ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April
    12,
    1973
    CITY OF HARRISBURG AND
    MILO LAMBERT
    v.
    )
    PCB72—513
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Samuel
    T.
    Lawton,
    Jr.):
    Petitioners, Milo Lambert
    (“Lambert”) and City of
    Harrisburg (~theCity”)
    are seeking a variance from the
    Board’s order of November 21, 1972
    (Environmental Protection
    Agency
    v.
    City of Harrisburg and Milo Lambert, #72-80,
    5 PCB
    )
    .
    The petition was filed on December
    29,
    1972,
    and requests a delay from the January
    1,
    1973 date when we
    ordered that final cover shall be completed on the landfill
    site.
    Petitioner Lambert has been the operator of the site
    which is owned by the City.
    The landfill consists of
    approximately 23 acres and is located near Harrisburg in
    Saline County.
    The Board previously found that materials
    had been dumped at the
    site,’ including domestic garbage, trees,
    paper, lumber, brush, tires and appliances.
    We found
    Respondents in violation for open burning, inadequate daily
    cover, and failure to provide shelter sanitary facilities.
    In addition to ordering final cover of the site, Petitioners
    were ordered to cease and desist from all violations
    and penalties were assessed in the amount of
    $250 for
    Lambert and $500 for the City.
    Petitioners represent that final grading could not be
    completed by the ordered date because of the continuous
    rainfall in and about the area, which made it a physical im-
    possibility to use earth moving equipment necessary to complete
    that grading.
    A hearing was held on March
    9,
    1973 wherein a
    stipulation was entered by and between the respective
    parties.
    In that stipulation,
    the Petitioners acknowledged that they
    had read the recommendation of the Environmental Protection
    Agency
    (“Agencytt)
    and stated that weather permitting,
    final
    cover and grading would be accomplished within the time limit
    recommended.
    Petitioners also agreed to the other conditions
    7
    541

    —2—
    attached in that recommendation.
    The recommendation was
    that Petitioners be required to complete application of
    final cover within 100 days of the Board order granting the
    variance, and that progress reports be submitted to the
    Board and Agency at 25 day intervals,
    commencing at the
    date of the Board’s order granting the variance.
    A $10,000
    performance bond is to be posted to guarantee performance
    of all conditions.
    The Agency investigation discloses that material is
    available on the site for the application of proper final
    cover.
    The site itself has apparently been closed since
    April of 1972.
    The absence of final cover raises potential
    problems of vectors, odors and fire hazards.
    These problems
    may be aggravated during the summer months.
    In the interest
    of the public, the Respondents should proceed as quickly as
    possible to apply final cover.
    The stipulation appears the
    best way to accomplish this goal.
    This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclu-
    sions of law of the Board.
    IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1.
    Petitioners be required to complete application of
    final cover.
    2.
    Petitioners are granted a variance from Paragraph
    2
    of the order in #72-80 until 100 days from the date of this
    order.
    3.
    Progress reports are to be submitted by Petitioner
    to the Board and the Agency at
    25 day intervals commencing
    at
    the date of this order.
    4.
    Petitioners are required to submit a bond in the
    amount of $10,000 to guarantee performance of all conditions
    in Paragraphs
    1 and
    3, said bond
    to be posted in the form
    satisfactory to the Agency within
    14 days of this order.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted by
    the Board on the /~‘ day of
    ________________
    ,
    1973,
    by a vote
    of
    ___
    toC~
    7
    542

    Back to top