ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    May
    30,
    1972
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION
    AGENCY
    V.
    )
    P03
    71-86
    STATE
    LINE
    FOUNDRIES,
    INC.
    Dissenting
    Opinion
    by
    Mr.
    Dumelle
    In
    my
    original
    dissent
    filed
    to the
    August
    5,
    1971
    Board
    order
    I
    stated
    that
    the
    penalty
    of
    $7, 500
    was
    much
    too
    severe,
    Here
    was
    a
    struggling
    new
    (:~flpaflywhich
    failed
    to
    get
    a permit
    on
    its
    small
    cupola
    being
    dealt
    a financial
    blow
    almost
    equal
    to
    its
    yearTs
    total
    profits
    of
    $7, 900,
    Yet
    no
    nuisance
    was
    proved.
    I
    said
    then
    and
    I repeat
    that
    a penalty
    in
    the
    range
    of
    $3, 000
    to
    $5, 000
    would have
    been
    fairer,
    Arid
    in
    the
    light
    of recent
    penalties
    assessed
    by
    the
    Board
    even
    those
    suggested
    amounts
    now
    seem
    much
    too
    high.
    In
    the
    EPA
    v.
    Texaco
    case
    (PCB
    72-98)
    an
    oil
    company
    polluted
    the
    drinking
    water
    supply
    of the
    entire
    City
    of
    Olney.
    The
    penalty,
    based
    upon
    what
    I
    would
    term
    a
    wholly inadequate
    stipulation,
    was
    a mere
    $200.
    In
    the
    State
    Line
    case,
    no
    nuisance
    was
    caused
    to the
    neighbors.
    Previous
    cases
    cited
    in
    my earlier
    dissent
    (EPA
    v.
    Southern
    Illinois
    Asphalt,
    P03
    71- 31,
    and
    Roesch Enamel
    v,
    EPA,
    PCB
    71-62)
    also
    had
    not
    obtained
    permits
    but
    caused severe neighborhood nuisances.
    Both received penalties of $5, 000 in
    cases contested before us.
    Both were larger companies with no
    apparent
    financial problems.
    Thus the State Line penalty should certainly have been
    something
    less
    than
    $5,
    000.
    So
    I
    can
    only reiterate
    that
    the
    Board’s
    penalty
    of
    $7, 500.
    was
    much
    too
    severe
    in
    comparison
    to previous
    cases.
    In
    this
    most
    recent
    action
    the
    Board
    had an
    opportunity
    to
    redress
    its
    grievous
    mistake
    and
    regrettably
    chose
    not
    to
    do
    so.
    2
    ~
    ~
    Jacob
    D.
    Dumelle
    Board Member
    I,
    Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the
    Illinois
    Pollution Contro~,J3oard,
    hereby
    certify
    the
    aboc~reDissenting
    Opinion
    was
    submitted
    on
    the&O__~Iayof
    May
    1972.
    Christan L.
    Moffett,
    C1e~4~l
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Contr&’~oard
    4
    633

    Back to top