BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROLkB~ARD

McDONALD’S

CORPORATION,

)

~“

.L

7

zoos

)

O~ILU~Q~

Petitioner,

)

Pollution

Control Board

)

PCB 2004-14

)

(UST Appeal)

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY,

)

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The

undersigned hereby

states

on

oath that

on this

17th

day

of October,

2003,

copies

of the

JOINT

STIPULATION

OF

FACTS

were filed with

the

Illinois

Pollution

Control

Board

and

served

by

First

Class

Mail, postage

pre-paid,

upon the parties named

on the

attached Service

List.

McDonald’s Corporation

BY:______________

its

attorney

BarbaraA. Magel

Mark D. Erzen

Karaganis, White & Magel Ltd.

414 North Orleans

Street, Suite 810

Chicago, Illinois

60610

312/836-1177

Fax 312/836-9083

MDEMCO15.DOC

---

SERVICE LIST

John J. Kim, Esq.

Assistant Counsel

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Division ofLegal Counsel

1021

North Grand Avenue East

Springfield, Illinois

62794-9276

Bradley P. Halloran

Hearing Officer

Illinois Pollution Control Board

James R. Thompson Center, Suite .11-500

100 West Randolph Street

Chicago, Illinois

60601

mdemcol5.doc

---

BEFORE

TilE

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOAR)

McDONALD’S CORPORATION,

)

)

‘

Petitioner,

)

po/lutI0~~

)

PCB 2004-14

ontro/Boad

V.

)

(UST Appeal)

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY,

)

)

Respondent.

)

JOINT STIPULATION OF FACTS

Petitioner

McDonald’s

Corporation

(“McDonald’s”)

and

Respondent

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Agency

(“IEPA”)

hereby

stipulate

to

the

following

facts

for

the

purposes ofthis proceeding only.

TilE PARTIESAND THE

SITE

1.

The

Petitioner

in

this

proceeding

is

McDonald’s

Corporation

(“McDonald’s”),

a

corporation headquartered in OakBrook,

Illinois.

2.

The Respondent in this proceeding

is the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

(the

“IEPA”).

3.

The site involved

in this proceeding

is

located at

1120

West 22nd

Street in

Oak Brook,

Illinois (the “Site”).

The Site occupies the northeast corner ofthe intersection formed by

22nd

Street

and

Spring

Road.

That

intersection

is

the

first

intersection

that

drivers

encounter after exiting 1-88 and entering Oak Brook.

4.

Photographs ofthe

Site are attached as Exhibits

1

and 2, and

a map showing the location

ofthe Site is

attached as Exhibit

3.

---

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

5.

This

proceeding

arises

out

of a

Petition

To

Appeal which

was

filed

by

McDonald’s

seeking

to

reverse

the

IEPA’s

decision

dated

June 23,

2003,

insofar

as

that

decision

denied

$3 1,515.00

in

costs

based

upon JEPA’ s determination that

“the owner/operator

failed

to

demonstrate

that

those

costs

were

reasonable...

.“

Ill.Adm.Code

Title

35,

§

105.408(a).

6.

The Petition To

Appeal was filed within thirty-five days of service ofthe JEPA’s June 23,

2003

decision,

thus

making

the

Petition

To

Appeal

timely.

Ill.Adm.Code

Title

35,

§

105.408(b).

THE

FACTS

GIVING RISE

TO

THIS APPEAL

7.

A number of years ago, the

soil

at the Site became contaminated with hydrocarbons as a

result ofspills or leaks that occurred in connection with the operation ofa gasoline filling

and

service station

(since demolished)

at the

Site.

Two IEPA Incident Numbers have

been

assigned

to

the

Site:

Incident

Number

902922

and

Incident

Number

952344.

McDonald’s was not involved in the operation ofthe gasoline filling and

service station.

8.

McDonald’s, which purchased and

is the

current owner of the

Site, has undertaken

the

remediation of the Site.

The Corrective Action Plan for the remediation ofthe

Site was

approved by the IEPA in May, 2002.

9.

The remediation of the

Site is

now completed, and the IEPA has granted

a “no

further

action” letter to McDonald’s.

See,

e.g.,

Exhibits

1

and 2 (photographs ofthe Site).

10.

Generally

speaking,

the

remediation of the

Site involved

the

removal of contaminated

soil

from

the

Site

and

the

replacement

of the

contaminated

soil

with

clean

fill

in

accordance with the Corrective ActionPlan approved by the JEPA.

2

---

11.

After

officials

from

the

Village

of

Oak

Brook

(“Oak

Brook”)

became

aware

of the

remediation of the Site and that the remediation required clean fill,

Oak Brook requested

that McDonald’s use backfill soil that Oak Brook owned as clean

fill at the

Site.

That

soil

(the “backfill soil”) was located in

a soil pile on

31St

Street in Oak Brook and had to

be removed from that location.

12.

Oak

Brook’s

backfill

soil

was

offered

to

McDonald’s

at

no

cost

to

McDonald’s.

Consequently, the only cost to McDonald’s relating to the use ofthe backfill soil as fill at

the Site (assuming

that the

backfill soil

was

suitable

for that purpose) was the

cost of

removing the

backfill

soil

from

the

soil

pile

on

31st

Street

and

transporting it

to

and

properly placing it at the Site on 22nd Street.

13.

The potential for using the backfill soil as fill was then discussed between Carmen Yung,

an

employee

of

McDonald’s

remediation

contractor,

MACTEC

Engineering

and

Consulting

of

Georgia,

Inc.

(“MACTEC”),

and

Ms.

Valerie

Davis

of the

IEPA

in

November,

2002.

In that

conversation,

Ms.

Davis

of the

IEPA

told

Ms.

Yung

of

MACTEC

that the IEPA would

consider the backfill

soil

to be

acceptable as fill

at the

Site if assurances

could be provided which

confirmed that the backfill soil did not come

from a

contaminated source.

In addition, the IEPA also requested that one

sample ofthe

backfill soil be collected and tested for priority pollutants.

See

February 22, 2002 Report,

attached as Exhibit 4.

14.

The Village of Oak Brook then confirmed in writing that to the best of its knowledge, the

backfill soil did not come from a contaminated source.

15.

In accordance with the IEPA’s request, a sample ofthe backfill soil

was taken and tested.

The results of the test

of the

sample of backfill

soil

showed that the

backfill

soil

was

suitable for use as fill at the Site.

See

February 22,

2002 Report, attached as Exhibit 4.

3

---

16.

MACTEC

had recommended that the backfill soil

be

continuously screened prior

to

its

use

as fill

at the

Site,

and the backfill

soil was initially

continuously

screened before it

was used at the Site.

That screening did not detect any elevated PID readings or visual or

olfactory

signs

of

contamination.

MACTEC

then

contacted

Ms.

Davis

of EPA

concerning

the screening.

Due to the time

and

cost of continuous screening, Ms.

Davis

recommended

that

additional

soil

samples

be

collected

and

tested

in

lieu

of

the

continuous screening.

See

February 22,

2002 Report, attached as Exhibit 4, p. 3.

17.

Nine

additional

samples of the backfill

soil

were

therefore

taken and

tested,

and

were

found

(with

one

exception

relating

to

arsenic

concentration)

to

be

within

the

most

stringent

TACO Tier

1

soil

remediation objectives.

MACTEC

therefore concluded

that

the backfill soil was not contaminated.

18.

The remaining backfill

soil was then loaded at the 31st Street location and transported to

the Site for use as fill.

19.

