ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 22, 1972
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY)
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 72—207
    COUNTY OF DU PAGE,
    a body
    politic and corporate,
    Respondent.
    INTERIM OPINION
    AND
    ORDER ON MOTIONS
    (by Mr. Parker):
    Respondent, the County of DuPage, has filed
    a motion to
    strike paragraph 2(C)
    of Complainant’s prayer for relief as
    being substantially insufficient at law.
    Respondent contends
    that the County is not one of the governmental units encompassed
    by the language of Section
    46 of the Environmental Protection
    Act.
    We believe a decision on this motion should be deferred
    until the Board’s final determination of all issues presented
    in this proceeding.
    This will afford all parties to the
    proceeding an opportunity to file briefs on the questions
    raised by the motion.
    Respondent has also filed a motion to add as parties
    the Villages of Addison and Itasca on the basis that their
    sewage treatment responsibilities will be affected by any
    order entered by us in this proceeding.
    From a review of the
    pleadings filed in support of this motion it appears
    to us
    that there may well be Villages in addition to Addison and Itasca
    that may be similarly affected by the interim wastewater plan
    of the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission for its
    Region
    I.
    For example, the additional communities of Wood Dale,
    Elk Grove Village and Bensenville are also included as part of
    Region
    I of the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission.
    No
    information has been presented to show why these additional
    communities should not be parties to this proceeding if the
    villages of Itasca and Addison are to be added.
    Also,
    no
    information has been presented to show the relationship be-
    tween the subject matter of this proceeding and the DuPage
    County regionalization hearings and final reports concerning
    Region
    I which are presently scheduled for completion by the end
    of September.
    We feel that Respondent should submit this
    additional information and that copies of Respondent’s motion
    and supporting papers should be forwarded to all five of the
    communities within Region I along with
    a request that they
    submit briefs or other information to us on the questions presented.
    ORDER
    1. Respondent’s motion to strike is held in abeyance
    until this Board’s final determination of all issues
    presented in this proceeding.
    If the questions raised
    5
    223

    by this motion have not been mooted or otherwise dis-
    posed of by the time of such final determination, all
    parties to this proceeding are requested to file briefs
    on the questions raised by this motion.
    2.
    The motion to add parties is held in abeyance until
    such time as Respondent submits additional information
    in accordance with the Opinion expressed above.
    Respondent shall
    serve copies of this Order and of the
    Motion to add parties and supporting papers on the
    communities of Itasca, Addison, Wood Dale,
    Elk Grove
    Village and Bensenville,
    as well as on the Hearing
    Officer currently conducting the Region I proceedings,
    and shall forward copies of the proofs of service to
    the Board.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board, certify
    that the Boarç4 adopted the above Interim Opinion and Order
    this
    eRe~
    ‘~
    day of August, 1972,
    by a vote of
    C
    Christan L. Moffet
    ,
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollution
    ontrol Board
    5
    224

    Back to top