GOVERNOR
Rod R Blagojevich
CHAIRMAN
I Philip Novak
+
~PRINGFIELD OFFICE
~IO21NorthGrand~
East
P.O. Box 19274
Spi~ngfie1d,IL
62794-9274
217-524-8500
FAX.217-524-8508
CHICAGO OFFICE
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
312-814-3620
FAX 3.12-814-3669
TYY 312-814-6032
Jack Lavin, Director
Department ofCommerce and Economic Opportunity
620 East Adams Street, S-6
Springfield, Illinois 62704
Re:
Request for Economic Impact Study for:
Proposed Amendments to
Regulation of Petroleum Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (35111. Adm.
Code 732) and Regulation of Petroleum Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
(Proposed new
35
Iii. Adm. Code 734) (Consolidated: R04-22 and R04-23)
Dear Director Lavin:
The Pollution Control Board (Board) received a rulemaking proposal on
January 13, 2004, filed by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) to
amend Part 732 and to add a new Part 734. The proposal seeks to amend the Board’s
petroleum leaking underground storage tanks rules. I am writing to request that you
determine whether your Department will conduct an economic impact study
concerning this proposal
Since 1998, Section 27 (b) ofthe Environmental Protection Act has required
the Board to:
1) “request that the Department ofCommerce and Economic Opportunity
(formerlythe Department ofCommerce and Community Affairs) conduct a
study ofthe economic impact ofthe proposed rules. The Department may
within 30 to
45
days ofsuch request produce a study ofthe economic impact
ofthe proposed rules. At a minimum, the economic impact study shall
address a) economic, environmental, and public health benefits that may be
achieved through compliance with the proposed rules, b) the effects of the
proposed rules on employment levels, commercial productivity, the economic
growth ofsmall businesses with 100 or less employees, and the State’s
overall economy, and c) the cost per unit ofpollution reduced and the
variability ofcompany revenues expected to be used to implement the
proposed rules; and
(2) conduct at least one public hearing on the economic impact ofthose
rules. At least 20 days before the hearing, the Board shall notif~’the public of
the hearing and make the economic impact study, or the Department of
Commerce and Economic Opportunity’s explanation for not producing an
economic impact study, available to the public. Such public hearing may be
WEB SITE
wwwipcb.staieil us
ri)
i,’~
w
)(~(~
February 17, 2004
FEE~I C 20Q4
1~VE.D
STATE OF ~LUNOj~
POllUtIOn Control 6oar~
held simultaneously or as a part ofany Board hearing considering such new
rules.”
415
JLCS
5/27(b)
(2002).
The Board has already scheduled hearing dates for this rulemaking proposal:
March
15,
2004 and May
25,
2004. I would greatly appreciate a response from you
concerning DCEO’s position on whether it will perform the economic impact study
as soon as is possible.
The Board anticipates a high volume ofrulemaking in the coming year. Your
Department can anticipate receiving many requests for economic studies this year. A
review ofthe Department’s files will reveal to you that DCEO has not conducted any
economic studies since 1998 due to fiscal constraints. I am aware ofthe
Department’s April 2003 letter indicating that it would not be performing studies of
this nature in response to any current or future requests, but I note that nearly 12
months have passed since that time. A review ofBoard rulemaking opinions and
orders since then would reveal that the Department’s decision not to perform
economic impact studies has not been questioned at any Board hearing.
If I, or my staff, can provide you with any additional information, please let
me know. While the Board can proceed to hold hearings while awaiting your
decision, the Environmental Protection Act does not allow the Board to complete its
rulemaking process without your Department’s input.
Thank you for your earlyresponse.
Sincerely,
J. Philip Novak
Chairman, Pollution Control Board
Cc: Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Erin Conley, Rules Coordinator