ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 11, 1973
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
COMPLAINANT
v.
)
PCB 72-218
3. R. SHORT MILLING COMPANY
RESPONDENT
MR. DENNIS K. MUNCY, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, on behalf of
the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
MR. PHILLIP B. BOWMP~Non behalf of the
3.
R. SHORT MILLING
COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Marder)
This is an enforcement action filed against
3.
R. Short Mill-
ing Company by the Environmental Protection Agency on
May
22, 1972.
The Environmental Protection Agency alleges violation of:
1) Violation of Section 9 (a) of the Environmental
Protection Act
2) Violation of Rule 2—2.53 of the Rules and Regula-
tions Governing the Control of Air Pollution (Rules)
3) Violations of Rule 3—3.122 of the Rules.
3.
R. Short Milling Company is an agriculturally-oriented pro-
cessing firm, operating two mills at its Kankakee, Illinois, loca-
tion. The first plant is a corn milling division, which produces
more than 5,000,000 bushels of corn per year. The second plant is
its bakery division which produces special flour for the wholesale
baking industry. The company accounts for 8 of the market. The
3.
R. Short Milling Company also operates a 1,000,000 bushel grain
elevator, used for storage and drying of said grains. To generate
steam for the above process 3. R. Short Milling Company owns and
operates a coal-fired boiler. lEt is this boiler, towards which the
aforementioned allegations are directed.
On January 5, 1973, Respondent filed a motion to strike the
complaint and dismiss the proceedings. On February 7, 1973, the
Agency filed a response to Respondent~s motion, and upon considera-
tion the Board issued an order denying the Respondent’s motion.
The first hearing was held on April 4, 1973. At that time
the hearing officer presiding determined that the Agency and the
3,
R. Short Milling Company were about to enter into a stipulation.
9
—
435
—2—
The hearing was continued to allow said stipulation to be formulated.
On May 29, 1973, a hearing was held, and the proposed stipula-
tion was read into the record. No citizens were present at the hear-
ing, and the reading of the stipulation was
the
net result of the
hearing.
A few pertinent points should be made at this time.
1. The Agency reported evidence, unrebutted, that
violations of Sec. 9 (a)
,
Rule 2-2,53, and Rule
3-3.122 had occurred.
2. This evidence relied on:
a) Visual inspection of site
b) Calculated emission rates
c) Ringelmann readings as taken by a certi-
fied smoke reader.
3.
3. R. Short proposed to take immediate action to replace
its existing coal-fired boiler.
The terms of the agreed—upon stipulation appear to be an ade-
quate settlement of this case, and the Board’s order will so show.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board.
ORDER
IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
1. The 3. R. Short Milling Company is ordered to purchase,
install, and operate a steam generating plant capable
of the following:
a) Being operational by June
1,
1973
b) Being able to utilize fuels which will allow
compliance with all applicable pollution rules
and regulations of the State of Illinois.
2. The
3.
R. Short Milling Company is ordered to oper-
ate said steam generating plant so as to allow com-
pliance with all applicable pollution rules and reg-
ulations of the State of Illinois.
3.
3.
R, Short Milling Company is to cease and desist
from using their existing coal—fueled steam generating
plant on June 1, 1973.
9— 430
—3
4. T~spondent shall pay to the State of Illinois the
sum of $1,000 within 35 days from the date of this
order. Penalty payment by certified check or money
order payable to the State of Illinois shall be made
to: Fiscal Services Division, Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency,
2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
Illinois, 62706.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, certify that the above Opi i n and Order was adopted
by the Board on the
ii
~‘
day of
_________________,
1973, by
avoteof
4
to ~
9—437
.
.