1. BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      2. OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
      3. NOTICE
      4. RECEiVED
      5. OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
      6. • STATE OF IWNOIS
      7. REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION
      8. OF APPEAL PERIOD
      9. Re: Reimbursement Decision Appeal
      10. LFC #0310515095—Cook CountyCicero/Clearing Disposal
      11. LUST FISCAL FILE
      12. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
F. Thomas DePaul
DAI Environmental
Polo Park Business Center
27834 North Irma Lee Circle
Lake Forest, IL
60045-5
130
D
CLERK’S OFP1C~
OCT 2 32003
STATE OF IWNOIS
Pollution
Control
Board
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: October 21, 2003
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
CLEARING DISPOSAL,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
)
Respondent.
)
PCB No. 04-
1
(UST Fund
Ninety Day Extension)
NOTICE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed ~viththe office of the Clerk of the Pollution
Control Board a REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION OF APPEAL PERIOD, copies of which
are herewith served upon you.

RECEiVED
CLERK’S
OFFICE
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OCT 23 2003
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
STATE OF IWNOIS
CLEARING
DISPOSAL,
)
Pollution Control Board
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB No. 04-
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
(UST Fund
Ninety Day Extension)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
)
REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION
OF APPEAL PERIOD
NOW COMES the Respondent, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois
EPA”), by one of its attorneys, John J. Kim, Assistant Counsel and Special Assistant Attorney
General, and, pursuant to Section 40(a)(1) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (415
ILCS 5/40(a)(1)) and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 105.208, hereby requests that the Illinois Pollution
Control Board (“Board”) grant an extension ofthe thirty-five
(35)
day period for petitioning for a
hearing to January 22, 2004, or any other date not more than a total of one hundred twenty-five
(125) days from September 19, 2003, the date of the Illinois EPA’s final decision. In support
thereof, the Illinois EPA respectfully states as follows:
1.
On September 19, 2003, the Illinois EPA issued a final decision to the Petitioner.
(Exhibit A)
2.
On October 20, 2003, the Petitioner made a written request to the Illinois EPA for
an extension of time by which to file a petition for review, asking the Illinois EPA join in
requesting that the Board extend the thirty-five day period for filing a petition to ninety days.
The Petitioner did not represent when the final decision was received. (Exhibit B)
3.
The additional time requested by the parties may eliminate the need for a hearing
in this matter or, in the alternative, allow the parties to identify issues and limit the scope ofany
hearing that may be necessary to resolve this matter.
1

WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, the parties request that the Board, in the
interest of administrative and judicial economy, grant this request for a ninety-day extension of
the thirty-five day period f9r petitioning for a hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent
John
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: October 21, 2003
This filing submitted on recycled paper.
2

• 7_’
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1021 NoRTH GRAND AVENUE EAST,
P.O. Box 19276, SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794-9276, 217-782-3397
JAMES R. THOMPSON CENTER, 100 WEST RANDOLPH, SUITE
11-300,
CHICAGO,
IL 60601, 312-814-6026
ROD
R.
BLAGOJEVICH, GOVERNOR
RENEE CIPRIANO, DIRECTOR
217/782-6762
SEP 19 2003
Waste Management ofIllinois, Inc.
Attention: Mike Tunney
3800 South Laramie Avenue
Cicero, IL 60804
Re:
LPC#0310515095--CookCounty
Cicero/Clearing Disposal
3800 South Laramie
LUST Incident #89 1673
-
LUST FISCAL FILE
Dear Mr. Tunney:
The Agency has completed the review ofthe request for reimbursement ofcorrective action costs
from the Illinois Underground Storage Tank Fund for the above-referenced facility. The invoices
reviewed covered the period from June 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003. The amount requested was
$26,858.92.
The deductible amount for this claim is $10,000.00, which was previously deducted from the
Invoice Voucher dated June 7, 2002. Listed in Attachment A are the costs which are not being
reimbursed from this request and the reasons these costs are not being reimbursed.
On May 29, 2003, the Agency received your complete request for payment forthis claim. As a
result ofthe Agency’s review ofthis claim, a voucher for $11,088.06 will be prepared for
submission to the Comptroller’s Office for payment as funds become available based upon the
date the Agency received your complete request for payment of this claim. Subsequent claims
that have been/are submitted will be processed based upon the date complete subsequent billings
requests are received by the Agency.
This constitutes the Agency’s final action with regard to the above invoices. An underground
storage tank owner or operator may appeal this final decision to the Illinois Pollution Control
Board (Board) pursuant to Section 22.1 8b(g) and Section 40 of the Act by filing a petition for a
hearing within 35 days after the date of issuance of the final decision. However, the 35-day
period may be extended for a period oftime not to exceed 90 days by written notice from the
owner or operator and the Illinois EPA within the initial 35-day appeal period. Ifthe owner or
ROCKFORD
—4302 North Main Street, Rockford, IL 61103 —(815) 987-7760 • Dts
PLAINES
—9511 W. Harrison St., Des Plaines, IL 60016— (847) 294-4000
ELGIN
— 595 South State, Elgin, IL 60123 —(8471 608-3131
PEORIA
— 5415 N. University St., Peoria, IL 61614 —(309) 693-5463
BUREAU OF LAND
-
PEORIA
— 7620 N. University
5~,~r”’
II ~.1 ~1
A ,~nQ\~
~A(~)
‘~ ~-~‘
~
~
Champaign, IL 61820 —(217) 278-5800
SPRINGFIELD
—4500 S. Sixth Street Rd., Spri~
nsville, IL 62234 — (618) 346-5120
Mi
A

