Section 732.307 (Method
1
and Method 2) include preparation ofthe Site
Classification Plan, oversight ofthe fieldwork and preparation ofthe Site Classification
Completion Report.
To develop this fee the Illinois EPA reviewed 32 reimbursement
requests containing personnel
costs forMethod
1
and 2 site classifications.
Attachment
13
is a summary ofthe data developed and provides the proposed average cost of
$9,870.00 for these two methods ofsite classification.
Owners/operators choosing to
classify using Section 732.312 will propose personnel budgets based on a time and
materials breakdown under 732.850.
c.
Low Priority Corrective Action
—
The consultant fees allowed for low
priority corrective action are derived as follows:
Monitoring Plan
40 hours x $80/hour
=
$3,200~
1st Year Report
32 hours x $80/hour
$2,560
2uid
Year Report
32 hours x $80/hour
=
$2,560
Completion Report 32 hours x $80/hour
=
$2,560
Total
=
$10,880
8
Consultant
fees for low priority field oversight and monitoring will be discussed by Mr.
Bauer.
d.
Corrective Action
—
the corrective action requirements will consist ofthe
preparation of the Corrective ActionPlan (CAP) and Budget,the
field work associated
with conducting corrective action, the preparation ofthe Corrective Action Completion
Report (CACR) and all reimbursement requests.
For conventional technology the rules
establish set fees for these activities.
The fees established for the office work involved in
developing the conventional technology
CAP
and Budget, the CACR and reimbursement
submittals for conventional technology, and a CACR for alternative technologies are
derived as follows:
64 hours x $80/hour
$5,120
The fees established for the consultant’s field work will be discussed by Mr. Bauer.
The consultant fee reimbursement amount for alternative technologies will be
based on a time and material justification, which will be discussed later.
A consultant would not be entitled
to the $5,120 for CAP preparation if no active
remediation will occur.
For example, if,
following site investigation, the CAP consists
only ofplacing
asphalt over the remaining contamination and performing a Part 742
model, the reimbursement proposing to use only Part 742 (TACO) barriers, models, and
institutional controls would be limited to $800 732.845(c)(3)
plus the Corrective Action
Completion Report (CACR) costs of$5,120 for a total of$5,920 for the CAP
and CACR.
9
Additional monies havebeenallowed for the consultant’s development of Tier2
or Tier
3 remediation objectives under
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code 742 and
the
preparation of
Environmental LandUse ControlsandHighway AuthorityAgreements as follows:
10 hours x $80/hour
=
$800.00
732.850
—
Payment onTime andMaterial Basis
In developing thereimbursement amountsunder SubpartH the Agency realizedthere
were activities for which a specific set feecould not be developed. This sectionofSubpartH
provides a method for developing a budget and reimbursement amount for such activities.
The
estimatedbudgets and reimbursement amounts for the activities will be based on a time and
materials basis for each site.
For example, the development and
implementation of CAPs
proposing alternative technologies will require a breakdown ofall proposed activities which do
not have set amounts previously established (e.g.,
analytical costs
listed in Appendix D).
It
should be
noted the cost for the alternative technology proposal cannot exceed the cost for
conventional technologyorbe substantiallyhigher thanother available alternative technologies.
All plans andbudgets will bereviewed for reasonableness.
Section 732.855
—
Unusual or Extraordinary
Expenses
This section provides an opportunity for an owner/operator to demonstrate their site.
presents unusual or extraordinary circumstances. Iftheowner or operatorcan demonstrate such
circumstances to the Agency, theAgency canallow exceedances ofthe SubpartH amounts on a
site-specific basis.
Section 732.865
—
Increase inMaximum Payment Amounts
10
Section 732.865 is amended in the Agency’s First Errata Sheet. As amended, this section
will increase the amounts set forth in Subpart H every year based on inflation. The amount ofthe
increase is based upon the annual Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National Product and will be
published by the Agency on, or before, July
1 ofeach year on the Agency’s web site. The annual
adjustment may not exceed
5
in any one year, and the first adjustment will be effective July
1,
2006.
In addition, as always,
the Agency or anyone else may propose changes to the rules at any
time as needed.
The inflation factor used
by the Agency in reviewing budget proposals will be based on
the amounts in effect on the date the budgetwas received. For billing
packages not based on an
approved budget, the maximum allowable amounts will be based on the date the
costs were
incurred.
HAC:jk\Testimony732.doc
11
ATTACHMENT
1
HARRY A. CHAPPEL,
P.E.
HOME PHONE: 217-529-6330
144 LACONW000
WORK PHONE: 217-785-3913
SPRINGFIELD, IL
62707
OVERVIEW
Over twenty seven years ofexperience in environmental engineering and
management.
Includes work with State and Federal laws, regulations and guidance in
the areas ofwater
pollution, solid waste, hazardous waste, and leaking underground storage tanks.
Established
the Underground Storage Tank Section
in the Bureau of Land at the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency. This Section grew from a unit of four personnel to a
staffof over fifty. The budget for this Section exceeded fifteen million dollars annually.
Six years
spent in private practice as an environmental
consultant and small business
owner. Responsibilities included client relations, job estimating, invoicing, payroll,
personnel, project design, engineering management, and project management.
WORK EXPERIENCE
Private Practice
12/99 to
7/01
Vice President and co-owner of Inland/Chappel Environmental, a
Division of Inland Environmental, Inc.
5/95 to
12/99
Vice President and co-owner ofCSD Environmental Services, Inc.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
3/02
to
Present
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, Unit Manager, Leaking
Underground Storage Tank Section,
Bureau of Land
7/01
to 3/02
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Permit Review
Engineer,
Permit Section,
Bureau of Land
9/94
to
5/95
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
—
Manager, Hazardous
Waste Branch, Permit
Section, Bureau of Land
6/90 to 9/94
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Manager, Leaking
Underground Storage Tank Section, Bureau of Land
2/87 to
6/90
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Manager, Compliance
Section, Bureau of Land
4/83 to 2/87
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Unit Manager, Permit
Section, Bureau ofLand
12/79
to 4/83
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Manager, Permit
Section, Mine Pollution Control
Program
9/78 to
12/79
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Permit Review
Engineer,
Permit Section,
Mine Pollution Control
Program
2/76 to
9/78
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Permit Review
Engineer,
Permit Section, Bureau of Water
12/75
Graduated from University of Missouri ~
Rolla
HARRY A. CHAPPEL, P.E.
HOME PHONE: 217-529-6330
144 LACONWOOD
WORK PHONE: 217-785-3913
SPRINGFIELD, IL
62707
EDUCATION
B.S.
—
Civil Engineering,
University of Missouri ~
Rolla, December
1975
M.S.
—
Thermal & Environmental Engineering, Southern
Illinois University
@
Carbondale, June 1979
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer
IL #062-03895
(current)
MO #EN 028019
(inactive)
OH #E
63580
(inactive)
Asbestos
#100-7207
Management Planner, Project Designer, and
Inspector (current)
AWARDS
Certificate of Commendation
-
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency
-
1995
Certificate of Appreciation
—
Bureau ofLand
—
1995
H:\HAC\ RESUME &
CM5
INFO\JtESUME
08.20.02.doc
ATTACHMENT
2
STATE SUMMARIES
JULY 2003
PERSONNEL
STATE
$/HOUR
ADMINISTRATIVE
AZ
$45.00
PRINCIPAL LEVEL
AZ
$120.00
WORD PROC/CLERICAL
IND
$28.00
PRINCIPAL
IND
$110.00
WORD PROCESSOR
AZ
$39.00
PRINCIPAL
TEX
$110.00
WORD PROCESSOR
TEX
$35.00
PRINCIPAL
OK
$100.00
CLERICAL
OK
$35M0
SENIOR LEVEL
AZ
$103.00
SR. PROJ. MGR.
INO
$102.00
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
TEX
$110.00
SEN. ENGR.IGEOL
TEX
$95.00
PROJECT LEVEL
AZ
$88.00
PROJECT MANAGER
IND
$83.00
PROJECT MANAGER
TEX
$80.00
ASSOC. ENGRJGEOL.
TEX
$85.00
PROJECT
MANAGER
OK
$75.00
STAFF
LEVEL
AZ
$74.00
STAFF
PROJ.
PERS.
IND
$70.00
STAFF
GEOLOG/ENOR
TEX
$70.00
FIELD LEVEL
AZ
$62.00
SR. TECHNICIAN
IND
$55.00
FIELD LEVEL
TEX
$65.00
FILED TECH
OK
$45.00
TECHNICAL (CAD,ETC.)
AZ
$55.00
DRAFTING
IND
$35.00
DRAFTING
TEX
$22.5 -$50
(DIFFERENT LEVELS)
DRAFTING
OK
$45.00
TECHNICIAN
IND
$38.00
STATE SUMMARIES
JULY 2003
UST REMOVAL
UNDER
1000 GAL
IND
PER TANK
$1,000.00 (IND ADDS $1.34/TON
FOR LOADING
1000 TO 4999 GAL
IND
PER TANK
$1,500.00 AND $37/MILE
FOR TRANSPORT)
5000 TO
10000 GAL
IND
PER TANK
$2,000.00
10000
GAL
IND
PER TANK
$2,500.00
OR
=
4000 GAL.
AZ
PER TANK
$5,852.00 (AZ ADDS $4 TO $12/MILE
FOR TRANSPORT
AZ
ADDL TANK
$2,978.00 DEPENDING ON SIZE OF TANK)
4000’CX’clSOOO GAL
AZ
PER TANK
$11,163.00
AZ
ADDL TANK
$5,722.00
15000 GAL
AZ
PER TANK
$12,83&0O
AZ
ADDL TANK
$7,988.00
5000 GAL
OR LESS
TEX
PER TANK
$1,000.00 (MAX $8,000)
GREATER TI-IAN 5000 GAL
TEX
PER TANK
$2,000.00 (MAN $8,000)
BORINGS
HOLLOW STEM AUGER
AZ
PER FT.
$22.00
AIR ROTARY
AZ
PER FT.
$38.00
16
FT
IND
PER FT.
$20.00
16 TO 26 FEET
IND
PER FT.
$25.00
26
FT
IND
PER FT.
$30.00
2 INCH AUGER
COLO
PER FT.
$16.41
4 INCH AUGER
COLO
PER FT.
$19.15
2 INCH ROTARY
COLO
PER FT.
$21.06
2 INCH ROTARY
COW
PER FT.
$21.35
2 INCH
HOLLOW ST.
TEX
0 -25 FT
$775.00
($31/FT @25 FT)
10 INCH
OK
PER FT.
$21.00
(+MOB, +DECON, +MILEAGE)
PUSH-PULL PROBE
OK
PER DAY
$1,400.00
(+MOB, ÷DECON,
+MILEAGE)
BORING (PUSH
OR DRILL)
SC
PER FT.
$17.00
(+MOB)
STATE SUMMARIES
JULY 2003
WELLS
2 INCH HOLLOW STEM
AZ
PER FT.
$38.00
4 INCH HOLLOW STEM
AZ
PER
FT.
$47.00
2 INCH AIR ROTARY
AZ
PER
FT.
$54.00
4 INCH AIR ROTARY
AZ
PER FT.
$63.00
2 INCH
IND
PER FT.
$10.00
4 INCH
IND
PER FT.
$12.00
2 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$15.14
4 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$21.67
2 INCH
TEX
0-25
FT
$1025.00 ($41/FT @25 FT) INCLUDES BORING
4 INCH
TEX
0- 25FT
$1,187.50 ($47.5/FT @25
FT) INCLUDES BORING
2 INCH OR 4 INCH
OK
PER FT.
$32.00
(+MOB, +DECON, *MILEAGE)
DIRECT PUSH
TEX
PER FOOT
$12.50
(195
FT
IN
10 HOUR DAY)
DIRECT PUSH
TEX
PER DAY
$1,480.00 (195
FT IN
10 HOUR
DAY)
ABANDON 2 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$7.47
ABANDON 4 INCH
COLO
PER FT.
$11.08
0-25
FEET DEEP
TEX
PER WELL
$300.00
ANY WELL
OK
PER WELL
$300.00 (+MOB, +DECON,
+MILEAGE)
WELL INSTALL
SC
PER FT.
$38.00
(+MOB)_
STATE SUMMARIES
REMEDIATION
EXCAVATION
EXCAVATION
EXCAVATION
AZ
IND
TEX
$/CY
$/CY
$/CY
JULY 2003
TRANSPORT
TRANSPORT
TRANSPORT
AZ
IND
TEX
$/CY
$/CY
$/CY
$12.00
(1.5 TON/CY)
$0.90
(1.5 TON/C?)
$14.00
SOIL DISPOSAL
TEX
$/CY
$45.00
BACKFILL & COMPACTION
BACKFILL
& COMPACTION
DISPOSAL
DISPOSAL
SOIL TREAT/DISP
$13.35
(1.5 TON/C?)
$20.00
($11- BACKFILL
=
$9 COMPACT)
10.5
(CI500TPH)
$45.00
(I500TPH)
$33.33
($50/TON) (+MOB)
BACKFILL
-
STONE
BACKFILL
-
SOIL
DRUM DISPOSAL
-
SOIL
DRUM DISPOSAL
-
SOIL
DRUM DISPOSAL
-
SOIL
DRUM DISPOSAL
-
WATER
AZ
PER DRUM
AZ
PER DRUM
OK
1ST DRUM
OK
1ST DRUM
$200.00
($65
EACH ADD. DRUM)
$200.00
($2/GALLON THEREAFTER)
FLUID DISPOSAL
TEX
TEX
OK
PER GAL
PER HOUR
PER GAL
$0.40
$75.00
$0.45
$11.00
$t50
$9.00
AZ
TEX
$/CY
$/CY
IND
LFRATES
TEX
TEX
$ICY
$/CY
SC
$/CY
IND
IND
$/CY
$/CY
$8.67
(1.5 TONICY)
$434
(1.5 TON/C?)
$308.00
$134.00
INDADDS $.26/CY/MILE
VAC TRUCK
ATTACHMENT
3
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
State Assurance
Fund 2003 Cost Ceilings
Cost
Ceiling
2003 coft
Item
Ceiling
Code
Item
Description
Unit of Measure
Amount
*
T & Nt
=
Time &
Material
Detail.
See 2003
Cost
Ceiling
Descriptions.
SUPPLEMENTAL UNIT
RATES
PERSONNEL RATES
1
Professional
Services Rates:
Principal Level
S/flour
$124
2
Professional
Services Rates:
Senior Level
S/flour
$107
3
Professional
Services Rates:
Project Level
S/Hour
$91
4
Professional
Services Rates:
Staff Level
S/Hour
$76
S
Professional
Services Rates:
Field
Level
S/Hour
$64
6
Professional
Services Rates:
Technical
Personnel (Computer Included)
S/flour
$56
7
Professional
Services Rates:
Administrative Assistant
S/Hour
$47
8
Professional
Services Rates:
Word
Processor (Computer Included)
S/flour
$40
CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACTING PERSONNEL
RATES
9
Construction/Contracting
Services Rates:
Construction Field Supervisor
S/Hour
$8
10
ConstructioniContracting Services Rates:
Skilled
Laborer
S/Hour
$5
I
II
ConstructioniContracting Services
Rates:
Unskilled Laborer
S/Hour
S40
Construction/Contracting Services Rates:
Equipment Operator
12
(Avg. Rate to Operate a Std.
Piece of Equip)
SIHour
$60
PER DIEM RATES
13
J
Per Diem Requirement
(~
Miles Required)
4
50 Miles
14
Fieldwork Per Diem_Without_Overnight
Stay
S/Day
$40
15
Fieldwork Per Diem
With
Overnight Stay (lacE Lodging)
L
S/Day
$106
CONSULTANT MILEAGE
RATE
16
Consultant Mileage Rate (single
person)
S/Mile
$2
17
Consultant Mileage Rate
(two
persons)
S/Mile
$4
PROJECT SET-UP AND ADMINISTRATION
18
Initial Project Set-up
Lump Sum
$~
015
19
Previously
Assessed Project Review
Lump Sum
$~,873
20
Agency Data Analysis
Lump Sum
$1,586
21
Site Reconnaissance and
Field
Receptor
Survey FI/4 Mile
Lump Sum
$1,612
22
Agency
Receptor
Survey jl/4
Mild
Lump Sum
$1,016
23
Historical Research
Lump Sum
$1,363
24
Pursuit of Off-Site Access Agreement with
a Private
Entity
Only
Lump
Sum
$1,260
Page iota
WORK PLAN PREPARATION
L
r
25
Approved
Site Characterization
Work Plan Scenario
1:
Soil Only
1
26
LApproved Site Characterization Work Plan Scenario
2:
Soil and
Groundwater
L
27
Jjnitial Health and
Safety Plan
S/Report
J
$3,980
S/Report
$5,206
S/Report
$703
REMEDIAL PLANS
28
ADEQ-Approved CAP for Active Remedial Treatment
Per CAP
$7,095
29
ADEQ-Approved CAP for Natural Attenuation
Per CAP
$6,866
30
Pre-Built_Remedial_Engineering_Design
Per Design
$5,983
31
Consultant Preparation of SAF Work Plan to Implement approved CAP
Per Plan
$3,809
32
Remediation
Health & Safety Plan
Per Plan
$1,153
FIELD ACTIVITIES
33
Consultant’s Full Day Rate
DO NOT USE
I
-
34
Consultant’s Half Day Rate
DO NOT USE
CONTRACTOR UST REMOVAL AND CLOSURE
L
~
LContractor Mobilization/Demobilization
Per
Event
$720
36
Contractor Mobilization/Demobilization Incremental Travel
Rate
Per Mile
$5
37
Contractor Daily Travel Costs
Per Mile
$5
UST REMOVAL
38
One UST
Less than or Equal to 4,000-gallons
Per Tank
$6,047
39
Cost for Each Additional Tank
Per Tank
$3,077
40
One UST Greater than 4,000-gallons
and
Less than or Equal to
15,000-gallons
Per Tank
$11,556
41
Cost for Each Additional Tank
Per Tank
S5,9 13
42
One UST Greater than 15,000-gallons
PerTank
$13,265
-43
Cost for Each Additional Tank
Per Tank
$8,254
OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION OF TANKS
44
One UST
Less Than or Equal
to
4,000-gallons
T & M
45
Cost for Each Additional Tank
T & M
46
One UST Greater than 4,000-gallons
and
Less than or Equal to *5,000-gallons
T & M
47
Cost for Each Additional Tank
‘T & M
48
One UST Greater than 15,000-gallons
*T & M
49
Cost for Each Additional Tank
T & NI
CONTRACTOR DRILLING-RELATED ACTIVITIES
SOIL BORING AND
SAMPLING Mobilization/Demobilization
1
Page 2 of 8
50
Hollow
Stem Auger Drilling
Method
Per Event
$515
51
All
other
Drilling Methods
Per Event
$611
SOIL BORING ANDSAMPLING TRAVEL RATE
52
hollow Stem Auger Drilling
Method
Per Mile
$4
53
All
other
Drilling
Methods
Per Mile
$5
54
Soil Boring and Sampling Travel Rate
Per Mile
$4
SOIL BORING AND SAMPLING
55
Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Method-Vertical Boring
Per
Foot
$22
56
Hollow
Stem
Auger Drilling Method-AngleBoring
Per
Foot
$29
57
Limited
Access Drilling Method-Vertical
Boring
Per Foot
$37
58
Air_Rotary_Drilling Method-Vertical_Boring
Per Foot
$39
59
Rotosonic
Drilling Method-Vertical Boring
Per Foot
$43
60
Dual Wall Percussion Drilling Method-Vertical Boring
Per Foot
$42
61
Dual WaIl Percussion Drilling Method-Angle Boring
Per Foot
$60
62
Soil Boring Abandonment by Grout jail boring diameters
Per Foot
$11
CONTRACTOR STANDBY RATE
63
Hollow Stem
Auger
‘T &
M
64
All Other Rig Types
T & M
CONTRACTOR WELL INSTALLATION-RELATEDACTIVITIES
WELL INSTALLATION
65
2
inch Hollow Stem Auger
Per
Foot
$39
66
4-inch Hollow Stem Auger
Per Foot
$49
67
6-inch Hollow
Stem Auger
Per Foot
$68
68
2-inch Air Rotary
Per Foot
$56
69
4-inch Air Rotary
Per Foot
$65
70
6-inch Air Rotary
Per Foot
$87
71
2-inch Rotosonic
Per Foot
$63
72
4-inch Rotosonic
Per Foot
$66
73
6-inch Rotosonic
Per Foot
$82
74
2-inch Dual Wall
Percussion
Per Foot
$58
75
4-inch Dual Wall Percussion
Per Foot
$69
76
6-inch Dual Wall Percussion
Per Foot
$89
77
Surface
Completion
/ Access Vault
=
12”
S/Well
$307
78
Surface
Completion / Access Vault 12”
to =24”
s/Well
$518
MONITOR WELL DEVELOPMENT
79
Contractor Mobilization/Demobilization
Per Event
$499
SO
Contractor Travel Cost
PerMile
$3
SI
2-inch Monitor Welk
Depth to Water
Less Than
100
Feet
S/Well
$484
82
2-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Than 100 Feet
S/Well
$601
Page
3
of8
83
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Less Than
100
Feet
S/Well
$523
84
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Than
100 Feet
S/Well
$630
85
6-Inch Monitor Well: Depth
to Water Less Than
100 Feet
S/Well
$642
86
6-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Than
100 Feet
S/Well
$739
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING
-
RELATED ACTIVITIES
87
Consultant Make Ready
T & M
88
Groundwater Monitoring Field Equipment Day Rate Purgingi
T & M
89
Groundwater Monitoring Field Equipment
Day
Rate (Non-Purgingj
T & M
90
2-inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Less Than 100
Feet (Purging
‘T &
M
91
2-Inch MonitorWell: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Than
100
Feet
jPurgingj
•T &
M
92
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Less
Than 100
Feet Purgingi
T & M
93
4-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Than 100
Feet
jPurging(
—
•T & M
‘T & M
94
6-Inch MonitorWell: Depth to Water Less Than
100
Feet ~Purging)
95
6-Inch Monitor Well: Depth to Water Equal To or Greater Than 100
Feet
Purging
•T & M
96
Investigative Sampling Methodology
(Purging is not required( Alldepths to
water
•T & M
97
Consultant Fluid Lent Monitoring
T & M
98
Free Product Removal
Via Hand
Bailing or Hand Pumping
T &
M
99
Free Product Removal Via
Dedicated Removal Device
T & M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY TESTING
IOU
Aquifer Pump Test
T & M
101
Aquifer Slug Test
T & M
102
Soil Vapor Extraction Test
*T & M
103
SVE/Air Sparge Test
T & M
104
Hioremediation Test
T & M
REMEDLATION
ACTIVITIES
105
Remedial Excavation
Per Cubic Yard
$12
106
Bulk Soil Transportation
*T & M
107
Backfill
and Compaction Excavation
S/Ton
$20
108
Containerized Contaminated Water Disposal
Per Drum
$139
109
Containerized Contaminated Soil Disposal
Per Drum
$318
110
Waste Characterization
*
T & M
Ill
Landfill
Disposal of Petroleum Contaminated Soil (PCS)
Thermal Remediation of PCS (Ex-Situ, On-Site, Portable Facility)
S/Ton
$40
112
S/Ton
$54
113
Thermal Remediation ofPCS (Ex-Situ, Off-Site, Fixed
Facility)
S/Ton
$34
114
Bioremediation of PCS (Off-Site, Fixed Facility)
S/Ton
$36
115
Construction
and Installation
ofSoil and/orGroundwater Remedial System
DO NOT USE
116
Consultant Cost: Remediation System Operation and Maintenance
S/Month
$2,142
REPORTING ACTIVITIES
Page
4 ole
Ill
114-Day
Release Confirmation Report
J
Per Report
I
$ssi
ADEQ-APPROVED STANDARD SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT (SCR)
118
ADEQ-Approved 5CR; Up To 4 Soil Borings
S/Report
$4,170
119
ADEQ-Approved
Standard SCR; Incremental Cost Increase Per Soil Boring
S/Boring
$291
120
ADEQ-Approved Standard 5CR; UpTo
4 Groundwater Monitor Wells
S/Report
$5j8l
121
ADEQ-Approved
Standard SCR; Incremental
Cost Increase
Per Groundwater Monitor Well
S/Well
$320
122
ADEQ-Approved Standard SCR
Up to 4 Soil
Borings and
4 Groundwater Monitor Wells
S/Report
$6,012
REMEDIAL REPORTS
123
First Periodic Groundwater Monitoring Report:
Up to
4 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
(Includes first sampling event)
S/Report
$2,458
124
Initial
Periodic Monitoring Report; Incremental
Cost for Each Additional
Groundwater Monitor
Well
Per Well
$183
125
Subsequent Groundwater Monitoring Report: Up To 4 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
(Includes_subsequent_sampling events)
S/Report
$1,625
126
Subsequent Periodic Monitoring Report;
Incremental Cost for Each Additional
Groundwater Monitor Well
Per Well
$159
127
Initial
Remedial Progress Report (Soil
and Groundwater)
S/Report
$2,846
128
Subsequent Remedial Progress Report (Soil
and Groundwater)
S/Report
$2,025
129
Post Remediation Closure Report
S/Report
$3,803
130
Site De-Commissioning Letter Report
S/Report
$1320
SAF APPLICATION PREPARATION
131
Pre-approval
Application
Per Application
$1,001
132
Reimbursement/Direct
Pay Application (Less than or
Equal to
2 PrimaryInvoices
Per Application
$919
133
Reimbursement/Direct Pay Application (Greater than
2
Less than or Equal to
5 Primary
Invoicesi
Per Application
$1,108
134
Reimbursement/Direct
Pay Application (Greater than or Equal to 6 Primary Invoices)
Per Application
$1,348
EQUIPMENT RENTAL RATES
135
SVE
System with
Thermal Oxidizer (100 cfm)
S/Month
$3,224
136
SVE
System with Thermal Oxidizer (250
cfm)
S/Month
$3,962
137
SVE
System with Thermal Oxidizer (500
cfm)
S/Month
$4,587
138
SVE
System With Thermal Oxidizer (700 cfmj
S/Month
$5,515
139
SVE
System with Catalytic Oxidizer
(100 cfm)
$/Month
$3,261
140
SVE
System with Catalytic Oxidizer
(250 cfm)
S/Month
$4,206
141
SVE
System with Catalytic Oxidizer
(500 cfm)
S/Month
$4,995
142
AirSpargeSystem
lup to 100 cfm and
upto 12 psil
S/Month
$1,013
143
Air Sparge System
jup to 100 tIm and
13 psi to 100 psi
S/Month
$1,278
144
SVE/Air Sparge Portable Pilot Test Unit
T &
M
145
Blower,
160 CFM
S/Month
L
$1,040
146
Blower, 280 CFM
S/Month
$1,333
147
Manual-Operated
Hand Auger Sampling Kit (Hand Auger/Brass Sleeves)
S/Day
$67
Page
5 of 8
148
Iso
Gallon DOT-approved Drum
I
S/Drum
$59
~
LABORATORY RATES
MOBILE LABORATORY RATES
149
Mobile Lab Mobilization/Demobilization Rate for a One Person Crew
Per Event
$561
150
Mobile Lab Mobilization/Demobilization Rate for a Two Person Crew
Per Event
$390
151
Mobile Lab- Mobilization/Demobilization Incremental Travel Rate for
a One
Person Crew
Per Mile
$2
152
Mobile Lab
-
Mobilization/Demobilzation Incremental Travel Rate for a Two
Person Crew
Per Mile
$2
153
On-Site Mobile Lab
Rate for a
One Person
Crew (Includes Soil and
GW analyses)
5/j-iour
$174
154
On-Site Mobile Lab
Rate for a
Two Person Crew(Includes Soil and
GW analyses)
S/flour
S259
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
155
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
(TPH) by
ADHS Method 418.1 AZ (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$71
156
Hydrocarbons
by
ADHS Method S0ISAZRI (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$94
j
Hydrocarbons
by ADHS Method 8OI5AZRI-Modified (Air Only)
157
S/Sample
$107
158
~Hydrocarbons/8TEX
by EPA Method 8OISAZRI(Moditiedl/8021B (Air Only)
S/Sample
$129
159
160
161
162
Aromatic
VOC’s (BTEX) By EPA Method 80219
(~oftOuly)_
Halogenated VOC’s (STEX) by EPA Method
802113 Arizona Target Compounds (Soil
Only)
EPA Method 80218; Arizona Target ConlJ!ounds
(~oi~O~y)_
Full List VOC’s
by
EPA Method 802IB_jSoilOnjy)
S/Sample
S/Sample
S/Sample
S/Sample
$94
$135
$160
$209
163
164
165
166
Aromatic VOC’s (BTEX) by EPA Method 802IB (Groundwater Only)
Halogenated VOC’s (BTEX) by EPA Method
802113 Arizona Target Compounds
(Groundwater Only)
EPA
Method 80218; ArIzona Target Compounds (Groundwater Only)
Full
List VOC’s by EPA Method 8021B (Groundwater Only)
Aromatic VOCs (BTEXI by EPA Method
8021B (Air Only)
I
I
167
S/Sample
$143
168
Halogenated
VOCs by EPA Method 8021B Arizona Target Compounds (Air Only)
S/Sample
$177
Li~
~
(Soil Only)
-
I
S/Samp!e
L
5223
I
I
170
I
Full
List VOCs
by EPA Method 826013 (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$239
171
EPA
Method 82608; ArIzona Target Compounds (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$225
172
Full
List VOCs by EPA Method
82608 (Groundwater Only)
POLYNUCLEAR AROMOATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHs)
S/Sample
$240
173
Semi-Volatile Organics by EPA Method 8270C
-
base neutral (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$234
174
Semi-Volatile Organics by EPA Method 8270C
-
base neutral (Groundwater Only)
5/Sample
$253
175
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8310 (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$176
176
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH5) by EPA Method 8310 (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$174
WASTE CHARACTERIZATION ANALYSIS
1
S/Sample
S/Sample
598
S/Sample
$141
S/Sample
$165
$202
Page 6~f
B
177
TPU
by EPA Method 418.1
(Groundwater Only)
-
FOR WASTE
CHARACTERIZATIONAND PERMIT REQUIREMENT
PURPOSES
ONLY
S/Sample
$75
TCLP Extraction Lead (Pb)
Analysis
by
EPA Method Jill
and the appropriate
SW846
EPA Method
S/Sample
$113
179
TCLP Extraction
by EPA Method
1311
-
Analysis of
8 RCRA
Metals by appropriate
SW846 EPA
Method
S/Sample
$251
180
Ignitability Test by
EPA Method 1010 (Liquid Only)
S/Sample
$46
181
IgnitabililyTest by
EPA Method
1010 Modified (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$47
182
Corrositivity pH by EPA Method 9045 (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$20
183
Corrositivity
p11 by EPA Method 9040(6W Only)
S/Sample
$19
184
Paint FilterFree Liquids by EPA Method 9095
S/Sample
$21
185
PCB’s
by EPA Method 8082 (Soil Only~
S/Sample
$121
186
Lead (Pb)by
an approved SW846 EPA Method (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$35
BIOFEASIBILITY / BIOTREATABILITY ANALYSIS
187
Phosphate-P by an approved EPAJASTM Method (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$38
188
Nitrate# nitrite-N
by an approved EPAJASTM Method (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$42
189
Nitrogen (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$44
190
Alkalinity
by EPA Method 310.1 (Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$21
191
Total Organic Carbon by EPA Method
415.1
S/Sample
$51
192
Total Organic Carbon by
EPA Method 9060
S/Sample
$64
193
Ammonia by EPA Method
350.3
or ether ASTM
Method
(Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$30
194
Sulfate by EPA Method 375.2 or other ASTM Method
(Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$26
195
Nitrate by EPA Method 353.2
(Groundwater Only)
S/Sample
$26
196
Alkalinity by EPA Method 310.1
Modified (Soil Only)
S/Sample
$22
197
Total Dissolved Solids
by EPA Method
160.1
S/Sample
$20
19$
Total Dissolved Solids
by EPA Method
160.3
S/Sample
$19
199
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (SOD) by EPA Method 405.1
(Aqueous
Matrices Only)
S/Sample
$48
RELEASE REPORTING/CORRECTIVE ACTION FORMS
200
Release Reporting Form
T & M
201
Conformed Release 14-day Report
‘T & M
202
Initial
Site
Characterization Report
•T & M
103
LUST Site Classification Form
T & M
204
Free Product Report
T & M
205
LUST Site Characterization Report
T & M
206
Notice ofSoil Remediation Form
‘T & M
207
Corrective Action Plan
T & M
20$
Periodic Site Status
Report (Soil
Only)
‘T & M
209
Periodic Site Status Report (Soil and Groundwater)
T & M
210
Corrective Action Completion Report
T & M
NOTESZ
I
Source
-
Bureau ofLabor ofStatistics Produccr Price mdix for Finished
Goods Less Foodand
Energy Not
Scasona!bPAdjusted.
Unadjusted percent
change loT Fiscal flat
2002 (July 2001
thTOUgII
June 2002).
Page
7 of 8
ATTACHMENT
4
TITLE 328 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FINANCIAL ASSURANCE BOARD
ARTICLE
1.
PAYMENT
OF CORRECTIVE
ACTION AND THIRD PARTY
LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM
THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Rule
1.
Definitions and References
328 IAC
1-1-1
Application
of definitions
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-i 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-1 1-2;
IC
13-23
Sec. I. The definitions in IC
13-I l-2apply to this article.
Inaddition to
the definitions in IC
13-I 1-2, the definitions in this
rule
apply
throughout this article.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 IAC 1-l-1;fliedDec 4,
1992,
/ 1:00
am.:
16
JR 1051; readoptedfiledJan
JO,
2001,
3:2) p.m.: 24 JR 1534;filed Oct 17,
2001,
4:30p.m.: 25 JR
787)
328 IAC 1-1-2
“Administrator”
defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I; IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5; IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 2. “Administrator”
refers tothe administrator of
the
fund.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328
1AC /-1-2;fiied Dec 4,
/992,
11:00a.m.: /61/051;
readoptedfiledian
/O,2001,3:2/p.m.: 241R1534;filed Oct /7, 2001, 4:30
p.m.: 251R
787)
328 LAC
1-1-3
“Corrective action” defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-1 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
3. “Corrective action”
means
action taken to minimize, contain,
eliminate, remediate, mitigate, or clean
up
a release,
including emergency measures taken as
part
of an initial
response to the release under rules of the solid waste management board
at
329 JAC 9-5-2.
(Underground Storage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 MC l-/-3;flied
Dec 4,
1992,
/1:00am.:
/6 IR
/05/; re adoptedflied Jan 10,
2001, 3:2/ p.m.:
24 JR 1534;filed Oct 1 7~200/, 4:30 p.m.:
25 JR
787)
328 MC
1-1-3.1
“Corrective action plan” or“CAP”
defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-7;
IC
13-23-8-3
Sec.
3.1.
“Corrective
action plan”
or
“CAP”
means
the corrective
action
plan
described
by
rules
of
the
solid
waste
management board at 329 IAC 9-5-7(a)
and
329 IAC 9-5-7(b).
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328/AC
1-1-3./;Jl/ed Oct
17,
2001,
4:30p.m.:251R 788)
328 IAC
1-1-4
“Deductible
amount” defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-7; IC
13-23-8-3
Sec. 4. “Deductible amount” means the amount set forth in IC
13-23-8-3 applicable to each incident number assigned
by the
department. A person applying to the Iliad under 328 IAC
1-3-1
must provide evidence of payment ofthe deductible amount under
IC I 3-23-8-4(a)(3).
(Underground
Storage
Tank FinancialAssurance Board;
328 MC 1-l-4;flled Dec 4,
/992,
11:00a.m.: 16 JR
1051;fiiedJan 9,
/997. 4:00p.m.: 201R 1/03; readoptedji/edfan
10,
2001,
3:21p.m.: 241R 1534;flied Oct 17,
200), 4:30p.m.:
25 JR
788)
328 IAC
1-1-5
“Department” defined (Repealed)
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
1
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM
THE EXCESS
LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Sec.
5. (Repealed by
UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board;filed Oct / 7. 2001,
4:30p.m.: 25 (P803)
328
AC
i-i-LI
“Emergency measures” defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I; IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
5.1. “Emergency measures” means
any
action that is taken at
or
near
a
petroleum release to abate an
immediate threat
of
harm to human health, property, orthe environment. The actions taken must be approved by the department prior to payment from
the
fund.
(Underground Storage Tank Financial Assurance Board;
328 L4C /-/-5. /; filed Oct / 7, 200/,
4:30p.m.:
25 JR
788)
328
AC
1-1-6
“Fund” defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I; IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-i 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-7-I;
IC
13-23-8
Sec.
6.
“Fund”
means
the underground petroleum
storage
tank
excess
liability
trust
fund
established
at
IC
13-23-7-1.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board;
328 (AC
1-1-6; filed Dcc 4, /992,
11:00 a. m.:
16
JR
105);filed Jan ~
/997,
4:00p.m.: 201R 1/03; readoptedfiled Jan 10,
2001,
3:21p.m.: 24/P
)534;filed Oct 17,
2001, 4:30p.m.: 25
JR
788)
328 MC 1-1-7
“Occurrence”
defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-S-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
7. “Occurrence” means
an
incident that results
in a release of petroleum, including a continuous or repeated release of
petroleum,
from an
underground storage tank
system.
(tindergroundStorage TankFinancialAssurance Board; 328 MCI-I- 7;flled
Dec 4.
1992,
11:00 a.m.:
/6 JR
1051; readoptedfiledJan /0,
200!, 3:21p.m.: 24 JR
1534;flIed Oct 17,
200!, 4:30p.m.:
25/P
788)
328 AC
1-1-8
“Reasonable costs” defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I; IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 8. “Reasonable costs”means
a monetaryamount or range, as determined by the department, which is commensurate with
a corrective action when the corrective action was taken. Reasonable
costs shall
be determined by the department by a review of
the following:
(I)
The activities outlined in
the approved
or deemed approvedcorrective action plan
and those
activities in fact performed.
(2)
The approved site characterization
and those activities
in fact
performed.
(3)
The
emergency measures
and
those activities in fact performed.
(4)
The scope, complexity,
and
timing of the corrective action activities.
(5)
The fair
market value of the costs
for services or goods
within the
particular
market or
industry
where
the
work
is
performed
as
provided,
in part, in
328
IAC
1-3-5(c).
