1. See Attached.
      2. See Attached.
      3. See Attached.
      4. See Attached.
      5. See Attached.
      6. See Attached.
      7. Respectfully submitted,
      8. MILLER & FERGUSON
      9. CLERK’S OFFICE
      10. INTERROGATORIES
      11. b. Gregory V. Miller
      12. Miller & Ferguson, Attorneys at Law
      13. 9415 South State Street, Chicago, IL 60619
      14. c. Interrogatories 3, 9 and 18
      15. None.
      16. Ltd) 9415 S. State
      17. None,
      18. None.
      19. ANSWER:
      20. a. The limited partnership was created on or about April, 2000 inIllinois.
      21. partner. The percentage of ownership is .OO1 and .99respectively.
      22. c. The partners became partners in the partnership at its inception.
      23. ANSWER:
      24.  
      25. The site was owned by Respondent during the period in question.
      26. ANSWER:
      27. The Respondent was the only owner of site during theperiod in question.
      28. site.
      29. None.
      30. ANSWER:
      31. None.
      32. None.
      33. None.
      34. ANSWER:
      35. to Complainant pursuant to its production request.
      36. MILLER & FERGUSON
  1. Verification

RECE1V~D
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
CLERK’S OFFICE
JAN
1
6
2004
PEOPLE OF THE STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
J
STATE OF
ILIJNOIS
I
Pollution
Control Board
Complainant,
)
I
vs.
No. 04-7
(Enforcement-Air)
4832
5. \‘INCENNES,
L.P., an Illinois limited
J
partnership, and BATTEAST
CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Indiana
)
Corporation,
J
I
Respondents.
ANSWERS TO COMPLAINANT’S
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
OF
DOCUMENTS,
OBJECTS, ANDTANGIBLE THINGS ON RESPONDENT,
4832 S. VINCENNES, L.P.
Respondent, 4832
5. Vincennes, L.P. (VINCENNES), pursuant to Section
101.616 of the
Board’s Procedural Regulations, Hearing Officer Order dated October 21, 2003 and Illinois
Supreme Court Rule 213, answers Complainant’s First Request for Production of Documents,
Objects and Tangible Things as follows:
I.
REQUESTS
1.
All
documents that Respondents referred to, identified or relied upon in
responding to Complainant’s First Set of Interrogatories to Respondents.
See Attached.
2.
All documents that Respondents referred to, identified
or relied upon in
answering Complainant’s amended complaint.
See Attached.
3.
All
documents reflecting or relating to any environmental inspection and/or
environmental audit of the subject site within the past 3 years.
See Attached.
4.
All
statements, notes and correspondence obtained from any i~erson(s)
with
knowledge
of the subject matter of the Complainant’s amended complaint.
None.
5.
Respondents’ Federal and State income tax returns, including schedules for the
years 2001, 2002 and 2003.
See Attached.

6.
The most recent audit made of the financial condition of the Respondents.
See Attached.
7.
All documents that:
a.
reflect a business agreement or contract between \‘INCENNES and any
other party forrenovation andfor the removal
of asbestos containing
material at any location on the site; or for demolition of any structure on
the site;
b.
any modifications thereto;
See Attached.
8.
All drawings, studies, schematics, maps, plans, blueprints
or charts depicting the
site or illustrating any plans for its development, use or operation.
See Attached.
9.
All documents relating to the testing or characterization
of potentially asbestos-
containing material at the site during the years
2001 through the present date.
See Attached.
10.
ALl written notifications submitted to the Illinois EPA for asbestos renovation or
demotion projects scheduled to occur at the site fromJanuary
1, 2001 through
the present date.
See Attached.
11.
All
documents reflecting or relating to the removal, transfer or disposal of any
and all waste from the site during the periodJanuary 1,
2001 through the preseflt date.
See Attached.
12.
All documents reflecting or relating to any inspection
ancL”or environmental
audit
of the site
by
any person during the period 2001 through the present date.
See Attached.
13.
Any photographs
of the site or any portion thereof obtained
clu ring the period
January
1, 1995 through the present date.
See Attached.

