ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February 14, 1973
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    v.
    )
    PCB 71—326
    ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle):
    This is an enforcement action alleging violations of Sections
    12(a) and (b) of the Environmental Protection Act and Rules 1.03
    (a), (b), (c) and (d); Rule 1.05 (d); Rule 1.07(1), (2), (3) and
    (4)
    ;
    and Rule 1,08 (10) (b) (2)
    ,
    (3) and (4) and 10(c) of the Rules
    and Regulations of the Illinois Sanitary Water Board as. set forth
    in SWB-l4. The violations are alleged to have occurred on May 6,
    May 26, June 17 and June 25, 1971. Hearing was held on October 9,
    1972 at which time a Stipulation of Facts was admitted into the
    record.
    Allied’s plant is located in the City of Danville. Their two
    principal products are fluorinated hydrocarbons and muriatic acid.
    The production of these products results in a waste reject material
    containing essentially hydrochloric acid and aluminum chloride-
    fluoride complex which are neutralized and disposed of via the plant
    ~ffluent sewer to the Danville Sanitary District. In order to
    neutralize this waste reject it is pumped into a holding lagoon on
    the plant property.
    The unnamed tributary to Lick Creek which is referred to in the
    complaint is a natural drainage ditch which flows east and west and
    is located ten feet north of Allied’s property line. This drainage,
    after passing Allied, flows under Route 136 in a northerly direction.
    On the north side of Route 136 it is joined by drainage from another
    ditch and then eventually proceeds westerly again until it empties
    into Lick Creek.
    On May 6, May 26, June 17 and June 25, 1971, the State took
    various samples at points as indicated on Respondent’s Exhibit 1,
    Overlay 1C. The results of the tests are shown in State’s Exhibits
    1, 2, 3 and 4. Points 1, 2 and 3 referred to in those Exhibits
    were points from which samples were taken on Allied’s property.
    Point 4 is located on the north side of Route 136 at the point where
    the drainage ditch goes under Route 136. Point 5 is located midway
    between Allied’s property and Lick Creek. Point 6 is located 50
    7 —65

    feet from where the natural drainage ditch enters Lick Creek. Point
    7 is located at a point on Lick Creek above where the natural drain-
    age ditch enters it and Point 8 is located at a point on Lick Creek
    below where the natural drainage ditch enters it.
    On May 6, 1971 (State Ex. 1) samples were taken at Point 1 only.
    The results show fluoride at 140 mg/i, chloride at 3400 mg/i, total
    dissolved solids (TDS) at 3600 mg/i, and pH of 2.2, The flow is
    not given and we have no knowledge of whether this is a torrent or
    a puddle.
    On May 26, 1971 (State Ex. 2) samples were taken at all 8 points.
    The results show fluoride up to 316 mg/i, chloride up to 5200 mg/i,
    TDS up to 9830 mg/l and suspended solids up to 510 mg/l. The fluoride
    water quality in Lick Creek deteriorated from 0.34 mg/i to 13 mg/i
    after mixing with the natural drainage ditch contents of 18 mg/i.
    It was admitted by Allied that they had a chemical spill on May 25,
    1971 (R. 14—15)
    On June 17, 1971 (State Ex. 3) the fluorides from the drainage
    ditch were at 8.0 mg/i (Point No. 6) while Lick Creek’s fluorides
    were 0.73 mg/i. After mixing Lick Creek became 1.8 mg/i,
    The June 25, 1971 data seems anomalous. The drainage ditch at
    Point No. 6 has 2.0 mg/l fluoride, Lick Creek has zero, yet down-
    stream has 7.4 mg/l.
    Rules 1.03 (d) and 1.07 (4) of SWB-l4 are identical and require
    freedom from substances attributable to industrial discharges in
    concentrations which are toxic or harmful to animal life. The fluoride
    levels in Lick Creek on May 26 and June 17 exceed the level given in
    EPA Exhibit 1 (p. 191) as the threshold for effects on animals, The
    area adjacent to the tributaries is pasture land with stock present
    (R. 5—6)
    Since 1970 Allied has taken numerous steps to eliminate potential
    sources of pollution such as repairing sewer lines, building a dam
    surrounding one of its lagoons, anchoring an outlet pipe to prevent
    wastes from reaching the storm drainage system, installing a plug in
    a tile from an oil sand filter, installing a pH meter in the storm
    sewer, diverting floor drains and water softener brine and boiler
    blowdown from the storm sewers to the sanitary sewers and installing
    certain pumps to prevent certain discharges from entering the storm
    drainage sewers.
    The Stipulation of Facts on pp. 7—8 recounts the extensive test-
    ing that Allied engaged in on December 6-7, 1971 and from October 15,
    1971 to October 4, 1972. The December 6-7, 1971 data, using Agency
    test results show no deleterious effect on Lick Creek’s fluoride
    water quality. The sampling points are incorrectly given in the
    Stipulation as being on Overlay C. They are on Overlay D, The mass
    of data in Ex. 34 for October 15, 1971
    October 4, 1972 shows
    anomalies where downstream levels of fluorides in Lick Creek are
    higher than the levels in the upstream flows. Either the analytical
    technique is
    at
    fault or some other source is present. We feel that
    Allied should be commended for its sampling program.
    7
    66

    On June 22, 1972, Allied began drilling a 6,000 foot deep
    waste disposal well under a construction permit from the Agency
    at a cost of $500,000. Upon receipt of a permit from the Agency
    to operate the well Allied will install a 2,000 ton storage tank
    for waste reject material from its processes for holding prior
    to injecting it into the deep well. At that time the present
    lagoon will be retained for an emergency in the event of a break-
    down in the deep well system. Since January 1, 1972, Allied has
    spent on pollution equipment, controls and maintenance $171,378.
    We find that on May 26, 1971 and June 17, 1971 Allied did
    cause, threaten and allow the discharge of contaminants so as ~o
    cause or tend to cause water pollution, in violation of Section
    12(a) of the Act and Rules 1,03(d) and 1.07(4) of SWB—14. We also
    find, however, that Allied has made significant efforts to improve
    the situation and therefore a penalty of $1,000 would be appropriate.
    ORDER
    1. Allied shall cease and desist from all violations found in
    this opinion.
    2. Allied shall continue and adhere to its remedial program
    as set forth in this opinion and the Stipulation of Facts.
    3. Allied shall pay to the State of Illinois by March
    15,
    1973
    the sum of $1,000. Penalty payment by certified check or money order
    payable to the State of Illinois shall be made to: Fiscal Services
    Division, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 2200 Churchill
    Road, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, certify t at the above Opinion and Order was adopted on the
    /~/‘~“
    day of
    ____________,
    1973, by a vote of ~
    to ~
    —3—
    7 —67

    .
    .

    Back to top