ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April 17, 2003
     
    IN THE MATTER OF: )
    )
    PETITION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS LIGHT ) R02-21
    COMPANY (E.D. EDWARDS ) (Site-Specific
    GENERATING STATION) FOR A ) Rulemaking – Air)
    SITE-SPECIFIC AIR REGULATION: )
    35 ILL. ADM. CODE 214.561 )
     
    Proposed Rule. Second Notice.
     
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by T.E. Johnson):
     
    This matter comes before the Board upon a proposal for site-specific rulemaking filed by
    Central Illinois Light Company (E.D. Edwards Generating Station) (CILCO) pursuant to Section
    27 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (Act). 415 ILCS 5/27 (2000). CILCO operates
    the E.D. Edwards Generating Station (facility) located near Peoria in Peoria County.
    Specifically, CILCO requests a site-specific sulfur dioxide emissions limit for Boiler #2 at its
    facility. A hearing in this matter was held on October 11, 2002.
     
    By today’s action the Board adopts the proposed rule for second notice, pursuant to the
    Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/1-1). No comments were received during
    first notice, and the proposal adopted here is substantively unchanged from that adopted in the
    Board’s January 23, 2003 first-notice and opinion order. The following opinion will explain the
    proposal background, summarize the first-notice proposal, and discuss the economic
    reasonableness and technical feasibility of the rule.
     
    BACKGROUND
     
    CILCO’s facility consists of three coal-fired boilers. CILCO received a variance from 35
    Ill. Adm. Code 214.141 in a Board order issued on April 15, 1999.
    See
    Central Illinois Light
    Company v. IEPA, PCB 99-80 (Apr. 15, 1999). The variance is effective through July 31, 2003.
    Boilers 1 and 3 are subject to a sulfur dioxide emission limit under a site-specific rule at 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 214.561. Boiler 2 is subject to sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions limit under 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 214.141.
     
    CILCO seeks to make permanent the relief it was granted in PCB 99-80 by amending 35
    Ill. Adm. Code 214.561 with respect to the requirements for the operation of Boiler 2. CILCO
    requests that the Board repeal the text of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 214.561 and replace it verbatim with
    text from the variance order of April 15, 1999.
    See
    CILCO, PCB 99-80 slip op. at 8-9. The
    Board has previously incorporated by reference the record of PCB 99-80.
     
    Specifically, CILCO requests that Section 214.561 read as follows:
     

     
    2
    Sulfur dioxide emissions from Boiler Nos. 1, 2, and 3 at the Edwards Station may not
    exceed the limits listed below. CILCO must determine compliance with these limits on a
    daily basis using the sulfur dioxide methodology of the Phase II Acid Rain Program set
    forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 75.
     
    a. The average sulfur dioxide emissions from Boiler Nos. 1, 2,and 3, as a
    group may not exceed 4.71 pounds per million British thermal units
    (lb/mmBtu) of actual heat input;
    b. The average sulfur dioxide emissions from any one boiler may not exceed
    6.6 lb/mmBtu of actual heat input; and
    c. Sulfur dioxide emissions for all three boilers, as a group, may not exceed
    34,613 pounds per hour, on a 24-hour average basis.
       
    PROCEDURAL HISTORY
     
    On February 28, 2002, CILCO filed a petition for an adjusted standard pursuant to
    Section 28.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) 415 ILCS 5/28.1 (2000). On March 21,
    2002, the Board issued an order reserving judgment on the acceptance of this case until CILCO
    addressed whether or not the relief requested by CILCO is contrary to the Act and the
    Administrative Procedures Act, (5 ILCS 100/1-1
    et seq
    . (2000)) in that CILCO is requesting the
    amendment of a rule in an adjusted standard proceeding.
     
    On April 26, 2002, CILCO filed a motion to file an amended pleading and a proposal for
    site-specific rulemaking. In the motion, CILCO requests that the Board accept the proposal for
    site-specific rulemaking as an amendment to the February 28, 2002 filing. CILCO represents
    that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) was apprised of the motion and had
    no objection.
     
    On May 2, 2002, the Board closed the docket in AS02-4 and opened regulatory docket
    R02-21. The Board found that the proposal for rulemaking met the requirements of 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 102.210 and accepted it for hearing.
     