Page 2
operator wishes to receive a 90-day extension, a written request that includes a statement ofthe
date the final decision was received, along with a copy ofthis decision, must be sent to the
Illinois EPA as soon as pos’sible.
For information regarding the filing of an appeal, please contact:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
State ofIllinois Center
100 West Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
312/814-3620
For information regarding the filing of an extension, please contact:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North.Grand Avenue East
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
If you have any questions, please contact Kevin Mably of my staff or Melinda Friedel of
Mike Lowder’s staff at 217/782-6762.
E. Oakley, Manager.
LUST Claims Unit
Planning & Reporting Section
Bureau of Land
DEO:KM:jk\03 l079.doc
Attachment
‘7,
cc:
DAT Environmental

Attachment A
Accounting Deductions
Re:
LPC#03l0515095--CookCounty
Cicero/Clearing Disposal
3800 South Laramie
LUST Incident #89 1673
LUST FISCAL FILE
Item #
Description of Deductions
$111.25,
deduction in costs that the owner/operator failed to demonstrate were
reasonable (Section 22.1 8b(d)(4)(C) ofthe Environmental Protection Act).
DAT Environmental
Invoice #14584
$9.75
Personnel
#14650
$20.00
Equipment
#14715
$18.00
Personnel
#14715
$20.00
Equipment
#14771
$31.50
Personnel
#14891
$12.00 Personnel
$11 1.25 Total Accounting Deductions
DEO:KM:jk\03 1079.doc

Attachment A
Technical Deductions
Re:
LPC#0310515095--CookCounty
Cicero/Clearing Disposal
3800 South
Laramie.
LUST Incident #891673
LUST FISCAL FILE
Item #
Description ofDeductions
$5,663.03,
deduction for an adjustment in costs due to a lackofsupporting
documentation. The owner/operator failed to demonstrate these costs were reasonable
as submitted (Section 22.1 8b(d)(4)(C) of the Environmental Protection Act).
DAI Invoice #14650
--
$497.28 (Enviro Monitor mv. #106010 dated August 31,
2002
need more info on what these samples were for and
when they were collected)
--
$582.40 (Enviro Monitor mv. #105999 dated August 31,
2002
need more info on what these samples were for and
when they were collected)
--
$38.90 (excessive cost for copies
cut to
$50)
#14715
--
$87.50 (Chris Cailles
excessive hours for file organization)
--
$1,067.50
(Chris C.
TACO evaluation is to be performed
during CACR preparation)
--
$227.50 (David K.
excessive hours for data edit and
review)
--
$428.00 (Tom DePaul
senior personnel waiting and
putting
a report together)
#14771
--
$380.00
(Chris C.
excessive hours/clerical work)
--
$52.50
(Chris C.
excessive hours for edit/review)
--
$262.50 (Chris C.
TACO evaluation is to be performed
during CACR preparation)
--
$122.50 (Chris C.
excessive hours for edits and
mailing)
--
$11.25
(Gina L. M.
duplication of work)
--
$837.50 (James
0.
excessive hours for drafting)
--
$110.00 (Rick Vamos
TACO evaluation)
--
$909.50 (Tom D.
senior staff assembly data, editing figures
and performing TACO evaluation)
--
$48.20 (excessive cost for copies
cut to
$50)
2.
$4,889.00, deduction for an adjustment in costs due to a lack ofsupporting
documentation. The owner/operator failed to demonstrate these costs were reasonable
as submitted (Section 22.1 8b(d)(4)(C) ofthe Environmental Protection Act).
Costs
associated with a Phase IIInvestigation Report are not reimbursable since this report
was never submitted. Please note that any such report would not be necessary since a
Corrective Action Completion Report with afull TACO evaluation is to be submitted
for this site showing the extent ofcontamination has beenfully delineated.

