ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September
    6,
    1972
    CRANE
    PACKING COMPANY
    (MORTON GROVE PLANT)
    V.
    )
    PCB 72—131
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    CRANE PACKING COMPANY
    (CRYSTAL LAKE PLANT)
    v.
    )
    PCB 72—132
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Parker):
    This Order supplements earlier Orders dated April
    4,
    1972 and May 17,
    1972.
    These are related variance proceed-
    ings brought upon petitions filed March 31,
    1972.
    Petitioner
    sought variances for its Morton Grove and Crystal Lake plants
    from certain of the asbestos emission regulations until
    October 31, 1972.
    Public hearings were scheduled
    (by Board Order dated
    April
    4,
    1972) but cancelled after receipt of
    the Agency
    Recommendations and a letter from petitioner’s attorneys
    dated May
    15,
    1972 indicating that the Agency recommendations
    were acceptable to petitioner.
    The Agency recommended
    that
    the variances be granted subject to certain conditions.
    By Order dated May 17, 1972 we granted both variances
    subject to conditions specified in several numbered para-
    graphs of
    the Order.
    One condition
    (par.
    3) was that peti-
    tioner report within
    45 days on the economic feasibility of
    performing
    a stack test on emissions from the fabric dust
    collector after installation.
    We reserved the right, based
    upon this report,
    to order sudh tests to be performed as
    might be necessary.
    Petitioner has now notified the Board
    (by letter dated
    July
    5,
    1972)
    that a stack
    test will cost $700 to $1,200
    and that petitioner
    “does not feel that the expense of
    running stack sampling as
    a
    ‘proof of performance’ may be
    necessary for compliance with the regulations.”
    The Agency
    in its reply
    (letter dated August 11,
    1972)
    concedes that
    5
    359

    emissions sampling is not absolutely necessary for proof
    of compliance with the standards but argues that the $700
    -
    $1,200 cost of the stack
    test is “neither excessive nor
    abnormal”.
    We have no record beyond these two letters
    to look to
    for evidence as
    to the need for and economic feasibility
    of stack testing in this situation.
    We find,
    however,
    that
    petitioner has failed to advance persuasive reasons why the
    $700
    $1,200 expenditure for stack testing would not be
    reasonable under
    the
    circumstances here.
    This Board has
    often emphasized that stack tests give the best indication
    of the actual performance of control equipment
    (e.g.
    see
    In re: Emission Standards,
    PCB *R7l—23, dated April
    13,
    1972,
    page 9).
    We accordingly order that petitioner conduct one or
    more stack tests on emissions from the fabric dust collector
    after
    installation, and report the test results
    to the Agency
    and to this Board.
    The Agency
    is then ordered
    to advise the
    Board whether,
    and
    the extent to which,
    the test results
    affect the continuing grant of these variances.
    I,
    Christan
    L. Moffett, Clerk of
    the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby certify the above Opinion and Order was adopted
    on
    the
    c”
    day of\&~j~~L/~~
    ,
    1972 by
    a vote of
    -~‘
    to
    ~
    .
    .1
    ~
    /fl~~ ~
    Christan LJ~Øett
    5
    360

    Back to top