    A hearing in this matter was held on October 11, 2002, at 202 N.E. Madison in Peoria.
    Both CILCO and the Agency appeared and presented testimony at the hearing. The testimony
    offered by the parties was summarized in the Board’s January 23, 2003 first-notice opinion and
    order. No members of the public attended the hearing. The only public comment after the
    hearing was filed by CILCO.
        
    In its first-notice opinion and order, the Board found that adoption of CILCO’s proposed
    site-specific rule for the purposes of first notice was warranted. The Board found that CILCO
    presented information indicating that compliance with 35 Ill. Adm. Code 214.141 is not
    economically reasonable or technically feasible. The Board further found that CILCO
     
    presented
    evidence regarding the nature of existing air quality and consistency with federal regulations.
     

     
    3
    The first notice publication of the rules appeared in 27
    Illinois Register
    2578 (February
    14, 2003). No public comments were received during the 45-day first notice period. The Joint
    Committee on Administrative Review (JCAR) filed non-substantive comments addressing
    grammar and format changes.
     
    DISCUSSION
     
    At first notice, the Board found that compliance with 35 Ill. Adm. Code 214.141 was not
    economically reasonable or technically feasible. The Board has received no additional
    comments discussing economic reasonableness and technical feasibility of the proposed rule. On
    August 14, 2002, pursuant to Section 27(b) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/27(b) (2000)), the Board
    requested that the Department of Commerce and Community Affairs (DCCA) conduct an
    economic impact study on the proposed rule. The request letter referenced a letter, dated March
    10, 2000, from DCCA. The March 10, 2000 letter informed the Board that DCCA would not be
    doing economic impact studies. At the October 11, 2002 hearing the Board made available
    copies of the DCCA letter and the Board's March 12, 2002 letter. The Board received no
    comments on the letter.
     
    As noted, the Board did receive non-substantive comments from JCAR. The Board has
    incorporated the suggested changes into the proposal as issued for second-notice review.
     
    CONCLUSION
     
     
      
    Based on the record developed to date in this matter, the Board finds that adoption of
    CILCO’s proposed site-specific rule is warranted. The Board proposes this rulemaking for
    second-notice review by JCAR.
     
    ORDER
     
    The Board directs the Clerk to cause the filing of the following with the Joint Committee
    on Administrative Rules for its second-notice review.
     
    TITLE 35: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    SUBTITLE B: AIR POLLUTION
    CHAPTER I: POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    SUBCHAPTER c: EMISSION STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS
    FOR STATIONARY SOURCES
     
    PART 214
    SULFUR LIMITATIONS
     
    SUBPART A: GENERAL PROVISIONS
     
    Section
    214.100 Scope and Organization
    214.101 Measurement Methods

     
    4
    214.102 Abbreviations and Units
    214.103 Definitions
    214.104 Incorporations by Reference
     
    SUBPART B: NEW FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSION SOURCES
     
    Section
     
    214.120 Scope
    214.121 Large Sources
    214.122 Small Sources
     
    SUBPART C: EXISTING SOLID FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSION SOURCES
     
    Section
     
    214.140 Scope
    214.141 Sources Located in Metropolitan Areas
    214.142 Small Sources Located Outside Metropolitan Areas
    214.143 Large Sources Located Outside Metropolitan Areas
     
    SUBPART D: EXISTING LIQUID OR MIXED FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSION SOURCES
     
    Section
     
    214.161 Liquid Fuel Burned Exclusively
    214.162 Combination of Fuels
     
    SUBPART E: AGGREGATION OF SOURCES OUTSIDE METROPOLITAN AREAS
     
    Section
     
    214.181 Dispersion Enhancement Techniques
    214.182 Prohibition
    214.183 General Formula
    214.184 Special Formula
    214.185 Alternative Emission Rate
    214.186 New Operating Permits
     
     
     
    SUBPART F: ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS FOR SOURCES INSIDE METROPOLITAN
    AREAS
     
    Section
     
    214.201 Alternative Standards for Sources in Metropolitan Areas
    214.202 Dispersion Enhancement Techniques
     
    SUBPART K: PROCESS EMISSION SOURCES
     

     
    5
    Section
    214.300 Scope
    214.301 General Limitation
    214.302 Exception for Air Pollution Control Equipment
    214.303 Use of Sulfuric Acid
    214.304 Fuel Burning Process Emission Source
     
    SUBPART O: PETROLEUM REFINING, PETROCHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL
    MANUFACTURING
     
    Section
     
    214.380 Scope
    214.381 Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing
    214.382 Petroleum and Petrochemical Processes
    214.383 Chemical Manufacturing
    214.384 Sulfate and Sulfite Manufacturing
     
