ILLINOIS

i(OLLi

TT(

I

~

((

~U(

)L

)~\ii

1)

Ocluor

2h

I 072

ENVIRONi\IENT~\LI~ROTECTION:\CENC

~j

PCB

72 —108

HIGH

L:\KL

101

LTII

~,

~

OLIN

JON

:\T~1)

()I1I)TL1

01’

ThI:

liOhill)

by

I\r.

I)umeile)

IS

10

tOlole

115

CII

0

\1oI~on

10

RCC0flSidCi~dtOfl.

The

case

(0Iy:IJ.~

Oil

n;cryenlenl

001011

\viIiI’eifl

oo

found

that

lUgh

Lake

0

r

~i~1:s1w:

mr

onO

was

ope rali np

II

s

masi e water

treatment

fa

oil

iti

Cs

0:11

0

1

Cr1

Om

IflIfl~

a

valid

penn

:r~

)m

the

~\gency,

in

viol

atton

of

Scet 0

ci

120)

o:

ihe

:\ei,

and

further

that

they

F~ad

operated

those

acilities

1

O11

1

ur

flC

a

operator

c eriifi?

b~ Che

\~cno~

in

~iol

i~lOfl

of

111:1

1

02

in

the

Sanitary

Water

Board

Ru) es

and

H egul

aliens

vumber

2.

S~i~

hcrd

Opinion

dOed

October

3,

1072)

In

that

Opinion

we

assessed

o

neri oily

of

52

500

for

the

violations.

I

pen

reconsideration

of the

matter

we

again

find

that

a penalty

of

$2500

anprepriate

under

the

circumstances

of

this

case.

in fact,

had

ii

not

been

It

be

miti eating

evidence

set

forth

;in the

original

case

the

penalt

would

have

fuon

even

greater.

The

\lotion

is

therefore

denied.

IT

IS

SO

ORDEIEI).

I,

Christan

IL.

Moffett,

Clerk

of

the

Illinois

Pollution

Control

Board,

hereby

ertifb’

the

above

Opinion

and

Order

was

adopted

on

the

~~~day

of

October,

P72

by

a

vote

of

___________________________

Christan

L.

Moffett,

Cle

Illinois

Pollution

Contro

Board

6

—