After backfill

soil arrived at the Site, the backfill soil was placed in the excavations as fill

and then rolled over by a sheepsfoot roller.

Illustration ofsheepsfoot roller.

4

---

20.

McDonald’s used the sheepsfoot roller to

roll over the backfill

soil after the backfill soil

was placed into excavations at the Site solely to

compact the fill

sufficiently to prevent

voids and severe settlement.

21.

McDonald’s

wished

to

avoid

the

presence

of

voids

and

the

possibility

of

severe

settlement because voids

and severe settlements

would

cause the surface of the

Site to

sink below grade at the Site.

22.

If the

surface

of the

Site

were

to

sink

below

grade, it

would

be

necessary

to

bring

additional fill to the Site to once again restore the surface ofthe Site to grade.

23.

The use ofthe

sheepsfoot roller on the

fill

after the placement of the backfill

soil

at the

Site was referred to by McDonald’s excavation contractor as “compaction.”

24.

In-place density testing is typically conducted afterthe compaction offill whenever fill

is

compacted for the purpose ofreadying a site for construction on the compacted fill.

The

results ofthe in-place density testing are used to determine if the fill has been compacted

to a density that is sufficient to support the anticipated construction.

25.

No in-place density testing ofthe backfill soil after it was placed

at the

Site

and

rolled

over with a sheepsfoot roller has ever been conducted.

26.

The placement of the backfill

soil

at the Site, including

the thickness

of the

lifts (i.e.,

layers) employed

during the placement ofthe backfill soil, was not designed, conducted,

intended or engineered for the purpose ofinsuring that the backfill

soil

would provide a

sufficient base for later construction at the Site.

5

---

27.

In

its

submission

of LUST

Fund

reimbursement

requests

to

the

IEPA,

McDonald’s

included

bills

from

a

subcontractor

for

the

loading,

transportation,

placement

and

compaction ofthe

soil at the

Site.

At the request of EPA, McDonald’s remediation and

excavation contractors calculated that the cost ofthe “compaction” included in those bills

—

i.e., the cost of rolling the sheepsfoot roller on the backfill soil after it was placed at the

Site

—

was in total

$31,515.00.

THE

PARTIAL DENIAL

OF McDONALD’S APPLICATION

FOR

REIMBURSEMENT

FROM THE LUST

FUN)

28.

McDonald’s applied to the Illinois Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund (the “LUST

Fund”)

for

reimbursement

of the

cost

of remediating

the

Site.

That

application

for

reimbursement included what

was later

calculated to

be

$31,515.00

for the

cost of the

“compaction.”

29.

In a final decision dated May 12,

2003

from IEPA to McDonald’s,

IEPA deducted

from

the

approved

costs

of reimbursement the

$31,515.00

cost

of the

“compaction”

of the

backfill soil at the Site.

30.

McDonald’s did not appeal the May 12, 2003

final decision.

31.

In

response

to

the

IEPA’s

May

12,

2003

letter,

McDonald’s

remediation

contractor,

MACTEC

Engineering

and

Consulting of Georgia,

Inc.

(“MACTEC”),

sent

a

letter to

IEPA dated May 20, 2003.

That letter is attached as Exhibit

5.

32.

MACTEC’s May 20,

2003

letter indicated that the purpose of the “compaction” was

to

“prevent voids

in

and severe settlement” ofthe backfill soil

that was being used as fill,

that the “compaction” was therefore properly part ofthe

soil placement process.

6

---

33.

MACTEC’s May 20, 2003

letter

also

indicated that

use of crushed

stone

instead of the

backfill

soil

as fill would have raised the total cost of the remediation by approximately

$50,000 above the total cost which was the basis for McDonald’s reimbursement request.

34.

MACTEC’s May 20, 2003

letter also

stated that the use of Oak Brook’s backfill

soil

as

fill

instead

of crushed

stone

“helped

the

Village

of

Oak

Brook

to

dispose

of their

unwanted soil and turned it into use.”

The letter also

stated that McDonald’s “should not

be penalized by

employing

cost saving

and

environmental conservation

methods in

site

remediation when McDonald’s could have obtained

full reimbursement if crushed

stone

was used as backfill material.”

35.

MACTEC’s May 20,

2003

letter served

as

a request for reimbursement of $1,684.19

in

costs

related to

furnishing

and

installing

limestone

and

$31,515.00

in

costs

related to

compaction of backfill.

The costs and justification for the request for reimbursement are

set forth in the May 20,

2003

letter.

The letter indicates that those

costs

are sought

for

reimbursement.

36.

In a final decision dated June 23,

2003,

JEPA

deducted

$31,515.00

in

“costs

that

the

owner/operator

failed

to

demonstrate

were

reasonable

(Section 22.1 8b(d)(4)(C) of the

Environmental

Protection Act).”

The Illinois EPA identified three invoices that

formed

the bases for the deduction of costs.

The Illinois EPA characterized those

costs as being

“ineligible costs for compaction.”

See

Exhibit

6, attached.

37.

In arriving at its final decision dated June 23, 2003

and for purposes ofthis appeal, IEPA

did not and does not contest the fact that the compaction ofthe backfill soil was properly

part of the soil placement process.

7

---

McDonald’s Corporation

BY:________________

their attorney

Barbara A. Magel

Mark D. Erzen

Karaganis, White & Magel Ltd.

414 North Orleans Street, Suite 810

Chicago, Illinois

60610

312/836-1177

Fax 312/836-9083

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

BY:_________

their attorney

John J. Kim, Esq.

Assistant

Counsel

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Division ofLegal Counsel

1021 North Grand Avenue East

Springfield, Illinois

62794-9276

217/782-5544

Fax 217/782-9807

MDEMCO15.DOC

8

---

---

---

Oak Brook Center Mall

EXHIBIT

1:

Taken 9/18/2003

Looking West-Southwest from

an upper floor ofthe office building to the east ofthe Site

---

---

EXHIBIT 2:

Taken 9/18/2003

Looking southwest from Northeast corner of Site

---

---

Exhibit

3: Map showing approximate location of the Site

---

---

---

---

j

MACTEC

February 10,2003

..__d

~

Mr.Den Koide

McDonald’s

Corporation

2111 McDonald’sDrive

Oak

Brook,

Illinois

60523

Subject:

Report ofSoil Sampling ofthe Village of

Oak

Brook’s Soil

Pile

McDonald’s Corporation PropertyLocated at 1120

West

22nd

Street,

Oak

Brook,

Illinois

IEPA Incident Nos. 902922

&

952344

LAW Proposal No. 52099-0-0000-0499

Dear Mr. Koide:

Mactee Engineering and Consulting

ofGeorgia1

Inc., (MACTEC)

is pleased

to

submit this

Report

of Sail Sampling of the

Village of

Oak

Brook’s Soil

Pile

in

connection

with

the soil

remediation

project

at McDonald’s

Corporation (McDonald’s)

property

located at

1120 West

22nd

Street in

Oak Brook,

illinois (subject property).

Our

work was

performed in general accordance with the

scope of work described

in

MACTEC’s

Contract

Change Order dated December 2,

2002

and our

Recommendations on

Evaluating the

Village of Oak Brook’s Soil Pile

dated

January

3, 2003

and

approved

by

McDonald’s.

The

following

report

includes

the

background

information,

field

activities, physical and

analytical results,

arid conclusionand

recommendations.

Background Information

The

subject

property

is

currently a

vacant

tract

of

land

owned

by

McDonald’s

Corporation

undergoing soil remediation under

the illinois

Environmental Protection

Agency (IEPA)’s leaking

underground storage

tank

(LUS’I)

program.