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board;
328 JAC 1- I-8;fi/ed Dec 4, /992,
1/:00 a. m.: /6 JR 105/;flied Nov I,
1995, 8:30am.:
19 JR 342; readoptedfiledJan
/0,
200/,
3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;fl/ed Oct 17,
2001,
4:30p.m.: 25 JR
788)
328
IAC
1-1-8.5
“Site characterization” defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5; IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 8.5. “Site characterization”means theinitial site characterization described in rules ofthe solid waste management board
at
329IAC 9-5-5.1 and investigations described in 329 IAC 9-5-6
and
may
include, as necessary,
quarterly monitoring
and
pilot
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 2
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY
LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
studies
to determine the feasibility of remediation alternatives.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 /AC
1-I-8.5;flied Oct
17,
200/,
4:30p.m.: 25/R
788)
328
SAC
5-1-9
“Substantial compliance” defined
Authority:
IC
53-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-8-4
Sec. 9. “Substantial compliance” means that, at thetime a release
was
discovered, the owner or operator had taken affirmative
steps to
comply with the requirements
of IC
13-23-8-4.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 IAC 1-1-9;
filed Dec 4,
199Z
11:00a.m.: /6 IR
1052;flled Nov 1,
1995, 8:30am.:
19 JR
343; readoptedfiled Jan 10,
200/,
3:21p.m.: 24
JR 1534;filed Oct
1
Z
200). 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 789)
328
MCi-I-ID
“Third
party liability”
defined
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1; IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
tO. “Third
party
liability”
is
the damage a tank owner or operator
is
legally
obligated to
pay
for injury,
expense, and
damage suffered by
a third party
as the result of a release. Third party liability includes
bodily
injury and property damage. Third
party
liability does not include punitive or exemplary damages.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board;
328 (AC
1-i-JO; filed Dec 4,
1992,
11:00a.m.: /61R 1052; readoptedfiled Jan
10,
2001,
3:21p.m.:
24 IR 1534;ftled Oct /7,
2001,
4:30
p.m.:
25 JR
78 9)
328
AC
i-i-Il
Incorporation
by reference (Repealed)
Sec. 11.
(Repealed by UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board;flied Oct /7,
200/,
4:30p.m.: 25 JR 803)
Rule 2.
Scope and Fund Management
328
SAC 1-2-1
Applicability
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. I. This article implements provisions of IC
13-23 for the administration ofthe fund. Thisarticle establishes procedures
by which persons listed in 328 IAC 1-3-I mayapplyto the fund forpayment ofcorrective action costs
and
third
party
liabilityclaims
arising
from petroleum releases.
Payment ofcorrective action costs and third
party
liability claims shall be made in accordance with
the following:
(1) 328 IAC 1-3-4(b) applies to any one (1) site,
upon which:
(A)
an occurrence
has
not been
reported to the department;
or
(B) the corrective action
has
not been completed as of the effective date of this rule.
(2)
The
cost
range or amount of the expenditure to
be
reimbursed
by
the fund,
as
set
forth
in 328
IAC
1-3-5,
shall
be
determined
as of the date the expense was initially incurred by the applicant to the fund.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance
Board;
328
(AC 1-2-1 ;flkd Dec 4,
1992,
11:00a.m.: 161R /052;readoptedfiled
Jan /0,
200!, 3:21p.m.: 241R 1534;filed Oct
17,
2001, 4:30p.m.:
25!R
789)
328
SAC 1-2-2
Fund management
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
(C
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 2.
The administrator of the fund shall prepare an annual report to thefinancial assurance board by September
1 of each
IndianaAdministrative Code
Page
3
PAYMENT
OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONAND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
year. The report shall include the following:
(I) A financial statement detailing information for the management and oversight ofthe fund,
including facts concerning the
amount of money currently in the fund,
the amount of money obligated for corrective actions and third party
liability claims,
and
estimatesof future revenue for
and
demands on the fund.
(2) An
overview of the fund claims process.
(3) A report
of
the number of claims
made against the fund that were approved and denied during the reporting year.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 (AC
-2-2;flled Dec 4,
1992, 11:00a.m.: / 6 JR 1052;readoptedflled
Jan
10,
2001.
3:21 p.m.:
24
JR 1534;flled Oct
17,
2001,
4:30p.m.:
25 JR
789)
328
AC
1-2-3
Obligation of monies
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5; IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
3.
(a) Claims shall
be paid in the order received by the department
unless the procedure
set forth
in 328 IAC
5-4-I
is
applicable.
(b) At the beginning of each
state fiscal year, the administratorshall
obligate sufficient
monies
for administering the fund.
This amount shall be approved by thefinancial assurance board.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328/AC
i-2-3;filed Dec 4,
/992,
11:00a.m.: /6 JR /052;flied
May
25,
1999,
4:31 p.m.:
22 JR 3/03; readoptedflledJan /0,
2001,
3:2/
p.m.:
24
/R
1534;flied Oct /
7, 200/,
4:30p.m.: 25 JR 789)
Rule 3.
Fund
Coverage
and Eligibility
328 AC
1-3-1
Fund access
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5; IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-7; IC
13-23-8-4
Sec.
I.
The following persons
may apply to the fund for payment of expenditures
arising from corrective
action
and
for
indemnification of third
party
liability:
(1)
Eligible tank owners
and
operators,
including transferees
as
described in IC
13-23-8-4.
(2)
Persons assigned the right of reimbursement by any person
described in subdivision (I).
(3) Subsequent owners ofthe property upon which tanks were located, ifthe tanks were closed by a previous property owner,
tank owner, or operator who is eligible.
(UndergroundStorage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 IAC )-3-I;flied Dec 4,
/992,
11:00a.m.: /6 JR 1053;fl/ed Jan 9,
1997,
4:00p.m.: 20 JR 1103; readaptedflledJan 10,
200/,
3:2) p.m.: 24 JR /534;flled Oct 17,
200/,
4:30p.m.: 25 JR
790)
328 SAC 1-3-2
Fund coverage
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1; IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-8-4; IC
13-23-9-2;
IC
13-23-9-3
Sec. 2. (a) Monies may be disbursed from the fund to persons listed in section
1 ofthis rule, for payment ofcorrective action
costs
in
compliance
with
IC
13-23-8-4(a)(4)
through
IC
13-23-8-4(c)
and
IC
13-23-9-2(a)
through
IC
3-23-9-2(c).
Site
characterization
costs
may
be disbursed
from
the fund to persons
listed
in section
I
of this rule prior to an
approved or deemed
approved CAP, ifthe work for which payment is sought
is completed in accordance with rules ofthe solid waste management board
at 329 IAC 9 or the risk integrated system of closure (RISC) standards.
(b)
Monies may
be disbursed to persons
listed
in section
I ofthis rule for payment of claims of liability to third parties
in
compliance with IC
13-23-9-3.
(UndergroundStorage
Tank FinancialAssuranceBoard; 328/AC /-3-2;flledDec 4,
/992, 11:00
am,:
i6IR
/053; readoptedflled Jan /0, 200/, 3:21p.m.: 241R /534;flledOct
/7,
200/,
4:30p.m.: 251R 790)
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 4
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND
THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE
EXCESS
LIABILITY
TRUST
FUND
328 SAC 1-3-3
Eligibility
requirements
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-I
I-i
Affected:
IC
6-8.1-10-1; IC
13-23-7;
C
13-23-8-4;
IC
13-23-12
Sec. 3.
(a) Persons listed in section
1 of this rule must do the following to be
eligible for reimbursement from the
fund:
(I)
Meet the requirements set forth in IC
I 3-23-8-4(aXl) through IC I 3-23-8-4(a)(4).
(2)
In accordance with rulesof the solid waste management board
at
329 IAC 9-4 and rules of the water pollution
control
board at
327
LAC 2-6.1, communicate a spill report to the department of environmental management.
(3)
Current tank owners or operators who have failed to pay
all
tank
fees that are due under
IC
13-23-12-1
by the date that
the fees are due shalt be eligible for reimbursement from the fund in accordance with subsection (b) upon payment ofall past
due
fees, interest, and penalties.
(4) A person who acquires ownership
in accordance with subsection (e)
shall be
eligible
for reimbursement from the fund
upon timely payment of all
past due tank fees, interest,
and penalties in accordance with subsection (h).
(b) A tank owneT or operator who fails to
pay
all tank fees that
are
due under
IC
13-23.12-I
by the date that the fees are
due
shall
be eligible
for reimbursement from the fund
according to the following formula:
(1)
Determine the number ofpayments that were owed under IC 13-23-12-I
on all
regulated
tanks
at the facility from which
a release occurred, beginning with the date that the fees breach tank first became due under IC 13-23-12
and continuing until
the date on
which the release occurred.
(2) Determine the number of payments actually made under IC
13-23-12-I
on all
regulated tanks
at
the facility from
which
a release occurred, beginning with the date each tank became regulated under IC
13-23 and continuing until the date on which
the
release occurred.
Divide the
number of payments
actually
made
by
the
number of payments
due
as
determined
in
subdivision
(1).
(3) Determine the amount of money the person would have received from the fund if all payments due on
the date the release
occurred had been paid when due,
and multiplythe amount by:
(A) the percentage
determined in subdivision (2), if the percentage
is
fifty
percent (50)
or more; or
(B) zero (0), if the percentage
determined
in subdivision (2)
is less than
fifty
percent (50).
(c) Payments that were made or could have been paid four (4) times
per
year under IC
13-23-12-3 count as one (I) payment
for purposes ofthis section.
Each payment made or due on each tank at a facility shall count as an additional payment for purposes
of this section in figuringthe total payments made or due.
(d) Persons listed in section I ofthisrulewho have had a claimdenied for failureto registeran underground petroleum storage
tank from which
a release
has occurred or for failure to pay all
registration fees that are due under IC
13-23-12-I
by the date the
fees are due may resubmit the claim, regardless of whether the denial
was
appealed, under subsection (a).
The resubniission must
be
in the form of a letter providing the facility identification
number, the incident number, and, if an appeal
was
filed, a copy of a
document demonstrating the resolution ofthe appeal, The department
has
the option to settle any pending appeals
and
resubmitted
claims.
(e) A person
who
acquires ownership or operation of an underground petroleum storage tank under IC
13-23-8-4.5(2) may
become eligible for reimbursement from the fund
by complying with subsection (f).
(f) A
person described under subsection (e) may become eligible for reimbursement from thefund for
any releases
reported
after the date that the department receives the “Intent to Acquire 1/ST and Reinstate Eligibility”
form by doing the following:
(1)
Submitting a fund “Intent to Acquire UST and Reinstate Eligibility” form (Form) as prescribed by the commissioner at
least sixty (60) days prior to acquiring ownership or operation of an underground petroleum storage tank. This form will be
kept confidential up
to the earlierof the following:
(A) The
date of the transfer of the property.
(B) The department’s receipt of the monies provided in subsection (g).
(C) For up to ninety (90) days after the projected date of closure
listed in the Form.
The department will provide a listing of environmental penalties, interest due to the fund, and
lees due, to the prospective
purchaser and the property owner within forty-five (45) days ofreceipt of the Form.
(2) Paying all applicable tank fees, including past due fees, interest,
and
penalties for each tanknot more than
thirty
(30) days
after the transaction whereby the person acquires ownership or operation of each tank.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
5
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
(3) The seller ofthe underground petroleum storage tank site is
liable for any
and all
unpaid tank fees, interest, and penalties
that
are
assessed
by
the department in accordance with subsection (g).
The
purchaser is
to collect
all
past
due
tank
fees,
interest, and
penalties
from
the noncompliant seller ahd remit to the department the full amount of the assessment
for the
subject underground petroleum
storage tank provided by
the
department in accordance
with subsection (g)
prior
to
an
occurrence. The timely remittance of these monies is
a condition of
fund eligibility for the purchaser.
(g)
Persons listed in section
I of this
rule and described in subsection (e) who fail to pay tank fees
when due are subject to
payment of interest and penalties on those fees in order to become eligible for the fund under subsection(f)
Interest and penalties
due will include the following:
(1) Penalties
and interest due the department of revenue.
(2) All
past due underground storage tank fees
under
IC
13-23-12.
(3) An
environmental
penalty as
specified in subsection (h)(2).
This penalty will
be
distributed into the fund
and
into
the
Petroleum Trust Fund in accordance with IC
13-23-12-7(b).
(4)
Interest will be charged for the missed fee(s) at the percent per year
based on subsection (Ii)
and
IC 6-8.1-10-1
until
all
fees due have
been paid in full for each
tank.
This interest will be deposited
into the fund.
Payment of all fees,
interest, and penalties due within thirty (30) days of the date of transferofthe subject property is a requirement
for fund eligibility for the purchaser.
(h) In addition to all past due fees owed, the amount of interest and penalties owed by a particular owner or operator is to be
determined by the following formula:
(I)
Interest as follows:
Numberof Delinquent Days
x
Daily Interest Rate
Interest Due
Interest will
be calculated according to IC
6-8.1-10-I.
(2) Penalty as follows:
(A)
For sites that were
never
registered,
or sites for
which
no
tank fees
were paid
when due,
the penalty will
be
calculated at
two
thousand dollars ($2,000)
under IC
13-23-12-7(a)
per petroleum underground
storage tank.
(B)
For
all
other sites,
the penalty
will
be calculated
at one
thousand dollars
($1,000)
per petroleum
underground
storage tank for each year that passes after the fee becomes due and before the fee
is paid.
(Underground Storage Tank FinancialAssurance Board;
328 JAC 1-3-3;filed Dec
4,
1992, 11:00am.:
16
FR 1053;filedian
9,
1997, 4:00p.m.:
20 JR 1104;
errata,
20 JR 1593; readoptedfiledian
10,
2001,
3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;filed Oct17, 200/,
4.30
p.m.:
25 JR 790; errata filed Feb 27,
2002, 9:58a.m.: 25 JR 2254)
328
IAC
1-3-4
Amount
of coverage
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC 13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 4, (a) After payment ofthe applicable deductible amount, the fund may pay
for costs incurred by persons listed in section
I of this nile, for corrective action
and third party liability
as specified in IC
13-23-8-I.
(b) Regardless of the number ofeligible persons listed in section 1 ofthis rule at one(I) site, no more
than two million dollars
($2,000,000)
may
be
reimbursed
for the
costs,
including
third
party
liability
claims, associated
with
a
single
occurrence.
(UndergroundStorage TankFinancialAssurance Board; 328JAC 1-3-4;fi/ed Dec 4.
1992, 11:00a.m.: I6JR 1054; readoptedfiled
Jan
JO,
200/,
3:21 p.m.: 24 JR 1534;filed Oct / 7,
200/,
4:30p.m.: 25 JR
792)
328 MC 1-3-5
Reimbursable expenditures
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1; IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-1 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-3-2
Sec.
5. (a) Persons listed in section
I of this
rule may seek payment from the fund for the following costs related to necessaxy
costs actually incurred
in
the performance ofcorrective action:
(I) Investigation, which
includes research, field time, report writing, and clerical support.
(2)
Lodging
and per diem
costs will be
paid
in accordance with the most current
Indiana
department
of administration
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 6
PAYMENT
OF
CORRECTIVE
ACTION AND THIRD
PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM
THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
financial management circular covering state tTavel policies
and
procedures. Mileage
shall be calculated
at the federal rate
for
a privately
owned automobile under 41
CFR 301-10.303, ineffect
on
September 6,2000.
Sales of the Codeof Federal
Regulations are handled
by the Superintendent of Documents, Government PrintingOffice, Washington, D.C. 20402.
(3)
Persons listed in section
1
ofthis rule may employ
a certified contractor undeT
IC
13-23-3-2
or
may
use the owner’s or
operator’s personnel to perform all or
part
of a corrective action.
(4) Soil and water sampling for petroleum and petroleum constituents shall be performed in accordance with rules of the solid
waste management
board at 329 IAC 9 or the risk integrated system of closure (RISC) standards.
(5) Expenditures for machinery and equipment must be
prorated based on the normal expected life ofthe item and the length
of time the item
was
used for
a
single corrective
action. In
no
event will
the
fund
pay
for
purchases of machinery
and
equipment in excess of the market cost of leasing the item for a corrective action. Examples of equipment charges which can
be
made to the fund are disposable bailers and sample bottles.
(6) Persons listed in section
1 of this rule may be reimbursed for expenditures for materials
and supplies, such
as disposable
protective equipment, building materials (piping, cement), and preservatives.
(7)
Attorney fees, not to exceed
twenty-five
percent (25)
ofthe total claim or thirty thousand dollars ($30,000),
whichever
is
less,
shall
only
be payable if incurred
by the owner or operator in defense of a third
party
liability claim.
(8) Governmental administrative fees for local, state, or federal permits
necessary for corrective action.
(9)
Provision of alternate water supply. This cost
must have been previously approved
by the department.
(10) Any other reasonable costs the department finds to be necessary for corrective action or payment ofa third
party
liability
claim.
(11) Costs associated with transitioning a site to RISC will be paidif these costs would be less than the costs to complete the
remediation
under rules of the solid
waste management board at
329 IAC
9.
(12) Markup of no more than fifteen percent (15)
will
be reimbursed
on all
eligible costs
except for the following:
(A)
Travel
costs, including mileage, per diem, and lodging.
(B)
Personnel costs.
(C) Utilities for temporary facilities.
(D) Governmental administrative
fees for local,
state, or federal permits.
(E) Equipment and supplies not purchased or rented specifically for use at a facilityorthat are not
part ofthe approved
remedial
technology.
(b)
The following expenditures
are ineligible for
reimbursement from the
fund:
(I)
Costs incurred before April I,
1988.
(2)
Costs ofrepair, upgrading,
or replacement of an underground petroleum
storage
tank or its associated equipment.
(3)
Costs of environmental investigation and
remediation
not directly related to a release from
a quali1~’ingunderground
storage tank. Ineligible costs include the cost oftestingfor nonpetroleum contamination
and the cost of vapor orground water
monitoring devices that are not associated with corrective action.
(4)
The cost of equipment purchases other
than
those expenditures routinely required to implement a corrective action plan.
Examples of equipment
purchases that cannot
be
charged to
a specific site include drilling
rigs,
earth moving equipment,
photoionization detectors, explosimeters,
and hand tools.
(5)
The cost ofcosmetic improvements, includingthe repairorreplacenientof blacktop or concrete, unless directly associated
with corrective action.
(6) Lost income or reduced
property values, unless
part of a third party
liability
claim.
(7) Interest or
finance
charges.
(8) Contractor costs notdirectly related to corrective action activities, such as
preparing cost
estimates.
(9) Fines or penalties imposed by local, state, orfederal governmental
agencies.
(10) Punitive or exemplary damages.
(II)
Any
costs
for remediation of contamination
not shown to be above the
concentrations listed in the Indiana Department
of
Environmental
Management Underground Storage Tank
Guidance Manual (1994), rules of
the
solid waste management
board at
329 IAC
9, and
the RISC standards.
(12) Any
costs related to the excavation and disposal of more than one thousand five hundred (1,500) tons of soil, unless:
(A) alternative
remediation techniques have been considered;
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
7
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST
FUND
(B)
excavation and disposal
was shown to be the most cost
effective remediation
option; and
(C) thesoil removal
is part of
a CAP approved or deemed
approved by the commissioner.
(13)
Any
other cost
not
directly related
to
corrective
action
or third
party
liability or otherwise determined
not
to
be
reimbursable under this rule as a result of a financial ortechnical review.
(c)
Appropriate
expenditures
which
may
be
considered
for reimbursement
are
set
forth
in the
following
reimbursable
expenditure
chart.
Sampling
and
analysis must
be
conducted
in
accordance with “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods”, United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency PublicationSW-846, Third Edition (November
1986)
as amended by Updates! (July1992), II (September
1994), hA (August
1993), IIB (January
199$), Ill (December1996),
and
lilA
(May
1999).
Publication
SW
846
is available from the Superintendent of Documents,
Government Printing Office, Washington,
D.C.
20402.
Activity
Cost Range or Maximum Amount
SITE INVESTIGATION
Mobilization
and demobilization within
a
50
mile
radius.
This
includes the cost of moving general contractor owned equipment,
set-up,
and removing equipment.
$300
Soil borings
Number of feet in incremental amounts
Less
than
16 feet
$20 per foot
16
through less than 26
feet
$25 per foot
26
feet or more
$30 per foot
Decontamination and equipment cleaning
$10
per each
5 feet of boring
Cutting holes in concrete or asphalt (12 inches in diameter)
$90 per hole
Materials
Well
casing and
screen (including riser) filter pack, annular and
surface seal:
2
inch
well
$~0
per foot
4
inch well
$12 per foot
6 inch
well
$15
per foot
Flush-grade well
covers
$75
per cover
Laboratory services, including containers, packaging,
and postage.
Soil analysis methods
TPH—8015
$75 per sample
TPH—418.1
$100 per sample
VOC—8260
$200 per sample
SVOC—8270
$325 per sample
PAH—8310
$185
per
sample
PCB—8080
$1 IC
per
sample
Metals—(13)
$170 per sample
BTEXJMTBE—8021
$75 per sample
BTEXJMTBE—8260
$200 per sample
Water analysis methods
TPJ-l--8015
$75 per sample
VOC—8260
$200 per sample
BTEXIMTBE—8021
$75 per sample
BTEXIMTBE—8260
$200 per sample
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 8
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS
FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
SVOC—8270
$325
per sample
PAH—8310
$185 per sample
Metals—(I3)
$170 per sample
Monitored natural attenuation parameters
Nitrates
$15
per sample
Nitrites
$15 per sample
Sulfate
$15
per sample
Dissolved methane
$50
per
sample
Use of RISC will
require
DQO—Level IV,
including
raw
data,
internal chain of custody, and QA/QC.
20
markup allowed per
sample
When submitting a claim forreimbursement, the claimant shall be
requiredto give the
personnel
classification, task beingperfornied,
and the name of the individual performing the
task.
Rates will be
paid
based on the task performed by
an employee rather than the
qualifications of the employee,
Refer to
subsection (d)
for
task
descriptions for personnel classifications.
Principal
$110 per hour
Senior project
manager
$102 per hour
Project manager
$83
per hour
Staff project person
$70 per hour
Senior technician
$55 per hour
Technician
$38 per hour
Drafting person
$35
per hour
Word processor/clerical
$28
per hour
Toxicologist
$125
per hour
INITIAL ABATEMENT AND FREE PRODUCT REMOVAL
Except
where provided in this
rule, approval of costs will be on
a
case-by-case basis.
SITE SET-UP PREPARATION
Trailer rental
$300 per month ($10
per day)
Portable toilet
$150 per month ($5
per day)
Utility
check,
the
date
and
time of
the
utility
check
must
be
documented.
$400
Utilities for temporary facilities
Temporary power
$500 per month ($16.67
per day)
Temporary water
$150 per month
($5 per day)
Temporary phone
$200 per month ($6.67 per day)
DEMOLITION
Concrete and asphalt removal
Saw
concrete, prices
are per linear foot
4
inch concrete
6
inch concrete
Under 200 feet
$1.60 per foot
$2 per
foot
200 through 400
feet
$1.40 per foot
$1.81
per foot
400 through
600 feet
$1.33 per foot
$1.70 per foot
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 9
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE
EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
600 through 1,000 feet
$1.20
per foot
$1.66 per foot
Over
1,000 feet
$1.08
per foot
$1.60 per
foot
Saw asphalt, prices are per
linear foot
3 inch
asphalt
4 inch
asphalt
6 inch asphalt
Under 450 feet
$1.75
per foot
$1.90 per foot
$3
per
foot
450 through 600
feet
$1.50
per foot
$1.75
per foot
$2.75
per foot
600 through 1,000 feet
$1.35 per foot
$1.50
per
foot
$2.25 per foot
Over
1,000
feet
$1.25
per foot
$1.35
per foot
$2
per foot
Concrete removal,
including
the cost of loading
and hauling to a
legal
landfill within
6 miles, but
does not include landfill fees
4 inch concrete
$3
per ton
6
inch concrete
$5.77
per ton
7 inch through 9
inch concrete
$17.47 per ton
10
inch and over
$43.96 per ton
With rebar
Add
15
For less
than 500
square feet
Add
35
Concrete curb
$5.04
per linear foot
Asphalt removal,
including the
cost of loading and hauling to a
legal
landfill within 6 miles,
but does not include landfill
fees
Removal asphalt pad
(3
inches)
$0.25
per square foot
Removal
asphalt curb
$1.41
per linear foot
For
hess than 500
square feet
Add 35
EXCAVATION
Equipment costs
and
labor
$2.22 per ton
Mobilization
$300
Supplies, for example, visqueen.
Stockpiling soil on-site
$1.34 per ton
Tank
removal,
decommissioning,
cutting,
and
disposal
are
not
eligible for reimbursement unless necessary as
part
of corrective
action.
Costs for pumping, testing,
and disposal of
tank
contents
are
not
eligible
for reimbursement
Under
1,000
gallons
$1,000
per tank
1,000 through 4,999 gallons
$1,500 per tank
5,000 through 10,000 gallons
$2,000
per tank
Above
10,000 gallons
$2,500 per
tank
TRANSPORTATION
Loading
$1.34 per ton
Hauling, mileage must be documented
$0.37
per ton for each mile
DISPOSAL
OF SOIL, GROUND WATER, AND TRASH
Landfill fees
Sampling required
by landfill. Must include receipts
and
analytical results
from
local municipality.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
10
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS
FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Sanitary sewer, if approved for disposal of treated ground
water.
Must include receipts.
Contaminated
or
disposable
equipment
and
decontamination fluids.
Landfill
reimbursement
will
be
based
on
the
least
expensive
combination ofdocumented transportation
costs and documented
disposal
costs at
a permitted landfill.
Trash
$15 perton
APPROVED TECHNOLOGIES
Reimbursement for corrective action costs will be reimbursed on
the
basis of the lowest of three (3) competitive bids on the work
specified in
the corrective action plan that is approved or deemed
approved by the department. Ifthe claimant can provide sufficient
technical
justification
for
the
selection
of
another
bid,
the
corrective
action
costs
associated
with
the
higher
bid will
be
reimbursed.
Lease
or rental
on
equipment will not
be
reimbursed
above the
purchase price.
SITE RESTORATION
Backfill hauling
$0.37 per ton for each mile
Backfill material
$13
per ton/stone
$6.50 per tonlsoil
Backfill placement, compaction, and density verification
$4 per ton
Resurfacing
4
inch concrete
$3.25 per square foot
For each additional inch ofconcrete
Add $0.40
per square foot
Forrebar
Add 15
Asphalt pad,
4 inch
thickness
$2.15 per
square foot
Asphalt curb and
gutter
$4.75
per linear foot
Island forms
4
feet by
10
feet with 2 foot bumpers
$725
each
4 feet by
16
feet with 2 foot bumpers
$1,100 each
Equipment rental
(based
on daily rate; not
an inclusive
list)
Decontamination equipment (bucket, brushes, detergent)
$10
Power auger
$50
Hand auger sampling kit (hand auger/ brass sleeves)
$35
Slide hammer core sampler
$35
Photoionization
detector
$75
Flame ionization detector
$95
LEL/02
meter
$50
pH
and conductivity
meter
$20
Dissolved
oxygen meter
$30
2” submersible pump
$115
4” submersible pump
$95
Indiana Administrative Code
Page II
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Direct push technology
$1,200 per
day
$750 per
day
Steam cleaner/pressure washer
$75
Water level indicator
$12
Oil/water interface probe
$55
Bailer rental
$15
Anemometer
$35
Carbon dioxide meter
$25
Portable generator, generator
?
5kW
$50
Portable generator, generator
5kw
$90
Portable generator,
generator
?
10kw
$100
Portable generator, generator
I 0kW
$125
(d) The following categories describe the personnel classification activity descriptions:
(I) Principal will do thefollowing:
(A)
Supervise professional staff.
(B) Serve as
technical expert
on sites.
(C) Providefinal review of project documents.
(D) Limit site visits on projects.
(E)
Handle legal matters.
(F) Coordinate with attorneys.
(2) Senior project manager (includes professional geologist,
engineer,
and hydrogeologist)
will
provide the following:
(A)
Project management/oversight.
(B)
Technical document preparation/review.
(C) Coordination with the department, client, and
contractors.
(ID) Hydrogeologic and contaminant modeling.
(E)
Supervision of investigation/remediation activities.
(F)
Site
access/permitting.
(3) Project manager will provide the following:
(A)
Remediation
work plan preparation (CAP,
ISC, FSI, pilot study).
(B)
Site work preparation and planning.
(C) Supervision of remediation activities.
(ID) Oversight of waste characterization, transportation, and disposal.
(E) RISC statistics
and equations.
(F) Coordination of subcontractor work (drillers, plumbers,
and
electricians).
(G) Coordination of heavy equipment mobilization.
(4) Staffproject person will do the following:
(A)
Implement remediation system installation, operation, and maintenance.
(B)
Conduct site mapping.
(C) Assist with waste characterization, transportation,
and
disposal.
(D) Oversee installation of soil borings
and monitoring wells.
(E) Provide on-site supervision and/or perform site characterization
and
remediation activities.
(F) Oversee well
water records searches.
(0) Define how site utilities are marked.
(I-I) Survey wells.
(I) Oversee free product
removal.
(J) Conduct quarterly sampling.
(K)
Provide drilling/sampling support.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
12
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE
EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
(5)
Senior technician will oversee the following:
(A) Activities associated with operation and maintenance of remediation system.
(B) Equipment installation.
(6) Field technician
will oversee
the following:
(A) Well purging and development.
(B) Sample collection.
(C) Drum labeling/disposal.
(D) Decontamination/site clean-up tasks.
(E) Sample preparation and delivery.
(7)
Drafting person will do the following:
(A) Provide CADD work.
(B) Generate drawings, maps
and plans, boring logs, and monitoring well
installation
logs.
(C) Revise drawings
and maps
and plans.
(8)
Word processor/clerical will provide the following:
(A)
Word processing/data input.
(B) General clerical duties,
(C) Documentation reproduction, report binding, and filing.
(ID) Proofreading/editing.
(9)
Toxicologist will provide guidance for nondefault risk-based closures utilizing nondefault toxicological
parameters.
(Underground Storage Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328/AC 1-3-5;filed Dec
4,
1992, 11:00a.m.:
16 JR 1054, filedNov
1,
1995, 830a.m.:
191R 343;fdcdJan
9,
1997, 4:00p.m.: 201R
1105; readoptedfiled Jan
10.
2001, 3:21p.m.:
24 JR 1534;fiied
Oct /7.
2001, J:30p. m.:
25 JR 792; erratafiled Feb 2 ?~2002, 9:58a.m.: 25 JR 2255)
328
LAC
1-3-6
Limitation of liability
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 6. The application for or receipt ofpayment for corrective action does not limit the legal responsibility ofpersons listed
in section
1
of this
rule for
damages
incurred
by another person
as a result of a
release.
(Underground Storage Tank Financial
Assurancelioard;
328 JAC 1-3 -6;filedDec
4,
1992, 11:00a.m.:
16Th
1055; readop~edfzIed
Jan10,
2001, 3:21p.m.: 241R 1534;
filed Oct17,
2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 IR
798)
Rule 4.
Prioritization of Claims
328 IAC
1-4-1
General procedure
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
Ic
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
1. (a) The procedure set forth in this rule shall be followed in the event the unencumbered balance of funds in the fund
falls below twenty-five million
dollars ($25,000,000) or by the discretion of the administrator.
(b)
Each quali~ing
claim shall be
assigned a priority score based on
a ranking system designed to address
the following:
(1)
Initial prioritization ofall claims shall be based on the degree of environmental threat existingat the time the occurrence
was discovered. The administrator shall assign a priority
score upon evaluation of the following technical criteria
(listed in
descending order, from highest priority to lowest priority, clause (A)
having the highest priority):
(A)
Impacts to public and
private water supply.
(B) Type of petroleum.
(C) Health standards
and explosivity hazard.
(ID) Corrective action taken.
(E) Numberof gallons released.
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
13
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE
EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
(F) Degree of access to contaminated soil.
(0)
Designated
use of surface water.
(H) Site geology
and hydrology.
(2)
For purposes
of scoring claims
resulting from
occurrences
before
December 4,
1992,
and
after March 31,
1988,
the
administrator shall give additional consideration for when thecorrective action was taken.
(3) Scoring of claims shall
be determined by application ofthe followingsite
assessment model:
Site Assessment Scoring Model for Prioritization of Claims
Criteria
Value
Site assessment information.
Public drinking water supply or well within
I mile:
Is contamination present in drinking water?
YES
IS
NO
Number of wells within I mile
I
I
2 through 3
2
4 through 6
3
6ormore
4
Public
water total
times 24 equals__
Private drinking water supply or well within
I
mile:
Is contamination
present
in drinking water?
YES
IS
NO
0
Number of wells
within I mile
I through
10
1
llthrough2s
2
26 through
100
3
greater than
100
4
Private drinking water total
times
12
equals
Type of petroleum
Mixed products or waste oil
IS
Leaded gasoline
13
Gasoline
12
Jet fuels
10
Diesel fuels
9
Heating
fuels
8
Kerosene fuels
.
7
Crude oil
5
Other
—
Type of petToleum total
times
10 equals
Health standards and explosivity hazards
Contamination phase
Vapors present at the time release discovered
30
Free product present at
thetime the release
was discovered
7
Surface contamination
present at thetime the release was discovered
5
Structures affected
Residential housing
7
Municipal,
commercial, orindustrial
5
Utility lines or trenches
Area designation
Large municipality orurban area
7
IndianaAdministrative Code
Page
14
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE
EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
Small
municipality
or suburban
area
5
Rural, agricultural, or livestock area
I
Health standards total
times 6 equals
______
Corrective action taken
Corrective action complete
S
Corrective action over 50
complete
5
Corrective action initiated
5
Corrective action approved
by the department
5
Site characterization complete
5
Release response
measures complete
5
Corrective action total
times 4
equals
______
Number of gallons released
Over
12,000
10
5,000 through
11,999
8
2,000 through 4,999
6
500 through
1,999
4
100 through 500
2
Under
100
I
Number of gallons released total
times
5
equals
_____
Degree of access to contaminated soil
Contamination access
Surface (0 to 2
feet below surface)
10
Subsurface (over 2 feet below surface)
5
Access total
times 4 equals
______
Designated
use of surface water
Surface waters within
V2
mile
Lake orriver
3
Swamp orwetlands
3
Pond orcanal
2
Stream,
creek, or active drainage ditch
Distance to surface waters
Under 500
feet
3
500
feet to¼
mile
2
Over ¼
mile
Designated use of surface water
Drinking water
4
Recreational
or full body human contact
3
Aquatic, wildlife, or partial human
contact
3
Agriculture or livestock
2
Designated use of surface water total
_______
times 4 equals
_______
Site geology
and hydrogeology
Soil type
Sand
4
Clay
Depth to water table in feet
0 through
10
4
1! through 20
3
21
through 40
2
Over 40
I
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
15
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST
FUND
Unusual geologic
factors, for example, fractured
bedrock, sand or gravel veins,
perched aquifers,
or geological outcroppings
YES
5
NO
0
Site geology
and hydrogeology total
times 3 equals
_______
(c) To assure the efficient administration ofthe fund, the administrator may reclassify
a claim at any time that
it is determined
a claim has been
incorrectly ranked.
(d)
Placement of
a
claim
on
a priority
list does not constitute
a commitment to
reimburse corrective
action or third party
liability costs.
(UndergroundSiorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board;
328 JAC
1-4-1;filed Dcc 4,
1992, 11:00am.: 16/RI 055;
flIed Nov
I,
1995,
8:30a.m.:
19 JR 347; readoptedjiled Jan10,
2001, 3:2/p.m.: 24JR
1534;filed Oct
17,
2001, 4:30p.m.:
25 JR
799)
328
IAC
1-4-2
Creation
of the initial priority
list
(Repealed)
Sec.
2.
(Repealed by Underground Storage Tank Financial Assurance Board; fl/ed Nov
1,
1995, 8:30 a. in.:
19 JR 350)
328
MC 1-4-3
Creation
of subsequent priority
lists
Authority:
IC
13-14-8
Affected:
IC
13-23-9-2;
IC
13-23-9-4
Sec. 3. (a) Except for environmental emergencies, initial claims shall be ranked according to those conditions
which existed
at thetime the corrective action was commenced. Claims determined to be of identical priority shall be ranked according to the date
that an acceptable claim was received by the fund.
(b)
Subsequent
claims
may
be
reprioritized
based
on
the environmental
threat present during the time period for which
additional reimbursement is being claimed.
(c) The administrator shall notify claimants within sixty
(60) days after the receipt of their claims whether their claims shall
be
approved for payment.
If a claim is
determined to
be unacceptable
or ineligible after
reviewing the submitted information in
accordance with IC
13-23-9-2, the administrator shall notifythe owner or operator within ten(10) days ofthe denial and inform the
claimant of the
reasons for which the claim was
rejected.
(d) Claims
determined
to be unacceptable may
be revised and
resubmitted to the fund.
The priority ranking process of the
revised claim shall
be based on the date that the fund receives the revised claim.
(e)
A claimant may request a review ofa denial of payment using the procedures set forth in IC
13-23-9-4.
(Underground
Storage TankFinancialAssurance Board; 328IAC J-4-3;filed Dec 4,
1992, 11:00a.m.: 16 JR 1055;fllcdMay25,
1999. 4:31p.m.:
22 JR 3103; readoptedf:led Jan
JO,
2001,
3:21 p.m.: 241R 1534)
Rule 5.
Corrective Action Claims
328 IAC
1-5-1
Applications for
payment
of corrective action
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
I.
(a) Claim applications for reimbursement of
corrective
action
costs
shall
be
submitted
on
forms
adopted
by
the
administrator. Claimants shall itemize all
charges as required
by the application package. Documentation of expenses as required
by
the administrator must be
submitted as
part
ofthe
application.
(b) The
application shall contain the following statement, which shall be signed and
attested by the person applying to the
fund:
“I swear
oraffirm to the best ofmy knowledge and beliefthat the costs presented herein
represent the
actual costs
incurred
in the performance of corrective action related to this site during the period oftime indicated on this application. I also swear
IndianaAdministrative Code
Page
16
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM THE
EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST
FUND
or affirm that all charges presented as part of this application were necessasy to the performance of corrective action.”.
(c)
Two
(2) copies of all
documents required by the administrator shall be submitted
by the person applying to the fund to
support the application. Original documents must be
kept by the person applying to the fund for a minimumof four (4) years after
the date the application for payment was submitted, or four (4) years
after completion of corrective action, whichever is later.
(d)
A single claim
application may not be submitted to the fund for reimbursement in an amount less than thefollowing:
(I) Initial claim may
be submitted for any
amount,
including $0/eligibility preapproval claims.
(2)
Subsequent claims, five thousand dollars ($5,000) unless theclaim is:
(A) the final
application for that incident;
(B) for a third party liability claim; or
(C) for costs
incurred over a periodof four (4) months or longer.
(3)
Persons applying
to
the fund
may resubmit
claims in
any
amount if the
costs
were disallowed
for lack of backup
documentation.
Persons applying to the fund shall identify the final application as such.
(Underground Storage
Tank Financial Assurance Board;
328 JAC
1-5-1;flled Dec
4,
1992. 11:00a.m.:
J6JR 1056;flled
Nov!,
1995,
8:30 am.:
19 JR 349; readoptedflled Jan
10,
2001,
3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;flled Oct
/7,
200/,
4:30p.m.:
25
JR 80/)
328 IAC i-S-i
Fund payment procedures for corrective action
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I; IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-9-2
Sec. 2. (a) Contingentonthe availabilityofmonies asdetermined by 328 IAC 1-2-3, theadministrator shall authorize payment
upon determining that the requirements of
IC
13-23-9-2 have been
met.
(b)
Processing and
payment of claims are contingent upon the availability of monies.
(c) When a person applyingto the fund submits an application under section I ofthis rule, which includes expenses for which
that person has not made payment, then payment shalt be made by checkjointly to the person applying to the fund and the contractor
involved.
(d) When a person applyingto thefund submits documentation verifyingthatthat
sic.
person has paidfor costs of corrective
action, payment shall
be made by
check directly to that person.
