ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 1, 1972
    BRUNO E FEIGE
    #72—192
    V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (BY SAMUEL T. LAWTON, JR.)
    Petition for variance from the sewer connection ban order
    entered in case entitled League of Women Voters v. North Shore
    Sanitary District, #70-7, was requested by petitioner in order to
    enable construction of a single-family residence, the sewer effluent
    from which would be tributary to the North Shore Sanitary District.
    The original petition states that in March, 1971, petitioner obli-
    gated himself to purchase two lots in the City of Waukegan at a
    price of $14,000.00 and 6 interest to be paid on the unpaid balance.
    The down payment was $2,000.00 and $720.00 has been paid in interest
    prior to the filing of the petition. Petitioner a1lege~j that the
    taxes on
    his existing home were such that
    he was forced to sell
    and that he does have a bona-fide buyer. Petitioner alleges financial
    hardship and stresses that the land purchase was consummated prior
    to the original sewer ban order which was entered on March 31, 1971.
    On May 10, 1972, we entered an order stating that the petition
    for variance does not contain adequate information upon which the
    Board could make its decision and requested that either petitioner
    or the Agency should advise the Board which of the District’s plants
    would receive the effluent from the proposed construction, that the
    Agency advise the Board if the sewer line which would receive the
    effluent is over-loaded and that the Agency should file its recommen-
    dation with the Board.
    On May 28, 1972, we received a short communication from the
    petitioner stating that to the best of his knowledge, the effluent
    would enter the Waukegan plant by way of the Sunset sewer line. The
    recommendation received from the Agency states that the petitioner’s
    proposed connection would be tributary to the Waukegan sewage treat-
    ment plant via the Judge Avenue sewer and that petitioner is unable
    to
    obtain one of the
    connection permits previously authorized to the
    North Shore Sanitary District by our partial lifting of the sewer
    ban order (entered January 31, 1972, modified March 2, l972,~because
    the Judge Avenue sewer is classified inadequate to transport addi-
    tional waste water. These and other sewers have been previously
    5— 81

    ln~
    1_~_
    1W
    J
    t ~
    a
    c
    r~a ci
    ~
    ‘_)~
    ~J1.
    C-
    a-
    I-a-
    i-
    0
    5
    ~ec~i
    3:
    £rzr
    ~
    ~y
    Ii
    a
    ra~
    0
    a rio
    sua
    a
    a
    n
    a-in- e
    U
    ci
    ii~al
    peLit~on
    a-~ ruion
    it
    S
    ~ e ot a-~ vur nc
    thi a
    th a o~ i-o
    r
    ew pth’taoncr
    ~ i h a~ ~ircz I
    an~ ~h ~e a
    ii
    trar
    ror can we corria. cat e o sa~ a Ju r~-~a- t w gr
    ti-an deny tha- requet
    t
    e~s~s~ ~er
    ~ ousa i-as b e
    comoletely built but re
    tie
    dat
    a
    L
    eider (March 3
    a
    or there sub~tantli~ sec s ~owaa-
    ~omF eta-
    have ceer
    ken
    we can clearly
    ~ue e t a- nardsi
    a n )r-~COnfl ction to e~
    unreasonaule
    I fact w’
    i
    avc ci nc u ~ the recently
    j cide
    case of WaeBta ~nd Mote
    d/b a Be
    i
    ~e Subd vision v
    EPA, #7l-7~.
    feere t~e petitioner
    ~uo a-yen units comnlet~1
    built,
    and the Board gtanted a v rthnce to permit the sewe
    connections.
    For the remaining lots in the subdivision
    the
    Board ordered the bulidurs
    t present a program to the Board
    demonstrating
    thu fursibility
    o alLernatives~”
    See also Wacnon v. EPA, #71—85, (LIt(’d Jufy 26, i97l~
    We urge
    e ci y of Waukeqan to take all necessary steps i-o
    abate the overloaded condition of all Jewers within its jurisdictions
    This opinion constitutes
    Lii
    findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board.
    IT
    IS
    TIlE ORDER of Lire Pollution
    Control Board that the petition
    for variance be denied.
    I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of
    the Pollution Control Board, certify
    that the above Opinion and Order was adopted on the 1st Day of
    August, A. D, 1972, by a voLe of
    _____
    to 0
    —2—
    5
    82

    Back to top