The

subject project

was

formerly developed

with a

retail

petroleum distribution

and

auto repair facility that

subsequently ceased

operation

arid was

demolished around 1995.

The four USTs at the subject property

(one 4,000-gallon

gasoline,

one

6,000-gallon

gasoline,

one

8,000-gallon gasoline

and

one

550-gallon

used

oil)

and

associated

piping

were

excavated

and

removed

on

November

14,

1995.

Two

LUST

incident

numbers

associated with the formerTJST systems were obtained for the subject property.

MACTEC Engineering

and

Consulting, Inc.

1200 Jane Blvd., Suite

230

•

Oak

Brook,

IL 60523

630-571-2162

•

Fax: 630-571-0439

EXHIBIT

4

---

McDonald’s

Corporation.

Oak

Brook

Illinois

February

10.2003

LAW

Project 52000-2-2681-09

ReportofSoil

Sampling

ofthe Village ofof

Oak

Brook’s

Soil Pile

Subsurface assessments consisting ofsoil

and groundwater sampling at the subject property were

performed from

1991 to 2000.

Based on the results of the subsurface assessments, it was estimated

that approximately 12,000 cubic

yards

of soils

were impacted by releases from the formerUSTs.

On February 27,

2002, LAW

(currenliy MACTEC) prepared and submitted a Revised Corrective

Action Plan (CAP)

and Budget Proposal to the illinois Environmental Protection

Agency

(IEPA)

based

on

fmdings

of our

July

2000

limited

subsurface

assessment.

In

the

revised

CAP,

soil

excavation

and disposal

was the recommended method for soil remediation.

The IEPA via their

May

3, 2002 letter conditionally approved our Revised CAP.

Soilexcavation activities began at the subject property on December

5,

2002.

During a

site

meeting

among

representatives

from

R.W.

Collins,

the

soil

removal

contractor,

MACTEC,

Village of Oak Brook and McDonald’s on November 21,

2002,

the

useof soilfrom soil

piles

owned

by the Village of Oak Brook as backfill material at the subject property was

discussed.

McDonald’s

has

requested

MACTEC

to

conduct

soil

sampling

of the soil piles

and

to

present

additional

estimated cost associated

with using the soil from the

Village of Oak Brook instead of

the originally proposed crushed stone as backfill material.

On November 22, 2002, Ms. Carmen

Yuug of MACTEC contacted Ms. Valerie Davis, project manager of EPA,

Leaking

Underground

Storage Tank Programregarding sampling anduse of the soil pile as backfill material at the subject

site.

Ms. Valerie Davis told

MACFEC

that the IEPA would consider the soil from the Village of

Oak Brook as acceptable backfill if assurance can be provided to confirm that the soil did not come

from

a

contaminated

source.

In

addition,

the

IEPA will

also

require

that

one

soil

sample

be

collected fromthe soil piles and tested fortotal priority pollutants.

The Village of Oak Brook via their November 22, 2002 letter to McDonald’s, stated that to the best

of their knowledge, the soil pile does

not contain any

contaminants,

that the

soil is a temporary

stockpile of the soil excavated for the Village of

Oak Brook library when

it

was

built

about two

years ago and the recent Village Hall expansion.

2

---

McDonald’sCorporation.

Oak

Brook Illinois

February 10, 2(AIi

LAW

Project

52000-2-2681-09

ReportofSoil

Sampling

ofthe Village ofof

Oak

Brook’s Soil File

FIELD

ACT!

V11’1Jt~S

On

November 26, 2002, MACTECpersonnel collected

one composite soil sample

from the Village

of

Oak Brook’s

soil pile using a hand

auger.

The composite

soil sample

was

collected from

five

different locations from

the soil pile. Three soil samples

were collected from the

east side

of the

soil pile

and

two

soil samples

were collected from the top of the soil pile.

Due

to the presence of

large pieces

of stone or concrete at

various

sampling

locations,

refusal was encountered at various

sampling

locations.

These

sampling

locations were

subsequently abandoned and

new

sampling

locations were chosen for sampling.

The five soil samples were collected at approximately four to

five feet below the surface of the soil

pile.

The hand-auger used for

this sampling

was washed with

Alconox solution

and rinsed

with

distilled

water

prior to

use

at

each location.

The soil samples

were then composited into

one soil

sample (designated as

soil pile

1), put into laboratory-provided

containers, packed with ice

and

shipped to Prairie Analytical

Systems,

Inc.

in

Springfield, illinois

with the chain-of-custody for

laboratory analyses of total priority pollutants.

Due

to

the size

of the

soil pile

(more

than

15,000

cubic

yards

according

to

the Village of Oak

Brook),

that the

soil inside

the soil piles could not be readily

accessible

and

checked for

signs of

contamination

and

that

only

one

soil

sample

was

collected

for

laboratory

analyses,

MACTEC

recommended

that,

as

a

minimum,

MACTEC

personnel

be

on-site

screening

the

soil

with

a

Photoiothzation

Hnu

detector

(Pit))

and

checking

the

soil

for

visual

and

olfactory

signs

of

contamination at the time thatthe soil is

being

excavated and loaded to the

trucks

for transportation

to the subject

property

for

use.

On-site

screening

of the soil

pile

was subsequently

performed

from December 30,

2002

to

3anuary

3, 2003.

Soil

was collectedfrom

the

soil pile into

resealable Ziploc bags randomly.

Soil collected

was

allowed

to

warm

up

for 5

to

10

minutes.

P11)

headspace readings

were then

obtained by

inserting the

P11)

probe

in

the

Ziploc

bags.

Based

on

our

on-site

screening,

no elevated P1D

readings nor visual

and

olfactory signs of contamination were reported.

On

January

3,

2003, Ms.

Carmen Yung of MACTEC

contacted Ms.

Valerie

Davis

of

the IEPA

regarding continuing on-site screening of the

soil pile.

Dueto

the

length

of

time and

cost involved

for continuing on-site

screening, Ms. Valerie Davis suggested that

additional

soil samples from the

soil

pile

be

collected

and

tested

instead of continued

on-site

screening.

(Refer to

MACTEC’s

Recommendationson Evaluating the Village of

Oak

Brook’sSoil Pile,

dated

January 3, 2003)

3

---

McDonald’s

Corporation, OakBroolç fUinoi.~

February 10,2003

JAW

Project 52000-2-2681-09

Report ofSoil

Sampling

ofthe Village ofof

Oak

Brook’s Soil

Pile

On

January 9, 2003, MACFEC

personnel collected additional

samples

from the soil pile.

Nine soil

samples

were collected from nine

locations

at

approximately

four to five

feet below the

surface

using a hand auger. The

hand-auger used for this

sampling was washed

with Alconox solution

and

rinsed with

distilled

water

prior

tà

be

used

at

each

location.

The

soil

samples

were

then

cornposited

into

three

soil

samples

(designated

as

soil pile

2

through

4),

put

into

laboratory-

provided containers, packed with

ice and

shipped to Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. in Springfield,

illinois

with the chain-of-custody for laboratory analyses of total priority pollutants.

PHYSICALAN!) ANALYTICAL EESULTS

The soil encountered

during

collection

of samples

consists

of

sand

and gravel,

broken

pieces

of

concrete

and

brown to

grey

silty clay.

Analytical

results of the soil

sample

collectedfrom the soil pile are

compared to

the

most

stringent

EPA

Tier

1 soil

remediation

objectives promulgated

in

35

illinois

Administrative

Code

Part

Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO).

