ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June
    7,
    1973
    CENTRALIA
    ENGINEERING
    AND
    MACHINE
    CORPORATION
    #73—119
    v.
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION
    AGENCY
    )
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER
    OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (BY
    SAMUEL
    T.
    LAWTON,
    JR.):
    Petitioner
    owns
    property
    on
    which
    an
    abandoned
    mine
    shaft
    is
    located.
    On
    September
    1,
    1971,
    the Agency issued a permit to
    petitioner
    allowing
    for
    the
    shaft
    in
    question
    and
    an
    additional
    one
    not
    the
    subject
    of
    this
    proceeding, to be used jointly as a solid
    waste
    disposal
    site,
    subject
    to
    the
    standard
    conditions
    including
    the
    limitation that the authority granted by the permit allowed disposal
    only of non-combustible and non-putrescible
    refuse.
    The site was used for disposal of concrete refuse material.
    Petitioner appears
    to have complied with
    the
    provisions of
    the permit.
    However,
    at the present time, concrete refuse has been piled above
    grade between ten feet and fifteen feet.
    Petitioner seeks to be re-
    lieved of the daily and final compacting and covering requirements
    contained in Rule 5.07(a)
    and
    (b) of the Rules and Regulations For
    Refuse
    Disposal
    Sites
    and
    Facilities.
    Agency
    Exhibit
    1
    depicts
    the
    present
    condition
    of
    the
    site.
    Except
    for
    the
    rather
    unsightly
    visual
    attributes,
    there
    does
    not
    seem
    to
    be
    any significant environmental danger likely to result from
    leaving the concrete refuse uncovered.
    While petitioner suggests the
    possibility that the refuse may Esettle in the shaft and ultimately,
    be jowered to a point where cover is feasible, th~evidence of settling,
    both in the shaft in question and the other one previously used and
    covered, does not indicate the likelihood that significant settling
    will occur in the immediate future.
    We believe that petitioner should take steps
    to bring its
    operation
    into
    compliance
    with
    the
    relevant regulations, either by
    breaking
    up
    the
    concrete
    to
    enable
    its
    accommodation
    by
    the
    shaft
    or
    removal
    of
    that
    presently
    above
    grade,
    or
    a
    combination
    of
    both.
    We
    will
    grant
    petitioner
    a
    one-year
    variance
    from
    the
    provi-
    sions
    of
    the
    Rules
    and
    Regulations for Refuse Disposal Sites and Facilities
    in
    order
    to
    develop
    a program to achieve this result.
    Prior
    8
    23~

    to Nove~nber7, 1973,
    petitioner is directed to submit to the
    Agency and the Board,
    its program to achieve compliance with the
    relevant Regulations.
    This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board.
    IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1.
    Centralia Engineering and Machine Corporation be
    granted
    a variance until June 7,
    1974 from Section
    507(a)
    and
    (b) of the Rules and Regulations for Refuse
    Disposal Sites
    and Facilities, with respect to cover
    and
    compacting of its mine shaft property constituting
    the subject matter of this proceeding.
    Petitioner
    shall take all necessary steps to assure that adequate
    fencing
    is erected to prevent the site from becoming
    an attractive nuisance or source of danger.
    2.
    Petitioner will report to the Agency and the Board
    no later than November
    7,
    1973,
    its program to achieve
    compliance with the foregoing Regulations.
    I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board, certify
    that the above Opinion and Order was adopted on the
    1h
    day of
    June,
    1973, by a vote of
    1
    to ~
    —2—
    8
    232

    Back to top