(e) A
person who may apply to the fund under 328 IAC
1-3-1 may seek preapproval of a site’s eligibility to have corrective
action costs reimbursed from the fund.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328/AC J-5-2;flled Dec 4,
1992,
11:00a.m.: 16 JR /056;filed May 25,
1999, 4:31p.m.: 22 JR 3103; readopiedf:ledJanlO,
2001,
3:21p.m.: 24 JR 1534;fi/ed Oct
/ 7.
2001, 4:30p.m.: 25 JR 801)
328
IAC
1-5-3
Deemed approved; reimbursement of costs
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1; IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-8-4
Sec.
3.
“Deemed approved”, under IC
13-23-8-4,
means
that the department shall consider the CAP
approved
solely for
purposes of reimbursement of reasonable costs
from the fund. A CAP having been
deemed
approved shall in
no way relieve the
person applying to the fund of the obligation to comply with all
applicable rules ordepartment standards.
(UndergroundSt orage
Tank Financial Assurance Board; 328 JAC 1-5-3; filed
Oct
17,
200/,
4:30p.m.:
25 JR 802)
Rule 6.
Third
Party Liability Claims
328
IAC
1-6-1
Applications
for
payment of third party liability claims
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-1;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-8-3
Sec.
I. (a) Applications for reimbursementof third party liability claims against
owners or operators shall
be submitted on
Indiana Administrative Code
Page 17
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY CLAIMS FROM
THE EXCESS LIABILITY
TRUST FUND
approved
forms
established
by
the department.
The
claimant
must
attach
either a
certified
copy
of
a
legally
enforceable
final
judgment against the owner or operator or a reasonable settlement between the owner oroperator and the third party.
(b)
The owner or operator must submit proofof payment of the deductible amount under
IC
13-23-8-3.
(c) When submitting an application to the administratorunder subsection (a), the owner or operator must also forward a copy
ofthe requesttothe attorney
general.
(UndergroundSlorage
Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC l-6-1;filed Dec
4,
1992,
11:00 am.:
16 JR 1057; readopiedfiled Jan
10,
2001, 3:21 p.m.:
24 JR 1534; filed Oct
/7,
2001, 4:30p.m.:
25 JR 802)
328
IAC
1-6-2
Fund payment procedures for third party
liability
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I; IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5; IC
13-23-I 1-7
Affected:
IC
13-23-9-3
Sec. 2. (a) If the attorney general determines that the requirements under IC
13-23-9-3
have
been met, the attorney
general
shalt approve a request for indemnification ofa third party not later than sixty (60) days
after receiving the request:
(1) if sufficient
monies exist after other obligations have
been
met under 328
LAC
1-2-3;
(2) based
upon priority
rankingof the site under 328 IAC
1-4 ifapplicable; and
(3) if the administrator determines that the owner or operator is
in compliance with the requirements of IC
13-23
and
rules
adopted thereunder.
(b)
When
an owner or operator submits
an acceptable application for indemnification of a third party but the claim has not
already been paid by the owner or operator, then payment shall
be madejointly by
check to the eligible owner or operator and the
third party.
(c) When
an
eligible
owner or operator submits
an
acceptable application for indemnification of
a third party
along with
documentation veri~ing
that the owner or operator has paid the third party liability claim, payment
shall be
made directly to the
eligible owner or operator.
(d) Third party liability claims subject to review by the attorney general
shall include the reasonable fees orcompensation paid
to obtain:
(I) access to properties not controlled by the claimant;
(2) institutional controls, including, but not limited to, deed restrictions required by risk integrated system of closure (RISC);
or
(3) subdivisions
(1) and (2).
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328
JA C 1-6-2;filed Dec 4,
1992, 11:00am.:
16 lR 1057; readoptedfiled
Jan
10,
2001, 3:21 p.m.:
24 JR 1534;filed Oct
17,
2001, 4:30p.m.:
25
JR 802)
Rule 7.
Financial
Assurance
328
IAC
1-7-i
Financial
assurance certificate
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec.
I. (a) In accordance with 40 CFR 280.101, the department shall
issue a certificate of financial
assurance upon
request
to each eligible tankowner oroperator, as defined in 328 IAC
1-3-3, within sixty (60) days after theeffective date ofthisrule. Under
IC
13-23 and therules promulgated thereunder, this state issued certificate shall fulfill the federal financial assurance requirements.
(b) The certificate of financial assurance shall contain the following information:
(1) Facility
name and address.
(2) Facility
identification number issued by the department.
(3)
Amount of funds for corrective action and compensating third parties that is assured
by the fund.
(c) The owner oroperator shall maintain the certificate of financial
assurance in compliance with rules of the solid waste
management board at 329 IAC 9-8-21.
(UndergroundStorage
Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC 1-7-1;filedDec
4,
1992,
11:00a.m.: /6 JR 1055; readoptedfiled Jan 10,
2001,
3:21p.m.:24 JR 1534;filed Oct / 7,
2001,
4:30p.m.:
25 JR
802)
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
18
PAYMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND THIRD PARTY LIABILITY
CLAIMS FROM THE EXCESS
LIABILITY
TRUST
FUND
328
IAC
1-7-2
Termination of financial assurance by the department
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5;
IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 2. If, after consultation with the financial assurance
board, the department determines that insufficient monies exist to
provide owners or operators evidence of financial assurance, the departmentshall noti~
all fund participants by certified mail. The
fund coverage will continue for sixty (60) days
after notice of termination of coverage. Owners or operators shall
have sixty (60)
days after receipt of termination offinancial assurance to acquire financial assurance by
other means.
(Underground Slorage Tank
FinancialAssurance Board;
328 JAC
1-7-2;f;ledDec
4,
1992,
11:00 am.:
16 JR
1057; readoptedfiled Jan
JO,
2001,
3:21p.m.:
24 JR 1534;Jiled Oct17, 200), 4:30p.m.:
25 JR 803)
32$ MC
1-7-3
Revocation of certificate by the
department
Authority:
IC
13-23-8-I;
IC
13-23-8-4.5; IC
13-23-8-5;
IC
13-23-11-7
Affected:
IC
13-23
Sec. 3. lfthe department determines that the owner or operator has not maintained eligibility for participation in the fund, the
certificateof financial assurance issued by the department shall
be revoked. The owner or operator shall have fifteen (15) days after
revocation ofacertificate to reinstate eligibility.
(UndergroundStorage Tank FinancialAssurance Board; 328 JAC
1-7-3;ji/edDec
4.
/992. /
1:00a.m.:
16
JR /05 7; readoptedftledJan
10, 200/, 3:2/p.m.: 24 JR 1534;flled Oct / 7,
2001,
4:30p.m.: 25 JR 803)
*
Indiana Administrative Code
Page
19
ATTACHMENT
S
A
hAhflI
s~citiiuIo~y
l’a9e
1
01
I
‘I.
-7
-
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
M
Storage Tank
Fund
aximum Reasonable
Costs
-
Direct Push
Technology
Article 4, Part I
4-1-I. MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM REIMBURSEMENT
PER DAY
Minimum reimbursement:
$766/day, plus
mileage
@
98.50/mile
Maximum
reimbursement:
The greater of $766/day
or $9/foot, not to exceed
$1,422/day, plus mileage ~
98.50/mile
These rates
include mobilization, demobilization, rig up, rig
down, decontamination, and all
non-consultant
labor.
4-J-2.
INSTALL TEMPORARY
WELL
IN DIRECT PUSH BORING
$22.00/well (includes all
materials)
4-1-3.
INSTALL PERMANENT WELL
IN DIRECT PUSH BORING
$8.00/ft.
The $8/ft rate
includes all materials except locks and permits.
Locks
and permits should be billed separately
at cost
plus applicable markup.
Permanentwell
means:
I”
inside diameter casing, capable of accepting 3/4”
diameter bailer, pre-slotted screen, adequate
filter pack, bentonite seal, locking cap, street box with traffic-rated cover.
4-1-4.
WELL ABANDONMENT
(closure)
$44.00/well (includes materials and labor)
4-1-49.
CONSULTANT LABOR AND FIELD INSTRUMENTATION
Consultant on-site
labor
allowable
for the duration of the direct push boring time, plus two hours.Field instruments such as
PIDs
(photo-ionization
detectors) may be billed
separately.
4-1-50.
MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22/day/site. This includes such items as gloves, baggies, ice, water,
rope, pens,
etc. No receipts
are required.
(State Home
CDLE
Home
Oil & public
Safety
I
Top
I
FeedbackPage
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fundiconsultantlcost2oguidelines/drctpush.asp
10/13/2003
-
~irit~tng
Page
1 of2
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado
Petroleum
StorageTank Fund
MaximumReasonable Costs
-
Drilling
Article 4, Part 2
4-2-I. RATES PER FOOT. The following per-foot costs include all materials, equipment, and non-consultant
labor
necessary
to drill
a boring
for
either a 2” or4” diameter well. The
rates shown for rotary drilling apply to either air orfluid
rotary drilling. The
costs include decontamination, collecting split spoon samples
inliners at 5’ intervals,
andbackfilling
borings with bentonite grout. The costs do
not include miscellaneous small
items (see Miscellaneous Field Supplies).
L
Drilling for a 2” monitoring well
Drilling for a 4” monitoring well
1
Auger
o
-50’
$16.41/ft
IF
Auger
0- 50’
$19.15/ft
1
Auger
50’
$18.41/ft
II
Auger
50’
$21.33/ft
Rotary
0-50’
$21.06/ft
Rotary
0-50’
$27.35/ft
Rotary
50’
$23.52/ft
Rotary
50’
r~o.o9/ft
4-2-2.
MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION
$3.03/mile
4-2-3.
SOIL SAMPLING (split spoon)
$17.10/sample. This includes decontamination,
labor,
materials, and
equipment.
This cost
is
reimbursable
only when samples
are necessary more
frequently
than the
5’
intervals
included
in the per-foot drilling rate.
Examples of when more frequent
samples
may
be necessary,
such as when drilling the first boring andtrying to locate the contamination
zone orthe water
level, or when there
is
a high fluctuation in groundwater level. No additional consultant fees will
be
reimbursed. Unless OIS
requires or pre-approves
a soil
sampling method other than split spoon,
the Fund will not reimburse additional costs for a
more expensive soil sampling method.
4-2-4. COMPLETION OF BOREHOLE AS MONITORING
WELL
2” well:
$15.14/ft
4” well:
$21.67/ft
These rates
include all
associated labor and materials
4-2-5. WELL ABANDONMENT (closure)
2” well:
$7.47/ft
4” well:
$11.08/ft
These rates
include all
associated labor and materials.
4-2-48. MARKUP
Nomarkup
is permitted if the consultant does his own drilling, using his own equipment and labor.
4-2-49.
CONSULTANT LABOR AND FIELD INSTRUMENTATION Consultant on-site
labor allowable for the
duration ofthe drilling time, plus two hours. Field instruments such as PIDs (photo-ionization detectors) may be billed
separately.
4-2-50.
MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22/day/site. This includes such items
as gloves, baggies, ice, water, rope, pens, etc.
No
receipts are required.
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OJL/Fund/consultant/cost2Oguidelines/drilling.asp
10/13/2003
~..~nnWiL
w’u
uisposal
Page
1 of 2
-
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Storage Tank Fund
MaximumReasonable Costs
-
Excavation ~
Article
Disposal
4, Part 3
4-3-I.
RATES
FOR ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED
WITH THE EXCAVATION, TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL
OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS.
ACTIVITY
MAXIMUM RATE
Excavation and loading
$1067/cu yd
Transportation of contaminated soil
$8.75/cu yd
Disposal of contaminated soil
$13.13/cu
yd
Backfill and compaction (purchase,
transport, compact backfill material)
$7.66/cu yd
Backfill and compaction
(clean
excavated material)
$5.07/cu yd
Remove and dispose of asphalt or
concrete
$2.19/sq ft
Replace asphalt
$2.74/sq ft
Replace concrete
$4.92/sq ft
Traffic control
actual cost
Permits
actual cost
4-3-2.
MILEAGE.
II ?/mile/cubic yard for each mite over 40 miles from excavation site to disposal site, not to exceed 200 miles total one-way.
4-3-3.
LABORATORY ANALYSIS.
Laboratory analysis
is recommended for each
100 cubic yards excavated to confirm the level of contamination.
4-3-4.
MANIFESTS.
All transportation
and waste manifests are required
4-3-5.
CONVERSION FACTOR.
If
any
excavation, transportation or disposal activities are billed by the ton instead of cubic yard,
use this conversion factor:
1,4 tons
I cu yd
4-3-6.
APPLICANT-PERFORMED.
Fund Applicants
who perform their own
work are entitled to reimbursement at the maximum rates established at §4-3-I.
4-3-48.
MARKUP.
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fund/consultarit/cost2Oguidelines/excvdisp.asp
10/13/2003
uuluellnes
-
Excavation
and
Disposal
Page 2 of2
Consultants may
mark
up pass-through (subcontracted)
charges, subject
to any limitations established by these reasonable cost guidelines.
Applicants
who perform their own
work may not mark up any costs.
4-3-49. CONSULTANT LABOR AND FIELD
INSTRUMENTATION.
Consultant
on-site labor allowable for the duration
of
the excavation, plus Iwo hours. Field instmments such
as
PIDs
(photo-ionization
detectors) may
be billed separately.
4-3-50.
MISCELLANEOUS FIELD
SUPPLIES.
$22/day/site.
This includes such
items as gloves, baggies,
ice, water,
rope, pens,
etc.
No
receipts
are required.
St~’tc±i2rn~
I
I
QiJ~PtibiicSafety
I
Thp
I
F~e4k~ctPAg~
I
Lastmodified:
November
16,2001
http://oil.cdlestate.co.us/OJL/Fund/consultantlcost20guide!mnes/excvdisp.asp
10/13/2003
~-.~.‘!k4~I~L
aurflpLltlg
Page
1
of
I
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
StorageTank Fund
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Groundwater Sampling
Article 4, Part 4
4-4-1.
RATE PER WELL SAMPLED
$116.00
per well.
This
includes all labor and materials (bailer, non-disposable bailer, water-level indicator). It does not
include analyticaltesting or disposal of purge water. No additional consultant labor will
be reimbursed.
4-4-49.
CONSULTANT LABOR AND FIELD
INSTRUMENTATION
No
additional on-site
consultant labor will be reimbursed.
Field instruments may be billed separately.
4-4-50. MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22/day/site.
This includes such
items
as gloves,
baggies,
ice, water, rope, pens,
etc.
No receipts are required.
I
Szarc.BQWcI
CDLE Home
I Ollc~$MktyI
pIE
ackbgd
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fund/consultantlcost2oguidelines/gwsmplng.asp
10/13/2003
Consultant’s Labor Rate Schedule
Page
1 of2
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado
Petroleum
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Labor Rate Schedule
Storage Tank Fund
Consultant’s Labor
.
Article 4,
Part 5-1
4-5-I-I.
APPLICATION OF RATES
These
rates apply to environmental consultants. Reimbursement will
be
according
to task
performed
(see
“Responsibilities
and Duties” on chart below), notjob title of person performing it. Listing
as
an
environmental consultant
is required
for any
labor billed above the staffengineer/scientist rate.
Refer to the
Listed Environmental Consultant
portion of the Colorado
Reasonable Cost Guidelines (Article 2) for more information.
4-5-1-2.
10
LIMITATION
Total hours
in top 3
categories (Principal, Senior Engineer/Scientist,
and Project
Manager) cannot exceed
10
of consultant’s
total project labor hours.
4-5-1-3. COMPLEX
SITE
A complex site
is
one with extensive groundwater and soil contamination, difficult hydrogeology, multiple contaminants,
or
above-ground complications.
4-5-1-4. CONSULTANT LABOR RATES
Pursuant
to CR5.
12-25-105,
some of the
engineer
or the proper
level of supervision
with
state
law
on
this
issue.
following responsibilities and duties may require either
licensure as a professional
from
a professional engineer.
It is
the responsibility of the consultant to comply
Project management
Approve health
and safety
plan
Review and approve reports and field data
Review and approve work plan
Approve on-site activities
Perform periodic site inspections
POSITION
MAXIMUM HOURLY RATE
RESPONSIBILITIES and DUTIES
.
Listed
consultant
.
Unlisted
consultant
PRINCIPAL
$115
$60
~
Review
complex sites
Authorize new technology
Project-related budget approval
Corrective action plan review
Project-related contract review and
approval
SENIOR ENGINEERJSCIENTIST
(Involvement limited to projects
requiring
highly specialized
training)
$93
$60
New technology
innovations
Complex site characterizations
Aquifer characterization (complex sites)
Review
complex
technical reports
Review complex corrective action plans
PROJECT MANAGER
$88
$60
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OlLlFundlconsultantlcost2Oguidelines/laborcn2.asp
10/13/2003
Page 2 of2
Prepare proposals
Manage subcontractors
Represent client in dealings with
governmental/regulatory agencies
PROJECT
ENGINEER/SCIENTIST
$71
$60
Remediation
feasibility studies
and pilot
testing
Engineering/remedial
equipment design
Aquifer characterization
Prepare
final technical reports
Prepare corrective action plans
Data review and analysis
Prepare work plan
Site
inspection
STAFF ENG!NEERJSCIENTIST
.
$60
$60
Supervise on-site activities
Field work
preparation/planning
Oversee outside contractors
Site reconnaissance
and mapping
Permitting
On-site assessment activities
Obtain off-site
access permission
Prepare draft reports
Health and safety coordination and
monitoring
Develop site safety plan
SENIOR TECHNICIAN
$49
$49
Operate and maintain remedial equipment
Operate field and monitoring equipment
Well developing and sampling
DRAFTS
PERSON
$44
$44
Drafting
CAD work
Cartography
STAFF TECHNICIAN
$38
$38
Waste handling
Decontamination
Free product removal
Maintain field monitoring equipment
Assist senior technician
CLERICAL/COURIER
$33
$33
Project-related word processing
Project-related filing and mailing
Project-related photocopying
Travel to deliver orpick up job-related
samples, supplies, etc.
(State Home
CDLE_Home
QjiAf~ibljçSf~ty
I
Thp
I
F~e4k~ck
Pae
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/FundlconsultanVcost2Oguicleljnes/Iaborcn2.asp
10/13/2003
rceasOtlaDIe Costs - Laboratory Analysis
Page
1
of 2
k
Colorado
Department ofLabor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado
Petroleum
Storage Tank Fund
I
J
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Laboratory Analysis
Article 4, Part 6
4-6-I. LABORATORY ANALYSIS
The Fund
will reimburse actual laboratory charges not to exceed the rates shown in
the following
chart.
These rates
include
all supplies,
sample handling, and disposal fees.
4-6-2.
INVOICES
Invoices for laboratory analysis
must
be
provided,
regardless of the invoice
amount.
4-6-3. RUSH CHARGES
Rush charges up
to an additional
100
of a laboratory analysis rate that does not exceed these
Guidelines
will
be reimbursed
ifjustified economically by reducing overall remediation
costs or if incurred because of emergency health or environmental
issues.
“Rush”
means
performing the analysis
by the next laboratory working day.
4-6-4. INDIVIDUAL LAB TEST RATES
LARORATORY
TEST
METhOD
)
MAXIMUM
RATE
rBTEx
3
8020
I
$63.00
TVPH
1
8015
MOD
3
$63.00
TEPH
8015
MOD
~.®
J
TRPH
418.1
1664
$60.00
to
be determined
MTBE
(separate test)
8020
$69.00
Oil&
grease
413.1
1664
$60.00
to be determined
BTEX/TVPI-1
8020/8015 MOD
$103.00
3
BTEX/MTBE
8020
j
$77.00
3
BTEX/MTBE/TVPH
8020/80 15
MOD
$115.00
3
PCB
screen
soso
MOD
3
$113.00
1
VOA
8260
1 f
$193.00
1
Semi-VOA
8270
$382.00
IF-
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fund/consultantlcost2oguidelines/labanal2.asp
10/13/2003
-
~
~..uaLS
-
baooratory
Analysis
Page 2 of2
Total
lead
6010
$22.00
TCLP Pb
(includes extraction)
13 11/6010
$71.00
~
TCLP Pb & Cr (includes extraction)
1311/6010
$78.00
I
TCLP
VOA
8260
$193.00
Zero
headspace extraction
1311
I
$137.00
Filtration (liquid)
F
TCLP (8
RCRA
metals)
6010/7000 series
I
$3&00
$113.00
1
I
(solid)
1311
$104.00
j
IL
Filtration (liquid)
lgnitability/flashpoint
Corrosivity
Paint filter test
Reactivity
-
sulfide
Reactivity
-
cyanide
WET
test
(acute test)
4-6-48.
MARKUP
1
1
1
1010
1
9040/9045
j
9095
~w
7.3.4.2
j
L5~~r
7.3.3.2
1
1
2
species run
at
5 dilution concentrations
j
1
~
I
I
$36.00
$37.00
$10.00
$16.00
$39.00
$39.00
$821.00
1
1
The
consu
affiliated
Itant may mark
up
laboratory r
with the consultant.
ates if the laboratory analysis
is performed by a laboratoty that is not owned by nor
~IMisiaIn
Stat&Home
COLE
Home
I
OH &.Public Safety
I
Top
I
Feedback. Page
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
hnp://oiLcdle.stateco.us/OIL/Fund/consultantlcost2Oguidelines/Iabanal2.asp
10/13/2003
ragc
I
UI
I.
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division of
Oil and Public Safety
Colorado
Petroleum
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Level ofEffort
Storage
Tank Fund
-
Ar/ic/c 4,
Part 7
4-7-I.
OFFSITE ACCESS
Maximum
hours: Actual, not to exceed
8
hours per project for off-site access of up to three properties.
Any additional hours
should
be
clearly identified.
4-7-2.
WELL DEVELOPMENT
Maximum
hours:
Actual, nott~
exceed
1.5
hours per well. Any additional hours should
be clearly identified.
4-7-3.
UTILITY LOCATE
Maximum hours:
Actual, not to
exceed
8
hours
per site. Any additional hours should be clearly identified.
State.
Home
COLE Ho~ne
I
Oil.& Pt~blic.
Safety
I
lop
I
Feedback...Pag~
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fund/consultantlcost20guidelines/leveffrt.asp
10/13/2003
wzuxlIIlUm
iceasonable Costs
-
Rental v,
Purchase
Page
1
of
1
-L
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division ofOil and Public Safety
Colorado
Petroleum
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Rental vs. Purchase
Storage Tank Fund
Attic!e 4, Pan 8
4-8-I. FUND REIMBURSEMENT
The
Fund will reimburse the lowerof the cost to rent or purchase remediation
equipment. In most
instances, the burden will
be
on the Fund Applicant to prove that purchase
was more economically feasible than
leasing orrenting the equipment, or to
prove that it was notpossible to rent/lease the equipment,
such that purchase was the only option.
4-8-2. COMPARING
RENTAL AND PURCHASE COSTS
When determining whether to rent or purchase equipment, all costs should be
factored
into the decision, including operation
and maintenance costs. Ifthe prime contractor or consultant leases its own equipment to the Applicant, no operation and
maintenance costs will be reimbursed.
Rental rates
should factor in thefollowing:
o
purchase price ofthe equipment
+
markup, if applicable
o
salvage value ofthe equipment
o
expected economic life of the equipment (assumed to
be 30
months unless manufacturer states otherwise)
o
cost of capital (interest)
4-8-3.
PARTIAL
REIMBURSEMENT
If a Fund Applicant
purchases remediation equipment and uses it for only
a few months, theFund may reimburse only a
portion of the purchase price, adjusted to factor
in the economic life of the equipment and the numberof months the
equipment was
used at the remediation
site.
State 1-lenie
I
CDLE Home
I
Oil & Public.Safety
I
Top
I
Feedback.Page
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OILIFund/consultant/cost2Oguidelines/rent-buy.asp
10/13/2003
n.uusonaDlC
costs
-
Travel
Page
1 of
1
Colorado Department ofLabor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado
Petroleum
Storage Tank Fund
Maximum Reasonable Costs
-
Article 4,
Travel
Part 9
4-9-1.
AIRLINETRAVEL
Airline travel will be
reimbursed
only
to the extent it does not exceed the per-mile rate.
The maximum reimbursement for
airline travel will be $138 each way, or$276 round-trip.
4-9-2. LODGING
The
Fund will reimburse lodging at a rate that is actual and reasonable for the area. A receipt
is
required. The maximum
reimbursement will
be
$66 per room per night. Lodgingwill not be reimbursed unless the job site
is at
least 50
miles from the
office.
4-9-3.
MEALS
Nomeals will be
reimbursed without an allowable overnight stay. Three meals will be
reimbursed for each allowable
overnight
stay.
No receipt
is
required for meal reimbursement.
Meals will be
reimbursed
at Colorado the following per diem
rate: $33
per day.
4-9-4. MILEAGE
The
Fund will reimburse round-trip mileage
from office to job
site at
34.5
0/mile/vehicle/trip for standard and 4-wheel drive
vehicles.
The Fund will reimburse for a maximum of 400 miles
one way ($138), or 800 miles round trip ($276), per vehicle
trip. Mileage
reimbursement will not be allowable for more than one vehicle
per trip unless the
use of multiple vehicles
is
justified.
4-9-5.
OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL
Out-of-state travel will
be reimbursed, subject to thelimits established by these guidelines, if the company does not have a
Coloradooffice.
4-9-6.
TRAVEL
TIME
The Fund will reimburse for actual travel hours per employee, billed at the appropriate activity rate,
for round-trip travel to
and from the job site.
4-9-7. VEHICLE RENTAL
The
Fund will not reimburse vehicle or company car rental charges, other than the standard reimbursement rate for mileage.
4-9-48. MARKUP
No markup
is allowed on
any travel charge.
State
Home
I
COLE
Home
I
Oil &
Public Safç~
I
Tpp
I
Feedback Pagç
I
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
http:1/oil,cdle.state.co.us/OIL/Fundlconsultant/cost2oguidelines/travel.asp
10/13/2003
~~nniiwti
r~cuSOnaD!eCosts
-
Miscellaneous
Page
1 of
1
It
Colorado DepartmentofLabor and Employment
Division of Oil and Public Safety
Colorado Petroleum
Maximum Reasonable Costs- Miscellaneous
StorageTank Fund
Article 4, Part 11
441-1. EQUIPMENT
REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT
The
Fund will not reimburse the cost to repair or replace equipment that
is damaged,
lost,
stolen, or destroyed due to
negligence or vandalism.
4-11-2.
MATERIALS PROVIDED BY APPLICANT
Materials provided by the Applicant will be reimbursed at the Applicant’s cost. Nomarkup by Applicant orconsultant
is
permitted.
4-11-3.
PHOTOCOPYING
110/page.
Only job-related photocopying will be reimbursed. No reimbursement will be
paid for photocopying the Fund
application, any attachments to the application, orany documents or correspondence submitted pursuant to the application
process. The
actual cost for color or enlarged photocopies requested by the OlS
is reimbursable.
4-11-4.
RUSH CHARGES
The Fund will not reimburse rush charges unless they (1) are justified by an environmental orpublic
health
and safety
emergency, or(2) reduce overall remediation
costs.
4-11-5.
VEHICLE
RENTAL
The
Fund will not reimburse vehicle rental charges with respect to
a
vehicle
used to transport personnel orsmall equipment.
This includes the cost of renting a vehicle
from
a rental company,
as well as rental charges for consultant-owned vehicles.
4-11-SO. MISCELLANEOUS FIELD SUPPLIES
$22.00/day/site. This includes such
items as gloves, baggies, ice, water,
rope,
pens,
etc. No receipts
are required.
I
St~te
Home
I
I QiL&
Publics~iy
IThp
I
Feedback Pag~
Last modified:
November
16, 2001
http://oil.cdle.state.co.us/OJL/Fund/consultant/cost20guidelines/miscell.asp
10/13/2003
ATTACHMENT
6
~1
‘a
a
c-a inn4
dftus
C)
t1
13
m
—1
CD
CCD
9~~
p
—
U
—
—
0
CE
r
~p-1
___
___
m
C
CD
p
—.
C
Co
—S
CflQ)
C)
ill
p
CD
o
In
-4
Cl)
o
0
-4
Cl)
z
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SECTION
1:
ACTIVITIES
ACTIVITY 00:
TANK
REMOVAL
ACTIVITY
01:
INITIAL ABATEMENT
4
ACTIVITY
02:
PHASE-SEPARATED HYDROCARBON
(PSI-I) RECOVERY
5
ACTIVITY
03:
EXCAVATION/WASTE MANAGEMENT
8
ACTIVITY 04:
SITE ASSESSMENT
II
ACTIVITY 05:
RISK ASSESSMENT
16
ACTIVITY 06:
CORRECTIVE ACTION
PLAN (CAP) FEASIBILITY TESTING
..
l7
ACTIVITY
07:
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
21
ACTIVITY
08:
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
(CAP) PREPARATION
24
ACTIVITY
09:
REMEDIATION
SYSTEM INSTALLATION
25
ACTIVITY
10:
OPERATION, MONITORING, & PERFORMANCE
32
ACTIVITY
11:
SITE
CLOSURE
36
SECTION 2:
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A:
REIMBURSABLE
UNIT COSTS
PART
I:
PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL/LABOR RATES
39
PART 2:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS COSTS
42
PART
3:
DRILLING, WELL
INSTALLATION, AND DIRECT PUSH
TECHNOLOGY COSTS
43
PART 4:
TRAVEL COSTS
45
PART 5:
EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COSTS
46
PART 6:
EXCAVATION, BACKFILLING, AND
RESURFACING
COSTS
..
50
PART 7:
SOILS
AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT COSTS
51
PART
8:
REPORT
GENERATION COSTS
52
PART 9:
MARK-UP
54
PART
10:
CHANGE ORDERS
55
APPENDIX
B:
DEFINITIONS
AND ACRONYMS
PART
I:
DEFINITIONS
58
PART 2:
ACRONYMS
59
INTRODUCTION
The objective of this document
is
to
provide guidance
for
the evaluation of costs
incurred
in the
performance ofcorrective action activities associated with Leaking Petroleum
Storage Tank (LPST)
sites.
The
guidelines
are
not
intended to
set pricing
for specific
activities or to
remove
an element of
competition for the petroleum storage
tank
industry. Rather, the guidelines reflect the amount that
the INRCC will reimburse for activities in all butextraordinaiy cases. Only cost~that are, at or below
the published values in these guidelines will be
reimbursed
unless a
site-specific justification for costs
exceeding the guidelines
is submitted and approved.
The Reimbursable Cost Guidelines will be utilized
by
the TN~RCC
to evaluate and process
all
cost
proposals
and
reimbursement claims
for
corrective action activities associated with
LPST sites. The
evaluation will utilize the
guidelines in effect at the time the activities were performed.
The format of this document will allow individuals who are creating workplans and
costproposals
for various corrective action activities to arrive at nearly
the same total cost that the TNRCC would
approve
on a review of a workplan and cost proposal.
SECTION
1:
ACTIVITIES
The following section presents
the various corrective action activities, or phases/subphases of work,
normally conducted
at
an LPST
site.
Every effort has been made to put the reimbursable
costs for
these activities into a format that is usable by owner/operators, contractors and consultants, and the
T’NRCC to preapprove workplans
and cost proposals and to review applications for reimbursement.
The maximum reimbursable cost for the generation
of
a workplan
and cost proposal
is
$1
5:00.
This
amount
is
applicable to the first approved workplan
and cost proposal
tor a
given activity. If the
original workplan
and cost proposal
submitted to
theTNRCC
is unacceptable, the
costs associated
with that workplan and cost proposal are not reimbursable.
In
addition,
please be
aware that the submission of a new
cost proposal to gain preapproval for a
portion of an activity omitted from
a previous workplan
and cost proposal
is not reimbursable.
Each activity that follows will contain, where appropriate,
a worksheet for that specific activity. In
addition,
~ach worksheet will
contain
the reimbursable
costs
for the various
subphases of each
activity, with accon~panying
notes. These costs are condensed from the unit costs in Appendix A. For
your reference, definitions andacronyms
used in this document are contained in Appendtx B.
2
ACTIVITY 00:
TANK REMOVAL
This section is effective for tanks removed on or after
March 12,
1993.
A tank removal
is defined
as
the physical removal of an pnderground storage tank (UST)
from
the
subsurface. Tank removals normally
include the following acfivities:
removal and
replacement of
surface
material;
excavation,
disposal,
and
replacement of backfill
material
(see
Note
I);
tank
removal
and
disposal; backfilling and compaction of the excavation; and any
either activity typicall
associated with
the
tank removal process. Plea~e
note that overexcavation
is not part of the tan
removal process. This activity is covered
in Activity 03: Excavation/Waste
Management.
Eligibility for
the
reimbursement of a tank removal
is
based on two factors.
First, the
performance
of necessary corrective action
as defined by Title 30, Texas Administrative
Code (TAC), Chapter
334,
Subchapter H
§334.302 (a) (I)
and
(2)
and second by
§334.308 (b) and
(c) (14) (see Note
~J.
The
reimbursable amount will
be
based on
the volume of the tanks removed
as shown in
the table below.
Reimbursement of
tank
removals will
be
based on
the volume of the tank(s)
removed and will h~ve
a maximum reimbursement limit of $8,000.00 per LPST
site. For underground storage tanks having
a
volume of
5,000
gallons or
less,
the
reimbursable
cost
for
removal will
be
$1,000.00.
For
underground storage
tanks having
a volume of more than 5,000 gallons, the reimbursable cost for
removal will be $2,000.00.
TANK VOLUME
(GALLONS)
REIMBURSABLE
COST
(PER TANK)
TOTAL
MAXIMUM PER
LPST
SITE
5000 OR LESS
$l,000.0&
$8,000.00
GREATER THAN
5000
$2,000.00
$8,000.00
Notes:
I: lithe
backfill from
an eligible tank removal has been stored at the
site and analytical
results indicate that those soils are above levels
that the
TNRCC wili approve for return to the tanithold, theowiier/operator may
request oreapproval
for the disposal of those soils under
Activity 03; Excavatio&Waste Management lf~anted,the disposal of those soils will
fiji
outside of the $8,000.00 maximum fora site.
Contact your
~NRCCRegion mspector or the
i NRCC
Central Office Project Coordinator for assistance.
2: Onoccasion
a tank removal will occur where contamination has not
penetrated beyond the
excavation zone of
native soils ofthe
tankhoid,
but ~1ere the
backfill is contaminated above leveis that the
TNRCC will
approve
for
return to
the
tankhoid While
the
tank
removal will
not
be
eligible
for
reimbursement
as required in
30
TAC
§334.302
(afl)
apd(2) and
E334.308 (b)
and
(c)(
14), the disposal or
treatment
of
the backfill may
be reimbursable under §334.308
I
if
the TNRCC directs andpreapproves in
niiting the
disposal or treatment
of
the
backfill.
Contact your Region
inspector
or
the
entral 0111cc Project
Coorilinator for assistance.
3
ACTIVITY
01:
INITIAL ABATEMENT
Initial abatement measures are those activities performed
to reduce risk or threat to human health
safety,
and
the environment.
These activities
as
outlined
in
30
TAC
§334.77
(relating
to Initial
Abatement Measures
and
Site Check) can
inciude any or all of the following:
Monitor
and mitigate
any fire and safety
hazard posed by vapors or
free product;
Removal of product from tanks to prevent further release; and/or
Continuous free product removal (see note below).
Please note that reimbursement is
based, in part,
on
the
requirement that contamination must have
penetrated the native soils around the
tankhold and
that
the contamination be above action
levels 30
TAC
§334.302(a)(1),
(2),
and (3).
Pursuant
to 30 TAC
§334.310(t) and §334.322,
all initial abatement and emergency measures that
continue
after
72
hours
incLuding
continuous
phase-separated
product
recovery1
must
be
~reapproved by
the TNRtC
prior to implementation. Contact the
I NRCC Central
Office
Project
Coordinator
or
the local
TNRCC
Region
inspector
for
assistance.
Costs
for
initial
abatement
submitted in the Application for Reimbursement should be identified
and submitted with justification
to
the
TNRCC. All
costs associated with initial abatement
are subject to verification. All
upit
costs
tncurred during Inittal Abatement wilt
be reimbursed based on
these Retmbursable Cost Gutdettnes.
Costs for Initial Abatement must be preapproved after
72 hours.
Use the worksheet under Activity
02:
PSH Recoveiy to prepare cost proposals for additional abatement work.
Note: Please refer to the definition of “free product,” “recoverable free product,” and “free product
migration” in Appendix B.
4
ACTIVITY 02:
PHASE-SEPARATED
HYDROCARBON (PSH) RECOVERY
This
subsection will
be
used for
the
recovery of
Phase
Separated
Hydrocarbons
(P514,
Phase
Separated
Petroleum,
or
free product-
See
Note
below)
after
the
Initial
Abatement
phase.
In
addition, the worksheet in this section will
be
used for preapproval of Initial
Abatement activities
after
the first 72 hours of site work.
30 TAC
§334.310 (1)
states that the continuous recovery of PSH needs preapproval
after the Initial
Abatement period of 72
hours.
In
cases where free product poses an imminent danger to human
health,
safety, and the environment,
30 TAC
§334.79 requires that the
owner/operator remove P514
to
“the maximum extent practicable.” If an emergency
situation extends bçyond
72 hours,
contact
the TNRCC Central Office Project Coordinator or the local TNRCC Region inspector for assistance.
For non-emergency situations, the Release Report required by §334.77 (b) should be submitted with
a
workplan
and
cost
proposal
either
for
the
continued
recovery, ot
free
product
or
for
the
preparation of
an
Interim
Corrective
Action
Plan
(ICAP)
for
the
installation of
a
tree product
recovery system.
If the development of an
ICAP is approved, and the ICAP itself is approved, the
actual
installation
of
the
recovery
system
is
discussed
under
Activity
09:
Remediation
System
Installation,
Note:
Please
refer to the definitions of
“free product,” “free
product migration,” “LNAPL7
and “recoverable free
product”
in
Appendix
B.
(WORKSHEET FOR THE MANUAL RECOVERYOF PSH
AND CONTINUING INITIAL ABATEMENT
Part A:
Personnel
Costs
Section
I:
1CM’
Generation
-
See
Note I
ITEM
ACTIVITY
FlOURS/UNiTS
RATE
TOTAL
1CAP
Preparationand
Saibnirsion
Lump
$i,825Oo
$i.815.OO
Total,
Section
I
$4,825.00
Section
2: Office
Costs (see
Note 2)
ITEM
ACTIVITY
HOURS/UNITS
RATE
TOTAL
FAR’ PSH
Recovery or System O&M
Report Preparation & Submission
I
$26000
$26000
ProjectManager (PM)
Managcrnent/Rtgulalory
Interaction
.5/Month
$80.00
Staff
c/Gill
(SF)
Data Review/Update rues
S/Month
$7000
Cost PropouailWorkptan
Coat
PeoposalAvorlcpian Prepaeadon & Submission
i
$115.00
SI
500
Total,
Section
2
S
ACTIVITY
#OE
WELLS
SMELL
TOTAL
P514 ‘75’
deep
$40.00
P514.
76’ To 110!
deep
$60.00
P514.
I 10’
deep
$80.00
Subtotal.