Various

volatile

organic

compounds

(VOCs)

including

1,2,3-Trichioropropane

at

0.0234

milligrams

per

kilogram (mg/kg)

and

toluene

at 0.00625

mg/kg

were reported in sample

3

and

methylene

chloride

at

0.0083

mg/kg

was reported in

sample 4.

However, their concentrations

are

all below the

most stringent TACO Tier

I soil remediation objectives.

VOCs were not detected in

soil sample

1

and

2.

DetectedVOC concentrations

are

summarized in Table 1.

Senü-VOCs,

PCBs, pesticides,

herbicides

were

not

detected

above the laboratory detection

limits

in the four soil samples collected.

Various metals including arsenic, barium, chromium,

copper, lead,

nickel arid

zinc were detected

above the laboratory

detection

limits but

their

concentrations

were either below the most stringent

Tier

1 soil remediation objectives or the IEPA established background concentrations for inorganic

chemicals

with

the

exception of

arsenic

concentration reported

in

soil

sample

2

at

13.7

mg/kg

which

slightly exceeded the IEPA

established background concentration for

arsenic

at

13

mg/kg.

Metal concentrations detected

are

summarized in Table 2.

4

---

McDonald’s Corporation,

Oak

Broo/c Illinois

February 10, 200.,

JAW

Project 52000-2-2681-09

Report ofSoil Sampling of

the

Village ofof

Oak

Brook’s Soil Pile

Laboratory data sheets are included as

Attachment A.

CONCLUSIONS AN!)

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on

our

on-site screening results that no elevated

ND

readings nor

visual

or

olfactory signs

of

contamination

were

reported

and

the

analytical

results

of the

four

soil

samples

collected

that

showed

that

only

one

soil

sample

had

arsenic

concentration

very

slightly

above

the

IEPA

background

concentration,

we

conclude

that

the

soil

at

locations

where the

soil samples

were

collected

was

not contaminated.

We

appreciate

the

opportunity

to

provide

continued

environmental

consulting

services

to

McDonald’s.

We

are

committed

to

providing

the

expertise

you

require

for

the

successful

completion

of

this

project.

Should you

have

any

questions

regarding

this report,

please do

hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

MACTEC Engineering

and Consulting

of

Georgia, Inc.

F/k/a LAW Engineering

andEnvironmental Services, Inc.

~YUJT

bt~P.E

Senior Environmental

essional

Principal

Attachment:

Table

1

Table 2

Attachment A

—

Laboratory DataSheets

5

---

McDonald’sCorporath,n,

OakBroolç

Illincj5

February

10,

2003

LA WProjecs 52000-2-2681.09

Report ofSoil

Sainpiiizg

ofthe Village ofof

Oak

Brook’s Soil Pile

TABLES

6

---

McDonald’s Corporation,

Oak

Srook,

IL

Fe0ruary

.~,

LAW

Project

52000-2-2681-09

Report

of

Soil

Sampling

-

Sal! Pile

Table 1: Summary

of

Detected

Volatile

Oragnic Compounds in Soil

Samples

Sample

Identification

Soil

Pile I

1

1i~6IO2

(4-5)

Soil

PIle 2

01/09/03

(4-5)

Soil

PileS

01/09/03

(4-5)

Soil

Pile

4

JTier 1 Soil

Remediation

O1,~9fO3

Objective

1

(45)

Sample Date

Sample Depth (feet)

Parameter

(mglkg)

~__________________

1,2,3-Tiichloropropane

ND

ND

0.0234

ND

NE

Toluene

ND

ND

0.00625

ND

12

Methylene Chloride

ND

NO

ND

0.0083

0,02

Notes:

1

The

most conservative Tier

1

soil

remediatlan

objective

for

residential propertiesas

presented

In

the

Tiered Approach

to

Cleanup Objectives

(TACO) in 35 Illinois Administrative

Code

(lAG)

35 Part

742, Appendx

B,

Table A

mg/lcg:

Milligrams par kilogram (ppm)

ND:

Not

Detected

Above Method Detection Unit

NE:

No soil

remedlation objective

established

PreparedBy

1~/~/J23~’~J

CheckedBy

Page

1

of

1

---

McDonald’s

Corporation, OakSmok~

IL

February

~,

LAW

Project

52000-2-2681-09

Report

of Soil Sampling-Soil

Pile

Table2: Summary of Detected Metal Constituents in Soil Samples

Sample Identification

Soil

Pile

1

Soil Pile 2

Soil

Pile 3

Soil Pile 4

Background

Ingestion/

Sample

Date

11/26/02

01/09/03

01/09/03

01/09103

Concentrations2

lnhalatio&

Sample Depth (feet)

(4-5)

(4-5)

(4.5)

(4-5)

Parameter (mg/kg)

Antimony

ND

NA

NA

NA

4.0

31

Arsenic

9,26

~137

,~

109

109

13

04

Barium

NA

41.7

40.9

55.6

110

5,500

Beryllium

ND

NA

NA

NA

0.59

0

Cadmium

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.6

78

Chromium (total)

7.33

14.5

8.09

9.64

16.2

390

Copper

17.5

NA

NA

NA

19.6

2900

Lead

18.4

24

20.2

23.3

36

400

Mercury

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.06

10

Nickel

20.9

NA

NA

NA

NE

1,600

Selenium

ND

ND

ND

ND

NE

390

Silver

ND

ND

ND

ND

NE

390

ThallIum

ND

NA

NA

NA

NE

8.3

Zinc

44.4

NA

NA

NA

NE

23000

Notes:

The

most conservative cleanup objective br the

Ingestion

and Inhalation expsoure route as

presented In the Tiered Approach

to

Cleanup Objectives

(TACO)

in 35

Illinois Administrative

Code

(JAC)

35 Part

742.

AppendIx B

Table

A.

2

Concentrations

at

lnor~anlc

Chemicals

In

Background

Soils

-

Counties Within

Metropolitan

Statistical Areas, TACO, 35

IAC

Part

742,

AppendIx

A,

Table G.

mg/kg:

Milligrams per kilogram (ppm)

NA:

Not Analyzed

ND:

Not

Detected

Above Method Detection Umit

BOLD:

Indicates concentration above remedlation objectivebut below

the

background concentration

Indicates

concentration

above both the rernedlation objective

and

thebackground concentration

Prepared

By

C_~

~

Checked

By: ~3~4O

I).—7

~

Page

1

of

1

---

McDonald’.r

Corporation, OakBroolç

IllLwis

February10,20(i.,

L4WProject52000-2-2681-09

Report ofSoil Sampling ofthe

Village ofof

Oak

Brook’.r

Soil

Pile

ATTACHMENT A

LABORATORY

DATA

SHEETS

7

---

1265

Capital

Airport Drive

Springfield,

IL62707-8490

Phone:217-753-1148

FAX: 217-753-1152

rrai~i~

~jLlbrn

Decembe~r16,2002.

.

.

.

.

.

Systems,

INCORPORATED

Ms. CarmenY~ig

Law

Enviromnental

&

Engineering Services:.

.

.

5440 N.

Ctimberland

Ave

chicago, IL

60’656

.

.

‘RE:

McDonald’s 52000-2-2681

.

PASO~~erNo.: 02

1123

Dear Ms: Carmen Yung;

..

.

.

.

Prairie

Analytical Systems,

Inc.

received

1

sample On 11/27/2002: or the

aual~

~espresented in

the

followingreport.

..‘:

,

.‘

.

.

.

.

.~

.

.

