IN THE MATTER OF:
PETITION OFARGONNE NATIONAL
LABORATORY FOR AN ADJUSTED
STAN)ARD FROM
35
ILL. ADM. CODE 218.182
TO:
Dorothy Guim, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R.
Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
William D. Luck
Assistant General Counsel
Argonne National Labortory
9700 5.
Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
SEP
042003.
STATE OF
ILL’rs401s
AS
03-04
PO!/Utjofl Control Board
(Adjusted Standard
-
Air)
Bradley Halloran, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Gloria Walach, Counsel
U.S. Department ofEnergy.
9800 5.
Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
PLEASE
TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office ofthe Pollution
Control Board the TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL D. ROGERS ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, a copy ofwhich is herewith served upon you.
Date:
September 2, 2003
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O.
Box
19276
Spring field, IL 62794-9276
217/782-5544
•
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
By:
Rachel L.
octors
Assistant Counsel
Division ofLegal Counsel
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON
RECYCLED PAPER
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROLBOARD
R~cs
Qr’i~r,-~
)
)
)
)
)
)
NOTICE
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
CLERK’S OFF~~’p
SEP
0
4
2003
INTHE MATTER OF:
)
)
AS 03-4
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
PETITION OF ARGONNE NATIONAL
)
(Air
—
Adjusted
Standâ~fd~t10fl
Control Board
LABORATORIES FOR AN ADJUSTED
)
STANDARD FROM
)
35
ILL. ADM~
CODE 218.182
)
Testimony ofMichael D. Rogers
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
September 2003
Good morning.
My name is Mike Rogers and I am in the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency’s Bureau of Air.
I was involved in the development ofthe regulation
establishing the maximum vapor pressure limits for solvents used in cold cleaning and in
conversations with Argonne concerning this adjusted standard petition.
Cold cleaning is defined in Title
35,
Subtitle B, Section 211.1310 as “the process
of cleaning and removing soils
from surfaces by spraying, brushing, flushing, or
-
immersion while maintaining the organic solvent below its boiling point.
Wipe cleaning
is not included in this definition.”
Section 218.182 contains requirements for operating
procedures, equipment requirements, material requirements, and recordkeeping
requirements.
Cold
cleaning is primarily conducted to clean metal parts.
Such cleaning likely
takes place at all manufacturing operations, as well as at auto repair facilities, machine
shops and metal fabrication and finishing operations.
Cold cleaning degreasers range in
size but typically consist of a small sink or vat where components are sprayed and
brushed clean,
connecting hoses, and a holding tank containing from five to 30 gallons of
solvent. The solvent is usually used at ambient temperatures, but if it is heated, the
temperature is.kept below the solvent’s boiling point.
Solvent degreasing equipment and
degreasing solvents are typically supplied by the same companies.
The operating procedures and equipment requirements ofSection 218.182
(a) and
(b) are geared to this type ofcleaning equipment.
These include requirements regarding
the degreaser cover, spray apparatus, and drainage device.
The material requirements
contained in Section 2 18.182(c), effective in March 2001, limit the sale or use ofsolvents
in cold cleaning to those with a maximum vapor pressure of 1.0 millimeter ofmercury
(mm Hg), measured at 20°C (68°F).
Section 218.1 82(d)(2) requires that records of
solvent purchases be maintained in order to verify the purchase ofcompliant
solvents.
All of these requirements
are intended to reduce the evaporation ofthe solvent
being used.
The evaporation ofhydrocarbon-based solvents releases volatile organic
material (VOM) into the atmosphere.
The higher the vapor pressure ofa substance the
more readily it evaporates.
These emissions react with other pollutants on warm sfinny
days to produce ozone.
Elevated ozone concentrations in the lower atmosphere can
impair breathing function especially in the young, the elderly,
and those with existing
respiratory diseases such as asthma or bronchitis.
The Illinois EPA estimates that VOM
emissions in the Chicago areaare being reduced by approximately 22 tons per day from
1998 levels due to the implementation ofthe regulation.
Although technically cold cleaning, the research and development testing and
analysis activities performed by Argonne are not the typical activities intended to
be
affected by the cold cleaning regulations.
Argonne has requested relief for its
operations
that involve preparation of sample material and the associated apparatus used for research
and development testing and analysis stating that such testing “requires sample surface
areas completely free ofresidual contamination.”
The Agency has been made.aware that
solvents complying with the vapor pressure limits may not adequately perform under
certain “high tech” cleaning requirements.
The cleaning of electronic components is one
example that was brought to light during the rulemaking development and accordingly
addressed in the regulation.
The Agency acknowledges that Argonne’s specified
activities and cleanliness requirements are unique from typical cold cleaning operations.
In addition, Argonne’s activity does not utilize the typical cold cleaning apparatus
c
described above, using milliliters of solvent rather than gallons, and laboratory beakers
rather than a sink.
Argonne states that it has researched the use of alternative solvents either
complying with the specified vapor pressure limits or consisting ofnon-volatile organic
material, suchas acetone,
but that no suitable complying solvent could be found.
The
Agency is aware that cleaning solvents have their limitations especially in circumstances
that require such a high degree ofcleanliness.
The Agency is also aware of the
flammable nature ofsolvents such as acetone, which may be classified as a non-VOM but
have other deleterious characteristics.
Argonne estimates that its method of cleaning and the use ofsolvents exceeding
the vapor pressure limits would result in a maximum increase
in VOM emissions ofone
(1) ton per year.
In the 1999
inventory ofChicago nonattainment area ozone precursor
emissions the Illinois EPA estimates that approximately 660 tons ofman-made VOM
emissions are generated each summer day in the six-county region.
Therefore, the
Illinois EPA believes that the additional emissions resulting from Argonne’s research and
development testing and analysis activities and requested use ofsolvents exceeding the
vapor pressure limits is negligible and will not negatively affect Chicago area air quality.
Based on the above, I support the Agency’s recommendation to the Board that
Argonne’s Petition for adjusted standard be granted, subject to the conditions included in
the Recommendation.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF SANGAMON
)
)SS.
)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached Testimony ofMichael D.
Rogers upon the person to
whom it is
directed, by placing it in an envelope
addressed to:
TO:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
William D. Luck
Assistant General Counsel
Argonne National Labortory
9700 5.
Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
Bradley Halloran, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60661
Gloria Walach, Counsel
U.S. Department ofEnergy
9800 S. Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
and mailing it by First Class Mail from Springfield, Illinois on September 2, 2003, with
sufficient postage affixed.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
this
2uid
day ofSeptember, 2003
Notary Public
SEAL
-
~.
NOTARy
PUBLIC
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
COMMISSION
EXPIRES
I ~-I4-2OQ5?