Stetion I
of Site
Visit.
Total, Section 3
TOTAL
PART A
UNITS
UNIT
COST
TOTAL
$10.00
$35000
$750.00
~ts.oo
$40.00
$20.00/Site/Day
Subtotal, Part
B
15
Mark’op
TOTAL, PART
B
.
UNIT
COST
UNITS
TOTAL
r5.oofl4oar
$0.40/Gallon
Subtotal
10
Mark-up
TOTAL.
PART C
UNITS/HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
$140.00/Day
$0.31
$40.00/Hour
6
Aufart
Per Diem
$80.00/Day
TOTAL, PART
U
Part E:
Other
Costs~See Note)
ITEM
UNITS
RATE
TOTAL
Subtotal
15
Mark.up
TOTAL, PART
E
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS
A-E
Notes:
1:
Pleaserefer
to Appendix A: Unit Costa for
a beeakdowst of tepoetgentratioo
costa.
2:
Please refer
to Appendix
A: Unit
Costs foes breakdown
ofpersonnel
Costa,
3:
Mark.upis
foe subcoostacted eapensca only.
4:
Please refer to
the lard
section
ofAppes,dix A: Unit Costs before preparing this
Section.
7
ACTIVITY 03:
EXCAVATION/WASTE
MANAGEMENT
This subsection will be used when contaminated
soils will
be excavated, transported
and disposed,
or
when
a significant quantity
of
contaminated
water collects
in
an
excavation.
LSo
not
use this
section for the disposal of
soil or water generated
as a result of other activities,
such
as drilling,
remedial system installation,
groundwater monitoring, or operation, maintenance,
and performance.
That waste management
is included as a Ime item
in those activities. The worksheet presented
below
has
been
dIvIded
based
on sub-phases of the overall
activity.Not
all parts may
be applicable to
all
situations, so
use
only those sections that
are
specific to your needs to determine reimbursable costs.
WORKSHEET
FOR EXCAVATION/WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOILS
TABLE
-
Determining
tbe Quantities to
be
Used
in
the Worksheet
EXCAVATED UNIT
WIDTH (FT)
LENGTH (VT)
SURFACE AREA (SQFT)
DEPTH
(VT)
IN SITU VOL
(CFT)
IN
SITU VOL
(CV)
Original
Excavation
Overexcavation Area I
Overeacavation
Area2
Overexcavation Ares 3
Overexcavation Area4
Total
Surface Area, Areas
-4, in Square
Feet
Total
in
Situ
Volume,
areas
1.4,
in
Cubic Yards
Part
A: Personnel Costs
Section
I: Office and
FixedField
Coats
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
Project Massager (PM)
Management,
Regulasoay Interaction
I
$8000
5(6000
Field
E/G/H
(FO)
initial
site aet.up and
coordination
3
$65.00
$195.00
Field
Activity
Repott
Preparation and
Submission
I
$455.00
$485.00
Worlsplam’Cosl Ps-oposal
Preparation
and
Submission
I
$115.00
$115.00
Total, Section I
$995.00
Section
2:
Field Oversight Costs
.
See
Nose
I
ITEM
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
Field F/G/H
(ED),
Technician
II (T3)
(Total From Seib Table)
$5.00/C?
Total,
Section 2
TOTAL,
PART A
Part
B: Excavation and Remove/Replace Cover
-
See Note
2
ACTIVITY
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
Remove
Cover (Asphalt)
.
Total
From Soils Table
$2.50/SqFt
Remove
Cover
(Concrete).
Total
From Soils Table
54.00/SqFt
S
Excavate Soils
‘Total In Situ Voisune Front
Sod, Table
$9.00/C?
Visqueen, I
lot
100 rolViOO cy. I roll nininun
$6000/Roll
Import Backfill.
Total
In Situ
Volume from
Soils Table N
1.3
$11 .00/C?
Compact
Backfill
$9.00/C?
Replace Cove,’ (Aoplsalt)
.
From Soilo Table
$3.50/SqFt
Replace Cover (Concrete)
.
From
Soila Table
$5.50/SqFe
Disposables (I unit
pee
sire day)
$2000
Ssshsoa.L Part B
t5
Mark-tsp
.
TOTALPARTS
Part C: Waste
Managemetst
Costs-
See Note 3
ACTIVITY
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
Load
& Haul Excavated
Soils. Total
In Situ
Volume from
Soils
Table N
1.3
$14.00/CY
Mileage
for Soils Disposal, 50
miles one
way
Loaded Mile
$2
50/mile
Dispose Soils
1500
TPH
in Landfill’See
Note
4
$10 50/C?
Dispose Soiisl500
TPH
in Landfill
$45.00/C?
Diapoae Soils
1500
‘EPH by Aaphals Recycling
$35.00/C?
Disport Soils1500
1PM
by
Bioremediation
~5.00/C?
Di,postSoilslSOOTPHbyThennal
Desoaption
$45.00/Cl
Vacuum Tnsck (Fluids
Transpont
(‘or
Disposal)
$75
00/Me
Fluids
Disposal
.
SO
40/Gal
Subchapter H
Discharge
or Alternate Diaposal
Method (Descnbe
in
Woek plan)
As Needed
Subtotal, Part C
10
Marlt.up
TOTAL, PART C
Part D: Analytical Costs
-
See Note S
ITEM
UNITS
UNIT
COST
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
UNIT
COST
TOTAL
TPH
.
Soil
$47.50
TCLP Lead
$93.00
TPH
(Rusts). Soil
$71.25
TCLP Be,szene
$152.00
BTEX’Soil
$62.50
TPH’Water
$49.00
BTEX (Rssalx) -Soil
$93.15
TPH (Rush)’
Water
$13.50
PAH
(SlOG)- Soil
1148.00
BTEX- Water
$62.50
PAM
(8270)
.
Sod
$222.00
BTEX (Ruth).
Water
$93.75
Total Lead.
Soil
$31.00
Total Lead -Water
$3 1.00
Total Lead (Rush). Soil
546.30
Total Lead (Rush)
‘
Water
$46
50
TON
.
Soil
$95.00
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
9
8
RCRA
Mesals- Soil
$150.00
(Other)
I
Subtstal,
Part B
10
Mark-up
TOTAL, PART
B
Part E: Travel
Costs- See Note 6
ITEM
UNIT COST
Equipment
Tnsck
1140.00/Day
Mileage
(ovrr
1(10,
Round Trip)
$0.3
I/Mile
Travel Time
$50.00 or $65.00/Flour
Per
Diem
$80.00/Day
Airfare
flyt4etd
TOTAL
ACTIVITY COSTS,
Noses:
Ir
Peeap.peoval and
aeimbutsemensv.ill be based
on theexpectationstsat 300.C? of soils
can be
excavated, ,saaed assdsampted na l0-hourda~j,
and
thas 300c? oftoilsean
loaded,isauled, and
dssposetfwluie
300 CV of soils
can
be
insposted and
compacted, agam
in
a
single day.
Oversight Ime may
be split
oanongpertonnel
many
way the RCAS
deasres.
The
$5.00
per cubic
yard
of
excavated
sods is
the
maximcsns reutsbursabk
cost
for
all phase.
0’
the acuvssy.
if
the actsvisy consssts
of
otsly
ilsspostngot
prevsosssly
stockplsled sorts and/or rmportsng
and compacting
fall, the
overssght
coat will be
$2.50/C?.
2:
Refer
to
Appendix
A,
Pan 6 for
a beesidown ofthese
costs. Made-up is
allowed
ott subconwacsed costa only.
3:
Referto Appendix
A, Pan7 for
a breakdown
ofthese
costa.
4:
The
nosrdcostfoedisposalofimpacsed soils
is
a
maximum witltoutjssseifscation.
Reimbursable coals
will be
actssal landfsllreceipts,
plus allowable mark-up. Trarssporl
anti laistirsltreceipis muasbe
submitted with
the
appltcasson for reimbursensent
5:
Refer to Appendix
A,
Pan 2
for
a breakdown
of
analytical costs.
6:
Referto Appendix
A.
Pars
4
for
a breakdown ofsravel
costs
to
ACTIVITY 04:
SITE ASSESSMENT
This subsection wilt be
used for the installation of welts or
borings to define the injpact of a release
or
when the
installation of a remediation
system
is approved
by
the TNRCC.
I he
worksheet
is
divided to allow
the preparation of numerous types of cost proposals based on need. Use only those
sections that are required for the specific phase of work. A Risk Assessment (RA)
will
normally be
done in conjunction with Site Assessment work,
and
those report generation costs are included here.
If
a site does not require
additional field work to complete
an
RA, refer to
Activity 05: Risk
Assessment.
WORKSHEET
FOR
SITE ASSESSMENTS
Part
A:
Personnel Costs
-
See Note I
Section
I
Plarming,
Fised
Field
and
Office
Costs,
Gaining Olt-sitr Access
-
See
Note 2
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT
COST
FlOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Prelinsissary Planning
-
See Note
3
Site Familiarization
$390.00
I
Water WeIli Other
Facili5~
Search
ldenti~Other
Wells/FacilitiesNear
Sise
$300.00
I
Walking
Receptor Suuvey
Field
Time
to tdenti&
Receptors
$300.00
I
Site’Monitoring Well Sun’ey
Determine
Well Elevations
$300.00
I
Wotkptar/Cosss Psoposal
PTepar.sion and
Submission
$115.00
I
$115.00
Offaiee Accost- See Note
3
Research
ownership
and
make initial
weiiten
requestfor
Oftstee Dnlitng
$320.00/Offsite Property
Total, Section
1
Section
7: Variable
Office
and
Field
Personnel Costs
-
See
Noee
4
Subsection 2A:
Basic
Report Generation
Coats
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
No
Report
Required
Submit Results (Labs and
Dnllem’ Logs)
Only
10.00
0
FAR
-
Site Assessment
Preparation
and
Submiusion
.
$485.00
I
Plan
A
Risk
Aasessnens
Repoer Fotsu
Preparation
and
Submission
52,140.00
I
Plan
B
Risk
Assessment
Preparation
and
Submission
$5,715.00
I
R.A Update
Preparation
and
Submission
$485.00
I
Total, Subsection 2A
Suboectios 28:
Additional Office Personnel
Coats, Conventional
Drilling,3
Walls/Borings per event
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Project Manager (PM)
Project
Overaighe
$40.00/Well or Boring
Drafisperson
I (Dl)
Boeing &
Well
Logs, CAD
$22.50/Well or
Boring
Word Processor
(WP)
Report Prep
ll.SOMeli orBoring
Total, Sttbtection 28
Subsection 2C: Additional OfFice
Personnel
Coats,
Direct Push
I
11
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Project Manager (PM), Itt
Day
Project Oversight
$80.00
2
$160.00
Draftspecsossl(Dl), tsrDay
BoriesgAWellLogs,CAD
$4500
2
$90.00
Word Processor(Wp),
tsr
Day
Report Prep
$35.00
I
535.00
Project Manager (PM),
Each Addt’I
‘/5 Day
Project Oversight
$40.00
Ilraftsperson
I
(Dl),
Each Addt’I ‘h Day
BoringA Well Logs, CAD
522.50
Word Processor (WP),
Each Addt’l
5
Day
Report
Prep
$17.50
Total, Subsection 2C
Subsection 2D:
Drilling in Sand/Silt/Clay with Follow Stem
Augers
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Field
Etsgineer/Gtologist(FD)
Sc Technician
1(11)
install Borssgs, 25’
Minimsun,
Lssrap
Suns,
2 Mrs/Boring
$220.00/Boring
Field Engineer/Geologist
(FD)&
Teclsnician
I (TI)
Install Wells, 25’
Minimum, Lump
Stain,
2.5
HrsAVelI
$275.00/Well
Field
Engineer/Geologist (PD) A Tcclmician
I
(TI)
Install Borings, Sum of Footage Over
25’, All Borings
$7.69/Foot
Field
Engitseer/Geologiss
(ED)
A
Technician
I (TI)
Install Wells, Sum
ofFoosageOver
25’.
All Wells
$9.91/Foot
Total,
Subsection 2D
Subsection 2E:
Drilling
with
Airflvlud Rosary
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT
COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Field
Engineer/Geologisl
(ED)
Sc
Teclsnsictan
I (TI)
Install
Borings, 2$’ Minimum, Lunsp
Sun,,
1.25 Bra/Boring
$13800/Boring
Field
Engineer/Geologist (Ft3) & Technician
I (TI)
Install Wells, 25’ Minissssam,
Lump
Ssszn,
2.5 lics/WrIl
$275.00/Well
Field
Enginerr/Cieologtar (FD) &
Technician I (TI)
Install Borings, Sum offoolage
Over 25’. All
Borings
$5
2/Foot
Field
Etginerr/Cieologist (PD)
A
Technician
I (TI)
tnsrall Wells, Sum
of Footage Over 25’, All Wells
$940/Fool
Total.
Subsection 2E
Subsection
2F: Dnlling with Air Coring
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Field Engineer/Geologist
(FO)
A
Technician I (TI)
Install
Borings, 25’ Minisntttn,
Luutsp Suns, 2
His/Boring
$220.00/Boring
Field Engineer/Geologitr
(PD) &
Technician I (TI)
Install Wells, 25’ Minimum, Lump Sum,
2.5 Her/Well
527500/WeIl
Field Engmeer/Gcologist (ED) &
Technician I (TI)
Install Borings.
Sum
of Footage Oner
2$’, All Borings
$733/Foot
Field
Engineer/Geologist
(FD) &
Technician
I (TI)
Install Wells. Sum of Foorage
Over 25’, All Wells
$9.57/Foot
Total, Subsection
2F
Sobsectioss
20: Direct Psash
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Field Engmeer/Oeologiat (PD) &
Teclusician I (TI)
First
Day, Lump Suits
$1,100.00
I
51,10000
Field
Engineee/Geologiss(PD) & Technician (TI)
Each Additional ~
Day
1550.00
Total, Subsection 20
Total,
Section
2
‘
12
TOTAL,
PART
A
Uritlhsg Costs
-
Sc
I: Conventional Drillin
e Note
g Coats
S
Subsection IA: Worksheet
Foe Conventional Drilling Costs
Drilling Method:
—
Hollow
Stem Augers
Air/Mud Rotauy
Air Coring
BORINGS
2’
WELLS
4’ WELLS
UNITS
S/UNIT
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
$/UNIT
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
S/UNIT
TOTAL
Feet
First 25
Feet
Fires 25
Fret
26’SOFeet
26’S&Feel
Fret
SI
-
lOOFeet
51’
100 reel
lOOFers
lOOFeel
SUBTOTAL
F
SUSTOTA
5
L
SUBTOTAL
G’
WELLS
._
0ThER
-
SUBTOTALS
UNITS
S/UNIT
TOTAL
ITEM
UNITS
$UNIT
TOTAL
BORINGS
Fees
Fitsl 25 Feel
2’ WrIls
‘
Feel
26
-
50
Fees
4
Wells
Fret
51-100
Feet
6” Wells
lOoFees
Giber
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
Total,
Subsection IA
Subsection
Its:
Oilier Costs, Convensional Drilling
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COSTS
UNITS
TOTAL COST
Mobilination/Dcmobiliiasir,n
Fuss 50
Miles, One Way
$245.00
I
Mobilizatioti/Demobiliralion
Mileage
50,
Maxiasaum Additional
200
One Way
$2.50/Mile
Per Dinn
Each Overnight Slay, IfRequired
$190.00/Day
(I
usia’
site
day)
$20.00
Total.
Subsection lB
Subtotal, Section I
15
Mark-tap
Total, Section I
2: Direct
Psash Technology
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT
COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Unit
lnsaali Borings
$1,480.00/Day
Unit
Install Wells, Over Sraradaa’d
Unit
Cost
SI2.50/Foot
Unis
install Borings, if Total Footage I
l~
Feel
$1250/Fact
MobilizaeiowDemobilization
First 50 Miles, One
Way
$145.00
I
Mobilization/Demobilization
Mi)eage-50,
Maxianun, Additional
200, One Way
SI 9OflvSile
13
Drill Crew
Per Diem
Each Overnight
Stay,
If Required
$ 150.00/Day
Small
Items (I
ianie/
site day)
$20.00
Subtotal, Section
2
15
Mark-up
Total,
Section
2
TOTAL, PART
B
Pad C: Waste Management Costs- See Note
7
ITEM
UNIT
COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuum
Tmek
$75.00/Thur
Fluids Disposal
.
50.40/Galloas
Soils
Disposal
$250.00 Base
+
$I0.So/CY
Sotln Diapoasl
5250.00 Base
+
£4500/Orson
Subchapter H
Discharge
or Alternate Disposal
Method
As Needed
Subtotal. Part C
ID’!. Mark-up
TOTAL, PART C
Part
U: Analytical
Costs
-
See Note
6
ITEM
UNITS
UNIT COST
TOTAL
TPII
-
SosI
$47.50
BTEX
-
Soil
$62.50
TPH
-
Water
$49.00
STEX
-
Waler
562.30
BTEX/MTBE
-
Water
$85.00
Total
Lead
-
Soil
531.00
PAH (g100)
-
Soil
$141.00
PAH(610)-
Water
£158.00
PAH
(1270)
-
Soil
$222.00
PAH (1270)
-
Waler
$249.00
TOS
-
Water
$5500
VOC
-
Soil
$295.00
VOC
-
Water
£295.00
RCR.A Metals
-
Soil
$150.00
Soil
Para,netee,
$300.00
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
(Other)
(Other)
14
Subtotal, Part B
10
Mark-up
TOTAL. PART
B
Part E: Travel Costs
-
See Note
8
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Truck
5)40.00/Day
Mileage
(ovrr
100.
Round Trip)
$0.3 I/Mile
Travel
Time (Field
Engineer/Geologiat and/or Teclsnieiats I)
$65.00 and/or $40.00/Hour
Per
them
580.00/Day/Person
Airfare
By Need
Ditposable
Railers
$l.00AVeIl
Drums
$40.00
TOTAL.
PART E
TOTAL
ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS A-E)
-
N
a sea:
I:
Please refer
to
Appendix A,
Pail
I for
abreakdown
of
personnel
cotta.
2:
Not
all
ofthese
activities are applicable
to
all
siren.
Use
on&
the items
that
relate
directly
to
the site for which
this
worksheet
is
being
used. Ifa
licensed
surveyor needs so be
aubconb’aceed
and
thae cost exceeds the noted
maximum of$300.00,
submie
quotes with
the cost proposal.
3: “Frektesiseaey Planning”
clsaeges apply only to
siteswheeea Risk
Aesessnsesse
sat noe beets performed, Preliminary
Plapasing aclavitiesslsoiild
iascludea site ltiseoey
eeview. area geolo~/bydeogeology/
lithology
researrh, and
the
incorporation
ofuae sensitive reee,plor
survey data
into the
proposal for
Ic
nsk
assessment. Tame, lee
the
Pielimmasy Planning eolssitts
oflwo
hours
each ol Project
Manages, Staff GeDlogistCEngsneer,
and Technscuan
II
tun~.These costs
do
notneedpneapproval pnor to completing the
acssvunes becaose they are itself In peep4re
i/se.Sitc
Aascstnsent
wodyslan
and
cosepropoaal.
Prelunmasy
Plaruasasg costs muslbe included in lhatcoslpropotaJ
and
be approved
bythe
TNRCC
lobe
reunbursable.”Offsite
Access” coals
include
activities through tile initial written
request
aor access,
lithe
iraissal written
request
at
denied,
an
additional 5320.00’s
available for
the increased
level
of effort,
lfthese costs
are mcuntd,
they muss be documented upby
submining all
wnisen
con’rspondence
wath the
ofl’sste landowner to
the TNRCC with
the
application for reimbursement,
All
offsite accesa
coals that
exceed $640.00 must be
preapproved through a change
ordse.
4:
Not
all
ofthese acbv~larsare applicable
to
all
sites,
LIar only
the
items
that
relate directly
to
the sile for
which
this
worksheet it being used,
Refer
to
Appendix
A,
Pars I
for
Report
Generation
Costa.
5:
Please
refer so
Appendix
A, Past
3
for cost broken out
by media.
Use
only
one
convesalional drilling meshed
for Section
A.Use
only
the
items that relate directly to the tile
for
which
this
worksheet
as being
used. Mark-up may
only
be
applied so subcontracted
cotta.
6:
Please
refer to Appendix
A,
Pars
2 for
additional laboratoty analyses and costs,
Mask-asp
is allowed
only
on sasbconflacted
iseliss.
‘1:
Please
refer to
Appendix
A,
Pass?
for
a breakdown
of
waste managenscnl costs.
8:
Please
refer to
AppendIx A,
Pair4
fqr
a breakdown
ofu’avel
policy
and costs.
‘Travel
T’m,e’
coats are based on
the individual(s) traveling to
the site on
specific days
to
perfonn
specific
tasks.
Define
the work
schedule in
thr
worlsplan
to
back
up all
travel
requetis.
ACTIVITY
05:
RISK ASSESSMENT
This subsection will
be used
when the need exists
to
quanti!~’
the risk of the contamination
at a
site.
There are
two
Risk
Assessments (RAs)
that will normally
be conducted,
and a~e
known as “P!an A”
and
“Plan B”
RAs. If sufficient assessment work has
been
done at
a
site,
it
may
be possible to
generate either a Plan A or a Plan B
RA without conducting frirther field work. If additional field
work is
necessary
to generate an RA,
please refer
to “Activity 04:
Site Assessment.” The costs
noted here are for reportgeneration only.
PLAN A
RISK ASSESSMENT
REPORT GENERATION COSTS
-
Sec Note
1
15
PERSONNEL TYPE
RATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Pnncipal
Esgiscer (P3)
$110.00
I
$110.00
Project Manager (PM)
$10.00
2
$960.00
StaffCieologiailEngineer (SF)
$70.00
S
$560.00
Draftspersors
1(02)
$50.00
6
$300 00
Word Processor~WP)
,
$35.00
6
$210.00
TOTAL
$2,140.00
PLAN BRISK ASSESSMENT REPORT GENERATION COSTS- See
Note I
PERSONNEL
TYPE
RATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Principal Engineer
(P3)
$110.00
6
$66000
Project Massager (PM)
$80.00
32
$1,560.00
Suffceologiac’Engineer (SF)
$70.00
25
$1,750.00
brafisperaon II
(D2)
550.00
50
550000
Word Procesior (WP)
$3500
7
$245.00
TOTAL
$3,715.00
No
tea:
I: A
lois
of$ 115,00 above the
noted
costs
is
available for reinsbisrsing the
coat ofthe
woekplan and
coal proposal
to
gesaente
a “stand alone” rink
assessment.
Please
refer
to
1’NRCC Guadance
Manuals when perfoisning
(ask
Assestmenss.
16
ACTIVITY 06:
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
FEASIBILITY TESTING
This
subsection will
be
used when testing is required to complete a CAP. This testingS may
include
aquifer pump tests, slug
and bail tests? soil
vapor extraction tests, or a combination oTany of these
tests. Costs
are Included
in this activity to format information gained in the
field for Inclusion into
the CAP Testing
Report. For
the cost of generating
the CAP, use the section entitled “Activity 08:
Corrective Action
Plan
(CAP) Preparation.”
Part
I of the worksheet is designed to provide reimbursable personnel costs for the various
kinds of
tests to be conducted at the
site,
whether 6-hour,
12-hour, or 24-hour tests, The costs for each kind
oftest should
be added together to
reflect total personnel costs for the activity. Then complete the
subsequent
parts
ofthe worksheet relating to equtpment,
Lab testing, waste disposal, and
travel time
for the specific tests being conducted
to obtain total activity costs.
WORKSHEET
FOR CAP
TESTING
Worleplasa
Sc
Coat
Proposal
$115.00
$11500
Part
A:
Personnel Costs
-
See Note
1
Section
1:
Slug
and Bail
Teabag
ITEM
ACTIVITY
RATE
FlOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Seniar
Engiaeer/Oeologiai(P2)
OfficePreparation. Project
Management, Debriefing
595.00
3
5285.00
Field
Engineer/Geologist (FD)
Office Preparation,
Field Work, Debriefing
$65.00
0
$650.00
Aaaociale
Eng’ineer/Geologisl (P1)
Data Analysis, Report
Ps’eparalion
$85.00
5
5425,00
Technician
Ii
(T2)
Office Preparation,
Field Work, Debriefing
$45.00
0
$450.00
Drafesperton 11(02)
Data Pansaatsing
$50.00
I
$50.00
Word
Processor (WP)
Data Fomsaning
$35.00
2
$70.00
Additional i/sac
over6
boats’s
Field
Sac, including FD and T2
$110.00
P1.7
Standard Eseniption
Fonts
Preparation
and
aubmission
$195.00
If Required
Workplaas & Coats
Proposal
$115.00
I
$115.00
Section
I
Section
2:
Aquifer
Pump Tearing
ITEM
ACTIVITY
LATE
HOURS/I/NIl’S
TOTAL
Senior
Engineer/Geologiai (P2)
OfficePrepas’aliora,
Projecs Managesnens, Debriefmg
595.00
3
5285.00
Field
Engiaeee/Geoiagist
(FD)
Office Preparation, Field
Work, Debriefing
$65.00
10
$65000
Aaaociate Engineer/Geologiss (PS)
Dais
Analysis,
Repors Prepas’asion
555.00
5
$425.00
Technician
II
(T2)
Office Pa’eparatioa,
Field
Work.
Debriefing
$45.00
0
$450.00
Drafispersan
II (Dl)
Data
Forisaaning
$50.00
I
$50.00
Word Processor (WP)
‘
Data
Analysia.
Report
Preparation
$35.00
2
570.00
Additional i/inc over 6 hoist’s, per hour
Field
time, including Fl) and TI
$110.00
P1.7 Siassdard
Exemption
Fonni
Preparation
and
submission
$195.00
lfReqiaired
17
Total,
Section 2
Section 3:
Soil
Vapor Exoaction
Testing
ITEM
ACTIVITY
RATE
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Sencor
Eng’isscee/Geotogist(P2)
Office Preparation, Projets Managemens,
Debriefmg
595.00
3
5255.00
Field
Engineer/Geologist
(ED)
Office Preparation, Fieldwork,
Debriefing
$65.00
ID
$650.00
Associate Engineer/Geologist
(P1)
Data
Aeaalysin, Report
Preparation
$85.00
5
5425.00
Technician H
(T2)
Office Preparation, Field
Work, Debriefing
$45.00
10
$450.00
Draftsperson
II (02)
Data
Fonsaatting
$50.00
I
$50.00
Word
Processor (WIt)
Ossa Analysis, Report
Preparation
535.00
1
570.00
Additional
i/asic over6 bourn,
per hour
Field
tiisse, including El)
and T2
$110.00
P5.1 Sanaidard
Esemption Fonts
Preparation and
submission
$195.00
liRequiced
Wnrkplan
&
Coal Proposal
5115.00
I
$115.00
Total,
Section
3
Section 4.
Dusl’Phase
ExFaction Testing
ITEM
ACTIVITY
RATE
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Seaior
En5ineer/Geologist (92)
Office Prepaaation, Project
Management, Debriefusg
$95.00
3
$285.00
Field
Engineer/Geologist (FD)
Office Preparation. Field
Work, Debriefing
$65.00
IS
$975.00
Aoaociaee Engiaeer/Oealogite(Pt)
Data Analysis, Report Preparation
$85.00
5
$680.00
Technician II (T2)
Office Preparation, Field
Work, Debriefing
$45.00
IS
$675
00
Drsflsperson II (D2)
Data
Foisnatting
$50.00
2
$100.00
Word Processor (‘AP)
Data Ai~alysis,
Report
Preparation
535.00
3
$10500
Additional
iissse over 6 hours, per hour
Field
tisne, including FD
and
T2
$110.00
PS”? Ssaadaid
Exemption Font
Preparation
and
aubmisaion
5195.00
IfRequired
Workptaas &
Coat Proposal
$115.00
I
$115.00
Tatal.
Sectina
4
TOTAL, PART
A
Part
B: Equipment
Costs
-
See Note
2
ITEM
UNIT COST/DAY
UNITS
TOTAL
Datalogger (2
channel)
$65.00
Daealogger(t
chassael)
$115.00
Oeseeatoe (3500 Watt)
$75.00
Compresuor(5
Horsepower)
$25.00
Pressure Transducer
$35.00
Igs
cflsi Compressor
$95.00
Regenerative blower (1.5
Horsepower)
$20.00
Liquid ring ptsmp (for dual’.phase exFacsion test)’
See
Note
3
5650.00
IS
SVE Trailer (contains all equipment)
$500.00
Air noipper
$250.00
HoIsting
tank (1,000 Gallon)
$25.00
Carbon Canister,
includes installation, recycling,
atsclioc
disposal
$750.00
Holding Tank (5,000 Gallon)
$35
00
Small
hems
$20.00/Site/flay
Miscellaneous
Supplies
$50.00/Test
(Other)
(Other)
Subtotal, Part
B
15
Mark’up
TOTAL, PART
B
Part C: Waste Management Costs
-
See Note 4
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
.
TOTAL
Vacuuasa
Truck
$75.00/Hour
Fluids Disposal
$0.40/Gallon
Subchapter H
Diachaa~eorAlternate
Disposal
Method (Describe in Work Plan.)
As Needed
Subtotal, Part C
tOt~u
Mtrk’stp
TOTAL,
PART C
Fart 1): Analytical Costs
-
See NoteS
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
TPH
(Water)
$49.00
BTEX (Water)
$62.50
BTEX (Air)
$62.50
Total
Lead (Water)
$31.00
(Other)
(Other)
Tedlar Bags far Air Sainplea
$7.50
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
Subtotal, Part
0
10
Mark’up
TOTAL,
PART
B
Part
E:
Travel Costs- SeeNote
6
I
19
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Truck
$140.00/Day
Mileage (over
100, RoundTrip)
$0.3 I
Travel Tinse (PD and
T2
combined)
$1
0.00/Hour
Per Dicm
$5O.0O/PetsorsOay
Airfare
By Need
TOTAL, PARTS
TOTAL
ACTIVITY COSTS,
PARTS A-E
Notea:
I: Please
refer
to
Appendix A,
Pan I for
a breakdown
ofpersonnel costs,
2: Please
refer
to
Appendix A,
PastS
for a
breskdowss ofequipment
costa, Made’up
is
allowed
for rented
items
only
and rental receipts
must accompany
Use application for reimbumement.
3:
Every effort should be
made
10 schedule
two
sires
consecutively
for
testing
with
a liquid-ring
pump
due
to the high
rental coals
for this equipment
4:
Please refer
In Appendix
A,
PatS
7 for
a brcakdowas of waste managensenl costa.
5: Please refer to Appendix
A,
Part
2 for additional laboratory
analyses and costs.
Made-up
is
allowed only
on subconbscred iteiasa.
6: Please refer to Appendix
A,
Part 4 for a
breakdown ofteavel
policy and
costs.
20
ACTIVITY 07:
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
This
subsection
will
be
used
at
sites
where
no
remediation
system, is
kn
operation
but
periodic
groundwater monitoring will
be conducted, or when groundwater testIng is necessary to determine
if natural attenuation is an appropriate remedial option for
a, site.
Sites where
a re,medtation
system
is in operation
and
groundwater monitoring is also required will
use the section entitled “Activity
10:
Operation, Monitoring, & Performance’
to develop cost proposals.
WORKSHEET
FOR GROUNDWATER
MONITORING
Part
A:
Personnel Costs
-
See Note I
Section
I:
Fixed Annual
Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Project Manager (PM)
Managesnent, Regulatory
Interaction
$80.00
5
$400.00
FAR’
A,’mual Groundwater Monisming
Report
Perpanslion
and Submiaaion
$440.00
I
FAR
‘Single Monitoring Everal
Preparation
and Submiaaion
$260.00
I
Workplan &
Cost Proposal
Preparation
and
Submission
$115.00
I
$115.00
Total, Section I
Section 2:
First Quaa’rer Personnel
Costa orSingle Monitoring Event
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
StaffEngineerfGeologisr(SF)
Field Preparetiots,
Data Fomsatting
$70.00
2
$14000
Technician
I (TI)
Purge and
Sample Wella,
Firat
25’
$40.00/Well
Technician
I (TI)
Purge and
Sample Wells,
Facts Additional 25’ (75’
Max)
$IO.00/Additional 25W/elI
Total, Section
2
Sersion
3~Second Quaner
Personnel
Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
,
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
SiaffEnganeer/Geologist (SF)
Field Preparation, Data Forssaalsing
$70.00
2
$140.00
Technician I (TI)
Purge and
Sample
Wells,
Firse 25’
$40.O0/ Well
Technician I (TI)
Purge and
SampleWells, Each Additional 25’ (75’
Max)
$10.00/Additional
25’TWeli
Total,
Section
3
Section
4:
Third Quarter Petsonasel
Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
StaffEngirieer/Geologist (SF)
Field Preparation. Data Forsssateiasg
$70.00
2
$140.00
Technician I (T I)
Purge and Sample
Wells,
First 25’
$40.0O/ Well
Technician
I (TI)
.
Purge and
Sample
Wells,
Each Additional 25’ (75’ Max)
$10.00/Additional 25/Well
Total,
Section
4
SectionS: Fourth Quarier
Personnel Costa
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
21
Stall
Enginets/Oeologsst (SF)
Field
Preparation, Gala Fonasattissg
$10.00
2
3140.00
Technician
I (TI)
Purge and
Sample
Wells,
heel
25’
540.00/ Well
Technician
C (TI)
Purge and
Sample Wells, Each Additional
25’ (75’ Max)
$ 10.00/Additional 25/Well
Total, Section 5
TOTAL. PART A
Part B:
Equipment Costs
-
Sec Note
2
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Disposable bailes’s
tg.o0/.weIl
Small
itema
$20.00/site/day
Onmms (55-gallon, for purge
water)
$40.00
(Other)
(Other)
SubtotaL
Part
0
15
Mark’up
.
TOTAL,
PART
B
Part C; Waste Management Costs
-
See Note 3
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuwn Truck
$75.00/Hour
Fluid
Disposal
$0.40/Gallon
Subshaptee H
Discharge
orAltemate
Dispoeal
Method (Describe
ira Worlspltn)
As Needed
Subtotal, Pan
C
10
MarIe-up
TOTAL, PART
C
Part D; Analytical Costs
-
SeeNote
4
ANALYTICALTEST
UNITCOST
UNITS
TOTAL
TPI/BTEX
$111.50
TPH/BTEX
w/ MTBE
$134.00
TDS
$15.00
PAH
(610)
$158.00
PAH
(8270)
$249.00
Clsioridea
$18.00
Iron
$10.00
Nilratea
$24.00
Phoaplsatea
$24.00
Sulfates
$24.00
Total Organic Ctstaon çtOC)
$32.00
22
Shippmg
$5.00/Sample
(OTHER)
(OTHER)
Subtotal, Part
LI
50
Mark-sap
TOTAL, PART LI
Part
E: Travel Costs
-
See Note S
ITEM
UNIT
COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipmenl
Truck
$140.00/day
Mileage
(over 100
miles,
round rip)
$0.31/mile
Teasel Time
540.00/Isour
Per
Diem
StO.0O/day
Air Fare
fly Need
TOTAL,
PARTE
‘
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS AE
Nolan:
It
Please
refer to Appendbc
A,
Part
I
foe a breakdown
ofpersonnel costs, If Groiundwaeee Monitoring
is eeconsmeaadrd
maa resultofaCAP’
No Reinediation
System, the cost
for the
woekplan
and
cost peoposal will
be
included
as the
reimburtable cost for that CAP.
2: Please refer
ro Appendix
A, PanS for
a breakdowsa
ofequipmesst costs. Mark-up
a
allowed for
sabconawacsed
items only
arid receipts
must accompany the application eor mtimssbunrmene,
3:
Please
refer
to Appendix A,
Pass
7 for
a breakdown
ofwaate
management cost.
4:
Please refer
so Appendix
A, Part 2 for additional laboratory
analyses and
cosss. Masts-up is
allowed only
on
sisbooasteacted isenss.
Sasasplisag Ioninorganic
components is grssssdwaser can
and should
be
conductedusing
sield censors and
meters. An explanation for ekeease
of an
analyiscal laboratory
so
peetonas there
teals
meats’accompany
the woelcpIan
arid core proposal.
5:
Please refer
ro Appendix
A,
Part 4 for
a breakdown
ofeavel
policy
maid coats. The
TNRCC will
reimburse foe a
single TI
eo perform all
purging
mand sampling
duties, both in site
tame
maid ravel
tune
23
ACTIVITY 08:
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
PREPARATION
This subsection will
be
used at
sites where corrective action is necessary. ,The CAP will fall
into one
of
two
broad
categories. The first category
is
a CAP that
seeks to passively
reniediate the
sIte,
by
means of natural attenuation,
the effectiveness of which will
be confirmed by groundwater monitoring.
This
CAP
may
be developed followIng
eIther
a
Plan
A
or a
Plan
B
risk
assessment. The
second
category
is a CAP that recommends the installation of a remediation system
to actively !educe
the
contaminant levels to the pointwhere closure following a program ofgroundw~termonitoring can
be
achieved. This CAP will
be developed following the
submission of a
Plan
B
risk assessment.
Please
note
that, some
portions
of
these
CAPs
may
require
the
participation
of
a
Registered
Professional
Engineer.
Please
refer
to
30
TAC
§334.308
(g)
(21)
for
intormation
on
when
this
participation
is necessary.
CORRECTIVE
ACTION PLAN
-
NO REMEDIATION SYSTEM
PERSONNEL TYPE
RATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Senior
Engineer/Geologist (P2)
$95.00
I
$95.00
Project Manager (PM)
$80.00
2
$160.00
Staff Engineer/Geologist (SF)
570.00
4
525000
Word
Processor (WI’)
$35.00
3
$105.00
Project Manager’OM&P Plan
$80.00
2
$160.00
Staff Engiaerr/Oeologiss.OM&P Plan
$20.00
4
$280.00
Word
Peocessor (WP)-OM&P Plan
$35.00
2
$70.00
TOTAL
SI,I5&0O
CORRECTIVE ACTION
PLAN
-
WITH
REMEDLATION SYSTEM
(See
Notes)
PERSONNEL TYPE
RATE/HOUR
HOURS
TOTAL
Principal
Engineer (P3)
$110.00
4
$440.00
Associate
Eisgieiees’ (P1)
$85.00
30
52,550.00
Project
Massager
(PM)
U0.00
8
5640.00
SnalrEugineer/Geologirt (SF)
$70.00
24
$l,680.00
Oeaftspeeson
II (D2)
$50.00
20
$1,000.00
Word Peocessor
(WP)
535.00
10
5350.00
TOTAL
$6,660.00
Notes:
I:
The
listed costs include
gesaeaaeion
olmaps and
deaign drawisiga (no scale).
They
do not
include the
SI
15.00
available for the geneastion ofnlse wontplan
and
cost pToposal
to produce these plant.
2:
The
listed coats are fora baseline CAP
with
the installation
ofotte remediaeion syatem
(i.e., groundwater pusnsp &
a-eat,
dual-plsanc exs’action or soil
vapor extraction), Jualification should be
provided in the
wosleplan
and cost peoposal, based on site’specsfic
orcumslancrs and
the result of
CAP
letting, for our-of-scope rosin.
Rrqssesss (on prrappnovai wall
be revsewed ona case’by’case
basis.