.

All

applicable

quality

contrOl procedures thetrnethód speci6c acceptance criteria.”

This

report

shall

notb~repi~oduced~

exceptin full,

without th.e prior written.cozjentofPraix~e

Analytical Systems

Inc.

:

.•

..

.

.

.

.

If

you have

any qnestith)s, please’feel free to

call

me

at.(217)

75S-.i

148.

I-P Rouanet

Laboratory Director

---

IJ~A

;~.~Ji

1265 Capilal

AIrport Diive-

Sprtng6eld,

IL

62707-8490

-

Phone

(217) 753-1148

-

Fac~ImIte(217) 753-1152

-

E-mail IL100323c~aol.com

•

_

____

~

rranu~~

itiiaiy

LIb(I1

Systems,

INCOOUT!.D

ClIent

‘

Address

City

State

ZIp Code

Phone! FacsimIle No.

l_AiA

~k~J~-G-&(dJ~

.

.

::‘.

~1

~“~r.?)cNkL)’S

5’~~-D2

).~“(

iz~44~p

~

~

p

4.iJ(~.

,

‘.~r9

L~qaUdh1~-

U.).o

(‘-3

~A

~T

b~r~~I(

~

I!

~

(

~

~

LL

(~,

5

S~mplex(sti

Phen~14o

C.

Awi~j

\j

~ ~

/

3~

-

~~-R

-

~

3 ~

—o

42o

I

~

~

—4

‘2-a

-

~

(3

..

TurnaroL&n~T1m~

.

Standard

(1

Rush)~jDate Requlred:J)~~

4.,

i.~o2..

Contact Person

L~ &AJ

\/

i.J

j~

.

P.0#

oi~

invoIce To

.

CrF2~1~J

V

J

AJ ~

Sample

Description

(10

Characters

Only)

~j~og

Lpi

L(~-

i

‘.

Sampling

.

‘

Container

,

3M

~4

P

-

Z~p~)~’~

.~p~dk

~-r

4oL

/4~

~oi

L.a..

;~

IL-

I

I

,

Analysls.and

1

or Method Requestld

,

‘

-,

~

~

~Iefl~ call)

‘

-rol-

ak

t’

o

i~4~

ho It

~ct&~cf~.

1.

V()CI~~

~‘s

v6b~,

-~

~

~

PAS Sample

Number

Accepted!

ReJe~e~1

~‘

~

~Aft~1~

Date

‘1-

~-C

lime

~i~n-~4

I

I

I

I

R..c&d\

~

t+~L~

1

‘‘suiI

AMR~I

—-—-

,

,.

s,

A(JR(J

A~

fRU

I

I

AII~l

j

,,

~‘

AIJ1RIJI

,,

,,

?,

A.tlRt’l

.

.

.

,

.

.

.

“

‘~

.

.

,

j

AR(

‘SizeofConatiner

4OmL

‘

‘

i25mL

:

.

25ISmL’.

500mL

‘

1000.mL

O-Other(Speclfy)’

2Type

of

Container

G

-

Glass (Clear)

AG

-

Glass (Amber)

.

P

-

HDPE

“

VC- Volatile

COre

SC- Soil Core

0-

Other (Specify)

M

Matrix Coda

•‘

A-Aqueous

DW

-

Dtinklhg

Water

‘

• NA

-

Non-aqueous

U~uid

“

SE- Saline Water

•

S

-

Solids

,‘

0 -Othe’r(Spectfy)

4P=PreservativeCode

•

.

..~-~J~fle’

Relinquished

By:

‘,

•:

~

....::

~

,

B,-HNO3

•

.:

c.-i-~so4:.•~.~

.

~

‘

.,.

~

~

~

~1~L

E’.HCI

O-,OthercSpeqify~

~

~d~x

Special Instructions:

.

•

.

•.

.

.

•

‘•..

.

•

.

.

.‘

•

‘

•

:

•

~‘

.

.

•

..

~‘~•‘\“..:

~

~

PAS-COC 166.185 (b)

Page

______

of

______

Copies

White

-

Client

Yellow

PAS

Inc

Pink

-

Sampler

‘•

,.

,.

.

.:

•

•

•

•

•

:..

~

•

••.

“

:‘......

~

..‘

•

•

---

Prairie

Analytical Systems,

Inc.

Date:

16-Dec-02

CLIENT:

Law

Enviroximental &

Engineering

Project:

McDonald’s

52000-2-268 1

Services

La

b

Order:

0211123

Lab ID:

0211123-001

•

Collection Date:

11/26,2002

Client Sample ID:

Soil Pile

1

Matrix:

SOLID

Analyses

Result

Limit

Qual

Units

OF

Date Analyzed

PRIORITY POLLUTANT

METALS

ANALYSIS

E200.8

(SW3O5OB)

Analyst: MCL

Antimony

U

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

12/3/2002 11:51:00

PM

Arsenic

9.26

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

12/3/2002

11:51 :00 PM

Beryllium

U

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

12/3/2002

11:51:00PM

Cadmium

U

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

12/3/2002

11:51:00

PM

Chromium

7.33

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

1213/2002

11:51:00 PM

Copper

17.5

5.40

mg/Kg-dry

10

121312002

11:51:00 PM

Lead

18.4

2J0

mg/Kg-dry

10

12/412002 3:30:00 PM

Mercury

U

0.540

mg/Kg-dry

10

12t312002•11:51:00 PM

Nickel

20.9

.

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

121312002

11:51:00PM

Selenium

U

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

1213/2002

11:51:00 PM

Silver

U

2.70

mg/Kg-dry’

10

1213/2002 11:51:00 PM

Thallium

U

2.70

mg/Kg-dry

10

12/4/2002

3:30:00 PM

Zinc

•

44.4

5.40

mg/Kg-dry

10

12/3/2002

11:51:00

PM

SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS

.

SWS2TOC

(SW3550B)

Analyst: JA

I

2,4-Trichlorobenzene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

I

•

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

1,2-Dichiorobenzene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

1,3-Dlchloroberrzene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:1 7:00 PM

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

2,4.5-Trichlorophenol

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00

PM

2,4,6-Trithiorophenoi

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002

1:17:00

PM

2,4-Dichlorophenol

.

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

2,4-Dimethyiphenol

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

I

•

12/4/2002 1:1

7:00

PM

2,4-Dlnltrophenol

Li

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/20021:17:00 PM

2,4-Dlnltrotoiuene

LI

777

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002 1:17:00 PM

2,6-Dinitrotoluene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

121412002

1:17:00

PM

2-Chloronaphthalene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214120021:17:00 PM

2-Chlorophenaf

1!

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

121412002

1:17:00 PM

2-Methylnaphthalene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

2-Methyiphenol

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00

PM

2-Nitroaniline

U

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214120021:17:00

PM

2-Nitrophenof

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/412002 1:17:00 PM

3 & 4-Methyiphenol

U

777

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00PM

3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine

U

777

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

3-Nitroaniline

U

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

4,6-Dinitro-2-rnethyiphenoi

‘

U

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00

PM

4-Bromophenyl

phenyl

ether

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00

PM

4-Chloro-3-methylphenoi

U

777

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00

PM

4-Chioroaniline

U

777

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/4/2002 1:17:00

PM

4-Chiorophenyl

phenyl

ether

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002 1:17:00

PM

Page

6

of

11

---

Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc.

