ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONT ROb BOARI)
November 1, 1973
MERIDIAN COMMUNITY UNIT SCUOOL
)
DISTRICT NO. 223
PETITIONER
V.
)
PCI3
73—349
ENVIRONMENTAL
P ROTECTION AGHN CY
RESPONDENT
AR. DERYLE BEIIMER, SECRETARY, BOARD
OF’ EDUCATION,
in behalf of
the MERIDIAN COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 223
MR. LEE A. CAMPBELL, ASSISTANT
ATTOENLY
GENERAL, in bettaif of
the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEil CY
OPINION AND ORDER OF’ THE BOAR1) (by Mr. Marder)
This action involves a variance request: by the Meridian
Coin—
munity Unit School I)istrict. Relief is sought from a sewer ban im-
posed by
the
Agency,
pursuant to
Rule 921 (a) of Chapter 3.
The
i4eridian District operates at present four school build—
ings housing a total of approximately 1500 students.
The
majorit:y
of these students are located in Stiliman
Valley, while a
minor per-
centage are located in a K—8 school system in Nonroe Center.
These
townships are located in Ogle
County, Illinois.
Petitioner alleges that all
schools in
the district
are over-
populated,
and tLat the continuance of
t~iis
situation
could only
cause hardship on
the
students.
In December 1972 the School Board presented a referendum
to the voters of the district,
requesting a new
high
school and add-
itions to an elementary nuilding.
This referendum failed by a 2-1
vote. In ~4arch1973 questionnaires were sent out to the voters, and
while 70 of the answers indicated
the
desire for a new school, the
major objection to
the
referendum
was that
it called for
a new build-
ing on a site which would require independent sewer service. The
implication left ~is that a new referendum would succeed if land were
annexed to Stiliman Valley and the village sewer plant used to ser-
vice
the
new building.
9—
727
—2—
Status of Stiliman Valley sewage plant:
The existing village sewage treatment plant contains a trick-
ling filter, an aerated lagoon, and a tertiary polishing pond. The
effluent from this pond is discharged to Stiliman Creek, which has
a 7-day, 10-year low flow of about 0.5 mgd. The effluent, somewhere
in excess of the design average flow of 0.045 mgd is unchiorinated,
and therefore contains an excess of fecal coliforms. Grab samples
obtained by the Agency show the following results:
Date
130D
SS
Fecal Coliform
(mg/i)
m~7l
(count /100 ml)
Jan. 11 ‘73
55
26
50,000
Feb. 15 773
32
22
23,000
Apr. 2
773
16
23
600
Jun. 11 ~73
30
80
4,300
Jul. 26
773
4
33
3,600
The allowable under Rule 404 (a) are BOD
-
30 mg/i, SS
-
37 mg/i, F.C. 400/100 ml. (F, C. regulated by Rule 405.)
Although
all
counts are exceeded
in
some instances, the major
offender, as indicated, is fecal coliforms~ The Agency reports
that because of the
relatively high dilution ratio, no
noticeable
degradation
of
Stiliman
Creek
is observed.
On October 5~ 1972, the Agency
issued a construction permit
to the village
to
allow upgrading of the sewage
plant,
Construct-
ion has not co~unencedbecause
of the
absence
of federal
funds.
The
sewer
ban
is therefore still on
effect.
Plans of Unit Tlistrict
The District allea:es that It has taken certain, steps to alley—
iatn the overorowdany) however these stes are at best temporary
and unreasonably h 1gb. i:n ens t
C)ne action cons :Ldered by the blat
—
riot would. be to add on to the exl.st_lnq: hi.gh school buildlnq in
order to utilize exist:Lnq sewe:r: facilities
.
ThIs
wouid not~ be the
answer in that the lno.rease in P P allied would, still not b:a at
l(m.Te unde:c the sewer baa
To better
uT
arstand the
resee.t an
ro:osed
lt:uatIc~n the following teals isaresentecL
11111 bul i.ciin,e~ are al 1:5 ci to be )VSnlOadSd
~Vc~
amount
us nion I. is not
:1. rca Ic r td;ie K I an I. K I hal. :t~I.,:L
~::eri I h aus be
a
—3--
PRESENT
SITUATION
Location
Grade Pres.