3:
Quotemid preparation
cores are included
in the
CAP
generation costs.
24
ACTIVITY 09:
REMEDIATION SYSTEM
INSTALLATION
This subsection will
be used to submit a workpian
and cost proposal with either an Interim Corrective
Action Plan (ICAP) (see Activity 02) or Corrective ActionPlan
(CAP) (see Activity 08). Each of the
first four parts ofthe worksheet
(J~arts
A1-A4)
are
constructed around
one of four basic
systems: PSU
recovery, groundwater pump-and-treat, soil vapor extraction, and dual-phase extraction. Each of these
systems has
a baseline 9f three recovery wells.
Each oftheparts will
have the option of combining
other
systems
and
adding
or
subtracting
recovery
wells.
I his
will
allow
the
development of
an
installation and
start-up
cost that is relevant to the needs of your site. Only use the one of the first
four parts that is most appropriate to your site.
Because of the variable nature of remediation systems, the TNRCC has not developed standardized
system costs. Each
system will
be constructed to
meet site-specific remediation needs. The TNRCC
has
supplied various equipment
types
and equipment costs in Appendix A, Section
5,
Equipment and
Supplies. This
section may be referred to when acquiring quotes for costing out the system
designed
in the ICAP or CAP. If necessary equipment differs from that contained in Appendix A, the preparer
should
supply
three
quotes
with the
cost proposal. If the
tank owner/operator
is
in
possession of
appropriate
and fUnctional remediation equipment previously reimbursed by the TNRCC at another
site,
that equipment should be reused. The cost effectiveness of the proposed remediation system must
be supported by documentation
such as comparative quotes
and technical statistics.
If the rernediation program designed in the CAP isof short duration (9 months or less), or if the
use
of a capital
component in the remediation system
is expected to
be of short duration,
the option of
renting or leasing the mmediation system or the individual component should
be
evaluated. Sufficient
quotes
(at
least three per opuon) for eauipment lease/rental should
be
included with
a cost-benefit
analysis
in the installation cost proposal
Co allow
a determination of the most cost effective option to
be
made.
When the
remediation program designed
in the CAP
is of intermediate
length (9
to
24
months), the
option of purchasing and
leasing or leasing-to-own the remediation
equipment should
be
evaluated.
Again,
sufficient
quotes
(at
least
three
per
evaluated
option)
for
equipment
purchase/lease/lease-to-own sliould
be
included with a cost-benefit
analysis in
the
installation
cost
proposal to allow a determination of the most cost effective option to
be
made. If the remediation
program
designed
in
the
CAP
is
planned
to
last
in
excess
of
two
years,
remediation
equipment
purchase will
be considered
the
most
cost
effective option. At
least
three
quotes
for
equipment
purchase should
be
included with the installation cost proposal. The cost of rented/leased/leased-to-
own
equipment
will
be
reimbursed
in
the
preapproved
costs
for
Operation,
Monitoring,
&
Performance (see Activity
10). The
cost for purchased remediation systems will
be reimbursed
afier
the successful completion of the installation
and start-up of the system
in this Activity.
Please note that some portions ofthe
installation process may
require the participation of a Registered
Professional
Engineer.
Please
refer
to
30
TAC
§334.308 (g)
(21)
for information
on
when
this
participation is necessary.
WORKSHEET FOR REMEDIATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION AND START-UP
Part
Al: Consultant Office
and
Field Costs. ‘SR
Recovery System
-
See Note I
Section
I:
Installation
and
Startup of Baaie 3-well
System
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/IO1JRS
TOTAL
Senior
Engineer
(P2)
Project
Oversight
$95.00
I
$95.00
Associate
Engineer (P1)
‘
Managetnsent, Regulatoay
Instetaetion, Field
Oversight
$85.00
I
$595.00
SnaffE/G/H
(SF)
Field
Preparation, Installation
and
Searsup
$70.00
20
$1,400.00
Technician
II (T2)
Field
Preparation, Installation
and Startup
$45.00
32
$1,440.00
25
Pt-i
Standard Exemption Form
Prepaeation
and
Submissiosa
$195.00
if Reqssircd
FAR- System
Installation
Preparation
and
Submission
$855.00
I
$855.00
Woelsplan
and
Cost Proposal
Preparation aasdSubmiasion
5115.00
I
$115.00
Total,
Sect.ois
I
Section
2: Add/Delete Wells (Any
System)- Per Well
ITEM
-
ACTIViTY
UNtT
COST
LJNITS/OURS
TOTAL
Associate
Engineer (P1)
Management, Regulatory
Interaction
$85.00
I
$85.00
Staff Engineer
(SF)
Office Planssia.g
$10.00
I
$70.00
StaffEngineer
(SF)
Installation
and Startup
$70.00
4
$280.00
Technicianll(T2)
Ofticerrepaeaeion
$45.00
I
$45.00
Teclsnician II (T2)
Installation
and
Startup
$45.00
8
5360.00
S.abtotat,Seetiotn I
$840.00
H
sfWetl. to
Add/Detest
Total, Section 2
TOTAL,
PART
Al
Part AZ: Consultant
Office and
Field Costs, Groundwater
Pump-and-Treat System
-
See Note
1
Section
I: Installation
and
Startup oftsaaic 3-well System
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/OURS
TOTAL
Senior
Engineer (P2)
Project Oversight
$95.00
3
5285.00
Associate Etsgi,nee, (P1)
Management,
Regxsiatosy Inaseracsiosa,
Field Ovensighs
$85.00
8
5680.00
Associate
Engineer (P1)
Field Oversight
$85.00
9
5765.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
4
5250.00
SlaffEngincer(SF)
Installation
and
Starsup
$70.00
20
$1,400.00
Trchnicaan Ii (TI)
Office Peepanalion
545.00
2
590.00
Technician II (T2)
Installation and
Startup
$45.00
32
$1,440.00
P1-i
Standard Exemption Fosin
Preparation sad
Submission
$195.00
if Required
FAR-
System Installation
Preparation sad
Submission
$2,300.00
I
$2,300.00
Worieplan and
Coss Proposal
Pstpaealion and
Submission
$115.00
I
$115.00
Total,
Stetiota
I
Section
2:
Add Soil Vapor
E,uraction (SVE) System (3-well)
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Sensoe
Engeneer (P1)
.
Project Oversight
$95.00
1
$95.00
Associate
Engineer (Pt)
Management,
Regulatory Interaction
585,00
2
$170.00
Associate
Engineer (P1)
Fieldoversigiss
$55.00
2
$170.00
StaffEngineer (SF)
Office Plaaming
$70.00
2
$140.00
26
Staff Etsgmeer (SF)
Installation
and
Startup
$70.00
I
$560.00
Technician
II (T2)
Office
Preparation
$45.00
2
$90.00
Technician 11(12)
Installation and
Startup
$45.00
6
5720.00
Total, Section
2
51,945,00
Section 3:
Add Off-gas Treaosscns
Sysresn
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS(5OUP~S
TOTAL
Associate Engineer (P1)
Maasagesnent,
Regulatory
Interaction
$85.00
2
$170.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
I
$70.00
StaffErtgineer (SF)
Installation
and
Startup
$70.00
6
5420.00
Technsciaa II (T2)
Office
Preparation
,
$45.00
I
$4500
Technician
II (TI)
lnssallasion
and
Ssaelup
545.00
12
$540.00
Total, Section 3
51445,00
Section
4:
Add/Delete Wells (Any System)
-
Per Well
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITSRIOUIkS
TOTAL
Associate
Engineer (P1)
Managesnetsl, Regulatory Interaction
$85.00
I
$85.00
Staff Etsgirreer (SF)
Office Planting
$70.00
I
$10.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Installation
and
Ssartup
570.00
4
5280.00
Technician
II (T2)
Office
Preparation
545.00
I
$45.00
Technician
11(12)
Installation
and
Starlsap
$45.00
I
$360.00
Subtotal, Section 4
$84tLO0
N of W.115
to
Add/Delete
Total, Section 4
TOTAL, PART 42
Part A3: Consultant Office and
Field Costs, WE System
-
See Note 1
Section
I:
Installation and
Start-up offlaaic 3-well
System
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Senior
Engineer(P2)
ProjectOversight
$95.00
3
$285.00
Associate
Engineer (P1)
Managesnent, Regstlaloty
Interaction
$85.00
8
$680.00
Associate Engineer (PS)
Field Ovemighl
$85.00
9
$765.00
Staff Engiaseer (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
4
$280.00
SlaffErsgineer (SF)
Installation
and
Stanup
$70.00
S
$560.00
Teclsnscisas II (T2)
OfficePreparation
545,00
2
$90.00
Technician
II (T2)
Installation
and Startup
$45.00
20
$900.00
P1-7 Standard
Exemption Eons,
Preparation
and
Subminsion
5195.00
IfRequired
FAR- System
Installation
Preparation and
Ssatsrnsinioss
$2,300.00
I
$2,300.00
Workplan and Coat Proposal
Preparation
and
Submission
$115.00
I
$115.00
27
Total.
Sectiurs I
Section
2: Add Off-gas Treaunene Sysrem
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associate
Engineer (P1)
Management, Regulatory
Inleraction
$85.00
2
$170.00
Staff Esginree (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
I
$70.00
Ssaff Engineer (SF)
Installation and
Startup
$70.00
6
5420.00
Technician
It (T2)
Office
Preparation
$45.00
I
$43.00
Trchrriciaes
II
(T2)
Installation
and
Starlsap
$45.00
12
$540.00
Tstal. Section 2
$1,245.00
Section
3:
Add/Delete Wells
-
Per Well
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associate
Engineer (Pt)
Mas’sagcrnens,
Regulatory Interaction
$15.00
I
555.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office Planting
$70.00
I
$70.00
Stsdl’Enginerr
(SF)
Installation
and
Startup
$70.00
4
-$280.00
Tecisnicrart
II
(T2)
Office
Preparation
545.00
I
545.530
Technician
II (TI)
Installation and
Staasup
$45.00
S
$360.00
Subtotal. SectionS
5840.00
N
nfWella to
Add/Delete
Total,
Section 3
TOTAL PART Al
Part
A4:
Consultant Office and Field Costs, Dual
Extraction
System
-
See Note
I
Section
I:
Installation
and Start-up of Basic 3.welISystem
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Senior
Engineer
(P2)
Project Oversight
$95.00
3
$215.00
Associate
Engineer
(Pt)
Maasageanent,
Regulatory Interaction
$85.00
a
$68000
Associsse
Engineer
(Pt)
FieldOvemighs
$55.00
13
51105.00
Staff
Engrneer (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
4
$28000
Staff
Engineer (SF)
Instaliation and
Startup
$70.00
24
$1,680.00
Technician
II (T2)
Office
Pieparation
545.00
4
$180.00
Technician
II (T2)
Installation and Startup
545.00
40
$1,100.00
Pl.7 Standard
Exemption Form
Prepasation and
Submission
$195.00
If Required
I
28
FAR-
System
Installation
Preparation
and
Submission
$2,300.00
I
52)00.00
Wottptan
and Cost
Proposal
Preparation
and
Subrsstiaion
$115.00
I
$115.00
Total, Section
I
Section
2:
Add Off-gas Treatment
Systess
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT
COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associale Engineer (Pt)
Management,
Regulatory Interaction
$85.00
2
$170.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office Planting
$70.00
I
$10.00
Staff Engineer (SF)
lnntallation
and Startup
$70.00
6
542000
Technician II (T2)
Office
Preparation
545.00
I
$45.00
Technician
11(12)
Installation
and Srattup
$45.00
12
$540.00
Total,
Section 2
$1,245.00
Section): Add/Delete Wells-
PerWell
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Associate Engineer
(Pt)
Management, Regulasoty
Interaction
$5500
I
-
US 00
Staff Engineer (SF)
Office Planning
$70.00
I
$7000
Staff Engineer (SF)
Installation
and Startup
$70.00
4
$250.00
Technician
II (TI)
Office Preparation
545,00
I
$45.00
Technician
II (T2)
Installation
and Startup
$45.00
8
$360.00
Sutsassal, Section
3
$840.00
H
of Wella to
Add/Dettta
Total,
Section
3
TOTAL. PART A4
Part B:
Capital
Equipment Costs
-
See Note
2
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Air Csmpreasor
Air Staipping
Tower
Catalytic
Oxidizer
Control Panel
Oil/Water Separator
Pneumatic
Punsp
Electhc Oosvnholc
Pumps
Regrnetass’et Blowers
Hnldirrg Tar,4s
Carbon Polishing Unite
(Other)
(Other)
29
(Other)
I
Ssabtssal, Pars
B
15
Stark.up
TOTAL. PART B
Part C: Installation Costs
-
See Note 3
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT
COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Trenching
Sawcut and excavate
bench lines
I5.DatF
Plumbing
Inarall Piping (Air, Water, Elecuic)
in trenches
I5.00’LF
Resarface Excavations
Recover
trench lines
$6.00/LF
WeIthead
Modification
lnnsall welllsead
access boxes
At
COsl
Well Elecincs
Install switches
& drop
tubes
$200.00/WetI
Well Plumbtng
Instalt
air/waler tubing&
pumps
$200.00/Welt
Concrete
slab
Install
slab
for remedialion sysrem
$5.50/SqFt
Renscdiatios
compound fence
install
protective
fence around
system
$550.00
I
-
$850.00
Small
Items
$20.00/Silt/Day
Miscetlaaaeosss
Fittings, locks,
eec.
$100.00
t
510000
(Other)
(Other)
(Other)
Subtotal, Pare C
55
Mark-up
TOTAL PART C
Part D: Waste Management Costs- See Note 4
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNIT/HOURS
TOTAL
Load
and
Hair
Excavated
Soils
and
Concrete
$l4.00/CY
Dispose Excavated Soils
and Concrete
$10.25/CY
Vacuum
Tmck
$7S.00/H~
Dispose Fluids
$0.40/Gal
Ssbclsspree
H Discharge
orAlternative
Disposal Method (Describe is Work Plait)
As
Needed
Suabeotal, rail
D
10
Mark-up
TOTAL, PART B
Part E: System Performance Analytical Costs- See NoteS
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
30
TPH
(Wales)
549.00
BTEX
(Wales)
$62.50
BTEX(Air)
$62.50
STEX w/
MTBE (Water)
$85.00
TOTAL
LEAD(Wirer)
531.00
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
(OTHER)
(OTHER)
Subtotal, Part
E
10
MarIe-up
TOTAL,
PART E
Part
F: Travel Costs-
See Note 6
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment
Truck
$140.00/day
Mileage (over
100
miles.
sound trip)
$0.35/mite
Travel Tune
$115.00sboux
Per Diem
$80.00/day/person
Air
Fare
By Need
TOTAL,
PART F
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS Al, A2, A3, or A4
and B-F
Notes:
I:
Pleaserefer
so Appendix A,
Past
I for a breakdown ofpeesonsset costs.
2: Equipmenepurchased for the inntallatiots
ofa remediarion system will
be costed outby~uote
by the RC,AS
rn
the lrstericn Corrective Action
Plan (l~AP)
(see Activity 02), the Corrective
Action
Plan
(CAP) (see Activity
08),
or the workplss
and
cost pmpocal submitted for Remedlal System Installation
(see
Acuv,sy 09).
These
quotes muss be
included when
these documents are submitted
to
the
TNRçC.
Because of
the
isasrque
nature of each individual site,
said
the
range of equtpmenI types
available in
the induttsy,
tare RCAS
ahould destgn the remedaslaor,
system
with
buth efficiency
and
coss mmmd. The
coal
proposals toreemedisason
systems will be reviewed ott
a case-by-case
basss.
3:
Mark-sp is
allowed
foe subcontracted
teems orry
and
renla
orpurchase
receipts mutt accompany
the application for reimbursement
4:
Please refer
en Appendix
A. Part? for
a breakdown
ofwaste
management
costa.
5:
Please refer
to Appendix A.
Part
2
for additional
laboeatot’y analyses and costs, Mark-up
is allowed nrsly on
subcontracted
items,
6:
Pleaserrferio
Appendix
A,
Pun 4
for abreakdowss
oftravrl policy
and costs. Travel linac ior this
section includes
soaal
costs
for
a two-man crew consisting ofa StatfEngissees and
a
Technician
31
ACTIVITY
10:
OPERATION
MONITORING, &
PERFORMAINJCE
This
subsection
will
be
used at
sites after
the
installation and successfUl
start-up
of the remediation
system.
Please
note
that this
subsectIon
allpys
both
Groundwater MonItoring ~ndOperation
and
Maintenance to
be submitted
as
a sIngle activity at sites
with an operating remediation system. This
subsection
should
also
be
used
for
the
costs
for
a
rented/leased
remediation
system
or
any
rented/leased capital component(s) of the remediation systeip. lithe rental/lease agreement contains
costs for the maintenance of systems or
components, duplicate
costs for the maintenance of those
systems/components
are
not
reimbursable.
Rentavlease
agreerpents
must
be
included with
the
workplan
and
cost proposal submitted for this Activity to
be considered for preapproval. The timing
ofthe
annual OMÔ~P
cycle
at a
site will depend on the date of successful
start-up of the
remediation
system
installed in Acflvity 09.
Please note
that some portions of the
OM&P process may require the participation of a Registered
Professional
Engineer.
Please
refer
to
30
IAC
§334.308(gJ(21)
for
informatIon
on
when
this
particIpation is
necessary.
J
WORKSHEET FOR OPERATION, MONITORING, AND PERFORMANCE
Part
A: Personnel
Costs
-
See Note i
Section
1:
Fixed Ansssaal Otike Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
OMP Plan fsr
Exialang Sytsems
-
See Note 2
Preparation
and Sulsnnilsal
$500.00
5
Principal Engineer (P3)
Oversight,
Regslaioey Interaction
$110.00
4
$440.00
Project
Manager (PM)
Management,
Plaiusing.
Data Review
580.00
12
$960.00
OMecP
Report
PrcparationandSubmission
$t,295.0O
t
$1295.00
Workplan
and
Coat Proposal
Preparation
and Submission
$115.00
I
$15.00
Total,
Section
Section 2:
Quarterly Monitoring
Personnel Costa
Subsection
2A:
First Quarler
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/W4ITS
TOTAL
SiaffEngineer/Geologisi (SE)
rield
Prep, Oata Fona.aninig
$70.00
I
$70.00
Tectmician Ill
(T3)
Purge toed Satnple Welts, First 25’
$40.00/Wel
Technician ill (T3)
,_Purge
and
Sample Wells,
Each Additional
25’ (Max 75’)
$10.00/Additional 25’/’st/elI
Total,
Subsection 1A
Subsection 28:
Second Quarler
32
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
StaffEngineer/Geologist (SF)
Field Prep,
Data Formatting
$70.00
I
$70.00
Technician
III (13)
Purge and
Sample
Wells, First 25’
$40.00/Well
Technician Ill (T3)
Purge and Sample Welts,
Each
Addutiorsal 25’ (Max 75’)
$10.00/Additional 25’P?/eli
Total, Subsection 28
Subsection
2C: Third
Quaeler
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Staff Engineer/Geologist (SF)
Field Prep.
Data Formatting
$70.00
I
$70.00
Technician
III (T3)
Purge and Sample
Wells,
First
25’
$40.00/Well
Technician
III (13)
Purge and Sample
WelIt,
Each Additional
25’ (Max
75)
$10.00/Additional 25’AVelt
Total, Subteceion
2C
Subsection
2D:
Fourth
Quarier
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Staff
Engineer/Geologist (SF)
Field
Prep,
Data Formatting
$70.00
I
-
$70.00
Tecleasician Ill
(T3)
Purge and Sample Welts, First 25’
540.00/Well
Technician III
(T3)
Purge and Sample Wells,
Each Additional
25’ (Max
75’)
$10 00/Additional 25/Well
Total,
Subsection 2D
Total, Section
2
Section):
Operation and
Monitoting Personnel Cotta
for
the
Remeduation
System, Per Site Visit
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/lfi’4ITS
TOTAL
Technician
III (T))
O&M,
Itt System, Up
To
3 Wells
$75.00
I
$75.00
Technician Ill
(T3)
08cM, Air Emissions
ConlTol
$25.00 Each
Device
Technician
III (13)
08cM,
Each Additional
System, Up To) Wells
$37.50
Technician Ill (T3)
08cM,
Each Additiottat Well Per System Over), All
Syttettta
$12.50/Welt
Staff Engineer (SF)
Field
Prep, Data
Forinratsing
$70.00
.5
$35.00
Sea/f Engineer (SF)
Field
Prep,
Data Fomsatting,
Each Additional) System
Wells
$7000
.5
$35.00
Subtotal,
Seeaioa
3
Number
of Site
Viaita
Total, Section 3
TOTAL, PART
A
Part B: Equipment Costs- See Note 3
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Syseene/Componerse Rerstatltease Costa
-
See
Note4
Oiaposable
bailers
$a,00AveIl
Small items
for Groundwater Moniooring
$20.00/Evens
4
$8000
Cathon
Caniauers,
includes insuallalion,
recycling,
and/or diapoaal
$750.00
33
Eleceeical Service
12
Nartural
Gas Serince
.
12
Waler/Waseewater Service
12
Telecommunications (for
off-ssle syseein monitoring)
12
(Other)
(Other)
Small itema for Syatem
Maintenance
$50.00/MonttilSyslem
12
Subtotal, Part 81
50
or
55
Mark-up
.
TOTAL. PAI4TB
Part C:
Analytical Costs
-
See Note 3
Section
5:
Gtoundwaere Testing
ANALYTICAL TEST
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
IPWBTEX
$111.50
-
TPH/BTEX
wi
MTBE
$ 1)4.00
lOS
$15.00
PAIl (610)
$158.00
PAH (8270)
$249.00
Shipping
$S.00/Saanple
(OTHER)
Subtotal,
Section
I
tO
Mark-up
Tstal.
Section
I
Section
2
System Prei’oumance Analytical Testing
ANALYTICALTEST
UNITCOST
UNITS
TOTAL
TPH
(Water)
$49.00
UTEX (Water, Air)
$62.50
BTEX
w/
MTBE (Water)
$85.00
TOTAL LEAD (Water)
$31.00
Shipping
$5.00/Sample
(OTHER)
(OTHER)
.
Subtotal,
Section
2
10
Mark-up
Total,
SectIon 2
TOTAL,
PART C
34
Part
0:
Waste Management
Costs
-
See Note
5
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Vacuum Truck
$75.00fflour
Fluud
Oiaposal
$0.40/Gallon
Subchapter
H
Discharge or Alurmaee
Ditpoaal
Method (Describe m Work Plan.)
As Needed
Subtotal
10
Mark-op
TOTAL, PART 0
Part
E:
Travel
Costs
-
See Note
6
ITEM
UNIT
COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Equipment Truck
$140.00/day
Mileage (over
IOU mules, round vip)
$0.) I/mile
Travel lime
550.OOThour
Per Diem
$g0.00/day
Air Fare
Dy
Need
TOTAL, PART £
TOTAL
ACTIVITY COSTS, PARTS
A-E
Noten
1;
Please refer to
Appendix A
Pan I
foe a
breakdown ofpresoisnel coals.
2:
An OMP
Plan
for exineingsystems
should
be submitted
for any nile
where a remediation
system was in
operation at lire time
the
syaeem
peefonnaaiee
reporting requirements were
adopted by
the TNRCC.
3: Please refer to
Appendix A,
Part
5 for
a
listing of equipment
costs. Maalt-up for subconuacsed
costs vary. Rein
en Appendix
A:
Pan 9.
4:
Thin line will
be used
ifa remediation
system
oraoomponent(s)oltlieremediation will
berrimburscd
in thiaActivity.
SeeActiviayo9:
Reunediation
System Installation
5:
PleaseTrier to
Appendix
A,
Pass
2 foe additional laboratory
analyaes
and
coats.
Mails-sap is allowed
only on sssbconuaceed items.
6: Please refer
to Appendix
A. Part? for
a
breakdown
ofwnsre management
coals.
7:
Plrase ccitt io AppendixA.
Pan
4 foe a
btealsdowi’a
ofuavel policy
and
costs.
TheTNRCC
willpay
for one
Tcehaiicuan
so
uavel so the silt ad
perfomn
O&M and Orotasdwanee Sampling
evenss.
The
TNRCC wnll eeuobssese dent
sndetsdual
as the
T3
ease
whets08cM ta performed and at the TI rate when sannptuog
is
performed. Teatel wull
he paid
at the T3
rate.
35
ACTIVITY
11:
SITE
CLOSURE
This
subsection will
be
used after
a Site Closure
Request
has been reviewed and
approved
by
the
TNRCC.
WORKSHEET FOR SITE CLOSURE
Part A:
Personnel Costs
-
See Note I
Section
I. Office Costa
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT COST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Site
Closure
Request
Peepasation
and
Ssubmisaion
$275.00
I
5275 00
Project
Manager
(PM)
Management and Overnight
$80.00
2
$160.00
Final
Closure Report
Preparation and
Submission
$193.00
I
$195.00
Workplan
and Cost
Propoaal
Peeparstion and
Stbmiaaion
$115.00
I
$115.00
Tota’
Section I
5745.00
2: Eseld
peeeonssel Costs
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNITCOST
HOURS/UNITS
TOTAL
Technictan 11(12)
Plug Firetwell
$135.00
I
51)5.00
Technuciaor
11(12)
Plug Additional
Well, 100’
Deep
590.00
Technician
11(12)
Plug
Additional Wtll, ~lO0’ Deep
51)5.00
Rernsediaoon System
Removal.
Sec Noee
2
Remove
and dispose ofsystetn capital components
$500.00
TeeM
Section 2
TOTAL, PART A
Part B: Rig Costs
-
See Note
3
.
ITEM
ACTIVITY
UNIT
COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Mobilization
(tens than
SO milcs)
Tranipon Rig
&
Crew Co Site
$245.00
S
$245.00
clsleage (tier
50. mai 450)
Additional
Mileage
to Site.
Round Trip
$2.50
Plug &
Abandon
Wells
P&A
futit 25’,
per well
5)00.00
Plug
and
Abandon
Wells
P&A
additional footage. 26~
to
IOU’.
per foot
per- well
$5.00
Plug
and
Abandon SS/rlla
PitA
additional footage, 100’,
pee
foot
per well
$10.00
DrillCtew
Pee Diem
OvemigleeSsay
$190.00
Subtotal, Part
B
15
Mark.aap
TOTAL, PART
B
36
Part C:
Other Costs
-
See Note 3
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS
TOTAL
Diapoaal ofWante
Molenal
$250.00
+
$10.50/CY
Small Isema
$20.00/Site/Day
(Other)
(Other)
(Other)
Subtotal, Part C
55
Mark-up
TOTAL.
PART C
Part
D: Tnvd Costs
-
See
Note 4
ITEM
UNIT COST
UNITS/HOURS
TOTAL
Eqiaupmens Truck
$140.00/Day
Mileage (over
tOO, Roond Trip)
$0.) I
.
Travel Time
$45.00
Pee
Diem
$gO.00
Asrfare
By Need
t
TOTAL, PART
D
TOTAL ACTIVITY COSTS,
PARTS
A-fl!
Notes:
I:
Please refer to Appendix
A,
Port
I
foe
a breakdown of persotsnel costs.
2:
Capital
equipment coma/Its of the major
individual
components of the remediation
system including pumps, compressors,
aeration nyu, ntsippin
towers,
oil/water aeparstoms,
catox units,
etc. It
doea not
include wsnng, tubing,
pepeng, etc.
Every effort should be made
so ettuse
ftuncssonutl componensa
of
a samedsatson ayssem
at other sites to conteotCo
3:
Matlc.sup is allowed for aubcooteacted
costs only. Costs
for plugging
ansi abandoning
wells includes resurfacing
the well
pointa. Waste
material includes well
casing,
concrete, surface
completions,
compound
fencing,
eec,
4:
Please safer to Appendi’s
A,
Pan
4 fot a
breakdown ofiravel
policy
and coals.
37
APPENDIX A
COSTS
38
PART
1:
PROFESSIONAL
PERSONNEL/LABOR RATES
PERSONNEL TITLE
MAXIMUM RATE/HOUR
Principal
(PR)
$110.00
Principal £ngineer!Geologist/J-iydrogeologist
Ill
(P3)
$110.00
Senior Engineer/Geologist/llydrogeologist II (P2)
$95.00
Associate Engineer/Geologist/l-lydrogeologist
1 (P1)
$85.00
Project Manager (PM)
$80.00
Stati Engineer/Geologist’Hydrogeologist(SF)
$70.00
Field EngineeriGeologist/Uyclrogeologist (Fl))
$65.00
Environmental Scientist (ES)
$70.00
Health
Scientist (US)
$80.00
Technician UI (T3)
$50.00
Technician II (12)
$45.00
Technician I(TI)
$40.00
Drafisperson
11(02)
$50.00
Dratisperson 1(1)1)
$45.00
Word Perrcessor(WP)
$35.00
Clerical (CL)
$30.00
Notes:
I:
The
Personnel Titles
in
this table
correspond
with
the Personnel
Qualifications andTask Descriptions
in the table immediately
following.
2:
Personnel Costs
for office staffinckades the cost ofthe equipment they
notmally use to complete their tasks.
Separate costs for computers (including CADI)
machenes), office supplies, etc. are not reimbursable.
3:
Reimbursement is based on themaximum rate ofthe corrective action task beingperformed,,not the rate of)he ind,i\i4ual perfonnipg the task. ~or
Instance,
an rmdrvrdual at the level ofa Techntcaan I (TI) or h~gher
is
required to
perform normal monatonng well sampling activities
but there is
no injunction
against
a
Senior Engineer (P2) performing this task. The maximum reimbursable rate
for this task, regardless of who us actually perf6rming the work, however, is at the
rate of a TI, which is 340.00/hour. (In other words, any individual with minimum
qualificationsor
higher
may perfoem a given corrective action task, but
relmburser-nent wall be based on the
hourly or unit rate br thetask, not the pay rate ofthe andwsdual performing
It.)
4:
Mark-up for professional personnel employed by the
RCAS
is not allowed. Ifthe RCAS does not have an
individual with
the qualificationsnecessary to
perform a task We RCAS may subcontract out for this service. Rermbursable costs for these undivrduals will be cost plus
10.
39
PERSONNEL
QUALIFICATIONS
AND
TASK
DESCRIPTIONS
The
following qualifications
and
task descriptions are
for those
personnel who will
be
involved
in
activitIes for which preapproval
IS
required.
PERSONNEL AND QUALIFICATIONS
TASK DESCRIPTION
Principal
(PR)
.
.
.
.
.
Adm~nistrative
and\or professiopai head of the orpnization.
Responsible
for
conceiving
and executing
plans and
functions of the organizatIon. Directs the professional
staff. Normally has a financial
interest in
the company as
partial owner, major
investor
or majontockholder. Charges an extremely limited number ofhours per
site as the
Principal. Thu position shoufd never bill
field hours.
-
Expert
testimony
.
Legal
slialegres
Depositions
-
Organizational oversight
Principal Engineer/Geologist/Uydrogeolo2ist
111(93)
.
.
A
Principal must
be professionally registere~wheet
applicable, be
in compliance with
Subchapter
J
rules, have
an advanced
engineering or science degree
and at least ten years experIence
in conductrn
corrective action.
Administrative
and/or professional head
of’an organizauon
with
authority and responsubi try for
conceiving
and
executingplans and functions of the orgpnization and directing a prolessional stall.
Charges a very
limited
number ot
hours per site,
as in review ot
the project documents. A Principal should almost never bitt field work.
-
Expert
testimony
-
Program management
-
Project oversight
.
Depositions
-
Reviews most complex sites
.
Develops or advances new
technology
innovations
Senior EagineerlGeologistfliydrogeologist II (P2)
.
.
.
Typically requires an advanced
degree
Requires protessional registration when
applicable,
8
yearsofexpenence
in
technical or managerial roles, and compliance with Subchapter I Serves
as senior technical leader for
.
environmental
remetjration
projects of medium
to
large scope
and/or complexity and has developed substantial
expertise in the fretd of practice. May supervise or direct
the work açtrvitres of rower
eyel
professionals and
technicians. Will
perform very
limited held work, and have
limited involvement
in projects. Duties typically
include revIewing reports, developtn
stratç
res,and attending client and/qr Agency meetings. Responsible
for
approving designs,
reports
plans, an
speci
cations before submittal to
clients or regulatory agencies.
If
srgnrt’icantly
involved
in
a’hrghly
technrcal
project, should have substantial
technrcar expertise directly related to
the project.
.
Program management
-
Projectoversigttt
-
Project managemçnt
-
.
Aquiter characterization
.
Reviews technical repels
-Reviews
RAPs
.
Data review and analysis
.
Prepares proposals
Assçciate Erigirteer/Geologist/Nydrogeologist
(Fl)
.
.
Typically requires a Bachelor’s degre in en
inetnng
geology
hy~ogeology.
or related science and professional
registration when applicable. Complies with
ubchap(er .1, anc~
has
to 7
years of experience or an advanced
degree
and more than 4 years ofexperience.
Leads
and supervises
teams oflower
level personnel
but
would
have
a
muted
number of hours charged
to each srte, and only a small
percentage oftotal
field hours, denerally
supervises Project Maqagers and oversees severatproiects.
May prepare prpposals. Under general direction,
prepares environmental
programs
and ptaris specitications for site remedration activity.
.
Project management
.
Engi~eennglremediat,
equipment design
-
Aquiter characterization
-
Review technical reports
.
Review
emedral action plans
-
Data review & analysis
-
Report preparation
Prepare proposals
Site inspection (occasional)
Projec( Manager (PM)
.
.
.
.
Typically possesses
a bachelor ofscience degree
in
ee~grneerrng,
geology, hydrogeology, or a directly related field.
Serves as manager for
entire projects. Complies with
Subchapfer
3 ancfluas ‘at least three years of experjence in
the
environmental
treld. Under general supervison,,prepares
environmental
programs
and plans specifications for site
remedial activities
Is responsible for gathermng
treld data and
is competent at data analysts.
Serves as on-site
technical expert and may do
hydrological
site
characterizations, supervise
hydrautrc tests, and write sections of
reports.
.
Project management
.
Dafa review and analysis
.
Report preparation
-
Repostreview
.
Engtqeenng/equipmentdesign
.
On-site supervision
-
‘Workplan preparation
Site assessment planning
-
Field work planning
Site inspection (peripdicL
-
Obtarns
permission tor ott-site access
Staff Engineer/Geologistlflydrogeologist
(SF)
-
Requires a bachelor’s degree
rn engineering, georogy,
hydrpgeology, or related scrence and one to three years of
experience in
the envieonmental
freid.
Works
under supervision to
perform routine tasks
related to
enyironmental
remediatron system design and aquifer testtng. Must be able to conduct assessment and reme4ial activities
including drilling and monitoring
well installation
samplrng, and compilrngdata. Must have
knowled
e of
QAJQC procedures
and protocorT This
position wril norrnalry be highest
in The number ofhours brlled
o
field
work.
-
Report preparation
.
Field work preparatuoSplanning
-
Supervises she assessment activities and overexcavaoon
-
Site reçonnaissançe an4 mapping
-
Remedial system
installation
-
Limited data review and analysts
-
Obtains permission
for off-sue access
Monttortng activities
£r.v.iropment~IScientist (ES).
.
.
.
.
.
typically requires a degree
tn biology
chemistry, mtcrobiology, or related environmental
science degree and
2-6
years of related expenence.
An rndrviduai
with
an adv~nced
d~gree
should have
2
years
of
related experience.
Performs
assignments
related
to
site
assessments and broremediation projects,
risk analysis methodologies, and
analytical
data
reduction.
-
Data review and analysis
-
Brorentediation,feasibtlrty
stuØies
.
Report preparation and overview
-
Reppmt revresv
-
Onsite supervision
-
Site assessment planning
Health Scientist (US)
.
.
.
.
,
Typically requires a degree
in
Industrial Hygiene, Toxicology,ora
related health science degree, and requires 1.3
years of retatedexperrence. Ensures compliance with of field service operations with
051-LA safety
standards.
Addresses public
health concems.
-
Health
and safety
coordinator
-
Develops
sitesatety
plan
-
Periodically oversees health and safety
monitoring
Field Entineer/.Geologist/Hydrozeologist (FL)).
.
Entry
revel position requrnng a degree
in engineenng, geology
hydrogeolo.gy, or related science and less
than a
year ofexpenence. Under close supervision
performs routine held tasks related to environmental
projects
including drilling and monitoring ~veltinstallation, sampling,
site layout and geologic mapping,
wrmiing field
notes, and basic analysis.
-
Field wo* preparation
.
.Asstst in
site
assessmentactivitres
-
Srte reconnaissance
&
mapping
-
Remedial system
installation
-
Ltmifed data review and analysis
Monitoring and sampling
-
Supervise overexcavatton
40
Technician tIl
(T3~
.
.
-
-
-
Typically
requires a high
school diploma,
certified or licensed trades-person, or an Associates degçee.
Requires
more than
4 years of exper~cnce.
in the.emtvironmerttal field. Responsible for general
sMpervision ol the installation,
maintenance, and repair ot
on-site equipment.
Collects
samples and maintains
operating
logs.
-
Field workpreparation
-
-
Operation &
maintenance ofequipment
-
Wçll devetppment &
sampling
-
Soil Sampling
-
Waste handling
-
-
-
Remedial
system
installation
-
Limited contractor supervision
-
tree product
(PSI-I) removal
-
Monitoring
Technician
11(12)
-
.
.
.
-
.
TypicaJly requires a high
school diploma. Requires 2to4
years ofon-the-job training.
Under appropriate
supen’isrpn, performs routine labor tasks associated with on-sitc installation, maintenance,
and repair of
reniediationequipment.
Bails welts and collects soil and groundwater samples.
-
Field
workprep~ration
-
Operation
&
maintenance ofequipment
-
wglI development
&
sampling
-
Soil Sampling
-
Waste handling
-
NH removal
-
Monitoring
Technician I (TI)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Typically requires a high
school diploma.
Entry level positron
under
close supervtsron. Performs routine labor
associated with
system
installation,
mainlenance and repair of’machineiy, monitoring, and sampling,
-
Qpe~ationand maintenance of equipment
-
well development
and sampling
-
Soil sampling
-
P51-I removal
-
Monrtonng
Dra.ftsr,erson
II (D~)
-
.
-
Typically requires a high school
diojoma.
Requires 4
to8 yearsofexperience ottwo yearsofrelated college
and
more than one,year ofexperience. tienerallyrequrres a Technical Drawing Certificate, and advanced drafting
skills such as 1_omputem
Aided Drafting
(&.
Design) operations.
-
Advanced drafting
-
QAD/CADD work
-
cartography
Draftsperson
.1
(Dl)
-
.
-
-
-
Typically requires a high
school dip~oqia
w!ilu up io4
years. ~fex
rj~nce.
Generally requires a Technical
-
Drawing Certificate and some familiarity with
Computer Aided
ralting. Performs entry
to
mid-revel drafting
such as minor
edits to
existing CAD or board drawings.
-
Mid-level drafting
-CAD editing
.
Word Processor(WP)
.
.
-
-
-
Operates computer
for
word processing,
spreadsheets,
and statistical typing, correspondence
report generation, etc
Higher billing rates
imply experienced, eflicieni work.
