ILL

\uH

TION

~H~rLOL

LO:\IP)

2$,

5PI’\

l~d I\H~ Il\\Lii

:\1i\(’~,

I\L.

P(H

72 --427

l:h\

IlO\

LL\

‘r\.

‘(Yi$(4’8)~

\(~JiT~(Th

H

I

N’

N

Ni)

)Ii

)L~I(h”

HI 1~L( )\lfl)

\b.

i)omel

0

~OcI0~

in

PHL

72-430

~

3i~osH~lro-;,

ceeds,

(t(.

located

s

nt

to

tlIc.

THO

isnnI

peTTton

is

Hr

tIie

sonic

S so

S

00

No

mht’

27.

S

5,

~‘~‘

C

S

03

1531

C’

51

‘0531150

PC

C

()SfS

of

a

~ro

S~s sir’:s

c

1h~’

jil’;

to

tee

p01)110

de1~neoted nor.’

hod

tin’

lOSS

ft

:sin3~

oslo

lob

desti’uetor

been

explored,

The

OPI1IOSC

SOlOS

13°

01151

01

1101311110

1110

del)ris

would

l:e

81,

388

150

to

8132,20

per

re

wh~o3 :

St

cost

thot

does

not

appear

e\t5-SSjV(’

10

335.

Tb e petitioner

f3i

other

stotes

Ihot

3urning

will

not greatty

~OilL1t0 the

lImosIlhere

bitt

this

i~ ~

ConcluSion

ond

no

estimates

ore

given

for

pol1iitan~

eniisssons,

No

inOtrrna~100

15

3iVC?n

~5

to

topogrophy

or

the

distance

to

nearby

reside

n

es,

He

petittoner

s

material

is

still

inadecuate,

We

would

potnt

out

crid

discourage

a

refi1in~ since

the

rosts

per

acre

do

appear

to

be

not

excessive

and

hardship

has

not:

been

adeclaateivdfle0ed,

The

variance

petition

is

disinisse(

as

inadenuate.

r

IS

SO

ORDE1~ED.

I,

Christan

ft

MoffetI,

(1 °ri

of

the

Illinois

Pollution

Control

Potion,

bereft

could iv

the

shove

Opinion

and

O:rder

woo

e

adopted

on

the ~

8~~doy

of

hove

mU or,

1

72

1

)V

vote

of

-~___________________________

Christstn

I..

tiolbett,

(t~2

Ilibmis

I3Iltl

ion

(Nmttnl

lHsts:

6

—