Pop.
Max. Cap. No. Over Over
1. St. Valley K—5
490
410
80
20
2. St. Valley 6—8
290
200
90
45
3. St. Valley High
435
350
85
33
4.
Monroe
K—8
275
229
46
20
PROPOSED PLAN
Location
Grade Prop. Pop.
Max, Cap. No. Over Over
1. St. Valley K—S
490
410
80
20
2. St. Valley 6—8
390
550
—160
3. St. Valley Merged with 6-8 Building
4. St. Valley New H.S. 435+
5. Monroe
K—S
175
229
The above clearly demonstrates the plan of the district, namely
to eliminate overloading in the district by:
A)
Combining Buildings 2 and 3 into a 6-8 building
and transferring
about 100 students from Building
4
to the combined facilities
B) Building a new high school and transferring all of
the students from Building 3 to this new building
C) Possibly transferring some students from Building
1 to Monroe.
The maximum increase on the Stiliman Valley sewage plant will be
100 students; however, it should be less due to the transfer of
some students from Stiliman Valley to the Monroe School. The Agen-
cy believes that the increase of some 25/gal/day student on a
max-
imum of 100 student increase should not seriously affect the pres-
ent water quality of Stiliman Creek.
As mentioned above a new referendum would have to be presented
to the voters in order to secure funds for a new building, The
Board then is asked to grant a variance before the feasibility of
a new high school is tested, This leads the Board to believe that
two parallel paths will be followed concurrently:
—4—
A) The attempt to gain funds for, construct, oc-
cupy, and use a new high school, and
B) The attempt to secure funds for, construct,
and operate a new addition to the present
sewage plant.
Although the Board feels that the variance petition may be pre-
mature in that no existing building is available, there is suffic-
ient hardship present to warrant a variance.
It is important to note that this case is different from the
now common North Shore sanitary hookup requests which the Board
must face in two very important respects:
1. The magnitude of flow from Stiliman Valley
is of much lesser quantity than those of
the major districts, and construction once
started can be accomplished in a relatively
short time.
2. Stilirnan Valley is not in the center of a
rapidly growing metropolis, but rather is
in a rural area. The grant of this vari-
ance would more probably be a single excep-
tion, rather than one in a series of requests.
In scope, then, this action is similar to the “Ronald H. and Car-
olyn Bower vs. Environmental Protection Agency, PCB 73-273” in which
the Board granted a variance in a smaller community, which was wait-
ing federal funding for a new sewage facility.
The Agency has brought up two points in its recommendation
which will now be discussed.
1) The Agency has received two citizen objections to the vari-
ance. Both complainants have the same address and last name, and
are assumed to be related. The only complaint of importance is
that the new construction could possibly endanger the drinking water
supply. No evidence was submitted to support this complaint.
2) The Agency contends that a precondition to the grant should
be the installation of interim chlorination facilities at the exist-
ing village plant. While the Board feels that such treatment would
be beneficial, and is indeed sorely needed, we fail to see how this
is
Petitioner’s responsibility. Petitioner is a school district
and as such has no legal right to order the village to install in-
terim chlorination. This would be akin to asking an individual home
owner to order the North Shore Sanitary District to build enlarged
facilities as a precondition for his variance. The Agency would do
better to simply recommend a flat denial than to recommend a condi-
tion of this sort. Indeed, irrespective of the outcome of this pet-
itiOn, the Agency should consider instituting discussions with the
9
—
130
—5—
Stillman Valley Village Board regarding chlorination of its effluent.
In light of the above the Board will order the variance granted.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
law of the Board.
IT IS
THE
ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that a variation
be granted to the Meridian Community Unit School District No. 223
to hook up a proposed high school to the existing Stillman Valley
sewage plant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of
the
Illinois Pollution Control
Board, certify th~tthe above Opinion and Order was adopted by the
Board on the
/
~ day of
~
1973,
by a vote of ~
to
0
I
9
—
731
I
4