ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 27,
1992
WARREN’S SERVICE (Mercer County),
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 92—22
)
(Underground Storage
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
Tank Reimbursement)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J. Anderson):
On February
7,
1992,
Warren
Service
filed
a
petition
for
review of an Underground Storage Tank Reimbursement Determination
for its facility located at 3rd and 5th Streets in Mercer County,
Sherrard, Illinois.
A review of the correspondence filed to date
in this matter
indicates
there may be some confusion as to the
nature of a proceeding of this type before the Board.
In
proceedings
before
the
Board,
the
burden
is
upon
the
Petitioner to establish
at
a
formal hearing,
by oral testimony
under oath or by properly submitted written documents,
that the
disputed costs
should be paid under
the terms
of
the
Illinois
Environmental Protection Act, and applicable regulations.
So far,
Petitioner has not asserted reasons why such costs should have been
paid.
In order to prevail at hearing, the Petitioner must present
facts
and arguments
as to why those costs should be paid.
The
Board hearing is not an informal informational hearing at which the
Agency will explain its actions.
The hearing is more in the nature
of a court proceeding with testimony under oath and questions of
the witnesses.
This Board cannot provide
legal advice or legal
assistance to the Petitioner.
The Petitioner bears the burden of
providing information to support its position.
The initial burden
at hearing to explain why the costs were not paid is not upon the
Agency.
Hearing must be scheduled within 14 days of the date of this
Order and completed within 60 days of the date of this Order.
The
hearing officer shall inform the Clerk of the Board of the time and
location of the hearing at least 40 days in advance of hearing so
that public notice of hearing may be published.
After hearing, the
hearing
officer
shall
submit
an
exhibit
list,
and
all
actual
exhibits to the Board within
5 days of the hearing.
Any briefing
schedule
shall
provide
for
final
filings
as
expeditiously
as
possible and in no event later than 70 days from the date of this
Order.
2
If after appropriate consultation with the parties,
the
parties fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or if after an
attempt the hearing officer is unable to consult with the
parties, the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
date in conformance with the schedule above.
This schedule will
only provide the Board a very short time period to deliberate and
reach a decision before the due date.
The hearing officer and
the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as much as
possible.
Within 10 days of accepting this case, the Hearing Officer
shall enter a Hearing Officer Scheduling Order governing
completion of the record.
That Order shall set a date certain
for each aspect of the case including:
briefing schedule,
hearing date(s),
completion of discovery
(if necessary)
and pre-
hearing conference
(if necessary).
The Hearing Officer
Scheduling Order may be modified by entry of a complete new
scheduling order conforming with the time requirements below.
The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
waiver of the decision deadline by the petitioner and only for
the equivalent or fewer number of days that the decision deadline
is waived.
Such waivers must be provided in writing to the Clerk
of the Board.
Any waiver must be an “open waiver” or a waiver of
decision until a date certain.
Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the
petitioner provides an open waiver or a waiver to a date at least
120 days beyond the date of the motion to cancel hearing.
This
should allow ample time for the Board to republish notice of
hearing and receive transcripts from the hearing before the due
date.
Any order by the hearing officer granting cancellation of
hearing shall include a complete new scheduling order with a new
hearing date at least 40 days in the future and at least 30 days
prior to the new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall be
promptly informed of the new schedule.
Because this proceeding is the type for which the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act sets a very short statutory deadline
for making a decision, absent a waiver, the Board will grant
extensions or modifications only in unusual circumstances.
Any
such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
hearing, and final submissions, as well as the deadline for
decision, including response time to such a motion.
However, no
such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
establish a Scheduling Order pursuant to the requirements of this
Order,
and to adhere to that Order until modified.
This Order will not appear in the Board’s Opinion Volumes.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
B. Forcade dissented.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board
hereby certj~ythat the above Order was adopted on )the
7~day of
_________________,
1992, by a vote of
~,—/
Dorothy M. ~inn, Clerk
Illinois Po~lutionControl Board