-
Spreadsheets
-
-
Report generation
-
Word
processing
Cteric*l
(EL)
.
.
Cienerai
ottrce
work, typing, and filing.
-
lyping
-
Filing
-
-
General secretarial
-
-
Document reproduction
TestlMethod
PART 2:
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
COSTS
Standard
Rush
Rate
-
Rate
TestlMethod
I
Standard
Rush
Rate
Rate
I
41
Tnt-
EPA
418,1
Soil
Waler
Ac
aTEX-
EPA
sozia
Soil
Waler
Air
8
RCRA
Metals-EPA
1131
Soil
Total
Oraamaic Halogens-
TOX
EPA
9028
Soil
Volatile Oreanic
Compounds- VOC,
EPA
8260W
Soil
Waler
5
150.00
aTEXwfMTBE-
EPA
80218
Soil
Water
PAR
Soil
-
EPA
8100
Water-
EPA 610
PAR
-
Soil
-
EPA
8270
Water
-
EPA
625/8270
Total Diajoived
Solida- EPA
160.1
Water
Soil
Parameters-
tree Note 1)
Carbon
Waler
-
EPA
4151/9060
Chlorides- EPA
325,3
SoilAvaimr
Molatiare-
ASTM D-2216
Soil
$98.00
n/a
$47.50
$49.00
$47.50
$62.50
$62.50
$62.50
$80.00
585,00
$148.00
$158.00
$222.00
$249.00
$85.00
$300.00
340.00
$32.00
$18.00
$12.00
$24.00
Serni-V,O.C,s- EPA
8270
Soil
Waste
$71.25
$73.50
$71.25
$93.75
$93.75
$93
75
$120.00
$12750
$222 00
$23700
$333.00
$373.50
$22.50
is/a
$60 00
$48.00
$27.00
$18.00
$36.00
TçLP
flensene-
EPA
1311
w/
8020
Soil
Total
Lead-
EPA
7420
Soil
Water
TCLP
Lead-
EPA
1311
w/
1420
Soil
sialrates-
EPA
375.4
Waler
Reactivity.
Corrosivity,
lgnltabiiity (RCI)
Notes:
$220.00
$220.00
$295
00
$295.00
$152.00
$31.00
$3100
$93.00
$35.00
$10.00
$24.00
$24.00
$1650.00/day
$330.00
$330.00
$570.00
$570.00
n/a
$46.50
$46.50
n/a
is/a
$15.00
$36.00
$36.00
Iron
(Fe)- EPA
200.7
Water
Nitrates-
EPA
353.2
Water
Phosphates- EPA
365,2
Waite
Mobile Laboratory
I:
The above prices include all
charges associated with
lab analysis including
but not limited to preparation and disposal,
2:
Includes
Total
Organic Carbon, Porosity,
Intrinsic Permeability,
Bulk
Density, and Volumetric Water Content,
3:
Justification for anythin
other than the Standard Rate should
be included in the work plan andl or the reimbursement application. The Standard Rate is
for a tumaround
time
greater than
48
hours,
Rus
Rate
is
for
a
tumaround time ofless
than 48
hours. If an analytical
test cannot
be completed
inless
than
48
hours, Rush
Rate will
not
be allowed.
4:
Allowable shipping costs
ate $5.00
per
sample container (or sample set in the case of BTEXIV.O.C.
samples), regardless of the method ofdeliveiy. Labor for the
collection
samples is
included in site
personnel costs.
5:
A
mobile
laboratory
is expected
to conduct
I 8-201PH/BTEX
analyses
on soils each day or 15-18 TPI-IIBT
X water/soil analyses
each day.
For sites
where a small
numbe
pfsaniples will need
to
be an~lyzed,
jhe TNRCC may allow
i/~
~f one day ofuse for the mobile laboratory (at
825.00)
if
this
is ~e
most cost-effective option. Mob/Demob costs
br a mobile lab
are $145.00 br the tirst 50
miles
(or less) plus $1.90/mile
for
each additional mile
up to a total ot
45u
additional
miles.
6:
Method
80288
replaces Method 8020.
Method 82608
replaces Method
8240.
42
PART 3:
DRILLING
WELL INSTALLATION, AND
DIRECT PUSh
TECHNOLOGY COSTS
The following
costs are
for various drilling activities.
Please note
that the costs are set up
so that any
boring or monitoring well that is
twenty-five
deep or
less
will
be reImbursed
at
a lump sum
rate.
Costs
after the first
twenty-five
feet should
be calculated on
a per-foot (beyond twenty-five feet)
basis,
Boring cost~
include decon, coring,
plugging, 4nd
Water Well Report generation costs. Monitoring
well installation costs include drilling, decon, coring, all well materIals, surface completion,
cap, jock,
and Water Well
Report Generation.
SECTION A:
CONVENTIONAL DRILLING
-
See Notes
Sand/Silt/Clay with Hollow-Stem Augers and Continuous Sampling
Depth
Interval
Boring
2”
Well
4” Well
6”
Well
Lunsp Son,
LuznpSwsi
Lump Sam
Lamp Sian
0’
to
25’
$775.00
$1,025.00
$l,i87.50
51,915,00
Per Additional Foot
Pt,
Additional
Foot
Per
Additional
Foot
Per
Additional root
26’ to
50’
$25.00
$43.50
$54.00
$76.00
Silo
00’
$43.00
$51.50
561.50
$76.00
800’
$61.sO
$54.00
$80.00
$88.00
Limestone/Hard
Rock using Air or Mud Rotary, Surface Sampling Only
Depth Interval
Boring
2” Well
4”
Well
6” Well
Lump
Sum
LuasspSusn
Lump Sum
Lamp Siam
0’
Ia
25’
$1,025 00
$i,275.00
$1,450.00
$I,9$0.00
Per
Additional
Foot
Per Additional
Foot
Per
Additional
Foot
Per
Additional Foot
26’ to
50’
$42 00
346.00
359.00
$78
00
5?’
to
00’
$48.00
$53.00
$62.00
$79.00
iou’
$61.00
$63.00
$70.00
$89.00
Limestone/Hard
Rock
using Air Coring and Continuous Sampling
Depth Interval
Boring
LtanpSuiss
2” Well
LumpSum
4” Well
LompSum
6” Well
Lump Soot
O’ioS’
$1078.00
$1562.50
$1,825.00
$2,075.00
Pee
Additional
Foot
Per Additional
Foot
PerAdditional
Fool
Per Additional Foot
26’ to
50’
,
$38.50
$57.50
$7200
$8150
Silo
500’
$44.00
$65.00
$79.00
$96.00
2’
100’
$53.00
$76.00
$92.00
$1 18.00
Completion
Footage Rates Expected
in
a Standard (10-Hour) Work Day
43
Borings
Monitoring Wells
Sand’SililCtay
using
HSAa, Continuous Saxnpting
143
t II
Limestone’Rard Rock
w/ Air/Mud
Rotary, Surface Sampling
215
tl7
Linsestoneklard
Rock
w/ Air Coriteg, Continuous
Sampiesg
ISO
(85
MobilizationlDemobilization and Per Diem
Mob/Demob
50
Mile,
$245.00 Lump
Sum
Mob/Demnob
50
Miles
S2.50/MiIe50
Miles one-way (max 450 additional
miles)
Drill
Crew (3
Peruon) Per Diem
$ I90.00
SECTION 8: DIRECT PUSH TECHNOLOGY
Day Rate
for
a Direct Push Unit
$ 1480/Day
See Note 4
Pee
Foot Charge
$i2,50/Foot
Expected Footage
per Standard (10-hoar) Day
195
Feet/Day
Additional
aniount’foot
for
I’
well contpletaon
$12.50
Mobilization/Demobilization
and
Pet-
Diem
Mob,Demob
50
Miles
$845.00 Lump
Sum
MobsDemob 50
Miles
St .9O/Mile
50
Miles rime-way (max
450 additional miles)
3,111
Crest (2 Person) Pet Diem
$130.00
Notsa:
I: At
aome ,iles, the
need may
arise for the installation ofa
well that isolates an upper iaiuraled zone in order to defme lie
contaminantplume
in a lower saturate4
zone. When
the seed for such a
dual-cased
well
is agseed upon
between lie
owssee/openatoe and the ‘t’NRCC,
the woakplass and cost proposal submitted to
Ott ThRCC
for preapp,oval
should contam three bsds foe
the installation of these wells.
Sabmitled
coals will
be
reviewed
on
a
case-by-case
bat,s.
3: tnsituations where a
low total footage ofborings are to
be installed
oe a second
day ofutilizationofdieecs
push eechsology is
required, the per footchaegewill
be used,
no580 exceed the day
rate.
3:
Per Diem
requirements fordrill crew,
is
described in the
“Travel” section ofthis
Appendix.
4:
For
sues
where the
(ootage oIdirere ufdirertpuuh borings
needing lobe installed is
small, the
1’NRCC
may
allow in ofune
day for Direct Push
Unit rental (at $740.00/day),
plus $12.50
per foot
after the
Oral 98
feet have
bees installed.
44
PART 4:
TRAVEL COSTS
Travel
By
Air
vs. Travel by Surface Vehicle
The
TNRCC will reimburse
for 500 miles round-trip mileage plus 10
hours oftravel time or round-trip
coach
au-fqreplus
I
A
hours
oftravel
time per site visit
whichever is
smaller. Personnel rates allowed
for
travel time
will be determined by
the field personnel required to complete the activity as described
in
the
cost
guidelines
for
each
activity.
The
number
ot
personnel
allowed
for travel will
also
be
determined
by
the number
of
field personnel
in the cost guidelines.
Travel
costs
will only be paid from the
closest office of the
RCAS
to the
site.
Mileage rates
will
be tied
to
the applicable Internal Revenue Service rate
for
mileage, rounded
to
the
next highest
cent.
As of
November
1,
1996,
that rate
is 31
cents per mile.
To simpli~’
the preapproval process,
a flat rate of$ 140.00 per day will
be allowed for the
use of an
“equipment truck”. This
can
be
any
vehicle, of
any
size, either company owned or rented. This vehicle
comes with all of
the
equipment normally used by the operator for
tield
work, and may include purgin
and
sarn_pling
gear (including
pumps
and
generators), coolers, environmental monitoring devices
an
tools.
I he only equipment
not
included
in
the day
rate for this truck are disposables
such
as
I’PE,
bailers,
visqueen,
ice7 cameras,
film,
etc. These
disposab!es are costed out on
a,.per well,
per cubic
yard,
or per day
basis,
as
appropriate
to the
specific
activity.
included in
the
fl4000
cost of the
equipment truck
is the first 100
mies of travel.
It
a
vehicle
is going to
be utilized to conduct work on
more
than one
site
on
a given day, the operator must
split
travel time between the sites,
or lump’ all
travel costs on
a single
site.
Per Diem
and Non-reimbursable Costs
Per diem (meals
and lodging)
will be paid for site activities requiring more than one day of field work
and
occurring atasite greater than 90 miles (one
way) from the closest office of the
RCAS. The
per
dIiTh will
be a maximum of $80.00 or actual cost, whichever
is
lower, per individual required for the
activity. Al) receipts for lodging and
food must be submitted with the reimbursement
application for
per
diem to be reimbursed.
per diem for drill crews will
be $1 90.~00for a~
standard three-per•son crçw
ljotary
ng)
or
$130.00 for
a two-person direct push crew. Lodgtqg receipts must be submuted with
the drilling
invoice(s) for drill crew per diem to
be reimbursed.
Uther travel costs for drill rigs
and
crews
are
discussed
in the “Drilling and
Well Installation” unit costs in this Appendix.
The following travel expenses
are not reimbursable:
•
Personal trips;
•
Overtime;
•
Entertainment;
and
-
•
Travel for any purpose not
directly related to the
performance of necessary corrective action.
45
PART
5:
EQUIPMENT AND
SUPPLY COSTS
The following tables contain maximum
reimbursable costs for a variety of large and small equipment,
along with commonly used supplies. The total reimbursable cost for leased/rented equipment will not
exceed the
normal retail
price for that piece of equipment,
plus mark-up.
~~quipment(Smali)
Daily
Absorbent Boonas
Weekly
Monthly
Purchase
4’)(36”-each
$5_Do
6’X
0”
each
$3000
a’ X
50’. tact,
MOOD
Aeration Trays.
See Not.
I
5000.00
52,400.00
Air Compressors& Generators
AC’ 3/4
Horsepower
$1500
$70.00
$200.00
AC-2
Hoe,epower
$20.00
515.00
$250.00
AC-SHorsepower
$25.00
$100.00
5300,00
$7,200.01)
AC-
ISO CEM
& Paving
Breaker (Jackhammer)
$85.00
$325.00
$950.00
GEN-
400
Wan
$50.00
GEN.
2500
Wan
$75.00
Air
Strippers-
See
Note I
$15,250.00
Bailers
Baiier(Teflon or polypropylene, disposable)
58.00
Bailer (PVC,
dedicaredi
—
$15.00
Carbon
Absorbers, Drum Type-
See
Note I.
(Includes
installation,
recycling.
and/or
disposal.)
$750.00
Data
Collectors
Dalalogger
(2
channel)
$65.00
$325.00
Dasaiogger(8
channel)
555.00
5575.00
Pressure
Transducer
$35.00
$175.00
OVM
Meter (P71), PlO). See
Nose 2
Combustible
Gas Meter-
See
Note 2
pH, Conductivity,
Temperature Meter.
See Note 2
Dissolved O,ygcn
Meter.
See
Note
2
Oxygen,
Carbon Diocide, Methane Gas
Meter’
See
Note
2
Interface
Probe- Ste
Note
2
Field
Teat
Kits and’or Meters
for Water Alkalinity,
Redo,, Chloride,
iron,
Nibale,
Sulfate, Phosphate.
See Note
2
Concrete
$SS.OO/cy
46
Concrete
Saw
$50.00
$75.00
Fences
Compound Fence
(Wood/Chain)
$850.00
Chain
Linlt,
S/Foot
$3.50
$9.00
TemponssyConaeruttionBastier$flOOFett
$5.00
$8.00
$500.00
Hand
Auger,
Manual
$15.00
$60.00
Power
$45.00
$180.00
Jscklsamner(etectric)
$40.00
£150.00
$500.00
OiLAVater Separator, Gravity Type- See Note
j
$2,000.00
Panipa
Gas Powered, 2’ Diaseseece,
ISO
GPM
$50.00
$200.00
Pneumatic
$75.00
$225.00
$2,000.00
2’,
Electhc Submersible,
50
GPM
$4500
$180.00
See
Nose
I
4’, ElectS Submersible, 20 GPM
$50.00
$200.00
Ste
Note
I
Skimmers
Passive (I
Liter)
$10.00
$30.00
$350.00
Etecthc
$75.00
$265.00
$3,200.00
Holding
Tanks.
See
Note
I
55 Gallon
Bastel or Drum
$40.00
5,000 Gallon
525.00
575.00
$225.00
$700.00
5.000 Gallon
$35.00
$105.00
$315.00
$3,750.00
21,000GaJlon
$500.00
$300.00
$900.00
Stripping
‘Tswers- See Note I
—
$54,750.00
SVE
Pilot Te,tEqaipment
Blower,
5.5
Horsepower
$20.00
Blowee,
5
Horsepower
$35.00
Blowee,
IS
Horsepower
$50.00
Pressure
Gauges
$75.00
Caabon Canister (drum type)
$45.00
$500.00
SVE
Probc
$250.00
An SVE
Trailer w/all
neceasasy eqwpmenst
$500.00
Survey
Equipment
,
$30.00
$120.00
Traffic
Control Components
Barncades
$1.00
$400
$14.00
$85.00
Cones.IDel’sneators
(per 25)
$5.00
$20.00
$50.00
$115.00
47
Signs
$1.00
$3.00
$55.00
$35.00
Well Material,’
See MoteS
2’
PVC
Casing,
Schedule 40, Per Foot
$2.00
2’
PVC
Screen,
Schedule
40,
Per Foot
$4.00
2’ PVC ThncadeslCap
SS.OO
4’
PVC Casing,
Schedule
40, Per Foot
$4.00
4’ PVC
Screen,
Schedule 40, Per Foot
$8.00
4’ PVC
Threaded Cap
$9.00
FileerSasset
lUOLb. flag
ss.oo
Concrete.
Ready Mix. 90 Lb.
Bag
$3.50
Concrete,
PortlaodCement, 90 Lb.
Bag
$7.50
Sand
Cemessl Sltata’y Backfill w/
Deliveiy, Percy
$40.00
Beaslonite
Grout, 50Lb.
Bag
$23
00
Beneossite
Chipa, 50 Lb. Bag
$7.50
Bentonite
Tabiesa, 50 Lb. Bat
orBucket
$35.00
Miscellaneous
Small
items’ See Note
4
$20.00
Tedlar Bags
$7.50
Visqueen, 6 nail,
20’
X
500’
560.00
Equipment
(Large)
Hourly
Daily
Weekly
—
Baclehoes
(operated)-
See Note
S
Light’duay
(12.58’ digging depth)
($35/h,
rental
Sc
$4Oflsroperaeor)
$75.00
$493.00
$2,125.00
Medium.duly (15.20’ digging depth)
($504u’ rental
Sc
540,1w operator)
$90.00
$510.00
$2,300.00
Heavy-duty (17.21’ digging
depth)
($7Oflsr rental
Sc
$4005, operator)
$150.00
$67000
$2,650.00
Compactor, (operated)
Walk-behind
($20,lsr rental
Sc
$JOflu’ operator)
$50.00
$340.00
$1,500.00
Riding
($25/hr
rental
Sc
$30/hr operator)
$55.00
$365.00
$5,575.00
Loader, (operated)
Bobcat
($20/lar rental &
5404w operator)
$60.00
$42000
$1,900.00
Light-duty
(upto
500 hp)
($30/hr rental
Sc $diOflu
operator)
$70.00
$470.00
$2,050.00
Heavy-duly(greaterthaa,
loohp)
($50~brren5al&$.4oflsroperstor)
$90.00
$570.00
$2,350.00
Tracked
Eacavatora
(operated)
Light’duty (20.22’ digging depth)
($asfssrrensal &
$40/ha opesasor)
$525.00
$745.00
$2$75.O0
Mcdiuns4usy (24-26’ digging depth)
($100/Is-rental & $404sroperasor)
$140.00
$820.00
$3,500.00
Heavy’duty (26’digging
depth)
($1204u’rental
& $40/hropetator)
$160.00
$920.00
$3,400.00
Trsack,
48
Equipment Truck. See NoteS
$240.00
ID cy
Dump
(operated)
$50.00
Bill
actually
time
used.
14
cy Dump (operated)
$55.00
20cy
Dump
‘*/
bailer
(openated)
$60.00
Vscuusn
Truck
(operated)
$65.00
Notes:
I:
Equipment purchased
for the installation oft
remediation
system will
be
costed out
byquote
by the
RCAS
in the
lnteeian Corrective Action rIanfiCAr) (see Activity 02),
the Corrective Action
Plan
(,cAP)
(tee Activsty Os),
orthe wockplait and cotepeoposal
submitted foe
Remedial Syttena
tnseatlaeeon (see Acuvity 09).
meat quotes
must be included when these
documents axe submitted to the
.t’NR.LC.
Because
ofthe unigue nature oleach individual site,
and
the range ofequspmene
types
avsslable
in the
mduaby, the RCA)
should design the
remedsataon system with
both
efficiency
and cost
in mind. The
cost proposals br remedsalsots syatems
will be revaewed
on a caae-by’caae
basia.
2:
Thesasajotily
ofdasacollecsjondevicesareconsultastl,wnrd
and
will
be
included indsecoseoftheConsulsant’s EquipnseastTnsck,
which
is
reimbursed attherste
of$140.Ooperday, plus
mileage
over 100
miles
round top.
Please refer to
the lTrsvel”
uecBon m this Appendix.
3:
Wall mater
ass ate
includedfor reference. Theaesisbunsemest ofthe coat of installing monitoring wells is
done
055
a per’foot bssis,
in which
ttie
cost ofwell
naasndats
is included.
Please sties to the
“Dnllsng and
Direct
Push Tcclusulogy” section in
this Appendix.
4:
Small
items are those disposables nosanalty used
at an LPST
silt. They
would include string, gloves,
decoea
supplies,
and
distilled water.
Other
small itesns may
include
tape, pent,
paint,
ice, and
wanting tape.
5:
Costs
for heavy equipment are based
on
a
rental charge offtve
hours perday
and
fifteen
hours
per
week,
and an
operator
charge ofeight hours per
day
and forty
taoum
perweek.
6:
See Appendix A,
Pass 4: Travel Costs for a description ofthe
Equipment Truck
and
its
use.
49
PART 6:
EXCAVATION
BACKFILLNG,
AND
RESURFACIIf~G
COSTS
The following tables should
be
used
to
calcu,late all excavation and over-excavation costs
alpng with
the
replacement of excavated
soils
with
Imported fill,
compacting
that
fill, and
resur?’acing
areas
affected
by these activities.
Please
note that
all personnel costs, except for stock,pile sampling and
report generation,
have been built into these flat rates. Also
note that the disposal
of lmpacted soils
discovered during
a tank removal must be preapproved independent of tank removal activities.
ITEM
2”
ASPHALT
6”
CONCRETE
PER
CUBIC YARD
Remove
Pavement Over
Affected Area. per sq ft
2.50
4.00
Excavate Impacted Soils, percy
900
Import
Fill,
per cy
11.00
Compact Fill,
per
cy
9.00
Resurface
Affected
Area, per sq ft
3.50
5.50
Notes:
-
t:
lfconcrese
coveris greater than 6’,
please note
this fact on the
workplan and
coatproposal. A
TNRCC coordinator has
tine ability to adjust reimbursable
costs for site’specific circumstances,
2:
Imposted fill volume will be
calculated as
the rate
of
1.3 times
the in si/is
volume ofthe
excavated
soils.
3: Compaction coats include in-place density tests.
4:
On rare
occasions, shoring
may be
necesaaay to conduce excavationactivities. If you encounter such a situation, justification for
increaaesl cost must be
aubmined with
the woekplan
and
coss
proposal
50
PART 7:
SOILS AND
WASTEWATER
MANAGEMENT COSTS
This section should
be
used to determine the cost of loading, hauling, and disposing excavated soils
or
generated groundwater.
DISPOSAL
RESULTING
FRONt ANY SITE
ACTIVITY
MEDIA
METHOD
ALL SOILS
LOAD AND
HAUL
DISPOSE
IN
LANDFILL
$14.00/C’s’
I500PPM
1’PH: 545.Oo/CY;
c1500PPM 1’PH~$20
50/CY;SeeNote
1
‘5500 PPM
TPU
SOILS ONLY
ASPHALT RECYCLING
THERMAL
DESORPTION
BIOREMEDIATION
535.00/CY;
See Note 2
545.00/CY; See
Nose
2
$35.00/C?;
Ste
Nose
2
GROUNDWATER AND PSH
LOAD, HAUL, &
DISPOSE
ON’SITE
TREATMENT &
DISCHARGE
$75,00iBR
forTeuck
plus
$00.40/GAL
Disposal
See
Nose
3
Notes:
1:
Nosed
cnsns for landfill disposal are maximum custs.
The 1’NRCC will
reimburse actual
costs (landfill
receipts muss be
included with
the
Application for Reimbumemeut) plus altowsbie marie-up.
2:
The noted
alternative seciusologies
for soils
with 1500
PPM 1Pl-l are maximum reimbursable
coats bus do sot
include ~osdinRandhauling costs.
Where
ajapropnate,
onsite
use of these
technotoples
shouldbe considered to
avoid
toasting and
Isaulinag
costs
lfthe
owner/opemtordecislesto
ste
ihee
eeclmolog,es on toils wnth cIsDO TPU
when a
lets
expensive disposal option
is available, the
TNRCC
will rernsburse The rate ofthe
Icast expensive
opuaon
and
she
owsen/opeastor
wall absorb the remasnuig coals.
3:The TNRCC will nospsy
los she d/sposal of walerthat collects
in
an
excavation because thee excavation was
ianpeopeshj
beamed. Such waler
must be sampled, $ The
o-,nrtser/opeesior’s cost, so
detes,n.ne
fit
is
impacted and
special handling is
necesssey.
The cost oftesting and
subsequent
disposal ofgroundwaner recharging
nato tan excavation
is renrnbussable.
Once
the dctensi,nanon has
been made that,
specsal
hassdluig is eequetd,
the ovstser/operasor
should
selectthe
moss toss etfecsive method ofwasse dasposal. Foe
she ma)onty o(sstes
an
Texas, thismethod will be
the
use o(vacnum
trucks. In census
areas
ofthe stair
that
are isolated by
distance from
companies that provide this service, on-tile
Ieeas,nent
and dnacharge
may
be
appropnate. A coat companson should be
made
us the cost proposal
and
woeieplassand
these
roseswsll be
mevsewedon erase-by-case basis.
4:
Soils
etssrsstd during
Site Assessmensis should
be
drummed or covered and held onsise pending Thereceipt
ofansalylicat aesulls. If tansdfslt disposal is necsssaiy, Ike TNRCC will
pay
5-55.00/drism or
$45 00/
maximum diepoeat
cusrs.
Sce
Note I.
5!
PART
8:
REPORT GENERATION COSTS
This
section should
be
used to
determine the reimbursable
costs
for
all report forms
except Risk
Assessments and Corrective Action Plans,
REPORT FORM TYPE
PERSONNEL TYPE
RATE/HR
HOURS
TOTAL
RELEASE
DETERMSNATION REPORT.
Project
Manager (PM)
$80.00
2
$160.00
Word
Processor (WP)
$35.00
TOTAL
$19500
Ft~DACTIVITY REPORT (FAR)- SEMI-ANNUAL £511 RECOVERY,
£511 RECOVERY SYSTEM O&M
Associate
Engineer
(Pt)
$85.00
I
$85.00
SeaffEnginecr/Qeologise
(SF)
$70.00
2
$140.00
WP
$35.00
I
$35.00
TOTAL
5260,00
INTERIM
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (ICAP)
Principal
Engineer
(P3)
$110.00
I
$110.00
Pt
$85.00
3
5255.00
PM
$80.00
2
$160.00
SF
570.00
12
5840.00
Drafisperson
II (D2)
$50.00
5
5250.00
WP
$35.00
6
$21000
TOTAL
51,825,00
FAR-
PSU RECOVERY SYSTEM INSTALLATION
P3
.
I
$11000
5110.00
SF
8
$70.00
$560.00
D2
3
$50.00
$150.00
WP
I
$35.00
$35.00
TOTAL
$835.00
RISK ASSESSMENT UPDATE or FAR
-
SITE
ASSESSMENT
-
See
Note
PM
$80.00
I
$80.00
SF
570.00
4
$280.00
WP
$35.00
I
535.00
D2
$45.00
2
590.00
TOTAL
5485,00- 5cr
Nose I
FAR. REMEDIATION
SYSTEM INSTALLATION
(EXCEPT PSH RECOVERY SYSTEM)
52
Senior Engineer (P2)
$95.00
2
$19000
Pt
$85.00
4
5340.00
SF
$70.00
20
-
$1,400.00
WE
$35.00
2
570.00
02
550.00
6
5300.00
TOTAL
52,30000
FAR- CORRECTIVE
ACTION PLAN ADDENDUM
91
585.00
2
$570.00
WE
$35.00
I
$35.00
02
$50.00
2
$100.00
TOTAL
$30500
ANNUAL
REPORT- GROUNDWATER
MONITORING
ONLY
PM
$80.00
I
$80.00
SF
570.00
4
$280.00
WP
$35.00
I
$35 00
DI
$45.00
I
$4500
TOTAL
$44000
ANNUAL
REPORT- OPERATION, MONITORING, AND PERFORMANCE
P2
$95.00
2
$190.00
PM
$10.00
5
$400.00
SF
$70.00
6
$410.00
WP
$35.00
3
$105.00
DI
$45.00
4
$180.00
TOTAL
51,295,00
SITE CLOSURE
REQUEST
PM
$80.00
3
$240.00
WP
$35.00
I
$35.00
TOTAL
$27300
FINAL SITE
CLOSURE
REPORT
PM
$80.00
2
5160.00
WE
I
~
I
$35.00
TOTAL
$19500
Notes:
I:
This cost
is
Ion a Risk
Assesssssesai sipdaieor
for an FAaitswhich
one
boning
ormossicoring well was installed. 05,
WY,
and PM
time
nnxav
be increased
‘/,hosee ($t0.00)forevery stonsisoring
well or soil
boring installed during
a given
event
In additions,
the
RCAS may
bill
PM
(2 Iws.), 01(2
his.),
and
WP
(liar.) time
eotaling
$285.00
for the fi~sl
day
of
Direct
Push, and
$142.50 forevery
sdditaonal ¼
day
of
Direct
Push.
PART 9:
MARK-UP
53
ITEM
MAXIMUM
ALLOWABLE MARK-UP
LABORATORY COSTS
10
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
10
UTILITIES
l0
SUBCONTRACTED PROFESSIONAL
PERSONNEL
10
ALLOTHER SUBCONTRACTOR INVOICES
tS
Notes:
I
Mails-up
is
allowed
for the primasy contractor
nnd’or the
Registered Corrective
Action
Specialist (consultant).
Is may only
hr added
so
subconiracior
invoices. It
may
applied
only
once (for instance,
a
consultant may nor charge
a
mark-up upon
a
coil which
has been
masked-up by
a eubconis’nctor).
2:
Consultansls
and
contractors
may
not charge a
mark-upon
their
own
internal
expenses.
3:
Rerail
mark-up is
nol allowed. All invoices
on which
a manic-up
is
being
applied
muse
be submitled with
the Application for
Reimbursement.
54
PART
10:
CHANGE ORDERS
The preappro~edworkplan
and cost proposal represent the
accepted activity to
be performed
and
the
maximum
reimbursable cost
for
that activity
(Including
allowable
markup).
Modifications
to
the
preapproved workplan
and cost proposal
can
be made only
as follows:
Field Activity
Change Orders
On
occasion,
,site
specitic
circumstances
and
unforeseeable
developments
can
result
in
an
owner/operator incurring expenses exceeding the preapproved maximum cost.
Examples of situations
where this
can
occur are costs associated with drilling delays due to
bad weather, or
additional costs
assoc(ated w(th hitting an unantic(pated rock layer while drilling.
Please note that these
sthiations are
related
to
field
activities
and
not
office associated
act(v(ties.
Depending on
the
magnitude of the
unforseen problem, the owner/operator should proceed
as
follows:
Field activity changes resulting in
a cost change greater than
7
of
the preapproved amount:
If unanticipated events occur in the field during the performance of a preapproved activity which
cause
an additional
expense exceeding 7
of the total preapproved amount (e.g., an
amount greater than
$1,400.00 on
an activity ,preapproved for $20~000.00),
then
preapproval must be obtained from the
TNRCC
before
continuing
the activity.
Failure
to
obtain the
infield
approval
will
result
in
the
additional
costs
being
nonreimbursable.
Conditional verbal ~pproval
can
be obtained from
the
THRUC
to continue with the activity while in the field
however, tinal approval of the activity and costs will
be
granted
only after the review of a submitted field change order.
The change order must detail
the
additional
field activities and associated costs and must conform to the standard workplan
and cost
proposal format.
Field activity chai~ges
resulting in
a cost change exceeding the preapproved amount, but is less
than or equal to 7:
If
unanticipated events occur in
the field during the performance of a preapproved activity
which
cause
an additional expense exceeding the total preapproved amount, but is less than or equal to 7
of the
total preapproved amount
(eg.,
an amount less than orequal to $1,400.00 on
an activity preapproved
for $20,000.00), then a change order detailing the
additional field activities and associated costs must
be submitted
at the completion of the activity and must conform to
the standard workp!an and cost
proposal
format.
Infield apnroval prior
to continuing
the
activity is not required.
Approval of the
change order will
be granted only after
the review oil
submitted field change
order.
Field activity changes resulting
in
a cost change which
is less than
the
preapproved amount:
If unanticipated
events occurin the field during the performance of a preapproved activity which
cause
some ofthe scope ofwork
items to
be eliminated or not performed; then the associated costs sho~ild
be
reduced.
A change order does not need to
be
submitted for approval; however, documentation
should be submitted to
document the change in work scope and indicating that
this
activity has been
completed.
Should it
be determined
that
the activity is incomplete and the
original scope of work
should
be
performed, then
that scope
of work
should
be
completed for the
original
preapproved
amount.
General Change Orders
.
.
vuring tile
pertormance
ot a preapproved activity,
should any unanticipated non-field-activity eyents
occur which
cause
an additional expense exceeding the total
preapproved amount
(e.g., additional
personnel hours needed to handle
a change in municipal
permit
requirements),
a change order detailing
the
additional
activities
and
associated
costs
must be
submitted
and
must conform
to th?
ppnpai
workplan
and
cost
proposal
format.
Preapproval must be obtained
from
the TNRCC prior to inltiat~ng
the
additional activities.
Failure to obtain
the preapproval will
result in the
additional
costs being
nonreimbursable.
Final
approval will be granted only after the review of a submitted general change
order.
55
For
any
ofthe above-referenced change orders,
a copy of the change order documentation detailing
the
additional
activities
and
associated
costs
along with
a
copy of the
original
preapproved
cost
proposal
must
be
submitted
with
the
application
for
reimbursement
to
be
considered
for
reimbursement.
Th all
cases, the change order should document only
the additional
scope of work and
the
additional expenses
(e.g.,
the
additional
$1,400.00 on an activity preapproved for $20,000.00), not
the total activity.
If the
owner/operator continues
to complete the activity without preapproval of the
additional activities,
then the excess
costs are nonreimbursable.
Change orders
are intended for costs for unforseen or unanticipated events and are not to
be used for
adding
profit,
forgotten
items,
etc.
Al)
change orders
must be
documented
and justified.
If it
is
determined that the change
order is not warranted or sufficient justification
has not
been
provided, the
change order will not
be approved.
56
APPENDIX B
DEFINITIONS
and ACRONYMS
57
PART
1:
DEFINITIONS
FREE
PRODUCT MiGRATION- The continuous movement offree product
from the subsurface of
the
ground to the surfaceor from
the
subsurface
into
a subsurface receptor.
FREE
PRODUCT- (Also,
phase-separated
product.
Aiso
phase-separated hydrocarbon.
Also
piase
separated petroleum. Also
LNAPL.) A regulated
substance
in us
free-flowing non-aqueous liquid
phase at standard
conditions oftemperature
and pressure (i.e.,
liquid not dissoived
in wateror
adhering
to
soil)
that
is a!so a ‘~recoverable
free prçduei7
by the
definition
in
this
section.it
is
distinct
and visually separable from the
surrounding media. This definition
does
not including
hydrocarbon “sheens.”
LNAPL-
Light non-aqueous phase liquid- See“Free Product.”
PHASE-SEPARATED PRODUCT- See “Free product.”
PI-IASE.SEPARATED
HYDROCARBON-
See
“Free
product.”
PHASE SEPARATED
PETROLEUM-
See “Free Product”
RECOVERABLE FREE
PRODUCT- (Also, Recoverable
Phase
-Separated Product.
Also
Recoverable Phase-Separated
Rydrocarbon)
(I) Any
free
product
in continuous movement from the subsurfpce of
the
ground to the surface. (2) Free product
In a subsurface
receptor with a thickness greater
than
1/10th ofpne foot.
For reimbursement purposes, this does not inciude
free product
In
tankhoid
observation wells unless the site
meets the
requiremenis oI3OTAC 334.302
(a)(i).
RECOVERABLE PHASE-SEPARATED HYDROCARBON- See “Recoverabie free product.’~
RECOVERABLE PIIASE-SEPARATED PRODUCT- See “Recoverable free product.”
NOTE:
SEE
30
TAC
~$334.322
CONCERNING
SUBCHAPTER
H
DEFifHTrONs,
FOR
ADDITIONAL
DEFINITIONS.
58
PART 2: ACRONYMS
Section
AST
AboveginundStorage
Tank
I3OD
Biological Oxygen Demand
I3TEX
Benzerie, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes
CAD/CADD
Computer Aided Drafting/Computer Aided Drafting
& Design
CAP
Corrective
Action
Plan
CAPM
Corrective
Action
Project Manager
COD
Chemical Oxygen
Demand
cft
Cubic
Feet (volume)
cy
Cubic
Yard
(volume)
cfin
Cubic
Feet per Minute (air
flow)
DNAPL
Dense
Non-Aqueous
Phase
Liquid
(sinks
in
water)
DO
Dissolved Oxygen
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
FAR
Field Activity Report
ltD
Flame
Ionization Detector
ft
Feet (length)
CC
Gas Chromalograph
gpm
Gallons
per Minute
up
Horsepower
hr
Hour
ICAP
interim Corrective
Action Plan
ICU
internal Combustion
Unit
kg
Kilogram
Liter
lbs
Pounds
IF
Linear Feet
LEL
Lower Explosive Linut
LNAPL
Light Non-Aqueous
Phase Liquid (floats on
water)
LPST
Leaking Petroleum Storage
Tank
Milligram
MI
BE
Methyl Teitiaay Butyl Ether
MW
Monitoring Well
NAPL
Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid
O&M
Operation and Maintenance
OMP/OM&P
Operation,
Maintenance,
and
Performance
OVM
Organic Vapor
Meter
(see FID, PID)
PAH
Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbon
PE
Professional Engineer
P1D
Photo-Ionization Detector
PM
Project
Manager
ppb
Parts
per Billion
PPE
Personal Protective Equipment
ppm
Paris
per
Million
PSH
Phase-Separated
Hy~irocarbon
PSI
Petroleum Storage Tank
QA/QC
Quality
AssurancelQuality Control
EtA
Risk Assessment
RAP
Remedial Action Plan
I~A
Risk Based Assessment
RBCA
Risk Based Corrective
Action
RCAS
Registered Corrective ActionSpecialist
RCG
Reimbursable Cost Guidelines
RP
Responsible
Party
Senii-VOA
Semi-Volatile Organic Aromatic
Semi-VOC
Semi-Volatile
Organic Compound
SqIt, sf
Square Foot (area)
SVE
Soil
Vapor Extraction
TCLP
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
TDS
Total
Dissolved Solids
TOC
Total Organic Carbon
TOX
Total
Organic
Halogen
TPH
Total
Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
TNRCC
Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission
TWC
Texas Water Commission (now the TNRCC)
ug
Microgram
UST
Underground Storage Tank
VES
Vapor
Extraction System
VOA
Volatile
Organic Aromatic
VOC
Volatile Organic Compound
yd
Yard (length)
59
ATTACHMENT
7
10113/2
003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage Tank
Facilities
II.
RELEASE
REPORTING
Task
Unit Cost
Total
Units
Estimated Ci~F
tLR~loasefie~rting.~.
~
.....
.~
Prepare proposal, Meat With Client,
Travel
to
site,
Communicatewith
CCC
Principal
A.
Review/QAQC Report
$10000 /hr
I
hours
$100.00
Project Manager
A.
Project ManagementlPrepare Proposal
to Client
B, Meeting w/ Client
C. Travel
D.
Mileage
$75.00
/hr
$75.00
/hr
$75.00 hit
$1.00
/mi
1.5
hours
1.5
hours
2
hours
100
miles
$112.50
$112.50
$150.00
$100.00
$35.00
Clerical
A.