‘

Date:

16-Dec-02

CLIENT:

Law Envirotunental &

Engineering Services

Lab Order:

0211123

Project:

McDonald’s

52000-2-2681

SEMIVOLATILES

ANALYSIS

SW8270C

(SW3550B)

Analyst:

JA

4-Nitroaniline

U

777

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

4-Nitrophenol

U

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00

PM

Acenaphthene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Acenaphthylene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/4/20021:17:00 PM

Anthracene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002

1:17:00 PM

Benzo(a)anthracene

U

389

~

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Benzo(a)pyrene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

Ben~o(b)fluoranthene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Benzo(k)tluoranthene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

Benzoicacld

U

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/20021:17:OOPM

Benzylalcohol

U

777

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/4/20021:17:OOPM

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002 1:17:00 PM

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002 1:17:00 PM

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate

U

389

~~/K~-d~

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Butyl benzyl phthalate

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Carbazole

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002

1:17:00PM

Chrysene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

Di-n-butyl phthalate

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002 1:17:00 PM

Di-n-octyl phthalate

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00PM

Dlbenz(a,h)anthracene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Dibenzofuran

U

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00

PM

Diethyl

phthalate

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

Dimethyl

phthalate

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Fluoranthene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002•1:17:OOPM

Fluorene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Hexachiorobenzene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Hexachiorobutadiene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

U

777

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00PM

Hexachloroethane

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

lrtdeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:1 7:00 PM

isophorone

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/20021:17:00 PM

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

N-Nitrosodiphenytamine

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

121412002

1:17:00 PM

Naphthalene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

Nitrobenzene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00 PM

Pentachiorophenol

Li

1940

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002 1:17:00

PM

Phenanthrene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002

1:1 7:00 PM

Phenol

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/4/2002

1:17:00 PM

Pyrene

U

389

pg/Kg-dry

1

1214/2002

1:17:00 PM

VOLATILES

ANALYSIS

SWS2GOB

Analyst: RP

1,1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/312002

1:15:00 PM

1,1,1-Trichioroethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

1213120021:15:00

PM

Paae

7 of 11

---

Prairie

Analytical Systems,

Inc.

Date:

16-Dec-02

CLIENT:

Law

Environmental

& Engineering Services

Lab Order:

0211123

Project:

McDonald’s 52000-2-2681

VOLATILES

ANALYSIS.

-

SW8260B

Analyst: SP

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00PM

1,1 ,2-Trichioroethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

1,1-Dichloroethane

U

5.83

~~/K~-d~

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

1,1-Dichloroethene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

1,1-Dichloropropene

.

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3120021:15:00 PM

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kgry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

1,2,3-Trichloropropane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00PM

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

1,2,4-Trimethyibenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

1,2-IJlbromo-3-chloroprOpane

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3(2002 1:15:00 PM

1,2-Dibromoethane

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00PM

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00 PM

1,2-Dichloroethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

1,2-Dlchloropropane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00 PM

I,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/20021:15:00 PM

1,3-Dlchlorobenzene

U

5,83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00 PM

1,3-Dicttloropropane

U

583

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3120021:15:00 PM

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

1213/2002

1:15:00 PM

2,2-Dichloropropane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12(3/2002 1:15:00 PM

2-Butanone

‘

U

.

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

‘

1

12/3/20021:15:00 PM

2-Chforoethyl

vinyl ether

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

2-Chiorotoluene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3(2002 1:15:00 PM

2-Hexanone

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12(3/2002 I:15~00

PM

4-Chfcrctoluene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/312002

1:15:00 PM

4-Metliyl-2-pentanone

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00 PM

Acetone

U

58.3

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

Acetonitriie

U

58.3

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

Acrolein

U

58.3

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00

PM

Acrylonltrffe

U

58.3

pg/Kg-dry

1

12(3/2002 1:15:00 PM

Benzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00

PM

Bromobenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3(2002 1:1 5:00 PM

Bromochloromethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/312002

1:15:00 PM

Bromodlchlorornethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00

PM

Bromoforrn

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

Bromomethane

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00

PM

Butylbenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

Carbon disulfide

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00

PM

Carbon

tetrachioride

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00

PM

Chlorobenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002.1:15:00

PM

Chloroethane

(1

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/20021:15:00

PM

Chloroform

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:1 5:00 PM

Chioromethane

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/312002 1:1

5:00 PM

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00 PM

cis-1,3-Dlchloropropene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00 PM

Dibromochioromethane

LI

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

1213/2002 1:15:00

PM

Page8

ofil

---

Prairie Analytical Systems,

Inc.

Date:

16-Dec-02

CLIENT:

Law

Environmental & Engineering Services

Lab Order:

0211123

Project:

McDonald’s 52000-2-2681

.

VOLATILES

ANALYSIS

-

SW8260B

Analyst:

BP

Dibromomethane

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

-

1

1213/2002

1:15:00 PM

Dichlorodifluoromethane

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1213/2002

1:15:00 PM

Ethylbenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/312002

1:15:00 PM

Hexachlorobutadiene

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

lsopropylbenzene

U

583

pg/Kg-dry

1

12(3/2002 1:15:00PM

Methyl

tert-butyl

ether

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00 PM

Methylene chloride

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/20021:15:00 PM

Naphthalene

U

14.0

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:1

5:00 PM

p-Isopropyltoluene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00

PM

Propylbenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3(2002

1:15:00PM

sec-Butylbenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12(3(2002 1:15:00PM

Styrene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00PM

tert-Butyibenzene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00 PM

Tetrachloroethene

U

5:83

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/312002

1:15:00PM

Toluene

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

‘1

12(3/2002

1:15:00 PM

trans-I

,2-Dichloroethefle

U

5.83

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:1 5:00 PM

trans-I ,3-Dichloropropene

U

5.83

~

1

12/312002 1:15:00

PM

Trichioroethene

U

583

~~/K~-d~

1

12/312002 1:1

5:00

PM

Trichlorofluoromethane

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002

1:15:00PM

Vinylacetate

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

.

I

1213120021:15:OOPM

Vinyl chloride

-

U

11.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3/2002 1:15:00PM

Xylenes,

Total

U

17.5

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/3(2002 1:15:00PM

ORGANOCHLORINE

PESTICIDES ANALYSIS

SW8O8IA

-

Analyst: SUB

4,4’-DDD

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

4,4-ODE

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

4,4’-DDT

U

0.006

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Aldrin

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

alpha-BHC

U

0.002

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

beta-BHC

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Chiardane

U

0.009

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

delta-BHC

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Dieldrin

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/5/2002

Endosulfan

I

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Endosulfan

II

U

0.011

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

EndosuWan sulfate

U

0.005

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Endrin

U

0.004

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Endrin

aldehyde

Ii

0.004

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

gamma-BHC

U

0.004

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Heptachlor

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Heptachior epoxide

U

0.003

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Methoxychlor

U

0.007

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Toxaphene

U

0.076

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS ANALYSIS

SW8082

Analyst: SUB

Aroclor 1016

U

0.688

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Page9ofll

---

Prairie Analytical Systems,

nc.

Date:

16-Dec-02

CLIENT:

Law Environrnen.tal & Engineering

Services

Lab Order:

0211123

Project:

McDonald’s 52000-2-2681

.

POLYCHLORINATED

BIPHENYLS ANALYSIS

SW8082

-

Analyst SUB

Arociorl22l

U

0.688

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Aroclor 1232

U

0.688

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Aroclor

1242

U

0.688

pg/Kg-dry

I

12(5/2002

Aroclor

1248

U

0.688

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Aroclor

1254

U

0.688

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Aroclor 1260

U

0.688

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

HERBICIDES ANALYSIS

SW8I5IA

Analyst: SUB

2,4,5-T

U

23.2

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/5/2002

2,4,5-1P (Silvex)

U

23.2

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/512002

24-0

U

232

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

24-DB

U

232

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Dalapon

U

462

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Dicarnba

U

,

.

