ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
~1ay31, 1973
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 72-65
EARL B. ARCHDALE,
Respondent.
Richard M.
Baner, Special Assistant Attorney General,
on
behalf of Complainant;
Kenneth Bath on behalf of Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Seaman):
On February 22,
1972,
the Environmental Protection
Agency filed
a complaint against Respondent, Earl
B.
Archdale, charging numerous specific instances of open
burning, open dumping,
failure to provide vector control
and failure to spread and compact refuse, all allegedly
in violation of the Environmental Protection Act and the
Rules and Regulations adopted pursuant thereto. Respondent
is the owner and operator of
a refuse disposal facility
and site located in Waterford Township of Fulton County,
Illinois.
On August 29,
1972,
this Board entered an Interim
Opinion and Order.
The confused state of the proceeding
on that date
is illustrated by the following excerpt
(P.
2):
r~Becauseof the obvious desire of the parties to close
this matter without further hearing, we did attempt
to make our findings of fact and law from the
materials which were presented to us.
We find,
how-
ever,
that the combination of the nonsensical pleadings
and the reliance upon them as a basis
for the Stipu-
lation of Facts frustrates our purpose.
Any deter-
mination of facts from this record would constitute
the Board’s own Stipulation of Facts.
We see no
alternative but to return the case to the Hearing
Officer for further proceedings.”
8
—
109
—2—
The Agency’s Amended Complaint,
filed on February 15,
1973,
charges Respondent with violation of the following:
Section 9(c), Section
21(b)
and Section 12(a)
of
the Illinois Environmental Protection Act;
Rule 3.04, Rule 3.05,
Rule
5.06,
Rule 5.07,
Rule
5.09,
Rule
5.12 and Rule 5.12(c)
of the Rules and
Regulations for Refuse Disposal Sites and Facilities
effective pursuant to Section 49(c)
of the Act.
A hearing was held on March
20,
1973.
At that hearing,
Respondent testified that his facility had been closed
since September of 1972
(R.
34).
Respondent further testi-
fied that the requisite two feet of compacted cover had not
then been totally completed
(R.
49).
The evidence produced at the hearing proved numerous
violations of the Act and Rules.
There was evidence
of
a fire which lasted for over
a week
(R.
46,
179),
a dense
fly population
(R.
74),
lack of daily cover and compacting
activity
(R.
84,
92)
and open dumping
(R.
157).
The Respondent is a man of modest means, engaged
primarily as a factory worker.
He has testified to his
desire to cease all operation of the facility.
This Board
is, therefore, disposed to order the facility closed and to
assess
a small penalty.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the Board.
IT
IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
1.
Respondent
shall pay to the State of Illinois the
sum of $100 within thirty days of the date of this Order.
Penalty payment by certified check or money order payable
to the State of Illinois shall be made to:
Fiscal Services
Division, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
2200
Churchill Road,
Springfield, Illinois 62706.
2.
Respondent shall provide final cover to the top
and face of the disposal site pursuant to the requirements
of Rule 5.07(b) on or before July 15,
1972;
3.
The site referred to in the Complaint shall be and
is ordered closed as
a refuse disposal
site;
4.
Further operation of this site as
a refuse disposal
site shall be onlyafter
full compliance by the Respondent
with the statutory requirements for beginning and continuance
of
such operations.
8—
110
—3—
5.
Respondent shall cease and desist from all viola-
tions of the Act and Regulations at the location in question.
I,
Christan L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted on
the
ji
~‘
day of
r~-~
~
,
1973,
by
a vote of
~
to
c:~~
8— 111