ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONT ROb BOARI)
    November 1, 1973
    MERIDIAN COMMUNITY UNIT SCUOOL
    )
    DISTRICT NO. 223
    PETITIONER
    V.
    )
    PCI3
    73—349
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    P ROTECTION AGHN CY
    RESPONDENT
    AR. DERYLE BEIIMER, SECRETARY, BOARD
    OF’ EDUCATION,
    in behalf of
    the MERIDIAN COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 223
    MR. LEE A. CAMPBELL, ASSISTANT
    ATTOENLY
    GENERAL, in bettaif of
    the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEil CY
    OPINION AND ORDER OF’ THE BOAR1) (by Mr. Marder)
    This action involves a variance request: by the Meridian
    Coin—
    munity Unit School I)istrict. Relief is sought from a sewer ban im-
    posed by
    the
    Agency,
    pursuant to
    Rule 921 (a) of Chapter 3.
    The
    i4eridian District operates at present four school build—
    ings housing a total of approximately 1500 students.
    The
    majorit:y
    of these students are located in Stiliman
    Valley, while a
    minor per-
    centage are located in a K—8 school system in Nonroe Center.
    These
    townships are located in Ogle
    County, Illinois.
    Petitioner alleges that all
    schools in
    the district
    are over-
    populated,
    and tLat the continuance of
    t~iis
    situation
    could only
    cause hardship on
    the
    students.
    In December 1972 the School Board presented a referendum
    to the voters of the district,
    requesting a new
    high
    school and add-
    itions to an elementary nuilding.
    This referendum failed by a 2-1
    vote. In ~4arch1973 questionnaires were sent out to the voters, and
    while 70 of the answers indicated
    the
    desire for a new school, the
    major objection to
    the
    referendum
    was that
    it called for
    a new build-
    ing on a site which would require independent sewer service. The
    implication left ~is that a new referendum would succeed if land were
    annexed to Stiliman Valley and the village sewer plant used to ser-
    vice
    the
    new building.
    9—
    727

    —2—
    Status of Stiliman Valley sewage plant:
    The existing village sewage treatment plant contains a trick-
    ling filter, an aerated lagoon, and a tertiary polishing pond. The
    effluent from this pond is discharged to Stiliman Creek, which has
    a 7-day, 10-year low flow of about 0.5 mgd. The effluent, somewhere
    in excess of the design average flow of 0.045 mgd is unchiorinated,
    and therefore contains an excess of fecal coliforms. Grab samples
    obtained by the Agency show the following results:
    Date
    130D
    SS
    Fecal Coliform
    (mg/i)
    m~7l
    (count /100 ml)
    Jan. 11 ‘73
    55
    26
    50,000
    Feb. 15 773
    32
    22
    23,000
    Apr. 2
    773
    16
    23
    600
    Jun. 11 ~73
    30
    80
    4,300
    Jul. 26
    773
    4
    33
    3,600
    The allowable under Rule 404 (a) are BOD
    -
    30 mg/i, SS
    -
    37 mg/i, F.C. 400/100 ml. (F, C. regulated by Rule 405.)
    Although
    all
    counts are exceeded
    in
    some instances, the major
    offender, as indicated, is fecal coliforms~ The Agency reports
    that because of the
    relatively high dilution ratio, no
    noticeable
    degradation
    of
    Stiliman
    Creek
    is observed.
    On October 5~ 1972, the Agency
    issued a construction permit
    to the village
    to
    allow upgrading of the sewage
    plant,
    Construct-
    ion has not co~unencedbecause
    of the
    absence
    of federal
    funds.
    The
    sewer
    ban
    is therefore still on
    effect.
    Plans of Unit Tlistrict
    The District allea:es that It has taken certain, steps to alley—
    iatn the overorowdany) however these stes are at best temporary
    and unreasonably h 1gb. i:n ens t
    C)ne action cons :Ldered by the blat
    riot would. be to add on to the exl.st_lnq: hi.gh school buildlnq in
    order to utilize exist:Lnq sewe:r: facilities
    .
    ThIs
    wouid not~ be the
    answer in that the lno.rease in P P allied would, still not b:a at
    l(m.Te unde:c the sewer baa
    To better
    uT
    arstand the
    resee.t an
    ro:osed
    lt:uatIc~n the following teals isaresentecL
    11111 bul i.ciin,e~ are al 1:5 ci to be )VSnlOadSd
    ~Vc~
    amount
    us nion I. is not
    :1. rca Ic r td;ie K I an I. K I hal. :t~I.,:L
    ~::eri I h aus be
    a

