ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    July 26, 1973
    BURLINGTON NORTHERN,
    INC.
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 73—175
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    Barry N.
    Gutterinan on behalf of Petitioner;
    Steven C. Bonaguidi, Assistant Attorney General, on behalf of
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Seaman)
    Petition for variance from Rule 3—3.112 of the Rules and
    Regulations Governing the Control of Air Pollution was received
    by this Board on April
    30,
    1973.
    Petitioner, Burlington
    Northern,
    Inc., owns and operates a railroad locomotive and
    passenger car service and storage facility in Chicago, County of
    Cook,
    Illinois.
    Petitioner requests a variance to permit the operation of
    three coal-fired steam boilers emitting particulate matter beyond
    the limits prescribed by the Air Pollution Control Regulations
    until and during the retirement of these boilers through the
    procurement of steam from the Chicago Union Station.
    Petitioner
    uses the boilers~output for the following operations: operation
    of three air compressers which supply air to check brakes and
    for maintenance procedures; operation of two steam jacketed
    kettles used to clean parts; heating of nine buildings; heating
    of 75
    Amtrak
    and 92 suburban cars;
    provision of hot water for
    dining car facilities; and provision of showers for employees.
    An average of approximately 40 tons of soft coal are burned
    per day.
    This coal has the following average analysis:
    0.81
    Sulfur, 11.72
    Ash, 31.32
    Volatile matter,
    4.92
    Moisture and
    12,182 BTU/Pound.
    Petitioner estimates that when burning the
    above-described coal particulate emissions of about 6.45 pounds
    per million BTU are discharged.
    In addition, Petitioner calcu-
    lates that the following contaminants are discharged:
    Carbon
    monoxide
    -
    31b/hour, hydrocarbons as CH4
    -
    1.6 lb/hour, nitrogen
    oxides as N02
    -
    24 lb/hour and S02
    -
    48 lb/hour,
    8—617

    —2—
    During the summer months, only one of the three boilers will
    be running, one will be on standby and the third will be down for
    maintenance.
    Petitioner’s facilities are located in a highly
    industrial
    area,
    and,
    as of the date of the investigation,
    no
    complaints had been received by the Agency regarding the opera-
    tion of the coal-fired boilers.
    There is no pollution control equipment on the stack of
    Petitioner’s power plant.
    The proposed means of controlling emis-
    sions is to shut down this plant when arrangements to procure
    steam from another sou~rcehave been completed.
    Petitioner’s Compliance Schedule, which has received Agency
    approval, provides for complete abandonment of the existing
    coal-fired boilers and steam driven air compressors with steam
    requirements to be purchased from the Chicago Union Station
    Company and compressed air to be furnished by a new electric
    driven compressor.
    One combination natural gas
    /
    light oil
    fired boiler will be installed in the Chicago Union Station
    Company Power Plant Building.
    Petitioner has received assurance
    from Peoples Gas, Light and Coke Company that sufficient gas will
    be provided to meet requirements.
    Complete compliance can be
    expected by November 1,
    1973.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board.
    IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that variance
    be granted to enable Petitioner
    to operate its steam boilers
    until November
    1,
    1973 subject to the following conditions:
    1.
    Petitioner shall notify the Agency of the completion
    of its plans
    and specifications.
    2.
    Petitioner shall notify the Agency of the completion
    of its variance program on or before November 1,
    1973.
    I, Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted by
    the Board on the
    ;~4~day
    of
    _____________,
    1973, by
    a vote of
    to
    ?~
    L
    8
    618

    Back to top