    SUBPART P: STONE, CLAY, GLASS AND CONCRETE PRODUCTS
     
    Section
     
    214.400 Scope
    214.401 Glass Melting and Heat Treating
    214.402 Lime Kilns
     
    SUBPART Q: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY METAL MANUFACTURING
     
    Section
     
    214.420 Scope
    214.421 Combination of Fuels at Steel Mills in Metropolitan Areas
    214.422 Secondary Lead Smelting in Metropolitan Areas
    214.423 Slab Reheat Furnaces in St. Louis Area
     
    SUBPART V: ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS
     
    Section
    214.521 Winnetka Power Plant
     
    SUBPART X: UTILITIES
     
    Section
    214.560 Scope
    214.561 E. D. Edwards Electric Generating Station
    214.562 Coffeen Generating Station
     
    Appendix A Rule into Section Table
    Appendix B Section into Rule Table

     
    6
    Appendix C Method used to Determine Average Actual Stack Height and Effective Heig
    Effluent Release
    Appendix D Past Compliance Dates
     
    AUTHORITY: Implementing Section 10 and authorized by Section 27 of the Environmental
    Protection Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 111 1/2, pars. 1010 and 1027) (415 ILCS 5/10 and 27
    (2002)).
     
    SOURCE: Adopted as Chapter 2: Air Pollution, Rule 204: Sulfur Emission Standards and
    Limitations, R71-23, 4 PCB 191, filed and effective April 14, 1972; amended in R74-2 and R75-
    5, 32 PCB 295, at 3 Ill. Reg. 5, p. 777, effective February 3, 1979; amended in R74-2, R75-5, 38
    PCB 129, at 4 Ill. Reg. 28, p. 417, effective June 26, 1980; amended in R78-17, 40 PCB 291, at 5
    Ill. Reg. 1892, effective February 17, 1981; amended in R77-15, 44 PCB 267, at 6 Ill. Reg. 2146,
    effective January 28, 1982; amended and renumbered in R80-22(A), at 7 Ill. Reg. 4219, effective
    March 28, 1983; codified 7 Ill. Reg. 13597; amended in R80-22(B), at 8 Ill. Reg. 6172, effective
    April 24, 1984; amended in R84-28, at 10 Ill. Reg. 9806, effective May 20, 1986; amended in
    R86-31, at 12 Ill. Reg. 17387, effective October 14, 1988; amended in R86-30, at 12 Ill. Reg.
    20778, effective December 5, 1988; amended in R87-31 at 15 Ill. Reg. 1017, effective January
    15, 1991; amended in R02-21 at 27 Ill. Reg. ___________, effective __________.
     
    SUBPART X: UTILITIES
     
    Section 214.561 E. D. Edwards Electric Generating Station
     
    Sulfur dioxide emissions from Boiler Nos. 1, 2, and 3 at the Edwards Station may not exceed the
    limits listed below in this Section. CILCO must determine compliance with these limits on a
    daily basis using the sulfur dioxide methodology of the Phase II Acid Rain Program set forth in
    40 C.F.R. Part 75.
     
    a) The average sulfur dioxide emissions from Boiler Nos. 1, 2, and 3, as a group
    may not exceed 4.71 pounds per million British thermal units (lb/mmBtu) of
    actual heat input;
     
    b) The average sulfur dioxide emissions from any one boiler may not exceed 6.6
    lb/mmBtu of actual heat input; and
     
    c) Sulfur dioxide emissions for all three boilers, as a group, may not exceed 34,613
    pounds per hour, on a 24-hour average basis.
     
    Units 1 and 3 at the E. D. Edwards Electric Generating Station shall not exceed 6.6 pounds of
    sulfur dioxide per mmBtu of actual heat input (2,838 nanograms per joule). Aggregate emissions
    from the E. D. Edwards Electric Generating Station on a 24-hour average basis shall not exceed
    34,613 pounds of sulfur dioxide per hour.
     
    (Source: Added at 10 Ill. Reg. 9806, effective May 20, 1986)
     

     
    7
    (Source: Amended at
    , effective
    )
     
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
     
    Board Member M.E. Tristano abstained.
     
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
    adopted the above opinion and order on April 17, 2003, by a vote of 5-0.
     
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
     

    Back to top