    —3--
    PRESENT
    SITUATION
    Location
    Grade Pres.
    Pop.
    Max. Cap. No. Over Over
    1. St. Valley K—5
    490
    410
    80
    20
    2. St. Valley 6—8
    290
    200
    90
    45
    3. St. Valley High
    435
    350
    85
    33
    4.
    Monroe
    K—8
    275
    229
    46
    20
    PROPOSED PLAN
    Location
    Grade Prop. Pop.
    Max, Cap. No. Over Over
    1. St. Valley K—S
    490
    410
    80
    20
    2. St. Valley 6—8
    390
    550
    —160
    3. St. Valley Merged with 6-8 Building
    4. St. Valley New H.S. 435+
    5. Monroe
    K—S
    175
    229
    The above clearly demonstrates the plan of the district, namely
    to eliminate overloading in the district by:
    A)
    Combining Buildings 2 and 3 into a 6-8 building
    and transferring
    about 100 students from Building
    4
    to the combined facilities
    B) Building a new high school and transferring all of
    the students from Building 3 to this new building
    C) Possibly transferring some students from Building
    1 to Monroe.
    The maximum increase on the Stiliman Valley sewage plant will be
    100 students; however, it should be less due to the transfer of
    some students from Stiliman Valley to the Monroe School. The Agen-
    cy believes that the increase of some 25/gal/day student on a
    max-
    imum of 100 student increase should not seriously affect the pres-
    ent water quality of Stiliman Creek.
    As mentioned above a new referendum would have to be presented
    to the voters in order to secure funds for a new building, The
    Board then is asked to grant a variance before the feasibility of
    a new high school is tested, This leads the Board to believe that
    two parallel paths will be followed concurrently:

    —4—
    A) The attempt to gain funds for, construct, oc-
    cupy, and use a new high school, and
    B) The attempt to secure funds for, construct,
    and operate a new addition to the present
    sewage plant.
    Although the Board feels that the variance petition may be pre-
    mature in that no existing building is available, there is suffic-
    ient hardship present to warrant a variance.
    It is important to note that this case is different from the
    now common North Shore sanitary hookup requests which the Board
    must face in two very important respects:
    1. The magnitude of flow from Stiliman Valley
    is of much lesser quantity than those of
    the major districts, and construction once
    started can be accomplished in a relatively
    short time.
    2. Stilirnan Valley is not in the center of a
    rapidly growing metropolis, but rather is
    in a rural area. The grant of this vari-
    ance would more probably be a single excep-
    tion, rather than one in a series of requests.
    In scope, then, this action is similar to the “Ronald H. and Car-
    olyn Bower vs. Environmental Protection Agency, PCB 73-273” in which
    the Board granted a variance in a smaller community, which was wait-
    ing federal funding for a new sewage facility.
    The Agency has brought up two points in its recommendation
    which will now be discussed.
    1) The Agency has received two citizen objections to the vari-
    ance. Both complainants have the same address and last name, and
    are assumed to be related. The only complaint of importance is
    that the new construction could possibly endanger the drinking water
    supply. No evidence was submitted to support this complaint.
    2) The Agency contends that a precondition to the grant should
    be the installation of interim chlorination facilities at the exist-
    ing village plant. While the Board feels that such treatment would
    be beneficial, and is indeed sorely needed, we fail to see how this
    is
    Petitioner’s responsibility. Petitioner is a school district
    and as such has no legal right to order the village to install in-
    terim chlorination. This would be akin to asking an individual home
    owner to order the North Shore Sanitary District to build enlarged
    facilities as a precondition for his variance. The Agency would do
    better to simply recommend a flat denial than to recommend a condi-
    tion of this sort. Indeed, irrespective of the outcome of this pet-
    itiOn, the Agency should consider instituting discussions with the
    9
    130

    —5—
    Stillman Valley Village Board regarding chlorination of its effluent.
    In light of the above the Board will order the variance granted.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Board.
    IT IS
    THE
    ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that a variation
    be granted to the Meridian Community Unit School District No. 223
    to hook up a proposed high school to the existing Stillman Valley
    sewage plant.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of
    the
    Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, certify th~tthe above Opinion and Order was adopted by the
    Board on the
    /
    ~ day of
    ~
    1973,
    by a vote of ~
    to
    0
    I
    9
    731

    I
    4

    Back to top