23.2

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Dichiorprop

U

232

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Dinoseb

U

116

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

MCPA

U

4620

pg/Kg-dry

I

12/512002

MCPP

U

4620

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

Penlachiorophenoi

U

23.2

pg/Kg-dry

1

12/5/2002

PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS

02216

Analyst RN

PercentMolsture

14.3

-

0.01

wt°fo

1

12(3/2002

Page

10 of 11

---

Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc..

Qualifiers:

B

-

Analyte detected in the associated method blank.

E

-

Value

above quantitationrange.

H

-

Analysis performedpast

holding

time.

HT

-

Sample

received

past holding

time.

I

-

Analyte

detected between

RL

andMDL.

R

-

RPD outside acceptance limits.

S

-

SpIke recovexy outside

acceptance limits.

U

-

Analyte

not

detected (I.e. less thanRL

or MDL).

Page

11

of 11

---

—

.

U

iast~i~i.~

rrairiG

Systems,

INCORPORATED

Ms.CarmenYung

-

Law

Environmental & Engineering Services

5440 N. Cumberland Ave

Chicago, IL

60656

RE:

McDonalds 52000-2-2681-10

DearMsCarmen Yung:.

It~L).I:~-~)

i_s

-

301041

•

Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc.

received 3 samples on 1/10/2003 ~or

the analyses presented in

the following- repott.

.

-

.

-

.

-

-

-

-

All applicable quility control procedures met method specific acc eptance criteria.

This report shailfiot be reproduced, except in full,

without the.prior~ittenconsentofPrairie

Analytical Systeths, Inc.

-

.

.

-.

-

.

.

.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (217)

75~

-1148.

-

Sincerely,

-~-

.

-

-

-

-

January 29, 2003

Testing Labor~aroty

1265

Capital Airport

Dnve

Springfield,

IL

62707-8490

Phone:

217-753-114.8

--

FAX:

217-753-1152

---

CL~.

-

of L

tod’.

-

-

.

j

Rw,juiê~ij

1285 CapItal

Airport

Drive

-

Springfield, IL

62707-8490

-

Phone (217) 753-1148

-

FacsImI?~

(217) 763-1152

-

E-mail

lL100323@aol.com

ri—giiri~

~

i’uuuiy LIbøl

Systems,

Client

Address

CIty,

State

ZIp Code

Phone/FacsImile No.

Contact

Person

LP~i~~

~

~

~

.

~44

p

.

~

~

L~i~i

I)

~J

~

~

~

o

T_/_

~

~,

~

~

3~

p4~..O

I

~3tj_4~

~

(

3

c~-~rz~j

@‘~J ~~.i

~

Client Project

Project Location

Sampler(s)

I

Phone No.

TumaroundTlme

-

P.O. #

or Invoice

To

-~

~

,4~

ku)

~

—

I

C

I

~,

k~.

~

4)

~

-.~r(~~-

t’r~L~

e~.

~

~

.-;

~

o

~,

Standard

C)

Rushj~Date Required:

*

I

7_

~

2..

~4.j~4

~J

~1

tJts.t~

Sample

DescriptIon

Sampling

Container

3M

,4

P

AnalysIs

and

/ or Method Requested1

PAS Sample

Number

(10

Characters Only)

Date

Time

1Size

‘Type

(No.

Code

(if

there are

any questions, please

call.)

Accepted

I

Rejected

~-otL

~1LEc~

3

~

9~’o~L~)L~

4

I-~

-1

I

I

\V

L~

~

~

to~lo~4

.

k°’~

~

(

I

.

~.jL

.

/4

/~

q

‘I

~Jf

I

—

I

I

I

I

•

I

I

~IrL..

/~

-‘1

1j1

\~j(

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

\jL9~

~tJQCç

~

~9f~4ç

I

,~-

~,J:R~i-

~t4J~

•

:...

i

-

.

-

..

.

.

-

•

-

:

~

: ~H

•

~

-

...

AR1

A(

A(R

A(JRJ

MIRE

A(R(

AER(I

A(IR.(J

A(R(

A(JRf

AR(

AR)

Size ofConatlner

40mL

-

125 mL

250 mL

500

mL

1000mL

0

-

Other (Specify)

2T~eofContainer

G

-

Glass (Clear)

AG

-

Glass (Amber)

P

-

HOPE

• VC

-

Volatile Core

SC

-

SoilCore

0- Other(Specify)

M

=

Matrix Code

A

-

Aqueous

OW

-

Drinking Water

NA

-

Non-aqueous Liquid

-

SE

-

SalineWater

-

S

-

Solids

0-

Other (Specify)

P

=

PreservativeCode

A

-

None

—

RelinquishedBy

wtQ~

B

-

HNO,

•

-

C~.tl~SO..._s

0-Na

Date

Time

‘

Receive

f-I

~

E

-

‘-lCl

•

Date

Time

~“-~

/~“~

0-Other

(Specify)

MethodofShipment

ft~T

~Special

Instructions:

.

PAS Project Code

-

PAS-COC 186.185(b)

Pa9e

______

of

______

Copies:

White-Client

Yellow-PAS,

Inc.

Fink

-

Sampler

---

Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc.

Date:

29-Jan-03

CLIENT:

Law

Environmenial & EngineeringService

Lab Order:

0301041

Project:

McDonalds

52000-2-2681-10

Lab

ID:

0301041001

Collection Date:

1/9/2003

Client

Sample ID:

soil pile 2

Matrix;

SOLID

Analyses

•

Result

Limit

Qual

Units

DF

Date Analyzed

METALSANALYSIS

E200.B

(SW3O5OB)

Analyst:

MCL

Arsenic

13.7

2.05

mg/Kg-dry

10

1/14/2003

6:51:00

PM

Barium

41.7

2.05

mg/Kg-dry

10

1/14/20036:51:00

PM

Cadmium

U

2.05

mg/Kg-dry

10

1/14/2003 6:51:00PM

Chromium

14.5

10.2

mg/Kg-dry

50

1/14/20038:19:00 PM

Lead

24.0

2.05

mg/Kg-dry

10

1/14/2003 6:51:00

PM

Mercury

U

0.410

mg/Kg-dry

10

1/14/2003 6:51 :00

PM

Selenium

U

2.05

mg/Kg-dry

10

1/1 4/2003 6:51:00

PM

Silver

U

2.05

mg/Kg-dry

10

1/14/2003 6:51 :00

PM

SEMIVOLATILES

ANALYSIS

SW8270C

(SW3550B)

Analyst

JA

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

1,3-Dichiorobenzene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00AM

1

,4-Dichlorobenzene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

2,4,5-Trichiorophenol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00

AM

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

2,4-Dichlorophenol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14(20034:59:00AM

2,4-Dimethyiphenol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003

4:59:00 AM

2,4-Dinitrophenol

U

1960

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14120034:59:00AM

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

U

785

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00 AM

2.6-Dinitrotoluerte

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003

4:59:00

AM

2-Chloronaphthalene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

2-Chlorophenol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

-

1

1114/20034:59:00AM

2-Methylnaphthalene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00 AM

2-Methytphenol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00

AM

2-Nitroaniline

U

1960

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14(20034:59:00AM

2-Nitropheriol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

3 &4-Methyiphenol

U

785

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14120034:59:00AM

3,3~-DichIorobenzidine

U

785

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

3-Nitroaniline

-

U

1960

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00 AM

4,6-Dinitro-2-methyiphenol

U

1960

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003

4:59:00AM

4-Bromophenyl phenyt ether

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

4-Chioro-3-methylphenol

U

785

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

4-Chioroaniline

U

785

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/1 4/2003 4:59:00AM

4-Chiorophenyl phenyl ether

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

4-Nitroanhline

U

785

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

4-Nitrophenol

U

1960

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

Acenaphthene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14120034:59:OOAM

Acenaphthylene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/1412003

4:59:00 AM

Aniline

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00

AM

Page

1

of

16

---

Prairie Analytical Systems,

Inc.

