ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August
    22,
    1972
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    V.
    #72—216
    IOWA-ILLINOIS GAS
    & ELECTRIC CO.
    Supplemental Order & Opinion of the Board
    (by Mr. Currie):
    Having received a stipulation and arguments in this case,
    we concluded that the case was ready for decision and entered a
    final order July 25,
    1972,
    rejecting certain legal defenses
    and imposing a $1000 penalty for the admitted installation
    of equipment without
    a permit.
    Now the Agency informs us that a public hearing scheduled
    for August
    24 had been expected by the parties nevertheless
    to be held and asks us to set aside the order in order to
    permit additional public participation as contemplated when
    the hearing was scheduled.
    It has been our preferred procedure,
    even where a stipulation
    is reached on all factual
    issues, and indeed even when the
    parties agree on a proposed disposition,
    to require that
    the stipulation and proposal be presented publicly so that
    affected citizens have
    a meaningful opportunity to know the
    terms and to express their views.
    See,
    e.g., EPA v. Granite
    City Steel Co.,
    #70—34
    (May
    3,
    1972).
    In the present case
    the
    parties,
    it now appears, had expected to be able to
    make presentations at such a hearinq on the stipulation, and
    our order inadvertently deprived them of that opportunity.
    Fairness to the parties,
    as well as regard for our policy of
    public participation,requires us
    to vacate the order and to
    permit the hearing to be held,
    following which we shall
    consider all materials before us and decide the case accordingly.
    It is
    so ordered.
    In order that in our crowded schedule the risk of this
    kind of misunderstanding may be minimized in the future, we re-
    quest all hearing officers formally to certify to the Board when
    all materials relevant to Board consideration have been
    received.
    We have not asked for such certification in the past,
    but increasing docket pressures make greater formality an unfor-
    tunate necessity,
    as the present case shows.
    I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board, certify
    that the Board adopted the above Supp1ement~lOrder
    & Opinion this
    .~~“~day
    of August,
    1972, by
    a vote of ?~—cD
    .
    (~L~&
    ~
    1
    J~
    5
    231

    Back to top