14.
All documents VINCENNES intends to offer into evidence at trial.
See Attached.
Respectfully submitted,
MILLER & FERGUSON
By~2~~
,4.
~
One of its 4$rneys
/
Miller& Ferguson, #91662
9415 South State Street
Chicago, Illinois 60619
(773) 660-4300
3

RECE~VED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
JAN
162004
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control
Board
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
I
I
Complainant,
I
I
vs.
I
No. 04-7
(Enforcement-Air)
4832
S. VINCENNES,
L.P., an Illinois limited
partnership, and BATTEAST
CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Indiana
3
Corporation,
I
Respondents.
I
ANSWERS TO COMPLAINANT’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES ON
RESPONDENT,
4832 S. VINCENNES, L.P.
Respondent, 4832
S. Vincennes,
L.P.
(VINCENNES), pursuant to
Section
101.616 of the
Board’s
Procedural
Regulations,
Hearing
Officer
Order
dated
October
21,
2003
and
Illinois
Supreme Court
Rule 213,
answers Complainant’s First Set
of Interrogatories as
follows:
INTERROGATORIES
1.
Please identify:
a.
The
individual(s)
answering
these
interrogatories
on
behalf
of
the
Respondent, including his or her relationship to Respondent, and how long
he or she has been associated with Respondent.
b.
Each
person
who
provided
information
or
who
otherwise
consulted,
participated
or
assisted
in
connection
with
providling
answers
to
these
interrogatories,
the nature of
any such
consultation
or
assistance, whether
the information was based on personal knowledge,
and if not on the basis
of
personal knowledge, on what basis
it
was provided.
c.
For each person identified in Answer to Interrogatories
No.
1(b), specify the
particular interrogatories
to which each such person
contributed.
ANSWER:
a.
Anthony Ferguson
President
Mayfair Development, Inc.
General Partner 4832
5. Vincennes,
L.P.
b.
Gregory V.
Miller
Miller & Ferguson, Attorneys at Law
9415 South State Street, Chicago, IL 60619
c.
Interrogatories 3, 9 and
18

2.
Identify the
name,
address, phone number,
occupation,
and
responsibifities
of
any and all person
having knowledge
of the operations at the site and/or the facts pertaining to
any possible open dumping or dumping outside of the permitted area and any of the factsalleged
in the Complaint filed in People v. 4832
S. Vincennes,
L.P. and Batteast Construction Company,
~
PCB
04-07.
Include any and
all
persons that
Respondents intend
to
call as witnesses at
hearing, including their relationship, if any, to each.
ANSWER:
None.
3.
Pursuant
to
Illinois
Supreme
Court
Rule
213(f),
with
respect
to
any hearing
\vitnesses, please state the following:
a.
The name, address and employer of each witness;
b.
A summary of the relevant facts within the knowledge
of
or which said
witnesses
will
testify to; and
c.
A listing of any documents or photographs, which any such witness has
relied upon, wifi use or which may introduce into evidence in connection
with the testimony of saidwitness.
ANSWER:
a.
Gregory
V.
Miller
(Sixteen
Hundred
Investment
Group,
Ltd)
9415
S.
State
Street, Chicago, Illinois; and
Patrick
Curtin
(Department
of
Housing)
318
5.
Michigan
Avenue,
Chicago,
Illinois
b.
Mr.
Miller
&
Mr.
Curtin
will
testify
as
to
when
Respondent
received
notification
from
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
of
the
environmental
hazards.
Mr.
Mifier
wifi
further
testify
as
the
actions
of
Respondent during the time periods stated in the subject complaint.
c.
Report
from
PGK
Environmental
Testing
&
Consulting
to
Batteast
Construction dated March 19, 2002.
4.
Furnish
the
identity
and
addresses
of
all
expert
witnesses
who will
testify at
trial for Respondents, together with the subject matter
on which each expert witness is expected
to
testify; the conclusions and opinions of each expert witness and
the
basis therefore; and the
qualifications of each expert witness and a copy of
all reports of such witnesses.
ANSWER:
None,

