ILLINOIS POLLUTION
    CONTROL BOARD
    August 15,
    1972
    )
    CITY OF
    EVANSTON
    )
    )
    v.
    )
    P~B72-108
    )
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    )
    VILLAGE OF
    KENILWORTH
    )
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 72-82
    )
    ENVmONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY
    )
    )
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr.
    Dumelle)
    These
    two petitions
    embrace
    a common topic and request
    variances
    from
    the flhinois
    Sanitary
    Water Board Water
    Quality
    Standards
    SWB-7
    and more
    recently under
    the Water
    Pollution
    Control Regulations
    effective April
    18,
    1972.
    Under those
    regulations
    the petitioners
    were
    required to discontinue their
    dis-
    charges
    of water plant
    wastes
    Into
    Lake
    Michigan by
    July,
    1972.
    CITY OF
    EVANSTON
    The Evanston water treatment
    plant
    is located on the shore of Lake
    Michigan
    near the northeast
    corner of the City and processes
    lake water for the
    consumption
    of approximately
    150, 000 residents
    in Evanston
    and Skokie,
    minois.
    Total water
    treated
    by the plant
    is
    approximately
    9.4 billion
    gallons per year with an
    average
    of about
    25
    million gallons per
    day being processed.
    As a part of normal plant
    operation the rapid
    sand filters
    must periodically
    be back-washed
    to remove accumulated
    solids
    from the filter
    surfaces
    and this
    waste water historically
    has been discharged
    to the Lake.
    It is
    also necessary
    to wash accumulated
    sludge
    from the four water plant
    settling basins
    In the
    spring
    and fall of each year
    and this
    material
    has also
    been discharged to the Lake.
    The City proposes that
    it plug the
    existing outfall
    pipes
    and divert the flow
    of filter back-wash
    water
    to a new concrete balancing tank.
    This
    water will then
    be pumped at a uniform rate back into the plant
    for re-processing
    along with
    ‘45

    ~ning
    raw water,
    Sludge
    washed from the settling
    basins will
    be pumped
    tt~
    ~i
    a
    new
    connection to
    the Evanston
    sewer
    system
    and will
    then
    be
    processed
    b~the
    lVletropolitan
    Sanitary
    District
    of Greater
    Chicago
    (MSDGC)
    treatment
    facilities.
    The
    expected
    completion
    date for
    the
    new facilities
    is
    December
    31,
    1972,
    VILLAGE
    OF KENILWORTH
    The Keniiworth
    water plant
    also
    discharges
    its
    filter
    wash water
    and
    settling
    basin
    sludge
    into
    Lake
    Michigan,
    The Village
    proposes
    to
    divert
    those
    wastes
    to
    the
    Metropolitan
    Sanitary District
    system by
    December
    31,
    1972,
    The
    filter
    wash water
    amounts
    to
    about
    5, 000, 000
    gallons per
    year
    and the semi-
    annual
    cleaning of
    the
    sedimentation
    basin
    causes
    around 400,
    000
    gallons of
    waste
    water per
    year.
    The total
    quantity of solids,
    on
    a
    dry basis,
    is
    about
    20,
    000
    pounds
    per year,
    The
    concentration
    of
    solids
    in
    the wash water
    is
    low
    and
    it
    is anticipated
    that
    this water
    can be
    recirculated
    to
    the
    sedimenta-
    tion basins,
    leaving
    only
    the
    wastewater
    associated with
    basin
    cleaning
    of which
    to
    be
    disposed.
    DISCUSSION
    The
    Agency has
    recommended that
    both requests
    for variance
    be granted.
    The Agency notes that
    both projects
    could
    have been
    completed
    earlier
    but indicates
    that
    to
    deny relief
    at this
    point
    would
    not be
    a
    satisfactory
    solution to either pro-
    blem
    since
    the delay in compliance
    was
    not intentional
    but
    rather
    was
    caused by
    the
    petitioners~good faith belief
    that further
    progress
    could
    not
    be accomplished
    without
    a
    reaction
    and
    response from
    MSDGC on the proposals~
    We
    agree with the
    Agency
    recommendation
    and will
    grant
    the
    variances
    to
    December
    31,
    1972,
    According
    to
    the
    reported effluent
    levels,
    these
    two
    projects
    will
    eliminate
    a total
    of around
    181
    million
    gallons
    of wastewater
    and
    923 tons
    of
    solids
    from
    the
    Lake
    annually.
    We
    encourage this
    progress,
    This opinion
    con~titutesthe
    Board~sfindings
    of fact
    and
    conclusions
    of law,
    ORDER
    The variances
    are hereby
    granted until
    December
    31,
    1972,
    upon the
    following
    conditions:
    1,
    The
    City of Evanston
    shall
    post
    an
    individual
    performance
    bond

    —3—
    in
    the
    amount
    of
    $10, 000.
    2,
    The
    Village
    of
    Kenilworth
    shall
    post
    an
    individual
    performance
    bond
    in
    the
    amount
    of
    $3, 000.
    3,
    Both
    petitioners
    shall
    submit
    monthly
    progress
    reports
    to
    the
    Agency
    setting
    forth
    the
    stages
    of
    completion
    of their
    respective
    projects.
    I,
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett,
    Clerk
    of
    the
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board,
    hereby
    certify
    the
    above
    Opinion
    and Order
    was
    adopted
    on
    the
    /~
    ~1ay
    of
    August,
    1972
    by
    a vote
    of
    ~
    _____
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett,
    rk
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    5
    147

    Back to top