ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March
    7, 1972
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    v.
    )
    PCB71—358
    ALUMINUM COIL ANODIZING CORPORATION
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    v.
    )
    PCB71—365
    CITY OF URBANA, et al.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    v.
    )
    PCB71—368
    GLIDDEN-DURKEE
    Order of the Board
    (by Mr. Currie):
    The motions to dismiss by
    the respondents
    in
    ##71—358 and 71-368, and by Saline Branch Drainage District
    in #71-365,
    are hereby denied.
    We do not believe the complaints
    in the first two cases could be more specific without requiring
    the Agency
    to plead all its evidence, and the respondents
    are
    amply apprised of the charges against them.
    The constitutional
    argurr~ents advanced in #71-368
    are without merit under numerous
    Board precedents.
    The defense raised by the Drainage District
    in #71-365 is
    a factual
    one as to which proo.f may be made at the
    hearing.
    The request for oral argument on
    the motion in #71-358
    is
    denied.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board,
    certify that the Board adopted the above Order this
    7th day
    of March,
    1972, by
    a vote of 4-0.
    3
    —
    745

    Back to top