5.
With respect to any witness(es) interviewed
by
Respondents who Respondents
do not intend to call to
testify at hearing, state the name and address of any such witness, state
whether
a
transcript
of
any interview
with
said
witness
was
prepared,
or
a
memorandum
prepared
in
connection
with
any
such
interview,
and
provide
a
summary
of
the
facts
and
opinions relevant to this proceeding which were secured from saidwitness.
ANSWER:
None.
6.
Pursuant
to
Illinois
Supreme
Court
Rule
213(g),
identify
any and
all opinion
witnesses that Complainant have interviewed and/or expects to call at hearing.
Specify:
a.
The subject
matter
on which the opinion witness
is expected to testify
as
well
as
the
conclusions,
opinion
and/or
expected testimony
of
any
such witness;
b.
The
qualifications, including,
but
not
limited
to,
the
opinion
witness’
educational
background, practical
experience
in
the
area
he
or she
is
expected to testify in, any articles and papers he or she has written, any
and
all
seminars
and
post
graduate
training
he
has
received,
his
experience,
if
any,
as
a
teacher
or
lecturer
and
his
or
professional
appointments and associations;
c.
The identity
of each document examined, considered,
or relied upon by
him or her to form his or her opinions;
ci.
All proceedings
in which
each
opinion witness has
previously
testified
as an opinion witness; and
e.
Any and all reports of the opinion witness.
ANSWER:
None.
7.
‘With regard to VINCENNES, state:
a.
The date and state of formation;
b.
The
names
of
all
partners,
limited
and
general of
the
partnership,
the
percent ownership and the dates when they became partners;
c.
The relationship between the partners, if any.
3

ANSWER:
a.
The
limited
partnership
was
created
on
or
about
April,
2000
in
Illinois.
b.
4832
S.
Vincennes,
L.P.
consists
of
Mayfair
Development,
Inc.,
as
general partner and Apollo Housing Group, LLP
(Apollo)
as limited
partner.
The
percentage
of
ownership
is
.OO1
and
.99
respectively.
c.
The partners became partners in the partnership at its inception.
8.
Describe
the nature of the relationship between VINCENNES and BATTEAST
from August 1,
2001 to the present.
ANSWER:
Batteast
Construction was
hired
by the
Respondent
as the
general contractor for
the rehabilitation work performed on 4832
S. Vincennes, Chicago, Illinois.
9.
Please describe any conversations with Iffinois EPA personnel by agents
of the
Respondents,
especially
those
with
Joe
Zappa
between
the
dates
on January
31,
2002
and
February 5, 2002, including the time, date, place, who was
present, what was said, and whether
any written notes
or memoranda exist relating to the conversation.
ANSWER:
Joe
Zappa left
several
telephone
messages
during
the
period
stated
for
Gregory
Miller.
These
messages left
a return telephone number
that was a cellular phone number.
There was no office number given.
There was a telephone conversationbetween
Mr. Zappa
and
Mr.
Miller
during
that
period
in
which
Mr.
Zappa
informed
Mr.
Miller
of
the
environmental
conditions
stated
in
the
complaint.
During that
conversation,
Mr.
Miller
requested a written request to stop work or verification of Mr. Zappa’s identity.
10.
State
whether
from
August
1,
2001
through
the
present
date,
VINCENNES
operated,
occupied, used, maintained and/or controlled the site, and describe the nature of such
operation,
occupancy,
use
maintenance
and/or
control
and the
time
period(s)
corresponding
thereto.
ANSWER:
The site was owned by Respondent during the period in question.
11.
Identify
all
persons
and entities who
have owned,
operated,
occupied,
used,
maintained and/or controlled the site from August 1,
2001 through the present date, and describe
the
nature of
such
ownership, operation,
occupancy,
use,
maintenance and/or
control and
the
time period(s) corresponding thereto.
ANSWER:
4

