ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January16,
    1973
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    #72—155
    v.
    ILLINOIS CENTRAL
    RAILROAD
    COMPANY,
    a Corporation
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (BY SAMUEL T.
    LAWTON,
    JR.):
    Motion to dismiss the above-captioned complaint has been filed
    by the railroad on the basis of res judicata.
    Injunction had been
    entered against the railroad in the Circuit Court of Champaign County
    enjoining the railroad from liknowingly,
    intentionally and wLLfully
    burning railroad tiesu,
    The burning incident, which
    is the subject
    of
    the present complaint, was asserted in the Champaign Circuit Court
    as constituting a violation of said injunction based on a complaint
    and petition for rule to show cause.
    On March 30,
    1972,
    an Order was entered on this petition in favor
    of the railroad and the rule to show cause discharged.
    The contention
    of the railroad is that the foregoing favorable order constitutes
    res judicata so far as the present proceeding
    is concerned.
    The posi-
    tion of the Agency
    is
    that the violation of the injunction recuired
    a finding of wilful action whe~easthe complaint in the instant case
    requires
    only
    a
    demonstration
    that
    the
    open
    burning
    was
    threatened
    or
    allowed by
    respondent
    which,
    of
    course,
    is
    sufficient
    to
    constitute
    violation of the Environmental Protection Act, Section 9(a).
    In addition, we note that the railroad,
    in an independent action,
    entitledlllinois Central Railroad v. Environmental Protection Agency,
    #72C563,
    filed in the Circuit Court of Champaign County, had sought
    to enjoin the Agency from prosecuting the instant complaint before
    this Board premised on the concept of res judicata based on the March
    30,
    1972 order discharging the rule to show cause.
    Order was entered by
    the Circuit Court of Champaign County in the railroad~sinjunction
    proceeding dismissing the complaint with prejudice and finding the
    issues in favor of the Environmental Protection Agency.
    Accordingly,
    we
    will
    dismiss the rai1road~smotion to strike and dismiss this
    proceeding based on the absence of res judicata as found by the Circuit
    Court of Champaign County.
    6
    -~
    501

    ~e
    have
    further
    heli
    that
    failure
    to
    hold
    hearing
    within
    stxtv
    days
    from
    the
    f~1inq
    of
    the
    coniclaint
    is not
    a jurisdictional
    defect
    and
    does
    not
    constitute
    a
    basis
    for dismissal.
    All other
    ccntenttons
    raised
    in
    the
    motion
    are
    ec~ua1ly
    lacking in merit.
    The
    mction
    to
    stri:~e~nd disn~ss
    te
    denied.
    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan
    Moffett,
    Clerk
    of
    the
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    certify
    that
    the
    above
    Order
    was
    adopted
    on
    the
    16th
    Day
    of
    January,
    1973,
    by
    a
    vote
    of
    _____
    to
    _________
    —2--
    6
    502

    Back to top