ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April 25, 1972
    ROBERT B. NILLES, INC.
    #72—97
    v.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (BY
    JACOB D. DUNELLE)
    Petitioner has re—submitted a request for variance which was
    originally filed on March 16 and ruled on (dismissed without preju-
    dice) on March 28, 1972. Petitioner seeks to be allowed to make
    sewer connections to eight lots
    in
    Nilles’ Sheridan Road Subdivision
    and
    to be allowed to use the existing sewer services at 245 Prospect
    Avenue in Lake Bluff, despite the connection ban imposed on the North
    Shore Sanitary District as part of our order in League of Women Voters,
    et al v. NSSD, PCB7O—7, 11, 12, 14 (March 31, 1971) The essential
    difference between the re-submission and the original petition is the
    addition of the representation that the asked for connections drain
    to the Lake Bluff Sewage Treatment Plant. Our earlier opinion and
    order concerning the instant properties was predicated on the sewer
    discharges flowing ultimately to the Clavey Road plant.
    We have held in the past that where construction had not cosmienced
    as of the time of the imposition of the sewer connection ban, we will
    deny the request; see Piroyan
    V.
    Environmental Protection Agency, ?CB71-
    103 (August 30, 1971)
    .
    Where the hardship is self—imposed as in the
    instant case, we will not grant a variance as we have in cases where a
    house had been built or where substantial steps toward completion of
    construction had been taken, see Wachta and Mota v. Environmental Pro—
    ~~ionAen2~
    PCB71—77 (July 12, 1971.)
    Petitioner has made conclusory allegations that denial of a variance
    would result in an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship. We are not bound
    to accept such conclusions as we do accept facts well pleaded in a
    verified petition, see City of Jacksonville v. Environmental Protection
    PCB7O-30 (January 27, 1971)
    .
    In the instant case~ if we accepted
    as true all the factual allegations of the petition, we could not find
    proof that compliance with the order imposing the sewer connection ban
    would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship, The petition is
    therefore dismissed on the ground that no variance could be granted even
    if all the allegations were proved.
    I,
    Christan Moffett, Clerk
    of the Pollution Control Board,
    certify
    that the Board adopted the above Opinion and Order of the Board this
    25th Day of April, 1972, by a vote of
    3 to 2~
    ~ 1
    ~
    ~
    f~/~
    /
    /1
    —~——~—.——————.----—
    -.
    /
    /
    /
    /1
    /~
    /
    4—429

    Back to top