ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June
7,
1973
KALUZNY
BROTHERS,
INC.
)
)
)
#73—149
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(BY SAMUEL T.
LAWTON,
JR.):
Petitioner owns and operates
a plant in Joliet
rendering
animal by—products
to produce tallow, greaseand meat and bone meal.
During the operations, odors
are given off from several
locations.
These odors became the subject
of an enforcement proceeding in case
entitled Environmental Protection Agency v. Kaluzny Brothers,
Inc.,
#72-160, pursuant to which we entered an order on February 14, 1973
finding violations of Sections 9(a)
and 9(b) of the Environmental
Protection Act and Rule 3-2.110
of the Rules and Regulations Governing
the Control of Air Pollution.
Penalty in the amount of
$2,000 was
assessed and Kaluzny Brothers,
Inc. directed to submit an odor abate-
ment program within
45
days and ordered to cease and desist the
causing of odor emissions within
60 days from the rendition of the
Order.
The present petition seeks a variance until August 1,
1973 to
take the steps necessary to achieve such abatement.
Petitioner
proposes to install a scrubber system, having a Venturi and tower scrub-
ber in series.
All non—condensable gases
from cookers and fat dryers
will passthrough a Venturi-type scrubber and then through a packed tower
scrubber before discharge into the atmosphere.
In addition, ventilating
air in the plant building including that surrounding the odor sources,
particularly perc pans and fat dryers, will pass through the tower
scrubber.
Exhibits
5 and
6
to the petition describe the principal features
of the odor abatement system.
Exhibits
3,
4 and
7 depict the method
of installation.
Upon installation of the equipment described in
Exhibit
5,
the fats dryer will be moved from its present location
into proximity with the cookers and will be vented into the shell and
tube condenser associated with the cookers.
The non-condensible
gases
from the shell and tube condensers will pass from the Venturi
scrubber to the tower scrubber rather than the water sump as is presently
the case.
Petitioner anticipates an expenditure of approximately $49,000
and represents that upon installation and operation,
the odor emissions
8
—
237
from its operation will be in compliance with the Environmental
Protection Act and the relevant regulations.
The time schedule submitted indicates operation and testing
completed by August 1,
1973.
We believe the program to be an
ex-
tremely good one and commend petitioner for taking the steps that it
has to achieve compliance with our earlier order and with the
applicable law.
We are hopeful that the system will bring the results
anticipated.
Clearly, a variance to August 1 will be in the best
interests of the community.
The hardship on the company if the
variance is denied would be disproportionate to any continuing burden
on the neighborhood during the short period involved.
We grant the
variance as requested.
The Agency recommends the grant of the variance in substantial
accordance with the petition.
This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board.
IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board:
1.
That Kaluzny Brothers,
Inc.
.be
granted a variance from
the provisions
of Sections 9(a)
and
(b) of the Environ-
mental Protection Act,
Rule 103(b) (2)
of the Air
Pollution Regulations relating to operating permits,
Rule 104 relating to compliance programs and project
completion schedules and Rule 802(b) relating to
odor nuisances, until August
1,
1973.
2.
That Kaluzny Brothers,
Inc.
is granted
a variance from
our February 14, 1973 Order requiring it to cease and
desist the violations
found within 60 days, which period
is extended to August 1,
1973.
On or before August 15,
1973, petitioner and the Agency shall jointly perform such
odor tests
as are appropriate to ascertain compliance with
the foregoing provisions with respect to odor emissions
to determine the extent to which said odor nuisance has
been abated.
I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of the Pr5~11utionControl Board, certify
that the above Opinion and O;der was adopted on the
7’~’
day of
June,
1973, by a vote of
L/
to
~
—2—
8
—
238