1. said sites.
      2. Since notice of this suit Respondents have ceased dumping atboth sites.

ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
July
25,
1972
ENViRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
)
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
PCB
NO.
72-3
)
LOBUE,
INC.
,
an
Illinois
corporation,
)
LOBEJE
EXCAVATING
CO.,
an
Illinois
aorporat
Ion,
FRED
LOBUE,
DOROTHY
LOBUE
)
FOUSHI,
ANTHONY
LOBUE,
CHARLES
LOBUE,
SAMUEL
LOBIJE,
and
the
FIRST
NATIONAL
BANK
OF
CHICAGO
HEIGHTS,
a
bank
chartered
)
by
the
State
of
Illinois,
as
Trustee,
)
)
Respondents,
he
vyn
A,
Rieff.
Assistant
Attorney
General
for
the
EPA
h tenard
Petrarca
,
br
the
Responuents
OPINION
AND
ORDER
OF
THE
BOARD
(by
Mr.
Henss)
Respondents
are
the
owners
and
operators
of
two
refuse
disposal
sites
in
or
near
Chicago
Heights,
Illinois.
The
complaint
filed
by
the
Environmental
Protection
~gency
on
January
6,
1972
alleges
numer-
ous
violat
ions
of
the
Environmental
Protect
ion
Act
and
the
Rules
and
hegulat~oi~~fc
Refuse
Disposal
Sites
and
Facilities
at
the
two
sites,
W:i.th
regard
to
Site
#1,
the
Agency
claims
that
Respondents
since
April,
1969,
have
operated
the
site:
(1)
without
a
State
permit
or
:~eg~stratton,
(2)
without
applying
adequate
and
sufficient
cover,
and
(3)
without
proper
loea:1
zoning.
It
is
further
claimed
that
Respon-
dents
have
ignored
topographical
planning
to
the
extent
that
the
grade
of
the
site
has
increased
by
approximately
30
feet
and
is
now
above
the
grade
of
abutting
residential
properties.
With
respect
to
Site
#2,it
is
alleged
that
Respondents
have
opera-
ted:
(1)
without
a
State
permit
or
registration,
(2)
without
applying
adequate
and
sufficient
cover
or
spreading
and
compacting
the
garbage
and
refuse,
(3)
without
having
ac~uate
equipment,
fencing
and
facili—
~ bes
on
the
site,
and
(4)
without
coat
ining
the
dumping
of
refuse
to
the
smallest
practical
area.
It
is
also
alleged
that
oils
and
hazardous
materials
were
deposited
on
Site
~2
without
written
approval
ci
the
Illinois
i)epartment
o:f
Public
Health
or
the
Environmental
Protect
ion
Agency,
5
-
33

—2—
The hearing,
scheduled
for
February
28,
1972,
was
continued
because
of
transcript
financing
problems
and
to
permit
settlement
discussion.
A
stipulation
of
facts
and
proposed
order
were
filed
by the parties on July 5,
1972.
The
facts
as
stipulated
are
that
Respondents
own
and
operate
the
refuse
disposal
site
and
have
in
the
course
of
their
contracting,
construction
and
demolition
business
utilized
both
sites
to
dispose
of
foundry
sand
and
demolition
materials
Site
#1
has
been
used
in
such
a
manner
on
an
irregular
basis
since
April,
1969
and
Site
#2
has
been
so
used
since
December,
1970.
The demolition materials consist of wood, bricks, wires, glass
and other materials resulting from the performance of contracts
with
municipalities
and
private
contractors
to
demolish
old
and
sometimes dangerous and hazardous dwellings.
Respondents have not taken
any
precautions
to
prevent
the
dis-
posal
of
junk
cars,
appliances,
garbage
and
other
debris
on
each
site
and
such
other
material
has
been
deposited
on
each
of
said
sites.
After
the
materials
were
deposited,
either
by
Respondents
or
others,
Respondents
spread,
compacted
and
covered
on
an
irregular
basis
leaving
the
refuse
exposed
and
uncovered
for
many
months
at
a
time
on
several
occasions.
Respondents
have
not
at
any
time,
either
before
or
after
the
filing
of
the
Complaint,
registered
with
the
State
or
obtained
any
State
permit
for
the
operation
of
either
site.
However,
Respondents
have
contracted
for
the
necessary
soil
borings
on
Site
#2
and will
apply
for
a
State
permit
for
said
site.
The
deposition
of
foundry
sand
and
demolition
materials
on
Site
#1
has
increased
the
grade
of
said
site
approximately
fifteen
to
thirty
feet
to
a
level
above
the
grade
of
the
residential
property
adjoining
the
site
on
the
north
and
west.
However,
Respondents
have,
as
part
of
the
settlement
here
being
proposed
agreed,
and
have
begun,
to remove fill to the southeast and east of said residences so as to
eltainS any
drainage
problem which may
have
been
caused
said
resi-
dents
by the fill.
Since notice of this suit Respondents have ceased dumping at
both sites.
Equipment has been employed at both sites to clean and cover
and the junk
cars
on the site have been removed.
Gates and some
fencing have been installed at both sites.
Further work as specified
in
the
Order
is
to
be
done
at
Site
#1.
The
settlement
proposed
by
the
parties
would
require
Respondents
to
cease
and
desist
from
depositing
refuse
on
Site
#1,
cease
and
desist
from
depositing
refuse
on
Site
#2
without
a
permit,
remove
and
relocate
the
offending
fill
and
slag
heap,
construct
a
fence
and
take
other
steps
to
prevent
the
accumulation
of
junk
cars,
and
pay
a
penalty of $1,000.00.
5—34

We
are
asked only to
judge
the
reasonableness
of
the
proposed
settlement.
The
penalty
is
in
line
with
penalties
the
Board
has
previously
imposed
for
this
type
of
violation.
We
note
that
Respondents
ceased
operation at both sites after the filing of the Complaint and have
made progress toward compliance with the law.
There will be some
expense in the removal of a substantial quantity of fill from Site #1.
The Board finds the settlement to be reasonable and it is approved.
It is hereby ordered:
(1)
Respondents are hereby ordered to cease and desist from
depositing refuse on Site #1.
(2)
Respondents are hereby ordered to cease and desist from
depositing refuse on Site #2 until such time as a permit
for
said
site
is
issued
by
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
(3)
Respondents
are
hereby
ordered
to
remove fill
from
Site
#1
to
the
east
and
southeast
of
the
residential
properties
adjoining
said
site
as
agreed
upon
by
the
parties.
(4)
Respondents
are
hereby
ordered
to
remove
the
large
heap
of foundry slag and sand presently located on Site #1 in the south-
west
corner
so
as
to
level
the
grade
with
the
surrounding
area.
(5)
Respondents
are
hereby
ordered
to
construct
a
fence
fully
along
the
north property line of Site #l(i.e. 26th Street) so as to
prevent
the
deposition
of
junk
cars
on
said
site.
And,
in
the
event
any
cars
are
introduced
upon
Respondents’
property,
Respondents
shall
remove
same
no
later
than
seven
days
after
notice
from
the
agency.
(6)
Respondents
are
hereby
ordered
to
pay
to
the
State
of
Illinois a
penalty
in the amount of 81,000.00.
Payment shall be by
check payable to the Fiscal Services Division, Environmental Protection
Agency, 2200 churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion
anjl
Order was adopted this
QS’
dayof July, l972byavoteof
q
to
C.
Li
,•
5—35

Back to top