ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 3,
    1973
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    #72—502
    v
    CITY OF PRINCETON
    PRESCOTT BLOOM, SPECIAL ASST. ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON
    BEHALF OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    GEORGE S.
    SKINNER, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (BY SAMUEL
    T.
    LAWTON,
    JR.):
    Complaint was filed against the City of Princeton alleging
    that since July 1,
    1970,
    in the operation of
    its refuse disposal
    site and facility, Respondent violated Section 21(e)
    of the
    Environmental Protection Act requiring the obtaining of a permit;
    caused or allowed open dumping of refuse in violation of Section
    21(b)
    of the Act on seven specified dates in 1971 and 1972;
    violated Section 9(c)
    of the Act and Rule 5.02(a)
    and
    (b)
    of Part V,
    Chapter
    2, Air Pollution Regulations,
    on September 28,
    1971 and
    September 29,
    1971; caused or allowed open dumping of refuse in viola-
    tion of Rule 3.04 of the Rules and Regulations for Refuse Disposal
    Sites and Facilities on seven specified dates in 1971 and 1972; vio-
    lated Rule
    5.03 of said Rules with respect to confining the dumping
    of refuse to the smallest practical area on the same dates; failed
    to provide fencing in violation of Rule 5.04 on four specified dates
    in 1971 and 1972;
    failed to spread and compact in violation of Rule
    5.06 on seven specified dates in 1971 and 1972;
    failed to provide
    daily cover in violation of Rule
    5.07 on the same dates; and deposited
    liquids and hazardous materials without Agency approval in violation
    of Rule 5.08 on the same dates.
    The entry of a cease and desist order, the requirement for a
    permit from the Agency or the closing of the facility and penalties
    in the maximum statutory amount are sought.
    Hearing was held on March
    5,
    1973,
    at which time a stipulation
    of fact was submitted pursuant to which the City acknowledges that
    it operated the facility without an Environmental Protection Agency
    permit until March
    5,
    1973,
    at which time
    a permit to modify and
    operate the site was issued by the Environmental Protection Agency.
    The stipulation states that open dumping of refuse has been discon-
    7
    677

    tinued, that open burning of trees has been discontinued,
    that dumping
    is presently confined to the smallest practical area,
    that portable
    fencing has been installed and that daily cover has been applied
    since May
    25,
    1972.
    A full-time operator is at the site to properly
    spread and compact refuse as admitted.
    Disposition of liquid and
    hazardous materials were disposed of pursuant to permit issued by the
    Environmental Protection Agency on August
    2,
    1971, and lagoons required
    by the permit appear to have been established.
    Efforts are being
    made to minimize blowing paper and to emplace dirt cover over the entire
    dumping area.
    Proper final cover has not been applied to all portions
    of the site, but cover will be available and applied during the spring
    months.
    Concrete
    paving
    bricks
    and
    construction
    debris
    presently
    on
    the
    site
    are
    being
    moved
    and will be completely covered.
    Implicit in
    the
    stipulation
    is
    that
    violations
    of
    all
    of
    the
    allegations
    of
    the
    complaint
    except
    those
    relating
    to
    disposition
    of
    hazardous
    materials
    without a permit are conceded.
    It also
    is evident that the City
    is
    taking affirmative steps to bring its operation into compliance, for which
    we commend it.
    We
    will
    direct
    the
    City
    to
    cease
    and
    desist
    all
    future
    violations
    of
    the
    relevant
    Regulations and statutory provisions and impose a
    penalty
    in
    the
    amount
    of
    $500
    for
    the
    violations
    aforesaid.
    This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Board.
    IT
    IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board:
    1.
    City of Princeton shall, within 30 days from the date
    of this Order, apply for and obtain a permit from the
    Environmental Protection Agency for operation of its
    landfill site and shall cease and desist all violations
    of the relevant Regulations and statutory provisions
    with respect to the operation of refuse disposal sites and
    facilities.
    2.
    Penalty in the amount of $500 is assessed for violations
    of Sections 9(c) and
    21(b) and
    (e)
    of the Environmental
    Protection Act and Rules
    3.04,
    5.03,
    5.04,
    5.06 and 5.07
    of
    bhe Rules and Regulations relative to Refuse Disposal
    Sites and Facilities and Rules
    5.02(a)
    and
    (b)
    of Chapter
    2,
    Air Pollution,
    of the Rules and
    Regulations
    of
    the Illinois
    Pollution
    Control Board.
    Penalty payment by certified check
    or money order payable to the State of Illinois shall be
    made to:
    Fiscal Services Division,
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency,
    2200 Churchill Drive, Springfield, Illi-
    nois 62706.
    I, Christan Moffett,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
    certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted on the
    ~
    day of May,
    1973, by
    a vote of
    4./
    to
    p
    —.
    -2-
    7
    678

    Back to top