The Respondent was the only owner of site during theperiod in question.
12.
Describe in
detail
any and
all uses of the site
during the period August
1,
2001
through the present date.
ANSWER:
The
subject
site
is
being
rehabilitated
by
Batteast
Construction,
Inc.
during the
period in question.
The scope of work is detailed in the scope of work from NIA Architects.
13.
Describe
in
detail
VINCENNES’
role
in
the
activities
at
the
site
that
are
the
subject matter
of the complaint herein, including
any contractual arrangements for renovation,
with
the
City or
BATTEAST,
VINCENNES’ supervision
of
or
participation in
any renovation
activity
at
the
site
from
August
1,
2001
through
the
present
date,
and
identify
any written
contract or agreement for the performance of such work.
ANSWER:
Respondent was and
is
the
owner
of said site
and
entered into
a
contract
for the
renovation of said site.
Respondent did
not participate or supervise the renovation of said
site.
14.
State
whether
\‘INCENNES,
its
agents
or
attorneys
have
knowledge
or
information concerning the
existence of any statements,
oral
or written,
not
in
VINCENNES’
possession that pertains in any
way
to the matters alleged in the amended complaint.
If so, state:
a.
The type of statement, e.g., ~vritten, reported, shorthand,
oral, recorded;
b.
The
full
name
and residence and business
address of each person who
provided the statement; and
c.
The
full
name and
residence and business
address
of
each person who
has possession of the original or anycopy of the statement.
ANSWER:
None.
15.
State
whether
any
photographs
were
taken
of
the
scene
of
the
occurrences
alleged in the amended complaint.
If so, state:
a.
By whom, when and how many photographs were taken;
b.
\‘\Tho now has possession
of said photographs; and
c.
The nature of the photographs.
ANSWER:
None.
5

16.
State
the
date
and
substance
of
all
written
and
oral
communications within
VINCENNES, to or from the Illinois
EPA, or to or from other persons,
regarding the subject
of
the
violations alleged
in the amended complaint other than stated in
Answer
No.
9.
Identify all
documents
containing
such
communications.
Identify
VINCENNES
personnel
and any other
persons involved in such communications.
ANSWER:
None.
17.
State
whether
VINCENNES,
or
any
person
or
entity
acting
on
behalf
of
\‘INCENNES,
confirmed
the
presence
of
asbestos
in
or
around
the
site
prior
to
the
commencement
of
the
asbestos
removal
activity
that
Complainant
alleges
commenced
in
February, 2002.
If your answer is in the affirmative, please identify or describe.
a.
The
locations
at
the
site
from
which
samples
were
obtained,
the
sampling methods
utilized, the parameters or contaminants
tested for,
and the results obtained.
Please attach a copy of all results;
b.
The testing method(s) by which the presence of asbestos was confirmed;
c.
The
laboratory
that
performed the
sampling
and
the
laboratory
that
performed the analysis; and
d.
All persons
or entities with knowledge
of the
sampling
and study and
the basis
of their knowledge.
ANSWER:
None.
18.
Identify any studies
or
evaluations
performed
from January
2001
through
the
present date
by,
or
for, VINCENNES
regarding the presence or
extent of asbestos at the site, or
any plan or recommendation for remediation of identified asbestos contamination.
Identify any
documents
relating
to
such
studies,
evaluations, plans
or
recommendations, and
any persons
having knowledge
of any facts of such studies, evaluations, plans or recommendations.
6

ANSWER:
The
Respondent
is
aware
of
and
is
in
possession
of
a
report
from
PGK
Environmental Testing & Consulting dated March 19, 2002.
Said report is being provided
to Complainant pursuant to its production request.
Respectfully submitted,
MILLER & FERGUSON
~
2~
R
One of its a(
rneys
/
Miller & Ferguson, #91662
9415 South
State Street
Chicago, Illinois 60619
(773) 660-4300
(

RECE
WED
CLERK’S OFFICE
JAN
162004
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Board

Back to top


Verification
I, Anthony B. Ferguson, being first
duly sworn on oath, deposes and states pursuant to
735
ILCS 5/1-109
that he is the above and foregoing Respondent and certifies that the statements
set forth
in
this instrument are
true
and
correct,
except
as
to
matters
therein
stated to
be on
information and belief and as to such matters
the undersigned certifies as aforesaid that he verily
believes the same to be true.
Anthony B. Fe~~on
/
Miller &
Ferguson, #91662
9415 South
State Street
Chicago, Illinois 60619
(773) 660-4300
8

Back to top