Correspondence/Filing
$35.00
/hr
I
hours
Additional Costs
A. Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
$2.50
Imi
miles
$0.00
I
.
...
Last Updated October
11, 2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines
for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage Tank
Facilities
Ill.
INITIAL
RESPONSE
& ABATEMENT
Task
,
Unit
Cost
Total
Units
Estimated
Cost
Ill. InitIal Response & Abatement
Prepare report(s). Other requirements
Principal
A.
Review/QAQC
Report
$100.00 /hr
I
hours
$100.OC
Project Manager
A. Prepare Report
B.
Prepare Required Checklist
C.
Review for Need
of Public Notice
$75.00 /hr
$75.00
/hr
$75.00 /hr
3
hours
I
hours
2
hours
$225.OC
$75.OC
$150.OC
Clerical
A.
Correspondence/Filing
$35.00
/hr
I
hours
$35.OC
‘lotal Cosj:fO
s~itiál.
Resjci’~se$~Al,ateruiesit
:i:.:..:
~..
.
.
$55.5
DO
Last Updated
October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement
Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage Tank
Facilities
IV.
SITE CHECK
& ISCR
Task
Unit Cost
Total
Units
LEstimated
Cost
.
.1
.....
..
~
.
IV...Site!.hec
1$CRJ
.
..
Prepare
reports, Other requirements
PrIncipal
A.
Review/QAQC
Report
$100.00
/hr
2
hours
$200.0c
Project Manager
A.
Prepare
Report
B.
Prepare Required Checklist
C.
Project Management
ID.
RegulatorylClient
Coordination
$75.00
/hr
$75.00
(hr
$75.00 (hr
$75.00
/1w
8
hours
I
hours
2
hours
1
hours
$600.0C
$75.0C
$150.0C
$75.0C
Staff
Hydrologist
A.
Perform
Sensitive Receptor Survey (660’)
B.
Site Sketch
C. Travel
D.
Mileage
.
$55.00
/hr
$55.00
/hr
$55.00
/hr
$1.00 (mi
6
hours
2
hours
2
hours
100 miles
$330.OC
$110.OC
$110.OC
$100.OC
Drafting
A.
Site Sketch
$45.00 Ihr
1
hours
-
$45.0C
Clerical
A.
Correspondence/Filing
$35.00
/hr
I
hours
$35.0C
Additignal
Costs
A.
Mileage Over
100 Miles Roundtrip
Per Diem (check
if applicable)
B.
Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage
in Third
Column
$2.10 /mi
miles
miles
$0.OC
$0.OC
:$~1,83O.OO
Last Updated October 11,2001
10/1 3/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement
Guidelines
for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
VI.
ORBCA TIER
2
Task
Unit
Cost
Total
Units
Estimated
Cost
VL~ORBCA1IGr2
.,
,.,
..
,
.
Data compilation, Report preparation
Principal
A.
Review/QAQC
Report
$100.00
/hr
6
hours
$600.00
Project
Manager
A.
Project Management
B.
Regulatory/Client Coordinatioi
C.
RiskAnaiysis/Report
$75.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
$75.00 /hr
10
hours
10
hours
24
hours
$750.00
$750.00
$1800.00
Drafting
A.
ORECA Maps/Logs
$45.00
/hr
10
hours
$450.00
Clerical
A.
Correspondence & Filing
$35.00 /hr
10
hours
$350.00
~
:~.
~
:.:..::..:~....i:..cI,eck
.~:.:.:
I
I
I
~
Check
here
if ORSCA
tier
2 Cases With Partial
or All Delineation (See
GuIdance~
$3
BOO 00
El
Check
here
if
Tier
2 Modified
Adcer~rjunl
$1
5Q0 00
Last
Updated
October
11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
VU.
SOIL
BORING
INSTALLATION
Task
Unit Cost
Total
Units
j
Estimated Cost
~
~
:.::.:~~:~
~
ProjectManagement
A.
Principal
Oversight
B.
Project Manager
$100.00
/hr
$75.00
(hr
2
hours
5
hours
$200.OOi
$375.OO~
~
$1
woo;
$110.00
$100.00
$80.00
$10.00
Field Work
Personnel &
Equipment
A. Supervise Drilling
B. Travel Time
C.
Mileage
D.
Organic Vapor Monitor
.
E.
Decon
Unit
$55.00 /hr
$55.00
Ihr
$1.00
Imi
$80.00 /day
$10.00
/day
2
hours
2
hours
100
miles
1
day
I
day
Subcontracted
SeMces &
Eguinment
A. Drill
& Continuous Sample
a
10
Diameter
Hole
B.
Mobilization/Demobilization
C.
Decon
D.
Mi(eage
E.
Drums
F,
Supp~es
C.
Laboratory Analyses (BTEX,
TPH
(GAO
or
DRO))
H.
Markup
$21.00
/ft
$30000
lea.
$125.00
lea.
$4.00
Imi
$30.00 /drum
$20.00
/unit
$105.00
Isamp~e
20
feet
I
ea.
I
ea.
100
cnUes
1
drums
1
units
1
samples
$420.00
$300.00
‘
$125.00
$400.00
$30.00
$20.00
$105.00
$140.00
Report Preparation
A. Project Manager
-
Report Preparation
B.
Clerical
C.
CADD Drafting
$75.00
/1w
$35.00 /hr
$45.00
/hr
2
hours
2
hours
1
hours
$150.00
$70.00
$45.00
Disposal
A.
Field Tech
Time
B.
Field Tech Travel
C. Fie’d Tech Mileage
$45.00 /hr
$45.00
/1w
$1.00
(mi
1
hours
2
hours
100
miles
$45.00
$90.00
$100.00
1~otaI
COst’fOr
Ofle:Bdri~~i:.:..
:.::.
~
$3~.O25~OO
I
I
I
I
—
I
In,tial Sofi Sonng Installation
$3,025 00
A.
B.
C.
Additional
Costs
Additional
Borings
Mileage
Over 100
Miles Roundtilp
Footage Over 20
ft
(per
boringift)
$710.00
$8.00
$40.00
/boring
/mi
Iboringlft
borings
miles
total extra ft
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Per Diem (Check Mileage ifApplicable)
$40.00
/boring/ft
miles
ft
total
ft
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
D.
E.
F.
Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage
in Third
Column
Enter Total Footage
in Third
Column
Deduction of $40/ft for Borings
lOft
Tbtal.CostfbrSOii.BPring
$3,025.00
The Stand-Alone
Boring cost to
be used when mobbing with other drilkng
activities.
Last Updated October
11, 2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage Tank
Facilities
VIII.
PUSH-PULL
PROBE
Task
Unit Cost
Total
Units
Estimated
Cost
uLi’?to
4j6.OTóet Per. Day)..
.
..........
~.:
Project Management
A. Princ~pa)
$100.00 /hr
2
hours
$200,O(
B.
Project Manager
$75.00
/hr
5
hours
$375.Q(
Staff-
Hydrologist
A.
Field
-
Day
$55.00
Ihr
8
hours
$440.O(
B.
Travel
$55.00
/hr
2
hours
$11O.OC
C.
Mileage
$1.00
/rfli
100
miles
$100.O(
Other
Staff
D.
Report Preparation
$75.00
/hr
2
hours
$~5O.OC
E.
C~ericaI
$35.00
/hr
2
hours
$70.OC
F.
Drafting
$45.00
(hr
7
hours
$315.00
Field Supplies
A. Drums
$30.00
/drum
2
drums
$60.00
6.
Misc.
$25.00
lea.
1
ea.
$25.00
0. Vapor Meter
(ie PIG,
OVA)
$80.00
Iday
1
days
$80.00
F.
Decon
$10.00
May
1
days
$10.00
SubTótá~I.
H
.1H
H:: .H.HHH*..1
:‘.
:HHHHH
~
~.:H~H
H
H
...
..::.:::
::*~*..:::H.H*:H*:H.~.Th.*:..
1:.~
A.
Rig
$1400.00
/ciay
1
days
$1400.00
B.
Mob
$200.00 /day
1
days
$200.00
C.
Decon
$125.00
/day
1
days
$125.00
0.
Mfleage
$3.00
/mi
100
mfles
$300.00
E.
Markup
$203.00
Disposal
A. Reid Tech Time
$45.00
/hr
I
hours
$45.00
8.
Field Tech
Travel
$45.00 Air
2
hours
$90.00
C.
Field Tech Mi)eage
$1.00 /mi
100
miles
$100.00
SubTotal. ii::
..*~:
,:
.:
...:.:::ii:::~:~
..::.:±.:.:.:.:i.:i~±~
:.::.:.*
$2~463MO
Additional
Costs
A. Additional Days
$2463.00
/day
days
$0.00
B.
Mileage Over
100 Miles Roundtñp
$6.60
/rni
miles
$0.00
Per Diem
C.
Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage
in
Third Column
miles
$0.00
ED.
Enter Total Footage in Third Column
ft
$0.00
.01
f*r:Piis1~._PU(t.Prob~(tQtjnded::to:I~IeaE~ettdO(Iat)
.•:
:.:.:
1.:.:.::.:.1..1:::.::~::.:..::.~::::.::.:
.•..•
...•.•...
.
.
..
..
Last Updated
October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines
for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
IX.
VAPOR WELL INSTALLATION
Task
Unit Cost
Total Units
Estimated Cost
IX~.VapOt..Wett~tfistaIIatlon~....
~
~
.
::.:::~J~..
Principal
A.
Oversight
.
$100.00
/hr
0.5
hours
$50.00
Project
Manager
A.
Project Management
$75.00
Ihr
4
hours
$300.00
Staff Hydrologist
A.
Supervise drilling
B.
TraveS
C.
Mileage
$55.00
/hr
$55.00
/hr
$1.00
/rni
3
hours
2 hours
100
mi’es
$165.00
$110.00
$100.00
Field Technician
A.
Samp~efSurvey(2People)/Disposal
B.
Trav& (3 man-hour trips)
C.
Mileage
(2
trips)
$45.00
/hr
$45.00 Ihr
$1.00
/rni
4
hours
6
hours
200 niiies
$160.00
$270.00
$200.00
Vapor
Welt
Report
A.
Project Management
B.
Map/Log
C.
Clerical
$75.00 /hr
$45.00 /hr
$35.00 /hr
2
hours
2
hours
2 hours
$150.00
$90.00
$70.00
Field
SUPDHOS
A.
Drums
8.
Misc.
$30.00
lea.
$25.00
lea.
2 ea.
I
ea.
$60.00
$25.00
Rental Equipment
A.
Organic Vapor Monitor
8.
Decon
$80.00
lea.
$10.00
lea.
1
ea.
lea.
$80.00
$10.00
Analytical Samples
A.
BTEX,
TPH
(8020/8015
or B~OO)
B.
Soil Vapor Sample
C.
Mark-up
$105.00
lea.
$175.00
lea.
I
ea.
1
ea.
$105.00
$175.00
$28.00
Drilling
and Completion
A.
2
or
4
PVC VaporWell
B.
Mob/Demob
C.
Decon
0.
Mileage
E.
Mark-up
$32.00
Moot
$300.00
lea.
$125.00
lea.
$4.00
/rn~
20
feet
I
ea.
I
ea.
100
miles
$640.00
$300.00
$125.00
$400.00
$150.00
Tothi
Cost for
I Vapor Well
I VW
$3,783.00
Additional
Costs
.
A.
Additional Vapor Wells
$1,795.00
/well
wefls
$0.00
(Includes
Lab
I
8.
Mileage Over 100
Miles Roundtrip
$8.00
(mile
mites
$0.00
C.
Footage Over 2011 (per well)
$75.00
111
/weII
tota’ extra ft
$0.00
0.
Footage
c
10
ft
per well deduct
$75.00
/it
/wetl
total ft
$0.00
Per Diem
E.
Enter Total Roundirip
Mileage
n
Third Column
miles
$0.00
rotaICot:ForAII.VaporWeiJs:(rouI~~1ed:to:peare$tdOtiat~::::::.::::::::::,:::::
.•...~.........•.vj
Last Updated October
11,
2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement
Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
X.
MONITORING
WELL INSTALLATION
Task
Unit
Cost
Total
Units
F
Estimated Cost
~
t
.
Principal
A.
Oversight
$100.00
Ihr
0.5
hours
$50.00
Project Manager
A.
Progect Management
$75.00
/hr
4
hours
$300.00
Staff
Hydrologist
A.
Supervise dr~II(ng
B. Travel
C.
Mileage
$55.00
Ihr
$55.00
/1w
$1.00
Irni
3
hours
2
hours
100 miles
$165.00
$110.00
$100.00
Field Technician
A.
Developfsarrple/Survey(2 People)/Disposal
B. Travel (4 man-hour trips)
C. Mileage (3 trips)
$45.00 /hr
$45.00 /hr
$1.00
Imi
6
hours
8
hours
300
mfles
$270.00
$360.00
$300.00
Monitoring Well Report
A.
Project Management
B.
Map/Log
C.
Clerical
$75.00 /hr
$45.00 /hr
$35.00 /hr
2
hours
2
hours
2
hours
.
$150.00
$90.00
$70.00
Field Supplies
A.
Drums
B.
Bailer
C.
Misc.
$30.00
lea.
$10.00
lea.
$25.00
lea.
2
ea.
I
ea.
1
ea.
$60.00
$10.00
$25.00
Rental Equipment
A.
Organic Vapor Monitor
B.
Oil/Water Interface Probe
C.
Survey Equipment
D.
Decon
$80.00 lea.
$45.00
lea.
$25.00 lea.
$10.00
lea.
1
ea.
1
ea.
1
ea.
I
ea.
$80.00
$45.00
$25.00
$10.00
Analytical Samples
A.
BTEX, TPH
(8020/8015 or 8100)
B.
Mark-up
$105.00
lea.
3
ea.
$315.00
$31.50
Drilling and
Completion (20
ft
A. 2” or 4” PVC Monitoñng Well
B. Mob/Demob
C. Decon
0. Mileage
E.
Mark-up
$32.00 /ft
$300.00
lea.
$125.00
lea.
$4.00
/mi
20
feet
1
ea.
1
ea.
100
miles
$640.00
$300.00
$125.00
$400.00
$150.00
Total Cost tori
Monitoring Well
1
MW
$4,181 50
Additional Costs
A. Additional Monitoring
Wells
(Includes Lab)
B.
Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
C.
Footage
Over 20
ft
(per well)
0. Footage
‘C
lOft per weD
deduct
Per Diem
E.
Enter Total
Raundtrip Miieage in Third
Column
F. Enter Total
Installation Footage
in Third
Column
$2,185.00 /wefl
$12.70
/mi
$75.00
/ftlwell
$75.00
/ft/weII
wells
miles
total extra ft
total ft
miles
ft
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
lotaiCóStHEorAIi J~
.4,1 82.00
Last Updated October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
XL
MONITORING
WELL SAMPLING
Task
Unit
Cost
Total
Units
EEstimated Cost
~
XI
MonItor~npW.I1 Sampling
Project
Management
A.
Project Manager
$75.00 /hr
6.5
hours
$487.50
Gaugina. Purging,
&
Sampling
A.
Technician
B.
Technician Travel Time
C. Techrilciari Mileage
0.
Diaphragm
Pump For Weil Purging
E.
Oil/Water Interface Probe
F.
Decon Unit
$45.00 /hr
$45.00 /hr
$1.00
mi
$45.00
Iday
$40.00
/day
$10.00
Iday
I
hours
2
hours
100
miles
1
days
1
days
1
days
$45.00
$90.00
$100.00
$45.00
$40.00
$10.00
Equipment & Subcontracted Ser,ices
A.
55-Gallon Drums
B.
Disposable
Bailers
C. Suppkes
0. Laboratory Analyses (BTEX, TPH(GRO or CR0))
E.
Markup
$30.00
/drum
$10.00
/unit
$23.50
funft
$105.00 /samp~e
I
drums
I
units
I
unRs
1
samples
$30.00
$10.00
$23.50
.
$105.00
$16.50
Purge Water Disposal
A. Technician
B.
Technician Travel Time
C. Technician Mileage
$45.00 /hr
$45.00
/hr
$1.00 /mi
2
hours
2
hours
100
miles
$90.00
$90.00
$100.00
Monitoring Report
A.
Principal
-
ONOC
B. Project Manager
-
Report Preparation
C.
Project Manager
-
PreparaUon for Graphs,
Figures, Tables,
and
Maps
0. Clerical
E. CAD
Drafting
$100.00 /hr
$75.00
/hr
$75.00 /hr
$35.00
/hr
$45.00
/hr
2
hours
B
hours
2
hours
4.5
hours
4 hours
$200.00
$600.00
$15000
$157.50
$180.00
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
.H:$2,57Q.OO.
AdditionalCosts
A.
8.
Addftional
WeDs (includes
lab)
.
Mileage Over 100 Miles Roundtrip
$220.00
$3.80
/welI
Irni
wells
miLes
$0.00
$0.00
Per Diem (Check Mileage If Applicable)
miles
$0.00.
C.
EnterTotal Roundtrip Mileage
in Third Column
D.
Enter
Total Footage
in Third
Column
ft
$0.00
Total
.C~t
for M
:TT:T:7$2S7~Mj
Last Updated OCtober
11,2001
10/1
3/2 003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines
for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
XII.
OTHER
LAB ANALYSIS
RATES
XH,Qtbet.Lab..AnaIys
Rates
.,
~
,.
.
.
.
.
Analysis
Unit
Total
Units
Overnight
Estimated Cost
Acetone
$62.50
samples
S
Ammonia
$15.00
samples
0
so.oo
BTEX and TPH
Combined
(Mod
6020/8015)
El
(Gasoline)
$105.00
samples
$0.00
BTEX and
TPI-I Comb(ned (Mod
602018015)
D
(Diese’)
$105.00
samples
$0.00
BTEXTTPH-G/Naphthalene (Gasoflrie)
$150.00
samples
$0.00
BTEX, TPH
-
Gas
& Diesel
(Mod 8020/8015,
Mod
6000/8100) (Diesel, Used Oil)
$155.00
samples
$0.00
BTEX/TPF-I
(Air)
$175.00
samples
0
$0.00
Chloride
$10.00
samples
$0.00
Bulk Density
(Dry) ASTM Method
D2937-63
$20.00
samples
U
$0.00
C02 (Air)
$50.00
samples
El
$0.00
EPTOX
$35.00
samples
U
$0.00
Grain Size Anaiysis (Distribution)
Seive AnaIys~s
$135.00
samples
$0.00
Flashpoint
$25.00
sampies
D
$0.00
FOC (Walkley Black Method)
$50.00
samples
C
$0.00
Hydrocarbon Scan
$100.00
samp’es
$0.00
Iron
$15.00
samples
D
$0.00
Hydraulic Conductivity ASTM Method D5084-90
$180.00
samples
$0.00
Lead (Total Lead)
$35.00
samples
$0.00
Hydrometer Grain Size plus Sieve AnaIys~s
$90.00
samp’es
U
$0.00
MaE
$50.00
samples
0
$0.00
MPK
$30.00
samples
0
$0.00
MTBE
(8020)
$50.00
samples
El
$0.00
MTBE
(8260A)
$250.00
samples
D
$0.00
Nitrate
$24.00
samples
El?
$0.00
Oil
& Grease
$35.00
sanipies
D
$0.00
Oxygen
$20.00
samples
D
$0.00
Naphthalene (Mod
802018015)
(Gasoline or Diesel)
o
$45.00
samples
Moisture
$10.00
samples
0
pH
$10.00
samples
0
PAK
$144.00
samples
Total Pherialic (EPA 420.1)
$40.00
samples
0
Phenol (Gaschrom/MS Method 625)
$80.00
samples
0
Phosphorous
$25.00
samples
0
Porosity (Wet and/or Dry)
$50.00
samples
0
Potassium Analyses
$17.25
samples
Purgeab~eHa~ocarbon
$65.00
samples
Permeability
$180.00
samples
0
Sieve Analysis
$45.00
samples
0
Specific Gravity
____________________________
$50.00
__________
samples
______
Last Updated
November
20,
2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
FaciIit~es
XII.
OTHER
LAB
ANALYSIS
RATES,
PG
2
OF
2
Xli
Other Lab Analysis
Rates,
Page
2
of
2
Analysis
Unit
Total
Units
Overnight
Estimated Cost
Sulfide
TCLP Metals TOX Characteristics (Leaching
Pràcedures)
-Lead
Only
-
8
Metal
-1 Volatiles EPA 624,
8249, 8260
-
1
Semi-Volatiles EPA 625, 8270
TDS (Total
Dissolved Solids)
TEN Method 8015 Modified (DRO)
TOX (Total Organic Halogen)
TPH Method 8020 Modified (GRO)
Treated H20
(BTEX,
Phenols,
PH, TOG) Effluent
TW-1
Phenol,
0
& 0,
PH
Preparation
TOC (Soil)
TOC (Water) (EPA Yr.5.1)
Volumetric Water Content ASTM
Method 02216-90
$10.00
$200.00
$50.00
$325.00
$315.00
$525.00
$10.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$165.00
$85.00
$10.00
$60.00
$55.00
$20.00
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
sarnptes
samp’es
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
$0.00
$0.00
E
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
D
$0.00
U
$0.00
$0.00
El
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
0
.
$0.00
Eli
$0.00
0
$0.00
Hydrocarbon Analysis:
BTEX 8020/8015
BTEX & Naphthalene Mod
802018015
TPH
(GRO)
Mod
802018015
BTEX 8020/8015
BTEX-Naphthaiene Mod
8020)8015
TPH (DRO) Mod 8000/8100
PAR 8100/6270/8310 HPLC
TPH
(CR0
&
DRO)
Mod
8000/8100
TCLP
TCLP
Set
Up
$55.00
5105.00
$50.00
$55.00
$105.00
$50.00
$144.00
$100.00
$200.00
$50.00
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
samples
fl
$0.00
fl
$000
U
$0.00
C
$0.00
C
$0.00
fl
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
El
$0.00
$0.00
1~btat
~
Last Updated
November 20,
2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines
for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage Tank
Facilities
XVI.
DISPOSAL
Task
Unit Cost
Total
Units
Estimated
Cost
...
j.:.
x~/t.LispoèaI
~...
~
.
A. Water Disposal
-
Fftst Drum
jJ
B. Water Disposal
-
Every Gallon Thereafter
C. Water Disposal SampleiBTEX,
TPH,
(GRO or DRO),
Flashpoint, Total
Lead;
1
composite water sample per disposal
event (markup
included)
0
0.
SoU Disposal
-
First Drum
0
E.
Soil Disposal
Every Drum Thereafter
F.
Soil Disposal Samp’e BTEX,
TPH, (GRO or DRO), Total
Lead
One Composite Sample per event,
Includes
Markup
0
G. Bulk Waste Water
K.
BuCk Rate Free Product
$200.00
(drum
$2.00
/gat
$180.00 /sample
$200.00
/drurn
$65.00
/drum
$154.00 /sample
$0.45
/gal
$0.95
(gal
0
drum
gallons
0
sample
C
drum
drums
0 sample
gallons
gallons
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Additional Costs
A.
Mileage over 100 Miles
Roundtrip
(do
not use
in Bulk
Rate Disposal)
a.
Hourly
charge for bulk
rate
pick-up and disposal
(includes
mileage)
$3.25
/mi
$75.00
/hr
miles
hours
$0.00
$0.00
here
if Disposa’ Costs not included in other tasks ~$tanthAloneDispoSaJ)~I.:H::III.~.
1*.
For Stand-Alone Disposal
(When Box
is Checked),
Use Additional
Mileage Rats
Below
Project Management
A. Principal
B.
Project Manager
$100.00
mc
$75.00
/1w
1
hours
2 hours
$100.00
$150.00
Field Work
Technician
A. Technician
Work Time
B. Travel
Time
(2
Trips)
C. Mileage
$45.00 /hr
$45.00 /hr
$1.00
(mi
2
hours
4
hours
200
miles
$90.00
$180.00
$200.00
Additional Costs
A.
Mileage over 100 Miles
Roundtrip
$6.05
/rni
miles
$0.00
Last Updated October 11,2001
10/13/2003
Task
Unit
Cost
Total
Units
Estimated
Cost
XIX
High4acfLow.Va~
Project Management
A.
Principal
B. Project Manager
$100.00
/hr
$75.00 /hr
2
hours
5
hours
$200.00
$375.00
Field Tech
A.
Field
-
Day
B. Travel
C.
Mileage
$45.00 /hr
$45.00
/hr
$1.00 /mi
8
hours
2
hours
100
miles
$360.00
$90.00
$100.00
Other Staff
D.
Report Preparation
E. Clerical
$75.00
/1w
$35.00 /hr
2 hours
2
hours
$150.00
$70.00
$jj.bitotalJ.I
Vacuum Truck
A.
Nigh
Vac (includes
markup)
B. Low Vac (includes markup)
$2,750.00
Iday
$77.00
/hour
days
hours
$0.00
$0.00
Additional Costs
A.
Mileage
Over 100 Miles Roundtrip,
mci. Rig
Mileage
(only
applicable
on High-Vac)
$3.45
/mi
miles
$0.00
Per Diem
B. Enter Total
Roundtrip Mileage
in Third Column
miles
$0.00
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
XIX.
HIGH
VACUUM-MULTI
PHASE
EXTRACTION
a
•~.
:~.•~•H•:.~.
*:t.
000
$1,345~OO
Last Updated October 11,
2001
10/13/2003
Recommended
Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
Appendix A:
Stand-Alone
Time
And
Materials
Task
Unit
Cost
Total
Units
Estimated
Cost
Appendix A
Stand.Alone
Time
and
Materiats
A.
Professional Hourly
Rates
Principal
$100.00
/hr
hours
$O.OC
8.
Senior Hydro~ogisUEngineer
$8500
/hr
hours
so.oc
C.
Project
Manager
$75.00
/1w
hours
$O.OC
0. Senior Technician/Staff Hydrologist
$55.00 liv
hours
$O.Oc
E.
Draftsman/Field Technician
$45.00 /hr
hours
$O.OC
F.
Clerical/General Laborer
$35.00 /hr
hours
$O.0C
Units and Costs
A.
$aEiers
$10.00
/bailer
bailer
$O.OC
B.
Barricades (rental)
$7.00
/barricade
barricade
$O.OC
C.
Base Map
Standard
Time
=
4 hours
$75.00 /hr
hours
$O.OC
D.
Data
Logger and Trans (rental)
$200.00
/day
days
$0.OC
E.
Decon
Unit (rental)
$10.00 /day
days
$O.OC
F. Develop/Sample/Survey(2
People)/Disposal
(Standard Time
=
6 hours
$45.00 /hr
hours
$0.00
3.
DEaphragm
Pump (rental)
$45.00 /day
days
$0.00
H.
Drums
$30.00 /druni
drums
$0.00
I.
FID (rental)
$80.00
/day
days
$O.OC
J. Historical Research/Site Visit/Safety
Plan
Standard
Time
=
6 hours
$75.00
/hr
hours
$0.00
K. Monitoring Well (20(4”)
$32.00
Ift
ft
$O.OC
L. Oil/Water Interface Probe
(rental)
$45.00
Iday
days
$0.00
M. ORBCA Maps/Logs (Drafting)
(Standard Time
=
10
hours
$45.00
/hr
hours
$0.00
N.
Organic Vapor Monitor (rental)
$80.00
Iday
days
$0.00
0. OVA (rental)
$80.00
Iday
days
$0.00
P. OWRB
Search
Standard
Time
=
4 hours
$75.00
/hr
hours
$0.00
Q. PID (rental)
$80.00
May
days
$0.00
R.
Research (Public Notification
-
Staff Hydro)
(Standard Time
=
1
hour
$55.00
/hr
hours
$O.OC
S. Risk Analysis Report (Tier 1/lA)
(Standard Time
=
30 hours
$75.00
/hr
hours
$0.00
1.
Risk AnaLysis Report (Tier 2)
(Standard Time
=
24 hours
$75.00
11w
hours
$0.00
U. Sensitive Receptor Survey (660’)
Standard
Time
=
6
hours
$55.00
11w
hours
$0.00
V. Sign
(Public Notification)
$150.00
lea,
ea.
$0.00
W. Site Sketch
(Drafting)
Standard
Time:
1
hour)
$45.00
(hr
hours
$0.00
X. Site Sketch (Hydrologist)
Standard
Time
=
2 hours)
$55.00
(hr
hours
$0.00
V. Survey
Equipment (rental)
$25.00
(day
days
$0.00,
Z. Water Depth Gauge
(rental)
$40.00
(day
days
$0.00.
Mileage
Rates
$0.00
A.
Car
$0.50
/mi
miles
$0.00
8. Truck
(all trucks)
$1.00 /mi
miles
$0.00
C.
Disposal,
etc.
$2.50
Irni
miles
$0.00
Per Diem
Per Diem Days
$65.00
/day
days
$0.00
Last Updated
October II,
2001
10/13/2003
Jotal
Costfor Time andMat~rja4s.:.
•
s~Oo
Last Updated October
11,2001
10/13/2003
Recommended Reimbursement Guidelines for
Oklahoma Leaking Storage Tank Facilities
XVII. PASSIVE FREE PRODUCT
RECOVERY/REMOVAL WORKSHEET
Task
(Based on
200 ft/day)
lunit
Cost
)Total
jUnits
jEstimated Cost
El
Click Here
for
4$ day report
$0.00
Project Management
A.
Project
Manager
B.
Tech Travel
C.
Tech
(Sock
RepLacement, Bailing, Gauging, Decon)
D.
Tech Mileage
$75.00
$45.00
$45.00
$1.00
/hr
/hr
/hr
/mileage
1
2
2
100
hours
hours
boucs
miles
$75.00
$90.00
$90.00
$100.00
EpuiDment Per Event
A, Oil/Waler Probe
B. Decon
C.
Drum
D.
Supplies
$45.00
$10.00
$30.00
$50.00
/day
/day
leach
/each
1
1
I
1
days
days
drums
unit
$45.00
$10.00
$30.00
$50.00
Additional Costs
Per Event
A.
Additional Wells
B. Mileage
Over
100 miles Roundirip
$50.00
$2.50
/weIl
Icriile
wells
miles
-
$0.00
$0.00
Per Diem
C.
Enter Total Roundtrip Mileage
D.
Enter Total
Footage
in Third
Column (200)
—
30
miles
feet
$0.00
$0.00
m.~.
..v..~
.......
$O~oO:
Quarterly (One Timel DisDosal:
A.
Tech
B.
Tech Travel
C.
Mileage
$45.00
$45.00
$1.00
/hr
/hr
Imi
I
2
100
hours
hours
miles
$45.00
$90.00
—
$100.00
Total
1
6
3
2
$235.00
Quarterly (One Timel Report
A.
Principal
B. Project
Manager
C.
Clerical
0.
Drafting
$100.00
$75.00
$35.00
$45.00
/hr
11w
/hr
Ihr
hours
hours
hours
hours
$100.00
$450.00
$105.00
$90.00
Total
$745.00
Quarterly Additional Cost
A.
Passive
Skimmer
(2”
or
4’)
$150.00
j/weIl
j
weils
$0.00
l~ótaICdit.fcs
~
:~::::.::::.::::
.
Last Updated
October
11,
2001
10/13/2003
Last Updated October
11,2001
10/13/2003
Task
Unit Cost
Total
Units
I
Estimated Cost
A. All inclusive
professional time
(including
worksheet,
phonecalls,
etc.)
$75.00 /hour
4
hours
$300.00
B. Sampling Backfill
(1
composite
sample per
50yd3
$13.75
/sample
samples
$0.00
C.
Report:
includes Site &
Sample
Map,
Measured Pit Dimensions, Sample
Analysis, etc.
$75.00 /hour
I
hours
$75.00
D. When Backfill is Contaminated,
See
Guidance-Excavating, Hauling, Replacing
Run
Tank Racer
-
Recommended
Reimbursement
Guidelines
for
Back to top
Oklahoma
Leaking
Storage
Tank
Facilities
Back to top
XXV.BF
(Back-Fill)
Total for SF
..
.
.
.
$a75.UU
Last Updated
October
11,
2001
ATTACHMENT
8
Bureau of
Land and Waste Management
Underground Storage Tank Program
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC
29201
Telephone
(803)
898-4350
Fax (803) 898-4330
May
15,
2001
SUPERB
ACCOUNT
ALLOWABLE COSTS
Underground
Storage
Tank
(UST)
owners
or
operators,
who
are
responsible
for
releases that
are
qualified
to
receive
monies
from
the
State
Underground
Petroleum
Environmental
Response Bank
(SUPERB)
Account,
will
be
notified
when
monies
are
available
to
perform
necessary
site
rehabilitation
actions.
Those
releases
posing
the
greatest identified
risk
to human health
and the environment
receive
ftrnding priority.
The
classification
system
by
which
the
risk
and
finding
priority
is
determined
is
outlined
in
the
SUPERB
Site
Rehabilitation
and
Fund
Access
Regulations,
R.61-98.
The
SUPERB Act
requires that all
costs for
site rehabilitation receive prior approval
from
the Department.
If
the UST owner or
operator wishes to proceed
with site
rehabilitation actions
for a
release that
is
not currently
funded due
to
its
low
classification,
the
Department
has
a
deferred
compensation
contract that allows the
UST
oWner
oroperator to
receive
approval
for reasonable costs with possible future compensation
from the SUPERB
Account.
-
UST
owners or
operators may select their
own
site rehabilitation contractor to perform
necessary
actions
in accordance with
the
criteria
and
allowable
costs established
by
the
Department.
As
a customer service,
the
Department can directly
procure
the
services
of
a
site
rehabilitation
contractor
for
UST
owners
and
operators
upon
their request.
Any contractor who
performs
UST
site
rehabilitation work
in
South Carolina must
be certified
by
the Department.
Allowable costs for site
assessment,
abandonment, and monitoring
tasks
are outlined
below.
For
active
corrective
action,
the
Department’s criteria
requires
notice in
South
Carolina
Business
Opportunities to obtain
technically acceptable
proposals
and establish the SUPERB
allowable
cost.
Established
Scopes of Work
See
applicable guidance
document
for
required
tasks
Scope of Work
Southeast Region
All Other Counties
Initial
Ground-Water
$1,195.00
$1,395.00
Assessment
Tier
I
Assessment
$9,880.00
$10,880.00
Notes:
(I)
The Southeast region includes
the following
counties: Beaufort,
Berkeley, Charleston,
Colleton, Dorchester,
Georgetown, Hampton, Horry,
Jasper, Marion,
and Williamsburg
(2)
If
the total well
footage
exceeds
25
feet
for
an
Initial Ground-Water Assessment
(IGWA)
or
75
feet for a
Tier
I
Assessment,
the
additional
footage can be
charged
to
the
account at
the
component rate
listed below. Costs
associated
with
sampling
of receptors
(ground-water wells) within
a
500 foot radius
of
the
source,
and
sampling for metals
at
waste oil
USTs
can
be
charged
by submitting
an
assessment component invoice
with
the
IGWA,
or
Tier I
invoice.
As the
price for the
standard scope
includes all
project coordination
and
report
preparation costs,
a
15
percent markup
or handling
fee
will
not be
allowed
for
additional
items
added
to
the
IGWA
or
Tier I
invoice.
PRfl~uYrIr pytoTr.r.T
PROS?.
Sniirl, (‘arnIni~
Department
oF He~,Ith
rind
Knvirnn mentAl
4
cIrltTnl
May
15,
2001
Page
2
SUPERB
Allowable
Assessment Costs Per Component
rENt
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
I.
Plan
Preparation
A.Tier
II or
Monitoring Plan
each
$
100.00*
B.
Tax
Map
each
$
50.00
2.
Receptor Survey
each
$
5OO.OO~
3.
Comprehensive
Survey
each
$
1,000.00
4.
Mob/Demob
A.
Equipment
each
$
500.00
B.
Personnel
each
$
250.00
5.
Soi!
Borings
(hand
auger)
per foot
$
14.00*
6.
Soil Borings
(requiring
equipment,
push technology,
etc.)
or
Field Screening (i.e.,
water
sample,
soil
sample,
or soil
gas sample)
per foot
$
l7.OO~
7.
Soil
Leachability
Model
each
$
200.00
S.
Abandonment
per foot
$ 4.00
9.
Welt Installation
A.
Water
Table (hand
auger) per foot
$
20.00
B.
Water
Table (drill
rig)
per foot
$
38,00*
C.
Telescoping
per
foot
$
58.00
D.
Rock Drilling
per foot
$
58.00*
10.
Sample Collection
A.
Ground-Water
per
well or receptor
$
55.00
B.
Air
or Vapors
per receptor
$ 90.00
11.
Analyses-Groundwater
A.
BTEX+Napth. +MTBE
per sample
$
100.00
B.
BTEX+Napth.
+MTBE
per rush sample
$
120.00
C.
BTEX-1-Napth.
+MTBE+
Trimethylbenzene
per
sample
$
135.00
D.
PAHs
per sample
$
120.00
E. Lead
per sample
$
20.00
F.
EDB
per sample
$
55.00
G.
8 RCRA
Metals
per sample
$
140.00
H.
TPH (9070)
per sample
$
55.00
1.
pH
per sample
$
10.00
J.
BOD
per
sample
$
40.00
K.
Nitrate
per sample
$
20.00
L.
Sulfate
per
sample
$
20.00
M.
Ferrous Iron
per sample
$
20.00
N.
Methane
per
sample
$
110.00
0.
Organic Lead
per
sample
$
100.00
P.
s
Oxygenates
per
sample
$
85.00
Analyses-Soil
Q.
BTEX +Napth.
per sample
$
100.00
R.
PAL-IS
per sample
$
120.00
S.
S
RCRA
Metals
per sample
$
150.00
1.
TN-I
(9071)
per sample
$60.00
May
15, 2001
Page
3
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
Analyses-Soil Continued
U.
TPU
(3550B/80l5B)
per sample
$65.00
V.
TPH (50308/80158)
per
sample
$65.00
W. Grain size / hydrometer
per sample
$
75.00
X.
Total Organic Carbon
per sample
$
35.00
12. Aquifer Characterization
A.
Pumping
Test
per
hour
$
120.00*
B.
Slug
Test
per test
$
150,00*
13. Free Prod
Recovery
Rate
Test
each
$
120.00
14. Fate(Transport Modeling
A.
Mathematical
Model
each
$
300.00
B.
Computer
Model
each
$
500.00
IS.
Tier!
Risk
Evaluation
each
$300.00
Tier
II Risk
Evaluation
each
$
500.00
16.
Subsequent
Survey
each
$
260.00*
F7.
Disposal
A.
Wastewater
I.
Purging/sampling
drum
$
90.00
2.
Pumping
Test
gallon
$
O.60
B.
Free Product
drum
$
110.00’
C.
Soil
Treatment/Disposal
ton
$
SO.00
drum
$
50.00
~8.Miscellaneous
each
preapproved
19.
Report
Preparation
and
Project
Coordination
15
of total
for
non-standard scopes
*The
appropriate
mobilization
cost
can
be added
to
complete these tasks,
as
necessary.
Description
of Tasks Associated with
Allowable Costs
1.
PLAN
PREPARATION
includes
all
tasks
associated
with
the
preparation
and
submittal
of
a Tier
11
Assessment, well abandonment, monitoring,
or other plan
requested
by
the
Department.