3.—
Page 2
DAT Invoice #14584
--
$665.00 (Chris Cailles)
--
$56.25
(Gina L. M.)
--
$625.00
(James
0.)
--
$347.75 (Tom DePaul)
#14650
--
$927.50
(Chris C.)
--
$137.50(JamesO.)
#14684
--
$1,120.00
(Chris C.)
--
$200.00 (James 0.)
#14715
--
$105.00 (Chris
C.)
--
$191.25 (GinaL. M.)
--
$325.00 (James 0.)
--
$55.00
(Rick Vamos)
--
$133.75 (Tom DePaul)
3.
$1,119.85, deduction for an adjustment in costs due to a lack of supporting
documentation. The owner/operator failed to demonstrate these costs were reasonable
as submitted (Section 22.1 8b(d)(4)(C) ofthe Environmental Protection Act).
The last
technical document submittedfor this site was datedNovember 15, 2002. These costs
may be eligiblefor reimbursement after additional technical documentation has been
received
DAllnvoice#14814
--
$207.42 (12/1/02 to 1/31/03)
#14891
--
$912.43(2/1/03to3/31/03)
4.
$3,897.50, deduction in costs that the owner/operator failed to demonstrate were
reasonable (Section 22.l8b(d)(4)(C) of the Environmental Protection Act).
The
owner/operator has not shown that the charges associated with GPS activities are
necessary or can bejust~/Iedas reducing overall costsfor the site.
DAI Invoice #14684
--
$787.50 (Chris Cailles)
--
$937.50 (James 0.)
--
$1,572.50 (John Rouser)
--
$600.00 (equipment costs)
5.
$90.23, deduction for costs which are not for Corrective Action activities. The
owner/operator failed to demonstrate these costs were reasonable as submitted
(Section 22.1 8(e)( 1 )(C) and 22.1 8b(a)(3) of the Environmental Protection Act).
DAT Invoice #14684
--
$19.76 (batteries, rags and sponges are not considered
corrective action costs)
--
$20.07 (batteries)
#14715
--
$50.40 (EDR mv. #871693
Sanborn search has not been
shown to be a required corrective action cost)
Total Technical Deductions
-
$15,659.61
DEO:KM:jk\03 1079.doc

EN~~44.IJITAL
Environmental Engineers, Geologists and Scientists
Tel 847.573.8900
Fax 847.573.8953
Polo Park Business Center
27834 N. Irma Lee Circle
Lake Forest, Illinois 50045-51 30
October 20, 2003
VIA FAXSIMILE
AND
UPS DELIVERY
Mr. John J. Kim, Esq.
Division of Legal Counsel
Illinois Environmental Agency
1021 N. Grand Ave. East
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
Re:
Reimbursement Decision Appeal
LFC #0310515095—Cook County
Cicero/Clearing Disposal
3800 South Laramie
LUSTincident #891673
LUST FISCAL FILE
This letter is to serve as a written
request for a time extension for filing a petition before
the Illinois Pollution Control Board regarding the Agency’s final decision for
reimbursement. This request is being, filed on behalf of Waste Management of
Illinois, Inc. (A copy ofthe decision is attached.)
Dear Mr. Kim:
F. Thomas DePaul
Division ~f LeqaI ~
cci- 21 ~
~flvfronrnentai t-~rQtQctjQfl
Agency
Sincerely,
DAI Environmental, Inc.
cc:
Doug Oakley; LUST Claims Unit, IEPA
Lisa Grassl; Waste Management ofIllinois, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned attorney at law, hereby certify that on October 21, 2003, I served true
and correct copies of a REQUEST FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION OF APPEAL PERIOD,
by placing true and correct copies thereof in properly sealed and addressed envelopes and by
depositing said sealed envelopes in a U.S. mail drop box located within Springfield, Illinois, with
sufficient First Class postage affixed thereto, upon the following named persons:
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
F. Thomas DePaul
Illinois Pollution Control Board
DAT Environmental
James R. Thompson Center
Polo Park Business Center
100 West Randolph Street
27834 North Irma Lee Circle
Suite 11-500
_
Lake Forest, IL
60045-5
130
Chicago, IL 60601
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division ofLegal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)

Back to top