Date:

29-Jan-03

CLIENT:

Law

Environxnental & Engineering

Service

Lab Order:

0301041

Project:

McDonalds 52000-2-2681-10

SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS

SWB2TOC

(SW3550B)

Analyst

JA

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14(2003 4:59:00 AM

Benzo(a)anthracene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

Benzo(a)pyrene

U

392

pglKg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00 AM

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

Benzo(g,h,i)per)4ene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00AM

Benzo(k)ffuoranthene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1114/2003 4:59:00 AM

Benzoicacid

U

1960

pglkg-dry

1

1114/2003 4:59:00AM

Benzyl

alcohol

U

785

pg/Kg-dry

•

1

1/1412003 4:59:00 AM

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane

U

392

pg/Kg-city

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1(14(20034:59:00 AM

Bis(2-chloroisopropyi)ether

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1)1412003 4:59:00 AM

Bis(2-ethyihexyi)phthalate

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003

4:59:00 AM

Butyl benzyl phthaJate

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00 AM

Carbazoie

•

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

‘1

1/14120034:59:00 AM

Chrysene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003

4:59:00 AM

DI-n-butyl

phthalate

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1114120034:59:00 AM

Di-n-octyi

phthalate

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00

AM

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1114/2003 4:59:00AM

Dibenzot~.rran

U

1960

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/1

4/20034:59:00 AM

Diethylphthalate

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14120034:59:00AM

Diniethyi

phthalate

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00AM

Fluoranthene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1114/20034:59:00AM

Fluorene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00AM

Hexachlorobenzene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

111412003

4:59:00AM

Hexachlorobutadiene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

I-~hlrtirlnn~nta1i~nR

U

•

785

pg/Kg-.dry

1

1/1412003

4:59:00AM

1-lexachioroethane

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003

4:59:00 AM

indeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14(2003 4:59:00 AM

isophorone

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00AM

N-Nitrosodi-n-propyiamine

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1114/20034:59:00AM

N-Nitrosodimethylamirre

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14(2003

4:59:00 AM

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

I

ill

4/2003

4:59:00 AM

Naphthalene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/1 4/2003 4:59:00 AM

Nitrobenzene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

Pentachiorophenol

U

1960

pg/Kg-dry

1

1(14/20034:59:00 AM

Pherianthrene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/2003 4:59:00 AM

Phenol

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1(14/2003

4:59:00 AM

Pyrene

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/14/20034:59:00 AM

Pyridine

-

U

392

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/14(20034:59:OOAM

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES ANALYSIS

SW8270C

(SW3550B)

Analyst: JA

4,4’-DDD

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1(23/2003 2:40:00 PM

4,4’-DDE

U

41.6

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003 2:40:00

PM

4,4-DDT

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1(23/2003 2:40:00 PM

~Jachior

U

17.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1123/20032:40:00PM

Page 2 of 16

---

Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc.

Date:

29-Jan-03

CLIENT:

Law Environmental & Engineering Service

Lab Order:

0301041

Projects

McDonalds 52000-2-2681-10

ORGANOCHLORINE

PESTICIDES ANALYSIS

SW8270C

(SW3550B)

Analyst:

JA

Adrin

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

alpha-BHC

U

17.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003 2:40:00 PM

aipha-Chiordane

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

Atrazine

U

178

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

beta-SHC

U

17.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

Chlorobenziiate

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

DCPA

U

17.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003

2:40:00

PM

deita-Bi-IC

U

23.7

~

1

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

Dieldrin

U

35.6

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003

2:40:00 PM

Errdosulfan

I

U

47.5

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003 2:40:00 PM

Endosulfan II

U

29.7

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/23/2003

2:40:00 PM

Endosulfan sulfate

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003

2:40:00 PM

Endrin

U

41.6

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/20032:40:00PM

Endrin

aidehyde

U

35.5

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003 2:40:00PM

Endrin Icetone

U

0

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/20032:40:00PM

gamma-BHC

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003

2:40:00 PM

gamma-Chlordane

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23(20032:40:00 PM

I-ie~tachlor

U

17.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1(23/20032:40:00 PM

Heptachlorepoxide

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

112312003

2:40:00

PM

Methoxychior

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23120032:40:00PM

Perrnethrin

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003

2:40:00 PM

Simazine

U

23.7

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

Toxaphene

U

59.4

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/23/2003 2:40:00 PM

trans-Nonachlor

U

237

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/23/20032:40:00 PM

VOLATILES ANALYSIS

SW82603

Analyst:

BP

1,1,I.2-Tetrachloroethane

U

590

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22)2003

1:13:00

PM

1,1

,I-Trichloroethane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00

PM

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22(2003

1:13:00PM

1,I.2-.Trfchloroethane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00

PM

I,1-Dichioroethane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22(2003

1:13:00 PM

1,1-Dichioroethene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003

1:13:00 PM

1,1-Dichloropropene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00

PM

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzerre

1)

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003

1:13:00 PM

12,3-Trichloropropane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00 PM

I 2,4-Trichlorobenzene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/2212003

1:13:00PM

I ,2,4-Trimethyibenzene

U

5_go

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00 PM

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

U

11.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003

1:13:00

PM

1,2-Oibromoethane

U

11.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22(2003 1:13:00 PM

1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00

PM

1,2-Dichioroethane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00

PM

1

,2-Oichloropropane

U

590

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00 PM

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/22/2003 1:13:00 PM

I ,3-Dichlorobenzene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003

1:13:00

PM

1,3-Dichloropropane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22(2003 1:13:00

PM

Page

3

of 16

---

Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc.

Date:

29-Jan-03

CLIENT:

Law

Environniental

&

Engineering

Service

Lab Order:

0301041

Project:

McDonalds 52000-2-2681-10

VOLATILES ANALYSIS

SW8260B

Analyst BP

1

,4-Dichtorobenzene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00

PM

2,2-Dichioropropane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/22(2003

1:13:00 PM

2-Butanone

U

11.8

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003

1:13:00 PM

2-Chioroethyl vinyl ether

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/22(2003 1:13:00PM

2-Chiorotoluene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/22i2003 1:13:00PM

2-Hexanone

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/2212003 1:13:00PM

4-Chlorotouene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1122/2003 1:13:00PM

4-Methyl-2-pentanone

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22.12003 1:13:00PM

Acetone

U

59.0

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/20031:1 3:00PM

Acetonitrile

U

59.0

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:1

3:00

PM

Acrolein

U

59.0

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/2003 1:13:00PM

Acrylonitrile

U

59.0

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22)2003 1:13:00PM

Benzene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/22/20031:13:OOPM

Brornobenzene

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/20031:1 3:00PM

Bromochioromethane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

1

1/22/20031:13:00PM

Bromodichlorometliane

U

5.90

pg/Kg-dry

I

1/22120031:13:00PM