One personnel
mobflization shall
be allowed to conduct
a survey of site conditions
and
to
obtain the tax map prior to plan
preparation,
An additional $50.00 may
be allowed to obtain
and report the information from
the applicable
tax map, if the
information
has not previously obtained
as part
of
the Tier
I,
Tier 11,
or other report.
2.
RECEPTOR
SURVEY includes
all tasks
associated with the location, documentation (on
an
approximately
scaLed
site map),
and
screening of
all
potentially impacted receptors within
1,000
feet
of
the
facility
being
investigated.
A
receptor includes
any
person,
structure,
surface water
body, basement,
utility,
sensitive
habitat,
andtor water supply
well
that
are or may
be
affected
by
a
release.
Screening
means
semi-
quantitative
measurement
for hydrocarbons using properly calibrated field
instruments
such
as organic
vapor
analysis, immunoassay, and/or explosive limit indicator.
One
personnel
mobilization
may
be added
to this
item if it
shall
be
conducted independent of other tasks.
May
15, 200!
Page 4
3.
COMPREFIENSIVE SURVEY includes
all
tasks
associated
with the
spatial
location
(both
horizontal
and
elevations) of all
existing and
former
underground
storage
tanks,
lines,
dispensers,
above
and
below
ground
structures, and potential
receptors (identified during the receptor survey). This survey
shall
be
performed
by
a
S.C.
Certified
Surveyor.
The
cost
for
travel
to
and
from
the
site
by
the
certified
surveyor
and
completion
of the
S.C.
Certified
Survey
Map
are
included
in
the
rate.
The
report
will
include a plat
or
map signed or certified
by
the surveyor. Mobilization
may
not
be added to this
task. Only
one comprehensive
survey will
be
allowed per
site.
4.
MOBILIZATION / DEMOBILIZATION
a) Drilling or field screening
equipment
-
includes
all
costs and
mileage to transport equipment,
materials,
and
personnel
to
and
from
the site
to
include
all
hotel,
motel, meals,
and
other
per diem
costs.
One
mobilization
may
be
allowed
to
conduct
the field
screening using
direct push equipment and
a
second
equipment
mobilization may
be
allowed for the drill rig to
install
permanent monitoring wells.
Additional
equipment
mobilizations will
not
be
allowed
for mobilization of drilling
support trucks or equipment.
More
than
two
equipment
mobilizations
at
any
site
shall
require
justification
and
preapproval
by
the
Department
for
payment.
If
the
geologist
that will
oversee
field
screening
or
well
installation
is
not
associated with the
welt driller’s
firm
or company,
a
personnd
mobilization,
in
addition to the
equipment
mobilization,
shall
be
allowed.
The
plan
shall
document
and
justify
more
than
two
equipmeht
mobilizations for a
site. If the vertical
and horizontal
extent of chemicals of concern are
not thIly defined
by
the tier report, additional mobilizations may not
be
approved
by
the Department.
b)
Personnel
mobilization
includes
all
personnel
travel
time,
per
diem,
hotel,
motel,
food,
mileage,
equipment, and
materials necessary
for completion of site
activities
that
do
not
include mobilization of
heavy equipment such
as direct push vehicles or
drill
rigs.
As many components
as possible should
be
conducted simultaneously
so that unnecessary mobilizations
are not conducted (e.g., Aquifer testing can
be
completed
during the same mobilization event as ground-water sample collection,
subsequent survey,
and
a receptor survey.).
Additional mobilizations shall
not
be
allowed
for
several
persons
or several
vehicles all
going
to
the site
at
the
same time.
The
item number for each
personnel
mobilization shall
be
shown on
the assessment component cost
proposal form.
5.
SOIL BORINGS
(hand auger) includes all
costs
to
advance the boring(s),
collect
soil, ground-water or
vapor samples
as
necessary,
describe the soil lithology,
screen for organic volatiles, and complete the
soil
boring
logs.
Soil
sample
shipping
and
analytical
cost
is
included
in component
#10.
Boring
abandonment may
be billed
separately. Boring
logs or DHEC
form
1903s will indicate if installation
was
by
hand
auger ormachinery
e.g., drill rig.
Any
boring converted to a permanent monitoring well will be
compensated
only for
the installation of the permanent well.
6.
FIELD
SCREENING/
SOIL
BORINGS (requiring equipment
-
e.g., drilling
rig,
push technology)
includes
all
personnel, equipment,
and
materials associated with the
advancement of temporary
borings/wells,
collection of soil, gas, or water samples,
and analysis of the samples
using field
calibrated
instruments
or test
kits e.g., organic vapor analysis, immunoassay,
and comp’etion of boring! well
completion
logs
or DFIEC
form
1903.
If the geologist that will oversee field
screening is
not associated with the well
driller’s
firm
or company,
a personnel mobilization, in
addition
to
the equipment mobilization, shall
be
allowed. Boring or screening
logs will indicate the
name of the SC Certified Well Driller and
if
installation
was
by
hand
auger or machinery e.g., drill rig,
push technology.
Any
screening point
converted to
a
permanent monitoring well
will
be
compensated only for the
installation of the permanent well.
May
15,
2001
Page
5
7.
SOIL
LEACHABILITY
MODEL
includes
all
costs associated with the prediction
ofthe fate and transport
øfpetroleum
through the soil
to the ground water
using either the Departments
eachability model or any
other equivalent method
and completion of the Departments
form.
8.
ABANDONMENT
includes
all
personnel,
equipment,
and
material
costs
associated
with
the
proper
abandonment of
temporary
or permanent monitoring wells or borings with a
borehole diameter exceeding
one
inch
in
accordance
with
the
S.C.
Well
Standards
and
Regulations
1(61-71
under
the
direct
supervision of a certified
SC well
driller.
One mobilization may
be added to this task,
as appropriate
(see
#4b above).
9.
WELL INSTALLATION
includes all
personnel,
equipment,
and
materials to install
permanent water table,
rock wells,
and telescoping wells in accordance with
the S.C. Well
Standards
and Regulations R.61-71
under the
supervision
of
a
S.C.
certified
well
driller,
describe
the
soil
lithology,
screen
for
organic
volatiles,
develop
the
well,
determine
the
depth
to
ground
water
and
free
product,
containerize
all
generated
drill
cuttings
and
development/purge
waters,
and
complete
well
completion
logs.
If
the
geologist
that will
oversee field
screening
is
not
associated with the well driller’s firm or company,
a
personnel mobilization, ~n
addition to the equipment mobilization, may be allowed.
A
separate mobflization
shall not
be
allowed for well drilling or other support trucks.
A single
per
rate
foot will
be charged
tbr
each
drilled well
e.g.,
a well
drilled 20
feet in saprolite and
20 foot
in bedrock will
be
considered 40
feet
of rock drilling
with only
one equipment mobilization. A completed
DHEC
Form
1903
or similar form
indicating the method of well
installation e.g.,
hand auger,
air rotary,
hollow stem
auger will
be submitted
with the
final
report.
10.
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
includes
all
personnel,
equipment,
and
materials
necessary
for
purging,
collection of samples,
preparation of vapor or ground-water samples,
and shipment to a
laboratory.
The
collection
cost
includes
all
instruments required to document well
purging has
been
accomplished
(e.g.,
pH meter,
conductance meter,
thermometer,
water probe) and/or dissolved oxygen
levels.
Additionally,
sample
collection shall include collection of free
phase product in a well
provided
the collection of free
product
is
not part of a
free
product recovery
test
(component #13).
Analytical
cost
(component #11)
is
not
included
in this
rate.
This rate
does
not apply
to more than
three dowrigradient
ground
water
samples collected for field
screening
(component
#6).
The
three downgradient
ground water
samples
wilt
be
sent to a certified
Iaboratoiy.
One collection event shall
be
allowed for
each media collected
at
a well
or receptor e.g., one ground-water and
one vapor sample,
both from
the basement of a building
adjacent to
a UST
site,
shall
be
considered
two
separate
sample collection
events.
Sampling
ground
water
in a monitoring well
for dissolved
oxygen
and obtaining
a
ground
water sample
for
BTEX, MtBE,
and RCRA
Metals shall all
be
one
sample
collection
event. Air orvapor samples
must
be
collected in
a
metal
cylinder. The
soil
sample collection
fee
is
included in the boring, screening,
or well
rate.
II.
ANALYSES
includes all
personnel, sample
containers, coolers,
ice,
equipment for
analysis
by
a
S.C.
certified
laboratory
and
reporting
of the
results
using
appropriate chain
of custody,
field
notes,
and
certificates of analysis
in
accordance
with
the
latest
RBCA,
Analytical
Methodology
for
Petroleum
Releases
document,
and
SW-846.
Chain
of custody
and field
notes
should
be
included
with the
final
report.
The
eight
(8)
oxygenates
are:
ethanol,
ethyl
tert-butyl
aTcohol
(ETBA),
ethyl
tert-butyl ether
(ETBE),
tert-amy! methyl ether
(TAME),
dilsopropy! ether (DIPE), tert-butyl formate
(TBF),
tert-butyl
alcohol
(TBA),
and
tert-amyl alcohol (TAA). The eight
(8)
RCRA metals
are:
arsenic,
barium,
cadmium,
chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium, and silver.
Rush analysis will
be
24
hour analysis
by
the laboratory,
with
written
results
provided
to
the
UST
project
manager
within
48
hours
of
sample
collection.
Mobilization may
not be
added to this
task.
May
15,
2001
Page
6
12.
AQUIF ER CFIARACTERIZATION
includes
all
personnel,
equipment,
and
materials
to
complete
a
pumping
test
or
slug
test,
record
and
report
all
data,
reduce
the
data,
and
summarize it
on
the
Departments
pumping test or slug test report forms.
Mobilization may
be added to
this
task
when
not
combined
with
other tasks
(see #4b above).
13.
FREE
PRODUCT
RECOVERY
RATE TEST includes
all
personnel,
equipment,
and
materials to
perlbrm
a
free
product
recovery,
bail
down,
or bail
out test,
calculate
the
free
product
recharge
rate
and true
thickness,
summarize
the
data
in
a
tabular
format,
and
discuss
the
results
in
a
succinct narrative.
Mobilization
may
be
added to this
task
where appropriate
(see #4b above).
14.
FATE/TRANSPORT
MODELING includes
all personnel,
equipment
or materials, and computer software
to
complete
fate
and
transport
modeling
of
petroleum
in
soil,
ground
water,
and
br
vapors
using
mathematical or
computer models,
as
appropriate.
Mobilization may
not be added to this
task.
A)
A
mathematical
mode! is one where calculations are completed
using either a hand
calculator or
a computer
spreadsheet and
the
final
output
solely results
in a
set
of
calculated
numbers
e.g.,
Domerilco,
MODFLOW,
or
AT
123D
output
in
tabular
data
or
a
computer
spread
sheet.
Calculation
of
several
chemicals
of
concern
using
the
same
model
e.g.,
Domenico
shall
be
considered
one model.
Calculation
for
several
exposure
pathways
in
the
same
medium
e.g.,
ground-water,
shall
be
considered
one
model
since only
a
distance
to
each
exposure
point would
change.
B)
A
computer
model
includes
any
computer software
and
the
calibration of
the
model
to
the
current
site
conditions
which
uses
an
iterative
or
complex
approach
to
solve
mathematical
expressions,
and
produces
computer
generated
input and
output
data
summaries,
figures,
or
charts to
interpret fate and
transport of chemicals of concern
through
a medium e.g..
DSS,
BIOPLUME
11,
BIOSCREEN.
Natural
attenuation
measuremcnts
and
calibration
to
existing
analytical data must
be included as
part ofthe modeling effort.
A
separate model will
be
allowed
for each
medium
if
a
separate
model
was
used e.g.,
using
AT
123D, SESOIL and
Box
models
for
ground
water,
soil,
and
vapors
would
be
three
models;
using
the
RBCA
tool
kit
that
calculates
so11,
ground
water,
and
vapors with a single entry of field or
laboratory
data would
be
one
computer
model.
Calculation
of
several chemicals of concern and! or calculation for
several
exposure
pathways
in the
same
medium
e.g.,
ground-water,
will
be
considered
one
computer model.
15.
TIER
I
RISK EVALUATION includes
all
personnel, equipment,
and
materials necessary to evaluate the
site
data
and
potential receptors
in
order to determine the most appropriate action in accordance with the
Departments
Risk-Based Corrective
Action
Guidance. Either a Tier I
OR a Tier
II evaluation (not
both
for the
same report)
shaft
be
requested. Mobilization may
not be added to this
task.
TIER
H
RISK EVALUATION includes
all
personnel,
equipment,
and
materials necessary to evaluate the
site
data
and
potential
receptors
in
order
to
determine
the
most
appropriate
action
for
the
site
in
atcordance
with
the
Department’s
Risk-Based
Corrective Action
Guidance.
Tier II evaluation
includes
all
Tier
I evaluation tasks.
Mobilization may
not be added to this task.
May
15,
2001
Page
7
16.
SUBSEQUENT SURVEY
includes
all
personnel, equipment, and materials
necessary
for
a person to
determine the location and
elevation of screening points and permanent wells
to
be
included
in
an existing
comprehensive survey.
A subsequent
survey
may
be performed
by
a South
Carolina certified
surveyor
or a
person trained in surveying procedures.
Mobilization may
be
added to
this task,
where
appropriate
(see #4b above).
17.
DISPOSAL
includes
all
personnel,
equipment,
and
materials
to
obtain
signatures
on
manifests,
load,
transport,
and treat wastewater,
free
product, and soil.
Only
one personnel mobilization
may
be
added
for this
task.
MI
disposal tasks (soil
and ground water)
shaH
occur at
the same time.
18.
MISCELLANEOUS includes all
tasks
or
items
net included
in any
of thedefined components which
shall
be
needed
on a site-specific
basis.
Actual expenditures
documented
by vendor receipts or employee rate
without
fringes
must
be submitted with the invoice, e.g.,
laboratory
invoice for
special
analytical
method,
rental
contract for
free
product
recovery equipment. All
costs for the environmental
contractor or any
subcontractor
must
be
preapproved.
Items will receive
no
markup or handling
fee other than item
19.
If
a
geologist
or
technician
will
oversee
a
task
and
is
not
associated
with
the
firm
or
company
conducting
the task,
a personnel mobilization for the geologist or technician
may
be
allowed.
19.
ASSESSMENT
REPORT/PROJECT
COORDINATION
includes
all
personnel,
equipment,
and
material
cost
to complete a report
documenting the data,
results,
and conclusions
of all
components
completed
during that
phase ofwork.
Also includes
all
personnel oversight and miscellaneous costs
assoe~atedwith
procuring subcontractors, coordination of the project to
incLude
disposaL of generated waste and off site
access,
verification of work,
communication
with
any
parties,
invoicing,
and
coordination
with
the
department.
The
sum of all
components
may
be
multiplied
by this percentage
and then
added to the total
for
a
Tier
II
Assessment
Report,
Monitoring
Report, or
Well
Abandonment
Report.
Any
report that
interprets the
geology or ground
water flow will
be
signed
and
sealed
by
a professional
geologist or
engineer licensed to
practice in the state of South
Carolina. Any
report
must be
submitted
by
a DHEC
certified
site
rehabilitation
contractor.
Mobilization
may not be added
to this task.
Ifthe
UST
owner or
operator and
the
site
environmental
contractor
have
a
familial
or financial reiationship, this
item
shall
not
be
allowed.
ATTACHMENT
9
EXCAVATION/TRANSPORTATION/DISPOSAIJBACKFILL
COSTS
Site
Excavation
Transportation
Disposal
E+T+D
Backfill
1
$
20.00
$
15.00
$
15.00
$
50.00
$
15.00
2
$
16.85
$
7.63
$
27.55
$
52.03
$
11.79
3
$
12.00
$
10.00
$
22.50
$
44.50
$
16.00
4
$
11.24
$
11.24
$
35.21
$
57.69
$
14.94
5
$
16.82
$
13.42
$
27.00
$
57.24
$
9.00
6
$
4.80
$
22.00
$
27.00
$
53.80
$
15.00
7
$
9.75
$
10.00
$
22.25
$
42.00
8
$
51.00
$
18.50
9
$
49.86
$
15.71
10
$
50.00
$
16.00
11
$
10.00
$
15.00
$
21.00
$
46.00
$
18.00
12
$
15.00
$
8.00
$
12.00
$
35.00
13
$
2.75
$
18.50
$
20.00
$
41.25
$
19.90
14
$
11.00
$
4.29
$
8.60
$
23.89
$
6.90
15
$
12.00
$
13.00
$
25.00
$
so.oo
$
26.00
16
$
15.00
$
12.00
$
21.00
$
48.00
$
15.00
17
$
36.20
18
$
8.00
$
22.00
$
27.00
$
57.00
$
15.00
19
$
10.86
$
14.00
$
24.50
$
49.36
$
22.50
20
$
10.00
$
10.00
$
32.00
$
52.00
$
16.00
21
$
16.00
$
10.00
$
12.00
$
38.00
$
17.50
22
$
10.00
$
10.00
$
32.00
$
52.00
$
16.00
23
$
5.00
$
10.00
$
25.00
$
40.00
$
10.00
24
$
20.00
$
15.00
$
25.00
$
60.00
$
25.60
25
$
25.20
$
6.00
$
21.60
$
52.80
$
7.20
TOTAL
$262.27
$257.08
$483.21
$1189.62
$
349.54
Average
$
12.49
$
12.24
$
23.01
$
47.58
$
15.89
STO DEV
$
8.22
$
4.38
$
76.07
ATTACHMENT
10
Laboratory Analysis
Propsed
Chemical
Note
LAB
1
LAB 2
LAB 3
LAB 4
LAB
5
Average
Rate
Arsenic TCLP Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
85.75
$
115.75
$
85.00
$
93.70
$
115.75
Arsenic Total Soil
.
2
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
23.25
$
43.50
$
40.00
$
31.15
$
43.50
Arsenic Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
23.25
$
33.50
$
34.00
$
27.95
$
34.00
Barium
TCLP
Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
78.00
$
107.75
$
72.00
$
87.95
$
112.00
Barium Total Soil
2
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
35.50
$
27.00
$
25.40
$
35.50
Barium Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
25.50
$
22.00
$
22.40
$
25.50
BETX
Soil with
MTBE (EPA 8260)
4
$
90.00
$
82.00
$
91.25
$
87.00
$
70.00
$
84.05
$
91.25
BETX
-
Water with
MTBE (EPA 8260)
4
$
90.00
$
70.00
$
85.00
$
87.00
$
70.00
$
80.40
$
90.00
BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand)
$
24.00
$
18.00
$
42.00
$
36.00
$
28.00
$
29.60
$
42.00
Cadmium TCLP
Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
85.75
$
115.75
$
85.00
$
93.70
$
115.75
Cadmium
Total Soil
2
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
23.25
$
43.50
$
40.00
$
31.15
$
43.50
Cadmium Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
23.25
$
33.50
$
34.00
$
27.95
$
34.00
Chromium TCLP
Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
78.00
$
107.75
$
72.00
$
87.95
$
112.00
Chromium Total Soil
2
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
35.50
$
27.00
$
25.40
$
35.50
Chromium Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
25.50
$
22.00
$
22.40
$
25.50
Corrosivity
$
12.00
$
10.00
$
13.00
$
15.50
$
20.00
$
14.10
$
20.00
Cyanide TCLP
Soil
1
$
130.00
$
80.00
$
101.00
$
123.00
$
95.00
$
105.80
$
130.00
Cyanide Total
Soil
$
30.00
$
35.00
$
38.50
$
30.75
$
35.00
$
33.85
$
38.50
Cyanide Water
$
30.00
$
35.00
$
38.50
$
30.75
$
35.00
$
33.85
$
38.50
Flash Point or
Ignitability Analysis EPA 1010
$
30.00
$
25.00
$
31.75
$
46.00
$
30.00
$
32.55
$
46.00
FOC
(Fraction Organic Carbon)
$
24.00
-
$
24.25
$
51.25
$
50.00
$
37.38
$
51.25
Fat, Oil,
& Grease (FOG)
$
36.00
$
50.00
$
100.00
$
61.50
$
50.00
$
59.50
$
100.00
Iron TCLP Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
78.00
$
107.75
$
72.00
$
87.95
$
112.00
Iron Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
25.50
$
22.00
$
22.40
$
25.50
Lead TCLP Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
86.00
$
115.75
$
85.00
$
93.75
$
115.75
Lead Total Soil
2
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
23.50
$
43.50
$
40.00
$
31.20
$
43.50
Lead Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
23.50
$
33.50
$
35.00
$
28.20
$
35.00
LUST (Priority)
Pollutants Soil
5
$
660.00
$
710.00
$
656.25
$
711.75
$
725.00
$
692.60
$
725.00
Mercury TCLP
Soil
1
$
130.00
$
70.00
$
86.00
$
115.75
$
85.00
$
97.35
$
130.00
Mercury Total Soil
$
30.00
$
25.00
$
23.50
$
23.50
$
25.00
$
25.40
$
30.00
Mercury Water
$
30.00
$
25.00
$
23.50
$
23.50
$
25.00
$
25.40
$
30.00
Metals TCLP
Soil (a combination of all
metals) RCRA
6
$
226.00
$
175.00
$
178.50
$
240.75
$
217.00
$
207.45
$
240.75
Metals Total Soil
(a combination of all
metals) RCRA
6
$
126.00
$
130.00
$
116.00
$
148.50
$
172.00
$
138.50
$
172.00
Metals Water (a combination
of all
metals) RCRA
6
$
126.00
$
130.00
$
1 i&OO
$
148.50
$
167.00
$
137.50
$
167.00
Laboratory Analysis
$
$
$
$
$
$
18.25
$
255.00
$
12.50
$
105.00
$
350.00
$
140.00
$
35.00
$
255.00
$
12.50
$
105.00
$
350.00
$
150.00
Note
LAB
1
LAB 2
LAB
3
LAB 4
LAB 5
Chemical
Average
Rate
Organic Carbon (ASTM-D 2974-87)
$
24.00
-
$
24.25
$
50.00
$
32.75
$
50.00
Oxygen (Dissolved)
$
24.00
-
$
13.00
$
36.00
$
20.00
$
23.25
$
36.00
Paint Filter (Free Liquids)
$
12.00
$
10.00
$
13.00
$
15.50
$
15.00
$
13.10
$
15.50
PCB/Pesticides (combination)
$
180.00
$
240.00
$
212.75
$
225.00
$
250.00
$
221.55
$
250.00
PCBs
$
120.00
$
100.00
$
90.25
$
92.25
$
150.00
$
110.50
$
150.00
Pesticides
$
120.00
$
140.00
$
122.50
$
138.25
$
175.00
$
139.15
$
175.00
pH
$
12.00
$
10.00
$
13.00
$
15.50
$
15.00
$
13.10
$
15.50
phenol
$
30.00
$
25.00
$
39.75
$
36.00
$
35.00
$
33.15
$
39.75
Poly Nuclear Aromatics PNA, or PAH SOIL EPA
8270
7
$
150.00
$
210.00
$
126.00
$
138.25
$
135.00
$
151.85
$
210.00
Poly Nuclear Aromatics
PNA, or PAH WATER EPA 8270
7
$
150.00
$
210.00
$
126.00
$
138.25
$
135.00
$
151.85
$
210.00
Reactivity
$
60.00
$
65.00
$
78.00
$
66.75
$
70.00
$
67.95
$
78.00
Selenium TCLP
Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
86.00
$
115.75
$
85.00
$
93.75
$
115.75
Selenium Total Soil
2
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
23.50
$
43.50
$
40.00
$
31.20
$
43.50
Selenium Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
25.50
$
35.00
$
25.00
$
35.00
Silver TCLP Soil
1
$
112.00
$
70.00
$
78.00
$
107.75
$
72.00
$
87.95
$ 112.00
Silver Total
Soil
2
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
35.50
$
27.00
$
25.40
$
35.50
Silver Water
3
$
24.00
$
25.00
$
15.50
$
25.50
$
22.00
$
22.40
$
25.50
SVOC
-
Soil (Semi Volatile Organic Compounds)
$
300.00
$
350.00
$
281.25
$
307.50
$
325.00
$
312.75
$
350.00
SVOC
-
Water (Semi Volatile Organic Compounds)
$
300.00
$
350.00
$
281.25
$
307.50
$
325.00
$
312.75
$
350.00
TKN (Total
Kjeldahl)
“nitrogen”
$
48.00
$
35.00
$
38.50
$
56.00
$
40.00
$
43.50
$
56.00
TOC (Total Organic Carbon)
EPA 9060A
$
30.00
$
25.00
$
33.00
$
36.00
$
30.00
$
30.80
$
36.00
TPH (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons)
8
$
100.00
$
160.00
$
87.50
$
102.50
$
160.00
$
122.00
$
160.00
VOC (Volatile Organic Compound)
-
Soil (Non-Aqueous)
$
180.00
$
192.00
$
170.00
$
179.50
$
150.00
$
174.30
$
192.00
VOC (Volatile
Organic Compound)
-
Water
$
180.00
$
180.00
$
154.50
$
179.25
$
150.00
$
168.75
$
180.00
Waste Characterization (Landfill Analysis)
9
Geo-Technical
Bulk DensityASTM D4292
I
D2937
$
12.00
$
35.00
$
21.75
Ex-Situ Hydraulic Conductivity / Permeability
-
$
255.00
Moisture ContentASTM
D2216-90/D4643-87
12.00
$
10.00
$
11.50
Porosity
-
$
105.00
Rock Hydraulic Conductivity Ex-situ
-
$
350.00
Sieve / Particle Size Analysis ASTM 0422-63
I
01140-54
-
$
150.00
$
145.00
Soil Classification
ASTM
02488-90 / 02487-90
Laboratory Analysis
Propsed
Chemical
Note
LAB
1
LAB
2
LAB 3
LAB 4
LAB
5
Average
Rate
Dry
Weight Reporting (per sample)
10
$
10.00
$
12.50
$
8.00
$
10.00
$
10.13
$
12.50
Turnaround Surcharge
11
4
Day
5Q
25
25
25,
31
50
3
Day
50
100
50
50
50
60
100
2Day
100
100
100
75
100
95
100
1 Day
100
100
125
100
200
125
200
Note
1:
Price incudes preparation at the
rate of
$
100.00
$
62.50
$
92.25
$
60.00
$
78.69
$
100.00
Note
2: Price incudes preparation at the
rate of:
$
12.00
$
20.00
$
15.00
$
15.67
$
20.00
Note
3: Price incudes preparation at the rate of:
$
12.00
$
10.00
$
10.00
$
10.67
$
12.00
Note
4: BTEX by method 8021
approved but not listed
Note
5: Volatiles, semivolitiles, pesticides and PCBs
Note
6:
Seven LUST Metals including
all Preps
Note
7:
PNAs by 8310 approved
by not listed
Note
8: TPH includes GRO and DRO
Note
9:
Specific analyses not defined
Note
10:
Only applys to soil samples
Note
11:
Normal TAT is
5-7 work days
ATTACHMENT
11
TCLP
IN SOILS
LAB
PREP
USED
IN
AMOUNT
USED IN
CONSTITUENT
MAX
FEE
RULE
ALLOWED
RULE
Arsenic
$93.70
:
—
$79.00
$15.01
$16.00
Barium
$87.95
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
Cadmium
$93.70
—
$78.69
$79.00
$15.01
$16.00
Chromium
$87.95
—
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
Cyanide
$105.80
$78.69
$79.00
$27.11
$28.00
Iron
$87.95
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
Lead
$93.75
:
$78.69
$79.00
$15.06
$16.00
Mercury
$97.35
$78.69
$79.00
$18.66
$19.00
Selenium
$93.75
—
$78.69
$79.00
$15.06
$16.00
Silver
$87.95
$78.69
$79.00
$9.26
$10.00
TOTAL IN SOILS
LAB
PREP
USED IN
AMOUNT
USED
IN
CONSTITUENT
MAX
FEE
RULE
ALLOWED
RULE
Arsenic
$31.15
:
—
$15.67
$16.00
$15.48
$16.00
Barium
$25.40
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
Cadmium
$31.15
—
$15.67
$16.00
$15.48
$16.00
Chromium
$25.40
—
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
Cyanide
$33.85
—
$0.00
$33.85
$34.00
lron*
$31.15
$15.67
$16.00
$15.48
$16.00
Lead
$31.20
$15.67
$16.00
$15.53
$16.00
Mercury
$25.40
—
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
Selenium
$31.20
—
$15.67
$16.00
$15.53
$16.00
SHyer
$25.40
$15.67
$16.00
$9.73
$10.00
TOTAL IN WATER
LAB
PREP
USED IN
AMOUNT
USED
IN
CONSTITUENT
MAX
PEE
RULE
ALLOWED
RULE
Arsenic
$27.95
:
$10.67
$11.00
$17.28
$18.00
Barium
$22.40
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
Cadmium
$27.95
$10.67
$11.00
$17.28
$18.00
Chromium
$22.40
—
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
Cyanide
$33.85
$0.00
$0.00
$33.85
$34.00
Iron
$22.40
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
Lead
$28.20
:
$10.67
$11.00
$17.53
$18.00
Mercury
$25.40
$0.00
$0.00
$25.40
$26.00
Selenium
$25.00
—
—
$10.67
$11.00
$14.33
$15.00
Silver
$22.40
$10.67
$11.00
$11.73
$12.00
—
iron Total Soil assumed from other metals
ATTACHMENT
12
AVERAGE $/HOUR COST
PERSONNEL
SITE
20&45 DAY
HOURS
OVERSIGHT
HOURS
1
48,500.00
$7,200.00
100
2
$12,360.00
138
$4,550.00
63
3
$12,342.00
164.5
$6,652.50
120.5
4
$3,760.00
54
$2,250.00
25
5
$12,059.00
148.4
6
$5,122.75
64.75
$4,198.15
65
7
$2,685.00
43
$975.00
13
8
$1,250.00
25
$1,700.00
34
9
$3,200.00
42
$2,287.50
30.5
10
$3,722.70
50
$2,870.00
41
11
$7,257.00
90
$13,167.00
151
12
-$6,625.00
-$6,270.00
13
$8,377.50
103.5
$7,600.00
80
14
$6,320.00
78
$800.00
10
15
$2,195.00
35
16
$4,044.75
48.5
17
$3,800.00
53
$8,236.00
96
18
$3,439.50
45.5
19
$2,205.75
29.5
$740.00
9
TOTAL
$79,035.95
1212.65
$56,956.15
838
AVERAGE
$4,649.17
71 .33235
$3,797.08
55.86667
AVERAGE $/HOUR
=
$65.18
AVERAGE $)HOUR
=
$67.97
I
I
INCLUDES UST REMOVAL OVERSIGHT
AMOUNTS NOT INCLUDED
(# OF HOURS UNKNOWN)
ATTACHMENT
13
METHOD
1
AND
2 SITE INVESTIGATIONS
PERSONNEL COSTS
16
7
8
19
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
$
12,370.00
$16,050.00
$ 11,540.00
$
6,624.00
$11,425.00
$
9,760.00
$11,835.00
$
9,760.00
$
2,800.00
$
6,660.00
$
3,310.00
$10,455.00
$11,350.00
$13,080.00
$14,890.00
$
6,140.00
$
6,736.00
r$
13,165.00
$10,992.00
$
3,830.00
$
3,830.00
~ $13,165.00
$
5,600.00
$13,465.00
$10,675.00
$
9,770.00
$12,590.00
$
9,440.00
$10,795.00
$14,650.00
$
9,975.00
$
9,130.00
~~SLk~ ~QkxcL
Notary Public
‘JLPU.
BRENDA
BOEHNER
NOTARY
PUBLIC,
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
:~MYCOMMISSION
EXPIRES
1l.I4.2~5
SITE#
Personnel
I
I
27
28
AVEItAGE
$
9,870.53
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
)
COUNTY OF SANGAMON)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached Errata Sheet and
Prefiled
Testimony ofDoug Clay. Hemando Albarracin, Doug Oakley, Brian Bauer and Harry Chap~p~
on
behalfofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Agency upon the person to whom it is directed, by
placing
a copy in an envelope addressed
to:
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Pollution
Control Board
James R.
Thompson Center
100 West Randolph St., Ste .11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Overnight Mail)
See Attached Service List
and mailing it from Springfield, Illinois on
Marie
Tipsord, Hearing Officer
Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W.
Randolph, Ste 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(Overnight Mail)
,~
Q~
7
:~
OFFICIAL
SEAL
•~
BRENDA BOENNER
NOTARY
PUBLIC,
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
:~
:~MYCOMMISSION
EXPJRES
J1-14-2QO5•~•
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER~”
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
this
c5
day of______
/
2
o~
~
~
Notary
Public
Hodge
Dwyer Zeman
3150
Roland Avenue
Springfield
217/523-4900
IL
62705-
2 17/523-4948
Interested
Party
Post Office
Box
5776
5776
Thomas
C.
Safley
Sidley Austin
Brown
& Wood
Bank One
Plaza
Chicago
312/853-7000
Interested
Party
10
South
Dearborn
Street
IL
60603
312/953-7036
William
G.
Dickett
K~r~anis
& White,
Ltd.
414
North Orleans Street
Chicago
312/836-1177
Interested
Party
Suite
810
IL
60610
312/836-9083
Barbara Magel
Illinois
Petroleum
Marketers
Association
112
West Cook
Street
Springfield
217/793-1858
IL
62704
Interested
Party
Bill Fle~schi
Woodlawn
United
Science Industries, Inc.
P.O.
Box
360
IL
62898-
618/735-2411
618/735-2907
Interested
Party
6295
East Illinois
Highway 15
0360
Joe
Kelly,
PE
Illinois
Environmental
Reciulatorv
Grour
3150
Roland Avenue
Springfield
217/523-4942
IL
62703
217/523-4948
Interested
Party
Robert A.
Messina,
General
Counsel
Carlson
Environmental, Inc.
65
E.
Wacker
Place
Chicago
Interested
Party
Suite
1500
IL
60601
Kenneth James
Chemical Industry Council
of Illinois
9801
W. Higgins
Road
Rosemont
Interested
Party
Suite 480
IL
60018
Lisa
Frede
Ra~sEngineering & Api~lied
Springfield
217/787-2118
821
South
Durkin
Drive
Science
IL
62791-
P.O.
Box
7349
217/787-6641
Interested
Party
7349
Michael
W. Rapps
Office of the Attorney
General
Environmental
Bureau
Chicago
312/814-2550
Interested
Party
188
West
Randolph,
20th
Floor
IL
60601
312/814-2347
Joel
J.
Sternstein, Assistant Attorney Genera
Matthew
J.
Dunn,
Division Chief
Herlacher An~leton
Associates.
LLC
Waterloo
618/935-2262
8731
Bluff Road
Interested
Party
IL
62298
618/935-2694
Tom
1-terlacher,
P.E.,
Prinapal Engineer
Illinois Pollution
Control
Board
100
W. Randolph
St.
Chicago
3128143956
Interested
Party
Suite
11-500
IL
60601
Dorothy
M.
Gunn, Clerk of the
Board
Marie Tipsord,
Hearing
Officer
Huff &
Huff, Inc.
512
West
Burlington Avenue
LaGrange
Interested
Party
Suite
100
IL
60525
James
E. Huff,
P.E.
Black
& Veatch
101
North
Wacker Drive
Chicago
Interested
Party
Suite
1100
IL
60606
Scott Anderson
Marlin Environmental.
Inc.
South
Elgin
847-468-8855
1000
West Spring
Street
Interested
Party
IL
60177
Melanie
LoPiccolo,
Office
Manager
J~j~y
R.
Walton
Decatur
2510
Brooks
Drive
217-428-6782
Interested
Party
IL
62521
Harry Walton
Ieii~con
870
40th
Avenue
Bettendorf
(563) 355-
Interested
Party
IA
52722
0702
Brian
Porter
Illinois
DeiDartment of Natural
Springfield
Resources
One
Natural
Resources
Way
IL
72702-
217/782-1809
217/524-9640
Interested
Party
1271
Jonathan
Furr, General
Counsel
Wendler EnQineerinci
Services,
Inc.
Sycamore
1770 West State
Street
815-895-5008
Interested
Party
IL
60178
Glen
Lee,
Manager
Great Lakes
Analytical
Buffalo
Grove
(847) 808-
1380
Busch
Parkway
Interested
Party
IL
60089
7766
AJ
Pavlick
CSD Environmental
Services,
Inc
Springfield
2220 Yale
Boulevard
217-522-4085
Interested
Party
IL
62703
Joseph
W. Truesdale, P.E.
McGuireWoods
LLP
77
W. Wacker
Drive
Chicago
312-849-8249
Interested
Party
IL
60601
David
L.
Rieser,
Partner
Downers
Clayton
Group
Services Inc
3140
Finley Road
Grove
630.795.3207
Interested
Party
IL
60515
Monte
Nienkerk
PDC Laboratories
Peoria
2231
W. Altorfer Dr.
309-692-9688
Interested
Party
ii
61615
Kurt Stepping,
Director of Client Services
Atweli-Hicks,
Inc.
940
East Diehi
Road
Naperville
630
5770800
Interested
Party
Sute
100
IL
60563
Thomas
M. Guist,
PE, Team
Leader
CW3M Company,
Inc.
701
South
Grand Ave.
West
Springfield
217-522-8001
Interested
Party
IL
62704
Jeff Wienhoff
United
Science Industries, Inc.
Woodlawn
618-735-2411
6295
East Illinois Hwy
15
IL
62898
e
Interested
Party
Dan King,
Team
Leader
Environmental
Consultincj &
551
Roosevelt
Road
Glenn
Ellyn
EnQineering.
Inc.
#309
IL
60137
Interested
Party
Richard Andros,
P.E.
MACTEC Engineering
& Consulting.
Peoria
Inc.
8901
N. Industrial
Road
IL
61615
Interested
Party
Terrence W.
Dixon,
PG.
Illinois
Department of
Springfield
Transportation
2300
Dirksen
Parkway
JL
62764
Interested
Party
Steven
Gobelman
SEECO Environmental Services,
Inc.
Tinley
Park
7350 Duvon
Drive
Interested
Party
IL
60477
Collin
W. Gray
Herlacher Angleton Associates,
LLC
Alton
522
Belle Street
Interested
Party
IL
62002
Jennifer Goodman
United
Environmental
Consultants,
119 East
Palatin
Road
Palatine
Ln~
Suite
101
IL
60067
Interested
Party
George
F.
Moncek
McGuire Woods
LLP
77
W. Wacker
Chicago
Interested
Party
Suite 4400
IL
60601
David
Rieser
Greensfelder,
Hemker & Gale
10
S.
Broadway
St. Louis
314-241-9090
Interested
Party
Suite 2000
MO
63104
Tina Archer,
Attorney
Midwest
Engineering
Services,
Inc.
Oak Forest
4243
W.
166th Street
708-535-9981
Interested
Party
IL
60452
Erin
Curley,
Env.
Department
Manager
American
Environmental Corr,.
3700
W. Grand Ave., Suite
A
Springfield
(217) 585-
Interested
Party
IL
62707
9517
Ken
Miller, Regional Manager
Applied
Environmental
Solutions,
Centralia
6185335953
Inc.
P08ox1225
IL
62801
Interested
Party
Russ
Goodiel,
Project
Manager
Secor International,
Inc.
400
Bruns
Lane
Springfield
Interested
Party
IL
62702
Daniel J.
Goodwin
