ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March
    7,
    1972
    CONSOLIDATED ALUMINUM CORPORATION
    #71—383
    V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (BY MR. LAWTON):
    On June
    23, 1971,
    a variance order was entered in favor of
    Phelps Dodge Aluminum Corporation, now Consolidated Aluminum Corpora-
    tion, granting
    a variance until December 23,
    1971 allowing petitioner
    to
    burn
    magnesium
    waste
    in
    the
    open,
    subject
    to
    the
    terms
    and
    conditions
    set
    forth
    in
    the
    order,#7l-66. Petitioner, by this proceeding,seeks an addi-
    tional six months in which to continue the open burning of magnesium
    chips, pending development and completion of a chip compacter which,
    if proven satisfactory, will enable the melting of pellets without the
    need for the burning of magnesium chips.
    As stated in our earlier opinion, Petitioner’s Madison, Illinois
    plant engages in casting, extruding and rolling of magnesium and alumi-
    num mill grade products.
    Twenty million pounds of magnesium primary
    ingot are processed each year,
    generating between 150 to 250 pounds
    per day of magnesium fines and chips resulting from the sawing and
    machining operations.
    All reclamable
    fines and chips are remelted.
    However,
    some fines and chips contaminated with cutting oils and other
    organics are considered too hazardous to be handled in melting operations
    and must be disposed of by open burning.
    In granting the six-month
    v~riatiop,we directed petitioner to file with the Agency and the Board
    monthly reports indicating what steps it was pursuing
    to find alterna-
    tive means of disposal to open burning.
    In the present petition for variance, petitioner discusses in
    detail various alternatives that it has pursued including encapsulation,
    hauling, compaction by petitioner, digestion, extrusion and compaction
    by Diversified Industries.
    Encapsulation involves the mixing of magne-
    sium chips with liquids that harden into a solid.
    This system has not
    reached a satisfactory point of development.
    Suitable arrangements for
    hauling have not been accomplished.
    Compaction
    with Diversified In-
    dustries contemplates
    a compacting system with magnesium chips and
    aluminum wire slugs which has not been developed.
    Digestion by petitioner
    using sodium chloride,
    iron chloride, sulfuric acid and tap water has
    not proven satisfactory, both from a cost and space viewpoint.
    Extrusion
    of chips through a die,
    at the present,
    has
    only been partially success-
    ful.
    Noise and possible damage to equipment caused a termination of
    this procedure.
    3
    749

    The remaining alternative employed by Petitioner, whereby
    pellets are made by chip compaction, has proven satisfactory, and
    petitioner is optimistic that within the six-month period requested~
    by this variance proceeding, it will have a satisfactory compaction
    program developed which will allow for the melting of pellets without
    the need for burning of magnesium chips.
    In the meantime,
    it intends
    to pursue the other alternatives considered, but believes that the
    compaction method will be the most likely to achieve results.
    The Agency recommends that the variance be denied believing that peti--
    tioner has not made the degree of progress in this respect that it should
    have by this time.
    However, we note that in cases of this sort and
    comparable cases involving disposal of dxplosive wastes,
    the state of
    the arts
    is still in a highly developmental stage and we do not believe
    any useful purpose
    is served by insisting on immediate compliance with
    open burning regulations where
    the attributes of danger are obvious.
    See
    Environmental Protection Agency v. Olin Corporation, East Alton, Illi-
    nois,
    #70-li; and Olin Corporation v~Environmenta’l Protection Agency,
    #70—25.
    Petitioner appears to have pursued a variety of alternative
    means of disposing of its magnesium chips and is embarking on a specific
    program that gives cause for optimism.
    We do not believe that under
    the circumstances, thevarjance should be denied.
    Clearly, the hardship
    on petitioner in demanding immediate compliance with the regulations is
    disproportionate with any benefit to the public
    in denying the allowance.
    Nothing in this or the former proceeding indicates that any burdens have
    been created upon adjacent properties or residents in the neighborhood.
    This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Board.
    IT IS
    THE
    ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that variance
    previously granted in Case #71—66 be extended to June
    23,
    1972, during
    which time petitioner may burn magnesium waste in the open,
    subject to
    all terms and conditions s~tforth in the original order of variance,
    #71—66.
    I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Boaçd, certify
    that the above Opinion and Ordpr was adopted on
    the
    7~’day
    of
    March,
    1972, by a vote of
    4j—~
    3
    —~
    750

    Back to top