ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    C3kTT~3L
    ILCAPD
    March
    7,
    1972
    GODFREY
    TOWNSHIP
    UTILITY
    BOAPD
    v~
    )
    P0.3
    72—60
    EN7IRONBtENTAL
    PROTECTION
    hGENCY
    OPINION
    OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by
    Mr;
    XissaJ
    The
    Cod
    frey
    Townshio
    U
    LL1:L
    Lv
    Bcard
    (
    “Taavrishiu
    Ii. led
    a
    petition
    on
    February
    23,
    3.972,
    ~atinrj
    a
    ~a:ianca
    loom
    ~t~o
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    Lor
    its
    n:~—cu1i
    lo~oons
    at:
    ~aun~j~
    blood,
    Black
    Creek
    and
    CoaL
    Branch
    arid
    for
    I
    L5
    ::Lrea--ca
    aacjooris
    at
    Waoror~—LevLs
    and
    Monticello,
    Th~ Tomnship
    asks
    ala
    tan
    !loacd
    grant
    it
    a
    one—year
    variance
    is.
    o~d~i that
    it
    con
    co;alLeta
    Laoa
    and
    cons truction
    of
    irapro\remnr:tn
    to
    3
    to
    nXiota::Cr
    ~yo
    t.~-n.
    The
    Lcmn—
    ship
    on LLnateo
    that
    sur:h
    ~nrtCv3c2n;..o
    c.:annou
    ha
    comc~.uted ostil
    Februar~
    1974
    ,
    about
    a
    a
    halL I
    af
    Lao
    do
    .na
    date
    in
    st~7:-
    14
    fo~
    ~
    ~
    ~r:~
    ‘~wrnl
    :r;
    aloe
    asks
    thn~
    the
    Laard
    lift
    the
    scuar
    conaact
    ~Oa
    has
    ~:io~~
    tlinA~oncv
    has
    jam-
    posed
    ar1
    the
    Township
    due
    to
    Lb
    .~
    an
    aly
    o~acv~overloacio.d
    condition
    of
    the
    lagoons
    at
    prenena
    On
    the
    face
    of
    the
    petition,
    the
    Board
    a’cu~d have
    no
    caoicc
    but
    to
    deny
    the
    Township~o
    sequent.
    ho
    indication
    in
    g~von as
    to
    why
    it
    is
    necessary
    to
    ~ait
    until
    .Lobruary
    ,
    1974,
    for
    ca:n::etion
    of
    the
    new
    treatment
    facilities.
    In
    addition,
    the
    To.•:nnain
    nra
    thn~
    the
    Board
    lift
    the
    newer
    ban
    eton
    thoaql
    tha
    Tc.a’r:sh.In
    ap:.or
    :o LI
    plans
    no
    interim
    measures
    to
    raise
    its
    effluant
    quaii
    to.
    Pal
    thit~
    I,
    submitted
    with
    the
    variance
    petition,
    praneitaJy
    shows
    an
    cffluar~
    quality
    ~reatly
    in
    eacess
    of
    state
    standards,
    Further,
    we
    ‘aoulcli
    ca3
    1
    thu
    Township’s
    attentfcn
    ~o
    Sections
    194
    ~c)
    (iii.1
    ,
    and
    404(1)
    (1)
    of
    the
    Water
    Quality
    St.
    r1daods
    (R7l~-1.4
    adc~ted
    March
    7,
    :1.972)
    ~
    it
    nertairs
    to
    she
    aeration
    of
    a
    threc—stagn
    lagoon.
    Sa.nce
    1113. a
    case
    doos
    co~~eerri.s
    municinali
    tan
    ehi cii
    Oas
    &paa;ec~tly
    been
    acting
    in
    qooJ.
    faith,
    we
    will
    not
    oismii~a this
    petit.~on
    “uc
    CL~o~5n~i
    cvlnVlrrOrif
    ~
    1(5L.~_Oi
    Agency,
    P0:9
    72—94,
    dated
    enruary
    2:.
    ,
    1.C)
    72,
    dathor
    ,
    a
    God nitty
    TcMnseop
    Utility
    Board
    will
    be
    giver:
    an
    additional
    cwcntv
    (203
    days
    wi thin
    which
    to
    file
    an
    amended
    variance
    etit-.:Lon
    do Lail.ing
    the
    reasons
    for
    1-lu-’
    delay.

    I,
    CI’::itafl
    I..
    4otfott,
    ClcsrI:
    cC
    the
    Pojiutiort
    Conttol
    tzr.rd,
    cer’tii!Y
    tn~t t.~o
    Board
    t~~iptc’.ithe
    abn7’t
    Cr~iaiofl en~ Order
    this
    clay
    oZ
    !aroh,
    1972,
    Is’
    e’vcte
    of
    ____
    /.
    s—pu

    Back to top